Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, Peoples Republic of China
b
Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macao, Macao, Peoples Republic of China
Received 5 April 2002; accepted 28 June 2002
Abstract
Vertical proles, horizontal proles and size distribution of airborne particulate matter were measured near major
roads in Macao using DustTrak and TEOM monitors. A signicant decrease in the concentrations of PM10, PM2.5 and
PM1, as the height above the ground increases from 2 to 79 m, was found. At the height of 79 m, the concentrations of
PM10, PM2.5 and PM1, decrease to about 60%, 62% and 80% of the maximum occurring at 2 m above the ground,
respectively. However, the horizontal proles near another major road revealed there was no signicant trend of
decrease in concentrations of particulate matter as the distance from the road increases. Over the total measured
distance (0228 m), the maximum decreases of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 are only 7%, 9% and 10%, of the maximum
occurring at 2 m from the road, respectively. The daytime averaged PM2.5 and PM1 contribute 6667% and 5160%,
respectively, of the total PM10 mass after the particle readings by DustTrak were recalibrated by TEOM. It showed that
ne particles and submicrometer particles contributed a major part of PM10 at the roadside in Macao, which is most
likely attributed to the combinations of local sources including exhausted particulate matter from vehicles and
resuspended ne dust, and secondary particles (sulfate, nitrate and ammonium) of regional scales.
r 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: PM10; PM2.5; PM1; Vertical prole; Horizontal prole; Particle size distribution; Trafc
1. Introduction
Throughout the last 30 years, an increasing body of
research has consistently shown statistically signicant
positive associations between ambient PM10 and daily
mortality counts and various indices of morbidity, and
these associations appear stronger for ne particles,
which are generally marked as PM2.5 (US EPA, 1996;
Vedal, 1997; IIASA, 2000a, b). Based on the totality of
evidence, many countries and international organizations issued air quality standards for airborne particulate matter to protect public health. PM10 and PM2.5
were introduced as a standard in the US in 1987 and
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +86-10-6278-2195; fax: +8610-6277-3650.
E-mail address: hjm-den@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn (J. Hao).
1352-2310/02/$ - see front matter r 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 1 3 5 2 - 2 3 1 0 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 4 6 7 - 3
4908
79m
6 (D2)
Building
5 (D4)
59m
Up
4 (D3)
30m
19m
8m
2m
3 (D1)
Site 1
1 (D6)
4909
2 (D5)
4910
Site 2
Building
2m
2 (D2)
42m
3 (D6)
72m
4 (D4)
120m
5 (D3)
170m
6 (D5)
228m
Building
Site 3
2 (D3, D6, D2)
Building
Site 4
Building
2 (D3, D6, D2)
Building
Mount, which is about 34 km south from the monitoring sites. Hourly data of wind speed, wind direction,
temperature, relative humidity and precipitation were
used for this work. Wind directions followed a similar
pattern during most of the sampling period (about 5
days), which were characterized by northerly wind.
However, about 3 days of sampling followed another
directions of southeasterly wind. The sampling roads
were chosen that the winds were perpendicular or nearly
perpendicular to them during most of the sampling
period.
The trafc ow was acquired by counting the number
of cars, light-duty trucks, heavy-duty vehicles (including
buses) and motorcycles for 30 min of each hour from
8:00 a.m. to 20:00 p.m. The average trafc ow per hour
4911
Table 1
Results of parallel measurement with 6 DustTrak monitors at the same site
DustTrak
PM10
PM2.5
a
D1
D3
D4
D5
D6
2b
Ratio
0.945
1.030
0.928
0.968
0.984
0.992
0.960
0.946
0.999
0.950
PM1
Ratio
14
6
6
8
6
0.953
0.977
0.918
0.924
0.973
0.997
0.989
0.994
0.989
0.996
Ratio
R2
8
8
8
8
8
0.972
0.972
0.896
0.943
0.994
0.999
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
5
8
8
6
8
PM2.5 (12/5/2001)
0.350
0.250
(a)
(b)
TIME
19:00
18:00
17:00
TIME
PM1 (12/6/2001)
0.400
1(D6)
2(D5)
3(D1)
4(D3)
5(D4)
6(D2)
0.350
0.300
CONC. (mgm-3)
16:00
8:00
19:00
18:00
17:00
16:00
15:00
14:00
13:00
12:00
0.000
11:00
0.000
9:00
0.050
10:00
0.100
13:00
0.100
12:00
0.200
0.150
11:00
0.300
0.200
9:00
CONC. (mgm-3)
0.400
8:00
CONC. (mgm-3)
0.500
1(D6)
2(D5)
3(D1)
4(D3)
5(D4)
6(D2)
0.300
15:00
1(D6)
2(D5)
3(D1)
4(D3)
5(D4)
6(D2)
0.600
14:00
PM10 (12/4/2001)
0.700
10:00
4912
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
(c)
19:00
18:00
17:00
16:00
15:00
14:00
13:00
12:00
11:00
10:00
9:00
0.000
8:00
0.050
TIME
0.300
PM2.5 (12/5/2001)
PM1 (12/6/2001)
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4913
4914
0.300
0.250
0.250
0.200
0.200
0.150
CONC. (mgm-3)
1(D1)
2(D2)
3(D6)
4(D4)
5(D3)
6(D5)
0.100
0.050
1(D1)
2(D2)
3(D6)
4(D4)
5(D3)
6(D5)
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
(a)
(b)
TIME
19:00
18:00
17:00
16:00
15:00
14:00
13:00
12:00
11:00
9:00
8:00
19:00
18:00
17:00
16:00
15:00
14:00
13:00
12:00
11:00
9:00
10:00
8:00
0.000
10:00
CONC. (mgm-3)
PM2.5 (12/12/2001)
PM 10 (12/11/2001)
0.300
TIME
PM1 (12/10/2001)
0.300
1(D1)
2(D2)
3(D6)
4(D4)
5(D3)
6(D5)
CONC. (mgm-3)
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
(c)
19:00
18:00
17:00
16:00
15:00
14:00
13:00
12:00
11:00
10:00
9:00
8:00
0.000
TIME
0.200
0.180
0.160
0.140
0.120
0.100
PM10 (12/11/2001)
PM25 (12/12/2001)
PM1 (12/10/2001)
0.080
0.060
0.040
0.020
0.000
0
50
100
150
200
250
4915
Table 2
Size distribution of particulate matter concentrations near major roads
Sampling sites
Location 1
Location 1
Location 2
Location 2
PM2:5 =PM10 PM1 =PM10 PM2:5 =PM10 PM1 =PM10 PM2:5 =PM10 PM1 =PM10 PM2:5 =PM10 PM1 =PM10
Arithmetic mean R% a
0.952
Recalibrated mean R% r b 0.656
Standard deviation sr
0.009
Number of samples n 11
0.833
0.575c
0.013
11
0.970
0.669
0.011
10
0.796
0.549c
0.011
12
0.965
0.665
0.053
9
0.866
0.597c
0.014
10
NAd
NAd
NAd
NAd
0.738
0.509c
0.049
10
%
R=size
fraction by DustTraks only, not recalibrated by TEOM yet.
R% r =readings of DustTraks were recalibrated by TEOM (see Fig. 8).
c
Assumes that PM1 could be recalibrated the same ratio as PM2.5 (0.0029, see Fig. 8b).
d
NA=not available because of the power malfunction of D6.
a
PM10
DUSTTRAK CONC. (mg m-3)
0.250
y = 0.002x
R2 = 0.8182
0.100
0.050
0.000
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
(a)
PM2.5
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
y = 0.0029x
R2 = 0.9114
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
0.0
(b)
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
TEOM CONC. (ug m-3)
100.0
4916
Location 1
Location 1
Location 2
Location 2
3 a
PM10 (mg m )
sb/nc
0.116
0.017/11
0.109
0.015/11
0.204
0.047/9
0.258nn
0.045/9
0.111
0.015/11
0.106nn
0.014/11
0.193
0.050/10
NAd
NAd
0.097
0.013/11
0.086n
0.012/11
0.186
0.049/10
0.195nnn
0.025/10
0.600
0.500
0.400
y = 6E-05x + 0.0072
R2 = 0.6055
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
(a)
PM 2.5
PM 10
0.450
0.400
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
1000
(b)
2000
3000
PM 1
0.450
0.400
0.350
0.300
y = 5E-05x + 0.0146
R2 = 0.6695
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
0
(c)
1000
2000
3000
4000
Hourly traffic flow
5000
4000
5000
4917
Table 4
Sampling periods and meteorological conditions used in the study
Sampling site
Date
WS (m s 1)a
WDb
P (mm)c
RH (%)d
Site 1 (PM10)
12/4/2001
2.9 (1.73.9)
61 (4879)
Site 1 (PM2.5)
12/5/2001
4.1 (2.85.4)
69 (6474)
Site 1 (PM1)
12/6/2001
6.9 (5.77.9)
64 (6071)
Site 2 (PM10)
12/11/2001
4.3 (3.85.9)
79 (7781)
Site 2 (PM2.5)
12/12/2001
2.9 (1.45.6)
72 (6281)
Site 2 (PM1)
12/10/2001
7.9 (6.99.2)
1.6 (08:00)
81 (7590)
Site 3
12/3/2001
3.0 (2.04.1)
0.2 (11:00)
0
72 (6479)
Site 4
12/7/2001
5.2 (3.18.5)
61 (5371)
4918
Acknowledgements
The research described in this paper is funded by the
National Natural Science Foundation of China &
Macao Foundation (Grant No. 40045015). The authors
thank Jingnan Hu and Litao Wang (DESE, TU) for
their contribution to the collection of the samples, and
Mr. Freed, C.N. of US EPA for his helpful advice to
improve our paper.
Appendix A
The detailed sampling periods and meteorological
conditions are listed in Table 4.
References
Depaul, F., 1985. A tracer study of dispersion in an urban street
canyon. Atmospheric Environment 19, 555559.
Fu, L.X., Hao, J.M., Hertel, O., Berkowicz, R., 2000. Modeling
trafc-related air pollution in street canyons of Beijing.
Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 50,
20602066.
Hao, J.M., Fu, L.X., He, K.B., Wu, Y., 2000. Urban Vehicular
Pollution Control-International Experience and Chinese
Practice. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing,
China, pp. 454479 (in Chinese).
He, D.Q., Hao, J.M., He, K.B., Fu, L.X., 1998. Calculating
emission factors of motor vehicles using model. Environmental Science 19 (3), 710 (in Chinese with abstract in
English).
He, D.Q., Hao, J.M., Fu, L.X., Zhou, Z.P., Liu, Y., Wang,
Z.S., Tang, U., 1999. Pollution assessment in urban street
canyons of Macao using OSPM model. Acta Scientiae
Circumstantiae 19 (3), 256261 (in Chinese with abstract in
English).
Hitchins, J., Morawska, L., Wolff, R., Gilbert, D., 2000.
Concentrations of submicrometre particles from vehicle
emissions near a major road. Atmospheric Environment 34,
5159.
Hoydysh, W., 1988. Kinematics and dispersion characteristic of
ows in asymmetric stray canyons. Atmospheric Environment 22, 26772689.
IIASA, 2000a. Airborne ne particulates in the environment: a
review of health effect studies, monitoring data and
emission inventories. Interim Report IR-00-004.
IIASA, 2000b. A review of particulate matter and health: focus
on developing countries. Interim Report IR-00-005.
Janssen, N.A.H., Vanmansom, D.F.M., Vanderjagt, K.,
Harssema, H., Hoek, G., 1997. Mass concentrations and
elemental composition of airborne particulate matter at
street and background locations. Atmospheric Environment
31 (8), 11851193.
Lam, G.C.K., Leung, D.Y.C., Niewiadomski, M., Pang, S.W.,
Lee, A.W.F., Louie, P.K.K., 1999. Street-level concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and suspended particulate matter
in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment 33, 111.
Lamoree, D.P., Turner, J.R., 1999. PM emissions emanating
from limited-access highways. Journal of the Air and Waste
Management Association 49 (9), 8594.
Leu, L.Th.de, 1992. Study of air quality along freeways outside
the built-up area in the province South-Holland. TNOReport No. R92/003, Delft (in Dutch).
Morawska, L., Thomas, S., Gilbert, D., Greenaway, C.,
Rijnders, E., 1999. A study of the horizontal and vertical
prole of submicrometer particles in relation to a busy road.
Atmospheric Environment 33, 12611274.
Roorda-Knape, M.C., Janssen, N.A.H., De Harthog, J.J., Van
Vliet, P.H.N., Harssema, H., Brunekreef, B., 1998. Air
pollution from trafc in city districts near major motorways.
Atmospheric Environment 32 (11), 19211930.
US EPA, 1996. Air quality criteria for particulate matter. EPA/
600/P-95/001cf, National Service Center for Environmental
Publications, Cincinnati, OH.
Vedal, S., 1997. Ambient particles and health: lines that divide.
Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 47,
552581.