Project 2

Project #2 1
Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey
Project #2
Amanda Powe
SOWK 300
Tuskegee University
March 13, 2010
Project #2 2
Introduction
Description of the problem
When officers pull over individuals as suspects in a crime because of their
race and stereotypical features. This problem is not new but the issue is not
been spoken about as much as other subjects in the government dealing with
policy. There are a number of African American that are unaware of the ways
and the issue of Racial Profiling. Though there are a number of efforts to stop
racial profiling, there needs to be some efforts developed by governments at
state and local levels participation. Participation should not come in just one
form developed by the government in the form of policy, use of technology,
and community involvement. The efforts should be solid and well thought out
by the officials who will be manning the cases. There should be solution that
will not humiliate citizens while allowing traffic officers to do their jobs.
Attributes to be measured
The attributes that will be measured will be based on each question on the
survey in which I created. Those attributes include age, gender, and race.
On a larger scale there are a number of questions that will vary from
knowledge about racial profiling to what should be done to eliminate it. The
ways in which we look at the subject determine the amount of input that will
be received by conducting this research. The research will look at the
backgrounds of the respondents but will only ask 3 questions that will allow
Project #2 3
for a analysis of the person.
Bivariate Hypotheses
I feel that race and age will have a dramatic affect on the way in which the
respondents respond. In the case of communities and if racial profiling a
problem there will be a need to bring in a control variable that would bring in
another dimension. Age will most definitely have an affect on how the
respondents information lines up in the bivariate cases. I also feel that there
will also be a great presence of women throughout the bivariate cases.
Multivariate Hypotheses
Multivariate analysis require a number of tactics. I used the notion that the
outcomes would be about the same as the bivariate analysis. I think that the
variable gender will be able to change the entire affect of the questions that
will be asked. Also, the multivariate outcome will look deeply at the questions
while showing that women care more about the subject of racial profiling
methods. Females will be more inclined to support written policy for the sake
of their men. The analysis will look at this information and will find out if
these factors have as huge a role as determined here in the hypotheses.
Rationale
The fact that there was not much involvement from other races makes
observing their contributions very interesting. When looking at the other
races information the only other race that answer outside of the field will be
Project #2 4
Hispanic and those who answered other. The way in which the data will be
analyzed will take a look at the way in which the dominate group answered.
The dominant group will be African American and their numbers will be at the
top of the graph for never as well with rarely being the second highest.
Project #2 5
Results
Table 1
Age of Respondents
______________________________________
Gender Frequency Percent

__________________ ____________________
under 21 35 35%
21-24 47 47%
25-40 16 16%
41-54 0 0%
55and over 2 2%
______________________________________
Project #2 6
Table 2
Response by Gender
______________________________________
Gender Frequency Percent

__________________ ____________________
Male 47 47%
Female 52 52%
______________________________________
Table 3
Race of Respondents
______________________________________
Race Frequency Percent

__________________ ____________________
African American 92 92%
White 2 2%
Hispanic 2 2%
Asian 0 0%
Native American 0 0%
Other 3 3%
______________________________________
Project #2 7
Table 4
Knowledge of Racial Profiling

______________________________________
Rating Frequency Percent

__________________ ____________________
Expert 25 25%
Somewhat Ex 25 25%
Neutral 27 27%
Somewhat Kn 13 13%
No Knowledge 9 9%
______________________________________
Table 5
Racial Profiling in Community

______________________________________
Response Frequency Percent
__________________ ____________________
Yes 61 61%
No 39 39%
______________________________________
Project #2 8
Table 6
Racial Profiling Directly Experienced

______________________________________

__________________ ____________________
Often 6 6%
Periodically 11 11%
Seldom 16 16%
Rarely 30 30%
Never 37 37%
______________________________________
Project #2 9
Table 7
Racial Profiling indirectly Experienced

______________________________________

__________________ ____________________
Often 11 11%
Periodically 16 16%
Seldom 15 15%
Rarely 25 25%
Never 33 33%
______________________________________
Project #2 10
Table 8
Address By Government?
______________________________________

__________________ ____________________
Yes 72 72%
No 28 28%
______________________________________
Table 9
Can government Eliminate R P?

______________________________________

__________________ ____________________
Yes 52 52%
No 48 48%
______________________________________
Project #2 11
Table 10
How can Government eliminate R P?

______________________________________

__________________ ____________________
Written Policy 20 20%
Officer Training 21 21%
Technology 30 30%
Citizen Inv. 29 29%
______________________________________
Project #2 12
List of Graphs
Univariate Graph 1 Age of Respondent
Univariate Graph 2 Gender of Respondent
Univariate Graph 3 Race of Respondent
Univariate Graph 4 Respondents knowledge of Racial Profiling
Univariate Graph 5 Is racial profiling a problem in the
community respondent resides or grew
up in?
Univariate Graph 6 In the last 3 years how many times have
respondent directly experienced Racial
Profiling?
Univariate Graph 7 In the last 3 years how many times have
respondent indirectly experienced Racial
Profiling?
Univariate Graph 8 Do you think Racial Profiling is an issue that
should be addressed by the Government?
Univariate Graph 9 Do you think that the Government has the
ability to eliminate Racial Profiling?
Univariate Graph 10 If government worked to eliminate Racial
Profiling, which method do you feel would
be the most effective?
Bivariate Graph 1 In the last 3 years how many times have you
Project #2 13
directly experienced Racial Profiling by
race
Multivariate Graph 1 In the last 3 years how many time have you
directly experienced Racial Profiling by race
by age
Bivariate Graph 2 Do you think Racial Profiling is an issue that
should be addressed by government by
Age
Multivariate Graph 2 Do you think Racial Profiling is and issue that
should be addressed by government by
Age by Gender
Bivariate Graph 3 Is racial profiling a problem in the
community you reside or grew up in by race
Multivariate Graph 3 Is racial profiling a problem in the
community you reside or grew up in by race
by gender
Project #2 14
Graphs and Discussion
Univariate Graph 1
Age of Respondents
2.00%
16.00%
35.00%
under 21
21-24
25-40
41-54
55 and over
47.00%
Project #2 15
Univariate Graph 2
Gender of Respondents
Male
Female
47.47%
52.53%
Project #2 16
Univariate Graph 3
Respondents by Race
African American
White
Hispanic
Asian
Native American
Other
Project #2 17
Univariate Graph 1-3 Discussion
The study on racial profiling focused on college students and I find that in
some instances college students are not the most truthful individuals. From
my understanding there may be some truth to the ages mentioned in the
graph because of my tactics. I used facebook as an online source to
accumulate more responses from individuals. I am confident that the largest
group of respondents were individuals 21 through 24. The results are very
satisfying and the amount of error must typically be small. I like that the
smallest number of respondents were 55 and over, while others did not
respond at all and were not included in the graph such as 41-54.
The Female population was represented just a bit more than the male end.
The data acknowledges that there is a higher presence of female participation
when dealing with certain issues. The other assumption that can be made is
that the amount of people surveyed were females due to the area or other
demographic factors that may be found later in the the analysis. There are a
number of other factors that may lead to assumptions that may lead to future
research.
Viewing the respondents and their race makes it interesting to see what
exactly could the results of this survey look like had there been a larger
variation in race. The fact that the survey and its respondents were
conducted on a Historically Black College or University. There may have been
different outcome with the data had there been a difference in dominant
Project #2 18
groups. I appreciate that there are a number of different races listed but I am
even more pleased that I have the data available to me to analyze the
thoughts of the African American community.

Project #2 19
Univariate Graph 4
Q1: Rate your knowledge of the subject

Racial Profiling
25.25% Expert
25.25%
Somewhat Expert
Neutral
9.09% Somewhat
Knowledgeable
No knowledge
27.27% 13.13%
The data compiled in this section proves that most individuals who were
surveyed have a overall scattered knowledge of what Racial Profiling is. I
chose to add this as the first question for the the purpose of analyzing the
other categories of data that some respondents may have been forced to
answer. It is really interesting that the majority of respondents were neutral
on their knowledge of the subject. The next category after neutral was
somewhat expert with expert following close behind. The data shows that
although there were a number of individuals that were knowledgeable of how
this issue is important to society. Given knowledge on the subject did not
have a dramatic affect on the data.

Project #2 20
Univariate Graph 5
Q2: Is Racial Profiling a problem in the

community you reside or grew up in?
Yes
39.00% No
61.00%
When asked if racial profiling was an issue in the communities, the data
proved that overall it was. The question that developed when analyzing this
graph was rather or not these areas were urban areas. The use of this data
can point out that the individuals in these communities may need extra
assistance with this issue. If I were to look closer at the subject and research
further it would be helpful to know what communities these were and if this
information can be used to implement new policy. This section of the data
also allows me to make assumptions about the demographics of the
respondents because they are in fact a part of a smaller community, Tuskegee
University students have some similar backgrounds.

Project #2 21
Univariate Graph 6
Q3: In the Last 3 years how many times have you

directly experienced Racial Profiling?
Often
16.00% Perriodically
11.00% Seldom
30.00% 6.00%
Rarely
Never
37.00%
When individuals were asked if they were in a situation that they directly
experienced racial profiling in the last 3 years the most common responses
were never and rarely. When I created this survey I believed that individuals
would have chosen periodically and seldom more than 16 and 11 percent.
The reason behind this may have a lot to do with the age group and
backgrounds of the those surveyed. Though this information is surprising the
results show that there are a number of people who know that this is a
problem but it does not directly affect them. Not to say that one day this
information could change for them given their future situations and
endeavors.
Project #2 22
Univariate Graph 7
Q4: In the last 3 years how many times have you

indirectly experienced Racial Profiling?
11.00%
33.00% Often
16.00% Periodically
Seldom
Rarely
Never
15.00%
25.00%
The data that was included in Graph 6 correlates with the information with
the information contained in this graph. The direct affect and indirect affects
are about the same and show that there needs to be more education on the
subject of racial profiling. The fact that there are a number of individuals who
don't side with and exact and secure variable, makes me question the data
and the respondents. The choice in 3 year gap was chosen because of the
age group of the students and members of the community that were surveyed.
Although there are a number of time gaps I could have chosen I wanted the
time to be recent enough for the respondent to remember and recall
experiences that may have been overlooked.

Project #2 23
Univariate Graph 8
Q5: Do you thin Racial Profiling is an Issue that should

be addressed by the Government?
28.00%
Yes
No
72.00%
With 72percent of individuals agreeing that the Government should address
this issues makes this entire survey relevant. The respondent recognize that
this issue needs a bit of force behind it in the form of government. When
government is chose to come into view of respondents of the survey, the
standards of living can be surveyed and recognized as average for all citizens.
The amount of people that responded yes exhibits to me that there must be
some type of research done to identify what should be done by the
government and what actions should be taken. The government should
assume some responsibility to the actions of their citizens and should be
identified as a immediate need. The respondents may have found that the
government would serve as a superb mediator.

Project #2 24
Univariate Graph 9
Q6: Do you think Government has the ability

eliminate Racial Profiling?
Yes
No
45.28%
54.72%
When I asked myself this question in developing this survey and its content, I
found it hard to get my mind around what exactly a respondent might assume.
I found that my thoughts varied from attitudes and the need to change them.
The way in which the respondents decided to agree that the government can
work in different ways to eliminate racial profiling. Those who answered no
are expected to think that the attitudes dealing with race may not be changed
because they were developed at an young age or during a specific experience.
The fact that those who answered were a bit torn between on the two answers
leads me to believe that this question deserves research and background.

Project #2 25
Univariate Graph 10
Q7: If the Government worked to eliminate

Racial Profiliing, which method do you feel
would be most effective?
20.00%
29.00%
Written Policy
Officer Training
Technology
Citizen Involvemet
21.00%
30.00%
In the present world, technology is sweeping our nation in different ways. The
way that respondents chose a government solution dealing with technology.
When respondents chose this option it included video cameras and voice
recorders. The distribution of respondents on different issues were not evenly
so, but they were close in range. Government involvement in certain issues is
sometimes looked at as an invasion. With the basic civil rights in place and
some that are a bit more in depth, there should not have to be a large number
of cases reported in order for this subject or receive a second look by the
government and its officials.

Project #2 26
Bivariate Graph 1
Q3: Directly experienced Racial Profiling

by Race (African American)
40
35
30
Y axis title
25 African American
20
15
10
0
Often Periodically Seldom Rarely Never
Frequncy by Race
The way that the data in this graph turned out confirmed that African
American on Tuskegee University's campus showed that the have never been
directly affected by racial profiling. All other races showed low numbers
when dealing with the direct contact with this type of discrimination. I
predicted that there would be more reports of individual cases on an often
basis reported by respondents. Thought the numbers are low it shows that
there are some cases across the board and can be compiled to develop a new
category. The way that the question was asked may have showed that some
people were unable to identify exactly what the word direct meant in relation
to racial profiling. The tactic used in creating this survey could have been
decided as another area for observation in the future.

Project #2 27
Multivariate Graph 1
Q3:Directly experienced Racial Profiling
by race by Age 21-24
18
16
Reponses by Percent
14
12 African American
10 White
Hispanic
8 Other
6
0
Often Periodica Seldom Rarely Never
lly
Frequency
The fact that there was not much involvement from other races makes
observing their contributions very interesting. When looking at the other
races information the only other race that answered outside of the field never
was Hispanic and those who answered other. The way in which the data is
analyzed take a look at the way in which the dominate group answered. The
dominant group is African American and their numbers are at the top of the
graph for never as well with rarely being the second highest.
Project #2 28
Bivariate Graph 2
Q5: Do you think racial profiling should be

addressed by government by Age (21-24)
25
22.5
Number of Respondents
20
17.5
by percent
15 Ages 21-24
12.5
10
7.5
5
2.5
0
Yes No
Responses
I found that there was a slight lead in the amount of responses that were yes.
The amount of people that chose yes were of the age of 21-24. The age group
21-24 had the largest outcome in the entire survey. It is beneficial to look into
the ways in which one group answered. The individuals who chose no were
about 3 percentages lower than the respondents who favored yes. The
respondents who wanted to government involvement were of the age 21-24 as
well. It would be interesting to look into the respondents background a bit
more. More information background may allow one to make assumptions
about the reasoning behind these results.

Project #2 29
Q5:Do you think racial profiling is an issue

that should be addressed by government
by age by gender
15
14
Number of Respondents
13
12
11
by percent
10 Under 21
9 21-24
8 25-40
7 55 and over
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Yes No
Response
The majority of respondents say of all ages except 55 and over agree that
Racial Profiling is a problem in their communities. Although the numbers
vary with those who are in the age group under 21 through 40. The number
agree with the notion that there are a number of issues that should be
evaluated and found based on the response only. This graph looks at the
responses of women only. The women were also separated by age. The way
that the respondents surveyed did not neglect any group and in the case of
this survey did not show error.

Project #2 30
Bivariate Graph 3
Q2: Is Racial Profiling a Problem in Your

Community by Race(African American)
Number of Reponses by Percent
60
55
50
45
African American
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Yes No
Response
Individuals that are African American feel that race is a problem in their
communities no matter where that is for them. African Americans sometimes
have issues that need to be focused on more by the government and the race
as whole. Though there are some pitfalls that plague the African American
Race, the issues have to be taken care of in a round about way. Routine traffic
stops are beginning to plague our societies on a daily basis. Though this data
does prove that there are issues dealing with racial profiling in different
communities. The data does not look closely at the fact that there are ways
that different that people identify within their own communities.

Project #2 31
Q2:Is Racial Profiling a problem in

Your Community by race by
35 Gender (Female)
32.5
30
Reponses by Percent
27.5
25
African American
22.5
White
20
Hispanic
17.5
15 Other
12.5
10
7.5
5
2.5
0
Yes No
Responses
This graph looks at the responses to the question if racial profiling is a
problem in their communities based on race, and the female respondents.
The amount of people that were African Americans responded yes to the
question. Now there are some other races that did respond but there are also
a lesser numbers that are in both categories of yes and no. Hispanics find
that there are problems in their communities with whites and those who
answered other were under the no category. I do think that this is no mistake
that African Americans reported higher numbers than other groups.

Project #2 32
Additonal Analysis
While reviewing the data contained in the surveys, tables, and graphs, I found
that there was a need to look into the types of areas that the respondents
reside. I questioned if the data could have been more solid when dealing with
the way that the questions were asked as well. As far as further research, I
would like to look into the different ways that individuals in urban low income
areas would suggest mending the problems of racial profiling. The difference
in male and female responses were not very dramatic, but I would also like to
look into and analyze the difference in female vs. male profiling cases.
Summary and Conclusion

Overall this report opened my eyes to the different views of the world that
change by race, gender, and age. In the past while working with different
subjects, I did not understand how important it was to look into the bivariate
and multivariate comparisons. The comparisons dealing with age allowed me
to see that thee were different concerns that were developed throughout the
racial profiling subject. There were large number of women that were also
concerned with the issue, which makes me wonder if male and female that are
African American are being treated the same when it comes to race. As a
person whom has been indirectly racially profiled on several different
occasions, there is most definitely a problem when it comes to suburban areas
and race. This is not to say that African Americans and any other races can't
Project #2 33
perform this act on their own race. This report just shows that knowledge on
the subject should be available to those who are affected directly and
indirectly.
Project #2 34
APPENDIX
Project #2 35
Draft of Questionnaire
Racial Profiling Survey

This questionnaire is meant to assess the attitudes of Tuskegee University students about Racial
Profiling. It fulfills a course requirement for SOWK 300 Please do not write your name on this
questionnaire. Your responses are anonymous and confidential; they will be reported only in
aggregate form.
RACIAL PROFILING is the use of race (and often nationality or religion) to identify a person as a
suspect or potential suspect for a crime or illegal act.
* Required
Your Age *
under 21
21-24
25-40
41-54
55 and over
Your Gender *
Male
Female
Your Race *
African American
White
Hispanic
Asian
Native American
Other
Rate your knowledge of the subject RACIAL PROFILING with 1 being an EXPERT and 5 meaning NO
KNOWLEDGE AT ALL *
1 2 3 4 5
No
Expert
knowledge
Is racial profiling a problem in the community you reside or grew up in? *

Yes
No
Project #2 36
In the last 3 years how many times have you directly experienced RACIAL PROFILING? *
Often (once a month)
Periodically (every three months)
Seldom (twice a year)
Rarely (once a year)
Never
In the last 3 years how many times have you indirectly experienced RACIAL PROFILING? * Indirectly
meaning: while with a co -worker, friend, relative etc.
Periodically (every three months)
Seldom (twice a year)
Rarely (once a year)
Never
Do you think RACIAL PROFILING is an issue that should be addressed by the Government? *
Yes
No
Do you think that the Government has the abillity to eliminate RACIAL PROFILING? *
Yes
No
If Government worked to eliminate RACIAL PROFILING, which method do feel would be most effective?
*
Written Policy
Officer Training
Use of technology during every traffic stop (video cameras, recorders, etc.)
Citizen involment boards that review alleged cases on an annual basis
Project #2 37
Questionnaire Approval
amanda powe <poweamansowk300@gmail.com>
Re: Racial Profiling Survey

1 message
j m <sowk300@gmail.com> Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:42 AM
To: poweamansowk300@gmail.com
APPROVED
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:24 AM, <poweamansowk300@gmail.com> wrote:
Message from poweamansowk300@gmail.com:

here is the revised copy of my survey
Click to open:
• Racial Profiling Survey
Google Docs makes it easy to create, store and share online documents, spreadsheets and
presentations.
Project #2 38
Codebook File
Project #2 39

Project #2 40

Project #2 41

Project #2 42
Syntax Files
Project #2 43

Project #2 44

Project #2 45

Project #2 46
SPSS Printouts
Project #2 47

Project #2 48

Project #2 49

Project #2 50

Project #2 51

Project #2 52

Project #2 53

Project #2 54

Project #2 55

Project #2 56

Project #2 57

Project #2 58

Project #2 59

Project #2 60

Project #2 61

Project #2 62

Project #2 63

Project #2 64

Project #2 65

Project #2 66

Project #2 67

Project #2 68

Project #2 69

Project #2 70

Project #2 71

Project #2 72

Project #2 73

Project #2 74

Project #2 75

Project #2 76
SPSS Data File

Project #2 77
Rate your
Survey Research Report-Student
knowledge of the Questionnaire & Survey If Government
subject RACIAL In the last 3 years In the last 3 years Do you think worked to
PROFILING with 1 Is racial profiling a how many times how many times RACIAL PROFILING Do you think that eliminate RACIAL
Data Coding File being an EXPERT problem in the have you directly have you indirectly is an issue that the Government
and 5 meaning NO community you experienced experienced should be has the abillity to
PROFILING, which
Usemethod do feel
of technology
KNOWLEDGE AT reside or grew up RACIAL RACIAL addressed by the eliminate RACIAL would
during be traffic
every most
Timestamp Your Age Your Gender Your Race ALL in? PROFILING? PROFILING? Government? PROFILING? effective?
stop (video
Citizen cameras,
involment
3/9/2010 14:50:23 21-24 Female African American 3 Yes Never Never (twice a
Seldom Yes No recorders,
boards thatetc.)
review
3/9/2010 14:57:38 25-40 Male African American 3 No Rarely (once a year) year) Yes Yes Written
alleged Policyon an
cases
Citizen involment
3/9/2010 15:00:35 under 21 Female African American 1 Yes Rarely (once(every
Periodically a year) Rarely (once a year) Yes No annual
boards basis
that review
3/9/2010 23:09:08 under 21 Male African American 3 Yes three months) Rarely (once a year) Yes Yes Written
alleged
Use Policyon an
cases
of technology
3/9/2010 23:14:15 under 21 Female African American 4 No Never Never
Periodically (every No No annual every
during basis traffic
3/9/2010 23:15:43 21-24 Male African American 2 Yes Often (once (every
Periodically a month) Periodically
three months)(every Yes Yes Officer
stop Training
(video
Citizen cameras,
involment
3/9/2010 23:16:44 25-40 Male African American 1 Yes three months) three months) Yes Yes recorders,
boards thatetc.)
review
3/9/2010 23:19:09 21-24 Female Hispanic 4 Yes Never
Seldom (twice a Never
Seldom (twice a No Yes Written Policyon an
alleged involment
Citizen cases
3/9/2010 23:19:47 25-40 Male African American 2 No year) year) Yes No annual
boards
Use basisreview
that
of technology
3/9/2010 23:24:01 21-24 Female African American 4 Yes Rarely (once
Seldom (twicea ayear) Rarely (once a year) Yes Yes Officer
alleged
during
Use Training
casestraffic
every
of technologyon an
3/9/2010 23:25:10 under 21 Male African American 1 Yes year)
Periodically (every Never Yes Yes annual
stop
during basiscameras,
(video
every traffic
3/9/2010 23:26:09 25-40 Male African American 2 Yes three months)
Seldom (twice a Rarely (once a year) Yes Yes recorders,
stop (videoetc.)
cameras,
3/9/2010 23:38:09 21-24 Male African American 1 Yes year) Never Yes Yes recorders, etc.)
3/9/2010 23:38:58 under 21 Female African American 5 No Never (twice a
Seldom Never (twice a
Seldom No No Officer
Use Training
of technology
3/9/2010 23:41:17 21-24 Male African American 4 No year) year) Yes No Officer
during
Use Training
every traffic
of technology
3/9/2010 23:43:28 21-24 Female African American 4 Yes Never Never No Yes Officer
stop
during Training
(video
every cameras,
traffic
3/9/2010 23:59:50 under 21 Male African American 3 Yes Never Never Yes Yes recorders,
stop (video
Citizen etc.)
cameras,
involment
3/10/2010 0:09:12 under 21 Female African American 3 Yes Never Rarely (once a year) Yes No recorders,
boards thatetc.)
review
3/10/2010 0:36:15 25-40 Male African American 3 Yes Never Often (once a(every
Periodically month) Yes Yes Officer
alleged
Use Training
cases on an
of technology
3/10/2010 5:33:05 25-40 Female African American 3 Yes Never three months) Yes No annual
during
Use basis traffic
every
of technology
3/10/2010 6:43:46 21-24 Female Other 5 No Never
Periodically Never
(every Periodically (every No No Written
stop
during Policy
(video
every cameras,
traffic
stop
Use of(video etc.)
cameras,
technology
3/10/2010 7:16:20 under 21 Male African American 3 Yes Never Never
Periodically (every Yes Yes recorders,
during
Use everyetc.)
traffic
of technology
3/10/2010 7:17:37 21-24 Female African American 1 Yes Rarely
Seldom(once
(twicea ayear) three
Seldommonths)
(twice a Yes Yes Written
stop (video
during
Citizen Policy
every cameras,
traffic
involment
3/10/2010 7:21:03 21-24 Female Other 2 No year) year) Yes No recorders,
stop
boards thatetc.)
(video cameras,
review
3/10/2010 7:28:47 55 and over Female White 3 No Never Never Yes No recorders,
alleged
Citizen etc.)on an
cases
involment
3/10/2010 7:30:06 under 21 Female African American 1 Yes Rarely (once a year) Never Yes No annual
boards
Use basisreview
that
of technology
3/10/2010 7:38:17 21-24 Female African American 5 Yes Rarely (once a year) Rarely (once a year) Yes Yes Written
alleged
during
Use Policytraffic
cases
every
of technologyon an
3/10/2010 7:54:48 under 21 Male African American 1 No Never
Periodically (every Rarely (once(every
Periodically a year) Yes No annual
during
Citizen basis
stop (video
every cameras,
traffic
involment
3/10/2010 8:01:59 25-40 Male African American 2 Yes three months) three months) Yes No recorders,
stop
boards thatetc.)
(video cameras,
review
3/10/2010 8:02:53 21-24 Female African American 2 Yes Rarely (once a year) Rarely (once a year) Yes Yes recorders,
alleged
Use etc.)on an
cases
of technology
3/10/2010 8:26:46 under 21 Female African American 2 Yes Rarely (once a year) Rarely (once a year) Yes No annual every
during basis traffic
3/10/2010 8:29:28 under 21 Female African American 5 No Never Never No No Officer
stop Training
(video cameras,
3/10/2010 8:37:14 25-40 Female African American 1 Yes Rarely (once a year) Rarely (once a year) Yes Yes recorders, etc.)
3/10/2010 9:05:50 under 21 Female African American 4 Yes Never Never Yes Yes Officer Training
3/10/2010 9:10:12 21-24 Male African American 5 No Never Never No No Officer Training
Citizen involment
3/10/2010 9:12:41 21-24 Female African American 3 Yes Never Often (once a month) No No Officer
boards
Use Training
that review
of technology
3/10/2010 9:23:51 21-24 Female African American 2 Yes Rarely (once(every
Periodically a year) Rarely (once a year) Yes Yes Officer
alleged
during Training
casestraffic
every
Use of technology on an
3/10/2010 9:26:24 25-40 Female African American 3 No three months) Often (once
Seldom a month)
(twice a Yes Yes annual
stop
Use basiscameras,
of(video
during every traffic
technology
3/10/2010 9:46:52 25-40 Female African American 3 Yes Rarely (once(every
Periodically a year) year) Yes No recorders,
stopof(video
during
Use everyetc.)
cameras,
traffic
technology
3/10/2010 10:42:14 21-24 Male African American 1 Yes three months) Rarely (once
Seldom (twicea ayear) Yes No recorders,
stop
during(video
Citizen everyetc.)
cameras,
traffic
involment
3/10/2010 11:07:54 25-40 Male African American 1 Yes Rarely (once
Seldom (twicea ayear) Periodically
year) (every Yes No recorders,
stop
boards
Use thatetc.)
of(video cameras,
review
technology
3/10/2010 11:10:41 25-40 Female African American 3 Yes year) three months) Yes No recorders,
alleged
during everyetc.)
cases on an
traffic
3/10/2010 11:15:09 under 21 Female African American 1 Yes Rarely (once
Seldom (twicea ayear) Seldom
(twice a Yes Yes annual
stop basis
(video
Citizen cameras,
involment
3/10/2010 11:43:20 25-40 Female African American 3 Yes year) year) Yes No recorders,
boards
Use thatetc.)
review
of technology
3/10/2010 12:29:12 55 and over Female African American 2 No Rarely (once a year) Rarely (once a year) No No Writtenevery
alleged
during Policytraffic
cases on an
3/10/2010 12:56:41 under 21 Male African American 1 Yes Often (once a month) Often (once a month) No No annual
stop
Use basiscameras,
of(video
technology
3/10/2010 12:59:32 21-24 Male African American 2 Yes Rarely (once a year) Rarely (once a year) Yes No recorders,
during
Use everyetc.)
traffic
of technology
3/10/2010 13:00:02 under 21 Female African American 3 Yes Never
Periodically Never
(every Periodically (every Yes Yes Written
stop
during Policy
Use of(video
every cameras,
traffic
technology
stopof(video
during
Use everyetc.)
cameras,
traffic
technology
3/10/2010 13:04:26 25-40 Female African American 5 Yes Often (once
Seldom a month)
(twice a Often (once a month) Yes Yes recorders,
stop
during(video
everyetc.)
cameras,
traffic
3/10/2010 13:44:35 25-40 Male African American 2 Yes year) Often (once a month) Yes Yes recorders,
stop
Use of(video etc.)
cameras,
technology
3/10/2010 15:07:50 21-24 Male African American 2 Yes Often (once a month) Seldom
(twice a Yes No recorders,
during
Use everyetc.)
traffic
of technology
3/10/2010 15:18:45 under 21 Female African American 4 No Rarely (once
Seldom (twicea ayear) Seldom
year) (twice a Yes No Officer
stop
during Training
(video
every cameras,
traffic
3/10/2010 17:10:19 21-24 Female African American 1 Yes year)
Periodically year)
(every Periodically (every Yes No recorders,
stop (video
Citizen etc.)
cameras,
involment
3/10/2010 18:10:13 21-24 Female African American 4 Yes three months) three
Seldommonths)
(twice a No No recorders,
boards
Use thatetc.)
review
of technology
3/10/2010 19:11:28 25-40 Male African American 3 No Rarely (once a year) year) Yes No Writtenevery
alleged
during Policytraffic
cases on an
3/10/2010 19:38:26 21-24 Female Hispanic 2 Yes Often (once
Seldom a month)
(twice a Often (once
Seldom a month)
(twice a Yes No annual
stop
Use basiscameras,
of(video
technology
3/10/2010 20:15:46 21-24 Female African American 5 Yes year) year) (twice a
Seldom No No recorders,
during everyetc.)
traffic
3/10/2010 20:30:41 under 21 Male African American 4 Yes Often (once (every
Periodically a month) year) No No Written
stop Policy
(video cameras,
3/10/2010 20:40:09 41-54 Female White 3 No three months) Rarely (once a year) Yes No recorders, etc.)

Project 2

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Descrizione originale:

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Project 2

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Project #2 1

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

Description of the problem

When officers pull over individuals as suspects in a crime because of their

racial profiling, there needs to be some efforts developed by governments at

form developed by the government in the form of policy, use of technology,

be received by conducting this research. The research will look at the

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

for a analysis of the person.

respondents respond. In the case of communities and if racial profiling a

will also be a great presence of women throughout the bivariate cases.

these factors have as huge a role as determined here in the hypotheses.

observing their contributions very interesting. When looking at the other

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

Gender Frequency Percent

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

Gender Frequency Percent

Race Frequency Percent

African American 92 92%

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

Knowledge of Racial Profiling

Rating Frequency Percent

Racial Profiling in Community

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

Racial Profiling Directly Experienced

Response Frequency Percent

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

Racial Profiling indirectly Experienced

Response Frequency Percent

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

Response Frequency Percent

Can government Eliminate R P?

Response Frequency Percent

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

How can Government eliminate R P?

Response Frequency Percent

Written Policy 20 20%

Officer Training 21 21%

Citizen Inv. 29 29%

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

Univariate Graph 1 Age of Respondent

Univariate Graph 2 Gender of Respondent

Univariate Graph 3 Race of Respondent

Univariate Graph 4 Respondents knowledge of Racial Profiling

Univariate Graph 5 Is racial profiling a problem in the

community respondent resides or grew

Univariate Graph 6 In the last 3 years how many times have

respondent directly experienced Racial

Univariate Graph 7 In the last 3 years how many times have

respondent indirectly experienced Racial

Univariate Graph 8 Do you think Racial Profiling is an issue that

should be addressed by the Government?

Univariate Graph 9 Do you think that the Government has the

ability to eliminate Racial Profiling?

Univariate Graph 10 If government worked to eliminate Racial

Profiling, which method do you feel would

be the most effective?

Survey Research Report-Student Questionnaire & Survey

directly experienced Racial Profiling by

directly experienced Racial Profiling by race

Bivariate Graph 2 Do you think Racial Profiling is an issue that