Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
JDS-G223X1
Scope ................................................................................................................................................... 2
Initial Sample Inspection Report (ISIR) Dimensional and Material Results .................................. 14
10
11
12
13
14
15
References ......................................................................................................................................... 28
Current edition:
2015-01-08
Supersedes:
First issued:
2015-01-08
Design Control: DT
Page 1 of 28
John Deere Standards are intended for use by Deere & Company, its divisions and subsidiaries. Suppliers who rely on them in
furnishing products to or for the benefit of the Company must determine that they are in possession of the latest version.
Distribution of the standards to parties other than John Deere Suppliers, whether with or without charge, are for information only and
Deere & Company disclaims all responsibility for results attributable to the application of or compliance with such standards. The
Company makes no representation, express or implied, that conformity ensures compliance with applicable law or other rules or
regulations. Further, those who are in receipt of and elect to use the standards, agree to assume the responsibility for compliance
with patents, as well as potential patent infringement.
Deere & Company Engineering Standards Department, One John Deere Place, Moline, Illinois 61265-8098, U.S.A. Unpublished
All rights reserved under the copyright laws.
JDS-G223X1
1
Scope
1.1
JDS-G223X1 contains sample forms that are referenced throughout the JDS-G223 standard. The
current and more detailed forms can be found on the John Deere Supplier Network (JDSN) website.
JDS-G223X1 can contain mandatory provisions, which are identified by the words shall or
required. Compliance with the mandatory provisions is required to claim conformance with this standard.
This standard can also contain guideline provisions, which are generally identified by the words should
or recommended. Compliance with the guideline provisions is not required, because they might not be
appropriate for all machines or all applications.
1.2
John Deere requires Suppliers to electronically submit Change Requests via JDSN. If electronic
submission is not possible, the following form shall be used. The required information is listed below.
Part and Supplier information
Part Number or Numbers
Part Name
Decision Number
Revision Level
Supplier Name
Supplier Number
Address
Reason for submitting request for manufacturing process and product change authorization
Design/Material Change
Process Change
Location Change
Tooling Change
Supplier Change
Other
Reason for proposed change
Improve Product Quality
Increase Manufacturing Efficiency
Reduce Lead Time
Other
JDS-G223X1
Describe proposed change and the quality plan to ensure the quality of product will not be
adversely affected. Attach all supporting information.
Proposed implementation date
Changes that deviate from drawings or specifications
Explanation
Supplier Signature and Title
Date
Supplier not to proceed until it receives authorization from John Deere.
This authorization to proceed is granted upon the understanding that it is advisory in nature and in no
manner changes the Suppliers original responsibility for ensuring that all characteristics, designated in
the applicable engineering specifications, and/or inherent in the samples as originally tested and
approved, are maintained. Supplier accepts full responsibility for the changes of types of changes listed
above; and should such changes result in failure to meet customer requirements, Supplier shall be
expected to fully reimburse John Deere for all expenses incurred to correct the deficiency.
Submission of Change Request should be submitted electronically via JDSN.
John Deere is responsible for providing a follow up date for any conditional approvals.
JDS-G223X1
Decision No:
Revision Level:
Product Application:
Originator:
Phone:
Email:
Supplier Name:
Supplier ID Code:
Supplier Contact:
Email:
Phone:
Initial Submission
Design/Material Change(s)
*Supplier Change
(new source, source manufacturing change, etc.)
Please Specify:
*Manufacturing Change
(location, process, tooling, etc.) Please Specify:
Increased
Efficiency
Mfg.
Other
Control Plan
Gage R&R
Capability Study
Sample Parts
Master Sample
Material Certification
Verification Test
Process FMEA
Weight/piece:
Kg.
Special Notes:
Yes
No (If No,
I affirm that the samples, data and information represented by this submission are representative of our parts and have been made
to the applicable John Deere Drawings and specifications and are made from specified materials on regular production tooling at
production rate with no operations other that the regular production process. I have noted any deviations below:
Production material, tooling, and processes used?
Name (printed):
Yes
Phone:
Date:
FOR JOHN DEERE USE ONLY
Approve
Deviation / Follow-up/Conditional
Reject
Signatures:
Quality Engineer:
Date:
Supply Management:
Date:
Design Engineer:
(for supplier initiated design changes only)
Date:
Materials Engineer:
(for supplier initiated material and/or special process changes)
Date:
Other:
Date:
JDS-G223X1
Major component reliability demonstration is part of the Product Verification and Validation plan. It should
include identification of high risk failure modes / mechanisms, clear visibility between requirements and
tests, closure of identified gaps in the reliability demonstration plan and tracked completed of reliability
demonstration PV&V activities.
Failure
Mechanism Test
Guide
Periodic revisions throughout the design process to the DFMEA and SFMEA
are recommended to maintain all failure modes current and relevant
Design Reviews
PV&V Plan
Reviews
Review activity, led by PV&V, to develop and modify the test plan for a
particular product
Inherent reliability
analysis
Used to ensure that we are employing resources to areas of the design that
need more work to drive the overall component reliability to the business goals
JDS-G223X1
Supplier Name:
Supplier Address:
City:
State:
Component Name:
Component Part Number:
Requirement Verification (Analytical) - Due Date (Optional):
Requirement Verification (Prototype) - Due Date:
Production Intent Prototype Due Date:
Other Information:
YES _____
Supplier Number:
Zip Code:
NO ______
Supplier Representative:
Date:
Supplier Representative
Comments:
Date:
Signatures:
John Deere Representative:
Supplier Representative:
Date:
Date:
4
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
JDS-G223X1
JDS-G223X1
JDS-G223X1
Review
Customer Validation
(Customer Focus
Groups, etc.)
Design FMEA (Failure
Modes & Effects Analysis
- System, subsystem,
assembly, or component
level)
Design Review
Design Analysis
Lab Test
Casting Solidification ADV (Accelerated Design
Verification)
CFD (Computational Chassis Dyno
Fluid Dynamics)
Drivetrain
Engineering
DPAR (Design, Process, Electrical /
and Assembly Review)
Electronics
E-build
Fastener Application
General Review
HDRS (Hazard Discovery
and Rating System)
Industrial Design Review
Print Review
Process FMEA (Failure
Modes and Effects
Analysis)
Reliability Planning
Risk Assessment
Serviceability Review
Software Reviews
Standards Compliance
(Standards Regulations &
Conformity Assessment SRC)
Styling/Appearance
Supplier Review
System FMEA (Failure
Modes and Effects
Analysis)
Durability
Field Stress
Durability
JDS-G223X1
5
10
JDS-G223X1
The list of items below should be considered when conducting a DPAR. Documentation of the DPAR
results shall be recorded. C = Complete; I = In Process; N = Not Applicable.
Design, Process and Assembly Review Checklist
C/I/N
#
DESCRIPTION
COMMENT
1. DESIGN REVIEW (Print or Model)
1.1 Review material requirements
1.2 Review geometric dimensioning and tolerancing
1.3 Review drawing/model format for clarity and completeness
1.4 Review design and functional requirements
1.5 Review John Deere / Supplier test plan and test results
1.6 Review tolerances for manufacturability
1.7 Review all applicable specifications & standards
1.8 Identify key design characteristics from Design Reviews & other sources
1.9 Determine requirements for Gage R & R studies on measuring equipment
1.10 Determine method to measure key design characteristics
1.11 Determine capability study or control plan requirements on key characteristics plus
other characteristics defined by John Deere or the supplier.
1.12 Review preferred methods for capability assessment
1.13 Determine method for capability studies on key characteristics plus other
characteristics defined by John Deere
1.14 Review guidelines for control methods after capability assessment
1.15 Review procedure and requirements for initial sample inspection
1.16 Review Appearance / Paint requirements
1.17 Review requirements for cleanliness and deburring
1.18 Identify cost reduction opportunities
1.19 Determine potential cost impacts of any changes identified
2. PROCESS REVIEW
2.1 Review all processes required to produce the part/assembly, e.g. machining,
grinding, stamping, welding, assembly, plating, heat treatment, bonding, painting
2.2 Review manufacturing process for completeness
2.3 Review specifications related to these processes
2.4 Review key process characteristics from Design Reviews, Process Failure Modes
& Effects Analysis (PFMEAs) & other sources
2.5 Determine method to measure key process characteristics
2.6 Determine requirements for Gage R & R studies on measuring equipment
2.7 Determine capability study or control plan requirements on key characteristics plus
other characteristics defined by John Deere
2.8 Review preferred methods for capability assessment
2.9 Determine method for capability studies on key characteristics plus other
characteristics defined by John Deere
2.10 Review guidelines for control methods after capability assessment
2.11 Review requirements for cleanliness, debarring, packaging, rust preventives etc.
2.12 Review Operator Method Sheets (OMS)
2.13 Review Sequence of Events (SOE)
2.14 Review machining instruction requirements
2.15 Review training needs
2.16 Review Mistake Proofing opportunities
2.17 Review ergonomics for material handling, tools, processes, etc.
2.18 Identify cost reduction opportunities
2.19 Determine potential cost impacts of any changes identified
11
JDS-G223X1
3. GAGING REVIEW
3.1 Determine what measuring equipment gages, test fixtures etc. are required
3.2 Determine availability of measuring equipment gages, test fixtures, etc.
3.3 Determine quality or control plan requirements
3.4 Review procedures for drawings and inventory of gages and test fixtures
3.5 Determine how many gages and test fixtures are required
3.6 Determine who will design and build gages and test fixtures
3.7 Review policy for ongoing gage maintenance and calibration
3.8 Identify cost reduction opportunities
3.9 Determine potential cost impacts of any changes identified
4. ASSEMBLY REVIEW
4.1 Review systems listed for Design Reviews in PDP Phase 2 & 3
4.2 Review cleanliness requirements & possible contamination problems
4.3 Review critical product systems - e.g. brakes, Roll Over Protection System
(ROPS), steering, hydraulics, drive train, electrical
4.4 Review hose, line, and wiring routing
4.5 Review appearance, fit, and finish process requirements
4.6 Review linkage adjustment capabilities
4.7 Review fasteners
4.8 Review potential leak, vibration, and noise problems
4.9 Review fit & finish requirements
4.10 Review Operator Method Sheets (OMS)
4.11 Review Sequence of Events (SOE)
4.12 Review assembly instruction requirements
4.13 Review needs for assembly gages and aids
4.14 Review training needs for key assembly characteristic
4.15 Review process for Mistake Proofing opportunities
4.16 Review material handling systems that prevent part damage
4.17 Review torque requirements for key joints
4.18 Review ease of access for assembly
4.19 Review need for assembly fixtures
4.20 Review plans for assembly tools
4.21 Review ability for fluid systems to reach steady state levels
4.22 Review trial installation requirements
4.23 Review special process requirements (bonding, painting, etc.)
4.24 Review performance testing requirements in assembly
4.25 Review and verify specification
4.26 Review ergonomics for material handling, tools, processes, etc.
4.27 Identify cost reduction opportunities
4.28 Determine potential cost impacts of any changes identified
5. PACKAGING REVIEW
5.1 Review requirements for component packaging/returnable containers
5.2 Review the need for temporary sealing for the wash or paint process
5.3 Review packaging & shipping requirements for finished goods, including the need
for rust protection
5.4 Identify cost reduction opportunities
5.5 Determine potential cost impacts of any changes identified
12
JDS-G223X1
13
JDS-G223X1
6
Part Number :
Decision Number :
Supplier Name:
Supplier Number:
Weight/Piece Kg:
Item
Nominal
Dimension /
Specification or
Material
Specifications
Unit of
Measure
Tolerance
(+)
(-)
Yes
No
Measurement Results
Piece
1
Piece
2
Piece
3
Piece
4
OK / John Deere
Not OK Verification
Piece
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Items 26 30 are text applicable.
26
27
28
29
30
Supplier Representative Signature:
Title:
E-Mail:
Date:
Title:
E-Mail:
Date:
Disposition:
Approve
Fail
Deviate
Resubmit
A photograph of the tooling identification tag that is affixed onto John Deere owned tooling must be submitted prior to the approval of
this ISIR. The tooling identification tag must be in compliance with JDS-G223 Addendum Non-Perishable tool Identification
Guidelines for John Deere Suppliers.
14
JDS-G223X1
Date:
Desk No.
Page
of
Part No.
Part Name/ Description
Design Level
Other
Decision Number
Comments:
Supplier - Fill In All Data Below
Is the process for each feature in control, stable and normally distributed?
Yes
No
Dimensional
Requirements
Feature
No.
(Key
Characteristic)
Actual Measurements
P p P pk
R / d 2 C p C pk
Approve
/ Reject
Date:
Disposition:
E-mail: __________________________
Accept
Conditional
Acceptance
Reject
Resubmit
Sample
JDS-G223X1
8
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
16
CHARACTERISTIC
22 No.
23
Product
24
Process
25
Key Characteristic
JDS-G223X1
17
JDS-G223X1
METHODS
26
Product / Process
Specification / Tolerance
27
Evaluation /
Measurement Technique
28
29
Control Method
30
Reaction Plan
18
19
JDS-G223X1
JDS-G223X1
9
20
JDS-G223X1
Part Number:
Supplier Code:
Part Name:
Name of Laboratory:
Revision Level:
Test Specification /
Rev / Date
Specification
/ Limits
Test
Date
Quantity
Tested
NOTE: Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.
Comments:
Submitted By:
E-Mail:
21
Date:
OK
Not
OK
JDS-G223X1
Supplier
Signature:
Report Number
(NCCA / Q-note):
Severity:
John Deere
Location:
Supplier Name:
Supplier ID:
Incidental
Major
Minor
Critical
Supplier
Location:
John Deere Part
Number:
Part Name:
Supplier Part
Number:
Quantity Affected:
STEP
D1
John Deere
Supplier
D2
DESCRIPTION
Establish the Team / Responsibility
Name:
E-Mail:
Telephone:
FAX:
Name:
E-Mail:
Telephone:
FAX:
Enter comments:
22
D3
JDS-G223X1
Responsible Implementation Actual Completion
Persons Name
Target Date
Date
Enter comments:
D4
Define and Verify Root Cause / Cause Responsible Implementation Actual Completion
Persons Name
Target Date
Date
of Nonconformity
Enter comments:
D5
Prevent Recurrence
Enter comments:
D6
Enter comments:
D7
Enter comments:
D8
Enter comments:
NOTE: Containment of nonconforming material is required within 24 hours of problem notification. A status report shall be submitted
to the originator of a John Deere initiated corrective action request (preferred via the Nonconformance Corrective Action (NCCA)
system) within five days from the date of receipt, unless otherwise specified by the John Deere investigator.
23
JDS-G223X1
24
JDS-G223X1
John Deere
Part No.:
EDA
NUMBER:
Part Description:
Models Used On:
Requested By:
Dept Charged:
Quantity Affected:
Proposed Deviation:
Use As Is:
Date:
Reclaim (describe below):
Personnel Contacted:
Telephone Number:
E-Mail Address:
FAX Number:
Date:
Target Date:
Verification
Required?
Yes
No
Assigned To:
REJECTED
Comments:
Authorized
Piece(s) /
For:
Prod. Days
APPROVALS:
Product Engineering
(Required):
Quality Engineering
(Required)
Add to Distribution List:
Use for Service:
Ref. Project
Doc Number
Ref. Decision
or ECN:
Date:
Date:
Yes
No
JDS-G223X1
Manual Sections
5.1
Affinity Diagram
5.2
5.3
5.4
6.1
6.3
7.1
7.2
7.4
7.5
Ref.
7.6
7.7
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
X
X
Box Plot
Brainstorming
5.6
Control Chart
A,B,E,D
Control Plan
B,E,D
FMEA design
FMEA process
X
X
X
Mistake
Proofing
B,C,E
F
A,B,C,E
A,E,D
A,E,D
X
X
X
X
D
E,C
X
X
QFD
X
X
Run Chart
X
Scatter Diagram
Tree Diagram
Root Cause
Analysis
A,B,C,E
D
Problem Solving
Process
Mapping
C,D
PPAP (1st
piece/lot
certification)
Pareto Chart
B,C,E
X
X
Histogram
X
X
Gage R & R
A,C,E,D
X
Flow Chart
Force Field
Analysis
A,B,C
Design of
Experiments
A,C
Capability
Studies
Data Collection
8.5
B,C,E
A,B
Note 1
A = Juran Quality Planning Ready Reference, B = Juran Quality Improvement Pocket Guide, C = Memory
Jogger II Pocket Guide of tools for Continuous Improvement, D = AIAG Manuals, E = Jurans Quality Control
Handbook, and F = John Deere Support contact your John Deere Representative.
26
JDS-G223X1
Method for generating large numbers of ideas and then organizing and
summarizing into groups.
Box Plot
Brainstorming
Capability Studies
Control Chart
Control Plan
Data Collection
Design of Experiments
Flow Chart
FMEA design
FMEA process
Identifies the forces and factors in place that support or work against the
solution.
Gage R & R
Histogram
Mistake Proofing
Pareto Chart
Problem Solving
Process Mapping
QFD
Run Chart
Scatter Diagram
Tree Diagram
JDS-G223X1
15 References
For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments)
applies.
Only John Deere Standards which have been approved for supplier distribution are available via JDSN.
28