Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

United States Attorney Carmen M.

Ortiz
District of Massachusetts

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: CHRISTINA DiIORIO-STERLING


April 15, 2010 PHONE: (617)748-3356
WWW.USDOJ.GOV/USAO/MA E-MAIL: USAMA.MEDIA@USDOJ.GOV

APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS LAWYER’S CONVICTION IN STOLEN ART CASE


Two Paintings Stolen in 1978 to be Returned

BOSTON, Mass. - Late yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the First
Circuit affirmed the conviction and prison sentence of a one time Massachusetts state prosecutor.
The case arose from the 1978 theft of seven paintings from Stockbridge, Mass. – the largest
burglary from a private residence in Massachusetts history and one of the largest art thefts in the
U.S.

United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz and Warren T. Bamford, Special Agent in
Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Field Division, announced that the Court
of Appeals affirmed in all respects, the conviction and seven year prison sentence of ROBERT
M. MARDIROSIAN, 74, of Falmouth, Mass. on charges that he possessed stolen property that
had crossed a U.S. boundary knowing it to be stolen.

The case began on Memorial Day weekend in 1978 with the burglary of seven pieces of
valuable artwork from a Stockbridge home, including the Cezanne painting, Bouilloire et Fruits.
The alleged thief, David Colvin, left them with MARDIROSIAN, a Massachusetts defense
attorney and former assistant district attorney in Middlesex County. MARDIROSIAN had
represented Colvin in another case in federal court in Boston. Four months later, Colvin was
murdered.

MARDIROSIAN stored the paintings in Watertown, Mass. until 1988, when he moved
them out of the country, ultimately placing them in the vault of a Swiss bank. In 1999, he
attempted to sell the paintings through an intermediary in London, inadvertently alerting the
London-based Art Loss Register (ALR), an organization that assists in the recovery of stolen art
and antiquities. On behalf of the original owner, the ALR reached out to the intermediary in an
effort to recover the paintings. In response, the intermediary, on MARDIROSIAN’s behalf,
demanded a $15 million ransom for their return.

After months of negotiations, in October 1999, the ALR brokered an “agreement”


between the owner and a Panamanian corporation that MARDIROSIAN had set up as a front to
conceal his identity, whereby the corporation was to hand over the most valuable painting, the
Cezanne, in exchange for the owner’s relinquishing all claims to the remaining six paintings. At
the time, the paintings were valued at approximately $1 million. The agreement was signed in
Geneva, Switzerland, where the Cezanne was delivered by an unidentified driver who pulled up
in a car where MARDIROSIAN’s lawyer was standing, handed him a wrapped package
containing the Cezanne, and promptly sped off. Two months later, the owner auctioned the
Cezanne through Sotheby’s in London for $29.3 million.

MARDIROSIAN held onto the remaining paintings until 2003, when he tried to sell
them through other intermediaries. MARDIROSIAN arranged to have the paintings brought to
a Swiss bank for valuation and authentication by Sotheby’s. In 2005, MARDIROSIAN
arranged for four of the six paintings to be sent to Sotheby’s for transport from Geneva to
Sotheby’s in London - after which the owner filed a lawsuit seeking to void the 1999
“agreement” with the Panamanian Corporation.

The four paintings, Portrait d’une Jeune Fille and Portrait d’un Jeune Homme by Chaim
Soutine, Maison Rouge by Maurice Utrillo, and Flowers by Maurice de Vlaminck were
eventually returned to the rightful owner. The remaining two stolen paintings, Woman Seated
and Boy by Jean Jansen were recovered by the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Office. With the
completion of the appeal, the Government will return the last two paintings to the owner – some
32 years after they were stolen.

On appeal, the Court rejected MARDIROSIAN’s argument that the 1999 Geneva
agreement transferred valid title to the six remaining paintings to MARDIROSIAN. The Court
held that the contract was void because its purpose was illegal; it required the owner to pay what
in effect was a ransom for the return of his own property.

The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation with assistance from
the Art Loss Registry and its President, Julian Radcliffe. It was prosecuted by Assistant U.S.
Attorneys Jonathan F. Mitchell and Ryan M. DiSantis of Ortiz’s Economic Crimes Unit, with the
assistance of Trial Attorney Collette Ford of the Justice Department’s Office of International
Affairs.

###

Potrebbero piacerti anche