Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
R. Shankar Subramanian
Clift, Grace, and Weber (Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, Academic Press, 1978) provide
correlations based on experimental data that can be used to calculate the drag coefficient
on a disk moving parallel to its axis over a limited range of values of the Reynolds
number. I have reproduced their results below for your use.
The definitions of the Reynolds number and the drag coefficient are given below.
d eV
Re =
CD =
Here,
2D
a 2V 2
is its viscosity.
The symbol D stands for the drag on the sphere. The radius of the disk is
thickness is H , leading to the following result for the equivalent diameter d e .
d e = ( 6a H )
2
a and
its
1
3
Drag Coefficient
For
Re 0.01 ,
CD =
64 Re
1+
Re 2
For
CD =
64
1 + 10 x )
(
Re
where
For 1.5 < Re 133 ,
CD =
64
1 + 0.138Re0.792
Re
Clift, Grace, and Weber state that when vortex shedding begins,
to
Re ,
1.17
for
CD becomes insensitive
Re > 1,000 ,
satisfies 0.1 < ReT < 100 . For calculating the terminal settling velocity in this range
of values of the Reynolds number, the drag coefficient correlations given earlier can be
used iteratively. The steady motion gives way to more complicated tumbling motion for
ReT > 100 , even though the steady motion persists to higher ReT up to about 172
when the moment of inertia of the disk is relatively small. It appears that a parameter
1
3
1
3,
CD Re the amplitude
2
T
of the oscillation increases and the disk moves in a succession of curved arcs, a motion
1
2
called glide-tumble. At even higher CD ReT 3 , the disk executes a tumbling motion,
rotating continually about a diameter and following a trajectory that is nearly rectilinear,
but not vertical.
When the disk executes unsteady motion, the drag correlations for steady drag
cannot be used. More information regarding this situation can be found in page 149 of
the book by Clift, Grace, and Weber.