Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Department of Geological Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
Offshore wind turbines (OWTs) are generally supported by large-diameter monopiles, with the combination of axial forces, lateral
forces, bending moments, and torsional moments generated by the OWT structure and various environmental factors resisted by
earth pressures mobilized in the soil foundation. The lateral loading on the monopile foundation is essentially cyclic in nature and
typically of low amplitude. This state-of-the-art review paper presents details on the geometric design, nominal size, and structural
and environmental loading for existing and planned OWT structures supported by monopile foundations. Pertinent ocean-environment loading conditions, including methods of calculation using site-specic data, are described along with wave particle kinematics, focusing on correlations between the loading frequency and natural vibration frequency of the OWT structure. Existing
methods for modeling soil under cyclic loading are reviewed, focusing in particular on strain accumulation models that consider
pilesoil interaction under cyclic lateral loading. Inherent limitations=shortcomings of these models for the analysis and design
of existing and planned OWT monopile foundations are discussed. A design example of an OWT support structure having a monopile foundation system is presented. Target areas for further research by the wind-energy sector, which would facilitate the development of improved analyses=design methods for offshore monopiles, are identied.
Keywords: foundation, lateral load, monopile, ocean environment, soil, strain accumulation
Introduction
There has been a rapid growth in the use of offshore (and
onshore) wind farms for the production of clean and renewable energy. The economic development of wind farms
depends on efcient solutions being available for a number
of technical issues, one aspect being the foundations. Offshore wind-turbine (OWT) structures may be found on gravity base, suction caisson, monopile, tripod or braced frame
(jacket) foundations or, more recently, using oating platforms tethered to the seabed (Figure 1). The foundation
choice largely depends on the water depth, seabed characteristics, loading characteristics, available construction technologies, and importantly, economic costs (Malhotra 2011).
Offshore foundations are subjected to a combination of
loads, namely the axial (self-weight) forces of the
structure=machinery (V), repeating horizontal=lateral loads
(H), and bending (M) and torsional moments. Apart from
the self-weight, these loads are generated by environmental
conditions (ocean waves, currents, tidal action, and aerodynamic load cycles) and=or operation of the installed machinery (Figure 2). The lateral loading is essentially cyclic in
nature and typically of low amplitude. For geotechnical
Address correspondence to Muhammad Arshad, Department
of Geological Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology, GT Road Lahore, Pakistan. E-mail: arshadm@tcd.ie
design, the proportion and importance of the different loading types essentially depend upon the kind of foundation
system being considered. For gravity-base foundations
(Figure 1a), potential failure modes may be in bearing
capacity or excess settlement; hence, the vertical load is generally the major design consideration (Malhotra 2011). For
monopile foundations (Figure 1b), lateral deection
(rotation) of the monopile controls the serviceability limit
state of the whole structure; hence, lateral loads are more
critical when compared with the vertical loads.
In general, offshore foundations must be designed to
resist large numbers of aerodynamic and hydrodynamic load
cycles of varying direction, amplitude, and frequency
(Figure 2) at the proposed site over the projects lifetime of
typically 25 years or more (S ahin 2004). In most parts
of the world, the most popular foundation choice in terms
of ease of installation, economy, and logistics is the monopile, with an estimated 75% of all installed OWTs using this
solution (Blanco 2009; Fischer 2011; Malhotra 2011). For
OWT monopile foundation systems, the lateral loads (and
resulting moments) are generally large in proportion to the
axial loads. Hence, the foundation response under repeating
lateral loading is a major consideration, with the foundation
design dominated by considerations of the dynamic and fatigue responses under working loads, rather than the ultimate
load-carrying capacity. The overall feasibility of a wind-farm
project is invariably determined by upfront capital costs,
.
.
Magnitude
Vertical load
Horizontal load
Bending moment
Torsional moment
35 MN
16 MN
562 MN m
4 MN m
4
2011), creating even more onerous design loading scenarios
for (monopile) foundations.
OWT monopile foundations are typically manufactured
from steel tubular sections having outer diameters of up to
7.5 m, wall thicknesses of up to 150 mm, and embedment
(penetration) depths of between 15 and 30 m (Achmus,
Kuo, and Abdel-Rahman 2009). Monopiles are generally
used in shallow water depths (i.e., typically <30 m), generally becoming too exible for water depths between 30
and 40 m, in which case, monopiles tted with guy wires or
tripod solutions (see Figure 1) are considered as economical
alternatives. For greater depths, time-consuming installation
and the effects of soil degradation (potholing), which
occurs at seabed level around the pile, make monopile foundation solutions prohibitive (Irvine et al. 2003). Other foundation options, as illustrated in Figure 1, are then considered
as viable options. The serviceability limit state is largely
determined by the lateral deection (rotation) of the monopile under many millions of load cycles; e.g., 107 lateral load
cycles of 1.4 MN magnitude (corresponding to the fatigue
loading for design) are expected to occur over the service life
of OWT structures (GL 2005).
ln Z=Z0
ln 10=Z0
1
2
Aerodynamic Loading
Wind conditions are important in dening, not only the
loads imposed on a wind turbines structural components,
but also in predicting the amount of future energy produced
as a function of wind velocity. A realistic assessment of wind
direction through statistical analysis of recorded wind data
must be based on a realistic representation of wind speed
(preferably occurring at hub height), speed frequency distribution, wind shear (i.e., rate of change in wind speed with
height), turbulence intensity (i.e., standard deviation of wind
speeds sampled over a 10 min period as a function of the
mean speed), wind direction distribution, and also extreme
wind gusts with return periods of up to 100 years (DNV
2011). The mean value of the 10 min period wind speed data
measured at a reference elevation of 10 m above mean sea
level (usually determined at hub height for OWTs) is referred
to as the wind speed U 10 , from which the mean wind speed
U z for some other height, Z, above mean sea level can be
approximated using either the power law or logarithmic
law given by:
Fig. 5. Denitions of harmonic wave propagation and parameters. (a) In time domain. (b) In three-dimensional space.
coshkhw kz
cos kx xt
sinhkhw
vt fa x
sinhkhw kz
sin kx xt
sinhkhw
vt fa xekz sinkx xt
Finertia t
p
q CM D2 u_ t
4 w
1
Fdrag t qw CD D ut jutj
2
10
11
ua D
W
12
KC
ua T
D
13
3:04
2
EI
4p 0:227 lLi Mt Li 3
14
Soil deposits can be classied in many ways; e.g., by formation process, grain size (ne or coarse), plasticity index, age
(recent or aged deposits), mineralogical content, etc. Apart
from at very small strain levels of <103 strain (Atkinson
and Sallfors 1991; OKelly and Naughton 2008), the stress
strain relationship for soil is generally highly nonlinear
(inelastic) (Budhu 2011), with the strength and stiffness
properties strongly dependent on stress history, drainage
conditions (drained or undrained) and the stress path
followed during loading. For undisturbed deposits,
Benaben 1996); the number of load cycles and the stress level
(Pappin 1979; Lentz and Baladi 1981; Li and Selig 1996;
Lekarp and Dawson 1998; Chai and Miura 2002) or the
number of load cycles, stress level and material properties
(Niemunis, Wichtmann, and Triantafyllidis 2005; Karg
2007). A major limitation to their application in offshore
foundation design calculations is that none of these models
explicitly consider the (mono)pilesoil interaction under lateral loading. In reality, the pile deection (rotation) response
under lateral loading arises from the soil behavior, which is
dependent on the loading conditions. A few models have
been tailored for this particular scenario; these are described
in the next section, in the context of the design of OWT
monopile foundations. A discussion on numerical modeling,
considering dynamic constitutive soil models, torsional loading, and damping related issues, is beyond the scope of this
review article. Details on these topics can be found in Basack
and Dey (2012), Basack and Sen (2014), Guo (2006, 2013)
and Rani and Prashant (2014).
10
15
where e1 is the strain response at the end of the rst load cycle
and exponent m is a parameter that accounts for the inuence
of the soil properties, pile material, installation method, and
loading characteristics, with experimentally derived m values
ranging 0.040.09 for the exible test piles investigated (Little
and Briaud 1988). In this context, the lateral strain is calculated
as the piles lateral deection occurring at the seabed level divided by its outer diameter; a dimensionless quantity.
Numerical studies by Kuo, Achmus, and Abdel-Rahman
(2012) indicated an m value of 0.07 for exible piles (agreeing with the experimental range reported by Little and Briaud
(1988)) and 0.135 for rigid piles. The validity of Eq. (15) has
been veried using cyclic lateral load test data obtained for
model piles installed in medium-dense quartz sand (Peralta
and Achmus 2010). It has also been shown that the value of
exponent m can be evaluated from consolidateddrained cyclic triaxial test data (Peralta and Achmus 2010). Nevertheless,
Eq. (15) is empirical and formulated on limited test data
(N < 20) for a loose to medium dense sand deposit.
Model of Long and Vanneste (1994)
The Long and Vanneste (1994) model is based on a closedform solution for a pile in an elastic foundation soil, with
the soil reaction modulus increasing linearly with depth.
By applying this approach and using input parameters
derived from reported eld data for cyclic lateral load tests
performed on thirty-four piles of different lengths, diameters, materials, and installation techniques, Long and
Vanneste (1994) proposed that the accumulated lateral strain
occurring at ground surface level for N load cycles can be
estimated by:
en
AH
EI0:4 nhN 0:6
BM
EI0:6 nhN 0:4
16
17
where nh1 is the coefcient of soil reaction for the rst cycle
of loading, its value dependent on the relative density of the
soil and the location of the groundwater table (Terzaghi
1955; Reese, Cox, and Koop 1974), with the exponent t (having a recommended range of 0.20.4 (Broms 1964; Davisson
1970)) determined empirically by:
t 0:17 FL Fi FD
18
19
L
FL Fi FD
Tt
20
11
21
12
Fig. 11. Degradation of soil secant modulus (Es) under cyclic loading.
epNN
EsN1
22
24
25
13
Fig. 13. Functions relating (a) Tb and (b) Tc to the cyclic load
characteristics in terms of fb and fc respectively.
Mmax
MR
26
fc
Mmin
Mmax
27
14
Tb fbb Tc fcc
30
Pmax
Pu
31
fcc
Pmin
Pmax
32
15
Parameter
Magnitude
350 tonnes
126 m
10.1 rpm
6.912.1 rpm
4 m=s
11 m=s
25 m=s
33
34
35
Vw (m=s)
Uc (m=s)
Hs (m)
Hmax (m)
Load type
1
5
10
50
33.9
38.0
39.8
43.9
0.70
0.80
0.84
0.94
7.72
9.03
9.60
10.91
14.35
16.80
17.85
20.29
Aerodynamic
Hydrodynamic
Total
Lateral force, H
(MN)
Bending moment, M
(MN.m)
1.42
9.27
10.69
127
298
425
16
thrust on the rotor, in addition to the different critical
combinations of wind and wave loading, as reported in
several guidelines=standards (API 2010; DNV 2011).
17
38
v0 adjusted value 0:8v0from Equation 37:
Lc
L
39
HTt 3
MTt 2
Bv0
EI
EI
40
HTt 2
MTt
Bh0
41
EI
EI
where Av0, Bv0, Ah0, and Bh0 are sets of non-dimensional
coefcients (scalars) whose values are dependent on the
depth along the embedded length of the pile and Tt (EI=
nh)0.2, with the value of the coefcient of soil modulus variation, nh, dependent on the soil relative density and the
location of the groundwater table (Terzaghi 1955; Reese,
Cox, and Koop 1974).
For the seabed (ground surface) level, the values of coefcients Av0, Bv0, Ah0, and Bh0 are 2.43, 1.62, 1.62, and 1.75,
respectively, with these coefcients decreasing in value with
increasing depth along the pile embedment length, reecting
the reduction in v0 and h0 as we move down along the
h0 Ah0
18
Fig. 19. Summary of the results deduced using the Matlock and
Reeses (1960) method.
19
Qd Qf Qb fAsur qAb
42
Discussion
There is no overall agreement in the literature regarding the
determination of the piles rotation=lateral deformation
response to the many millions of low-amplitude lateral load
cycles associated with OWT monopile foundation scenarios.
Considerable differences of opinion exist on the rate of cyclic
strain accumulation; e.g., power function (Little and Briaud
1988) and logarithmic-trend relationships (Lin and Liao
1999) have been proposed. Most of the reported eld and
laboratory pile tests were performed for medium dense sand
(Little and Briaud 1988; LeBlanc 2009; Bienen et al. 2012).
Compared with the Bienen et al. (2012) and LeBlanc
(2009) models which are based on N 104 lateral load cycles,
other widely used models for predicting the piles rotation=
lateral displacement response, including the API (2010),
DNV (2011), Little and Briaud (1988) and Long and
Vanneste (1994) approaches, are based on experimental data
for relatively few load cycles (N < 200). Since no reliable
model presently exists, design requirements regarding the
piles rotation=lateral displacement behavior under monotonic (static) extreme load are used as a substitute. Areas
warranting further in-depth research are the effects on
monopile behavior of:
. Soil properties; e.g., relative density, over-consolidation
loading;
. Combined (e.g., axial and lateral) cyclic loading.
20
would also be helpful in generating computer code for
numerical simulations of more realistic conditions, especially
in-situ soil conditions and in-service loading characteristics.
Acknowledgment
References
Abdel-Rahman, K. and M. Achmus. 2011. Behavior of foundation
piles for offshore wind energy plants under axial cyclic loading.
Proceedings of the SIMULIA Customer Conference, Barcelona,
Spain, Dassault Syste`mes Press, Paris, France, 1719th May
2011, 33141.
Achmus, M. 2010. Design of axially and laterally loaded piles for the
support of offshore wind energy converters. Proceedings of the
Indian Geotechnical Conference GEOtrendz2010, Mumbai,
India, December 1618th, 2010, 92102.
Achmus, M., Y.-S. Kuo, and K. Abdel-Rahman. 2009. Behaviour of
monopile foundations under cyclic lateral load. Computer and
Geotechnics 36(5): 72535. doi:10.1016=j.compgeo.2008.12.003
API (American Petroleum Institute). 2010. Recommended practice for
planning, designing and constructing xed offshore platforms
Working stress design. API RP 2A-WSD (R2010), 22nd ed.,
API Publishing Services, Washington, DC, USA.
Arshad, M. and B. C. OKelly. 2013. Offshore wind-turbine structures:
A review. Proceedings of the ICE, Energy 166(4): 13952.
doi:10.1680=ener.12.00019
Arshad, M. and B. C. OKelly. 2014. Development of a rig to study
model pile behaviour under repeating lateral loads. International
Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 14(3): 5467.
doi:10.1680=ijpmg.13.00015
Atkinson, J. H. and G. Sallfors. 1991. Experimental determination of
stressstraintime characteristics in laboratory and in-situ tests.
Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Soil Mechanics
and Foundation Engineering, Florence, Italy. Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, May 2630th, 1991, Vol. 3, 91556.
Barksdale, R. D. 1972. Laboratory evaluation of rutting in base course
materials. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the
Structural Design of Asphalt Pavement, London, UK, September
1115th, 1972, Vol. 1, 16174.
Bartolomey, A. A. 1977. Experimental analysis of pile groups under lateral loads. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, July 10
15th, 1977, 18788.
Basack, S. and S. Dey. 2012. Inuence of relative pile-soil stiffness and
load eccentricity on single pile response in sand under lateral cyclic
loading. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 30(4): 73751.
doi:10.1007=s10706-011-9490-1
Basack, S. and S. Sen. 2014. Numerical solution of single piles
subjected to pure torsion. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 140(1): 7490. doi:10.1061=(asce)gt.1943-5606.
0000964
Batchelor, G. K. 1967. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bhattacharya, S., J. A. Cox, D. Lombardi, and D. M. Wood. 2012.
Dynamics of offshore wind turbines supported on two foundations. Proceedings of the ICE, Geotechnical Engineering 166(2):
15969. doi:10.1680=geng.11.00015
Bienen, B., J. Duhrkop, J. Grabe, M. F. Randolph, and D. J. White.
2012. Response of piles with wings to monotonic and cyclic lateral
loading in sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
21
22
Malhotra, S. 2011. Design and construction considerations for offshore
wind turbine foundations in North America. Proceedings GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling and Design, West
Palm Beach, Florida, USA, February 2024th, 2010, ed. D. O.
Fratta, A. J. Puppala, and B. Muhunthan, Vol. 2, 153342, GSP
199. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates, Inc.
Matlock, H. 1970. Correlation for design of laterally loaded piles in soft
clay. Proceedings of the 2nd Offshore Technology Conference, 22
24th April 1970, Houston, TX, USA. Paper Number 1204. Vol. 1,
7794.
Matlock, H., and L. C. Reese 1960. Generalized solutions for laterally
loaded piles. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations
Division ASCE 86(5): 6394.
Moayed, R. Z., I. Mehdipour, and A. Judi. 2012. Undrained lateral
behavior of short pile under combination of axial, lateral and
moment loading in clayey soils. Kuwait Journal of Science and
Engineering 39(1B): 5978.
Morison, J. R., J. W. Johnson, and S. A. Schaff. 1950. The forces
exerted by surface waves on piles. Journal of Petroleum Technology
2(5): 14954. doi:10.2118=950149-g
Naughton, P. J. and B. C. OKelly. 2004. The induced anisotropy of
Leighton Buzzard sand. Proceedings Advances in Geotechnical
Engineering: The Skempton Conference, London, UK, March
28th31st, 2004, ed. R. J. Jardine, D. M. Potts, and K. G. Higgins,
Vol. 1, 55667. London, UK: Thomas Telford.
Naughton, P. J. and B. C. OKelly. 2005. Yield behavior of sand under
generalized stress conditions. Proceedings of the 16th International
Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka,
Japan, September 1216th, 2005. IOS Press. Vol. 2, 55558.
Nicolai, G. and L. B. Ibsen. 2014. Small-scale testing of cyclic laterally
loaded monopiles in dense saturated sand. Journal of Ocean and
Wind Energy 1(4): 24045.
Niemunis, A., T. Wichtmann, and Th. Triantafyllidis. 2005. A highcycle accumulation model for sand. Computers and Geotechnics
32(4): 24563. doi:10.1016=j.compgeo.2005.03.002
OKelly, B. C. 2005. Consolidation anisotropy of some natural soft
soils. Proceedings of the International Conference on Problematic
Soils, Famagusta, North Cyprus, May 2527th, 2005, ed. H. Bilsel
and N. Zalihe, Vol. 3, 118392. North Cyprus: Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
OKelly, B. C. 2006. Compression and consolidation anisotropy of
some soft soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 24(6):
171528. doi:10.1007=s10706-005-5760-0
OKelly, B. C. and P. J. Naughton. 2005a. Development of a new hollow cylinder apparatus for stress path measurements over a wide
strain range. Geotechnical Testing Journal 28(4): 34554.
doi:10.1520=gtj12252
OKelly, B. C. and P. J. Naughton. 2005b. Engineering properties of
wet-pluviated hollow cylindrical specimens. Geotechnical Testing
Journal 28(6): 57076. doi:10.1520=gtj12325
OKelly, B. C. and P. J. Naughton. 2008. Local measurements of the
polar deformation response in a hollow cylinder apparatus. Geomechanics and Geoengineering 3(4): 21729. doi:10.1080=
17486020802400981
OKelly, B. C. and P. J. Naughton. 2009. Study of the yielding of sand
under generalized stress conditions using a versatile hollow cylinder torsional apparatus. Mechanics of Materials 41(3): 18798.
doi:10.1016=j.mechmat.2008.11.002
Pappin, J. W. 1979. Characteristics of granular material for pavement
analysis. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham.
Paute, J.-L., P. Hornych, and J. P. Benaben. 1996. Repeated load triaxial testing of granular materials in the French Network of Laboratories des Ponts et Chaussees. Flexible Pavements: Proceedings of
the European Symposium Euroex, Lisbon, Portugal, September
2022nd, 1993, ed. A. G. Corriea, 5364. Rotterdam, The
Netherlands: Balkema.
23
Appendix
Fig. A1. Pertinent stiffness proles for the medium dense sand
deposit considered in the OWT monopile foundation design
example.