Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Name of reviewer:
Carefully read the paper. Comment on the paper as needed in addition to filling out this evaluation form. Give this evaluation
form back to the writer and discuss your feedback with him or her.
Exceeds
Criteria
Circle elements that need work
Meets
Criteria
At
Times
Meets
Criteria
Seldom
Meets
Criteria
Workshop
Was the writer present at the writing workshop with a typed draft and did he or she participate in reviewing other papers? (10
pts)
Name of reviewer:
Carefully read the paper. Comment on the paper as needed in addition to filling out this evaluation form. Give this evaluation
form back to the writer and discuss your feedback with him or her.
Exceeds
Criteria
Circle elements that need work
Meets
Criteria
At
Times
Meets
Criteria
Seldom
Meets
Criteria
Title
Is the title informative and interesting?
Summary
Does the paper represent the original article accurately and fairly? Is the
summary direct and concise? Does the summary remain objective and
neutral?
Does the paper use the writers own words to express the original authors
ideas? Does the paper distinguish the writers ideas from the original authors
ideas by using attributive tags?
Strong Response
Do the opening sentences provide needed contextual information and then
express the overall thesis?
Does the paper analyze the articles audience, purpose, genre, style? Does the
paper analyze the articles logos, ethos, and pathos? Its rhetorical
effectiveness and persuasiveness?
MLA Style and Format
Does the paper follow MLA format? Does the paper cite and document with
parenthetical references and a Works Cited page in MLA style?
Style and Mechanics
Does the paper employ Standard Academic English (SAE), including grammar
and punctuation? Are sentences and paragraphs well constructed and clear?
Is diction (word choice) appropriate and thoughtful? Is the paper well
organized?
Summary
Workshop
Was the writer present at the writing workshop with a typed draft and did he or she participate in reviewing other papers? (10
pts)
Name of reviewer:
Carefully read the paper. Comment on the paper as needed in addition to filling out this evaluation form. Give this evaluation
form back to the writer and discuss your feedback with him or her.
Exceeds
Criteria
Circle elements that need work
Meets
Criteria
At
Times
Meets
Criteria
Seldom
Meets
Criteria
Critical Preface
Does the preface show the research problem to be significant, provocative,
and researchable? Does the preface overview the kinds of items in the
bibliography?
MLA Style & Citations
Does the paper use MLA style format and page numbers? Are all citations in
perfect MLA documentation style? Are any quotations properly attributed
with parenthetical references?
Summaries
Does the paper summarize the assigned number of scholarly sources in an
accurate and fair manner? Are summaries direct and concise? Do summaries
remain objective and neutral?
Evaluations
Does the paper analyze sources in terms of genre, audience, purpose, and
rhetorical effectiveness?
Style and Mechanics
Does the paper employ Standard Academic English (SAE), including grammar
and punctuation? Are sentences and paragraphs well constructed and clear?
Is diction (word choice) appropriate and thoughtful? Is the paper well
organized?
Style and Mechanics
Does the paper employ Standard Academic English (SAE), including grammar
and punctuation? Are sentences and paragraphs well constructed and clear?
Is diction (word choice) appropriate and thoughtful? Is the paper well
organized?
Summary
Workshop
Was the writer present at the writing workshop with a typed draft and did he or she participate in reviewing other papers? (10
pts)
Name of reviewer:
Carefully read the paper. Comment on the paper as needed in addition to filling out this evaluation form. Give this evaluation
form back to the writer and discuss your feedback with him or her.
Exceeds
Criteria
Circle elements that need work
Workshop
Was the writer present at the writing workshop with a typed draft and did he
or she participate in reviewing other papers? (10 pts)
Meets
Criteria
At
Times
Meets
Criteria
Seldom
Meets
Criteria