Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
I. NOMENCLATURE
CT(s): Current Transformer(s)
EMTP: Electromagnetic Transient Program
ATP: Alternative Transient Program
WG: Work Group (such as WG produced [6])
II. INTRODUCTION
CT1
CT2
CT3
Burden
Primary
Current
Source
CT4
Resistance
Z Sec
CTs
Ratio
Nominal
Accuracy
Secondary
Resistance
600-5 A
C100
.25 Ohm
1200-5 A
C400
1 Ohm
2000-5 A
C400
.75 Ohm
4000-5 A
C600
1.25 Ohm
B. Saturation Routine:
Traditionally, the suppliers of CTs provide curves that
reflect the factory test results in excitation current (rms) versus
excitation voltage (rms) values as depicted in Fig 4. As an
EMTP supplemental tool, the Saturation Routine was
developed to convert the rms values of current and voltage in
the CT saturation curves into peak current versus flux (Volt-s).
C. Hysteresis Routine:
The Hysteresis Routine was developed to address the remnant
magnetization nature of an inductor with hysteresis
characteristics (i.e. in equipment with iron core such as
transformers and CTs). It produces a hysteresis loop that
2
1.5
Excitation Voltage-Volts
1000
Flux (V.s)
100
0.5
-3
-2
0
-0.5 0
-1
-1
10
-1.5
-2
Current (A)
1
0.01
0.1
10
0.6
PSP
0.4
Flux (V.s)
Excitation Voltage-Volts
1000
100
0.2
0
-1
-0.5
-0.2
0.5
-0.4
-0.6
Current (A)
10
0.001
0.01
0.1
PSP
0.4
0.2
0
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
-0.2
0.5
1.5
-0.4
-0.6
Current (A)
PSP
0.4
Flux (V.s)
Flux (V.s)
0.2
0
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
-0.2
10
15
20
25
-0.4
-0.6
Current (A)
TABLE 2
LAST DATA P OINT VALUES IN T ERMS OF DELTA A AND DELTA F
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.09
time in Seconds
Primary Current
Sec with 30
Sec with 40
Sec with 50
Delta F ratio
10
20
10
20
10
20
6000
Current in A
Delta A Ratio
30
30
40
40
50
50
Amperes in Primary
Current
4000
2000
0
-2000 0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
-4000
Time s
Where:
Error40-50
Error30-40
500
0
-5000.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.1
-1000
-1500
Time s
Error30-40
Error40-50
Current in A
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
-2000 0
-4000
-6000
-8000
-10000
-12000
-14000
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Time s
1.00E+04
0.00E+00
0.01
-1.00E+04
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.09
-2.00E+04
-3.00E+04
-4.00E+04
Time in Seconds
Primary Current
Standard Burden
Double Burden
30000
7.00E+04
10000
6.00E+04
0
0.01
-10000
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.09
-20000
-30000
-40000
Time in Seconds
Double Burden
Standard Burden
AmperesinPrimaryCurrent
AmperesinPrimaryCurrent
20000
5.00E+04
4.00E+04
3.00E+04
2.00E+04
1.00E+04
0.00E+00
0.01
-1.00E+04
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.09
Primary Current
-2.00E+04
Time in Seconds
Amperes in Primary
Current
2.00E+04
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.09
-4.00E+04
-5.00E+04
-6.00E+04
Time in Seconds
Double Burden
Double Burden
Fig. 12 CT 1200-5A with Two Secondary Burdens 2.38 and 4.68 Ohms
1.00E+04
0.00E+00
-1.00E+040.01
-2.00E+04
-3.00E+04
Standard Burden
Standard Burden
Primary Current
Fig. 11 CT 4000-5A with Two Secondary Burdens 2.38 and 4.68 Ohms
IX. A PPENDICES
A. EMTP Saturation Routine (Typical)
BEGIN NEW DATA CASE
C CT Saturation Curve for 1200-5 C400 CT
C Use Vbase as 1V= 0.001 kV, and Ibase as 1A,
C MVA Base as .000001 MVA
SATURATION
$ERASE
C Freq Vbase MVAb
60. 1.E-3 1.E-6
1
C Irms Amp
Vrms
0.001000
2.5
0.010000
60.0
0.024000
250.0
0.031000
350.0
0.050000
450.0
0.100000
490.0
0.900000
510.0
9999
C Final row of resulting printout:
$PUNCH, CT_Sat.pch
BLANK card ending all "SATURATION" data cases
BEGIN NEW DATA CASE
BLANK
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
X. REFERENCES
[1] Rifaat, R.M., Considerations in Applying Power Bus Protection
Schemes to Industrial and IPP Systems IEEE Transactions on
Industry Applications, Vol. 40, No. 6, Nov/Dec 2004, pp. 17051711
[2] Vanderleck, J.M. (Work Group Chair), et al., Transient Response
of Current Transformers A Report Sponsored by the Power
System Relaying Committee of the IEEE Power Engineering
Society, IEEE Publication Number 76CH1130-4PWR, 1976.
[3] GEC Protective Relays Application Guide, Published by GEC
rd
Measurements St Leonards Works, 3 Edition 1987, Section 5.3.11
and 5.3.12
[4] Anderson, P. M., Power System Protection, a Book, IEEE
Press/McGraw-Hill, 1999
[5] Frame, J., G., Mohan, N., Tsu-Huei, L., Hysteresis Modeling in an
Electro-Magnetic Transient Program: IEEE Transactions on
Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-101, No., 9, Sep 1982,
pp. 3403-3412.
[6] Neves, W.L.A.., Dommel, H., W., On Modeling Iron Core
Nonlinearities IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 8, No.,
2, May 1993, pp. 417-425.
[7] Tziouvaras, D.A. (Work Group Chair), et al., Mathematical
Models for Current, Voltage and Coupling Capacitor Voltage
[15]
[16]
[17]
XI. BIOGRAPHIES
Rasheek Rifaat (M'1976- SM'1993): received a B.Sc. from Cairo
University in 1972 and M.Eng. from McGill University in Montreal in
1979 in Electrical Engineering. Between 1975 and 1981 he worked for
Union Carbide Canada Ltd. in Beauharnois, Quebec, Canada. In 1981, he
joined Monenco Consultants Limited in Calgary, Alberta, and Saskmont
Engineering Limited in Regina, Saskatchewan, where he was involved in
thermal power generating plant projects. Since 1991, he has been
working with Jacobs Canada (previously Delta Hudson Engineering Ltd.)
in Calgary, Alberta, Canada with work duties on large and medium size
power cogeneration projects, and oil and gas projects. He published
papers on cogeneration power system protection, industrial power
system stability, and cogeneration unit economic dispatch. He is a
registered professional engineer in four Canadian Provinces: Alberta,
Saskatchewan, Ontario and Quebec.