ty. In GR No.

76607, The private respondents are suing several officers of the US

Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them for
contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon.
The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they claime
d that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bi
d, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed
aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers of the
US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them
for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain Diz
on. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they cla
imed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to
bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove fi
led aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers of
the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by th
em for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain
Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they
claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation
to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove
filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers
of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by
them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certa
in Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because th
ey claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitat
ion to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Gen
ove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several office
rs of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted
by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a ce
rtain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because
they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvi
tation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian
Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several off
icers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conduc
ted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a
certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner beca
use they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in thei
nvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabi
an Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several
officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding con
ducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won b
y a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner b
ecause they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in t
heinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, F
abian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing sever
al officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding
conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was wo
n by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winne
r because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included i
n theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470
, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing se
veral officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the biddi
ng conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was
won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid wi
nner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not include
d in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79
470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing
several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bi
dding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which
was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid
winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not incl
uded in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No.

79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are su
ing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the
bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base whi
ch was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to the
bid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not i
ncluded in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR
No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are
suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with
the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base
which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to
thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area no
t included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In
GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents
are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection wi
th the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said ba
se which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award
to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area
not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.
In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private responden
ts are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection
with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said
base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the awa
rd to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an a
rea not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebiddi
ng.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respon
dents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connect
ion with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe s
aid base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the
award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid a
n area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebi
dding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private res
pondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in conn
ection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inth
e said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel t
he award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bi
d an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a r
ebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private
respondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in c
onnection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services i
nthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cance
l the award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his
bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct
a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The priva
te respondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base i
n connection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber service
s inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to ca
ncel the award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in
his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to condu
ct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The pr
ivate respondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Bas
e in connection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber serv
ices inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to
cancel the award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included
in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to co
nduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The
private respondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air
Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber s
ervices inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted
to cancel the award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had includ
ed in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to

conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607,
The private respondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark A
ir Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barbe
r services inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wan
ted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had inc
luded in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently,
to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 7660
7, The private respondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClar
k Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for ba
rber services inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents
wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had
included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequent
ly, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 7
6607, The private respondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inC
lark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for
barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The responden
ts wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon h
ad included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequ
ently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No
. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force
inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts
for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respon
dents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizo
n had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subs
equently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR
No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers of the US Air For
ce inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them for contrac
ts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The res
pondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they claimed that D
izon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and s
ubsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In
GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers of the US Air
Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them for cont
racts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The
respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they claimed tha
t Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, an
d subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty.
In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers of the US A
ir Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them for c
ontracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. T
he respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they claimed
that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid,
and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed a
ty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers of the U
S Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them fo
r contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon
. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they claim
ed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation to b
id, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove file
d aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers of th
e US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by them
for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain Di
zon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they cl
aimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitation t
o bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove f
iled aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers of
the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted by t
hem for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a certain
Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because they
claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvitatio

n to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genov

e filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several officers
of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducted b
y them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a cert
ain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner because t
hey claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinvita
tion to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Ge
nove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several offic
ers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding conducte
d by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by a c
ertain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner becaus
e they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in theinv
itation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian
Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several of
ficers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding condu
cted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won by
a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner bec
ause they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in the
invitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fab
ian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing several
officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding co
nducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was won
by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winner
because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included in
theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 79470,
Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing seve
ral officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidding
conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which was w
on by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid winn
er because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not included
in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 7947
0, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suing s
everal officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the bidd
ing conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which wa
s won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebid w
inner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not includ
ed in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No. 7
9470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are suin
g several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with the b
idding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base which
was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to thebi
d winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not inc
luded in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR No
. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents are s
uing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with th
e bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base wh
ich was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to th
ebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area not
included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In GR
No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents ar
e suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection with
the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said base
which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award to
thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an area n
ot included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding.In
GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respondents
are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connection w
ith the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe said b
ase which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the award
to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an are

a not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidding

.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private responde
nts are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connectio
n with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe sai
d base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the aw
ard to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid an
area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a rebidd
ing.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private respo
ndents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in connec
tion with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services inthe
said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel the
award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his bid
an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a reb
idding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private re
spondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in con
nection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services int
he said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to cancel
the award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in his b
id an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct a
rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed aty. In GR No. 76607, The private
respondents are suing several officers of the US Air Force inClark Air Base in
connection with the bidding conducted by them for contracts for barber services
inthe said base which was won by a certain Dizon. The respondents wanted to canc
el the award to thebid winner because they claimed that Dizon had included in hi
s bid an area not included in theinvitation to bid, and subsequently, to conduct
a rebidding.In GR No. 79470, Fabian Genove filed a