Web

Images

More

Sign in

"capable of repetition, yet evading review"

Scholar

My Citations

About 145 results (0.04 sec)

In re Yvonne W.

Articles
Case law
Federal courts
California courts
Select courts...
My library

Any time

165 Cal. App. 4th 1394, 81 Cal. Rptr. 3d - Cal: Court of Appeal, 4th , 2008 - Google Scholar
... 1315-1316 [94 Cal.Rptr.2d 798].) However, a reviewing court may exercise its inherent discretion

to resolve an issue rendered moot by subsequent events if the question to be decided is of

continuing public importance and is a question capable of repetition, yet evading review. ...
Cited by 220 How cited Related articles All 3 versions Cite Save

In re William M.
473 P. 2d 737, 3 Cal. 3d 16, 89 Cal. Rptr. 33 - Cal: Supreme Court, 1970 - Google Scholar
... Rptr. 670, 464 P.2d 126].) But we should not avoid the resolution of important and well litigated

controversies arising from situations which are "capable of repetition, yet evading review."

(Moore v. Ogilvie (1969) 394 US 814, 816 [23 L.Ed.2d 1, 4, 89 S.Ct. ...
Cited by 328 How cited Related articles Cite Save

Since 2016

NBC SUBSIDIARY (KNBC-TV) v. Superior Court

Since 2015

980 P. 2d 337, 86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 778, 20 Cal. 4th - Cal: Supreme , 1999 - Google Scholar
86 Cal.Rptr.2d 778 (1999). 980 P.2d 337. 20 Cal.4th 1178. NBC SUBSIDIARY (KNBC-TV), INC.,

et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Sondra Locke

et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. S056924. Supreme Court of California. ...
Cited by 281 How cited Related articles Cite Save

Since 2012
Custom range...

Sort by relevance
Sort by date

include citations

Create alert

In re Christina A.
111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 310, 91 Cal. App. 4th - Cal: Court of Appeal, 3rd , 2001 - Google Scholar
... 581.). An exception to this rule exists where the question to be decided is of continuing public

importance and is one "`"capable of repetition, yet evading review." `"(Press-Enterprise Co. v.

Superior Court (1986) 478 US 1, 6 [106 S.Ct. 2735, 2739, 92 L.Ed.2d 1, 9]; State of Cal. ...
Cited by 91 How cited Related articles Cite Save

People v. Cheek
24 P. 3d 1204, 108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 181, 25 Cal. - Cal: Supreme , 2001 - Google Scholar
108 Cal.Rptr.2d 181 (2001). 25 Cal.4th 894. 24 P.3d 1204. The PEOPLE, Plaintiff

and Respondent, v. Michael Thomas CHEEK, Defendant and Appellant. No. S083305.

Supreme Court of California. June 21, 2001. 182 Steven ...

Cited by 101 How cited Related articles Cite Save

Thompson v. Department of Corrections

18 P. 3d 1198, 105 Cal. Rptr. 2d 46, 25 Cal. 4th - Cal: Supreme , 2001 - Google Scholar
... Because Thompson has been executed, we could dismiss this proceeding as moot. But when,

as here, an otherwise moot case presents important issues that are "capable of repetition, yet
evading review" (Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC (1911) 219 US 498, 515, 31 S.Ct. ...
Cited by 92 How cited Related articles Cite Save

In re Esperanza C.
165 Cal. App. 4th 1042, 81 Cal. Rptr. 3d - Cal: Court of Appeal, 4th , 2008 - Google Scholar
... Appellants also contend the issue whether the juvenile court has jurisdiction to review

the Agency's denial of an exemption for abuse of discretion is a question of continuing

public importance, and is capable of repetition, yet evading review. ...

Cited by 184 How cited Related articles All 2 versions Cite Save

ALFREDO A. v. Superior Court

865 P. 2d 56, 6 Cal. 4th 1212, 26 Cal. Rptr. 2d - Cal: Supreme , 1994 - Google Scholar
... The Court of Appeal nonetheless determined to hear and decide petitioner's systemic challenge

to the juvenile court's "official position," concluding that similar claims had proved "capable of
repetition, yet evading review" because "review usually takes longer than the ...
Cited by 72 How cited Related articles Cite Save

In re David H.
165 Cal. App. 4th 1626, 82 Cal. Rptr. 3d - Cal: Court of Appeal, 1st , 2008 - Google Scholar
... In her supplemental brief on mootness, however, Mother concedes that her challenge to the

detention order is moot. She urges us to exercise our discretion to decide the issue because

it is an important issue of public interest and is capable of repetition yet evading review. ...
Cited by 157 How cited Related articles All 2 versions Cite Save

CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL BRANCH NEWS SERVICE

CJBNS.ORG