Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
des sciences
/ tditions
scientifiques
Palaeontology
/ Pal6ontologie
(Vertebrate
Palaeontology
/ Palbontologie
des
et medicales
Elsevier
Vert6br6s)
Thomasa*,
Jack Rogerb, Mohammed
Bourdillon
, Eric Buffetaut,
Henri
Tong, Denis Vasletb
a College
75005
b BRGM,
de France
et laboratoire
Paris,France
SGN, 3, av. C.-Guillemin,
c Ministry
d BRGM
of Petroleum
and Mineral
Resources,
Deputy
Ministry
Mission,
Ministry
of Petroleum
and Mineral
Resources,
e UMR
5561,
16, tour
BP 6009,
du Libgat,
f Laboratoire
de palkontologie,
34095
Montpellier
cedex
g Laboratoire
de pakontologie,
(Received
de palbontologie,
Halawani,
Abdallah
Memeshd,
Patrick Lebretb,
Cappettaf, Claude Cavelierb,
Didier Dutheilg,
9 September
75013
UMR
5, France
UMR
1999,
new assemblage
of
sider the age of the top unit of
assemblage
contains
the remains
representing
a new dermochelyid
and a revision
of the stratigraphic
important
hiatus
at the
Arabian
Peninsula/
vertebrates
K-T
Paris,
8569,
MusCum
after
8569,
Orleans
Mu&urn
cedex
national
dhistoire
naturelle,
8, rue Buffon,
2, France
for Mineral
Resources,
Jeddah,
Kingdom
DMMR
Jeddah,
Kingdom
of Saudi Arabia
of Saudi
Arabia
France
kern,
Universitb
revision
Montpellier-2,
national
CC 064,
dhistoire
8 November
naturelle,
place
8, rue
Eugene-Bataillon,
Buffon
75005
Paris,
France
1999)
marine
vertebrates
from
northern
Saudi
Arabia,
east of the Nafud,
leads us to
the Aruma
Formation,
the Lina Member,
hitherto
referred
to the Maastrichtian.
of a dozen
selachian
and actinopterygian
fishes,
as well
as those of a giant sea
taxon.
It suggests
a Late Paleocene
to Early Eocene
age for this unit. This new
position
of the Lina Member
demonstrate
the existence,
on a regional
scale,
boundary.
Saudi
45060
5554,
accepted
Abstract-A
UMR
Arabia
(0
1999
/ Aruma
Acadkmie
des sciences
Formation
/ K-T
/ iditions
boundary
/ late
scientifiques
et medicales
Paleocene/
Early
Elsevier
Eocene/
reconThis
turtle
dating
of an
SAS.)
fauna/
R&umk - Une faune irkdite de vertkbrks marins provenant du Nord de 1Arabie Saoudite, P lest du Nafud, nous am&e 2
rajeunir lunitk sommitale de la formation dAruma, le membre de Lina, jusqualors attribuk au Maastrichtien. Cette faune, qui
comprend les restes dune douzaine de poissons selaciens et actinoptkygiens,
ainsi quune tortue marine gkante, representant un
dermochelyide nouveau, permet dattribuer P cette unit6 un Pge Palko&ne supkrieur 2 Locke infkrieur. Cette nouvelle datation et
la revision de la position stratigraphique du membre de Lina demontrent lexistence, P lkchelle regionale, dun important hiatus ~3
la limite K-T. (0 1999 Acadkmie des sciences / editions scientifiques et mkdicales Elsevier SAS.)
phimule
Arabique
faune / vert&br&
/ Arabie
Version abegee
Note
communicated
* Correspondence
Saoudite
(voir
/ formation
dAmma
/ limite
K-T / Pal&&me
p. 910)
by Yves Coppens.
and reprints.
de la terre
et des plan&es
/ Earth
& Planetary
Sciences
suphieur
/ fioche
infhieur
H. Thomas
et al.
1. Introduction
The
Cretaceous-Tertiary
boundary,
known
for
mass
extinction,
has not ceased
to attract
the attention
of a
large
number
of researchers
over
the past 20 years.
On
the Arabian
Peninsula,
most work
concerning
this subject
was
done
some
time
ago,
though
there
are rare
exceptions
(see Roger
et al., 1998).
In addition,
a degree
of confusion
exists
in this area of the world
with respect
to the nature
of the K-T boundary,
usually
perceived
as
transitional
despite
some
precursor
biostratigraphical
work
(Hasson,
1985),
which
showed
at least locally,
the
existence
of a major
hiatus.
Recent
exploration
in Saudi
Arabia,
has led to reconsideration
of the nature
of the K-T transition
in the central region
of the Arabian
plate.
investigations
respect
were
largely
obscured
until
the present
paucity
of fauna1
associations
and the absence
in this
by the
of strati-
graphically
useful
faunas
in beds straddling
the K-T transition
(Lina Member).
Revision
of some work
was made
possible
because
of the recent
discovery
in the northern
region
of the Kingdom,
to the east of the Nafud,
of atypical marine
vertebrate
fossils
in sediments
of the Lina
Member,
hitherto
attributed
to the Maastrichtian.
Analysis of these fossils,
principally
collected
to the east of the
small
village
of Linah,
have
led us, as will
be seen further on, to considerably
rejuvenate
this unit,
denoting
also the existence
of a major
hiatus
at the K-T boundary,
which
conforms
readily
to ideas which
have
emanated
from
more
recent
2. Geological
work
on the Arabian
peninsula.
In central
and
northern
Arabia
(figure),
Late
Cretaceous
deposits
form
arc-shaped
outcrops
that
are
roughly
draped
around
the Proterozoic
basement
to the
west.
These
deposits
constitute
a fairly
continuous
strip
extending
from
the edge of the Rubal
Khali
sand-sea
in
the south,
to the Riyadh
area in central
Arabia;
further
north,
they
skirt
the east and
the northeast
of Great
Nafud
sand-sea
and continue
into Iraq. Studied
by petroleum
geologists
during
the early
days of oil exploration
in Saudi
Arabia
(Steineke
et al., 1958;
Powers
et al.,
1966;
Powers,
1968),
these
deposits
were
named
the
Aruma
Formation
and attributed
a Campanian
to Maastrichtian
age. Detailed
mapping
at 1:250
000 scale (Vaslet et al., 1988,
1991)
in the Riyadh
area, contributed
to
the collection
biostratigraphic
data that reconfirmed
the
earlier
conclusions
of the oil geologists,
i.e., a Late Campanian
to Maastrichtian
age for the Aruma
Formation.
the Aruma
AIAramah
main
units,
C. R. Acad.
Quaternary
Cenozoic
Neogene
FZl
Paleogene
ForPlathe
eolian
sands
volcanic
rocks
Mesozoic
LE
Paleozoic
Arabian
shield
/
Figure.
Geological
fossil
vertebrate
Situation
dans
sketch
localities
gkologique
le Nord
lower
setting
c]
des gisements
de IArabie
boundary
map of northern
of Linah.
Saudi
2 vert6br6s
Arabia
fossiles
showing
de Linah
Saoudite.
of the
formation
being
a minor
uncon-
formity
above
the Albian
to Turonian
Wasia
Formation
deposits.
Their
basal
informal
Atj member
was a thick
unit,
mainly
composed
of carbonates
with
rudists;
the
overlying
informal
Lina Member
was principally
composed
of shale,
and was thinner
than
the Atj member
(Powers
et al., 1966;
Powers,
1968).
This two-member
division
was further
justified
by a non-conformable
contact
between
the two
members,
seen
at outcrop
but
more particularly
in drill cores where
it was described
as
an angular
discordance
(Redmond,
in Powers,
1968).
Using
this work,
El-Asaad
(1983a,
b) maintained
the formal Lina Member
and divided
the informal
Atj member
into two formal
members:
the Khanasir
Member
at the
base and the Hajajah
Member
above.
The
Aruma
Formation
is overlain
by the
Umm
er
Radhuma
Formation,
Paleocene
to Early Eocene
in age
(Steineke
et al., 1958;
Sander,
1962;
Powers
et al., 1966;
Powers,
1968);
this formation
is composed
of limestone
and dolomite
deposited
on a marine
platform.
At outcrop,
the dolomitic
limestone
of the Umm
er Radhuma
Formation
overlies
the Lina Member
dolomitic
shale
in
apparent
conformity.
Al-Asaad
(1983a)
confirmed
the
conformable
and gradational
character
of this contact.
However,
a compilation
of data
on a regional
scale
(Powers,
1968)
suggested
a possible
lacuna
of deposits
approximately
straddling
the
K-T
transition;
Powers
(1968)
mentioned
the possibility
of a non-conformable
relationship
between
the Umm
er Radhuma
and Aruma
de la terre
et des plan&es
Late Paleocene
to Early Eocene
marine
vertebrates
Formations.
This hypothesis was confirmed
by Hasson
(1985) who found a major hiatus at the CretaceousTertiary boundary in the Rubal Khali.
4. The problematic
of the Lina Member
4.1.
The Lina
Member
Maastrichtian
in central
and northern
age
Arabia
If, as mentioned
above, the precise age of the onset of
the last transgression
during the Late Cretaceous
is still
under discussion for central and northern Arabia, most
authors agreed on the standard proposition
for the Lina
Member:
Maastrichtian
for the oil geologists (Powers et
al., 1966; Powers,
1968), Late Maastrichtian
for ElAsaad (1983b) and Vaslet et al. (I 988, 1991).
In fact, this age is still a problem:
the undoubted
Maastrichtian
fauna1 association
described
by Powers
(1968) from subsurface samples (with Omphalocyc/us
macroporus
and Lofiusia sp.), was never found again
during surface sampling by the geologists who restudied
the type sections (first El-Asaad then the DMMR/BRGM
team that mapped central Arabia). Everywhere, the outcrops were very poor in fossils and no large benthic
foraminifera
were found. Faced with this difficulty, ElAsaad and Vaslet used El-Khayals work (1969, 1974)
for dating the Lina Member. They mention the presence
of Omphalocyclus
in shale underlying
the dolomitic
limestone of the Umm er Radhuma Formation, the latter
containing
an uncontested
Tertiary fauna. However, the
age of the shale was not confirmed
by Hasson (1985),
who noticed that this rock was azoic and proposed an
Early Paleocene age for this unit. This contradictory
result demonstrates
that the question of the origin and exact stratigraphic
position
of El Khayals facies with
Omphalocyclus
is still open. Did he really sample the
Lina Member, or did the samples come from the top of
the underlying
Hajajah
Member?
It should also be
pointed out that the exact origin of the samples studied
by El-Khayal in his PhD thesis (1969) is uncertain, and
that the precise location of his cutting samples from the
Arabian
American
Oil Company
(ARAMCO)
was not
confirmed during the paleontological
study.
4.2. The lateral
equivalents
Arabian
Peninsula
in the
de la terre
et des plan&es
/ k&h
from
the Uppermost
Aruma
Formation
(northern
Saudi
Arabia)
Nafud
and
Sciences
H. Thomas
yielded
turtle
et al.
hundreds
associated
of bone fragments
from
a giant marine
with
many
selachian
and actinoptery-
gian teeth,
most of them
washing
the samples.
small
the
only
discovered
common
in
continent
the Upper
Cretaceous
where
it is reported
on
from
the
the
by
Maghreb,
Egypt,
subsaharan
Africa
and the Negev.
A
different
form
of E. libycus
is also present
in the Moroccan Danian
(Arambourg,
1952),
as well
as in intercalated sediments
in the Deccan
traps,
the ages of which
are situated
on both sides of the K-T boundary
(Patterson, 1993).
Vertebrate
remains
collected
in the shaley
horizon
of
Lina Member
contain
on one hand,
a relatively
poor
5. The vertebrate
Member
and
dus is very
Arabia-African
ichthyofauna
made
up mainly
of isolated
teeth
commonly
reduced
to a state of debris,
and on the other,
a
very
large
number
of isolated
ossicles
belonging
to a
dermochelyid
turtle.
5.1.
Selachians
The Lamniformes
are represented
by a single
tooth,
the morphology
of which
resembles
Cretolamna
maroccana which
is only
known
from
the Maastrichtian;
this
tooth
is however
neither
perfectly
preserved
nor particularly typical.
The Orectolobiformes
are in quite
diverse
contrast
since
they
are represented
by three
different
genera;
Orectolobus,
Ginglymostoma
sp. and Plicatoscyllium
sp. Whilst
several
very
fragmentary
scyliorhinid
teeth recall
those from the Paleogene
genus
Premontreia,
the batoids
constitute
the most
numerous
and
varied
eral teeth
with
a very
distinct
and original
morphology,
can
be attributed
to Dasyatoidea.
Lastly,
the
Myliobatidae
are represented
by large
teeth
or tooth
debris
characterized
by their
greater
thickness;
certain
teeth
show
morphology
close
to that of Rhombodus,
a genus
which
does not cross
the K-T boundary.
Unfortunately
5.2.
their
well
roots,
are consistently
be lateral
teeth
of large
About
15 grinding
teeth,
are diamond
to sub-diamond
shaped
and belong
to an indeterminate
pycnodontiform.
Their
sizes
vary
from
a few
millimetres
to 14 mm
in
length.
Pycnodontiform
teeth
have
been
reported
from
Around
lopiform
Umm
(Madden
ten acuminate
genus
fnchodus.
Himar
Formation
et al., 1995).
teeth
The
of
south-
are attributed
to the
largest
of these teeth,
aual-
though
broken
at its apex,
measures
45 mm. These
teeth
are very
similar
to those
of Enchodus
libycus
from
the
Maastrichtian
of Egypt and Morocco.
The genus
Encho-
908
found
C. R. Acad.
in the
same
deposits.
Chelonians
Testudines,
Cryptodira,
gen. and sp. nov.
The dermochelyid
mon fossils
yielded
sicle. These
ossicles
of a new dermochelyid
issue).
The family
Cretaceous
Jubal
Arabia
monly
Chelonioidea,
Dermochelyidae:
remains
are by far the most
by the Lina Member.
They are
comrepre-
sented
by several
hundred
isolated
ossicles,
polygonal
in
shape,
ranging
from
20 to 45 mm
in diameter,
very
thick,
some
more
than 20 mm in thickness,
and deeply
sculptured
on the external
surfaces,
with
wrinkles
and
tubercles
radiating
outward
from
the centre
of each os-
Actinopterygians
the Paleocene
western
Saudi
ered as a tetraodontiform.
However
doubt
has been cast
on its attribution
to the tetraodontiforms
by Patterson
(1993).
In fact, teeth conventionally
attributed
to the Eotrigonodontidae
are, according
to this author,
probably
pycnodontiform
teeth,
the pycnodontiforms
being
com-
5.3.
group.
The rhinobatoids
sensu
lato, are represented
by
two distinct
forms
(Rhinobatos
sp. and Rhinobatoidei
indet.),
the dental
morphology
of which
resembles
that of
certain
species
from
the Maastrichtian
of Morocco.
Sev-
these
teeth,
in particular
damaged.
In fact they may
Myliobatidae
indet.
These
teeth
resemble
those
of the genus
fotrigonodon
which
occurs
in the Eocene
of the Anglo-France-Belgian
basin
and in the Eocene
of Africa.
Although
the longest
incisiform
tooth
is more
than
25 mm in length,
other
broken
teeth,
must
have
attained
even
greater
dimensions. The genus
Eotrigonodon
is conventionally
consid-
represent
the epithecal
sea turtle
(see Tong
Dermochelyidae
to the Recent.
Two
is recorded
dermochelyid
shell mosaic
et al., in this
from
the
taxa
Late
are
known
from
the Late Cretaceous:
Corsochelys
from
the
Campanian
of the USA and Mesodermochelys
from
the
Maastrichtian
of Japan.
These
primitive
dermochelyids
have
a thecal
shell
like other
chelonioid
sea turtles,
without
an epithecal
shell
mosaic.
Few dermochelyid
turtle
remains
have
been
reported
from
the Paleocene:
fosphargis
from
the Latest Paleocene
of Denmark,
is the
only Paleocene
record
of the family.
In the Eocene
there
is a remarkable
diversity
of dermochelyids
from
all over
the world.
Except
for Eosphargis
from
the Lower
Eocene
of Europe,
which
is a dermochelyid
without
a shell mosaic, and Thalassochelys
testei from
the Lower
Eocene
of Tunisia,
known
only by a skull,
in all others
the thecal
shell
is replaced
by an epithecal
shell
composed
of a
large number
of small
ossicles
forming
a shell mosaic.
de la terre
et des plan6tes
Late Paleocene
6. Discussion
6.1.
to Early Eocene
marine
vertebrates
and conclusions
Although
not very diverse, the malacofauna
seems to
indicate an Eocene age, judging by a cast of Rode//aria
ampla and impressions
of Corbula (Bicorbula)
gr. exarata. Although the species exarata is considered
as typical of the Middle
Eocene, various similar forms have
been described from the Early to Middle Eocene of Pakistan and the northern part of Africa, from Egypt to Senegal. Conversely, these species seem to be unknown
in
the Upper Cretaceous, or even the Paleocene. This age
suggestion
is confirmed
by the malacofauna
from a
much more productive
locality, sampled by one of us
(C.C.) in the Lina Member in central Arabia. This site is
located south of the Wadi as Sahba, in the Ar Riyad
quadrangle
(Vaslet et al., 1991). It has yielded internal
casts, sometimes silicified, of Pleurotomaria
spp. including P. cf. bianconii,
Velates sp. aff. tibeticus,
Campanilopa spp., a large strombid,
cf. Rostellaria
(Hippochrenes) ampla, cf. Arrhoges
(Drepanochilus)
sp., cf.
Surcula ingens, naticids (S./J, bullids, Corbula IBicorhula) sp., besides corals and various nautiloids
identified
by H.Tintant (in Vaslet et al., 1991). With the exception
of the nautiloids,
which are Maastrichtian
in age and
may be reworked from the underlying
Hajajah Member,
in which they are locally abundant,
the malacofauna
from Wadi as Sahba, besides genera which cross the
Cretaceous-Tertiary
boundary,
is characterized
by typically Eocene genera and species, such as Velates, Pleurotomaria bianconii,
Rostellaria ampla, Surcula ingens,
Corbula (Bicorbula),
and, by the absence of any exclusively Cretaceous, or even Paleocene, element.
The Lina Member
ichthyofauna
shows an unusual
composition
that does not enable attribution
of a precise
age. The selachians in particular, are different from both
the rich Maastrichtian
fauna1 assemblages,
collected
these last few years from Syria, Israel and Egypt (currently being studied) and those of the Late Paleocene of
Jordan (H.C.). In addition,
as no data exists on Early
Paleocene fauna from this region of the Middle East, it is
all the more difficult to make a categorical determination
with respect to the age of the Saudi Arabian fauna. However the presence, on one hand of Myliobatidae
(although this family is represented
in the Campanian
and
Maastrichtian,
but by species showing
very different
morphology)
and on the other hand, the absence of species known in the Maastrichtian
of the region, tend to
favour a post-Cretaceous
age. Whilst a Danian age cannot be ruled out, it should be stressed that the selachians
are in any case very different to those from the Danian of
Morocco.
As is the case for the selachians, the biostratigraphic
data provided
by the rare actinopterygians,
identified
from isolated teeth, are very ambiguous. The presence of
indeterminate
pycnodontiforms
does not contribute
to
the argument since their remains are recorded from the
C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences
1999.329.905912
de la terre
et des plan&es
from
the Uppermost
Aruma
Formation
(northern
Saudi
Arabia)
Mesozoic
into the Cenozoic.
Whilst the Enchodus teeth
are close to f. lybicus and suggest a Maastrichtian
age,
the incisiform
and pharyngian
teeth, doubtfully
attributed to the Tetraodontiformes,
tend rather to suggest a
post-Cretaceous
age because of their large dimensions.
This said, it can be underlined
that the very poor state of
preservation
of the ichthyofauna
suggests that it is in
part, undoubtedly
reworked
from a Maastrichtian
horizon. The existence of reworked
material
is manifest
when seen in the light of the discovery, in the Lina Member, of a rolled ammonite
in the form of a cobble along
with a single fragment of a plesiosaur tooth. The major
lacuna of post K-T boundary deposits, which may correspond to a major part of the Paleocene,
must have reconcentrated,
along the Tertiary transgression
base, numerous fossils eroded out of the unit lying directly
below.
Be that as it may, with regard to the dermochelyid
remains, several evolutionary
trends have been recognised in the history of the Dermochelyidae,
including
a
progressive decrease in mosaic shell thickness, a gradual
increase in the prominence
of the carapace ridges and a
gradual decrease of the sculpture on the external surface
of the ossicles (Wood et al., 1996). The ossicles from
Saudi Arabia are the thickest among all the known dermochelyid
shell elements, the shell is the most deeply
sculptured
and the carapace ridges are absent since no
keeled ossicles are present among the abundant material
from the locality. Thus the dermochelyid
turtle from
Saudi Arabia is the most primitive known representative
of the dermochelyids
possessing an epithecal shell mosaic. These primitive features suggest that the specimens
from Saudi Arabia are older than the Mid-Late
Eocene,
at which time dermochelyids
with a more advanced epithecal shell mosaic are known.
Overall,
taking into account
all stratigraphic
and
palaeontological
data, we consider that the Lina Member deposits ought to be considered
as much younger
than hitherto thought, and we thus propose a Late Paleocene or Early Eocene age.
6.2. Implications
on the Cretaceous-Tertiary
in central
and northern
Saudi Arabia
boundary
H. Thomas et al.
lagic argillaceous
limestones
with planktonic
foraminifera (Hasson, op. cit.), which overlie the basal shales in
the Rubal Khali basin.
The dating of the Lina Member and the revision of its
stratigraphical
position shed a quite different light on the
Cretaceous-Tertiary
boundary
in central and northern
Arabia. Even if they were not able to prove it, the first
researchers for a long time suspected the existence of a
depositional
gap at the K-T boundary, basing this suspicion on regional data, but hindered
in this thought process by the supposed
Maastrichian
age of the Lina
Member and its conformable
contact observed with the
overlying Umm er Radhuma Formation limestones. The
Late Paleocene to Early Eocene age of this member finally brings proof of a major hiatus of about 10 Ma.
Attested to in the neighbouring
regions of Arabia, for
example
in the Rubal Khali basin, in Qatar and in
Version abegee
Introduction
Dans la pCninsule Arabique, le passage Cr&ac&Tertiaire
fait depuis longtemps lobjet dappreciations
contradictoires :
celui-ci serait transitionnel ou marque par un hiatus correspondant 2 une importante lacune. Si certaines regions sont
bien documentCes, montrant, g lexemple de la marge omanaise, lexistence dune continuite des dep8ts (Plate1 et al.,
1992 ; Roger et al., 19981, ou au contraire, en domaine plus
interne de la plaque arabique (Rubal Khali), celle dun hiatus (Hasson, 1985), largumentation
est en revanche moins
convaincante en Arabie Saoudite centrale et septentrionale,
bien que le passage K-T y soit diicrit comme transitionnel.
Les r&entes decouvertes de vertebr&
marins 2 lest du
Nafud dans le Nord de IArabie, dans le membre de Lina, au
sommet de la formation dAruma, qui nous amsnent ici &
reconsiderer
lsge de ces dep8ts jusque-12 repute Maastrichtien, demontrent lexistence, dans cette region, dun important hiatus 2 la limite K-T.
Le membre
de Lina
910
C. R. Acad.
Sci.
5 l?ige Maastrichtien
du
du membre
de la terre
et des plan&es
/ Earth
& Pkmefary
Sciences
1999 329,905912
Late Paleocene
to Early Eocene
marine
vertebrates
Discussion
sur l&e
des dep8ts
from
the Uppermost
Aruma
Formation
(northern
Saudi Arabia)
Implications
C&ac&Tertiaire
septentrionale
La &vision
de 1Pge du membre de Lina implique
Iexistence dun important hiatus, dune duree proche de
10 Ma, P la limite Cr&ac&Tertiaire,
en Arabie centrale et
septentrionale. Ce rCsultat est plus conforme aux donnkes
regionales, qui montrent un contraste net entre le domaine
interne de la plaque arabique et ses marges. Ainsi, en domaine interne, 5 lexemple du Rubal Khali (Hasson, 19851,
du Qatar (Sugden et Standring, 19751, de 1Oman interieur
(Hughes Clarke, 19881, du Dhofar (Roger et al., 19891, du
Yemen (Beydoun et Greenwood,
1968), comme en Arabie
centrale et septentrionale, on rel?ve partout une importante
lacune des termes inferieurs du Paleogene. Seules des conditions geodynamiques particulieres, liees ?t leffondrement des
marges de la plaque arabique, comme dans le Huqf (Plate1 et
al., 1992) ou dans les montagnes dOman (Roger et al.,
1998), favorisent lenregistrement
du passage C&a&Tertiaire sans lacune.
Acknowledgements.
This study was carried
out within the framework
of an agreement
between
the Saudi Arabian
Deputy
Ministry
for Mineral
Resources
and the French
Bureau
de recherches
g6ologiques
et mini&es.
Publication
of these results was
made
possible
thanks
to the support
and authorization
of Dr. M.A. Tawfiq (Assistant
Deputy
Ministry
for Survey
and Exploration.
Deputy
Ministry
for Mineral
Resources),
to whom
the authors
express
their grateful
thanks.
7. References
Arambourg
phosphates
Maroc,
92,
C.
(Maroc,
l-372
1952.
Les
Algerie,
Beydoun
Z.A.
and
graphique
international:
CNRS,
Paris, 128 p.
tion
El Asaad
C.M.A.
in Central
Saudi
C. R. Acad.
Sci.
1999.329,90!5-912
Proceedings
of the 1st Jordanian
1982,
Special
Publication
of
72-86
Paris,
vertebres
Tunisie),
fossiles
des gisements
Notes
et M&-m. Serv.
Greenwood
J.E.G.W.
Aden
Protectorate
1983a.
Arabia,
Sciences
Lithostratigraphy
in: Abed
A.M.
de
la terre
de
gko/.
1968.
Lexique
stratiand Dhofar,
Ill (1 Ob2),
of the Aruma
Formaand Khaled
M. (Eds.),
et des
plan&es
/ Earth
El Asaad
G.M.A.
1983b.
Aruma
Formation
in Central
Khaled
M. (Eds.), Proceedings
ference,
Amman,
1982,
Special
Association,
87-111
Geological
Jordanian
Conference,
Geologists
Amman,
Association,
El-Khayal
A.A.
1969.
Planktonic
and larger
foraminiferal
biostratigraphy
of the Uppermost
Cretaceous
and Lower
Tertiary
formations
of Eastern
and Northwestern
Saudi
Arabia,
Thesis,RutgersThe State University,
USA, 152 p.
El-Khayal
& Planetary
Sciences
A.A.
1974.
Foraminiferal
biostratigraphy
of the
Umm
H. Thomas
et al.
er Radhuma
Formation
(Paleocene-Lower
Arabia,
Faculty
of Science
Bulletin,
214
Hasson
the Saudi
correlation
335-364
Eocene)
University
P.F. 1985.
New observations
Arabian
Umm er Radhuma
with
neighboring
regions,
Hughes
Clarke
M.W.
clature
in the oil-producing
Ged.,
11 (l), 5-60
1988.
of Eastern
Saudi
of Riyadh,
6, 195-
on the biostratigraphy
Formation
(Paleogene)
Micropaleontology,
Stratigraphy
area of Interior
and
of
Roger
J., Plate1 J.-P.,
1994.
Geology
of Dhofar,
cial publication,
Sultanate
of
and its
31 (4),
Roger
J., Bourdil on
Aubry
M.-P.,
Philip
1998.
Modifications
biologiques
autour
gnes dOman,
Bull.
rock unit
nomenOman,
/. Petrol.
Sander
Paleogitne
5 (l), 3-40
Lebret
P., Halawani
M., Memesh
A., Bourdil on
C., Janjou
D., Le
Nindre
Y.-M.,
Roger J., Shorbaji
H. and Kurdi
H. 1999.
Geologic
map of the Turubah
quadrangle,
Sheet 28F, Kingdom
of Saudi
Arabia: Saudi
Arabian
Deputy
Ministry
for Mineral
Resources,
Ceologic Map CM-l
39, report
46 p.
Madden
C.T., Whitmore
Jr. F.C., Schmidt
D.L. and Naqvi
1995.
The Umm
Himar
Formation
(Paleocene)
of Saudi
Arabia
associated
strata:
statigraphy,
vertebrate
fauna,
and paleoenvironment,
US Geological
Survey
Bulletin,
2093,
l-l 9
Patterson
C. 1993.
Osteichthyes:
Teleostei,
The fossil
record
2, Chapman
& Hall, London,
in: Benton
621-656
Plate1
J.-P., Dubreuilh
J., Le Metour
J., Roger
Bechennec
F. and Berthiaux
A. 1992.
Geological
and
Madraca,
with
explanatory
notes,
Sheet
1:250
000.scale,
Ministry
of Petroleum
and Minerals,
Oman
Powers
R.W. 1968.
Lexique
Arabia
: III (1 Obl),
CNRS,
Paris,
stratigraphique
177 p.
Powers
R.W.,
Ramirez
L.F., Redmond
1966.
Geology
of the Arabian
peninsula:
Saudi
Arabia,
US Geological
Survey
147 p.
Roger
J., Plate1 J.-P.,
1989.
Donnees
nouvelles
que du Dhofar
(Sultanat
V (2), 265-277
912
Apercu
palkontologique
Seoudite
orientale,
et stratigraphique
Rev.
Micropak!ontol.,
Standring
Peninsula,
A.J. 1975.
Ill (I Ob3),
Lexique
CNRS,
du
Stratigraphic
Tulsa,
USA,
stratigraphique
Paris, 119 p.
in-
: Saudi
D.,
Brosse
J.-M.,
Breton
J.-P., Manivit
J., LeStrat
P.,
J. and Shorbadji
H. 1988.
Geologic
map of the Shaqra
sheet 25H,
Kingdom
of Saudi Arabia
(with text), Saudi
Deputy
Ministry
for Mineral
Resources,
Jeddah,
GeoMap GM-120A-C.
Vaslet
D.,
Al-Muallem
MS.,
Maddah
S.,
Brosse
J.-M.,
Fourniguet
J., Breton
J.-P. and Le Nindre
Y.M. 1991.
Geologic
map
of the Ar Riyad
quadrangle,
sheet 241, Kingdom
of Saudi
Arabia
(with
text), Saudi
Arabian
Deputy
Ministry
for Mineral
Resources,
Jeddah,
Geosciences
Map GM-l
21
Elberg
E.L. Jr.
geology
of
Paper
560-D,
Wood
R.C., Johnson-Gove
I., Gaffney
E.S. and Maley
K.F. 1996.
Evolution
and Phylogeny
of Leatherback
Turtles
(Dermochelyidae),
with Descriptions
of New Fossil Taxa, Chelonian
Conservation
and
Biology,
international
Journal
of Turtle and Tortoise
Research,
2 (2),
266-286
Cavelier
C. and Bourdillon-de-Grissac
C.
sur la stratigraphie
et Ihistoire
geologidOman),
Bull.
Sot. gkol.
France,
ser. 8,
Sci.
W. and
: Qatar
C.
spe-
C., Razin
P., Le Callonnec
L., Renard
M.,
J., Plate1 J.-P., Wyns
R. and Bonnemaison
M.
des palkoenvironnements
et des associations
de la limite
C&ace-Tertiaire
dans les montaSot. g&o/. France,
Paris, 169 (2), 255-270
N.J. 1962.
en Arabie
Sugden
ternational
I.M.
and
(Ed.),
C. R. Acad.
C. and Cavelier
and Minerals
Steineke
M., Bramkamp
R.A. and Sander
N.J. 1958.
relations
of Arabian
Jurassic
oil, AAPG
Symposium,
1294-l
329
J., Wyns
R.,
map of Duqm
NE 40-03107,
Sultanate
of
international
C.D.
and
sedimentary
Professional
M.J.
Bourdillon-de-Grissac
Ministry
of Petroleum
of Oman,
259 p.
Paris.
Sciences
de
la terre
et des
plan&tes
/ Earth
& Planetary
Sciences
1999.329,90!%912