Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Metal Forming Technology
Nearly 60 years ago, Swift presented four main classes of individual involved in the area of
metal forming. They included the skilled artisan, engineer, metallurgist, and mathematician. The
basis for the artisans craft lay in the experience gained from an observation of what happened,
whereas the scientific understanding of the mathematician, metallurgist, and engineer provided a
means of understanding. The difference between the mathematician, metallurgist, and engineer in
terms of perspective and approach to the common problem of metal forming is illustrated.
The tools available to engineers, scientists, and artisans have developed extensively over the
intervening years. There are notable examples of researchers who have the breadth of vision to
cross the divides between the disciplines in an effort to solve larger problems, only to find
limited industrial application of their work through an understandable industrial focus on money.
Perhaps one of the biggest problems today is not within the scientific disciplines mentioned, but
rather the final application where the artisans intuition still holds sway, because it is perceived to
be less costly. With the reduction of skilled artisans, the introduction of new materials, reduced
time to market, and the need to continually develop more efficient production methods, there is
an ever increasing need to embed this intuition within the processes [1].
1.1.1
Improvements in current forming processes and the development of new more flexible forming
processes are dependent upon the understanding of material characteristics. Current test methods,
both mechanical and physical, have provided a disjointed set of material information, though
more comprehensive data sets are becoming available. The increasingly complex mathematical
model developed to describe the behavior of these materials is not widely adopted within the
metal forming industries. The most commonly used model within finite element codes still
remains Hills quadratic model [1].
A more flexible version of Hills model was developed by Leacock without increasing the
quantity of test data required. This new yield model represents the first pragmatic development
Department of Mechanical Engineering, R.V.C.E
Page 1
Page 2
Current finite element analysis packages offer the capability to design and develop the tooling
and process parameters in a virtual environment. Most of these codes are well developed, with
the option for user additions where required. Optimization methods are also well established with
the inclusion of material and process variability now a reality.
Essential to the design and development of more intelligent metal forming machine is the
inclusion of a closed loop control system within the modeling environment. The viability of this
method has already been shown for the roll bending process, but current analyses are typically
limited to the determination of optimized machine control with a fixed set of process parameters.
A new paradigm in metal forming machine design and development can be realized through the
provision of a virtual test bed. The user interfaces in finite element codes can be used to modify
the control curves based on the kinematics of selected model parameters. The control can be
achieved either through specific subroutines linked to the solver or communicated to an external
program that will be used in the final machine control system. It now becomes possible not only
to assess a fixed set of kinematics, but also to adjust the controlling curves based on the
feedback from virtual sensors. Extensive testing of new machine configurations, sensor type
and locations, blanks, and control algorithms then becomes relatively inexpensive. Such an
approach will form the basis for the development of the next generation of metal forming
processes.
1.1.3
Page 3
Page 4
Progressive stamping is a metal working method that can encompass punching, coining, bending
and several other ways of modifying metal raw material, combined with an automatic feeding
system. The feeding system pushes a strip of metal (as it unrolls from a coil) through all of the
stations of a progressive stamping die. Each station performs one or more operations until a
finished part is made. The final station is a cutoff operation, which separates the finished part
from the carrying web. The carrying web, along with metal that is punched away in previous
operations, is treated as scrap metal. Both are cut away, knocked down (or out of the dies) and
then ejected from the die set, and in mass production are often transferred to scrap bins via
underground scrap material conveyor belts.
The progressive stamping die is placed into a reciprocating stamping press. As the press moves
up, the top die moves with it, which allows the material to feed. When the press moves down, the
die closes and performs the stamping operation. With each stroke of the press, a completed part
is removed from the die. Since additional work is done in each "station" of the die, it is important
that the strip be advanced very precisely so that it aligns within a few thousandths of an inch as it
moves from station to station. Bullet shaped or conical "pilots" enter previously pierced round
holes in the strip to assure this alignment since the feeding mechanism usually cannot provide
the necessary precision in feed length. The dies are usually made of tool steel to withstand the
Department of Mechanical Engineering, R.V.C.E
Page 5
A compound die differs from a progressive die in that it performs two or more cutting operations
during one stroke of the press at one station only. In order to do this both the upper and lower
member of the die set carry punching and blanking elements which are directly opposed to each
other. In other words, the piercing punches act in opposite direction with respect to the blanking
punch. A simple compound die is show in figure 1.2
Page 6
In combination dies the cutting and forming or drawing operations are carried out in single
operation. The operations such as forming, drawing, extruding and embossing may be combined
with each other or with the various cutting operations such as blanking, piercing, trimming,
broaching, and cutoff. Much of the success of these dies depends on the provisions for stripping
and ejecting finished parts.
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Review of literature indicated that efforts have been made to increase tool life, reduce tool
down time, and to ensure product quality. Emphasis is given to increase the tool life with
optimum selection of punch and die clearance, where wear due to punch and die clearance is
considered as a major factor. But less amount of work has been done on determining the
behavior of punch and die inserts under stressed and stretched conditions. A few authors have
also worked to automate the design process, but more work on this field is desired. Furthermore,
FEA simulations are also carried out to confirm the tool life, but most of the studies are
conducted only on separate blanking or piercing or on forming operation. In real practice
producing a component requires series of operations carried out in a sequence. But limited work
has been done to analyze tool containing series of operations. Present need is to apply new
techniques available to ensure part quality, tool life and reduce maintenance.
Design a tool for clamp to obtain a defect free part and meet high volume production
requirement.
Analyze the punch to determine the stresses induced, and validate the results with
theoretical calculations.
Page 12
Page 13