MPS Academic Progress Report

2015-2016 RAP Slides:
Addendum
Leading and Lagging Indicators
Perception
Sense of Belonging
Motivation
Relationships
Structure
Culture and Climate
Leadership
Teacher Quality
Schedule
Structure
Behavior
Attendance
Grades
Extra-curricular
Formative
Diagnostic
Interim
Summative
Structure
Grade configuration
#10: Student Persistence Rating

10
9
8
7
District
Average
6
5
4
3
2
1
African
African American American Indian
Asian
Hispanic
White
EL
SPED
Persistence Profiles
Total n
Average
Persist.
Score
Average
Reading
MCA Scale
Score
Average
Math MCA
Scale Score
Average
Reading
Growth ZScore
Average
Math
Growth ZScore
Average
Percent
Attend.
Average
GPA
Average
Number of
Behavior
Infractions
Average
Number of
Suspensions
Near the top
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
More than
most
1,377
7.3
50.2
50.1
0.01
0.01
95%
3.00
0.5
0.06
In the middle
11,353
6.3
50.9
50.9
-0.01
-0.02
95%
2.58
0.6
0.05
Less than most
3,147
4.7
42.8
43.1
-0.15
-0.21
93%
2.42
1.3
0.11
Near the
bottom
349
3.5
40.2
41.2
-0.30
-0.52
93%
2.06
1.5
0.11
DISTRICT
16,226
6.0
49.3
49.3
-0.04
-0.06
95%
2.58
0.7
0.07
Persistence
Category
STUDENT TRACKER FALL ENROLLMENT

Pct MPS Students Enrolled in College the Fall Immediately Following
Graduation from HS
STUDENT TRACKER FIRST YEAR ENROLLMENT

Pct Students Enrolled in College at Any Time During the First Year After High
School
STUDENT TRACKER TWO YEAR ENROLLMENT

Pct Students Enrolled in College at Any Time During the First Two Years After
HS Graduation
STUDENT TRACKER RETENTION

Pct Students Enrolled in College the First Year After HS Grad who Returned
the Second Year (Freshman to Sophomore Persistence)
STUDENT TRACKER INSTITUTION TYPE
Pct Students Enrolled in College Within First Year of Graduation from HS

Class of 2014 by Institutional Level (2-year vs. 4-year)
STUDENT TRACKER INSTITUTION TYPE by SPECIAL POPULATIONS
Pct Students Enrolled in College within the First Year of Graduation from HS 2014 by
Institutional Level (2-year vs. 4-year)
10
STUDENT TRACKER TOP PLACEMENT SITES

Most common Institution of Initial Enrollment
MPS RANK
EDISON
HENRY
Augsburg Col
U of WI Madison
MCTC
WASHBURN
U of WI
Madison
Normandale
CC
St. Paul Col
North
MN State Hennepin CC Mankato
Augsburg Col
St. Catherine St. Catherine

Normandale U of MN Augsburg Col
U
U
CC
Duluth
Normandale Dunwoody
CC
Col
MCTC
ALL
U of M - Twin U of M Twin U of M - Twin U of M - Twin U of M - Twin U of M - Twin U of M Twin U of M - Twin

Cities
Cities
Cities
Cities (1156)
Cities
Cities
Cities
Cities
St. Paul
College
MN State
Mankato
MCTC
SOUTHWEST
MN State
Augsburg Col Augsburg Col
Mankato
St. Catherine MN State St. Cloud
U
Mankato
State
MCTC
SOUTH
MCTC
MCTC
ROOSEVELT
MCTC
NORTH
Normandale
CC
MN State
Mankato
Normandale St. Catherine

St. Cloud
Augsburg Col
CC
U
State
MCTC (1996)
Normandale
CC (302)
Augsburg Col
(300)
MN State
Mankato
(271)
Hamiline U
St. Catherine
U (217)
Augsburg Col
St. Paul Col

(166)
U of WI
Madison
(184)
U of St.
Thomas
St. Catherine U of MN U
Duluth
St. Olaf Col
North
St. Olaf Col
Hennepin CC
St. Paul Col
Dunwoody
College
Hamline U
U of WI Milwaukee
St. Paul Col
U of MN
Duluth
U of St.
Thomas
North
St. Cloud
Hennepin CC State
MN State Mankato
U of St.
Thomas
St. Catherine U of St.

U
Thomas (157)
10
St. Cloud
State U
St. Cloud
State U
Dunwoody
College
Hamline U
U of St.
Thomas
Gustavus
St. Paul Col
Adolphus Col
U of MN
Duluth (150)11
Percent Attendance by Ethnicity
12
Percent Attendance by English Learner

Status
13
Percent Attendance by Special

Education Status
14
Percent Attendance by Free/ReducedPrice Lunch Status
15
GPA and Proficiency
16
Avg. GPA and Suspensions

3.50
3.00
2.50
AVG GPA
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
AMER INDIAN
AFRICAN AMER
(ENG HL)
AFRICAN AMER
(NON ENG HL)
ASIAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
TOT GR9-12
NO SUSP
1.79
1.98
2.54
3.01
2.24
3.10
2.52
1 OR MORE SUSP
1.16
1.55
1.89
2.33
1.56
1.88
1.59
17
Reading Proficiency and Suspensions

MCA Reading 2015 - Proficiency by Suspensions vs. No
Suspensions
90%
80%
Percent Proficient
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
AMER INDIAN
NO SUSP
1 OR MORE SUSP
23.1%
12.2%
AFRICAN
AMER (ENG
HL)
25.8%
7.3%
AFRICAN
AMER (NON
ENG HL)
22.9%
10.4%
ASIAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
TOTAL
40.3%
54.5%
26.2%
5.5%
77.6%
30.4%
44.1%
10.1%
18
Math Proficiency and Suspensions

MCA Math 2015 - Proficiency by Suspensions vs. No Suspensions
90%
80%
70%
Percent Proficient
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
AMER INDIAN
AFRICAN AMER
(ENG HL)
AFRICAN AMER
(NON ENG HL)
ASIAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
TOTAL
NO SUSP
21.5%
25.6%
27.0%
50.7%
33.2%
78.4%
46.7%
1 OR MORE SUSP
14.7%
6.7%
2.5%
44.4%
7.4%
35.7%
9.3%
19
Reading Growth and Suspensions

MCA READ GROWTH BY NO
SUSPENSIONS VS. ONE OR MORE
GROW
AFRICAN AMER AFRICAN AMER
TH
(ENG HL)
(NON ENG HL)
LEVEL AMER INDIAN
SUSP
COUNT
CAT
N
PCT
N
PCT
N
PCT
NO
SUSP LOW
158
31.8% 1086 39.0%
452
36.3%
ASIAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
Total
PCT
PCT
PCT
PCT
259
29.3%
766
32.1%
957
22.9%
3678
30.7%
MED
199
40.0%
1042
37.4%
451
36.3%
340
38.5%
966
40.5%
1583
37.8%
4581
38.2%
HIGH
140
28.2%
658
23.6%
341
27.4%
285
32.2%
656
27.5%
1647
39.3%
3727
31.1%
1 OR
MORE LOW
SUSP
26
43.3%
192
46.5%
35
41.2%
22.2%
28
45.2%
20
41.7%
303
44.8%
MED
19
31.7%
147
35.6%
31
36.5%
66.7%
24
38.7%
18
37.5%
245
36.2%
HIGH
15
25.0%
74
17.9%
19
22.4%
11.1%
10
16.1%
10
20.8%
129
19.1%
20
Math Growth and Suspensions

MCA MATH GROWTH BY NO
SUSPENSIONS VS. ONE OR MORE
GROW
AFRICAN AMER AFRICAN AMER
TH
(ENG HL)
(NON ENG HL)
LEVEL AMER INDIAN
SUSP
COUNT
CAT
N
PCT
N
PCT
N
PCT
NO
SUSP LOW
185
40.7%
951
38.1%
380
32.6%
ASIAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
Total
PCT
PCT
PCT
PCT
200
26.8%
709
32.2%
838
21.6%
3263
29.8%
MED
169
37.1%
1017
40.7%
450
38.6%
315
42.2%
879
39.9%
1606
41.3%
4436
40.5%
HIGH
101
22.2%
529
21.2%
337
28.9%
232
31.1%
617
28.0%
1444
37.1%
3260
29.7%
1 OR
MORE LOW
SUSP
24
46.2%
180
55.7%
46
58.2%
57.1%
22
43.1%
17
41.5%
293
53.0%
MED
20
38.5%
101
31.3%
23
29.1%
28.6%
18
35.3%
14
34.1%
178
32.2%
HIGH
15.4%
42
13.0%
10
12.7%
14.3%
11
21.6%
10
24.4%
82
14.8%
21
Long Version
22
Percent of Students who Met or Exceeded the Standards on 2013-2015 MCAIII Reading by Tested Grade (MPS vs. State)
80%
70%
Percent Proficient
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
MPS 2013 (MCA-III)
MPS 2014 (MCA-III)
MPS 2015 (MCA-III)
Grade 3
42%
41%
41%
Grade 4
39%
39%
41%
Grade 5
44%
48%
49%
Grade 6
41%
41%
46%
Grade 7
40%
41%
37%
Grade 8
38%
44%
42%
Grade 10
49%
43%
30%
Total
42%
42%
42%
State 2013 (MCA-III)

57%
58%
59%
54%
55%
58%
64%
68%
67%
59%
61%
64%
54%
56%
56%
54%
56%
56%
62%
60%
57%
58%
59%
59%
23
#1: Reading proficiency by race/ethnicity

100%
90%
80%
Percent Proficient
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
AMER INDIAN
2012 MCA-II
2013 MCA-III
2014 MCA-III
2015 MCA-III
42%
22%
21%
20%
AFRICAN
AMER (ENG
HL)
40%
21%
21%
21%
AFRICAN
AMER (NON
ENG HL)
44%
22%
23%
22%
ASIAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
DIST TOTAL
53%
40%
41%
40%
40%
22%
23%
25%
87%
75%
78%
77%
57%
42%
42%
42%
24
#1: Reading proficiency by student group
100%
90%
80%
Percent Proficient
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ELL Students
Non-ELL Students
Special Education
Non Special Ed.
F/R Price Lunch
Not Eligible for F/R

Price Lunch
MPS 2013
12%
51%
14%
46%
22%
78%
MPS 2014
10%
52%
15%
46%
23%
72%
MPS 2015
10%
52%
14%
47%
23%
77%
25
Percent of Students Met or Exceeded the Standards on 2013-2015 MCA-II & MCA-III
Math by Tested Grade (MPS vs. State)
100%
90%
Percent Proficient
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
MPS 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III)
MPS 2014 (MCA-III)
MPS 2015 (MCA-III)
Grade 3
52%
52%
52%
Grade 4
50%
49%
52%
Grade 5
40%
46%
45%
Grade 6
38%
38%
41%
Grade 7
40%
39%
36%
Grade 8
39%
44%
44%
Grade 11
35%
25%
28%
Total
43%
44%
44%
State 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III)

72%
72%
71%
71%
70%
70%
60%
62%
60%
57%
57%
58%
56%
57%
55%
59%
60%
58%
52%
51%
49%
61%
61%
60%
26
#2: Math proficiency by race/ethnicity
100%
90%
80%
Percent Proficient
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
AMER INDIAN
2012 MCA-II/III
2013 MCA-II/III
2014 MCA-III
2015 MCA-III
19%
23%
23%
19%
AFRICAN
AMER (ENG
HL)
18%
22%
21%
21%
AFRICAN
AMER (NON
ENG HL)
20%
25%
24%
25%
ASIAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
DIST TOTAL
43%
46%
48%
51%
27%
29%
31%
32%
70%
73%
77%
78%
40%
43%
44%
44%
*Note: In 2013, grades 3-8 Math figures are based on the MCA-III Math Standards, Grade 11 figures are based on the MCA-II. 2014 and27
beyond, all grades were assessed on the MCA-III standards
#2: Math proficiency by student group
100%
90%
80%
Percent Proficient
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ELL Students
Non-ELL Students Special Education
Non Special Ed.
F/R Price Lunch
Not Eligible for

F/R Price Lunch
MPS 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III)
20%
50%
17%
47%
25%
76%
MPS 2014 (MCA-III)
20%
51%
16%
47%
26%
69%
MPS 2015 (MCA-III)
20%
53%
15%
49%
26%
78%
28
Four-Year Graduation Rate Trends
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50.1%
52.5%
58.7%
41.5%
43.1%
49.0%
35.6%
44.3%
52.4%
69.8%
69.7%
77.3%
36.8%
40.5%
45.0%
19.1%
23.6%
22.8%
10%
34.8%
39.3%
42.7%
20%
25.0%
32.6%
29.2%
30%
48.7%
50.4%
58.8%
40%
67.2%
67.2%
77.6%
50%
0%
AMER
INDIAN
AFRICAN
AFRICAN
AMER (ENG AMER (NON
HL)
ENG HL)
Class of 2012 (AYP Year 2013)
ASIAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
ELL
SPEC ED
FRL
DIST TOTAL
29
#7: % of students attending school 95% of the time
Average Daily Attendance
100%
95%
9 absences
90%
17 absences
85%
26 absences
AMER INDIAN
AFRICAN AMER (ENG HL)
80%
AFRICAN AMER (NON ENG

HL)
ASIAN
HISPANIC
75%
KIND GR1
GR2
GR3
GR4
GR5
GR6
GR7
GR8
GR9 GR10 GR11 GR12
30
2015 MCA-III Math Proficiency by Attendance Grade
90%
80%
Percent Proficient
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
AMER INDIAN
A - 95-100%
B - 90-94%
C - 85-89%
D 85 or BELOW
TOT N
32.4%
19.6%
14.4%
5.8%
647
AFRICAN
AMER (ENG
HL)
30.2%
19.7%
13.4%
7.4%
3886
AFRICAN
AMER (NON
ENG HL)
29.6%
22.0%
15.7%
9.4%
1941
ASIAN
HISPANIC
WHITE
DIST TOT
53.0%
47.2%
38.7%
28.6%
37.2%
24.4%
22.1%
11.3%
82.9%
71.2%
60.2%
37.6%
52.5%
39.2%
25.5%
11.9%
1069
3057
5302
15902
31
#8: % of Advanced Placement (AP) and International

Baccalaureate (IB) exams taken by MPS students for which a
potential college-credit eligible score was earned
100%
Percent of Exams Earning a Credit-Eligible Score
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
IB Exams
AP Exams
Combined (IB & AP)
Total Exams
Taken
American
Indian
24%
17%
18%
50
30%
18%
17%
African
American
31%
29%
24%
190
362
African
Asian
Hispanic
White
District Total
41%
83%
39%
35%
31%
29%
64%
46%
60%
52%
43%
48%
499
333
2516
4019
32
#9: % of students scoring a 21 or higher on the ACT - overall

and by student group
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
AMER INDIAN
AFRICAN
AMER (NON
ENG HL)
ASIAN
SY2013
SY2014
WHITE
SPEC ED
FRL
13%
12%
13%
11%
6%
10%
1%
1%
ELL
33%
35%
HISPANIC
1%
11%
14%
10%
28%
24%
8%
8%
24%
AFRICAN
AMER (ENG
HL)
5%
11%
11%
0%
15%
14%
13%
10%
23%
20%
33%
30%
71%
74%
40%
68%
50%
DIST TOTAL
SY2015
33
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
STATE
MPS
SPPS
WHITE
WHITE
AMER IND
AFRICAN AMER
HISPANIC
ASIAN
WHITE
AMER IND
AFRICAN AMER
HISPANIC
ASIAN
AMER IND
AFRICAN AMER
HISPANIC
ASIAN
AMER IND
AFRICAN AMER
HISPANIC
ASIAN
WHITE
70%
70%
60%
60%
50%
50%
ANOKA-HENN
40%
30%
20%
10%
STATE
MPS
SPPS
AMER IND
AFRICAN AMER
HISPANIC
ASIAN
WHITE
80%
WHITE
80%
AMER IND
AFRICAN AMER
HISPANIC
ASIAN
90%
WHITE
90%
AMER IND
AFRICAN AMER
HISPANIC
ASIAN
2015 MCA-III Math
AMER IND
AFRICAN AMER
HISPANIC
ASIAN
WHITE
MCA-III Math and Reading District wide Proficiency 2015

Metro Comparison with Relative Achievement Gaps by Ethnic
2015 MCA-III Reading
0%
ANOKA-HENN
34
#16 & #17: % of students meeting or exceeding expected

growth targets in reading and math
90%
80%
77% 77%
75%
71%
70%
69% 68%
68% 67%
67%
64% 64%
63% 63%
60%
57%
60% 60%
64% 63%
57% 59%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
AMER
INDIAN
AFRICAN
AFRICAN
AMER (ENG AMER (NON
HL)
ENG HL)
ASIAN
HISPANIC
Reading
WHITE
ELL
SPEC ED
FRL
DIST TOTAL
Math
35
#18: Percent of Students who enrolled in at least one advanced

course and received a C or above (AP, IB, CIS, PSEO)
100%
Percent of Students Earning a "C" or above
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
SY14
SY15
American
Indian
28%
28%
African
American
39%
36%
Asian
Hispanic
White
EL
60%
59%
42%
38%
73%
76%
30%
30%
Special
Education
26%
21%
District Total
53%
52%
36
#19 & #20: % of English learners meeting language growth

and proficiency targets
60%
52%
50%
51%
47%
40%
% meeting language growth

targets
% meeting language proficiency
targets
30%
20%
14%
15%
17%
10%
0%
SY13
SY14
SY15
37
MCA Math Summary

District-wide Growth Students Only
2014
Exceeds
( X60)
156 (2%)
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
341 (3%)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
485 (5%)
502 (5%)
635 (6%) 1,001 (10%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
588 (6%)
486 (5%)
466 (5%)
502 (5%)
Does Not
1,856 (18%) 711 (7%)
(<X40)
440 (4%)
234 (2%)
Moving
Ahead
34%
5%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
20%
6%
36%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
190 (2%)
417 (3%)
585 (5%) 1,352 (11%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
708 (6%)
619 (5%)
700 (6%)
973 (8%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
783 (6%)
567 (5%)
463 (4%)
551 (5%)
Does Not
2,481 (20%) 835 (7%)
(<X40)
615 (5%)
345 (3%)
519 (5%) 1,292 (13%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Proficiency Category
Achievement Category
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
2015
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
30%
5%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
19%
8%
38%
38
MCA Reading Summary

2014
Exceeds
( X60)
141 (1%)
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
322 (3%)
521 (4%)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
787 (6%)
786 (6%)
803 (6%)
1169 (9%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
741 (6%)
541(4%)
578 (4%)
613 (5%)
948 (7%)
670 (5%)
469 (4%)
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
29%
4%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
21%
9%
37%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
91 (1%)
273 (2%)
469 (4%) 1,285 (11%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
769 (6%)
687 (6%)
735 (6%)
1,110 (9%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
683 (6%)
495 (4%)
505 (4%)
629 (5%)
Does Not
2,469 (20%) 813 (7%)
(<X40)
668 (6%)
443 (4%)
1343 (10%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Does Not
2592(20%)
(<X40)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
2015
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
30%
3%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
21%
9%
37%
39
2015 MCA Summary - African

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
6 (0%)
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
8 (1%)
16 (1%)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
63 (5%)
52 (4%)
59 (4%)
122 (9%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
75 (5%)
74 (5%)
63 (5%)
99 (7%)
383 (28%)
128 (9%)
94 (7%)
78 (6%)
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
18%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
20%
13%
48%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
0 (0%)
1 (0%)
9 (1%)
29 (2%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
45 (4%)
57 (5%)
63 (5%)
118 (9%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
73 (6%)
63 (5%)
52 (4%)
86 (7%)
348 (28%)
98 (8%)
117 (9%)
88 (7%)
45 (3%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Does Not
(<X40)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Does Not
(<X40)
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
18%
0%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
19%
16%
47%
40
2014 MCA Summary - African

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
0%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
1%
1%
Well
Above
(>0.5)
3%
3%
5%
9%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
6%
6%
5%
8%
Does Not
(<X40)
27%
11%
7%
4%
Moving
Ahead
19%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
19%
11%
50%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
0%
0%
1%
2%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
3%
4%
7%
11%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
6%
5%
6%
9%
Does Not
(<X40)
25%
8%
8%
6%
4%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
20%
0%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
22%
14%
44%
41
2015 MCA Summary African American

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
12 (0%)
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
18 (1%)
38 (1%)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
100 (3%)
105 (4%)
109 (4%)
169 (6%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
194 (7%)
157 (5%)
118 (4%)
139 (5%)
Does Not
(<X40)
995 (34%)
321 (11%)
246 (8%)
134 (5%)
Moving
Ahead
14%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
16%
13%
56%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
4 (0%)
18 (1%)
27 (1%)
79 (3%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
99 (3%)
115 (4%)
142 (5%)
216 (7%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
195 (6%)
125 (4%)
133 (4%)
179 (6%)
Does Not
(<X40)
995 (33%)
325 (11%)
214 (7%)
148 (5%)
96 (3%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
15%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
17%
12%
54%
42
2014 MCA Summary African American

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
0%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
1%
1%
Well
Above
(>0.5)
3%
3%
4%
6%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
6%
5%
5%
5%
Does Not
(<X40)
35%
12%
7%
4%
Moving
Ahead
14%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
16%
11%
58%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
0%
1%
1%
3%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
3%
3%
5%
7%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
6%
5%
5%
6%
Does Not
(<X40)
32%
11%
7%
5%
3%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
15%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
17%
12%
54%
43
2015 MCA Summary American Indian

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
2 (0%)
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
3 (1%)
3 (1%)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
19 (4%)
17 (3%)
18 (3%)
27 (5%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
49 (9%)
24 (5%)
17 (3%)
27 (5%)
170 (32%)
60 (11%)
45 (9%)
32 (6%)
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
12%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
15%
15%
58%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
1 (0%)
3 (1%)
8 (2%)
17 (3%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
12 (2%)
18 (3%)
15 (3%)
42 (8%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
36 (7%)
30 (6%)
32 (6%)
48 (9%)
133 (25%)
50 (10%)
49 (9%)
32 (6%)
13 (2%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Does Not
(<X40)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Does Not
(<X40)
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
16%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
21%
15%
47%
44
2014 MCA Summary American Indian

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
0%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
1%
1%
Well
Above
(>0.5)
2%
3%
3%
9%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
8%
5%
4%
4%
Does Not
(<X40)
34%
11%
8%
4%
Moving
Ahead
16%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
14%
12%
58%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
1%
2%
1%
2%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
3%
4%
3%
7%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
6%
5%
5%
5%
Does Not
(<X40)
34%
9%
7%
5%
3%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
14%
2%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
17%
12%
54%
45
2015 MCA Summary Asian

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
9 (1%)
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
28 (3%)
40 (5%)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
42 (5%)
57 (7%)
57 (7%)
98 (11%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
55 (6%)
41 (5%)
53 (6%)
48 (6%)
121 (14%)
51 (6%)
37 (4%)
12 (1%)
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
35%
4%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
23%
6%
31%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
5 (1%)
11 (1%)
20 (2%)
75 (9%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
48 (6%)
58 (7%)
51 (6%)
93 (11%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
48 (6%)
50 (6%)
53 (6%)
67 (8%)
159 (19%)
54 (6%)
41 (5%)
24 (3%)
106 (12%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Does Not
(<X40)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Does Not
(<X40)
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
28%
2%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
26%
8%
36%
46
2014 MCA Summary Asian

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
1%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
2%
4%
Well
Above
(>0.5)
5%
5%
6%
12%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
7%
6%
5%
7%
Does Not
(<X40)
16%
6%
4%
2%
Moving
Ahead
35%
3%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
22%
6%
35%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
1%
2%
3%
8%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
6%
5%
7%
10%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
8%
5%
5%
7%
Does Not
(<X40)
15%
7%
6%
5%
12%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
28%
3%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
23%
11%
35%
47
2015 MCA Summary Hispanic

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
12 (1%)
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
24 (1%)
46 (2%)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
84 (4%)
99 (4%)
139 (6%)
235 (10%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
162 (7%)
139 (6%)
127 (5%)
166 (7%)
Does Not
(<X40)
573 (25%)
203 (9%)
143 (6%)
65 (3%)
Moving
Ahead
23%
2%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
20%
9%
46%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
4 (0%)
7 (0%)
38 (2%)
73 (3%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
71 (3%)
89 (4%)
114 (5%)
239 (10%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
125 (5%)
122 (5%)
151 (6%)
159 (7%)
Does Not
(<X40)
594 (26%)
222 (10%)
203 (9%)
117 (5%)
121 (5%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
20%
0%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
20%
14%
46%
48
2014 MCA Summary Hispanic

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
0%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
1%
1%
Well
Above
(>0.5)
3%
4%
5%
11%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
7%
7%
6%
7%
Does Not
(<X40)
24%
9%
6%
4%
Moving
Ahead
23%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
20%
10%
46%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
0%
1%
1%
3%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
3%
4%
4%
9%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
6%
5%
7%
7%
Does Not
(<X40)
26%
11%
8%
6%
5%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
17%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
21%
14%
48%
49
2015 MCA Summary White

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
149 (4%)
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
336 (8%)
442 (11%)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
400 (10%)
289 (7%)
318 (8%)
322 (8%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
247 (6%)
132 (3%)
84 (2%)
72 (2%)
Does Not
(<X40)
239 (6%)
72 (2%)
50 (1%)
24 (1%)
Moving
Ahead
50%
12%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
20%
2%
17%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
77 (2%)
233 (6%)
367 (9%)
1012 (24%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
493 (12%)
350 (8%)
350 (8%)
402 (10%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
206 (5%)
105 (3%)
84 (2%)
90 (2%)
Does Not
(<X40)
240 (6%)
64 (2%)
44 (1%)
34 (1%)
971 (23%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
51%
7%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
25%
2%
15%
50
2014 MCA Summary White

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
3%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
7%
10%
Well
Above
(>0.5)
8%
6%
8%
10%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
5%
3%
3%
2%
Does Not
(<X40)
7%
2%
1%
1%
Moving
Ahead
52%
10%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
19%
2%
17%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
3%
6%
9%
23%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
11%
10%
8%
10%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
5%
2%
2%
1%
Does Not
(<X40)
6%
2%
1%
1%
24%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
50%
8%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
24%
2%
15%
51
2015 MCA Summary English Learners

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
2 (0%)
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
4 (0%)
12 (0%)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
37 (1%)
71 (3%)
102 (4%)
249 (9%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
166 (6%)
154 (6%)
156 (6%)
232 (8%)
Does Not
(<X40)
880 (31%)
325 (12%)
233 (8%)
136 (5%)
Moving
Ahead
14%
0%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
18%
13%
55%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
0 (0%)
2 (0%)
1 (0%)
11 (0%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
5 (0%)
28 (1%)
49 (2%)
171 (6%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
107 (4%)
137 (5%)
160 (6%)
235 (9%)
Does Not
(<X40)
904 (34%)
334 (12%)
324 (12%)
215 (8%)
35 (1%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
9%
0%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
16%
20%
55%
52
2014 MCA Summary English Learners

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
0%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
0%
0%
Well
Above
(>0.5)
1%
2%
4%
9%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
5%
6%
6%
9%
Does Not
(<X40)
30%
12%
8%
5%
Moving
Ahead
15%
0%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
18%
13%
53%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
0%
0%
0%
0%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
1%
1%
3%
5%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
3%
4%
7%
9%
Does Not
(<X40)
32%
14%
11%
9%
2%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
8%
0%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
18%
21%
54%
53
2015 MCA Summary Special Education

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
4 (0%)
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
21 (1%)
26 (2%)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
50 (3%)
34 (2%)
32 (2%)
57 (4%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
54 (3%)
40 (3%)
42 (3%)
54 (3%)
635 (41%)
184 (12%)
164 (11%)
101 (7%)
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
11%
2%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
12%
17%
59%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
2 (0%)
14 (1%)
14 (1%)
45 (3%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
34 (2%)
35 (2%)
45 (3%)
83 (5%)
Partially
(X40 to X50)
57 (4%)
38 (2%)
37 (2%)
74 (5%)
647 (42%)
181 (12%)
143 (9%)
110 (7%)
50 (3%)
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Does Not
(<X40)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Does Not
(<X40)
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
12%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
12%
16%
59%
54
2014 MCA Summary Special Education

Math
Exceeds
( X60)
1%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
1%
2%
Well
Above
(>0.5)
2%
2%
2%
5%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
4%
2%
2%
4%
Does Not
(<X40)
45%
13%
8%
5%
Moving
Ahead
12%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
10%
13%
63%
Growth Category
Above
(Above 0
Below
(-0.5 to 0)
to 0.5)
Well
Above
(>0.5)
Exceeds
( X60)
1%
0%
1%
3%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
2%
3%
2%
5%
Partially
(X40 to X50)
3%
2%
3%
5%
Does Not
(<X40)
39%
14%
9%
7%
4%
Meets
(X50 to X
60)
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Well
Below
(<-0.5)
Reading
Moving
Ahead
Ahead,
but below
average
growth
12%
1%
Borderline
Behind,
but above
average
growth
Falling
Behind
13%
16%
58%
55

MPS Academic Progress Report

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

MPS Academic Progress Report

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

2015-2016 RAP Slides:

Leading and Lagging Indicators

#10: Student Persistence Rating

African American American Indian

Near the top

Less than most

STUDENT TRACKER FALL ENROLLMENT

STUDENT TRACKER FIRST YEAR ENROLLMENT

STUDENT TRACKER TWO YEAR ENROLLMENT

STUDENT TRACKER RETENTION

STUDENT TRACKER INSTITUTION TYPE

Pct Students Enrolled in College Within First Year of Graduation from HS

STUDENT TRACKER INSTITUTION TYPE by SPECIAL POPULATIONS

STUDENT TRACKER TOP PLACEMENT SITES

St. Paul Col

St. Catherine St. Catherine

U of M - Twin U of M Twin U of M - Twin U of M - Twin U of M - Twin U of M - Twin U of M Twin U of M - Twin

Normandale St. Catherine

St. Paul Col

St. Olaf Col

St. Paul Col

St. Paul Col

St. Catherine U of St.

Percent Attendance by Ethnicity

Percent Attendance by English Learner

Percent Attendance by Special

Percent Attendance by Free/ReducedPrice Lunch Status

GPA and Proficiency

Avg. GPA and Suspensions

Reading Proficiency and Suspensions

Math Proficiency and Suspensions

Reading Growth and Suspensions

Math Growth and Suspensions

State 2013 (MCA-III)

#1: Reading proficiency by race/ethnicity

#1: Reading proficiency by student group

Non Special Ed.

F/R Price Lunch

Not Eligible for F/R

State 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III)

#2: Math proficiency by race/ethnicity

#2: Math proficiency by student group

Non-ELL Students Special Education

Non Special Ed.

F/R Price Lunch

Not Eligible for

MPS 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III)

MPS 2014 (MCA-III)

MPS 2015 (MCA-III)

Four-Year Graduation Rate Trends

Class of 2013 (AYP Year 2014)

Class of 2014 (AYP Year 2015)

#7: % of students attending school 95% of the time

Average Daily Attendance

AFRICAN AMER (NON ENG

GR9 GR10 GR11 GR12

2015 MCA-III Math Proficiency by Attendance Grade

#8: % of Advanced Placement (AP) and International

Percent of Exams Earning a Credit-Eligible Score

#9: % of students scoring a 21 or higher on the ACT - overall

2015 MCA-III Math

MCA-III Math and Reading District wide Proficiency 2015

2015 MCA-III Reading

#16 & #17: % of students meeting or exceeding expected