Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Expectancy 3 Factors:
Expectancy is belief that effort leads to a specific level of performance (varies from 0
to 1)
Influences on individuals expectancies:
o Self-efficacy (affected by previous success at task)
o Help received from others
o Information, materials, equipment necessary to complete task
o People attempt to get even for perceived injustices by using either direct
(e.g., theft, sabotage, or violence) or indirect (e.g., intentionally working
slowly) retaliation
o Costs of workplace violence and employee theft is approximately $36 and
$200 billion annually, respectively
Outcome/input ratio: Relationship between what an employee gets from a job
(outcomes) and what the employee contributes to the job (inputs)
o Inputs: Education/training, skills, creativity, seniority, age, personality traits,
effort, personal appearance
o Outcomes: Pay/bonuses, fringe benefits, challenging assignments, job security,
promotions, status symbols, recognitions, participation in important decisions
Comparison of own o/i ratio to ratio of other person
o Referent: Other employee or group of employees, oneself at a different place
or time, ones expectations
Maslows Hierarchy of Needs: hypothesized that within every human being, there
exists a hierarchy of five needs:
1. Physiological. Hunger, thirst, shelter, sex, other bodily needs
2. Safety. Security and protection from physical/emotional harm
3. Social. Affection, belongingness, acceptance, friendship
4. Esteem. Internal factors such as self respect, autonomy, and achievement,
and external factors like status, recognition and attention
5. Self-actualization. Drive to become what we are capable of becoming;
includes growth, achieving our potential and self fulfillment
Theory X and Theory Y
o Douglas McGregor proposed 2 distinct views of human beings: one basically
negative (Theory X) and the other basically positive (Theory Y)
o Theory X: managers believe employees inherently dislike work and must
therefore be directed or even coerced into performing it
o Theory Y: managers assume employees can view work as being as natural as
rest or play, and therefore the average person can learn to accept and even seek
responsibility
Two Factor Theory
o Believed an individuals relationship to work is basic and that attitude toward
work can very well determine success or failure
o Concluded that the replies people gave when they felt good about their jobs
differed significantly from the replies given when they felt bad
o Intrinsic factors such as advancement, recognition, responsibility and
achievement seem related to job satisfaction
o Respondents who felt good about their work tended to attribute these factors to
themselves dissatisfied respondents tended to cite extrinsic factors, i.e.
supervision, pay, company policies and working conditions
o Opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction. Removing dissatisfying
characteristics from a job doesnt necessarily make the job satisfying
o Existence of a dual continuum: the opposite of satisfaction is no
satisfaction and the opposite of dissatisfaction is no dissatisfaction
o Characterized conditions such as quality of supervision, pay, company policies
and physical working conditions, relationships w others and job security as
HYGIENE FACTORS.
McClellands Theory of Needs
o Developed by David McClelland; focuses on 3 needs:
Need for achievement (nAch): drive to excel, to achieve in relation to
a set of standards, to strive to succeed
Need for power: (nPow) need to make others behave in a way in which
they would not have behaved otherwise
Need for affiliation (nAff): desire for friendly and close interpersonal
relationships
o Focused most attention on nAch.
High achievers perform best when they perceive their probability of
success as .5 or a 50-50 chance of success
Dislike gambling both with high odds and low odds, because then there
Is no challenge to their skills like to set goals that require stretching
themselves a little
o 1. When jobs have a high degree of personal responsibility and feedback and
an intermediate degree of risk, high achievers are strongly motivated;
successful in entrepreneurial activities such as running their own businesses
and managing self contained units within large organizations
o 2. A high need to achieve does not necessarily make someone a good manager,
especially in large organizations. Interested in how well they do personally
and not in influencing others to do well.
o 3. Needs for affiliation and power tend to be closely related to managerial
successbest managers are high in their need for power and low in their need
for affiliation. A high power motive may be a requirement for managerial
effectiveness
Contemporary Theories
Self determination theory: people prefer to feel they have control over their actions,
so anything that makes a previously enjoyed task feel like an obligation than a freely
chosen activity will undermine motivation
Cognitive evaluation theory: extrinsic rewards will reduce intrinsic interest in a task;
when people are paid for work it feels less like something they want to do and more
like something they have to do
Self concordance: considers how strongly peoples reasons for pursuing goals are
consistent w their interest and core values if individuals pursue goals bc of an
intrinsic interest, they are more likely to attain their goals and are happy even if they
dont because the process of striving toward them is fun
Goal Setting Theory
o Addresses issue of doing your best might we do better if we have specific
goals?
o Specific goals increase performance
o Difficult goals, when accepted, result in higher performance than do easy
goals
o Feedback leads to higher performance than does non-feedback
o Goal commitment: Goal setting theory assumes an individual is committed to
the goal and is determined not to lower or abandon it
o Task characteristics: Goal setting theory works better in some tasks goals
seem to have a more substantial effect on performance when tasks are simple
rather than complex,
Management by objectives (MBO): emphasizes participatively set goals that are tangible,
verifiable, and measurable
o A more systematic way to utilize goal setting
o Overall objectives are translated into specific objectives for each succeeding level in
the organization but because lower unit managers jointly participate in setting their
own goals, MBO works from the bottom up as well as from the top down results in
a hierarchy that links objectives at one level to those at the next
Self Efficacy Theory
o Self-efficacy: aka social cog theory or social learning theory refers to an individuals
beliefs that he is capable of performing a task. The higher your self efficacy, the more
confidence you have in your ability to succeed
o Individuals high in self efficacy seem to respond to negative feedback with increased
effort and motivation; low self efficacy likely to lessen effort when given negative
feedback
o can increase self efficacy by:
o Enactive mastery: Most important; gaining relevant experience w the task/job
o Vicarious modeling: Becoming more confident because you see someone else
doing the task
o Verbal persuasion: Becoming more confident bc someone convinces you that
you have the skills necessary to be successful
o Arousal: Leads to an energized state, which drives a person to complete a task
Equity Theory/Organizational Justice
o Equity plays a role in motivation employees perceive what they get from a
job situation in relation to what they put into it, and then compare their
outcome-input ratio with that of relevant others
o 4 referent comparisons:
Self inside: an employees experiences in a diff position inside the
employees current organization
Self-outside: an employees experiences in a situation or position
outside the employees current organization
Other-inside: another individual or group of individuals inside the
employees organization
Other-outside: another individual or group of individuals outside the
employees organization
o Moderating variables: gender, length of tenure, level in the organization and
amount of education or professionalism
o Employees who perceive inequality will make one of 6 choices:
Change inputs (exert more/less effort if over/under paid)
Change outcomes (increase quantity, decrease quality)
Distort perceptions of self
Distort perceptions of others
Choose a different referent
Quit the job
Expectancy theory: victor vrooms, argues that the strength of a tendency to act in a certain
way depends on the strength of our expectation of a given outcome and its attractiveness
Focuses on 3 relationships:
o Effort performance relationship: probability perceived by the individual that
exerting a given amount of effort will lead to performance
o Performance reward relationship: the degree to which the individual
believes performing at a particular level will lead to the attainment of a desired
outcome
o Rewards-personal goals relationship: degree to which organizational
rewards satisfy an individuals personal goals or needs and the attractiveness of
those potential rewards for the individual
Lecture 2: Motivation
The truth about relativity (R)
We have a tough time making evaluations. We like equalizers
If we see good tom, ugly tom and good jerry, we are more likely to be good
tom because we had something to compare it to
The brother-in-law syndrome(R)
o Equality vs. equitywhat is the difference?
Theyre not the same. Equity and inequity are perceptions of the ratio of
outcomes to inputs that are experienced in relation to a comparison
person
Op/Ip = Oo/Io (attained when this is true)
Op= outcomes received by self (p) from an experience
Ip= inputs exerted by self to achieve the experience
Oo= outcomes received by another (o) from an experience, as
seen by p
Io= inputs exerted by another to achieve the experience, as seen
by p
Equality is where outcomes of self and another are equal
Op = Oo
o Can you have equity without equality?
yes
o What are the sources of inequity in this example?
Brother in law makes more money, put in fewer inputs (didnt go to
college, also doesnt work as hard)
o Classify strategies employed by author to restore equity
Request more outcomes from employer salary and better office, more
secretarial services, more travel money, etc.
Decide that job is more interesting, more meaningful than driving a
truck
Over the road truck driving was aversive greasy truck stops,
unhealthy kidneys, bruised lower back muscles
Range: 1 to 343
Lowest observed score: 7 (typist in an overflow typing pool)
Highest observed score: 300 (management consultant)
Average MPS in U.S. corporations: 128
Psychological states
o Five job dimensions contribute to three critical psychological states
Experienced meaningfulness of work: Extent to which employees feel
their job is important, worthwhile, and meaningful
Experienced responsibility for work outcomes: Extent to which
employees feel personally responsible or accountable for their job
performance
Knowledge of results: Extent to which employees know how well they
perform their jobs
Individual differences
o Employees may differ in the way they respond to the redesign of their jobs
Growth need strength: Extent to which individual wants his or her work
to contribute to personal growth, learning, and development
Knowledge and skills: Extent to which individual possesses knowledge
and skills necessary to perform job effectively
Satisfaction with work context: Extent to which employees are satisfied
with extrinsic outcomes, such as pay, benefits, job security, etc.
Research Evidence
o Overall conclusion: Employees tend to prefer jobs that are high on five core
dimensions higher satisfaction and intrinsic motivation
o BUT, job dimension have most significant effects on intrinsic motivation and
on job satisfaction; the effects on actual work behaviors are not as strong
o Simply adding the scores for the job characteristics might be a better way of
calculating the motivating potential score than using the multiplicative formula
American Chopper
o Dependent upon extrinsic
o The best moment is when the car starts
o flextime: flexible work time, employees must work a specific number of hours
per week, but can vary the hours of work within certain limits
job sharing: allows 2+ individuals to split a traditional 40 hour a week job
allows organizations to draw on talents of more than one individual in a given job
telecommuting: working at home at least 2 days a week on a computer linked to the
employers office (similar to virtual office) working from home on a relatively permanent
basis
advantages: larger labor pool from which to select, higher productivity, less
turnover, improved moral and reduced office space costs
disadvantages: employees with high social need may feel isolated, those who are
vulnerable to out of sight, out of mind might lose out on raises and promotions
social and physical context of work
o social characteristics that improve job performance: interdependence, social
support, and interactions with other people outside work
enhance moods, help clarify their work role, gives employees greater
opportunities to obtain assistance w their work, ring about a positive feedback
loops as employees assist one another
work context also matters physical demands make people physically
uncomfortable, which is likely to show up in lower levels of job satisfaction
employees need adequate tools, equipment, materials, favorable working
conditions, helpful co-workers, supportive work rules and procedures, sufficient
information to make job related decisions and adequate time to do a good job in
order to perform well
employee involvement: participative process that uses employees input to increase
their commitment to the organizations success if we engage workers in decisions
that affect them and increase their autonomy and control over their work lives, they
will become more motivated, more committed to the organization, more productive
and more satisfied with their jobs
o participative management: joint decision making; subordinates share a significant
degree of decision making power w their immediate superiors
for this to work, employees must be interested in the issue so that they are
motivated, and that must also be competent and knowledgeable in order to
make a useful contribution
advantages: higher stock returns, lower turnover rates and higher estimated
labor productivity
disadvantages: participation typically only has a modest influence on variables
such as employee productivity, motivation and job satisfaction - it is not a
sure means for improving employee performance
o representative participation: aka the most widely legislated form of employee
involvement around the world
goal is to redistribute power within an organization, putting labor on a more
equal footing w the interests of management and stockholders by letting
workers be represented by a small group of employees who actually participate
o Capacity (or potential): One can have power but not realize it
o Dependence relationship: The greater Bs dependency on A, the greater is As
power in the relationship
o Discretion: B has some discretion over his/her behavior
o Omnipresence: Power can reside within anyone at any level of the organization
(e.g., low raking members who have important knowledge)
o Contextuality: Power often depends on the situation
Dependency
General dependency postulate
o When you possess something that others require but that you alone control,
you make them dependent on you increase in power
o If something is plentiful, possession of it will not increase your power
Sources of dependency
o Importance (e.g., Marketing departments in organizations)
o Scarcity (e.g., Ferruccio Lamborghini during World War II.)
o Nonsubstitutability (e.g., well-published faculty members)
Base Of Power
o Individual
Formal: Coercive, reward, legitimate
Personal: Expert, referent
Excercising Influence: Myths and Realities
o Formal authority does not guarantee influence establishing trust (character x
competence) via sharing of power (empowerment)
o Formal authority is a very limited source of power most people who can
make managers lives difficult are people they have no formal authority over
(e.g., bosses and peers)
o Management has to do as much with negotiating interdependencies as with
formal authority
Myth
Reality
Operative Principles
Authority
Interdependence
Source of Power
Formal authority
Everything but
Key players
Subordinates
Desired outcomes
Control, compliance
Commitment, empowerment
Key competencies
Technical
How to acquire power and exercise influence with those on whom you are dependent?
o Primary way of acquiring influence in the absence of formal authority is
through law of reciprocity (universal belief that people should be paid back
for what they do)
o Cultivate networksmutually beneficial exchange relationships based on the
law of reciprocity with those on whom you are dependent
o 6 basic rules of human behavior and reciprocation is #1. People feel they owe
people and you say yes to the people you owe.
Start with a high favor and then lower it. It increases the likelihood that
they will say yes
o 1. Reciprocity
o 2. Scarcity: people want what they cant have so you need to make it seem like
they cant get it anywhere else.
o 3. Authority
o 4. Consistency: arrange for public commitment
o 5. Consensus: what are other people doing?
o 6. Cooperation: how can I help?
Lecture 6: Science of Persuasion
Experiment in U.S. national park
o Sign was put up pointing out that lots of people had stolen wood in the past,
much damage had been done and asking people to stop
Experiment with water preservation in hotels
o We invite you to join with us to conserve water by using your towels more
than once
o Message is successful (about 60 percent of the time)
Reciprocity By Proxy:
o Traditional reciprocal exchange
A provides resources to Party B, making Party B feel indebted to Party
A, which in turn obligates Party B to return the favor to Party A
o Reciprocity-by-proxy
Party A can also create in Party B a personal obligation to reciprocate
by providing resources on Party Bs behalf to a third party (Party C)
that Party B values
Standard environmental control message
o HELP SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT. You can show your respect for nature
and help save the environment by reusing your towels during your stay.
Reciprocity-by-proxy
o WERE DOING OUR PART FOR THE ENVIRONMENT. CAN WE
COUNT ON YOU? Because we are committed to preserving the environment,
we have made a financial contribution to a nonprofit environmental protection
organization on behalf of the hotel and its guests. If you would like to help us
in recovering the expense, while conserving natural resources, please reuse
your towels during your stay.
Incentive-by-proxy
o PARTNER WITH US TO HELP SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT. In exchange
for your participation in this program, we at the hotel will donate a percentage
of the energy savings to a nonprofit environmental protection organization. The
environment deserves our combined efforts. You can join us by reusing your
towels during your stay.
Reciprocity by proxy is the most effective
o Increases sense of obligation and elicits norm of reciprocity but does not
change trust or perceived care for the environment
People feel less obligated to reciprocate the favors of others in an organizational
compared to a personal context. This is because they were less likely to think that the
peoples motives for helping were genuine and reflected their true character. In an
organizational context, people are more calculative and do other favors based on
usefulness in the future.
o 3 components:
o 1. Dispostional attribution about the favor 2. Desire to reciprocate 3.
Context dispositional attribution about the favor.
Negotiation: An ongoing activity of social decision making where two or more
interdependent parties with some interests in common engage in back-and-forth
communication aimed at reaching a settlement.
Building Blocks of Negotiation:
1. Parties: Negotiations takes place among parties
o Two-party vs. multiple-party ( opportunity for coalition building)
2. Issues: Matters over which parties disagree and seek to reach an agreement on
o Number of issues (single issue, such as price zero sum, distributive neg. vs.
multiple issues integrative, joint neg.)
3. Interests: What parties seek to advance in negotiation, why they take a position
o Positions (10% salary increase) vs. interests (I want credit for a job well
done)
Ultimatum game (flipping a coin)
o Rational solution was predicting that proposer should offer the smallest
possible share and responder would accept it
o 1st study (Gth, Schmittberger, Schwarze, 1983):
Average offer was 37% of the pie
o Average offers are in region of 40-50% of the pie
o The higher the stakes, the closer offers approach even split
Why are non-50-50 proposal rejected?
o Second person refuses proposal with chances of rejection increasing with a
decrease in amount offered
o 80/20 splits are rejected 70% of the time
o From an rational economic perspective, this makes no sense, or does it?
o Ingrained sense of fairness can override economic interests (but what are the
alternatives?)
o Whats more likely to get accepted? 55-45 or 51-49 split
Limbic Justice
o Act of immediate rejection seems to be mediated by the limbic system and is
not solely driven by cortical processes
Integrative Negotiation
Why dont we see more integrative negotiation? Because it requires the
following conditions:
o Parties who are open with information and candid about their concerns
o Sensitivity to the others needs
o Ability to trust one another
o Willingness to maintain flexible
Conditions are often not met in organizations
Negotiators dilemma
Guidelines
Build trust and think of relationship
Ask diagnostic questions
Share important information
Unbundle the issues
Make package deals, not single-issue offers
Capitalize on differences in needs/desires
Dont forget to claim value once its created
Six Habits of Merely Effective Negotiators (R)
In any negotiation, each side ultimately must choose between accepting a deal or
taking its best no deal option that is, the course of action it would take if the deal
were not possible
Mistake 1: neglecting the other sides problem
o You cant negotiate effectively unless you understand your own interests and
your own no-deal options
o Since the other side will say yes for its reasons, not yours, agreement requires
understanding and addressing your counterparts problem as a means to
solving your own
o If you want to change someones mind, you should first learn where that
persons mind is
Mistake 2: letting price bulldoze other interests
o Negotiators who pay attention exclusively to price turn potentially cooperative
deals into adversarial ones. Use hard bargaining tactics that often leave
potential joint gains unrealized. Bc while the price is an important factor in
most deals, its rarely the only one. Most deals are 50% emotion and 50%
economics.
o Most turn down proposals that dont let them share in at least 35-40% of the
bounty, this is irrational on a pure price basis, but studies show that when a
split feels too unequal to people, they reject the spoils as unfair, are offended
by the process, and perhaps try to teach the greedy person a lesson
o Need to value the relationship, the social contract, the process, the interests of
the full set of players
o Organizational factors
o So many employees w different traits, yet extent of political behavior varies
widely
o Certain situations and cultures promote politics specifically when an
organizations resources are declining, when the existing pattern of resources is
changing and when there is opportunity for promotions, politicking more likely
to surface
o Response to organizational politics
Organizational politics may threaten employees
Decreased job satisfaction
Increased anxiety and stress due to the perception that by not engaging in
politics, a person may be losing ground to others who are active politickers
Increased turnover
Reduced performance (self reported)
Qualifiers if understand decision making processes, increased performance. But
when understanding is low, likely o see politics as a threat
Defensive behaviors: reactive and protective behaviors to avoid action, blame, or
change how many employees respond when see politics as a threat
Impression management: process by which individuals attempt to control the impression of
others form of them
High self monitors are concerned w this theyre good at reading situations and
molding their appearances and behavior to fit each situation
IM Techniques:
Conformity: agreeing w someone elses opinion to gain his or her approval
(ingratiation)
Favors: doing something nice for someone to gain their approval (ingratiation)
Excuses: explanations of a predicament-creating event aimed at minimizing the
apparent severity of the predicament (defensive)
Apologies: admitting responsibility for undesirable event and simultaneously
seeking to get a pardon for the action (defensive)
Self promotion: highlighting best qualities, downplaying deficits, calling attention
to ones achievement (self focused)
Enhancement: claiming that something you did is more valuable than most other
members of the organization would think (self focused)
Flattery: complimenting others about their virtues in an effort to make oneself
appear perceive and likeable (assertive)
Exemplification: doing more than you need to in an effort to show how dedicated
and how hard you are (assertive)