Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Function
2 STRUCTURE
more
SATSAT
takers
More
senior
test takers
more ACT takers
This map of the United States shows the states in which (blue
color) more seniors in the class of 2006 took the SAT than the
ACT, and the states in which (red color) more seniors took the
ACT than the SAT.
Senior Class of 2015
SAT vs. ACT Preference Map
more
SATSAT
takers
More
senior
test takers
more ACT takers
This map of the United States shows the states in which (blue
color) more seniors in the class of 2015 took the SAT than the
ACT, and the states in which (red color) more seniors took the
ACT than the SAT.
2.2 Mathematics
Structure
x +2y =17
2x + 3y = 29
12
.
/
.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
/
.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.3
Writing
There are two 25-minute sections and one 20-minute sec- 2.3
tion, as follows:
One of the 25-minute sections is entirely multiple
choice.
Writing
The writing portion of the SAT, based on but not directly comparable to the old SAT II subject test in writing
(which in turn was developed from the old Test of Standard Written English (TSWE)), includes multiple choice
questions and a brief essay. The essay subscore contributes about 28% to the total writing score, with the
multiple choice questions contributing 70%. This section
was implemented in March 2005 following complaints
from colleges about the lack of uniform examples of a
students writing ability and critical thinking.
In March 2005, Les Perelman analyzed 15 scored sample essays contained in the College Boards ScoreWrite
book along with 30 other training samples and found that
in over 90% of cases, the essays score could be predicted from simply counting the number of words in the
essay.[21] Two years later, Perelman trained high school
seniors to write essays that made little sense but contained infrequently used words such as plethora and
myriad. All of the students received scores of 10 or
better, which placed the essays in the 92nd percentile or Candidates whose religious beliefs prevent them from
higher.[22]
taking the test on a Saturday may request to take the test
on the following day, except for the October test date in
which the Sunday test date is eight days after the main
test oering. Such requests must be made at the time of
2.4 Style of questions
registration and are subject to denial.
Most of the questions on the SAT, except for the essay Students with veriable disabilities, including physical
and the grid-in math responses, are multiple choice; all and learning disabilities, are eligible to take the SAT with
multiple-choice questions have ve answer choices, one accommodations. The standard time increase for stuof which is correct. The questions of each section of the dents requiring additional time due to learning disabilities
same type are generally ordered by diculty. However, is time + 50%; time + 100% is also oered.
an important exception exists: Questions that follow the
long and short reading passages are organized chronologically, rather than by diculty. Ten of the questions in one
of the math sub-sections are not multiple choice. They
instead require the test taker to bubble in a number in a
four-column grid.
The questions are weighted equally. For each correct answer, one raw point is added. For each incorrect answer
one quarter of a point is deducted.[23] No points are deducted for incorrect math grid-in questions. This ensures
that a students mathematically expected gain from guessing is zero. The nal score is derived from the raw score;
the precise conversion chart varies between test administrations.
The SAT therefore recommends only making educated
guesses, that is, when the test taker can eliminate at least
one answer he or she thinks is wrong. Without eliminating any answers ones probability of answering correctly is
20%. Eliminating one wrong answer increases this probability to 25% (and the expected gain to 1/16 of a point);
two, a 33.3% probability (1/6 of a point); and three, a
50% probability (3/8 of a point).
Logistics
In 2015 the average score for the Class of 2015 was 1490
out of a maximum 2400. That was down 7 points from
the previous classs mark and was the lowest composite
score of the past decade.[28]
6.2
1926 test
History
540
535
530
525
520
515
510
505
500
495
490
485
480
475
470
465
460
455
450
445
440
435
430
425
420
415
410
1952
1958
1964
1970
1976
1988
1994
2000
2006
2012
2018
6.1
6.6
HISTORY
6.11
were scoring between 340 and 500 on the verbal section 6.11 2002 changes Score Choice
and between 380 and 560 on the math section, with corresponding median scores of 420 and 470, respectively.[42] In October 2002, the College Board dropped the Score
The drop in SAT verbal scores, in particular, meant that Choice Option for SAT-II exams. Under this option,
until the student saw
the usefulness of the SAT score scale (200 to 800) had scores were not released to colleges
[46]
and
approved
of
the
score.
The
College Board has
become degraded. At the top end of the verbal scale,
since
decided
to
re-implement
Score
Choice
in the spring
signicant gaps were occurring between raw scores and
of
2009.
It
is
described
as
optional,
and
it
is
not clear if
uncorrected scaled scores: a perfect raw score no longer
the
reports
sent
will
indicate
whether
or
not
this
student
corresponded to an 800, and a single omission out of 85
has
opted-in
or
not.
A
number
of
highly
selective
colquestions could lead to a drop of 30 or 40 points in the
leges
and
universities,
including
Yale,
the
University
of
scaled score. Corrections to scores above 700 had been
Pennsylvania,
and
Stanford,
have
announced
they
will
renecessary to reduce the size of the gaps and to make a
perfect raw score result in an 800. At the other end of the quire applicants to submit all scores. Stanford, however,
[47]
scale, about 1.5 percent of test takers would have scored only prohibits Score Choice for the traditional SAT.
below 200 on the verbal section if that had not been the Others, such as MIT and Harvard, have fully embraced
reported minimum score. Although the math score av- Score Choice.
erages were closer to the center of the scale (500) than
the verbal scores, the distribution of math scores was no
longer well approximated by a normal distribution. These 6.12 2005 changes
problems, among others, suggested that the original score
scale and its reference group of about 10,000 students In 2005, the test was changed again, largely in response
to criticism by the University of California system.[48]
taking the SAT in 1941 needed to be replaced.[33]
Because of issues concerning ambiguous questions, esBeginning with the test administered in April 1995, the pecially analogies, certain types of questions were elimSAT score scale was recentered to return the average inated (the analogies from the verbal and quantitative
math and verbal scores close to 500. Although only 25 comparisons from the Math section). The test was made
students had received perfect scores of 1600 in all of marginally harder, as a corrective to the rising number
1994, 137 students taking the April test scored a 1600.[43] of perfect scores. A new writing section, with an essay,
The new scale used a reference group of about one million based on the former SAT II Writing Subject Test, was
seniors in the class of 1990: the scale was designed so that added,[49] in part to increase the chances of closing the
the SAT scores of this cohort would have a mean of 500 opening gap between the highest and midrange scores.
and a standard deviation of 110. Because the new scale Other factors included the desire to test the writing abilwould not be directly comparable to the old scale, scores ity of each student; hence the essay. The New SAT was
awarded on April 1995 and later were ocially reported rst oered on March 12, 2005, after the last administrawith an R (for example, 560R) to reect the change in tion of the old SAT in January 2005. The Mathematics
scale, a practice that was continued until 2001.[33] Scores section was expanded to cover three years of high school
awarded before April 1995 may be compared to the those mathematics. The Verbal sections name was changed to
on the recentered scale by using ocial College Board the Critical Reading section.
tables. For example, verbal and math scores of 500 received before 1995 correspond to scores of 580 and 520,
respectively, on the 1995 scale.[44]
In March 2006, it was announced that a small percentage of the SATs taken in October 2005 had been scored
incorrectly due to the test papers being moist and not
scanning properly, and that some students had received
erroneous scores.[50] The College Board announced they
would change the scores for the students who were given
a lower score than they earned, but at this point many
of those students had already applied to colleges using
their original scores. The College Board decided not to
change the scores for the students who were given a higher
score than they earned. A lawsuit was led in 2006 on
behalf of the 4,411 students who received an incorrect
score on the SAT.[51] The class-action suit was settled in
August 2007 when the College Board and Pearson Educational Measurement, the company that scored the SAT
8
tests, announced they would pay $2.85 million into a settlement fund. Under the agreement each student could
either elect to receive $275 or submit a claim for more
money if he or she felt the damage was greater.[52] A
similar scoring error occurred on a secondary school admission test in 2010-2011 when the ERB (Educational
Records Bureau) announced after the admission process
was over that an error had been made in the scoring of
the tests of 2010 (17%) of the students who had taken the
Independent School Entrance Examination for admission
to private secondary schools for 2011. Commenting on
the eect of the error on students school applications in
the New York Times, David Clune, President of the ERB
stated It is a lesson we all learn at some point that life
isnt fair.[53]
10.3
9
with the students study habits and motivation to succeed.
As with racial bias, this correlation with income could
also be due to the social class of the makers of the test,
although empirical research suggests that poorer students
actually perform worse on 'neutral' than such 'privileged'
questions.[69]
10
10.1
Perception
Association with culture
10.2
10
10 PERCEPTION
SAT, whereas white and Asian students tended to have a California, urged dropping the SAT as a college admisslight advantage on questions labeled as easy. Freedle ar- sions requirement:
gued that these ndings suggest that easy test items use
vocabulary that is easier to understand for white middle
Anyone involved in education should be
class students than for minorities, who often use a dierconcerned about how overemphasis on the
ent language in the home environment, whereas the difSAT is distorting educational priorities and
cult items use complex language learned only through
practices, how the test is perceived by many
lectures and textbooks, giving both student groups equal
as unfair, and how it can have a devastating
opportunities to acquiring it.[79][80] [81] The study was
impact on the self-esteem and aspirations of
severely criticized by the ETS board, but the ndings were
young students. There is widespread agreereplicated in a subsequent study by Santelices and Wilson
ment that overemphasis on the SAT harms
in 2010.[82][83]
American education.[86]
There is no evidence that SAT scores systematically
underestimate future performance of minority students. In response to threats by the University of California to
However, the predictive validity of the SAT has been drop the SAT as an admission requirement, the College
shown to depend on the dominant ethnic and racial com- Entrance Examination Board announced the restructurposition of the college.[84] Some studies have also shown ing of the SAT, to take eect in March 2005, as detailed
that African American students under-perform in col- above.
lege relative to their white peers with the same SAT test
In the 1960s and 1970s there was a movement to drop
scores; researchers have argued that this is likely because
achievement scores. After a period of time, the counwhite students tend to benet from social advantages outtries, states and provinces that reintroduced them agreed
side of the educational environment (for example, high
that academic standards had dropped, students had studparental involvement in their education, inclusion in camied less, and had taken their studying less seriously. They
pus academic activities, positive bias from same-race
reintroduced the tests after studies and research con[76]
teachers and peers) which result in better grades.
cluded that the high-stakes tests produced benets that
Christopher Jencks concludes that as a group African outweighed the costs.[87]
Americans have been harmed by the introduction of standardized entrance exams such as the SAT. This, according to him, is not because the tests themselves are 10.6 IQ studies
awed, but because of labeling bias and selection bias;
the tests measure the skills that African Americans are Frey and Detterman (2003) investigated associations of
less likely to develop in their socialization, rather than SAT scores with intelligence test scores. Using an estithe skills they are more likely to develop. Furthermore, mate of general mental ability, or g, based on the ASVAB
standardized entrance exams are commonly perceived as test battery, which can be best thought of as representtests of general ability, rather than of certain aspects of ing crystallized intelligence (learned abilities), they found
ability. Thus, a situation is produced in which African SAT scores to be highly correlated with g (r=.82 in their
American ability is consistently underestimated within sample, .857 when adjusted for non-linearity) in their
the education and workplace environments, contributing sample taken from a 1979 national probability survey.
in turn to selection bias against them which exacerbates Additionally, they investigated the correlation between
SAT results, using the revised and recentered form of
underachievement.[76]
the test, and scores on the Ravens Advanced Progressive
Matrices, a test of uid intelligence (reasoning), this time
10.5 Dropping SAT
using a non-random sample. They found that the correlation of SAT results with scores on the Ravens AdA growing number of colleges have joined the SAT op- vanced Progressive Matrices was .483. They estimated
tional movement. These colleges do not require the SAT that this latter correlation would have been about 0.72
for admission.
were it not for the restriction of ability range in the samOne example of a college that did this is Drew Univer- ple. They also noted that there appeared to be a ceiling
scores which may have suppressed
sity in New Jersey. After they adopted an optional SAT eect on the Ravens
[88]
Beaujean
and colleagues (2006) have
the
correlation.
policy, they had a 20% increase in applications. Dean
reached
similar
conclusions
to
those reached by Frey and
of Admissions Mary Beth Carey says that Our own re[89]
Detterman.
search showed us that high school grade point average is
by far the most important predictor of success in college.
The college reported that they accepted their most diverse
10.7
class ever as a result of the policy.[85]
Preparation
In a 2001 speech to the American Council on Education, SAT preparation is a highly lucrative eld[90] and many
Richard C. Atkinson, the president of the University of companies and organizations oer test preparation in
11
the form of books, classes, online courses, and tutoring. The test preparation industry began almost simultaneously with the introduction of university entrance exams in the U.S. and ourished from the start.[91]
determined correctly over 90% of the time. He also discovered that several of these essays were full of factual
errors; the College Board does not claim to grade for factual accuracy.
Montgomery and Lilly (2012) performed a systematic literature review of all published SAT coaching research
in search of high quality studies (dened as those with
randomized controlled trials). They found that the randomized treatments resulted in V/M gains of +23/32
points for a total of +56; the high quality study that
showed the highest score increase was Johnson (1984;
San Francisco) which was based on a 30-hour prep course
that showed an average increase of 178 points. The Johnson San Francisco study was also the only high quality
study found on a prep course of 30 hours or more in
length, although validity of this outlier study is uncertain
due to the attrition of half the participants.[91]
10.8
Certain high IQ societies, like Mensa, the Prometheus Society and the Triple Nine Society, use scores from certain
years as one of their admission tests. For instance, the
Triple Nine Society accepts scores of 1450 on tests taken
before April 1995, and scores of at least 1520 on tests
taken between April 1995 and February 2005.[95]
The SAT is sometimes given to students younger than
13 by organizations such as the Study of Mathematically
Precocious Youth, Johns Hopkins Center for Talented
Youth, Duke TIP, and other organizations who use the
results to select, study and mentor students of exceptional
ability.
10.9
Writing section
In 2005, MIT Writing Director Les Perelman plotted essay length versus essay score on the new SAT from released essays and found a high correlation between them.
After studying over 50 graded essays, he found that longer
essays consistently produced higher scores. In fact, he argues that by simply gauging the length of an essay without reading it, the given score of an essay could likely be
11 See also
ACT (test), a college entrance exam, competitor to
the SAT
College admissions in the United States
List of admissions tests
PSAT/NMSQT
SAT Subject Tests
12 References
[1] 2015 College-Bound Seniors Total Group Prole Report (PDF). College Board. Retrieved December 20,
2015.
[2] Fees And Costs. The College Board. Retrieved October
13, 2014.
[3] Frequently Asked Questions About ETS. ETS. Retrieved June 6, 2014.
[4] Baird, Katherine (2012). Trapped in Mediocrity: Why Our
Schools Aren't World-Class and What We Can Do About
It. Lanham: Rowman and Littleeld Publishers. And
a separate process that began in 1926 was complete by
1942: the much easier SAT--a test not aligned to any particular curriculum and thus better suited to a nation where
high school students did not take a common curriculum-replaced the old college boards as the nationss college
entrance exam. This broke the once tight link between
academic coursework and college admission, a break that
remains to this day.
[5] SAT Fees: 201011 Fees. College Board. Retrieved
September 5, 2010.
[6] O'Shaughnessy, Lynn (July 26, 2009). The Other Side
of 'Test Optional'". The New York Times. p. 6. Retrieved
June 22, 2011.
[7] Lewin, Tamar (March 5, 2014). A New SAT Aims to
Realign With Schoolwork. The New York Times. Retrieved May 14, 2014.
12
12
[8] Ocial SAT Reasoning Test page. College Board. Retrieved June 2007.
[9] Atkinson, Richard; Geiser, Saul (May 4, 2015). The Big
Problem With the New SAT. The New York Times (New
York: The New York Times Company). Retrieved January 29, 2016.
[10] 01-249.RD.ResNoteRN-10 collegeboard.com (PDF).
The College Board. Retrieved October 13, 2014.
[11] Geiser, Saul; Studley, Roger (October 29, 2001), UC and
the SAT: Predictive Validity and Dierential Impact of the
SAT I ad SAT II at the University of California (PDF), University of California, Oce of the President.
[12] Korbin, L. (2006). SAT Program Handbook. A Comprehensive Guide to the SAT Program for School Counselors
and Admissions Ocers, 1, 33+. Retrieved January 24,
2006, from College Board Preparation Database.
[13] Atkinson, R. C.; Geiser, S. (2009). Reections on a
Century of College Admissions Tests. Educational Researcher 38 (9): 665676.
[14] Honawar, Vaishali; Klein, Alyson (August 30, 2006).
ACT Scores Improve; More on East Coast Taking the
SATs Rival. Education Week.
[15] Slatalla, Michelle (November 4, 2007). ACT vs. SAT.
New York Times.
[16] Colleges and Universities That Do Not Use SAT/ACT
Scores for Admitting Substantial Numbers of Students
Into Bachelor Degree Programs. fairtest.org. The National Center for Fair & Open Testing. Retrieved 29 May
2015.
[17] Marklein, Mary Beth (March 18, 2007). All four-year
U.S. colleges now accept ACT test. USA Today.
[18] SAT FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions. College
Board. Archived from the original on March 25, 2008.
Retrieved May 29, 2007.
[19] collegeboard.org. The College Board. Retrieved October 13, 2014.
[20] collegeboard.org; Calculator Use and the SAT
REFERENCES
[21] Winerip, Michael (May 5, 2005). SAT Essay Test Rewards Length and Ignores Errors. New York Times. Retrieved March 6, 2008.
[37] Honan, William (March 20, 1994). Revised and Renamed, S.A.T. Brings Same Old Anxiety. New York
Times.
Collegeboard.
Retrieved
[39] Scholastic Assessment Test Score Averages for HighSchool College-Bound Seniors. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved May 23, 2014.
[40] The College Handbook, 1985-86. New York: College Entrance Examination Board. 1985. p. 953.
13
[56] http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/
sat-score-use-practices-list.pdf
[57] Test Security and Fairness. The College Board. Retrieved October 13, 2014.
[76] Jencks, C. (1998). Racial bias in testing. The BlackWhite test score gap, 55, 84.
[78] Ogbu, John U. (3 January 2003). Black American Students in An Auent Suburb: A Study of Academic Disengagement (Sociocultural, Political, and Historical Studies in
Education). New York: Routledge. pp. 16, 164. ISBN
978-0805845167.
14
13 FURTHER READING
insidehigh-
[83] Santelices, M. V., & Wilson, M. (2010). Unfair treatment? The case of Freedle, the SAT, and the standardization approach to dierential item functioning. Harvard
Educational Review, 80(1), 106-134.
[84] Fleming, Ol (2002). Who will succeed in college? When
the SAT predicts Black students performance. The Review of Higher Education, 25(3), 281-296.
[85] Gilroy, Marilyn (December 2007). Colleges Making
SAT Optional as Admissions Requirement. Education
Digest 73 (4): 3539. Retrieved October 5, 2013.
[86] Achievement Versus Aptitude Tests in College Admissions
[87] Phelps, Richard (2003). Kill the Messenger. New
Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. p. 220.
ISBN 0-7658-0178-7.
[88] Frey, M. C.; Detterman, D. K. (2003). Scholastic
Assessment or g?
The Relationship Between the
Scholastic Assessment Test and General Cognitive
Ability (PDF). Psychological Science 15 (6): 373
378. doi:10.1111/Ol0956-7976.2004.00687.x. PMID
15147489.
[89] Beaujean, A. A.; Firmin, M. W.; Knoop, A. Ol; Michonski, Ol D.; Berry, T. B.; Lowrie, R. E. (2006). Validation
of the Frey and Detterman (2004) IQ prediction equations using the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales
(PDF). Personality and Individual Dierences 41: 353
357. doi:10.1016/Olpaid.2006.01.014.
[90] Research and Markets ltd. 2009 Worldwide Exam
Preparation & Tutoring Industry Report. researchandmarkets.com.
[91] Montgomery, Paul; Lilly, Jane (2012). Systematic Reviews of the Eects of Preparatory Courses on University Entrance Examinations in High School-Age Students
(PDF). International Journal of Social Welfare 21 (1): 3
12.
[92] Allen Grove. SAT Prep - Are SAT Prep Courses Worth
the Cost?". About.com Education.
[93] Je Grabmeier (August 7, 2006). SAT TEST PREP
TOOLS GIVE ADVANTAGE TO STUDENTS FROM
WEALTHIER FAMILIES. Ohio State University. Retrieved February 23, 2014.
[94] Scott Jaschik (May 20, 2009). Test Prep, to What End?".
Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved February 23, 2014.
[95] triplenine.org
[96] Winerip, Michael (May 4, 2005). SAT Essay Test Rewards Length and Ignores Errors. The New York Times.
[97] Harris, Lynn (May 17, 2005).
Salon.com.
Testing, testing.
13 Further reading
Balf, Todd (March 6, 2014). The Story Behind the
SAT Overhaul. The New York Times Magazine.
Lewin, Tamar (March 5, 2014). A New SAT Aims
to Realign With Schoolwork. The New York Times.
Key shifts of the SAT redesign. The Washington
Post. March 5, 2014.
Coyle, T. R. & Pillow, D. R. (2008). SAT
and ACT predict college GPA after removing g".
Intelligence 36 (6): 719729.
doi:10.1016/Olintell.2008.05.001.
Coyle, T.; Snyder, A.; Pillow, D.; Kochunov,
P. (2011).
SAT predicts GPA better for
high ability subjects: Implications for Spearmans Law of Diminishing Returns. Personality and Individual Dierences 50 (4): 470
474. doi:10.1016/Olpaid.2010.11.009. PMID
21562615.
Frey, M. C.; Detterman, D. K. (2003). Scholastic
Assessment or g? The Relationship Between the
Scholastic Assessment Test and General Cognitive
Ability (PDF). Psychological Science 15 (6): 373
378.
doi:10.1111/Ol0956-7976.2004.00687.x.
PMID 15147489.
Gould, Stephen Jay (1996). The Mismeasure of Man
(Rev/Expd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN
0-393-31425-1.
Homan, Banesh (1962). The Tyranny of Testing.
Orig. pub. Collier. ISBN 0-486-43091-X. (and others)
Hubin, David R. (1988). The Scholastic Aptitude
Test: Its Development and Introduction, 19001948.
Ph.D. dissertation in American History at the University of Oregon.
Owen, David (1999). None of the Above: The Truth
Behind the SATs (Revised ed.). Rowman & Littleeld. ISBN 0-8476-9507-7.
Sacks, Peter (2001). Standardized Minds: The High
Price of Americas Testing Culture and What We Can
Do to Change It. Perseus. ISBN 0-7382-0433-1.
Zwick, Rebecca (2002). Fair Game? The Use of
Standardized Admissions Tests in Higher Education.
Falmer. ISBN 0-415-92560-6.
15
Gladwell, Malcolm (December 17, 2001).
Examined Life: What Stanley H. Kaplan taught us
about the S.A.T.. The New Yorker.
14
External links
Ocial website
College Board research website
16
15
15
15.1
SAT Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT?oldid=711374762 Contributors: Eloquence, Vicki Rosenzweig, Andre Engels, Ortolan88,
SimonP, DavidLevinson, Isis~enwiki, Frecklefoot, Voidvector, Vera Cruz, Shellreef, Ahoerstemeier, Docu, Angela, Glenn, Jiang, Samw,
Ilyanep, Stefan Khn, Saint-Paddy, Nohat, Paul Stansifer, Andrewman327, MattH, WhisperToMe, Zoicon5, Maximus Rex, David Shay,
Saltine, Lypheklub, Mckreck, Scarequotes, Opus33, Fvw, Rbellin, Johnleemk, Camerong, UninvitedCompany, RadicalBender, Huangdi,
Riddley, Shinyplasticbag, SecretAgent, Sdedeo, Pigsonthewing, Psychonaut, Auric, Aleron235, Hadal, HaeB, Asparagus, Seth Ilys, Wile E.
Heresiarch, Decrypt3, DocWatson42, Marcika, Everyking, Perl, Splatg, Hecatonchires, Acornlord, Iota, Bgoldenberg, Bobblewik, Wmahan, Chowbok, Utcursch, OverlordQ, Andy5, Kesac, Ary29, Saopaulo1, Maarten Hermans, Sam Hocevar, Aerion, Neutrality, Slidewinder,
Joyous!, Ropers, Calwatch, Monkeyman, Mindspillage, Naryathegreat, Discospinster, Brutannica, Clawed, Vapour, Ponder, Paul August, Bender235, Rusty, CanisRufus, Sfahey, Rgdboer, The bellman, Shanes, Orlady, Coolcaesar, Bobo192, Sortior, Reinyday, Jag123,
Sasquatch, TheProject, Ikana, Anonymous Cow, Minhnd, Alansohn, Gary, CR7, ABCD, Spangineer, Snowolf, Angelic Wraith, Godheval, Quintin3265, Omphaloscope, Derbeth, Zxcvbnm, Versageek, Recury, Nightstallion, Dd2, Drummond, Preost, Simetrical, Georgia
guy, Tripodics, Regre7, AtainkP, Toiletduck, Tobb, Btyner, Justy329, Yst, Brownsteve, Dysepsion, RichardWeiss, Niweed17, BD2412,
Kane5187, Edison, Search4Lancer, Rjwilmsi, Zbxgscqf, NatusRoma, Tangotango, Jollybengali, Sohmc, ElKevbo, Brighterorange, Tomtheman5, Ttwaring, Karma Thief, SNIyer12, Sheldrake, TonyGiunta, Exeunt, Ealex292, FlaBot, Massachusetts2005, SchuminWeb, Who,
Phoenix2~enwiki, King of Hearts, Chobot, Moocha, DVdm, Digitalme, Samwaltz, Whosasking, Zimbabweed, Flcelloguy, YurikBot,
Wavelength, Jimp, Cyferx, Kiscica, Tetzcatlipoca, Crazytales, Armistej, SpuriousQ, Testmasters, Hydrargyrum, Gaius Cornelius, Cryptic, Brian Sisco, NawlinWiki, DragonHawk, Bruguiea, Cmdrbond, Grafen, Sirrecneps, Jaxl, Introgressive, Howcheng, JDoorjam, Ragesoss, PhilipO, Bobak, David Pierce, Zwobot, Syrthiss, Aaron Schulz, Gokugohan382, DRosenbach, Maunus, Threeonezero, Wknight94,
Weien, Theodolite, Th1rt3en, Livitup, Natgoo, Kier07, Peter, Ybbor, Kungfuadam, Andrew73, Asterion, Stumps, WikiFew, JaredR,
Jagz, Otheus, SmackBot, TheBilly, Classiclms, KnowledgeOfSelf, Jonyyeh, Mr. Tibbs, Cyane, Delldot, Jab843, Brent2715, Jpvinall,
David Fuchs, LittleRoughRhinestone, Robsomebody, Yamaguchi , Gilliam, Portillo, Ohnoitsjamie, Andy M. Wang, Amatulic, Webmacster87, Keegan, TimBentley, JordeeBec, Feinstein, Persian Poet Gal, Nadiasama, Tito4000, Justforasecond, P-unit, DroEsperanto, Legoman762005, SchftyThree, NicAgent, DHN-bot~enwiki, Colonies Chris, Darth Panda, Yanksox, Chtit draco, Brideshead, Anabus, Xchbla423, Wingspantt, Can't sleep, clown will eat me, SiriusAlphaCMa, Jahiegel, Scray, Onorem, Georey Gibson, Azumanga1, TKD, Lapisphil, Xerxes855, Addshore, Cybercobra, Decltype, Coolbho3000, Nakon, Savidan, Wilhim, Bulldog123, Jugbo, Ck lostsword, Wikipedical,
Birdman1, Dooga Aetrus Blackrazor, Twigge, Lambiam, Esrever, Krashlandon, Aled D, Rsdio, Zahid Abdassabur, Ram32110, Kuru,
Khazar, Darkildor, Dreslough, Scientizzle, Heimstern, CrashMex, Bspittle, Gobonobo, Gbaby247, Lazylaces, Breno, Aleenf1, Slakr,
ObieGrad, Xunex, Stwalkerster, Jackhammer111, Sharcho, Ryulong, Zapvet, Yodaat, Levineps, Avimegiddo, Iridescent, Joseph Solis
in Australia, Omk 489, Funetikahl, Lenoxus, LadyofShalott, Civil Engineer III, Adambiswanger1, Jasebasketball, Proxpero, Tawkerbot2,
Pi, Timrem, Nsfmc, Fvasconcellos, Cybersome, SkyWalker, JForget, Cynical Jawa, CmdrObot, Crownjewel82, Gigaslav, TheMightyOrb,
Juhachi, Shandris, VanishedUser30023402384023, Cydebot, Reywas92, Monica Guerrero~enwiki, Gogo Dodo, Gsingh2300, Zginder,
Arthurian Legend, Jwray1, Tawkerbot4, Christian75, Chrislk02, CollegeLab, Emmett5, Zalgo, Thijs!bot, Epbr123, Lord Hawk, Wikid77,
Dasani, Faigl.ladislav, Steve Dufour, Larsiachi, Smile a While, Cmyaseen, Whooooooknows, AgentPeppermint, EdJohnston, Roddaut,
Coumarin, Heroeswithmetaphors, Railer 505, Ru52, Sherbrooke, Handface, AntiVandalBot, Konman72, Reyals, Luna Santin, Seaphoto,
QuiteUnusual, Audball, Chineseboy1991, Exteray, Joe Schmedley, Adam Chlipala, Lpc, Farosdaughter, JimDunning, Malcolm, Smcmanus, Qwerty Binary, Arx Fortis, Campaigner80, Medora, JAnDbot, Barek, MER-C, Db099221, Albany NY, Robertlowe, Tstrobaugh,
Iovis Fulmen, Promking, Meeples, Connormah, Antelan, Bongwarrior, VoABot II, Maheshkumaryadav, Paul Haymon, Froid, Brusegadi,
Foochar, Anirazarina, Catgut, Nilane, Nposs, 28421u2232nfenfcenc, Jpwynn, Allstarecho, Japo, David Eppstein, Forgachandras, Spellmaster, Dirigible Plum, Gwern, Tantalize92, Flowanda, Hdt83, MartinBot, Lginger, Rettetast, Mike6271, Keith D, Jay Litman, Mschel,
R'n'B, Tgeairn, N4nojohn, Julia lau, Paranomia, J.delanoy, Funkajunka, Trusilver, Hom sepanta, Mattnad, Scj2315, Grreat2, Ian.thomson,
ToxicAllure, Letter M, Naniwako, Canadian Scouter, Pyrospirit, Belovedfreak, NewEnglandYankee, Rwessel, Iulus Ascanius, Wavemaster447, Fylwind, Alastair.mcleod, Limetolime, Suneeth 152, Ferrett3, Qoou.Anonimu, Ja 62, Useight, SoCalSuperEagle, Neinfraulein,
Boobnoob, Sooner Dave, Lights, X!, Aigrette, VolkovBot, Cabdirazzaq, ROxBo, Grrrrrgrrrennn, Ryan032, WOSlinker, Philip Trueman,
TXiKiBoT, Oshwah, Deleet, Malinaccier, Vaidya rohan, Wikipediatoperfection, Sazesq, JonathanSchumacher, Flopster2, Cerebellum,
LeaveSleaves, PDFbot, Natg 19, Garsha, Elasisulla, Bored Human, Wolfrock, Leproman, Joseph A. Spadaro, Groupthink, Falcon8765,
VanBuren, Iamafag, Seresin, A Raider Like Indiana, Insanity Incarnate, Xbox360man~enwiki, Twooars, AlleborgoBot, Otgu311, Chinaman88, NHRHS2010, TheXenocide, CMBJ, Sergwiki, Stevenxu410, Viggio, EJF, Rtmag, DVD Coaster, SieBot, Moonriddengirl, SheepNotGoats, Hertz1888, Kevinmac81, ChrisB600, Caltas, Optim2007, X-Fi6, Yintan, Calabraxthis, Reneperezx, Garbeld, Zachwii, Damanmundine1, Bentogoa, Socal gal at heart, Soknee, JSpung, Antonio Lopez, Thehotelambush, Lightmouse, Callidior, Joe mama412, SpartanJames, Unfreeride, Realm of Shadows, Sempre30, Xelas211, Denisarona, Joe54897415, Hyper222, ClueBot, Victor Chmara, Samuel
Grant, Diabolical.now, Wikievil666, Hedawei21, Supertouch, RNKCHICAGO1963, Boing! said Zebedee, Piledhigheranddeeper, CharlieRCD, Grandpallama, Excirial, Alexbot, Waiwai933, Erebus Morgaine, Resoru, Lperelman, Wordwright, Smalldude71178, Ss190998,
Razorame, ANOMALY-117, La Pianista, Chaosdruid, Thingg, Ziggyman222, 7, Footballfan190, BlueDevil, MelonBot, Vanished user
uih38riiw4hjlsd, Jpf2008, DumZiBoT, Finalnight, InternetMeme, XLinkBot, PvtKing, Nathan Johnson, Azaz129, Brickcheney, Alek999,
Little Mountain 5, ZooFari, MystBot, Thatguyint, Wierd al 101, Addbot, Valpuchi, AVand, Some jerk on the Internet, Guoguo12, Lilsby,
Lauinbeta, Ronhjones, Jncraton, CanadianLinuxUser, Download, Wikieditsta, Oblogathon, Droycehelmuth, 5 albert square, Guydrawers, Squandermania, Sangam Mulmi, Tide rolls, Bguras puppy, Lightbot, Matj Grabovsk, Innapoy, LuK3, Tsimpson000, Luckas-bot,
Yobot, Andreasmperu, Alonso McLaren, IW.HG, Prodigenius, Greatdayatbeach, AnomieBOT, AmritasyaPutra, ErikTheBikeMan, Sanahoria, Ulric1313, Materialscientist, E235, Benjaminchiang, TheTechieGeek63, Citation bot, OllieFury, F.u.c.k all tests and exams!, LilHelpa, Codicorumus, Yiyi1064, Richardyoon, Koektrommel, Tests and exams are bullsh1t! (returns), Engineering Guy, Capricorn42,
4twenty42o, Nasnema, SAT4Life, Grim23, Anna Frodesiak, Tomwsulcer, Samlee1890, Potentenum, Aldo samulo, Travrsa, August99us,
Transmissionelement, Kitlamoureux, Jonas2007, Amandaa70, JoshAnish, Sad Hippopotamus, Fucccccck ypu!, Jilkmarine, FrescoBot,
Educator1952, Clarkkentguy, Wikipe-tan, Leisurist, Marieung, Bobbij, Miamiheat204, NateDesmond, Dualank, OgreBot, Citation bot
1, Shadowkami, Dylandlima, Biker Biker, Pinethicket, Jonesey95, Hamtechperson, The.megapode, NarSakSasLee, Bobbler123, Merlion444, Seth Weidman, Trappist the monk, Ifandonlybut, Vrenator, Wikifan798, Valuedcustomerman, Astercom~enwiki, Diannaa, Howief
(WMF), Minimac, Xnn, DARTH SIDIOUS 2, RjwilmsiBot, Varsi23, DASHBot, Mukogodo, John of Reading, Erjwiki, Stevesmith1385,
Segenay, Katherine, Bernard Teo, RenamedUser01302013, NotAnonymous0, Tommy2010, Princess Lirin, K6ka, Rkononenko, Metsamies, ZroBot, Traxs7, WeijiBaikeBianji, Hazard-SJ, Geno the Great, H3llBot, Rspence1234, Jimlech, Wayne Slam, Axxonnre,
Stervekim, L Kensington, Ready, Silverturtle1, Donner60, Banerjeeballa, Fsenior, Faizak, ManuellaNeves, DASHBotAV, Wicklibrarian,
15.2
Images
17
28bot, SMARTESTPERSONINUK, Mikhail Ryazanov, ClueBot NG, Faizanalivarya, Lordweiner27, Yestoyohll, Georgekrobinson, Winston786, Asukite, Marechal Ney, Iseewhatyoudont, Widr, Chinalovergirl123, WikiPuppies, MillingMachine, Helpful Pixie Bot, APG314,
DBigXray, Insane21m, BG19bot, TGilmour, Lluser77, Juro2351, SendMyRootsRain, Smulumudi, Synester101, Metricopolus, Creaturemonster, Mark Arsten, Witch Hazell, Kebodle1, Preeminence21, Sn1per, Bulow21, BattyBot, Jhjoo617, Pratyya Ghosh, Myxomatosis57,
Soulbust, Esszet, Tow, Cup o' Java, Iman servatjoo, Zeeyanwiki, Mkashif493, Mogism, Cerabot~enwiki, Cheerioswithmilk, SteenthIWbot,
Zziccardi, Njneilvin 2000, Littlecheri, Epicgenius, Dr Dinosaur IV, XndrK, Vannigoc, Jakec, RomanGrandpa, Gobbleygook, JoshuaChen,
Rohansb.bha03, TDJankins, Inabendis, Jrksimon, TCMemoire, Punkshal, Rtedb, Bananaman11, Ttlaz123, JaconaFrere, Bostonforever95,
Monkbot, MisterDoctorPepper, Hanseer360, Cm720, Adityanarayan1412, Liance, Catinthehat123456789, Sourwarheads, Johnswahoo,
EnriqueJ, Kuppa yogesh, Brecapla000, Wsendis, Baddiellm, Mayank2496, Abood19671, GSS-1987, Kanadan29 and Anonymous: 1270
15.2
Images
18
15
File:Flag_of_Indonesia.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9f/Flag_of_Indonesia.svg License: Public domain Contributors: Law: s:id:Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2009 (http://badanbahasa.kemdiknas.go.id/
lamanbahasa/sites/default/files/UU_2009_24.pdf) Original artist: Drawn by User:SKopp, rewritten by User:Gabbe
File:Flag_of_Iran.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Flag_of_Iran.svg License: Public domain Contributors: URL http://www.isiri.org/portal/files/std/1.htm and an English translation / interpretation at URL http://flagspot.net/flags/ir'.html
Original artist: Various
File:Flag_of_Ireland.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/45/Flag_of_Ireland.svg License: Public domain
Contributors: Drawn by User:SKopp Original artist: ?
File:Flag_of_Israel.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/Flag_of_Israel.svg License: Public domain Contributors: http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/History/Modern%20History/Israel%20at%2050/The%20Flag%20and%20the%20Emblem Original artist: The Provisional Council of State Proclamation of the Flag of the State of Israel of 25 Tishrei 5709 (28 October 1948) provides
the ocial specication for the design of the Israeli ag.
File:Flag_of_Italy.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/03/Flag_of_Italy.svg License: PD Contributors: ? Original
artist: ?
File:Flag_of_Japan.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/9e/Flag_of_Japan.svg License: PD Contributors: ? Original artist: ?
File:Flag_of_Kazakhstan.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/Flag_of_Kazakhstan.svg License: Public
domain Contributors: own code, construction sheet Original artist: -x File:Flag_of_Kosovo.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1f/Flag_of_Kosovo.svg License: CC-BY-SA-3.0
Contributors: Originally from Image:Flag of Kosovo.png. Original artist: Cradel (current version), earlier version by Ningyou
File:Flag_of_Liechtenstein.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/Flag_of_Liechtenstein.svg License:
Public domain Contributors: ? Original artist: ?
File:Flag_of_Macedonia.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Flag_of_Macedonia.svg License: Public
domain Contributors: Own work Original artist: User:SKopp, rewritten by User:Gabbe
File:Flag_of_Malaysia.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Flag_of_Malaysia.svg License:
domain Contributors: Create based on the Malaysian Government Website (archive version)
Original artist: SKopp, Zscout370 and Ranking Update
Public
15.3
Content license
19
File:Flag_of_Thailand.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a9/Flag_of_Thailand.svg License: Public domain Contributors: Own work Original artist: Zscout370
File:Flag_of_Tunisia.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/Flag_of_Tunisia.svg License: Public domain
Contributors: http://www.w3.org/ Original artist: entraneur: BEN KHALIFA WISSAM
File:Flag_of_Turkey.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Flag_of_Turkey.svg License: Public domain
Contributors: Turkish Flag Law (Trk Bayra Kanunu), Law nr. 2893 of 22 September 1983. Text (in Turkish) at the website of the
Turkish Historical Society (Trk Tarih Kurumu) Original artist: David Benbennick (original author)
File:Flag_of_Ukraine.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/Flag_of_Ukraine.svg License: Public domain
Contributors: 4512:2006 . Original artist: Government of Ukraine
File:Flag_of_the_Czech_Republic.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Flag_of_the_Czech_Republic.
svg License: Public domain Contributors:
-x-'s le
-x-'s code
Zirlands codes of colors
Original artist:
(of code): SVG version by cs:-x-.
File:Flag_of_the_Netherlands.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/Flag_of_the_Netherlands.svg License: Public domain Contributors: Own work Original artist: Zscout370
File:Flag_of_the_People{}s_Republic_of_China.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/Flag_of_the_
People%27s_Republic_of_China.svg License: Public domain Contributors: Own work, http://www.protocol.gov.hk/flags/eng/n_flag/
design.html Original artist: Drawn by User:SKopp, redrawn by User:Denelson83 and User:Zscout370
File:Flag_of_the_Philippines.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/99/Flag_of_the_Philippines.svg License: Public domain Contributors: The design was taken from [1] and the colors were also taken from a Government website Original
artist: User:Achim1999
File:Flag_of_the_Republic_of_China.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Flag_of_the_Republic_of_
China.svg License: Public domain Contributors: [1] Original artist: User:SKopp
File:Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ae/Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg License: PD Contributors: ? Original artist: ?
File:Flag_of_the_United_States.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a4/Flag_of_the_United_States.svg License:
PD Contributors: ? Original artist: ?
File:Historical_Average_SAT_Scores_(Vector).svg Source:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e8/Historical_
Average_SAT_Scores_%28Vector%29.svg License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Contributors: Own work Original artist: Erik Jacobsen (
erikthered.com )
File:New_SAT_Logo_(vector).svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/New_SAT_Logo_%28vector%29.
svg License: Public domain Contributors: http://sat.collegeboard.org/SAT/public/pdf/getting-ready-for-the-sat.pdf Original artist: College Board
File:Question_book-new.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/99/Question_book-new.svg License: Cc-by-sa-3.0
Contributors:
Created from scratch in Adobe Illustrator. Based on Image:Question book.png created by User:Equazcion Original artist:
Tkgd2007
File:SAT-ACT-Preference-Map-2006.svg
Source:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/
SAT-ACT-Preference-Map-2006.svg License: CC0 Contributors: Own work. This le is a modied version of the public domain
le SAT-ACT Preference Map. Original artist: Erik Jacobsen ( erikthered.com )
File:SAT-ACT-Preference-Map.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bd/SAT-ACT-Preference-Map.svg
License: CC0 Contributors: Own work. This le is a modied version of the public domain le SAT-ACT Preference Map. Original artist:
Erik Jacobsen ( erikthered.com )
File:SAT-Grid-In-Example.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/SAT-Grid-In-Example.svg License:
CC BY-SA 4.0 Contributors: Own work Original artist: Erjwiki
File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1c/Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg License:
CC-BY-SA-3.0 Contributors: This le was derived from Wiki letter w.svg: <a href='//commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:
Wiki_letter_w.svg' class='image'><img alt='Wiki letter w.svg' src='https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Wiki_
letter_w.svg/50px-Wiki_letter_w.svg.png' width='50' height='50' srcset='https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/
Wiki_letter_w.svg/75px-Wiki_letter_w.svg.png 1.5x, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Wiki_letter_w.svg/
100px-Wiki_letter_w.svg.png 2x' data-le-width='44' data-le-height='44' /></a>
Original artist: Derivative work by Thumperward
File:Wikibooks-logo-en-noslogan.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/Wikibooks-logo-en-noslogan.
svg License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Contributors: Own work Original artist: User:Bastique, User:Ramac et al.
15.3
Content license