Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
6, JUNE 2015
3473
AbstractTo increase the power conversion density, decrease switching losses and electromagnetic interference
(EMI), and provide safe operating area for a switch, applying
snubber circuits which provide soft-switching conditions is
inevitable. Among different types of snubber circuits, passive snubbers, due to their simplicity and robustness, are
preferred. These snubber circuits can obtain soft-switching
conditions without any additional switch. Thus, gate drive
and control circuits remain simple. In this paper, a simple
lossless passive snubber circuit which can be applied on
isolated and nonisolated converters is introduced. The proposed snubber circuit provides zero-current-switching and
zero-voltage-switching conditions at turn-on and turnoff
instants, respectively. The proposed snubber is applied on
a boost converter and analyzed. Also, in order to prove
the effectiveness of the proposed snubber circuit from
the converter efciency and EMI viewpoints, a 200-W prototype boost converter is implemented, and experimental
results are presented. Also, the simulation results of a
soft-switched yback converter with the proposed snubber
cell are presented.
Index TermsEfciency, electromagnetic interference
(EMI), lossless passive snubber, soft switching.
I. I NTRODUCTION
0278-0046 2014 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
3474
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2. Soft-switched boost converter with the proposed lossless passive snubber.
MOHAMMADI et al.: FAMILY OF SOFT-SWITCHING SINGLE-SWITCH PWM CONVERTERS WITH PASSIVE SNUBBER
Fig. 3.
3475
VO Vin
(t t0 )
Lin
Vo
(t t0 )
Ls1
CS
sin ((t t0 ))
iLS2 (t) = VCS (t0 )
LS2
VCS (t) = VCS (t0 ) cos ((t t0 )) .
iLS1 (t) =
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Fig. 4.
Vin
(t t1 ).
Ls1 + Lin
(6)
3476
iin
(t t3 )
CS
(7)
VO
(t t3 ).
LS3
(8)
TABLE I
VOLTAGE AND C URRENT S TRESSES OF THE S EMICONDUCTOR
E LEMENTS OF THE P ROPOSED B OOST C ONVERTER
LS1 >
(10)
(11)
where Vsw , isw , tr , and tf are the maximum switch voltage and
current and the switch current rise and fall times, respectively.
To recover the stored energy in the snubber capacitor, the
value of LS2 should be chosen properly. For this purpose, the
quarter of the period of the resonance started in Mode 1 must
be smaller than the minimum switch-on time
2Tsw 2
1
LS2 <
(12)
CS
+ VO
1
2
LS2
LS2
LS1
PO
I
+
= (1 + na )VO +
CS Vin D
2
isw(av.) =
isw
Vsw
(14)
(15)
(16)
MOHAMMADI et al.: FAMILY OF SOFT-SWITCHING SINGLE-SWITCH PWM CONVERTERS WITH PASSIVE SNUBBER
3477
TABLE II
PARAMETERS OF THE I MPLEMENTED C ONVERTER
Fig. 5. (Top) Voltage and (bottom) current waveforms of (a) the converter switch S and (b) the output rectifier diode DO .
3478
Fig. 7. Voltage and current of the converter switch under 20-W output
power (volt div. = 50 V/dec; current div. = 0.5 A/dec).
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
CISPR 22 LISN.
the heat sink voltage is floating with respect to earth, and CDE
is measured around 16 pF.
The measured total conducted EMI (on input line L1 ) of the
proposed and regular boost converters is shown in Fig. 12 using
the peak detection mode of the HAMEG-HMS1000 spectrum
analyzer. In addition to electromagnetic emissions, the CISPR
22 class A limit is shown with the dashed line for the 150-KHz
30-MHz frequency band. According to Fig. 12, the two main
EMI peaks of the conventional boost converter are 84 and
86.5 dBV at 270 kHz and 11 MHz, respectively. The corresponding values for the proposed converter are around 78.5
and 73 dBV at about 270 kHz and 15.6 MHz, respectively.
Consequently, the first and second EMI peaks are reduced by
about 6.5 and 13.5 dBV. In other words, the proposed lossless
passive snubber has the benefit of EMI reduction of up to
13.5 dBV with respect to the hard-switching boost converter.
For better comparison, the EMI peaks for various frequency
MOHAMMADI et al.: FAMILY OF SOFT-SWITCHING SINGLE-SWITCH PWM CONVERTERS WITH PASSIVE SNUBBER
3479
Fig. 12. Conducted EMI measurement. (a) Hard-switching boost converter; vertical axis: 0100 dBV; horizontal axis: 0.15 M30 MHz.
(b) Proposed boost converter; vertical axis: 090 dBV; horizontal axis:
0.15 M30 MHz.
Fig. 14. Nonisolated soft-switched converters with the proposed passive snubber. (a) Buck. (b) Buckboost. (c) Cuk. (d) Sepic. (e) Zeta.
Fig. 13. Comparison between experimental results of conducted electromagnetic emissions for the regular and proposed boost converters.
3480
Fig. 16. Simulation waveforms of the soft-switched flyback converter with the proposed snubber circuit. (a) Converter switch voltage,
(b) converter switch current, (c) output rectifier diode voltage, and
(d) output rectifier diode current (time scale: 0.5 s/dec).
VIII. C ONCLUSION
Providing soft-switching conditions in power converters has
many advantages such as increasing the converter efficiency
and power conversion density and reducing EMI. In this paper,
a lossless passive snubber circuit which is able to be applied
in many isolated and nonisolated converters is introduced. The
experimental results clarify that the converters efficiency is
improved by the use of the proposed lossless snubber circuit.
Also, in order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed
snubber in reducing the conducted EMI, the conducted EMI of
the boost converter with the proposed snubber is measured and
is compared to its hard-switching counterpart, which shows the
significance of the conducted EMI reduction.
R EFERENCES
Fig. 15. Isolated soft-switched converters with the proposed passive
snubber. (a) Forward. (b) Flyback. (c) Isolated Cuk. (d) Isolated Sepic.
(e) Isolated Zeta.
TABLE III
VALUES OF THE F LYBACK C ONVERTER S C OMPONENTS
[1] Y.-W. Kim, J.-H. Kim, K.-Y. Choi, B.-S. Suh, and R.-Y. Kim, A novel
soft-switched auxiliary resonant circuit of a PFC ZVT-PWM boost converter for an integrated multichip power module fabrication, IEEE Trans.
Ind. Appl., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 28022809, Nov./Dec. 2013.
[2] Y.-S. Kim, W.-Y. Sung, and B.-K. Lee, Comparative performance analysis of high density and efficiency PFC topologies, IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 26662679, Jun. 2014.
[3] M. R. Mohammadi and H. Farzanehfard, New family of zero-voltagetransition PWM bidirectional converters with coupled inductors, IEEE
Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 912919, Feb. 2012.
[4] S. Dusmez and A. Khaligh, A compact and integrated multifunctional
power electronic interface for plug-in electric vehicles, IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 56905701, Dec. 2013.
[5] H. F. Xiao, X. P. Liu, and K. Lan, Zero-voltage-transition full-bridge
topologies for transformerless photovoltaic grid-connected inverter,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 53935401, Oct. 2014.
[6] N. Sukesh, M. Pahlevaninezhad, and P. K. Jain, Analysis and implementation of a single-stage flyback PV microinverter with soft switching,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 18191833, Apr. 2014.
[7] J.-S. Lai et al., A hybrid-switch-based soft-switching inverter for
ultrahigh-efficiency traction motor drives, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.,
vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 19661973, May/Jun. 2014.
[8] A. K. Rathore and P. U R, Analysis, design, experimental results of novel
snubberless bidirectional naturally clamped ZCS/ZVS current-fed halfbridge dc/dc converter for fuel cell vehicles, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,
vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 44824491, Oct. 2013.
MOHAMMADI et al.: FAMILY OF SOFT-SWITCHING SINGLE-SWITCH PWM CONVERTERS WITH PASSIVE SNUBBER
3481