Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
9
10
11
12
Case Number:
15
Plaintiffs,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
vs.
TACO BELL CORP., a California
corporation; TACO BELL OF
AMERICA, INC., a Delaware
corporation; TACO BELL
FOUNDATION, INC., a California
corporation; NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
TACO BELL ASSOCIATION, INC., a
California corporation; TACO BELL, a
business entity form unknown; YUM!, a
business entity form unknown; YUM!
BRANDS, INC., a business entity form
unknown; YUM! BRANDS, a business
entity form unknown; and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,
28
-1CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
Defendants.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1.
This Court has original jurisdiction over the subject matter of this
because Defendants maintain offices, have agents and are licensed to and do transact
business in this district.
23
THE PARTIES
24
25
26
27
28
3.
Defendant TACO BELL CORP. was and is, upon information and
-2CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
5.
5 information and belief, a Delaware corporation doing business, and at all times
6 hereinafter mentioned, an employer whose employees are engaged throughout this
7 county, the State of California, or the various states of the United States of America.
8
6.
7.
13 ASSOCIATION, INC. was and is, upon information and belief, a California
14 corporation, and at all times hereinafter mentioned, an employer whose employees
15 are engaged throughout this county, the State of California, or the various states of
16 the United States of America.
17
8.
Defendant TACO BELL was and is, upon information and belief, a
18 business entity form unknown, doing business, and at all times hereinafter
19 mentioned, an employer whose employees are engaged throughout this county, the
20 State of California, or the various states of the United States of America.
21
9.
Defendant YUM! was and is, upon information and belief, a business
22 entity form unknown, doing business, and at all times hereinafter mentioned, an
23 employer whose employees are engaged throughout this county, the State of
24 California, or the various states of the United States of America.
25
10.
Defendant YUM! BRANDS, INC. was and is, upon information and
26 belief, a business entity form unknown, doing business, and at all times hereinafter
27 mentioned, an employer whose employees are engaged throughout this county, the
28 State of California, or the various states of the United States of America.
-3CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
11.
Defendant YUM! BRANDS was and is, upon information and belief, a
2 business entity form unknown, doing business, and at all times hereinafter
3 mentioned, an employer whose employees are engaged throughout this county, the
4 State of California, or the various states of the United States of America.
5
12.
6 sued herein under the fictitious names DOES 1-10, but pray for leave to amend and
7 serve such fictitiously named Defendants once their names and capacities become
8 known.
9
13.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that DOES 1-10
14.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that each and all
19 of the acts and omissions alleged herein was performed by, or is attributable to,
20 TACO BELL CORP., TACO BELL OF AMERICA, INC., TACO BELL
21 FOUNDATION, INC., NORTHERN CALIFORNIA TACO BELL
22 ASSOCIATION, INC., TACO BELL, YUM!, YUM! BRANDS, INC. and/or
23 YUM! BRANDS and DOES 1-10 (collectively Defendants), each acting as the
24 agent for the other, with legal authority to act on the others behalf. The acts of any
25 and all Defendants were in accordance with, and represent the official policy of,
26 Defendants.
27
15.
28 each and every act or omission complained of herein. At all times herein
-4CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
1 mentioned, Defendants, and each of them, aided and abetted the acts and omissions
2 of each and all the other Defendants in proximately causing the damages herein
3 alleged.
4
16.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that each of said
9 each and all other persons similarly situated, and thus, seek class certification under
10 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a), (b)(2), and (b)(3).
11
18.
All claims alleged herein arise under California law for which Plaintiffs
19.
14
15
16
17
20.
a.
20 any) are so numerous that joinder of all members would be unfeasible and
21 impractical. The membership of the entire class is unknown to Plaintiffs at this
22 time, however, the class is estimated to be greater than one-hundred (100)
23 individuals and the identity of such membership is readily ascertainable by
24 inspection of Defendants employment records.
25
b.
26 adequately protect the interests of each class member with whom they have a well
27 defined community of interest, and Plaintiffs claims (or defenses, if any) are typical
28 of all class members as demonstrated herein.
-5CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
c.
2 adequately, protect the interests of each class member with whom they have a well3 defined community of interest and typicality of claims, as alleged herein. Plaintiffs
4 acknowledge that they have an obligation to make known to the Court any
5 relationship, conflicts, or differences with any class member. Plaintiffs attorneys
6 and the proposed class counsel are versed in the rules governing class action
7 discovery, certification, and settlement. Plaintiffs have incurred, and throughout the
8 duration of this action will continue to incur costs and attorneys fees that have
9 been, are, and will be necessarily expended for the prosecution of this action for the
10 substantial benefit of each class member.
11
d.
12 action adjudication superior to other methods. Class action will achieve economies
13 of time, effort and expense as compared with separate lawsuits, and will avoid
14 inconsistent outcomes because the same issues can be adjudicated in the same
15 manner and at the same time for the entire class.
16
e.
17 employment and labor laws every day. Current employees are often afraid to assert
18 their rights out of fear of direct or indirect retaliation. Former employees are fearful
19 of bringing actions because they believe their former employers may damage their
20 future endeavors through negative references and/or other means. Class actions
21 provide the class members who are not named in the complaint with a type of
22 anonymity that allows for the vindication of their rights at the same time as their
23 privacy is protected.
24
21.
There are common questions of law and fact as to the class (and each
25 subclass, if any) that predominate over questions affecting only individual members,
26 including but not limited to:
27
a.
28 members to work over eight (8) hours per day, over twelve (12) hours per day, or
-6CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
1 over forty (40) hours per week and failed to pay legally required overtime
2 compensation to Plaintiffs and the other class members;
3
b.
c.
6 members of meal periods or required Plaintiffs and the class members to work
7 during meal periods without compensation;
8
d.
9 members of rest periods or required Plaintiffs and the class members to work during
10 rest periods without compensation;
11
e.
f.
14 Plaintiffs and the other class members upon their discharge or resignation;
15
g.
h.
18 class members for necessary and required business expenditures and losses incurred
19 by them in the scope of their employment;
20
i.
22
j.
23
k.
21 expenses;
l.
1
2
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
22.
At all times set forth, Defendants employed Plaintiffs and other persons
23.
24.
25.
11 within California.
12
26.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that at all times
27.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege that Defendants
18 knew or should have known that Plaintiffs and other members of the class were
19 entitled to receive certain wages for overtime compensation and that they were not
20 receiving certain wages for overtime compensation.
21
28.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege that Defendants
22 knew or should have known that Plaintiffs and other class members were entitled to
23 receive complete and accurate wage statements in accordance with California law.
24
29.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege that Defendants
25 knew or should have known that Plaintiffs and other class members were entitled to
26 receive all the wages owed to them upon discharge.
27
30.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege that Defendants
28 knew or should have known that Plaintiffs and other class members were entitled to
-8CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
1 receive all meal breaks or payment of one hour of pay at Plaintiffs and class
2 members regular rate of pay when a meal break was missed.
3
31.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege that Defendants
4 knew or should have known that Plaintiffs and other class members were entitled to
5 receive all rest breaks or payment of one hour of pay at Plaintiffs and class
6 members regular rate of pay when a rest break was missed.
7
32.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege that Defendants
8 knew or should have known that Plaintiffs and the other class members were
9 entitled to receive full reimbursement for all business-related expenses and costs
10 they incurred during the course and scope of their employment, and that they did not
11 receive full reimbursement of applicable business-related expenses and costs they
12 incurred.
13
33.
Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege that at all times
14 herein mentioned, Defendants knew or should have known that they had a duty to
15 compensate Plaintiffs and other class members, and that Defendants had the
16 financial ability to pay such compensation, but willfully, knowingly, and
17 intentionally failed to do so, and falsely represented to Plaintiffs and other class
18 members that they were properly denied wages, all in order to increase Defendants
19 profits.
20
34.
21 Labor Code shall limit the right of any wage claimant to sue directly...for any
22 wages or penalty due him [or her] under this article.
23
24
25
26
27
35.
36.
37.
7 Order provides that Defendants are and were required to pay Plaintiffs and the other
8 class members employed by Defendants, and working more than eight (8) hours in a
9 day or more than forty (40) hours in a workweek, at the rate of time-and-one-half for
10 all hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours in a day or more than forty (40) hours
11 in a workweek.
12
38.
13 provides that Defendants are and were required to pay Plaintiffs and the other class
14 members employed by Defendants, and working more than twelve (12) hours in a
15 day, overtime compensation at a rate of two times their regular rate of pay.
16
39.
17 compensation at one-and-one-half times the regular hourly rate for hours worked in
18 excess of eight (8) hours in a day or forty (40) hours in a week or for the first eight
19 (8) hours worked on the seventh day of work, and to overtime compensation at
20 twice the regular hourly rate for hours worked in excess of twelve (12) hours in a
21 day or in excess of eight (8) hours in a day on the seventh day of work.
22
40.
During the relevant time period, Plaintiffs and the other class members
23 consistently worked in excess of eight (8) hours in a day, in excess of twelve (12)
24 hours in a day, or in excess of forty (40) hours in a week.
25
41.
During the relevant time period, Defendants willfully failed to pay all
42.
During the relevant time period, Plaintiffs and the other class members
28 regularly received incentives in the form of bonuses which were not incorporated in
-10CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
43.
Defendants failure to pay Plaintiffs and the other class members the
44.
10
11
12
45.
46.
At all times herein set forth, California Labor Code 201 and 202
15 provide that if an employer discharges an employee, the wages earned and unpaid at
16 the time of discharge are due and payable immediately, and that if an employee
17 voluntarily leaves his or her employment, his or her wages shall become due and
18 payable not later than seventy-two (72) hours thereafter, unless the employee has
19 given seventy-two (72) hours previous notice of his or her intention to quit, in which
20 case the employee is entitled to his or her wages at the time of quitting.
21
47.
22 Plaintiffs and the other class members who are no longer employed by Defendants
23 their wages, earned and unpaid, either at the time of discharge, or within seventy24 two (72) hours of their leaving Defendants employ.
25
48.
Defendants failure to pay Plaintiffs and those class members who are
26 no longer employed by Defendants their wages earned and unpaid at the time of
27 discharge, or within seventy-two (72) hours of their leaving Defendants employ, is
28 in violation of California Labor Code 201 and 202.
-11CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
49.
2 fails to pay wages owed, in accordance with 201 and 202, then the wages of the
3 employee shall continue as a penalty from the due date, and at the same rate until
4 paid or until an action is commenced; but the wages shall not continue for more than
5 thirty (30) days.
6
50.
Plaintiffs and the other class members are entitled to recover from
7 Defendants the statutory penalty for each day they were not paid, at their regular
8 hourly rate of pay, up to a thirty (30) day maximum pursuant to California Labor
9 Code 203.
10
11
12
13
14
51.
52.
17 Commission Order and California Labor Code 226.7(a) and 512(a) were
18 applicable to Plaintiffs and the other class members employment by Defendants.
19
53.
At all times herein set forth, California Labor Code 226.7(a) provides
20 that no employer shall require an employee to work during any meal period
21 mandated by an applicable order of the California Industrial Welfare Commission.
22
54.
At all times herein set forth, California Labor Code 512(a) provides
23 that an employer may not require, cause or permit an employee to work for a period
24 of more than five (5) hours per day without providing the employee with a meal
25 period of not less than thirty (30) minutes, except that if the total work period per
26 day of the employee is not more than six (6) hours, the meal period may be waived
27 by mutual consent of both the employer and the employee.
28
55.
At all times herein set forth, California Labor Code 512(a) further
-12CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
1 provides that an employer may not require, cause or permit an employee to work for
2 a period of more than ten (10) hours per day without providing the employee with a
3 second meal period of not less than thirty (30) minutes, except that if the total hours
4 worked is no more than twelve (12) hours, the second meal period may be waived
5 by mutual consent of the employer and the employee only if the first meal period
6 was not waived.
7
56.
During the relevant time period, Plaintiffs and the other members of the
8 class who were scheduled to work for a period of time no longer than six (6) hours,
9 and who did not waive their legally-mandated meal periods by mutual consent, were
10 required to work for periods longer than five (5) hours without a meal period of not
11 less than thirty (30) minutes.
12
57.
During the relevant time period, Plaintiffs and the other class members
13 who were scheduled to work for a period of time in excess of six (6) hours were
14 required to work for periods longer than five (5) hours without a meal period of not
15 less than thirty (30) minutes.
16
58.
During the relevant time period, Plaintiffs and other members of the
17 class who were scheduled to work in excess of ten (10) hours but not longer than
18 twelve (12) hours, and who did not waive their legally-mandated meal periods by
19 mutual consent were required to work in excess of ten (10) hours without receiving
20 a second meal period of not less than thirty (30) minutes.
21
59.
During the relevant time period, Plaintiffs and the other class members
22 who were scheduled to work for a period of time in excess of twelve (12) hours
23 were required to work for periods longer than ten (10) hours without a meal period
24 of not less than thirty (30) minutes.
25
60.
26 Plaintiffs and other members of the class to work during meal periods and failed to
27 compensate Plaintiffs and members of the class for work performed during meal
28 periods.
-13CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
61.
2 Commission Wage Orders, and California Labor Code 226.7(a) and 512(a).
3
62.
4 members of the class are entitled to recover from Defendants one additional hour of
5 pay at the employees regular hourly rate of compensation for each work day that
6 the meal period was not provided.
7
8
10
11
63.
64.
65.
At all times herein set forth, California Labor Code 226.7(a) provides
17 that no employer shall require an employee to work during any rest period mandated
18 by an applicable order of the California Industrial Welfare Commission.
19
66.
20 other members of the class to work in excess of four (4) hours without providing a
21 ten (10) minute rest period.
22
67.
23 other members of the class to work an additional four (4) hours without providing a
24 second ten (10) minute rest period.
25
68.
26 Plaintiffs and other members of the class to work during rest periods and failed to
27 compensate Plaintiffs and members of the class for work performed during rest
28 periods.
-14CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
69.
70.
4 members of the class are entitled to recover from Defendants one additional hour of
5 pay at the employees regular hourly rate of compensation for each work day that
6 the rest period was not provided.
7
8
10
11
71.
72.
14 with complete and accurate wage statements that include, among other things,
15 Plaintiffs and other class members proper social security number and total hours
16 worked.
17
73.
18 Plaintiffs and the other class members have suffered injury and damage to their
19 statutorily-protected rights.
20
74.
Specifically, Plaintiffs and the other class members have been injured
75.
Plaintiffs and the other class members are entitled to recover from
76.
Plaintiffs and the other class members are also entitled to an award of
-15CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
1 costs and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to California Labor Code 226(e).
2
77.
Plaintiffs and the other class members are also entitled to injunctive
3 relief to ensure compliance with this section, pursuant to California Labor Code
4 226(g).
5
6
78.
79.
At all times herein set forth California Labor Code 2800 and 2802
12 provide that an employer must reimburse employees for all necessary expenditures.
13
80.
14 expenses and costs that were not fully reimbursed by Defendants, including and
15 without limitation, required shoes, required clothing and related fees and deposits
16 that resulted from their employment with Defendants. Specifically, Defendants had,
17 and continue to have, a policy and practice of requiring employees, including
18 Plaintiffs and class members, to pay for purchase and maintenance of shoes and
19 other required clothing out of their own funds. Defendants had, and continue to
20 have, a policy of not reimbursing employees, including Plaintiffs and class
21 members, for said business-related expenses and costs.
22
81.
23 Plaintiffs and other class members for necessary business-related expenses and
24 costs.
25
82.
26 Defendants their business-related expenses incurred during the course and scope of
27 their employment, plus interest and an award of costs and reasonable attorneys fees
28 pursuant to California Labor Code 2800 and 2802.
-16CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
83.
84.
7 unfair, unlawful, and harmful to Plaintiffs, the other class members, and to the
8 general public. Plaintiffs seek to enforce important rights affecting the public
9 interest within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure 1021.5.
10
85.
86.
14 seq. may be predicated on the violation of any state or federal law. In the instant
15 case, Defendants policy and practice of requiring their non-exempt or hourly paid
16 employees, including Plaintiffs and class members, to work in excess of forty (40)
17 hours per week without paying them proper overtime compensation violates the Fair
18 Labor Standards Act, codified at 29 U.S.C. 207. Additionally, Defendants policy
19 and practice of requiring non-exempt or hourly paid employees, including Plaintiffs
20 and class members, to work overtime without paying them proper compensation
21 violates California Labor Code 510 and 1198. Defendants policy and practice of
22 requiring non-exempt or hourly employees, including Plaintiffs and class members,
23 to work through their meal and rest breaks without paying them proper
24 compensation violates California Labor Code 226.7(a) and 512(a). Moreover,
25 Defendants policy and practice of not reimbursing non-exempt or hourly
26 employees, including Plaintiffs and class members, for business related expenses
27 and costs violates California Labor Code 2800 and 2802.
28
87.
88.
4 Plaintiffs and the putative class members are entitled to restitution of the wages
5 withheld and retained by Defendants during a period that commences four years
6 prior to the filing of this complaint; a permanent injunction requiring Defendants to
7 pay all outstanding wages due to Plaintiffs and class members; an award of
8 attorneys fees pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 1021.5 and other
9 applicable laws; and an award of costs.
10
11
12
13
Class Certification
16
1.
17
2.
18
3.
19
20
1.
For general unpaid wages at overtime wage rates and such general and
21
2.
22
3.
23
24
4.
25
26
5.
27
appropriate.
For reasonable attorneys fees and for costs of suit incurred herein
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem equitable and
28 \\
-18CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
1.
according to proof;
2.
Plaintiffs and all other class members who have left Defendants employ;
3.
For reasonable attorneys fees and for costs of suit incurred herein; and
4.
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem equitable and
appropriate.
10
1.
11
according to proof;
12
2.
13
3.
For reasonable attorneys fees and costs of suit incurred herein; and
14
4.
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.
15
16
1.
17
according to proof;
18
2.
19
3.
For reasonable attorneys fees and costs of suit incurred herein; and
20
4.
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.
21
22
1.
23
according to proof;
24
2.
25
3.
26
27
4.
28
For reasonable attorneys fees and costs of suit incurred herein pursuant
-19CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
5.
appropriate.
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem equitable and
1.
appropriate;
2.
3.
according to proof;
For unpaid wages and such general and special damages as may be
For pre-judgment interest on any unpaid wages from the date such
10
4.
11
2802;
12
5.
For reasonable attorneys fees and costs of suit incurred herein; and
13
6.
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem equitable and
14
appropriate.
15
16
1.
17
prejudgment interest from the day such amounts were due and payable;
18
2.
19
and all funds disgorged from Defendants and determined to have been
20
21
22
3.
23
Plaintiffs and other class members are entitled to recover under California
24
25
4.
26
For restitution of unpaid wages to Plaintiffs and all class members and
For reasonable attorneys fees and costs of suit incurred herein that
27 \\
28 \\
-20CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
5.
appropriate.
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem equitable and
3
4 Dated: September 7, 2007
Respectfully submitted,
Initiative Legal Group LLP
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
By:
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-21CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT