Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
What are the main regulatory approaches to encourage quality of long-term care.................................4
How can care processes be better standardised for better quality...........................................................6
Can market and transparency incentives be better leveraged for quality improvement? ..................7
% 80+ 2010
% 80+ 2050
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Policy Brief A Good Life in Old Age OECD/European Commission June 2013
Social LTC
Mexico
Slovak Republic
Australia
Portugal
Estonia
Czech Republic
Hungary (2008)
Poland
Korea
United States
Spain
Luxembourg
Slovenia (2008)
Germany
Japan
Austria
Canada
New Zealand
Switzerland (2009)
OECD
Iceland
France
Belgium
Finland
Norway
Denmark
Sweden
Netherlands
0.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
% of GDP
Policy Brief A Good Life in Old Age OECD/European Commission June 2013
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
0%
CCC
BC
LTC
MB
NL
NS
Australia
Spain
New Zealand
Israel
Latvia
Canada
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Portugal
Slovenia
Ireland
Czech Republic
Iceland
Denmark
Poland
Malta
Norway
Germany
Sweden
Hungary
Finland
Mexico
Austria
Korea
0
100 200 300 400 500 600
Male Uncontrolled diabetes hospital admission rates,
population aged 80 and over, 2009 (or nearest year)
Female Uncontrolled diabetes hospital admission rates,
population aged 80 and over, 2009 (or nearest year)
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Very good
Good
Fair
Bad
Health Status
Very bad
Policy Brief A Good Life in Old Age OECD/European Commission June 2013
and
minimum
Policy Brief A Good Life in Old Age OECD/European Commission June 2013
Policy Brief A Good Life in Old Age OECD/European Commission June 2013
Policy Brief A Good Life in Old Age OECD/European Commission June 2013
Box 3. Measuring and monitoring quality of long-term care in a selection of OECD and EU countries
In Australia, a set of common community care standards have been implemented by most
jurisdictions since 2011 to integrate and standardise accreditation for community care services. According
to this regulation, there are 18 indicators (and associated expected outcomes) covering management,
access and service delivery, as well as service users rights. The performance of providers is monitored
through the Community Care Quality Reporting Programme.
In Canada, data on LTC quality are collected through standardised assessment instruments (RAI) and
submitted to the Continuing Care Reporting System of the Canadian Institute for Health Information
(CIHI). Information is provided on volumes and pathways, demographics, outcome scales, quality
indicators, and resource utilisation, at the provider level.
In Finland, quality indicators are derived from a voluntary quality development network using the
RAI assessment instruments in place since 2000. Although the coverage is about 30% of the total LTC
users, the collected information are standardised and comparable across different counties using RAI
assessment instruments. Some local authorities require RAI-based quality information as part of the
service procurement contracts for residential care.
In Germany, The Medical Advisory Boards of the Health Insurance Funds (Medizinische Dienste der
Krankenversicherung) is a central body responsible for needs assessment and quality assurance in LTC.
Providers are obliged to meet transparency agreements and report information which feed into
transparency reports (started in 2009). These include information on inspections of the rooms, living
areas and documentation on relevant activities, as well as the results of personal visits among the
residents. The quality related indicators measured by the audits and inspections are related to nursing
and health care and patient satisfaction as well as structural aspects.
In the Netherlands, the Ministry of Health developed the CQIndex to measure the experiences of
patients in nursing homes and homes for the elderly. The CQIndex is based on the national quality
framework for responsible care which specifies ten quality domains such as quality of life and
satisfaction of users. The institutions are ranked and the information is available to the public.
In Portugal, an on-line web based system of data management (GestCare CCI) was developed to
compliment the National Network of Integrated Continuous Care (RNCCI) in 2007. This allows the
continuous monitoring of assessments of recipients across transitory care and long-term care at provider,
regional and national level. Providers are required to collect and report data for a minimal data set.
Needs assessment is the instrument that assists the monitoring process and provides a basis for the
publication of a report every six months.
In Sweden, registries offer a rich source of quality information among elderly people. For example,
the Senior Alert Registry, started in 2009, gathers individual data on falls, pressure sores and malnutrition
to help in identifying elderly people at risk. By 2012, 274 municipalities (out of 290) reported data to the
registry. Using such data and surveys, Sweden has recently started a website, Elderly Guide containing
quality data for all municipalities as well as special housing, home-help services and day care services
units. Thirty-six indicators such as responsiveness, care co-ordination, and quality of life are reported.
In the United States, some of the data submitted from Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing
homes and home health agencies are posted on the website of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS). The public is free to access the information and evaluation of each facility and provider.
Policy Brief A Good Life in Old Age OECD/European Commission June 2013
Did you know? Key Facts about Long-term Care in OECD countries
In 2010, OECD countries allocated 1.6% of GDP to public spending on LTC. LTC expenditure has grown
on average at an annual rate of over 9% since 2000 across 25 OECD countries, compared to 4% for public
expenditure on health.
LTC services are increasingly being delivered in care recipients homes. In 2010, over 8% of people
aged 65 years old and over received care at home while less than 4% of them received care in
institutions.
Less than a third of OECD countries collect LTC quality measures systematically e.g., in Canadian
provinces, Finland, Iceland, Korea, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and the United States.
In more than two-thirds of 27 OECD and EU countries reviewed, accreditation of LTC institutions is
either compulsory (England, Spain, Ireland and France), or is a condition for reimbursement or
contracting (e.g., Australia Germany, Spain, Ireland, England, and Portugal, the United States).
Protection mechanisms to prevent elder abuse include national awareness campaigns (e.g. Ireland),
training of care workers to identify and respond abuses (e.g., Ireland, Canada, Israel, the United States),
and complaint or reporting mechanisms (e.g. Alberta, Ontario and Nova Scotia, Canada; Germany,
Norway, the United States, the Netherlands, Japan, England and Scotland.
Educational requirements for personal care workers vary significantly, ranging from around 75 hours
in the United States to 430 hours in Australia, and from 75 weeks of total training in Denmark to three
years training for certified care workers in Japan.
More than one-third of OECD countries make information on care providers available in the form of
public reports at the national level.
Further reading
OECD/European Commission (2013), A Good Life in
Old Age? Monitoring and Improving Quality in Longterm Care, OECD Publishing, Paris,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264194564-en
OECD Publishing
ISBN 978-92-79-28944-6
(print)
ISBN: 978-92-79-28943-9
(PDF)
265 pages
17 June 2013