Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PETITIONERS
Of 2016
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
WRIT
PETITION
UNDER
ARTICLES
226/227
OF
THE
1.
2.
10
Lakhs
as
per
rules
for
allotment
of
tenders
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
8.1 That the Respondent no. 1 issued a Notice Inviting Tender on dated
03/09/2015 for the transportation of forest produce woods and bamboo
used for Commercial purpose in division Gariyaband/Balodabazar
under circle Raipur in five phases on different dates. This Notice Inviting
Tender contains the terms and conditions. A copy of Notice Inviting
Tender is being filed herewith as Annexure P-2.
8.2
forest division Gariyaband in third phase of the bid. Due to the reason
that the Chief conservator of forest has got the decisions making
powers only up to the amount of 10 lakhs and the bids submitted were
of higher amounts, Chief conservator of Forest, Raipur circle sent the
recommendation for allotment of tender to the petitioners to the office of
Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Production) for the
approval on dated 26/11/2015. A copy of recommendations dated
8.3
That a letter was issued to Petitioner No. 1 herein from the office
16/10/2015.
Vide
this
letter
permission
was
granted
for
8.4
8.5
The
8.6
The
8.7
8.8
8.9
That
8.10
, inter alia, on the following grounds:-
9. GROUNDS URGED
9.1
9.2
That
9.3
That
9.4
That
That in the light of above submissions, the petitioner prays for the
following relief(s):
10.1 That this Honble Court be pleased to call for the entire records
pertaining to issuance of the impugned order for its perusal.
10.2 That this Honble Court be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of
mandamus quashing the impugned order (Annexure P-1).
10.3 That any other order or orders, direction or directions, writ or writs,
as this Honble Court may deem fit under the facts and circumstances
of the case may also be issued in favour of the petitioner against the
respondents.
10.4 That costs of the petition may also be awarded to the petitioner.
It is certified that due care has been taken in the case comply with the
provisions of the Chhattisgarh High Court Rules, 2006.
BILASPUR
DATE
RANBIR SINGH MARHAS
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER
PETITIONERS
Of 2016
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
1.
2.
the facts and grounds mentioned in the writ petition for the purposes of
this application as well.
3.
That for the reasons mentioned in the petition, the same is most
likely to be allowed.
4.
5.
herewith.
PRAYER
Bilaspur
Date
RANBIR SINGH MARHAS
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER
PETITIONERS
Of 2016
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
1.
2.
3. That the documents attached with the petition are true and genuine
copies of their respective originals and I have not suppressed any
material information.
Deponent
VERIFICATION
Identified by me
Deponent
PETITIONERS
Of 2016
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
AFFIDAVIT
1.
2.
That along with the attached writ petition I have also filed an
application for interim relief. The application for interim relief has been
drafted as per my instructions and the content thereof from paragraphs
1 to 5 are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge and
belief.
Deponent
VERIFICATION
Identified by me
Deponent