Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Our Story
Volunteer
Twitter
Facebook
Youtube
RSS
Home
Presidential Race
War & Peace
Threats to Democracy
Big Money
Earth
Mindscape
Blog
Podcast
Home Page
Donate
Our Story
Presidential Election
Threats to Democracy
Big Money
Earth
Mindscape
Blog
Podcast
Deep Politics
January 27, 2016 | Presented by Milicent Cranor
Disinformation Part 1: How Trolls Control an Internet Forum
An Insiders Guide to Online Disinformation
You have probably met these people online. Photo credit: Tristan Schmurr /
Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
You may well wonder about the material we have chosen to present below. For one
thing, it has been around for a while, though mostly on obscure websites. For
another, its authors are unknown. More important, we cannot say how accurate,
overall, is the analysis offered in it.
Nonetheless, it is tantalizing and raises some important issues, no matter its
provenance.
The document claims to reveal the techniques dirty tricks, really that are
practiced by trolls, saboteurs, provocateurs, disinformants, spies and other
government operatives, as well as their fellow practitioners of the dark arts.
One thing is certain: weve all experienced the frustration of dealing with this
phenomenon. We just dont always recognize it for what it is.
Without even knowing it, you
Perhaps in a political forum
facts and points of view. Or
controversial article. Or in
disruption of the Socialist Workers Party (1961), the Ku Klux Klan (1964), Black
nationalist groups such as the Black Panther Party and the Nation of Islam (1967
),
and the entire New Left, including community and religious groups (1968).
The US Senates so-called Church Committee (chaired by Sen. Frank Church of
Idaho), which investigated Cointelpro, reported, Bureau witnesses admit that
many of the targets were nonviolent and most had no connections with a foreign
power. Such targets included nonviolent citizens against the war in Vietnam,
the nonviolent Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and prominent civil
rights workers.
The FBI claims Cointelpro operations ended in 1971.
Did they? The Internet did not exist during the period the FBI admits Cointelpro
was active, but the author
Techniques. Wherever they
our readers probably know,
have greatly expanded upon
Part 1 is about methods for taking control of a news group. These instructions
were presumably written by a Cointelpro operative to be used by other operatives
and not the general public, so they are not always clear. We have therefore
rewritten some of these passages, and we offer explanations parenthetically when
we think they are needed. Wherever possible, we try to preserve the style of the
original document.
If you have a better explanation for any of the actions described below, or if
you want to add your own observations to this ongoing collection, please let us
know. We would love to hear from you.
The bottom line: Our purpose here is to inform you about some of the dirty
tricks that may be shaping and distorting what you read online. Far from
endorsing these attempts to hijack free and open discourse, we believe that
exposing them can help blunt their power to confuse and control. Forewarned is
forearmed.
********************************************************************
Note to readers: The following is the text found on the Internet, as discussed
above. The source and background are unknown.
********************************************************************
Cointelpro Techniques for Control of an Internet Forum
.
There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of an internet
forum. Most involve dilution and misdirection. We will go over each technique
and demonstrate that even a minimal number of operatives can eventually gain
control of an uncontrolled forum.
Forum Sliding
.
If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum, it
can be quickly removed from public view by forum sliding. This maneuver brings
unrelated postings to the top of the forum, and the critical posting slides
down the front page out of public view. [Ed.: Bysensitive posting of a
critical nature, the author refers to comments that include facts that
interfere with the false narrative being promoted.]
In this technique a number of harmless posts are quietly pre-positioned on the
forum and allowed to age. This is done in anticipation of troublesome postings.
Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon to trigger a
forum slide.
Several fake accounts should be ready when called upon. To trigger a forum
slide and flush the critical post out of public view, it is simply a matter
of logging into each account, both real and fake, and then replying to pre-positio
ned
postings with a simple one- or two-line comment.
Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the unwanted posting, it is now
lost in a sea of unrelated and useless postings. This effectively focuses the
attention of forum readers on non-issue items.
Inoculating the Public Against the Truth
.
A second highly effective technique is what we call consensus cracking.
Heres how we develop a consensus crack: Under the guise of a fake account, a
posting is made which looks legitimate but the critical point is that it has
very weak back-up. [Ed.: We assume this counterfeit posting contains some of the
same points being made by those attempting to reveal the truth, but in a weaker
form. Think of it as an inoculation. ]
Once this is done, then, under alternative fake accounts, a very strong position
in your favor [Ed.:your meaning the disinformants favor] is slowly introduced
over the life of the posting.
It is imperative that both sides are initially presented, so that uninformed
readers cannot determine which side is the truth but assume they have seen all
the relevant facts on both sides of the issue.
As postings and replies are made, the stronger evidence or disinformation in
your favor is slowly seeded in.
Thus, uninformed readers will most likely accept the disinformation. But even if
they dont, they will probably drop their opposition to your posting.
However in some cases where the forum members are highly educated and can
counter your disinformation with real facts and linked postings, you can then abo
rt
the consensus cracking by initiating a forum slide.
planckbrandt
The other place these techniques emerge is discussions about the money system
and the nature of money itself.
MrE23
Cant believe you didnt call out and highlight this: and the taping of the
activity can be then used for intelligence gathering purposes without having
to stage a fake abuse video
Which implies that there are cases when the production of fake videos is seen as
a legitimate and useful tactic.
Mr Worthington
Wow. Bravo WWW. One of my favorite articles that you guys have done yet! looking
forward to parts 2+3.
One thing sticks out in my mind: the Reddit politics section. It is so terrible
and impossible to post anything there, I havent looked at it in years.
stevor
I saw a regular group of trolls on McClatchy news and when I posted the TRUTH,
they (probably using multiple log-ins) would click on the button to have my
comments deleted. Then there is the common attack of saying you need to take
your meds or something about wearing a tinfoil hat. If that doesnt work,
they frequently call names and/or use profanity to intimidate anybody.
On some sites, I called a person out as being a troll and then a regular to
the site confirmed it.
joe mcivor
These instructions were presumably written by a Cointelpro operative to be used
by other operatives They could also have been posted to the obscure websites
mentioned by a troll to establish his/her anti-state credentials .
Pingback: Mnchen Sextreffen()
Pingback: Cointelpro | Michigan Standard()
JdL
The author lost all credibility with me when she referred to the man-made
causes of climate change, as if it were an established fact rather than the
fantasy of half-wits.
Jay_Sherman
Most forums these days dont even need a government disinformant to effectively
control and silence anyone who posits a non-mainstream idea or kernel of truth,
because most forums practice censorship- and the standards used to determine who
and what gets censored, are the tenets of the religion of political-correctness.
Since the majority of people have been indoctrinated into this religion via the
media and government education, it is a given that most forum owners practice it
,
and have no problem finding moderators who share the faith- so now the
government can just sit back and relax, as the peons do what they were
programmed to do- and you virtually never even hear so much as a grumble about
free-speech, because such values have been eradicated from modern (un)consciousn
ess
by the purveyors of the PC cult.
Those who do not love and strive for freedom, will lose it.
Pingback: Disinformation Part 2: Detailed Tips for Trolls - WhoWhatWhy()
Pingback: How Trolls Control an Internet Forum (ZOA) | It Ain t Christian - Or
is it?()
Pingback: What is free and freedom? - Connect()
Pingback: yamaha exciter 150 ()
Pingback: ()
Pingback: ()
Pingback: A Child Massacre Examined - WhoWhatWhy()
Pingback: ()
Pingback: Disinformation Part 1: How Trolls Control an Internet Forum |
Philosophers Stone()
Pingback: Disinformation Part 1: How Trolls Control an Internet Forum |
Alternative News Network()
Pingback: ()
Pingback: Disinformation Part 3: COINTELPRO Up Close and Personal - WhoWhatWhy()
Pingback: NEW THIS WEEK | The Divine Eye()
Pingback: ()
Pingback: IDing COINTELPRO Mason Dixon Tactical()
Pingback: IDing COINTELPRO | Prepper s Survival Homestead()
First Name:
Last Name:
Email address:
Weekly WhoWhatWhy WhoWhatWhy Now
The WhoWhatWhy Blog
Will D.C. Madams Infamous Little Black Book Emerge?
UPDATE: Sirhan Denied Parole; RFK Friend Distraught
Picks