Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
www.elsevier.com/locate/biotechadv
Plant Biotechnology Department, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan
b
Research Center for Environmental Genomics, Kobe University, Rokkodaicho 1-1, Nada, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
c
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council Secretariat, 1-2-1 Kasumigaseki Chiyodaku, Tokyo 100-8950, Japan
Received 21 August 2006; received in revised form 3 October 2006; accepted 12 October 2006
Available online 24 October 2006
Abstract
Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450s) metabolize herbicides to produce mainly non-phytotoxic metabolites. Although
rice plants endogenously express multiple P450 enzymes, transgenic plants expressing other P450 isoforms might show improved
herbicide resistance or reduce herbicide residues. Mammalian P450s metabolizing xenobiotics are reported to show a broad and
overlapping substrate specificity towards lipophilic foreign chemicals, including herbicides. These P450s are ideal for enhancing
xenobiotic metabolism in plants. A human P450, CYP1A1, metabolizes various herbicides with different structures and modes of
herbicide action. We introduced human CYP1A1 into rice plants, and the transgenic rice plants showed broad cross-resistance
towards various herbicides and metabolized them. The introduced CYP1A1 enhanced the metabolism of chlorotoluron and
norflurazon. The herbicides were metabolized more rapidly in the transgenic rice plants than in non-transgenic controls. Transgenic
rice plants expressing P450 might be useful for reducing concentrations of various chemicals in the environment.
2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Cytochrome P450 (CYP); Xenobiotic metabolism; Herbicide resistance; Atrazine; Chlorotoluron; Norflurazon; Phytoremediation;
Detoxification
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plant and animal P450s for xenobiotic metabolism . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Substrate specificity of CYP1A1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transgenic rice plants expressing CYP1A1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Herbicide resistance of soil-grown transgenic rice plants expressing CYP1A1
Use of CYP1A1 rice for direct seeding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Use of transgenic rice plants for phytoremediation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 29 838 8374; fax: +81 29 838 8397.
E-mail address: shiwak@affrc.go.jp (H. Kawahigashi).
1
Present address: Faculty of Life Science and Biotechnology, Fukuyama University, Gakuencho 1, Fukuyama, Hiroshima, 729-0292, Japan.
0734-9750/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.10.002
76
76
77
78
80
81
82
76
8. Concluding remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
1. Introduction
Herbicides are laborsaving means of improving crop
yield and quality, because weed infestation reduces crop
yields and decreases market prices (Lockhart et al.,
1990). In addition, the proper use of herbicides
conserves soil and moisture, whereas mechanical weed
control results in loss of soil moisture and increased
erosion.
Herbicides are removed from the environment by
chemical degradation or degradation by bacteria and
plants. The metabolism of herbicides in higher plants
comprises three main phases-conversion (Phase I),
conjugation (Phase II), and compartmentalization (Phase
III) (Hatzios, 1997). In Phase I, hydrophobic herbicides
are converted to mainly less lipophilic metabolites
through oxidation, peroxidation, or reduction by cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450s). This conversion
usually produces less toxic metabolites, but some proherbicides are activated (Ohkawa et al., 1999; WerckReichhart et al., 2000). In Phase II, herbicides or their
Phase I metabolites are directly conjugated with glutathione, sugars, or amino acids to produce water-soluble
compounds that are easily eliminated. Finally, in Phase
III, conjugated metabolites are further converted to reduce
mobility, and then deposited in the vacuoles or cell walls
of plants (Hatzios, 1997).
Weeds have developed resistance to the majority of
known herbicide chemical classes and mechanisms of
action (Beckie et al., 2000; WeedScience.org, 2005).
Indeed, over 290 biotypes of herbicide-resistant weeds
have been reported in agricultural fields and gardens
worldwide (Beckie et al., 2000; WeedScience.org,
2005). This resistance can result from modification of
the target site or enhanced detoxification, as well as
alterations in uptake, translocation, and compartmentalization of the herbicide (Ohkawa et al., 1999).
The two primary mechanisms of tolerance in agricultural crops are modification of the target site and
development of enhanced detoxification (Putwain,
1990). Two enzyme systems play major roles in the
increased degradation of herbicides: P450s and glutathione S-transferases (Ohkawa et al., 1999). P450s
mainly catalyze monooxygenation of lipophilic, xenobiotic compounds, including herbicides. This enzyme
77
Table 1
Herbicide resistance of CYP1A1 rice plants in germination test
HRAC
group a
A
C1
C2
F1
K1
K2
K3
L
N
Herbicide
CYP1A1
Yeast microsome
Transgenic rice
M b
%c
M d
10
88
0.2
Atrazine
Simazine
100
20
13
41
100
100
=
=
Chlorotoluron
Diuron
Methabenzthiazuron
100
100
100
84
99
46
100
150
200
++
+
=
Norflurazon
100
86
Amiprophos-methyl
Pendimethalin
200
100
9
66
2.5
20
++
++
Chlorpropham
100
27
7.5
++
Mefenacet
150
19
2.5
++
Isoxaben
10
11
100
2.5
Quizalofop-ethyl
Pyributicarb
1.25
Resistance e
++
++
78
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of atrazine, chlorotoluron, norflurazon, and mefenacet. Bold black arrows indicate the proposed sites of N-demethylation
or hydroxylation by CYP1A1 in a yeast microsome system in vitro (Inui et al., 2001).
79
Fig. 2. T-DNA region of pIES1A1 plasmid used to express the human CYP1A1 gene. RB, right border; LB, left border; NOS, nopaline synthase
promoter; NT, nopaline synthase terminator; NPTII, neomycin phosphotransferase II; 35S, cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter; E7,
CaMV 35S promoter with seven-enhancer region (-290 to -90) from CaMV 35S promoter; AMV-5UTR, alfalfa mosaic virus 5-untranslated region;
HPT, hygromycin B phosphotransferase.
Fig. 3. Phytotoxicity of various herbicides toward transgenic rice plants expressing CYP1A1. CYP1A1 rice plants showed normal growth, but nontransgenic rice plants did not. In the case of norflurazon, non-transgenic rice plants showed white shoots because of inhibition of carotenoid synthesis.
Germination tests were carried out in test tubes (diameter, 2.5 cm; height, 15 cm) each with 10 mL of MS solid medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962)
containing 7.5 M chlorpropham, 2.5 M mefenacet, 20 M pendimethalin, or 0.5 M norflurazon. Four seeds of transgenic and non-transgenic
(control) rice plants were embedded in the medium and cultured at 27 C for 7 to 14 days under 16 h of light (photon flux density 40 mol m 2 s 1).
Lane C, Nipponbare without herbicide (control); lane N, Nipponbare with herbicide; lanes 1A1, CYP1A1 rice plants with herbicide.
80
Fig. 4. Herbicide resistance of CYP1A1 rice plants to chlorotoluron, diuron, and methabenzthiazuron. CYP1A1 rice plants grew well, but nontransgenic rice plants were severely damaged by the photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides. Five 7-day-old plants were transplanted to glass pots
(diameter, 9 cm; height, 19 cm) with 500 mL water and 500 g of Kumiai-Ryujyou-Baido K soil (Kureha Chemical, Tokyo, Japan). Transgenic plants
and non-transgenic Nipponbare plants were grown in a greenhouse at 28 C during the day and 25 C at night for 2 weeks. We then added each
herbicide into the water. Growth was noted after 2 weeks. (A) Resistance to chlorotoluron; 3.9 mg chlorotoluron (twice that used in cornfields) was
applied. (B) Resistance to diuron; 2.1 mg diuron (twice that used in fruit tree orchards) was applied. (C) Resistance to methabenzthiazuron; 3.7 mg
methabenzthiazuron (twice that used in cornfields) was applied.
81
82
Fig. 6. Time course of metabolism of chlorotoluron (A) and norflurazon (B) by control (Nipponbare) and CYP1A1 transgenic rice plants. CYP1A1
rice plants decreased the concentrations of both herbicides in the culture medium quicker than did the non-transgenic Nipponbare rice plants. Rice
seeds were embedded in MS solid medium and incubated at 27 C for 6 days under 16 h of light (photon flux density 40 mol m 2 s 1). Individual 6day-old plants were transferred to 3 mL of Hyponex 5-10-5 (Hyponex, Osaka, Japan) solution containing 40 000 dpm 14C-chlorotoluron or 14Cnorflurazon at 10 M in a test tube (diameter, 2.5 cm; height, 15 cm). The plants were incubated under 24 h of light (40 mol m 2 s 1), and the culture
medium was sampled on days 1, 3, and 6 of incubation. The culture medium was dried and dissolved in 90% methanol. Then 2000-dpm aliquots of
culture medium were applied to the lanes of a silica gel 60F254 thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The developing
solvents were chloroform:ethanol (9:1, v/v) for chlorotoluron and dichloromethane:methanol (98:2, v/v) for norflurazon. Radioactivity was measured
in an FLA-2000 Bio-Imaging Analyzer (Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). These values are the averages of three independent experiments.
83
84
Mougin C, Cabanne F, Canivenc M-C, Scalla R. Hydroxylation and Ndemethylation of chlorotoluron by wheat microsomal enzymes.
Plant Sci 1990;66:195203.
Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay
with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 1962;15:47397.
Nebert DW, Russell DW. Clinical importance of the cytochromes
P450. Lancet 2002;360:115562.
Nelson D. Cytochrome P450 Homepage; 2004. Available at http://
drnelson.utmem.edu/CytochromeP450.html (Accessed June 10,
2005).
Nelson DR, Schuler MA, Paquette SM, Werck-Reichhart D, Bak S.
Comparative genomics of rice and arabidopsis. Analysis of 727
cytochrome P450 genes and pseudogenes from a monocot and a
dicot. Plant Physiol 2004;135:75672.
Nouyaku Hand Book Hensyu Iinkai. Nouyaku hand book. Tokyo,
Japan: Nippon Syokubutsu Boueki Kyoukai; 2001.
Ohkawa H, Tsujii H, Ohkawa Y. The use of cytochrome P450 genes to
introduce herbicide tolerance in crops. Pestic Sci 1999;55:18.
Pierrel MA, Batard Y, Kazmaier M, Mignotte-Vieux C, Durst F,
Werck-Reichhart D. Catalytic properties of the plant cytochrome
P450 CYP73 expressed in yeast. Substrate specificity of a
cinnamate hydroxylase. Eur J Biochem 1994;224:83544.
Putwain PD. The resistance of plants to herbicides. In: Hance R, Holly
K, editors. Weed control handbook: principles. Oxford: Blackwell;
1990. p. 21742.
Relyea RA. The impact of insecticide and herbicide on the biodiversity
and productivity of aquatic communities. Ecol Appl 2005;15:
61827.
Robineau T, Batard Y, Nedelkina S, Cabello-Hurtado F, LeRet M,
Sorokine O, et al. The chemically inducible plant cytochrome P450
CYP76B1 actively metabolizes phenylureas and other xenobiotics.
Plant Physiol 1998;118:104956.
Ryan PJ, Gross D, Owen WJ, Laanio TL. The metabolism of
chlortoluron, diuron, and CGA 43 057 in tolerant and susceptible
plants. Pestic Biohem Physiol 1981;16:21321.
Saito K, Noji M, Ohmori S, Imai Y, Murakoshi I. Integration and
expression of a rabbit liver cytochrome P-450 gene in transgenic
Nicotiana tabacum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:70415.
Salt DE, Blaylock M, Kumar NP, Dushenkov V, Ensley BD, Chet I, et al.
Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from
the environment using plants. Biotechnology (N Y) 1995;13:46874.
Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I. Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant
Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1998;49:64368.
Schnoor JL, Licht LA, McCutcheon SC, Wolfe NL, Carreira LH.
Phytoremediation of organic and nutrient contaminants. Environ
Sci Technol 1995;29:318A23A.