Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Official and Formal Complaints for U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Lambert Cases 15-3400 and 16-1149 As Of February 16, 2016
1. Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group - Pennsylvania Attorney General BCP Complaint
Form re Pacer.Gov Account, February 2, 2016
2. Form for Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, U.S.C.A. Third Circuit COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL
MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY of January 25, 2016 with Act
3. Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Dispute with PACER.GOV to Epic Card SR 12933443521 February 3, 2016
4. USPS Postal Inspectors Complaint The case number for request is - HQ127159443 February 13,
2016
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1 of 1
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&sear...
16-1149 Lisa Lambert v. Superintendent Framingham MCI, et al "Clerk Order - Term (fees)"
1 message
CMECF_No_Reply@ca3.uscourts.gov <CMECF_No_Reply@ca3.uscourts.gov>
To: scaterbone@live.com
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and
parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if
receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges,
download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Notice of Docket Activity
The following transaction was filed on 02/16/2016
Case Name:
Document(s)
Docket Text:
CLERK ORDER dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the
notice of appeal. Case terminated on 02/16/2016. (CJG)
Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone
Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr.
Mr. Michael Kunz, Clerk of Court
2/16/2016 11:11 PM
consumers@attorneygeneral.gov
www.attorneygeneral.gov
1-800-441-2555 PA ONLY
1-717-787-9707
Yes
Yes
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Dr.
No
No
Under 18
18-34
35-59
60-64
65 and older
Name*
Stan J. Caterbone
Address*
Lancaster
Daytime Phone Number*
( 717
) 669-2163
717
826-5354
State*
Zip Code*
County*
PA
17603
Lancaster
Email Address
stancaterbone@gmail.com
If completing this form on behalf of someone else, please complete the following information:
Age Group:
Are they a veteran?
Yes
Yes
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Dr.
No
No
Under 18
18-34
35-59
60-64
65 and older
Name*
Address*
same as above
City*
State*
( 717
) 669-2163
717
Zip Code*
County*
Email Address
826-5354
Phone Number:
City
State
Date of Purchase
Online Accounts
Zip Code
County
Purchase Price
Legal Representation:
Have you retained an attorney?
Yes
No
Attorneys Name
Address
City
State
Zip Code
County
Other Agencies:
Have you contacted other agencies?
Yes
No
U.S. Attorney, FBI, both Harrisburg and Philadelphia, Lancaster City Police,
What action was taken?
I have been systematically locked out of the above accounts and can no longer
conduct my financial and legal affairs. The Pacer.gov account deprives me from
continuing my litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. I have electronic filing privledges
in both courts and currently have active cases, which I am litigating as a pro se
plaintiff, petitioner, and appellant. Active Cases are 14-02559, 15-03984 in the
U.S. District Court and 15-3400, 16-1001, and 16-1149 in the U.S. Third Circuit
Court of Appeals. This is a flagrant case of obstruction of justice, as well as
other civil rights violations and possibly violations of criminal statutes, including
RICO, both civil and criminal. This is a bona fide pattern of conduct in that
it has been ongoing since 1987.
I have been complaining to all law enforcement agencies of computer hacking
since June. And have been complaining since 2005 regarding the same problems
to all of the above.
Restore my online accounts and retain all histories of accounts, and provide
a secure internet connection from Comcast Cable, which may be in collusion
with the computer hackers, or maybe the computer hackers.
February 2, 2016
YOUR SIGNATURE
DATE
Please include copies of all documents regarding your problem. Be sure to send COPIES, not
originals.
www.attorneygeneral.gov
If your complaint falls with the Bureaus jurisdiction, we may attempt to initiate our voluntary
mediation process with the business, in which case you will receive a letter with your file number and
the name of the agent who will handle the mediation. Please keep your file number for future
reference when contacting this office.
NOTE: Because of the volume of complaints the Bureau receives, it may take some time before
we review and process your complaint. We ask for and appreciate your patience during this time.
NOTE: In order to document your complaint file and keep it up-to-date, we request
communications from you and the business to be in writing.
You will be notified by mail when we receive information regarding your case.
TO HELP US HELP YOU, PLEASE REFRAIN FROM CALLING FOR STATUS REPORTS.
If mediation efforts are not successful, you may be advised to seek relief either through a private attorney
or through Magisterial District Court. The Bureau cannot provide you with private legal counsel or offer
legal advice. The Bureau represents the public at large in its enforcement of the Unfair Trade Practices
and Consumer Protection Law (Consumer Protection Law). The Consumer Protection Law does
provide individual consumers with the ability to bring a private action, citing unfair and deceptive business
practices.
PROBLEM-SOLVING TIPS
It is helpful for you to try to resolve your own complaint before contacting the Bureau. However, if you
have exhausted your efforts to resolve the problem without success, contact the Office of Attorney
General promptly for assistance.
NOTE: If your claim involves a dispute of charges placed on your credit card, or billing statement or if a
merchant has promised to reverse or credit your charge card but has failed to do so, you must act quickly
to preserve your right to challenge a charge. Under the Federal Fair Credit Billing Act, your credit card
company must receive a written dispute notice from you within 60 days after the first bill containing the
disputed charge was mailed to you. The Bureau cannot dispute this charge for you. Look at the back
of your credit card statement for specific information regarding the procedure for filing your dispute. You
must file your dispute with your credit card company, a complaint to the merchant or company that made
the charge is not sufficient. Even if you file a credit card dispute, you can still file a complaint with our
office.
IDENTIFY THE PROBLEM
Before you complain to a company, be sure to identify the problem, what (if anything) you have already
done to resolve the problem and what you think is a fair settlement. For example, do you want your
money back? Would you like the product repaired? Do you want the product exchanged?
GATHER RECORDS
Start a file about your complaint. Include copies of sales receipts, repair orders, warranties, canceled
checks, and contracts which will back up your complaint and help the company solve your problem.
Go to the place you made the purchase. Contact the person who sold you the item or performed the
service. Calmly and accurately explain the problem and what action you would like taken. If that person
is not helpful, ask for the supervisor or manager and restate your case. A large percentage of consumer
problems are resolved at this level. Chances are, yours will be too.
Allow each person you contact time to resolve your problem before contacting someone else.
Keep a record of your efforts and include the names of those you spoke with and what was done about
the problem. Save copies of any letters you send to the company, as well as letters sent to you.
WRITING A COMPLAINT LETTER
The letter should include your name, address, home and work telephone numbers, and the account
number, if appropriate.
Make your letter brief and to the point. Specify all the important facts about your purchase, including the
date and place you made the purchase and any information you can give about the product, such as the
serial or model number. If you are writing to complain about a service you received, describe the service
and who performed it.
State exactly what you want done about the problem and how long you are willing to wait to resolve it.
Have reasonable expectations.
Include copies of all documents regarding your problem. Be sure to send COPIES, not originals.
Dont write an angry, sarcastic, or threatening letter. The person reading your letter probably was not
responsible for your problem, but may be very helpful in resolving it.
Type your letter if possible. If it is handwritten, make sure it is neat and easy to read.
Keep a copy of all correspondence to and from the company, as well as a copy of your complaint.
OTHER ASSISTANCE
If you are not satisfied with the response, dont give up. If the company operates nationally or the product
is a national brand, call or write a letter to the person responsible for consumer complaints at the
companys headquarters, e.g., the companys public relations representative or president. Many
companies have toll-free telephone numbers, often printed on the product. Before telephoning a
company long distance, check to see if the firm has a toll-free number.
If you have questions concerning the specific application or interpretation of the law, you should consult a
private attorney. If you do not have an attorney, you can call your county lawyer referral service or your
county bar association. Other agencies may be accessed through the blue pages of your telephone
director.
The Bureau is charged with identifying patterns of business practices which may violate the Consumer
Protection Law. Even if you have resolved your complaint, you can forward a statement regarding your
experience, with attached documents, for the Bureaus reference.
Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. We hope we can be of assistance to you.
1 of 1
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&sear...
Our investigation is now complete and we regret to inform you that the transaction has been reversed in accordance
with PayPal's Seller Protection Policy and the PayPal User Agreement, Section IV, Paragraph 3.
PayPal investigates claims of fraudulent buyers and transactions in order to protect the integrity of our payments
network. To protect yourself from fraudulent transactions, please be sure to follow the steps outlined in our Seller
Protection Policy
To learn more about PayPal's Seller Protection Policy, go to: https://www.paypal.com/us/spp
To view the PayPal User Agreement, go to: https://www.paypal.com/us/UA
If you believe this refund was made in error, you may appeal our decision using the link below:
https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?cmd=_complaint-view-details&cid=PP-004-531-254-883
Please understand that appealing the decision for this Buyer Complaint case will not guarantee a reversal of the
decision.
Sincerely,
Protection Services Department
Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. For assistance,
log in to your PayPal account and click the Help link in the top right corner of any PayPal page.
PPID PP655 - 583adf6d33a6f
2/2/2016 2:32 PM
Gmail - Second Request for Information About Buyer Complaint: Case ...
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&cat...
----------------------------------Transaction Details
-----------------------------------
----------------------------------What to Do Next
-----------------------------------
----------------------------------Due Dates
----------------------------------Provide additional information within 10 calendar days from the date this
case was filed.
-----------------------------------
1 of 3
2/2/2016 2:39 PM
Gmail - Second Request for Information About Buyer Complaint: Case ...
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&cat...
Other Details
----------------------------------To review the PayPal User Agreement, visit the PayPal site and click the
"Legal Agreements" link on the bottom of any page.
Thank you for your patience and cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
PayPal
Protection Services Department
Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you
will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account
and click the Help link in the top right corner of any PayPal page.
BC:PP-004-531-254-883:R2:USD135.00:1/20/2016:0NA8928719672163X
2 of 3
2/2/2016 2:39 PM
Gmail - Second Request for Information About Buyer Complaint: Case ...
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&cat...
3 of 3
2/2/2016 2:39 PM
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
February 1, 2016
Advanced Media Group Version - In A Killers Words Lisa Michelle Lambert, Nearly 25
Years Since Laurie Shows Murder,
Lambert Claims Innocence In New Book, January 31, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. January 31, 2016 - Lancaster Newspapers Sunday Edition Headlines "In a
killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie Shows
murder, claims innocence in new book"
2. September 2, 2015 - Lambert MOTION to File SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by Movant
Case No. 5-14-cv-02259 September 2, 2015 signed for LNP
3. September 15, 2015 - United States District Court Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus
ORDER Summary Judgement DENIED Case No 5-14-cv-02559-PD September 15,
2015
4. November 29, 2016 - 14-02259 Lambert Habeus MOTION to Recuse Judge Paul
Diamond November 29, 2015
5. September 15, 2015 - United States District Court Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus
ORDER Summary Judgement DENIED Case No 5-14-cv-02559-PD September 15,
2015
6. December 31, 2015 - Recorded 15-3400 Third Circuit Court of Appeals LETTER to
Clerk of Court re RESCIND Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice, December 31, 2
7. January 12, 2016 - 15-3400 Lambert Third Circuit Court of Appeals Lambert
Appeal ORDER GRANTING Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice January 12,
2016
8. January 15, 2016 - Recorded Third Circuit 15-3400 Lambert Appeal MOTION
FOR THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS JUDGE MICHAEL FISHER TO RECUSE
January 15, 2016
9. Form for Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, U.S.C.A. Third Circuit COMPLAINT OF
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY of January 25, 2016 with Act
10. Brief Statement of Facts
11. EXHIBITS
12. Open Letter to the Editor re Kathleen Kane and Good Old Boys Network January
24, 2016
13. November 13, 2015 Letter From Attorney General Kathleen Kane re "Good Old
Boys"
14. December 14, 2015 Motion to Dismiss Case No. 15-3400
15. November 12, 2015 Letter to Attorney General Kathleen Kane re "Good Old
Boys' and the NSA
16. Article by Bill Keisling re "Palace coup: What the Kathleen Kane Prosecution is
Really About"
17. January 25, 2015 DOCKET for US District Court Case No. 14-02559
18. Advanced Media Group Press Release re Stalking Legislation December 17,
2015
19. Receipts Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, U.S.C.A. Third Circuit COMPLAINT OF
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY of January 25, 2016
20. November 12, 2015 Letter to Kathleen Kane re Good Old Boys
21. November 13, 2015 - Letter From Kathleen Kane re Good Old Boys
22. December 14, 2015 - Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal MOTION TO DISMISS
December 14, 2015
23. December 9, 2015 - KEISLING - Palace coup - what the Kathleen Kane
prosecution is really about December 9, 2015
24. January 25, 2016 - Woes across government branches tarnish Pa.'s image,
experts say, by Brad Bumstead January 25, 2016
25. Letter from Pennsylvania Representative Mike Sturla re Organized Stalking Bill
of June 8, 2009
26.
27.
Executive Summary
28.
29.
30.
31.
Family History
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Redacted Version
38.
39.
40.
41.
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page 1 of 151
143
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page 2 of 151
143
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page 3 of 151
143
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page 4 of 151
143
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page 5 of 151
143
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page 6 of 151
143
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page 7 of 151
143
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page 8 of 151
143
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page 9 of 151
143
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page 10 of 151
143
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
February 3, 2016
ACTIVE COURT CASES
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 074474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 052288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 0603349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 1610157
Epic Card
P.O. Box 245998
San Antonio,TX 78224
____________/S/_______________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Page
Page
Page111ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
consumers@attorneygeneral.gov
www.attorneygeneral.gov
1-800-441-2555 PA ONLY
1-717-787-9707
Yes
Yes
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Dr.
No
No
Under 18
18-34
35-59
60-64
65 and older
Name*
Stan J. Caterbone
Address*
Lancaster
Daytime Phone Number*
( 717
) 669-2163
717
826-5354
State*
Zip Code*
County*
PA
17603
Lancaster
Email Address
stancaterbone@gmail.com
If completing this form on behalf of someone else, please complete the following information:
Age Group:
Are they a veteran?
Yes
Yes
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Dr.
No
No
Under 18
18-34
35-59
60-64
65 and older
Name*
Address*
same as above
City*
State*
( 717
) 669-2163
717
Zip Code*
County*
Email Address
826-5354
Phone Number:
City
State
Date of Purchase
Online Accounts
Page
Page
Page222ofof
of59
56
59
Zip Code
County
Purchase Price
February 3, 2016
Legal Representation:
Have you retained an attorney?
Yes
No
Attorneys Name
Address
City
State
Zip Code
County
Other Agencies:
Have you contacted other agencies?
Yes
No
U.S. Attorney, FBI, both Harrisburg and Philadelphia, Lancaster City Police,
What action was taken?
I have been systematically locked out of the above accounts and can no longer
conduct my financial and legal affairs. The Pacer.gov account deprives me from
continuing my litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. I have electronic filing privledges
in both courts and currently have active cases, which I am litigating as a pro se
plaintiff, petitioner, and appellant. Active Cases are 14-02559, 15-03984 in the
U.S. District Court and 15-3400, 16-1001, and 16-1149 in the U.S. Third Circuit
Court of Appeals. This is a flagrant case of obstruction of justice, as well as
other civil rights violations and possibly violations of criminal statutes, including
RICO, both civil and criminal. This is a bona fide pattern of conduct in that
it has been ongoing since 1987.
I have been complaining to all law enforcement agencies of computer hacking
since June. And have been complaining since 2005 regarding the same problems
to all
the above.
Epic Credit
Obstruction
Card
of of
Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page333ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Restore my online accounts and retain all histories of accounts, and provide
a secure internet connection from Comcast Cable, which may be in collusion
with the computer hackers, or maybe the computer hackers.
February 2, 2016
YOUR SIGNATURE
DATE
Please include copies of all documents regarding your problem. Be sure to send COPIES, not
originals.
Page
Page
Page444ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
consumers@attorneygeneral.gov
www.attorneygeneral.gov
1-800-441-2555 PA ONLY
1-717-787-9707
If your complaint falls with the Bureaus jurisdiction, we may attempt to initiate our voluntary
mediation process with the business, in which case you will receive a letter with your file number and
the name of the agent who will handle the mediation. Please keep your file number for future
reference when contacting this office.
NOTE: Because of the volume of complaints the Bureau receives, it may take some time before
we review and process your complaint. We ask for and appreciate your patience during this time.
NOTE: In order to document your complaint file and keep it up-to-date, we request
communications from you and the business to be in writing.
You will be notified by mail when we receive information regarding your case.
TO HELP US HELP YOU, PLEASE REFRAIN FROM CALLING FOR STATUS REPORTS.
If mediation efforts are not successful, you may be advised to seek relief either through a private attorney
or through Magisterial District Court. The Bureau cannot provide you with private legal counsel or offer
legal advice. The Bureau represents the public at large in its enforcement of the Unfair Trade Practices
and Consumer Protection Law (Consumer Protection Law). The Consumer Protection Law does
provide individual consumers with the ability to bring a private action, citing unfair and deceptive business
practices.
PROBLEM-SOLVING TIPS
It is helpful for you to try to resolve your own complaint before contacting the Bureau. However, if you
have exhausted your efforts to resolve the problem without success, contact the Office of Attorney
General promptly for assistance.
NOTE: If your claim involves a dispute of charges placed on your credit card, or billing statement or if a
merchant has promised to reverse or credit your charge card but has failed to do so, you must act quickly
to preserve your right to challenge a charge. Under the Federal Fair Credit Billing Act, your credit card
company must receive a written dispute notice from you within 60 days after the first bill containing the
disputed charge was mailed to you. The Bureau cannot dispute this charge for you. Look at the back
of your credit card statement for specific information regarding the procedure for filing your dispute. You
must file your dispute with your credit card company, a complaint to the merchant or company that made
Page
Page
Page555ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
the charge is not sufficient. Even if you file a credit card dispute, you can still file a complaint with our
office.
IDENTIFY THE PROBLEM
Before you complain to a company, be sure to identify the problem, what (if anything) you have already
done to resolve the problem and what you think is a fair settlement. For example, do you want your
money back? Would you like the product repaired? Do you want the product exchanged?
GATHER RECORDS
Start a file about your complaint. Include copies of sales receipts, repair orders, warranties, canceled
checks, and contracts which will back up your complaint and help the company solve your problem.
Go to the place you made the purchase. Contact the person who sold you the item or performed the
service. Calmly and accurately explain the problem and what action you would like taken. If that person
is not helpful, ask for the supervisor or manager and restate your case. A large percentage of consumer
problems are resolved at this level. Chances are, yours will be too.
Allow each person you contact time to resolve your problem before contacting someone else.
Keep a record of your efforts and include the names of those you spoke with and what was done about
the problem. Save copies of any letters you send to the company, as well as letters sent to you.
WRITING A COMPLAINT LETTER
The letter should include your name, address, home and work telephone numbers, and the account
number, if appropriate.
Make your letter brief and to the point. Specify all the important facts about your purchase, including the
date and place you made the purchase and any information you can give about the product, such as the
serial or model number. If you are writing to complain about a service you received, describe the service
and who performed it.
State exactly what you want done about the problem and how long you are willing to wait to resolve it.
Have reasonable expectations.
Include copies of all documents regarding your problem. Be sure to send COPIES, not originals.
Dont write an angry, sarcastic, or threatening letter. The person reading your letter probably was not
responsible for your problem, but may be very helpful in resolving it.
Type your letter if possible. If it is handwritten, make sure it is neat and easy to read.
Keep a copy of all correspondence to and from the company, as well as a copy of your complaint.
OTHER ASSISTANCE
If you are not satisfied with the response, dont give up. If the company operates nationally or the product
is a national brand, call or write a letter to the person responsible for consumer complaints at the
companys headquarters, e.g., the companys public relations representative or president. Many
companies have toll-free telephone numbers, often printed on the product. Before telephoning a
company long distance, check to see if the firm has a toll-free number.
If you have questions concerning the specific application or interpretation of the law, you should consult a
private attorney. If you do not have an attorney, you can call your county lawyer referral service or your
county bar association. Other agencies may be accessed through the blue pages of your telephone
director.
The Bureau is charged with identifying patterns of business practices which may violate the Consumer
Protection Law. Even if you have resolved your complaint, you can forward a statement regarding your
experience, with attached documents, for the Bureaus reference.
Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. We hope we can be of assistance to you.
Page
Page
Page666ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
1 of 1
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&sear...
Our investigation is now complete and we regret to inform you that the transaction has been reversed in accordance
with PayPal's Seller Protection Policy and the PayPal User Agreement, Section IV, Paragraph 3.
PayPal investigates claims of fraudulent buyers and transactions in order to protect the integrity of our payments
network. To protect yourself from fraudulent transactions, please be sure to follow the steps outlined in our Seller
Protection Policy
To learn more about PayPal's Seller Protection Policy, go to: https://www.paypal.com/us/spp
To view the PayPal User Agreement, go to: https://www.paypal.com/us/UA
If you believe this refund was made in error, you may appeal our decision using the link below:
https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?cmd=_complaint-view-details&cid=PP-004-531-254-883
Please understand that appealing the decision for this Buyer Complaint case will not guarantee a reversal of the
decision.
Sincerely,
Protection Services Department
Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. For assistance,
log in to your PayPal account and click the Help link in the top right corner of any PayPal page.
PPID PP655 - 583adf6d33a6f
Page
Page
Page777ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
2/2/2016 2:32 PM
Gmail - Second Request for Information About Buyer Complaint: Case ...
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&cat...
----------------------------------Transaction Details
-----------------------------------
----------------------------------What to Do Next
-----------------------------------
----------------------------------Due Dates
----------------------------------Provide additional information within 10 calendar days from the date this
case was filed.
-----------------------------------
Page
Page
Page888ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
2/2/2016 2:39 PM
Gmail - Second Request for Information About Buyer Complaint: Case ...
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&cat...
Other Details
----------------------------------To review the PayPal User Agreement, visit the PayPal site and click the
"Legal Agreements" link on the bottom of any page.
Thank you for your patience and cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
PayPal
Protection Services Department
Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you
will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account
and click the Help link in the top right corner of any PayPal page.
BC:PP-004-531-254-883:R2:USD135.00:1/20/2016:0NA8928719672163X
Page
Page
Page999ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
2/2/2016 2:39 PM
Gmail - Second Request for Information About Buyer Complaint: Case ...
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&cat...
Page
Page
Page10
10
10ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
2/2/2016 2:39 PM
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
February 1, 2016
Advanced Media Group Version - In A Killers Words Lisa Michelle Lambert, Nearly 25
Years Since Laurie Shows Murder,
Lambert Claims Innocence In New Book, January 31, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. January 31, 2016 - Lancaster Newspapers Sunday Edition Headlines "In a
killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie Shows
murder, claims innocence in new book"
2. September 2, 2015 - Lambert MOTION to File SUMMARY JUDGEMENT by Movant
Case No. 5-14-cv-02259 September 2, 2015 signed for LNP
3. September 15, 2015 - United States District Court Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus
ORDER Summary Judgement DENIED Case No 5-14-cv-02559-PD September 15,
2015
4. November 29, 2016 - 14-02259 Lambert Habeus MOTION to Recuse Judge Paul
Diamond November 29, 2015
5. September 15, 2015 - United States District Court Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus
ORDER Summary Judgement DENIED Case No 5-14-cv-02559-PD September 15,
2015
Page
Page
Page11
11
11ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
6. December 31, 2015 - Recorded 15-3400 Third Circuit Court of Appeals LETTER to
Clerk of Court re RESCIND Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice, December 31, 2
7. January 12, 2016 - 15-3400 Lambert Third Circuit Court of Appeals Lambert
Appeal ORDER GRANTING Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice January 12,
2016
8. January 15, 2016 - Recorded Third Circuit 15-3400 Lambert Appeal MOTION
FOR THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS JUDGE MICHAEL FISHER TO RECUSE
January 15, 2016
9. Form for Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, U.S.C.A. Third Circuit COMPLAINT OF
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY of January 25, 2016 with Act
10. Brief Statement of Facts
11. EXHIBITS
12. Open Letter to the Editor re Kathleen Kane and Good Old Boys Network January
24, 2016
13. November 13, 2015 Letter From Attorney General Kathleen Kane re "Good Old
Boys"
14. December 14, 2015 Motion to Dismiss Case No. 15-3400
15. November 12, 2015 Letter to Attorney General Kathleen Kane re "Good Old
Boys' and the NSA
16. Article by Bill Keisling re "Palace coup: What the Kathleen Kane Prosecution is
Really About"
17. January 25, 2015 DOCKET for US District Court Case No. 14-02559
18. Advanced Media Group Press Release re Stalking Legislation December 17,
2015
19. Receipts Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, U.S.C.A. Third Circuit COMPLAINT OF
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY of January 25, 2016
20. November 12, 2015 Letter to Kathleen Kane re Good Old Boys
21. November 13, 2015 - Letter From Kathleen Kane re Good Old Boys
22. December 14, 2015 - Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal MOTION TO DISMISS
December 14, 2015
23. December 9, 2015 - KEISLING - Palace coup - what the Kathleen Kane
prosecution is really about December 9, 2015
Page
Page
Page12
12
12ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
24. January 25, 2016 - Woes across government branches tarnish Pa.'s image,
experts say, by Brad Bumstead January 25, 2016
25. Letter from Pennsylvania Representative Mike Sturla re Organized Stalking Bill
of June 8, 2009
26.
27.
Executive Summary
28.
29.
30.
31.
Family History
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Redacted Version
38.
39.
40.
41.
Page
Page
Page13
13
13ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
LNP Credit
Epic
Obstruction
Lisa Michelle
Card
of Justice
Complaint
Lambert
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
New Book
Book
Rebuttal
Case
Case
Case
1 of 11
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page
Page
Page14
114
14
ofofof
143
151
of59
56
59
January
February31,
3, 2016
1/31/2016 9:25 PM
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
LNP Credit
Epic
Obstruction
Lisa Michelle
Card
of Justice
Complaint
Lambert
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
New Book
Book
Rebuttal
Case
Case
Case
2 of 11
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page
Page
Page15
215
15
ofofof
143
151
of59
56
59
January
February31,
3, 2016
1/31/2016 9:25 PM
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
LNP Credit
Epic
Obstruction
Lisa Michelle
Card
of Justice
Complaint
Lambert
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
New Book
Book
Rebuttal
Case
Case
Case
3 of 11
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page
Page
Page16
316
16
ofofof
143
151
of59
56
59
January
February31,
3, 2016
1/31/2016 9:25 PM
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
LNP Credit
Epic
Obstruction
Lisa Michelle
Card
of Justice
Complaint
Lambert
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
New Book
Book
Rebuttal
Case
Case
Case
4 of 11
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page
Page
Page17
417
17
ofofof
143
151
of59
56
59
January
February31,
3, 2016
1/31/2016 9:25 PM
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
LNP Credit
Epic
Obstruction
Lisa Michelle
Card
of Justice
Complaint
Lambert
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
New Book
Book
Rebuttal
Case
Case
Case
5 of 11
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page
Page
Page18
518
18
ofofof
143
151
of59
56
59
January
February31,
3, 2016
1/31/2016 9:25 PM
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
LNP Credit
Epic
Obstruction
Lisa Michelle
Card
of Justice
Complaint
Lambert
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
New Book
Book
Rebuttal
Case
Case
Case
6 of 11
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page
Page
Page19
619
19
ofofof
143
151
of59
56
59
January
February31,
3, 2016
1/31/2016 9:25 PM
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
LNP Credit
Epic
Obstruction
Lisa Michelle
Card
of Justice
Complaint
Lambert
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
New Book
Book
Rebuttal
Case
Case
Case
7 of 11
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page
Page
Page20
720
20
ofofof
143
151
of59
56
59
January
February31,
3, 2016
1/31/2016 9:25 PM
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
LNP Credit
Epic
Obstruction
Lisa Michelle
Card
of Justice
Complaint
Lambert
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
New Book
Book
Rebuttal
Case
Case
Case
8 of 11
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page
Page
Page21
821
21
ofofof
143
151
of59
56
59
January
February31,
3, 2016
1/31/2016 9:25 PM
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
LNP Credit
Epic
Obstruction
Lisa Michelle
Card
of Justice
Complaint
Lambert
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
New Book
Book
Rebuttal
Case
Case
Case
9 of 11
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page
Page
Page22
922
22
ofofof
143
151
of59
56
59
January
February31,
3, 2016
1/31/2016 9:25 PM
In a killers words: Lisa Michelle Lambert, nearly 25 years since Laurie ...
LNP Credit
Epic
Obstruction
Lisa Michelle
Card
of Justice
Complaint
Lambert
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
New Book
Book
Rebuttal
Case
Case
Case
10 of 11
http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/in-a-killer-s-words-lisa-michelle-l...
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
23
23
23
of
ofof
of
143
151
59
56
59
January
February31,
3, 2016
1/31/2016 9:25 PM
Stan J. Caterbone
MOVANT
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
717-459-7588 Fax
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
September 21, 2015
BREAKING NEWS
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Releases Stan J. Caterbone's International
Signal & Control or ISC Whistleblowing History and Mind Control Relationships
Document of September 21, 2015. This is an all-inclusive document that provides
the evidence beyond a preponderance of doubt to prove the following (download in
pdf format on scribd for bookmarks). Turn to the ISC Timeline of Events and the
Lancaster Newspapers ISC Archives for a synopsis of events. The following is
proven:
The 29 False Arrests and Prosecutorial Misconduct that Stan J. Caterbone was
subject to in 1987 through 2015 was an effort to cover-up the allegations
made by Stan J. Caterbone in the Spring and Summer of 1987 after the
Meeting of June 23, 1987 with ISC and United Chem Con Executive Larry
Resch.
The ISC Fraud and Sales of Arms to Iraq Story by the ABC News Nightline
with Ted Koppel and the Financial Times of London in May, July, and
September of 1991 was most likely initiated by Lancaster Newspapers
reporter Thomas Flannary.
The ISC merger was not completed until December of 1987, 3 months after
the False Arrests of Stan J. Caterbone.
In the months after the June 23, 1987 meeting with ISC Executive Larry
Resch Stan J. Caterbone had personally solicited a vast array of local, state,
and federal officials, including the FBI and Congressman Robert Walker, PA
State Representative Gibson Armstrong for assistance in the retaliation and
slander campaign that was in progress.
Stan Credit
Epic
Obstruction
J. Caterbone,
Card
of Justice
Complaint
ISC-AA
and
Landmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
the CIACase
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page
Page
1 of
24
124
24
31
ofofof
of
199
59
56
59
Monday, September
February21,
3, 2015
2016
Page 2
There is credible linkage between the ISC Scandal, U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control, Stan J. Caterbone's family VICTIMIZATION of the same, and the
participation of LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.
The Zook Murder Appeal proves that Lancaster County Detective Michael
Landis, Judge James Cullen, and Judge Farina of the Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas were all involved in U.S. Sponsored Mind Control before
2004 and before Stan J. Caterbone went public with his VICTIMIZATION of
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former director of the National Security Agency (NSA) was
on the Board of Directors of ISC and was involved in U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control Technologies through his company S.A.I.C. Corporation. Bobby Ray
Inman would later be selected by Former President Bill Clinton for his Director
of Defense, but would later remove himself due to allegations and public
scrutiny for his role in the ISC scandal.
In the Fall of 1991 Robert Gates was nominated for Director of the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) and during his televised confirmation hearings the
was subject to brutal array of questions concerning his participation in the ISC
scandal. He went on to be nominated and later would serve both the Bush
Administrations and the Obama Administrations as Secretary of Defense until
resigning in 2011.
The above finding of facts and evidence corroborates a vast conspiracy and
criminal enterprise that violates both civil and criminal RICO statutes and
antitrust statutes.
The above would constitute treble damages for Stan J. Caterbone and
Advanced Media Group in U.S. District Courts, specifically in the Eastern
District for Pennsylvania Case No. 05-2288, 06-4650, 14-02559, and other
related cases; and Case No. 08-13373 in the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
Stan Credit
Epic
Obstruction
J. Caterbone,
Card
of Justice
Complaint
ISC-AA
and
Landmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
the CIACase
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page
Page
2 of
25
225
25
31
ofofof
of
199
59
56
59
Monday, September
February21,
3, 2015
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 1
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
(717) 826-5354
(717) 669-2163 text or call
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
January 19, 2016
U.S. Attorney
Zane David Memeger
U.S. Attorney's Office
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Re:
Civil Rights Complaint of Hate Crime; Discrimination; Official Misconduct; and Interference
with Right to Vote, Obstruction of Justice, Obstruction of Due Process, Abuse of Service
Current Federal Court Case Numbers: U.S.C.A. 15-3400, 16-1001, E.D.O.P. 14-02559, 1503984, Superior Court of Pennsylvania 1561 MDA 2015, 1915 MDA 2015, Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas CI-15-10167, CI-08-13373, CI-06-03349
Page 1
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page26
26
26ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 2
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
(717) 826-5354
(717) 669-2163 text or call
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
January 19, 2016
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Criminal Section, PHB
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 514-3204
(202) 514-8336 - FAX
Re:
Civil Rights Complaint of Hate Crime; Discrimination; Official Misconduct; and Interference
with Right to Vote, Obstruction of Justice, Obstruction of Due Process, Abuse of Service
Current Federal Court Case Numbers: U.S.C.A. 15-3400, 16-1001, E.D.O.P. 14-02559, 1503984, Superior Court of Pennsylvania 1561 MDA 2015, 1915 MDA 2015, Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas CI-15-10167, CI-08-13373, CI-06-03349
Page 1
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page27
27
27ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 3
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
done anything to set these circumstances in motion but to be right regarding International Signal &
Control back in 1987; as well as many other proclamations and forecasts. That being said, it is also
widely reported that many Targeted Individuals and Victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control are
lead to death and/or suicide. The Lancaster Community-At-Large is guilty of creating; abetting;
fostering; and executing this tragedy. The fact that local; state; and federal law enforcement
induce and encourage this environment of hate is landmark.
I am alleging you have jurisdiction to investigate according to the following statutes:
HATE CRIMES (18 U.S.C. 241, 18 U.S.C. 245 and 42 U.S.C. 3631) -- Violent and
intimidating acts of racial, ethnic and religious hatred that interfere with federally protected rights,
such as housing, employment, voting, and public services.
OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT (18 U.S.C. 241, 18 U.S.C. 242) -- Intentional acts by law
enforcement officials who misuse their positions to unlawfully deprive individuals of constitutional
rights, such as the right to be free from unwarranted assaults, illegal arrests and searches, and
theft of property.
INTERFERENCE WITH THE RIGHT TO VOTE (18 U.S.C. 241, 18 U.S.C. 242, 18 U.S.C.
245, 18 U.S.C. 594 and 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-10(1)) -- Voter intimidation or voter suppression
schemes that target victims on the basis of race, color, national origin, or religion.
The complaints are contained in PART I and PART II of the Preliminary Emergency Injunction For
Relief.
10 USC 921, Article 121 -- Larceny and wrongful appropriation
10 USC 920A, Article 120a -- Stalking
18 2340 USC -- Torture
18 USC 241 -- Conspiracy against rights of sovereign, free, God created, spirit and soul
beings
18 USC 213 -- Illegal Surreptitious entry
18 USC 242 -- Deprivation of rights under color of law
18 USC 35 -- Imparting or conveying false information
18 USC 1117 -- Conspiracy to Murder
18 USC 1111 -- Murder
18 USC 1905 -- Disclosure of information generally
42 USC 1983 -- Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 USC 1985 -- Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
31 USC 5328 -- Whistleblower protections
18 USC 1512 -- Engaging in misleading conduct
18 USC 1503 -- Intimidating a witness/victim
18 USC 1512 -- Tampering with a witness/victim
18 USC 1513 -- Retaliation against a witness/victim
18 USC 1510 -- Obstructing a criminal investigation, conflict of interest roles in
government
18 USC 1509 -- Impeding due exercise of rights by attempting to prevent, obstruct,
impede and Interfere with same
Page 2
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page28
28
28ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 4
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
Page 3
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page29
29
29ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 5
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
Page 4
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page30
30
30ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 6
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
differently because of race, color, national origin, sex, or religion. The misconduct covered by Title
VI and the OJP (Office of Justice Programs) Program Statute includes, for example, harassment or
use of racial slurs, unjustified arrests, discriminatory traffic stops, coercive sexual conduct,
retaliation for filing a complaint with DOJ or participating in the investigation, use of excessive
force, or refusal by the agency to respond to complaints alleging discriminatory treatment by its
officers.
What remedies are available under these laws?
DOJ may seek changes in the policies and procedures of the agency to remedy violations of these
laws and, if appropriate, also seek individual remedial relief for the victim(s). Individuals also have
a private right of action under Title VI and under the OJP Program Statute; in other words, you
may file a lawsuit yourself under these laws. However, you must first exhaust your administrative
remedies by filing a complaint with DOJ if you wish to file in Federal Court under the OJP Program
Statute.
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 prohibit discrimination against
individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability. (42 U.S.C. 12131, et seq. and 29 U.S.C.
794). These laws protect all people with disabilities in the United States. An individual is considered
to have a "disability" if he or she has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one
or more major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an
impairment. The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all State and local
government programs, services, and activities regardless of whether they receive DOJ financial
assistance; it also protects people who are discriminated against because of their association with a
person with a disability. Section 504 prohibits discrimination by State and local law enforcement
agencies that receive financial assistance from DOJ. Section 504 also prohibits discrimination in
programs and activities conducted by Federal agencies, including law enforcement agencies. These
laws prohibit discriminatory treatment, including misconduct, on the basis of disability in virtually
all law enforcement services and activities. These activities include, among others, interrogating
witnesses, providing emergency services, enforcing laws, addressing citizen complaints, and
arresting, booking, and holding suspects. These laws also prohibit retaliation for filing a complaint
with DOJ or participating in the investigation.
What remedies are available under these laws?
If appropriate, DOJ may seek individual relief for the victim(s), in addition to changes in
the policies and procedures of the law enforcement agency. Individuals have a private
right of action under both the ADA and Section 504; you may file a private lawsuit for
violations of these statutes. There is no requirement that you exhaust your
administrative remedies by filing a complaint with DOJ first.
Page 5
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page31
31
31ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 7
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
I, Stanley J. Caterbone, Targeted Individual or TI, residing at: 1250 Fremont Street,
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603, do hereby state that I am at least 18 years of age, that I am a
citizen or a legal resident of the United States of America, that I am of sound mind, and that I am
the person whose signature follows on this Affidavit. The purpose of this document is (1) to advise
Congress as well as state and local officials of organized stalking and electronic and mind
manipulation torture being committed against me and (2) to request a state, local, or
Congressional investigation and hearing on the use of remotely-operated directed energy attacks
and mind control technologies on Americans in this country.
Our Government is responsible for protecting its citizens from elements that
covertly harass, torment, murder, and cause victims to commit suicide through
organized stalking and remote electronic torture. Yet, unbiased research indicates that
certain elements of Government either engage in these activities or protect those who perform
them. I seek the complete dismantling of any officially-sanctioned covert Government torture
programs, the passage of legislation specifically outlawing that high-tech torture, and the full
prosecution of any person, regardless of his rank or position, who has violated my civil rights and
my most basic human rights. The assaults on my mind and body have been occurring for 24
year(s) and include, but are not limited to the following victimization's:
Bombarding
my body with debilitating electronic and mind manipulation effects. Directed Energy
Weapons Causing Severe Pain to Body and Brain. Began in at least 2005 and still continuing,
with complaints to Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance, FFCHS in 2009, and in cited
in various state and federal court cases over the past several years.
Attacks causing severe
artificial pain most likely from Directed Energy Devices synchronized with telepathic harassment
and organized stalking and harassment have been logged and reported to law enforcement and
medical professionals since 2008.
Prior to 2008 the attacks were experienced and reported to
medical professionals but the sources were not known. Also reported attacks of pain to a family
physician, emergency room personnel and psychiatrists.
2.Invading my thoughts via remote sensing technologies. Was sent an autonomous email in
1998 introducing the term remote viewing. Various technologies and tactics are being used to
create emotional signatures that induce various emotional states; a systematic complete hacking
of my mind.
3.Making me mentally hear others' voices through the microwave hearing effect.
Synthetic and/or Mental Telepathy. First started to experience telepathy/synthetic telepathy in
2005 with full-time 24/7 connection during the same time to present. When full-time telepathy
started a male conducted interrogations lasting several hours at a time concerning a wealth of
subjects including ISC/CIA Knowledge. Cannot disconnect from continuous conversations at all
times with one female person. The handlers know everything I know and experience in real time.
During 2006 and 2007 have been telepathic with some 10 or more persons, both male and female
for short durations. Can recall most conversations and subject matter with identities of who they
said they were. Interrogation type harassment is still being used telepathically to harass and for
some sleep deprivation. Made first complaints to DARPA, the FBI, and U.S. Senator Arlen Specter
in 2007. Some conversations by the persons that are telepathic with me elude to some program
similar to the DARPA datalog program where they record your entire life. Everything that you try
Page 6
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page32
32
32ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 8
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
to do on a daily basis is subject matter for conversation and harassment. Interference with
thought, harassment, and interrogation is used often times with electromagnetic weapon attacks to
the brain or body.
6.Having me stalked en masse on foot and in vehicles. vandalizing my home and/or car.
Gang Stalking or Organized Stalking began in 1987 and continues today. It includes strangers
using gestures such as finger under eye; various forms of harassment; and public mobbing.
Complaints have been filed in 1987; 1992;1998 and 2005 to 2010. Complaints were made to
various public officials and local, state, and federal agencies as mental duress. The terms
organized stalking, gang stalking, targeted individual, etc., was not learned until a few years ago.
The organized stalking and harassment followed in several states, some while traveling from
Lancaster, Pennsylvania to California. Tracking technologies may have been used and most likely
are still being used. Police were involved in most places.
8.Blacklisting me in the labor market. Filed complains of employment discrimination with the
Pennsylvania Attorney General in 2006 and the Lancaster County Human Relations Commission in
2008.
9.Workplace mobbing. Experienced in 1987 at Financial Management Group, Ltd., American Helix
of High Industries in 1991 and Pflumm Contractors, Inc., in 1997/1998. Filed complaints and logs
as mental duress and harassment. Was forced out of all 3 organizations as a result of the mobbing
and harassment.
Page 7
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page33
33
33ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 9
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
10.Public Mobbing. Public type mobbing and organized stalking and harassment was perpetrated
heavily in the years 2005 to 2010 in the following places: The Lancaster County Courthouse, The
Lancaster County Public Library, the Pennsylvania Career Link, and the Millersville University
Library and University Offices. I was given suspicious and illegal No Trespass Notices in some 18
public places in Lancaster County in the years 2005 to 2009 without just cause. I was complaining
of stalking and harassing in most all of those public places. The Lancaster County Public Library
and the Millersville University took away my access to a computer after my personal computers
were vandalized and/or hacked inoperable. Fulton Bank took away my safe deposit box. Others
included my church of worship, various bars and restaurants and one attorneys office. Complaints
have been filed regarding the same in courts and with various authorities.
11.Attempted Murder. Experienced with an attempt of vehicular homicide in 1991 after National
News Media reported ISC/CIA-NSA connection of Arms to Irag. The incident involved a vehicle
changing lanes and direction and heading directly toward me in the wrong direction running me off
the road, narrowly missing a tree. I Filed the incident in federal courts and used as a motion to
seal federal case no. 05-2288 in 2005 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
12.Pet Killing. Cat was killed in 2005 with complaints to the Lancaster County Humane Shelter
and the Southern Regional Police Department.
13.Illegal Entries of Home/Properties. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then again in
1991; 1997-1998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance claims,
most with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania , State Farm and
Harleysville Insurance Companies.
14.Illegal Repossessions. Airplane in 1987 containing legal and business files. Home/Property
and Contents in 2006 also containing legal and business files and documents.
15.Physical Assaults. One attack and filed complaint with police report in Los Osos California in
2005 and one in the City of Lancaster. Police reports were filed and obtained for both.
16.False Arrests. Experienced 7 in 1987 and more than 20 in 2005 and 2006 in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. The false arrests were
charges that were all dismissed prior to court hearings.
17.False Imprisonments. Spent 7 to 10 days in Lancaster County Prison in 1987 with all charges
dismissed and again for some 60 days in 2006 with all charges dismissed. The 60 Days of
imprisonment of 2006 was triggered with a false report of missing a bail supervision meeting,
which was confirmed to be false in court; however bail was maliciously and purposefully reinstated
as secured instead of unsecured. The appropriate appeal was filed which secured my release after
some 60 days of false imprisonment. There were no charges that resulted in any convictions.
Page
Page
Page34
34
34ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 10
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
19.Vandalism to Property. First in 1987 in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, then again in 1991; 19971998; and most serious in 2005 to 2010. Filed Police Reports and insurance claims, most with the
Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga, Pennsylvania and Harleysville Insurance
Company. 3 computers have been rendered inoperable since 2005 along with various electronics
equipment; dvd recorders; printers; household items; appliances; etc., Most insurance claims
have been paid. In the past years a wave of purchased items, online and in stores, were received
broken or the wrong item and all had to be returned. Some included items to secure my property,
and others included computer related items, others were household and clothing items.
20.Gas Lighting. The illegal entering of home and causing psychological duress by moving items
and or hiding items. First reported in 1998 to the Conestoga Police and continued to present.
Clothing was also manipulated and altered. The term gas lighting was only learned in 2010,
although it was reported to police as harassment by neighbors of friends. The daily draining of my
hot tub was also used as a psychological warfare tactic and used to run up utility bills. Numerous
complaints were made to police in 2008 to 2010.
22.Vandalism to Car/Truck.
23.Toxic Chemical Causing Running Nose. Experienced on regular basis in 2009 when in public
places. Was not in conjunction with cold/flu symptoms.
organized stalking.
24.Computer Hacking. Computer Hacking complaints were filed to local authorities in the County
of Lancaster and the Cyber Crime unit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2005 to 2010.
Numerous complaint numbers have been secured. Complaints of cell phone hacking was also
reported in 2010. Websites and blogs were regularly hacked and sometimes taken off-line.
Electronic calenders, court documents, and financial records were often hacked causing many
problems of the years, including having to withdraw civil complaints.
25.Cyber Stalking. Most in 2005 to 2010. Complaints to Microsoft legal counsel, Yahoo Message
Board, and the FBI Cyber Crime Unit.
Page 9
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page35
35
35ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 11
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
29.Forced Hospitalizations. Forced Hospitalizations in 1987 (2) one for 6 hours and one for 5
days; 2006 one for 3 days; 2009 one for several hours while in intensive care for emergency
surgery; and 2010 one for 8 days. Filed complaints to Citizens Commission for Human Rights in
1991 and 2008.
30.Manipulation and Theft of Documents. Numerous thefts and manipulation of all legal and
business documents both in paper and in electronic format have occurred since 1987.
Microfiche/Microfilming began in 1987 and other measures to secure documents have been ongoing
to present. Numerous complaints have been filed with law enforcement since 1987.
Statement: I have been a Targeted Individual, TI, and Victim since 1987. In 1987 I blew the
whistle (public Allegations and Complaints to State and Federal Authorities of Fraud during merger
negotiations with British Defense Contractor Ferranti International) on an international defense
contractor named International Signal & Control, or ISC, who was selling arms (Everything from
Telemetry Systems to Cluster Bombs) to Iraq via South Africa and was convicted of a $1 Billion
dollar Fraud in 1992 by the United States Attorney and several other federal agencies. See
ABC/News 20/20 and Nightline in 1991. They were founded and headquartered in my hometown of
Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I was a shareholder and was solicited by a top ISC Executives (Convicted
as a Mastermind of the Billion Dollar Fraud) to help finance some of their operations through an
affiliate called United Chem Con.
ISC was a Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States
Intelligence Agencies since it's beginnings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was
Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland. Former Secretary of
the Navy, Bobby Ray Inman was on the Board of Directors of ISC and was also on the Board of
Directors of Science Applications International Corporation, or SAIC. SAIC was a huge defense
contractor that was the recipient of the Defense Intelligence Agency, or DIA, program on Remote
Viewing, which SAIC named Project Stargate. It was reported that Bobby Ray Inman declined the
nomination for Secretary of Defense under the first Clinton Administration because of the ISC and
Trecor scandals. In the early 1990's I was a subcontractor on a project for the Defense Advanced
Research Project Agency, or DARPA, with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or
NIST called TIMIT. The project developed speech corpora for the development of computer based
speech recognition systems. I was also involved in the bidding of other Department of Defense
contracts dealing with information technologies. In 1998 I was stalked and approached by an
employee of the National Security Agency, or NSA in York, Pennsylvania who said my problems
were not with the NSA, but the good ole boys. In 2005 I was detained by 2 Defense Intelligence
Agency, or DIA officers in a museum on a military base in Austin, Texas and was questioned and
interviewed regarding my civil actions filed in federal court for several hours. I was released and
told to stay off of all military bases. My brother, a Family Physician in Austin Texas had to verify
my travel plans and the fact that I was staying with him prior to my release.
My father alleged he was part of U.S. Navy experiments in the 1940's and experienced
synthetic telepathy in the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's as outlined in memos and documents he had
authored; and from my personal conversations with him prior to his death. Ms. Amy Fuchs of the
Disclosure Project confirmed that he was most likely given an ET experience via synthetic
telepathy. He died in 2001 in New York City of cancer. My brother was in the U.S. Air Force in the
late 1960's and I allege was a victim of the LSD experiments relating to MKULTRA in the late
Page 10
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page36
36
36ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 12
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
1960's and a victim of murder (Suspicious Suicide with tainted medical reports) in Santa Barbara
California in 1984; Notarized Complaints were filed to the California Attorney General in 1991. He
made a declaration type statement prior to his death that he got bad LSD while in the U.S. Air
Force.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. As far back as the late 1980's I thought that my mind was being read, or "remotely
viewed". During the times that legal Counsel and attorneys were solicited in 1987, 1991, and 1997
Organized Stalking and Harassment and other forms of attacks experienced by Targeted
Individuals were severely increased. In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an allout assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of
directed energy devices and/or electromagnetic weapons. This assault was no coincidence in that
it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, of CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest. From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz. The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion. By the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and
coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group. And Again, the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office. Since August 1, 2015
the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer hacking. On
at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to be
granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of. The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct
witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle
Lambert. In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate
murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free
Page 11
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page37
37
37ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 13
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated Petition
for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in the
Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia. However, this time there was no MANDATORY
Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. So Stan J.
Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a desperate
attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in the
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far as to
undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions of West
Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
The Complaint contained
allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.
The Lancaster City Police
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the fabricated
302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on August 8 th .
The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis. The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45
audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone. In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family. Phil interviewed all living
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control. This targeting has
ruined every aspect of my life.
Page 12
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page38
38
38ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 14
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
Some Perspectives
The calculated and technological entry into another persons mind is an act of monumental barbarism which obliterates perhaps with the twiddling of a dial the history
and civilization of mans mental development. It is more than an abuse of human rights,
it is the destruction of meaning. For anyone who is forced into the hell of living with an
unseen mental rapist, the effort to stay sane is beyond the scope of tolerable endurance.
The imaginative capacity of the ordinary mind cannot encompass the horror of it. We
have attempted to come to terms with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration
camps. We now have the prospect of systematic control authorized by men who issue instructions through satellite communications for the destruction of societies while they
are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going to the opera. FROM On the Need for
New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology"by Carole Smith
Global Research, October 18, 2007; Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003. People have
no comprehension of how lethal only one aspect (aside from the obvious of driving the victim completely insane) of telepathy technology can be in disrupting and ruining an individual's life through
the sabotaging of his/her daily activities. Everything an individual does begins with a momentary
thought. From the split second that thought is learned by the person on the other end (telepathi cally) - the individual's right to privacy is not the real threat or loss. The real lethal weapon is the
advantage in disrupting or preventing the individual from accomplishing whatever he/she is going
to do before they actually do it. With a simple cell phone call or instant message, the Advanced
Team is in place to subvert; sabotage; manipulate; propagandize; smear; disrupt; or even prevent the task or activity from being accomplished in any successful manner. The perps are skilled
at creating scenarios that are covertly arranged to simulate everyday occurrences to make the victim at fault for the loss or failure. Imagine the consequences when these activities have legal and
financial implications. With telepathy technology the need for tracking and surveillance technology
is greatly diminished and may even become obsolete. This is not merely Mind Invasive Technology, as Carole Smith so eloquently wrote this is LIFE Invasive Technology. Say Goodbye to
any true sense of capitalism and free enterprise in the not to distant future unless of course
someone stops these illegal and disastrous technology transfers and leaks.
Stan J. Caterbone
Organized or Gang Stalking
A system of organized psychological terror tactics used against a person who has become an enemy of an individual or a government. Subtle but effective techniques of stalking by multiple individuals and psychological intimidation and manipulation are used to slowly but surely drive the target to make complaints to authorities who will see the complaints as bogus because of the methods
used against the target. As a result, the target gets labeled as mentally ill.
There are as many stalking tactics as there are targets as the multistalkers will tailor the stalking
to the individuals habits and individual personality. Some common examples or organized stalking
are: following the target on foot, by car and public transportation, crowding the target's space in a
public place, murmuring insults under the breath so only the target can hear, sitting in the car out side the target's residence, starting "fights" in public with the target, doing "skits" on the street
which involves information only the target should know but has been found out via surveillance of
the target, stealing and vandalism of the target's possessions.
Page 13
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page39
39
39ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 15
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
/S/
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Page 14
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page40
40
40ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 16
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
Criminal Section
Overview
HISTORY
One of the oldest of the Civil Rights Division's units, the Criminal Section enforces laws that date to
the post Civil War Reconstruction Era. Originally a part of the Criminal Division, the Criminal
Section and its enforcement authority was moved to the Civil Rights Division when the CRD was
created in 1957. In the early years, the Division was organized geographically. Eventually, as more
civil rights laws were passed, the Division reorganized into functional subject areas. The Criminal
Section is unique within the Division, prosecuting criminal cases while the remainder of the Division
handles civil matters.
Some of the Criminal Section's earliest prosecutions involved the murder of minorities and civil
rights workers in the South during the 1960's prior to desegregation. In 1968 Congress broadened
the scope of protection afforded by civil rights statutes by passing a law that made it a crime to
interfere by force or threat of force with certain rights (such as employment, housing, use of public
facilities, etc.) because of someone's race, religion, color or national origin. Those protections were
increased even further twenty years later when Congress enacted a law (amended in 1996) making
violent conduct against religious property and those exercising their religious beliefs a federal
crime. Congress also made it a federal crime in 1994 to use violence to interfere with providers of
reproductive health care. The cases handled by the Section have always been of great interest to
the public and have sometimes become the subject of films, documentaries, books, and television
programs.
Some of the historically significant events in which the Criminal Section has been directly involved
include investigations of the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Medgar Evers, the fatal
shootings by the National Guard at Kent State University, the deaths of three civil rights workers
(Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner) in Mississippi, and the police beating of Rodney King in Los
Angeles.
MISSION
The Criminal Section prosecutes cases involving the violent interference with liberties and rights
defined in the Constitution or federal law. The rights of both citizens and non-citizens are
protected. In general, it is the use of force, threats, or intimidation that characterize a federal
criminal violation of an individual's civil rights. Our cases often involve incidents that are invariably
of intense public interest. While some violations may most appropriately be pursued by the federal
Government, others can be addressed by either the federal Government or by state or local
prosecutors. Our ultimate goal is to ensure that acts constituting federal criminal civil rights
violations are sufficiently remedied, whether prosecuted federally or by local authorities.
The types of acts that may involve violations of federal criminal civil rights laws are:
HATE CRIMES (18 U.S.C. 241, 18 U.S.C. 245 and 42 U.S.C. 3631) -- Violent and
intimidating acts of racial, ethnic and religious hatred that interfere with federally protected rights,
such as housing, employment, voting, and public services.
OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT (18 U.S.C. 241, 18 U.S.C. 242) -- Intentional acts by law
enforcement officials who misuse their positions to unlawfully deprive individuals of constitutional
rights, such as the right to be free from unwarranted assaults, illegal arrests and searches, and
theft of property.
HUMAN TRAFFICKING (18 U.S.C. 1581-1594) Use of force or threats of force or other forms of
coercion to compel labor or services, including commercial sex acts, from victims. Modern day
slavery can involve migrant farm laborers, sweat shop workers, domestic servants, and brothel
workers. Victims may be U.S. citizens or aliens, or adults or children.
Page 15
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page41
41
41ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 17
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
INTERFERENCE WITH ACCESS TO REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE (18 U.S.C. 248) -Violence directed at abortion clinics or health care providers, such as doctors or nurses.
INTERFERENCE WITH THE EXERCISE OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS and DESTRUCTION OF
RELIGIOUS PROPERTY (18 U.S.C. 247) -- Violent conduct targeting religious houses of
worship, usually involving the arson of churches or synagogues.
INTERFERENCE WITH THE RIGHT TO VOTE (18 U.S.C. 241, 18 U.S.C. 242, 18 U.S.C.
245, 18 U.S.C. 594 and 42 U.S.C. 1973gg-10(1)) -- Voter intimidation or voter suppression
schemes that target victims on the basis of race, color, national origin, or religion.
The punishment imposed by these statutes generally depends upon the injury suffered by the
victim. The more serious the injury, the more severe the penalty. In some cases, where the victim
had died as a result of the defendant's conduct, the death penalty applies.
WHAT WE DO
Every year the Criminal Section receives and reviews several thousand complaints from citizens,
law enforcement agencies, and organizations describing possible violations of the federal criminal
civil rights statutes. These complaints may be received directly by the Criminal Section in the form
of letters and phone calls or by referral from federal investigative agencies, such as FBI, OIG, BOP,
and the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development. The majority of complaints allege misconduct by
law enforcement officers such as state or local police officers, federal law enforcement officers,
prison superintendents, correctional officers, state and county judges, or other public officials.
There are five general stages in bringing potential criminal civil rights violations to prosecution. In
sequence, they are:
1. receipt of complaint
2. investigation
3. grand jury
4. indictment
5. trial
Each complaint received is analyzed to decide whether an investigation is appropriate.
If an investigation is recommended, the FBI (the primary investigative agency) conducts the
investigation by interviewing witnesses and collecting evidence and sends its report both to the
responsible attorney within the Section, as well as to the U.S. Attorney's office with responsibility
for federal prosecutions within the geographic area where the incident occurred. When the
investigation is completed, the prosecutors must then decide whether there is sufficient evidence to
prove a federal violation and legal authority to pursue the case in federal court. Evidence
considered may include statements from witnesses and victims, medical records, physical evidence,
and official records documenting the incident. [Note: the federal criminal civil rights laws have a
five year statute of limitations from the date of the incident, except in cases involving an
intentional killing (generally not bound by the statute of limitations) and religious interference
incidents (seven year statute of limitations)].
In order to prosecute a felony case where the defendant could face imprisonment of more than a
year, evidence must first be presented to a grand jury, which then votes on whether an indictment
should be returned. If an indictment is returned, the Criminal Section often prosecutes the case
jointly with the local U.S. Attorney in the federal District where the incident occurred. There are
times when the Section or the U.S. Attorney may decide to prosecute the case without direct
involvement by the other office. The Criminal Section also prosecutes juvenile offenders, who may
be involved in hate crimes such as cross burnings and vandalism of homes or churches.
Page 16
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page42
42
42ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112182116
Page: 18
United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Complaint, January 19, 2016
In the areas of police misconduct, housing rights, and access to health care, the Criminal Section
may refer complaints that do not present a criminal violation to other Sections within the Civil
Rights Division that have authority under separate civil statutes to file suit when a pattern of abuse
is discovered.
While not all complaints received result in investigation, nor all investigations lead to a grand jury
or eventual prosecution, the Criminal Section seeks to review all possible violations to ensure that
individual liberties are protected. Often, local authorities will take the lead in prosecuting violent
conduct under state statutes even though such conduct also constitutes a violation of federal
criminal civil rights laws. In such cases, the local prosecutive effort is presumed to vindicate federal
interests.
Infrequently, however, even if there has been a local prosecution, it may be determined (often with
the support of the local authorities) that a subsequent federal prosecution is necessary to remedy
the criminal wrongdoing. The Supreme Court has upheld this "dual prosecution" policy as not
violating the Constitution's double jeopardy clause, since the federal Government is a separate
sovereign from the state, charging a crime under its unique authority, even though the case may
be based on the same incident.
In addition to prosecuting cases, the Criminal Section actively participates in providing technical
assistance and information to the public, law enforcement and other Government agencies
regarding the federal criminal civil rights laws by attending conferences, providing training, and
making recommendations for legislation to further the protection of individual rights and liberties.
WHO WE ARE
Prosecutors, paralegals, and other support staff work together in reviewing complaints and bringing
investigations to prosecution. Our attorneys come from diverse backgrounds, and many have prior
experience as litigators -- either as prosecutors or as public defenders -- at the federal, state, or
local level.
In addition, the Criminal Section works with numerous organizations, both within and outside the
Department of Justice, which provide additional investigative resources and substantive expertise
related to federal criminal civil rights violations and other related, potential federal crimes or civil
violations.
Page 17
Epic Credit Card
Obstruction
of Justice
Complaint
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page43
43
43ofof
of59
56
59
February 3, 2016
Third
Judicial Council of the _________________
Circuit
Name of Complainant:
Contact Address:
( 717 )
Daytime telephone:
2.
Name(s) of Judge(s):
Court:
3.
669-2163
Does this complaint concern the behavior of the judge(s) in a particular lawsuit or
lawsuits?
[ X ] Yes
[ ] No
If yes, give the following information about each lawsuit:
Court:
Case Number:
15-3400; 16-1149
Circuit: ___________________
[ x ] Lawyer
Pro Se
] Neither
Page 1 of 2
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
Complaint
Misconduct
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page44
44
44
1 of
of
of
of59
13
56
59
Sunday, January
February24,
3, 2016
If you are (were) a party and have (had) a lawyer, give the lawyers name, address, and
telephone number:
Same As Above
4.
] Yes
[ X ] No
Court to which any appeal has been taken in the lawsuit against the judge:
Docket number of the appeal:
Present status of the appeal:
5.
Brief Statement of Facts. Attach a brief statement of the specific facts on which the
claim of judicial misconduct or disability is based. Include what happened, when and
where it happened, and any information that would help an investigator check the facts.
If the complaint alleges judicial disability, also include any additional facts that form the
basis of that allegation.
6.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the statements made in this complaint are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge.
(Signature)__________________________________
(Date)__________________
Page 2 of 2
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
Complaint
Misconduct
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page45
45
45
2 of
of
of
of59
13
56
59
Sunday, January
February24,
3, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
1. 15-3400, Third Circuit Court of Appeals, November 24, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone
FILED a Motion for a 30 Day Extension of Time.
2. Order granted.
3. 15-3400, December 14, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone FILED a LETTER to the Clerk
requesting to WITHDRAW appeal no. 15-3400 in the Third Circuit.
4. 15-3400, December 17, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone FILED a LETTER to the Clerk
CLARIFYING the Withdraw as a MOTION to WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
5. 15-3400, December 31, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone FILED a LETTER to the COURT
RESCINDING his MOTION TO WITHDRAW.1
The Letter to Rescind was either hidden from FISHER, JORDAN and VANASKIE or FISHER, JORDAN and
VANASKIE ignored the Letter to Rescind. This would have preserved the entire Record of Case No. 153400 including EXHIBITS, MOTIONS, ETC.,.
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
Complaint
Misconduct
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page46
46
46
3 of
of
of
of59
13
56
59
Sunday, January
February24,
3, 2016
6. 15-3400, January 12, 2016 FISHER, JORDAN and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges, ISSUED
AN ORDER in Case No. 15-3400 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED.2
7. 15-3400, January 13, 2016 Stanley J. Caterbone FILED a MOTION TO REINSTATE the
Appeal in the Third Circuit.
8. 15-3400, January 15, 2016 (FISHER, JORDAN and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges ISSUED
AN ORDER DENIED MOTION TO REINSTATE the Appeal in the Third Circuit.
9. 15-3400, January 15, 2016 Stanley J. Caterbone FILED a MOTION TO RECUSE Third
Circuit Judge Michael Fisher for Conflict of Interest in the Lisa Michelle Lambert Case due to
a conflict of interest since Michael Fisher was acting Attorney General of Pennsylvania and
Superior to Christy Fawcett who PROSECUTED Lisa Michelle Lambert's PRCA Hearing before
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Lawrence Stengel in 1998.
10. U.S District Court, 14-02559, January 17, 2015 in the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Case No. 14-02559 Stanley J. Caterbone FILED a
NOTICE OF APPEAL.
11. U.S District Court, 14-02559, January 17, 2015 in the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Case No. 14-02559 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 25
Notice of Appeal : (jpd, ) (Entered: 01/20/2016)
12.15-3400, January 12, 2016 FISHER, JORDAN and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges, ISSUED
AN ORDER in Case No. 15-3400 DISMISS MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE FISHER as
moot due to ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW.3
13. 16-1149, January 22, 2016 in the U.S. THIRD CIRCUIT Clerk Issues New Docket
No. 16-1149
2 This DELETED AND REMOVED FROM THE PUBLIC DOMAIN and from DELIBERATIONS the entire the Record
of Case No. 15-3400 including EXHIBITS, MOTIONS, ETC., which SUPPORTS AND PROVIDES EVIDENCE
FOR AFFIRMATION OF THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT in Case No. 14-02559 and a FAVORABLE
Ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals for the Complainant, and Pro Se Appellant.
3 This ORDER was a Complete and Total Disregard to the Law and Highly prejudicial.
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
Complaint
Misconduct
-AALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page47
47
47
4 of
of
of
of59
13
56
59
Sunday, January
February24,
3, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Newslanc.com
Open Letter to the Editor
Dear Newslanc,
The following is a letter to the editor which I wish to be published on your site.
I have been the victim of a widespread civil and criminal conspiracy that dates
back to 1987, made up of the very same actors that Kathleen Kane is up against, the
"good old boys". In 1987 I blew the whistle on a local company, International Signal
& Control, or ISC, that was indicted for selling arms and weapons to Iraq via South
Africa with the aid and support of the CIA and the NSA. It was the 3rd largest white
collar crime at that time, valued at $1 Billion Dollars. I was the victim of a
widespread wholesale cover-up through an elaborate slander campaign that included
29 false arrests, multiple false imprisonments, and a fabricated mental illness record
that to this day is still resonating.
Kathleen Kane must be commended for her courage and her determination for
taking on this culture of arrogance and total disregard for the U.S. Constitution and
the rule of law that they so emphatically espouse to uphold. They believe and
conduct their affairs in a manner that suggests they are above the law and we, the
Pennsylvania taxpayers, are beneath the law. The sad fact that it reaches into the
judiciary and law enforcement agencies is undeniably the most outrageous and
deplorable truth to this scandal. Case in point, until yesterday I was the APPELLANT
in a case before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals that involves the Habeus
Corpus for convicted and imprisoned Lisa Michelle Lambert. A murder case in the
early 1990's that was made famous when in 1997 U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell
found her actually innocent due to "one of the worst cases of prosecutorial
misconduct in the English speaking language" and released her from prison. The case
drew nationwide attention when then Pennsylvania Attorney General, then Mike
Fischer, enlisted the help of 9 other state attorney generals to curtail the reach of
the federal bench in state matters concerning Habeus Corpus cases. To make
matters worst, 38,000 Lancastrians signed petitions to remove the Honorable
Stewart Dalzell from the federal bench.
Newslanc
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditLetter
ofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
to
Complaint
theMisconduct
-AEditor
ALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
48
48
148
51of
of
of
of
of59
613
956
59
Wednesday,
Tuesday,
Sunday,
December
January
February24,
15,
20,
3, 2016
2015
Mike Fisher and company won and Lisa Michelle Lambert was back in prison
within 9 months while the case went back to the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas. The Honorable Judge Lawrence Stengel held a bench hearing where she was
again found guilty and sentenced to life in prison. The case was covered by the LA
Times in a multi-part Sunday series, A&E producer Bill Curtis did a 48 Hours special,
and Lifetime Movies made it into a prime time movie.
This year, these "Good Old Boys" made it so difficult for me to litigate my
efforts to free Lisa Michelle Lambert, that I had to dismiss my appeal and effectively
withdraw as her MOVANT and Advocate. I was trying to persuade the courts that my
own demise was the result of the same type of wholesale prosecutorial misconduct
by some of the very same principals that Lisa Michelle Lambert fell victim to. My
efforts were so distasteful to the powers to be that her court appointed attorney
threatened me with criminal prosecution for no other reason than I might actually be
successful in helping her win the Habeus Corpus she filed in May of 2014. I allege
the U.S. District Judge was trying in vain to invalidate and derail my own federal
court cases that seek to restore me to whole from a life of ruin, misery, torture, and
financial collapse.
For the record, I founded a financial firm in the 1980's that reached 5 states
and raised some 90 million dollars in a matter of 9 months. In the late 1980's and
early 1990's I was one of 5 domestic companies that had the capabilities of
manufacturing CDROM's that included a client list that reached across the globe and
included government agencies and fortune 500 companies. And in 1987, myself and
a genius recording engineer named Tony Bongiovi and his famous recording studio,
Power Station Studios of New York, were developing and producing the first "digital
movie". The intellectual property rights and the RICO statutes that apply to my legal
claims in federal courts were too much for the "Good Old Boys" to handle.
I think I'll sit this one out and watch Kathleen Kane advocate by proxy.
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Newslanc
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditLetter
ofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
to
Complaint
theMisconduct
-AEditor
ALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
49
49
249
62of
of
of
of
of59
613
956
59
Wednesday,
Tuesday,
Sunday,
December
January
February24,
15,
20,
3, 2016
2015
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Stan J. Caterbone
Newslanc
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditLetter
ofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
to
Complaint
theMisconduct
-AEditor
ALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
50
50
350
73of
of
of
of
of59
613
956
59
Wednesday,
Tuesday,
Sunday,
December
January
February24,
15,
20,
3, 2016
2015
Newslanc
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditLetter
ofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
to
Complaint
theMisconduct
-AEditor
ALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
51
51
451
84of
of
of
of
of59
613
956
59
Wednesday,
Tuesday,
Sunday,
December
January
February24,
15,
20,
3, 2016
2015
Newslanc
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditLetter
ofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
to
Complaint
theMisconduct
-AEditor
ALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
52
52
552
95of
of
of
of
of59
613
956
59
Wednesday,
Tuesday,
Sunday,
December
January
February24,
15,
20,
3, 2016
2015
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112153497
Page: 1
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Stanley J. Caterbone, APPELLANT, Pro Se
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lisa Michelle Lambert
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
Lynn Bissonnette, et al.,
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
Stanley J. Caterbone
:
APPELLANT
:
MOTION TO DISMISS
_______________________________________________________________________
I hereby on this 14th day of December, 2015, I Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing pro se, as
the APPELLANT do hereby file a Motion to Dismiss the above captioned appeal for reasons previously
affirmed in previous filings.
Newslanc
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditLetter
ofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
to
Complaint
theMisconduct
-AEditor
ALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
53
10
53
653
6of
of
of
of59
6956
13
59
Wednesday,
Tuesday,
Sunday,
December
January
February24,
15,
20,
3, 2016
2015
KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ...
1 of 3
December 9, 2015
http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...
Breaking: Kanes staff has approved one of two contracts needed to hire a special prosecutor to investigate the porno email
scandal
by Bill Keisling
Have Republicans in the top levels of Pennsylvania government and courts engineered a takeover of the Democraticcontrolled state attorney generals office?
Has this high-level palace coup taken place under everyones noses?
Are the criminal charges brought by Republican officials against AG Kane, her subsequent
law license suspension, and efforts by the state senate to remove her from office all simply
a ruse meant to distract voters from what is really going on: an attempt by Republicans to
control policy in the attorney generals office, and throughout state government, without
having won an election?
Recent developments in all three branches of Pennsylvania government make these
reasonable questions.
Several weeks ago, on November 18, four high-level staffers from the AGs office testified
before the state senate committee exploring AG Kanes removal from office that theyve
been running nearly all the offices legal functions since Kane could no longer practice law.
First Deputy Attorney General Bruce Beemer, and three executive deputy attorneys general
Robert Mulle, James Donahue, and Lawrence Cherba testified they have effectively
Kathleen Kane
taken control of the elective attorney generals office following Kanes unprecedented law
license suspension.
First Deputy AG Beemer is a holdover from the days when Republican Attorney General Tom Corbett ran the office, before
Kanes election in 2012.
When she came into office Kane probably thought Beemer was a nice guy, and a competent and experienced career
prosecutors, who should be kept around.
But did Attorney General Kane make a mistake not having her own loyalists in these top positions?
Several weeks back, Beemer and the other three made a splash at
the senate impeachment committee when they spoke about the
importance of the many criminal cases the office was responsible
for handling.
But criminal cases prosecuted by the AGs office are, from a public
policy perspective, small potatoes.
The state AGs office is a johnny-come-lately in criminal
prosecutions. Before the office became an elective one in 1980, the
AGs office seldom if ever prosecuted criminals. (Criminal
prosecutions, before 1980, were referred to local DAs.)
Newslanc
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditLetter
ofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
to
Complaint
theMisconduct
-AEditor
ALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Four guys running the AG's office: who voted for them?
Page
Page
Page
Page
54
11
54
54
7of
of
of
of59
956
13
59
Wednesday,
Sunday, January
February24,
20,
3, 2016
1/20/2016 5:25 AM
KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ...
2 of 3
http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...
For centuries, the most important job of the Pennsylvania attorney general has been to issue opinions on the legality or
constitutionality of state actions or programs.
Opinions issued by the Attorney General can and do concern the nuts and bolts of how state agencies are run from the
legality of programs, to who is hired, to how paper clips are bought, to the treatment and execution of prisoners.
Legal opinions of the attorney general carry the full force of law, until and unless a court overturns them.
Beemer and his three associates, testifying before the state senate, played down these important constitutional
responsibilities. These days, Beemer said, the AGs office rarely if ever issues important opinions on government or interagency matters.
Two recent and important issues demanding high-level decisions in the AGs office clearly demonstrate this is not true.
The first issue is a constitutional matter: the state senate is set to vote on whether to hold a hearing to remove Kane from
office, bypassing the constitutional impeachment process. Its the historic role of the attorney generals office to intervene on
questions of the legality of removing an official from office.
The second issue is a personnel, or contract, matter: The contract for Kanes choice of the special prosecutor to investigate
the court pornography email scandal must be reviewed and approved by her office.
AG Kane selected Douglas Gansler, a former Maryland attorney general, and his Washington DC-based law firm, to review
the hundreds of thousands of emails Kane found on her office servers.
But contracts hiring Gansler and his firm must be approved and signed by the attorney generals office staff.
The responsibility to review and approve Ganslers contract fell to one of the four AG office employees who testified several
weeks ago before the state senate panel to remove Kane: Robert Mulle, the executive deputy attorney general of the civil
law division.
Two employment contracts, one involving Gansler and the other his firm, landed on Deputy AG Mulles desk last week. Mulle
evidentially at first objected to the form and content of the special prosecutor agreements.
Kanes spokesman, Chuck Ardo, tells me, (Deputy AG) Mulle was able to work with Kane to massage the first of the two
contracts, about the firm.
That first contract has been signed, Ardo says. But Ganslers personal contract has yet to be approved, or signed.
They are still working on Ganslers contract, Ardo says. But she certainly got the first part approved.
Needless to say, the last thing state Republicans want is an unfettered special prosecutor looking into hundreds of
thousands of correspondence found on the AGs email servers.
Likewise, the attorney generals office must soon respond to the senates demand for a hearing to remove Kane from office.
Those running Kanes office apparently dont seem to be in any hurry, or think its their job, to weigh in on the constitutionality
of the senates proposed action.
But, it should go without saying, if a Democrat-controlled senate were to try removing a Republican attorney general in this
matter, the court papers already would be flying.
Likewise, if the porno email scandal involved mostly Democrats, instead of mostly Republican prosecutors and judges, a
special prosecutor would likely already be on the job.
So Kane finds herself having difficulties directing her own staff to work on these two important matters.
Three million Pennsylvania voters elected Kane. Voters didnt elect her staff members.
Newslanc
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditLetter
ofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
to
Complaint
theMisconduct
-AEditor
ALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
Page
Page
Page
Page
55
12
55
55
8of
of
of
of59
956
13
59
Wednesday,
Sunday, January
February24,
20,
3, 2016
1/20/2016 5:25 AM
KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ...
3 of 3
Newslanc
Complaint
Epic
Obstruction
CreditLetter
ofCard
ofJudicial
Justice
to
Complaint
theMisconduct
-AEditor
ALandmark
LANDMARK
Landmark
Case
Case
Case
http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...
Page
Page
Page
Page
56
13
56
56
9of
of
of
of59
956
13
59
Wednesday,
Sunday, January
February24,
20,
3, 2016
1/20/2016 5:25 AM
Woes across government branches tarnish Pa.'s image, experts say | TribLIVEhttp://triblive.com/state/pennsylvania/9844432-74/state-political-budget?...
1 of 3
Page
Page5757ofof5959
February 3, 2016
2/3/2016 9:02 AM
Woes across government branches tarnish Pa.'s image, experts say | TribLIVEhttp://triblive.com/state/pennsylvania/9844432-74/state-political-budget?...
2 of 3
Page
Page5858ofof5959
February 3, 2016
2/3/2016 9:02 AM
Woes across government branches tarnish Pa.'s image, experts say | TribLIVEhttp://triblive.com/state/pennsylvania/9844432-74/state-political-budget?...
3 of 3
Page
Page5959ofof5959
February 3, 2016
2/3/2016 9:02 AM
USPS FAQ
https://prd2faq.usps.com/faq/iq/usps/request.do?create=kb:USPSFAQ&...
Review Email
Please review the request before submitting.
Request Type
[edit]
InquiryType Problem
Category Receiving Mail
Topic No Delivery/No Attempt > I Did Not Receive a Specific Item
Additional Detail:
Sender Unknown
*Sender's address: First Name: Clerk of Court
Middle
Initial:
Last Name: U.S. Third Circuit
Street: 601 Market Street
City: Philadelphia
State: PA
ZIPcode: 19106
Urbanization:
Company: U.S Clerk of Court for the Third Circuit
USPS also
has Carrier
Route:
*Recipient's address: First Name: Stan
Middle J.
Initial:
Last Name: Caterbone
Street: 1250 Fremont Street
City: Lancaster
State: PA
ZIPcode: 17603
Urbanization:
Company: Advanced Media Group
USPS also
has Carrier
Route:
Confirmation or N/A
Tracking
Number:
Type of Mail Letter
Piece:
What Was the First Class
Class of Mail:
1 of 3
2/13/2016 8:40 PM
USPS FAQ
https://prd2faq.usps.com/faq/iq/usps/request.do?create=kb:USPSFAQ&...
Contact Information:
[edit]
First Name Stan
Middle Initial J.
Last Name Caterbone
Company Name
Address 1 1250 Fremont Street
Address 2
City Lancaster
State PA
Urbanization
ZIP Code 17603
2 of 3
2/13/2016 8:40 PM
USPS FAQ
https://prd2faq.usps.com/faq/iq/usps/request.do?create=kb:USPSFAQ&...
Phone 717-669-2163
Email stancaterbone@gmail.com
Preferred email
response
method
3 of 3
2/13/2016 8:40 PM