Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
On
CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES
Submitted by
ADITYA KUMAR
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
in
COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
Certificate
This is to certify that the seminar report entitled CRUISE CONTROL
DEVICES submitted by ADITYA KUMAR, semester VII, in partial
fulfillment of the requirement of the award of B-Tech degree in Computer
Science and Engineering, Cochin University of Science and Technology, is a
bonafide record of the seminar presented by him during the academic year
2008.
.
Mr. Vinod Kumar PP Mr. David Peter S
Seminar Guide Head of the Department
Place: Kochi
Date:
Acknowledgement
At the outset, we thank God almighty for making our endeavor a success. We also express
our gratitude to Mr. David Peter S, Head of the Department for providing us with adequate
facilities, ways and means by which we were able to complete this seminar.
We express our sincere gratitude to our seminar Guide Mr. Vinod kumar PP, Senior
Lecturer, Computer Engineering Division for his constant support and valuable suggestions
without which the successful completion of this seminar would not have been possible.
We express our immense pleasure and thankfulness to all the teachers and staff of
the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, CUSAT for their cooperation
and support.
Last but not the least, we thank all others, and especially our classmates and our family
members who in one way or another helped us in the successful completion of this work.
ADITYA KUMAR
CONTENTS
1.
2.
INTRODUCTION
PRINCIPLE OF ACC
2.1 PRINCIPLE OF ACC
1
2
2
3. SENSOR OPTIONS
3.1 LIDAR
3.2 RADAR
8
1
1
13
1
4
1
4
15
18
18
2
0
2
1
22
SL NO
List of Figures
page No
Images
1
10
11
12
13
15
Motorola ACC
16
19
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Everyday the media brings us the horrible news on road accidents. Once a report said
that the damaged property and other costs may equal 3 % of the worlds gross domestic product.
The concept of assisting driver in longitudinal vehicle control to avoid collisions has been a major
focal point of research at many automobile companies and research organizations. The idea of
driver assistance was started with the cruise control devices first appeared in 1970s in USA.
When switched on, this device takes up the task of accelerating or braking to maintain a constant
speed. But it could not consider the other vehicles on the road.
An Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system developed as the next generation assisted the driver to
keep a safe distance from the vehicle in front. Conventional cruise control was capable only to
maintain a set speed by accelerating or decelerating the vehicle. Adaptive cruise control devices
are capable of assisting the driver to keep a safe distance from the preceding vehicle by controlling
the engine throttle and brake according to the sensor data about the vehicle. This system is now
available only in some luxury cars like Mercedes S-class, Jaguar and Volvo trucks the U.S.
Department of transportation and Japans ACAHSR have started developing Intelligent Vehicles
that can communicate with each other with the help of a system called
Co-operative Adaptive Cruise Control .this paper addresses the concept of Adaptive Cruise
2.
3. SENSOR OPTIONS:
Currently four means of object detection are technically feasible and applicable in
a vehicle environment. They are
RADAR
LIDAR
FUSION SENSORS
3.1 LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)
3.1.1 Lidar is an optical remote sensing technology that measures properties of scattered light
to find range and/or other information of a distant target. The prevalent method to determine
distance to an object or surface is to use laser pulses. Like the similar radar technology, which
uses radio waves instead of light, the range to an object is determined by measuring the time
delay between transmission of a pulse and detection of the reflected signal. LIDAR
The first acc system introduced by Toyota used this method. By measuring the beat
frequency difference between a Frequency Modulated Continuous light Wave
(FMCW) and its reflection. There are several major components to a lidar system:
3.1.2Laser 600-1000 nm lasers are most common for non-scientific applications. They are
inexpensive but since they can be focused and easily absorbed by the eye the maximum power is
limited by the need to make them eye-safe. Eye-safety is often a requirement for most applications.
A common alternative 1550 nm lasers are eye-safe at much higher power levels since this
wavelength is not focussed by the eye, but the detector technology is less advanced and so these
wavelengths are generally used at longer ranges and lower accuracies. They are also used for
military applications as 1550 nm is not visible in night vision goggles unlike the shorter 1000 nm
infrared laser. Airborne topographic mapping lidars generally use 1064 nm diode pumped YAG
lasers, while bathymetric systems generally use 532 nm frequency doubled diode pumped YAG
lasers because 532 nm penetrates water with much much less attenuation than
does 1064 nm. Laser settings include the laser repetition rate (which controls the data collection
speed). Pulse length is generally an attribute of the laser cavity length, the number of passes
required through the gain material (YAG, YLF, etc.), and Q-switch speed. Better target
resolution is achieved with shorter pulses, provided the Lidar receiver detectors and
electronics have sufficient bandwidth.
3.1.3Scanner and optics How fast images can be developed is also affected by the
speed at which it can be scanned into the system. There are several options to scan the
azimuth and elevation, including dual oscillating plane mirrors, a combination with a
polygon mirror, a dual axis scanner. Optic choices affect the angular resolution and range
that can be detected. A hole mirror or a beam splitter are options to collect a return signal.
Consider the following figure with N elements placed (equally separated) with a
distanced apart. Suppose they have uniform response to signals from all directions.
Element 1 is taken as reference with zero phase.
Division of Computer Science and
Engineering, SOE, CUSAT 8
mounted inside the front grille of the car as shown in figure. So its size is to be small.
Typical radar produced by Delphi-Delco Electronic systems is having the size of two
stacked paper back books (14x7x10 cm).
3.3 FUSION SENSOR
The new sensor system introduced by Fujitsu Ten Ltd. and Honda through their PATH
program includes millimeter wave radar linked to a 640x480 pixel stereo camera with a
40 degree viewing angle. These two parts work together to track the car from the nonmoving objects. While RADAR target is the cars rear bumper, the stereo camera is
constantly captures all objects in its field of view.
The image processor measures the distances to the objects through triangulation
method. This method includes an algorithm based on the detection of the vertical
edges and distance. Incorporating both the 16-degree field of view of radar and 40degree field of view of camera enhances the performance in tight curves.
Division of Computer Science and
Engineering, SOE, CUSAT 11
r=
The stopping distance is given by, Ds = .5 u /ax + td u, where u is the initial speed td is the
time taken by the system to receive and process the sensor data and ax is the acceleration of
the vehicle .the figure shows the detection of edges of the preceding vehicles.
5. CONTROLLER
The controller translates the situation into appropriate actions through
brake and pedal and throttle control actions. Depending on the present traffic situation,
two types of controls are possible.
1. Speed control
2. Headway control
If there is no vehicle presently in front, then the speed is controlled about a set point
just as in conventional cruise control. But in order to keep a safe distance between the
vehicle s, the headway control is required.
5.1 ARTIFICIAL COGNITION
The conversion of raw information from sensors to control actions by the two steps:1. Analyzing the traffic conditions
2. Deciding on a particular situation
The controller translates the desired situation into appropriate control action through
brake and throttle actuation. The controller concept is simplified in the flow-diagram:
Engineering, SOE, CUSAT 13
5.2.1 MPC565
It is a throttle controller or an engine speed controller. It consists of the following features
The MPC 565 can be programmed to generate the control signals according to the sensor data.
The Phycore-MPC 565 developers are available to program and develop the desired controller.
The throttle valve is actuated and the air intake is controlled so the requirement of fuel
for the right proportion with the air also increases. So more fuel is injected and engine
speed is changed.
5.2.2 HC12
68HC12 has 2 8-bit accumulators A and B (referred to as a single 16-bit accumulator, D, when
A & B are cascaded so as to allow for operations involving 16 bits), 2 16-bit registers X and Y, a
16-bit program counter, a 16-bit stack pointer and an 8 bit condition code register..
The 68HC12 (6812 or HC12 for short) is a 16-bit microcontroller family from freescale
semiconductor. Originally introduced in the mid 1990s, the architecture isThe HC12 is a
breaking controller which receives data from the wheel speed sensors and from the
DSP module. It generates the braking control signal.
5.2.3 CAN (Control Area Network) BUS
CAN BUS is the network established between microcontrollers. It is a2-wire, half-duplex, high
speed network for high speed high speed applications with short messages. It can theoretically
link up to 2032 devices on a network. But today the practical limit is 110 devices. It offers high
speed communication rate up to 1Mbits per second and allows real time control. .
Each module in the ACC connected to the CAN is called a node. All are acting as
transceivers. The CAN bus carries data to and from all nodes and provides quicker
control transfer to each module.The actuator used for throttle control is a solenoid
actuator. The signal through the coil can push or pull the plunger
Engineering, SOE, CUSAT 16
3.
Because braking rates, breaking capacity and other important information about
the vehicles can be exchanged, safer and closer vehicle traffic is possible .
Engineering, SOE, CUSAT 17
Figg6 .Under CACC, both the leading and following vehicles are electronically tied to
a virtual reference vehicle, as well as to each other.
Division of Computer Science and
Engineering, SOE, CUSAT 18
7. ADVANTAGES
1. The driver is relieved from the task of careful acceleration, deceleration and braking
in congested traffics.
2. A highly responsive traffic system that adjusts itself to avoid accidents can be developed.
3. Since the breaking and acceleration are done in a systematic way, the fuel efficiency
of the vehicle is increased.
DISADVANTAGES
1. A cheap version is not yet realized.
2. A high market penetration is required if a society of intelligent vehicles is to be formed.
3. Encourages the driver to become careless. It can lead to severe accidents if the
system is malfunctioning.
4. The ACC systems yet evolved enable vehicles to cooperate with the other vehicles
and hence do not respond directly to the traffic signals.
5. A highly responsive traffic system that adjusts itself to avoid accidents can be develop
6. Since the breaking and acceleration are done in a systematic way, the fuel efficiency
of the vehicle is
Engineering, SOE, CUSAT 19
8. CONCLUSION
The accidents caused by automobiles are injuring lakhs of people every year. The safety
measures starting from air bags and seat belts have now reached to ACC, SACC and
CACC systems. The researchers of Intelligent Vehicles Initiative in USA and the Ertico
program of Europe are working on technologies that may ultimately lead to vehicles that
are wrapped in a cocoon of sensors with a 360 degree view of their surroundings. It will
probably take decades, but car accidents may eventually become as rare as plane
accidents are now, even though the road laws will have to be changed, upto an extent
since the non-human part of the vehicle controlling will become predominant.
Engineering, SOE, CUSAT 20
9.
REFERENCES
1. Willie D. Jones, Keeping cars from crashing. , IEEE Spectrum September 2001.
2. P.Venhovens, K. Naab and B. Adiprasto, Stop And Go Cruise Control, International
Journal of Automotive Technology, Vol.1, No.2, 2000.
3. Martin D. Adams, Co axial range Measurement-Current trends for Mobile robotic
Applications, IEEE Sensors journal, Vol.2, no.1 Feb.2002.
4. http:// path.Berkeley.edu
5. Merril I.Skolnik, Introduction to RADAR Systems.Tata Mc Grawhill edition 2001.
Engineering, SOE, CUSAT 21