Police Facility Work Session

Salem Police Facility
Preliminary Findings Study
January 21, 2016
T
F
A
R
PRESENTATION TO
CITY COUNCIL

T
F
Officer/1000 Residents Served
NATIONAL CAPITOL CITY EXAMPLES
SALEM PROPOSED
SALEM EXISTING
SALT LAKE CITY,
UTAH
Population: 178,000
DES MOINES,
IOWA
Population: 194,000
BATON ROUGE,
LOUISIANA
Population: 222,000
RICHMOND,
VIRGINA
MADISON,
WISCONSIN
A
R
D
Population: 221,000
Population:122,000
TALLAHASSEE,
FLORIDA
Population:158,000
Population based on US Census Bureau Data
534 SWORN OFFICERS

3.0
376 SWORN OFFICERS

1.94
Population: 193,000
TOPEKA, KANSAS
January 21, 2016
668 SWORN OFFICERS

3.0
750 SWORN OFFICERS

3.89
467 SWORN OFFICERS

2.11
296 SWORN OFFICERS
2.43
355 SWORN OFFICERS

2.25
.5
1.5
2.5
2

Population: 160,000
MEDFORD
Population: 70,677
NAMPA, ID
Population: 86,518
REDDING, CA
Population: 91,119
KEIZER
190 SWORN OFFICERS

1.18
A
R
103 SWORN OFFICERS

1.47
137 SWORN OFFICERS

1.59
D
Population: 37,064
SALEM (Existing)
Population:160,000
SALEM
Population:210,000
(PROPOSED, 2045)
T
F
Officer/1000 Residents Served
NORTHWEST EXAMPLES
EUGENE
January 21, 2016
102 SWORN OFFICERS
1.12
38 SWORN OFFICERS
1.02
187 SWORN OFFICERS

1.16
260 SWORN OFFICERS

1.23
.5
1.5
2.5
Population based on US Census Bureau Data

SALEM
PROPOSED
SALEM
EXISTING
INTERNATIONAL
ASSOCIATION of
CHIEFS of POLICE
STANDARD
46,500 SF
103 Officers
NAMPA, ID
KEIZER
A
R
116,800 SF
190 Officers
MEDFORD
119,000 SF
137 Officers
(Remodel of existing facility)
D
28,800 SF
38 Officers
SALEM (Existing)
48,000 SF
187 Officers
SALEM (Proposed)
148,000 SF
260 Officers
T
F
Square Foot/Officer
NORTHWEST EXAMPLES
EUGENE
January 21, 2016
200
400
600
800
1000

BUILDING NEEDS
PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATION
Chief/Administration Staff, Command Staff,

Conference Room
SUPPORT
Fleet Vehicles, Planning & Research, Personnel &

Training, Evidence, Garage Spaces, Jail Transport, Sally Port, Evidence, Records, Etc.
35
INVESTIGATIONS
Criminal, Street Crimes, Youth Services,

Crime Lab, Cadets, Volunteers, Crime Prevention, Etc.
47
PATROL
General Patrol, Downtown Bicycle, Traffic,

Domestic Violence, K-9, Shift Command,
Etc.
138
WVCC
T
F
2015 STAFF
A
R
Information Technology, Willamette Valley

Communications Center (Regional E911
PSAP & EOC)
77
2045 STAFF
2045 SF
12
7,069
50
31,215
60
29,801
166
26,352
100
24,904
NON-DIVISIONAL
Locker Rooms, Toilet & Showers, Exercise

Room, Break Room, Storage, Custodial,
Armory Training Room, Etc.
21,241
FACILITIES
Ancillary, Site, Public Space
7,459
305
388
187
260
TOTAL STAFF
SWORN OFFICERS
January 21, 2016
- Hours of operations observation and patrol

ride-alongs lead to customized
understanding of needs
- 29 discrete interview groups of police staff
across specialty divisions
- Development of standardized office and
workstation sizes, organized by rank
- Growth projections utilizing population data,
statistical information, and IACP
data
- Heavy police leadership participation
- DLR Group Experience with Over 50 Police
Facilities, Firm & Staff
148,041

January 21, 2016
PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION
T
F
based on in-depth review (DLR Group)
Based on the Council direction in May 2015, a National Expert in Police Facilities was
selected (DLR Group).
Based on their interviews of 29 distinct groups within the Police Department a program
for the new facility was derived.
Growth Projections utilizing population data, statistical information, and IACP data were
used in this development.
A
R
- DLR GROUP RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

ADMINISTRATION
7,069
SUPPORT
31,215
INVESTIGATIONS
29,801
PATROL
26,352
WVCC
NON-DIVISIONAL
FACILITIES
TOTAL
24,904
21,241
BLUE RIBBON TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS

- Focus on the Police Facility (only)
- Build to serve community for minimum of 40 years
- Include 9-1-1 communications dispatch center
- Centrally locate, as close as possible to City Hall
- Meet functional needs of Police
- Be priced within current range of cost per square
foot of recently constructed police facilities
OPTIONS FOR REDUCING BUILDING SIZE

- Remove large program elements
(e.g. WVCC)

- Adjust the current growth assumptions

(30 year growth @ 2.4 officers per year average)

- Unilateral reduction of square footage based on percentage
7,459
148,041
Totals in Building Gross Square Footage Based on 30 Year

Projection of Departmental Growth
6

January 21, 2016
T
F
Conduct Site Evaluation (IACP)
Careful consideration must be given to the size, location and flexibility of any existing or potential facility site. Site selection determines the maximum
footprint or size of the facility and must, therefore, meet all space needs requirements. Site location determines accessibility of police facility to the
public, police officers, and other government staff.
A
R
Site evaluation and selection must be carefully considered whether exploring the possibility of renovation of an existing facility, acquisition of an
adaptive re-use facility or new construction. According to real estate investors, a primary rule in selecting property is location. This is also true for
police facilities. There are many essential components of site evaluation:

Cost of land

Cost of site development

Size and shape of site

Potential for multiple uses

Public access to site (vehicular and pedestrian)

Visibility and views

Proximity to other governmental functions

Response to citizens needs and concerns a neighborhood
context

Travel and mileage issues

Positioning of new facility on site
Security

Noise and traffic impact

Expansion possibilities

Former use of identified land

Possible ground contamination

Possibility of locating artifacts during site preparation &
excavation
Zoning

Utilities / easements

Topography / geotechnical / soils

Bodies of water / wetlands / floodplain / stormwater control
International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Police Facility Planning Guidelines: A Desk Reference for Law Enforcement Executives

January 21, 2016
Site Categories
T
F
IACP SITE EVALUATION CRITERIA
RECOMMENDED SALEM SITE CATEGORIES
Cost of land
Cost of site development
Size and shape of site
Utilities / easements
Topography / geotechnical / soils
Proximity to other governmental functions
Travel and mileage issues
Former use of identified land
Response to citizens needs and concerns a neighborhood context

Noise and traffic impact
Possible ground contamination

Possibility of locating artifacts during site preparation & excavation
Risk
Potential for multiple uses
Redevelopment Catalyst
Visibility and views
Public access to site (vehicular and pedestrian)
Positioning of new facility on site
A
R
Expansion possibilities
Bodies of water / wetlands / floodplain / stormwater control
Zoning
based on IACP
Property Acquisition and

Development Cost
Central Location, Proximity to

Government Services
Service to City
Ease of Acquisition
Neighborhood Compatibility
Community Visibility
Public Access
Co-Location Potential
Urban Renewal Assistance Potential
8

January 21, 2016
T
F
Re-ordered based on Sub-committee

meeting, Nov. 16, 2015
A. Central Location, Proximity to Other Government Services (Proximity to other Governmental Functions)

- Is the site located conveniently for efficient access to and from the Civic Center, DA, Court, County Offices?
- Is the site central to the City?
B. Property Acquisition and Development Cost of Land, Cost of Site Development, Size & Shape of Site, Topography, Utilities)

Size, Shape, Utility & Transportation Infrastructure, Complexity. Includes Cost for Parking.

A
R
- Is access in and out of the site easy for police to get to all parts of the City?
D. Community Visibility (Visibility and Views)

- Does the building provide a presence in its location?
E. Co-Location Potential - Room for Future Growth - (Positioning of New Facility on Site, Bodies of Water, Wetlands, Added Ancillary Facilities.)

- Is the site large enough to accommodate additional services? - e.g. Court.
F. Neighborhood Compatibility (Responds to Citizens Needs and Concerns - a Neighborhood Context, Noise and Traffic Impact)

- Does the Police Facility add to the neighborhood or detract?
G. Ease of Acquisition - Multiple Parcels/Property Owners, Current Use (Cost of Site Development, Former use of Land Identified)

- How easy would it be to purchase the property?

based on IACP
LOCATION
COST
- Is the size and shape of the site conducive to a standard layout of a building, parking, or associated structures?
- Are there off-site improvements that would potentially be required?
- What does the property cost to acquire?
C. Service to the City (Travel Mileage and Usage)

Site Categories
SITE SUITABILITY
LOCATION
SITE SUITABILITY
LOCATION
COST
- Are there multiple parcels to purchase and combine?

- Are there current uses that would need to be displaced or relocated as a result of the acquisition?
H. Public Access (Public Access to Site - Vehicular and Pedestrian)

- How easy is it for the public to get to the site?
I. Redevelopment Catalyst (Potential for Multiple Uses, Zoning)

- Will this site provide a boost to the neighborhood and spur on other development?
SITE SUITABILITY
LOCATION
J. Risk - Environmental, Permitting, Archeology (Possible Ground Contamination, Possibility of Locating Artifacts)

- Are there any known or potential issues regarding the previous use of the site or adjacent properties?
COST
K. Urban Renewal Assistance Potential (Zoning)

- Is the site within an URA that has funds available for use in site acquisition?
COST


Council Direction (May 2015)
City of Salem Urban Development Site Search
Local Real Estate Professional Input
Council Sub-Committee Input on Site Selection Criteria
January 21, 2016
Site Selection Rationale
T
F
A
R
30 Total Sites Considered
Based on cursory review, using site location, shape, acreage, and how the program/size
fits and can be applied relative to cost, the 30 sites were reduced to 8.
8 Sites Selected for Scoring and Further Review
10

January 21, 2016
Site Proximity Map
T
F
29
A
R
17
16
15
13
11
CITY
HALL
SITE PROXIMITY MAP
3
4
14
12
10
1 MILE RADIUS
24
2 MILE RADIUS
19
20
23
26
22
21
25
27
POTENTIAL SITES
11
22
33
44
55
66
77
88
99
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
3 MILE RADIUS
18
30 Sites Considered
28 30
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
COMMERCIAL ST.
(CITY OWNED LOT)
MISSION & COMMERCIAL
(LESLIE)
605 COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL & KEARNEY
COMMERCIAL & BUSH
COMMERCIAL & STATE
STATE & CHURCH
OLD WELLS FARGO
COMMERCIAL & CENTER
FORMER S.J.
RITE-AID
CHURCH & UNION (DOE)
COMMERCIAL &
DIVISION PROPERTY
(OBRIEN)
825 LIBERTY ST.
DOWNTOWN STORAGE
COMMERCIAL & D ST.
COMMERCIAL & MARKET
STATE ST. & 18TH
16TH & MCGILCHRIST
22ND & MCGILCHRIST
SALMON RUN VACANT LAND
25TH ST. SE
25TH & MISSION
STATE HOSP. N. CAMPUS
MADRONA & 25TH
HAWTHORNE & MILL CR.
FAIRVIEW INDUSTRIAL
SALEM AIRPORT PARCEL
PORTLAND ROAD
(EPPING)
2150 TURNER RD. SE
11

January 21, 2016
Site Proximity Map
T
F
29
A
R
17
16
15
13
11
CITY
HALL
SITE PROXIMITY MAP
3
4
14
12
10
1 MILE RADIUS
2 MILE RADIUS
18
19
24
20
23
26
21
27
POTENTIAL SITES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
3 MILE RADIUS
22
25
8 Sites Further Analyzed
28 30
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
12

January 21, 2016
ST.
T
F
+
+
+
+
PROS:
+
+
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
TOTAL:
20
6
10
10.5
3
13.5
10.5
12
5
5
5
100.5
SITE 2 - COMMERCIAL & LESLIE

+
feet
meters
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
TOTAL:
HIGH DEVELOPMENT
COST
SMALL SITE
20
4
18
13.5
3
10.5
3
15
5
4
1
97
PROS:
+ Central Location
+ Service to City
+ Community
Visibility
+ Public Access
1000
400
CONS:
- High

Development

Cost
- Small Site
- Multiple Parcels
- No Urban Renewal
Potential
SCORING SHOWN USING WEIGHTED VALUES
+
+
+
+
HIGH DEVELOPMENT
ISICOST
ON
SMALL SITE
ST.
MULTIPLE PARCELS
NO URBAN RENEWAL
POTENTIAL
+
+
+
+
NE
CENTRAL LOCATION
COMMUNITY VISIBILITY
LARGE SITE
NEIGHBORHOOD
COMPATIBILITY
EASE OF ACQUISITION
PUBLIC ACCESS
REDEVELOPMENT
CATALYST
URBAN RENEWAL
POTENTIAL
CONS:
SITE 13 - COMMERCIAL & DIVISION

(OBRIEN)
CONS:
PROS:
+ Central Location
+ Neighborhood
Compatibility
CONS:
- High Development
Cost
- Small Site
CENTRAL LOCATION
NEIGHBORHOOD
COMPATIBILITY
PUBLIC ACCESS
DIV
E
T. N
SITE
LIBERTY & HIG

(DT STORA
ADDRESS:
985 BROADW
245,687 SF (5.4
NUMBER OF P
ZONING DESIG
DISTANCE FRO
CITY HALL
PROS:
CENTRAL LOCATION
SERVICE TO CITY
COMMUNITY VISIBILITY
PUBLIC ACCESS
CONS:
SITE 13
DIVISION &
COMMERCIAL
(OBRIEN)
POTENTIAL
ADDRESS:
SETBACK
742 COMMERCIAL ST.
186,437 SF (4.27 ACRES)
NUMBER OF PARCELS: 6
ZONING DESIGNATION: CB
DISTANCE FROM
CITY HALL: .75 MILES
RC
IAL
PROS:
LIB
N ST. S
SITE 1 - CITY OWNED COMMERCIAL

ST. PROPERTY (WINDOWS TO THE WEST)
CO
M
ME
ER
TY
ST.
SE
A
R
MISSIO
CO
MM
ER
T. S
E
LS
KS
CIA
OA
T. S
E
CO
101,479 SF (2.33 ACRES)

ZONING DESIGNATION: CR, CO
DISTANCE FROM
CITY HALL: 0 MILES
ST.
MM
ER
500-696 COMMERCIAL ST. SE
based on scoring
DW
AY
S
T. S
E
Top Four Sites
BR
ES
VACATE OAK ST.

AND ALLEY
POTENTIAL
SETBACK
100,109 SF (2.3 ACRES)

+ STREET
ZONING DESIGNATION: CR
DISTANCE FROM
CITY HALL: .05 MILES
NE
VU
LS
T. S
E
LLE
CITY OWNED PROPERTY

(WINDOWS TO WEST)
LE
SLI
ADDRESS:
E
CIA
BE
SITE 1
315 MISSION ST.
LOCATION
COST
SUITABILITY
OA
SITE 2
COMMERCIAL
& LESLIE
ADDRESS:
TY
ER
.N
ST
MULTIPLE PARCELS
POTENTIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK
SITE 15 - LIBERTY & HIGH (DT

STORAGE)
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
16
8
14
13.5
12
13.5
12
15
10
5
10
PROS:
+ Central Location
+ Community
Visibility
+ Large Site
+ Neighborhood
Compatibility
+ Ease of

Acquisition
+ Redevelopment
Catalyst
+ Urban Renewal
Potential
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
14
10
14
6
12
12
7.5
10.5
7
3
K.
10
TOTAL:
129
CONS:
- Multiple Parcels
- Potential

Environmental Risk
TOTAL:
106
PROS:
+
+
LIB
LARGE SITE
NEIGHBORH
COMPATIBIL
URBAN REN
POTENTIAL
CONS:
-
PROS:
+ Large Site
+ Neighborhood
Compatibility
+ Urban Renewal

Potential
CONS:
- Community Visibility
- Potential

Environmental Risk
13
COMMUNITY
POTENTIAL
ENVIRONME
Es
ca
la
tio
n
PARKING
SUMMARY
Public Parking: 40
N/A
40
Police Parking: 126 x1.39
175
Staff Parking:
240
172 x1.39
445 spaces
January 15, 2016
28,000 SF
28,000 SF
28,000 SF
31,000 SF
5 Level
37,000 SF
(Site 13)
BLOCKING
&
STACKING
OPTIONS
42,000 SF
42,000 SF
42,000 SF
4 Level
24,000 SF
(Site 1 & site 2)
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
4 Level
37,500 SF
(Site 1-option b & site 15)

January 15, 2016
28,000 SF
28,000 SF
4 LEVEL (SITE 1)
28,000 SF
Level
SALEM POLICE HEADQUARTERS
Department
31,000 SF
5 Level
BGSF
LEVEL 1:
37,000 SF
(Site 13)
LEVEL 2:
28,000 SF
28,000 SF
28,000 SF
Quartermaster
Evidence
Jail Transport
Crime Lab
2,254
10,880
2,195
4,953
2,694
13,002
2,622
5,919
TOTAL
20,282
24,237
3,731
810
731
1,704
612
5,856
5,371
0
1,456
4,271
5,738
880
847
4,459
968
874
2,036
731
6,998
6,418
0
1,740
5,104
6,857
1,052
1,012
3,752
TOTAL
32,007
42,000
Criminal Investigations
Street Crimes
Gang Enforcement/Graffiti Abatement
Youth Services (YSU) & DARE
Crime Prevention
Locker Rooms
Toilets & Showers
Exercise Room
Mat Room
Break/Lunch Room
HVAC
10,031
3,494
1,001
884
1,989
8,580
2,420
1,320
1,430
862
11,987
4,176
1,196
1,056
2,377
10,253
2,892
1,577
1,709
1,031
3,746
TOTAL
32,012
42,000
Administration
Planning & Research
Personnel & Training
Fleet Vehicles
Volunteers
Cadets
WVCC
EOC
IT
HVAC
5,438
449
3,480
483
338
234
13,596
4,320
1,242
6,498
537
4,159
577
404
280
16,247
5,162
1,484
4,458
TOTAL
29,579
39,805
113,879
148,041
Shift Command
Downtown Bike Patrol
Telephone Reporting (TRO)
Traffic Control Unit (TCU)
CSO
Special Teams
Patrol Support
K-9
Domestic Violence
Records
Public Facilities
Department Storage
Custodial
HVAC
Notes
LEVEL 3:
44,000 SF
5 Level
Program
DGSF
BLOCKING
&
STACKING
OPTIONS
24,000 SF
(Site 2)
LEVEL 4:
42,000 SF
42,000 SF
42,000 SF
4 Level
24,000 SF
BUILDING TOTAL
(Site 1 & Site

site 15)
2)
January 15, 2016
28,000 SF
28,000 SF
28,000 SF
31,000 SF
5 Level
37,000 SF
(Site 13)
SALEM POLICE HEADQUARTERS

5 LEVEL (SITE 13)
Level
LEVEL 1:
Public
LEVEL 1:
Secure
Department
Program
DGSF
BGSF
Records
Telephone Reporting (TRO)
Public Facilities
TOTAL
4,271
731
5,738
10,740
5,104
874
6,857
12,835
Quartermaster
Evidence
Jail Transport
Crime Lab
TOTAL
2,254
10,880
2,195
4,953
20,282
2,694
13,002
2,622
5,919
24,237
3,731
810
1,704
612
5,856
5,371
0
1,456
880
847
4,459
968
2,036
731
6,998
6,418
0
1,740
1,052
1,012
5,587
21,266
31,000
449
3,480
483
8,580
2,420
1,320
1,430
862
338
234
537
4,159
577
10,253
2,892
1,577
1,709
1,031
404
280
2,989
TOTAL
19,596
26,407
Criminal Investigations
Street Crimes
Gang Enforcement/Graffiti Abatement
Youth Services (YSU) & DARE
Crime Prevention
Administration
10,031
3,494
1,001
884
1,989
5,438
11,987
4,176
1,196
1,056
2,377
6,498
TOTAL
22,837
27,290
WVCC
EOC
IT
HVAC
13,596
4,320
1,242
16,247
5,162
1,484
3,381
TOTAL
19,158
26,275
113,879
148,043
Notes
BLOCKING
&
STACKING
OPTIONS
LEVEL 2:
Shift Command
Downtown Bike Patrol
Traffic Control Unit (TCU)
CSO
Special Teams
Patrol Support
K-9
Domestic Violence
Department Storage
Custodial
HVAC
28,000 SF
28,000 SF
28,000 SF
TOTAL
LEVEL 3:
Planning & Research
Personnel & Training
Fleet Vehicles
Locker Rooms
Toilets & Showers
Exercise Room
Mat Room
Break/Lunch Room
Volunteers
Cadets
HVAC
44,000 SF
5 Level
24,000 SF
(Site 2)
LEVEL 4:
42,000 SF
42,000 SF
42,000 SF
4 Level
(Site 1 & site 15)
24,000 SF
LEVEL 5:
BUILDING TOTAL
January 15, 2016
SITE 2
Commercial & Leslie
Existing Parking
Structure
LES
100,109 SF (2.3 Acres) + street

Number of Parcels: 16
Zoning Designation: CR
Distance from City Hall: 0 Miles
ST S
RTY
ST S
PROS:
+ Central location
+ Service to City
+ Public Access
+ Community Visibility
+ Existing Parking Space Opportunities
+ Multiple Site Access Locations
CONS:
- Small site
- Multiple parcels
- No Urban Renewal potential
LIBE
COMMERCIAL
ST SE
LIE
Address:
315 Mission Street SE
MISSION ST SE
NORTH
50
Seasonal Sun Exposure

Vehicular circulation
Existing structure to be demolished
100
200
Downward slope of site

Site Boundaries
Views
January 21, 2016
SITE 2
Commercial & Leslie
Address:
E
une
xca
ST SE
On-grade
Public Parking
(40 Spaces)
Level 1
37,500 SF
PROS:
+ Central location
+ Service to City
+ Public Access
CONS:
- Small site
- Multiple parcels
LIBE
COMMERCIAL
vate
Police / Staff Parking

(70 Spaces)

ST S
ST S
LIE
RTY
LES
MISSION ST SE
NORTH
50
Proposed Parking - ON-SITE:

40
Public Parking
140 Police Patrol
80
Staff
Mission St.
Section
37,500 SF
Existing Parking (110 staff)
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
Existing Parking (n/a)
Parking (150 Spaces)

Leslie St
Existing Parking (library)
Level 4
Level 3
Library Plaza
Level 2
Level 1
Proposed Parking - ADJACENT

PARKING STRUCTURE:
110 Police/ Staff Parking @
Garage Level 3
E
E
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry
370 TOTAL dedicated Police

parking (initial project)
75
OFF-SITE (City Campus)
January 21, 2016
SITE 2
Commercial & Leslie
Existing Garage
Address:
(No Shared Parking)
LES
LIE

ST S

(150 Spaces)
Public Parking
Below
RTY
ST S
Level 2
37,500 SF
CONS:
- Small site
- Multiple parcels
LIBE
COMMERCIAL
ST SE
Sally Port
PROS:
+ Central location
+ Service to City
+ Public Access
MISSION ST SE
NORTH
50

40
Public Parking
140 Police Patrol
80
Staff
Mission St.
Section
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
37,500 SF

Leslie St
Level 4
Level 3
Library Plaza
Level 2
Level 1

PARKING STRUCTURE:
Garage Level 3
E
E
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry

75
January 21, 2016
SITE 2
Commercial & Leslie
Existing Garage
Address:
(No Shared Parking)
LES

ST S
RTY
ST S
Level 3
37,500 SF
PROS:
+ Central location
+ Service to City
+ Public Access
CONS:
- Small site
- Multiple parcels
LIBE
COMMERCIAL
ST SE
LIE
MISSION ST SE
NORTH
50

40
Public Parking
140 Police Patrol
80
Staff
Mission St.
Section
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
37,500 SF

Leslie St
Level 4
Level 3
Library Plaza
Level 2
Level 1

PARKING STRUCTURE:
Garage Level 3
E
E
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry

75
January 21, 2016
SITE 2
Commercial & Leslie
Existing Garage
LES
Address:
ST S

RTY
ST S
Level 4
37,500 SF
PROS:
+ Central location
+ Service to City
+ Public Access
CONS:
- Small site
- Multiple parcels
LIBE
COMMERCIAL
ST SE
LIE
Shared Staff Parking

(110 Spaces)
MISSION ST SE
NORTH
50

40
Public Parking
140 Police Patrol
80
Staff
Mission St.
Section
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
37,500 SF

Leslie St
Level 4
Level 3
Library Plaza
Level 2
Level 1

PARKING STRUCTURE:
Garage Level 3
E
E
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry

75
January 21, 2016
City Hall Parking
Current Parking Uses:

32
City Parking - (Former
Police Staff)
50
City Parking (Former
Police Patrol)
48
City
Parking
City Parking (Former

Police)
Possible addition
of surface
parking
Library
52
Future
campus parking
potential
Commercial & Leslie

Address:
City Hall
40 stalls
12 stalls
SITE 2
Existing Deck 1 & 2

Existing Library Parking
to remain
PROS:
+ Central location
+ Service to City
+ Public Access
CONS:
- High development cost
- Small site
- Multiple parcels
Library
Parking
MISSION ST SE
ST S
Proposed Salem
Police Facility
ST S
RTY
COMMERCIAL
ST SE
LIE
Existing Deck 3:
Garage Level 3
LIBE
LES
NORTH

40
Public Parking
140 Police Patrol
80
Staff
80
160
320
130
City Parking (former

Police)
(-110) Police Parking (Former
City)
20
City Parking NET GAIN
52
Future campus parking

potential
January 21, 2016

Potential
Setback
Existing structure to be
demolished
St.
NE
Com
mer
cial
Site Boundaries
ty
r
e
Li
St
E
N
.
Views
SITE 13
Division & Commercial
(OBrien)
Address:
742 Commercial St.
186,437 SF (4.27 Acres)
Zoning Designation: CB
Distance from City Hall: .75 Miles
PROS:
+ Central location
+ Community visibility
+ Large Site
+ Neighborhood compatibility
+ Ease of acquisition
+ Public access
+ Redevelopment catalyst
+ Urban renewal potential
CONS:
- Multiple parcels
- Potential environmental risk
- Poor Access from Southbound
Commercial / Limited Site Access
NORTH
50
Divi
sion
100
200
St. N
January 21, 2016
Potential
Setback
Level 1
60,000 SF
SITE 13
Total Parking Provided
On Site:
Public Parking: 40 spaces
Police Parking: 175 spaces
Staff Parking: 185 spaces

(OBrien)
Off Site (Parkade): 45
186,437 SF (4.27 Acres)


(160 Spaces)
cial
St.
NE
PROS:
+ Central location
+ Large Site
+ Public access
Com
mer
E
Sally Port
Police Parking
(40 Spaces)
Level 1
37,000 SF
Lobby/
community
room
On-grade
Public Parking
(40 Spaces)
Address:
742 Commercial St.
ib
ty
r
e
St
E
N
.
E
E
Public Entry
Private Entry
CONS:
- Multiple parcels
NORTH
50
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
Divi
sion
St. N
Revised intersection to
allow access
eastbound on Division
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
100
200
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Section
January 21, 2016
Potential
Setback
Level 2
60,000 SF
SITE 13
On Site:

(OBrien)
186,437 SF (4.27 Acres)


(160 Spaces)
cial
St.
NE
PROS:
+ Central location
+ Large Site
+ Public access
Com
mer
Address:
742 Commercial St.
ib
ty
r
e
St
E
N
.
E
E
Public Entry
Private Entry
CONS:
- Multiple parcels
NORTH
50
Level 2
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
Divi
sion
St. N
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
100
200
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Section
January 21, 2016
Potential
Setback
SITE 13
On Site:

(OBrien)
186,437 SF (4.27 Acres)

Address:
742 Commercial St.
Com
mer
cial
St.
NE
PROS:
+ Central location
+ Large Site
+ Public access
ib
ty
r
e
St
E
N
.
E
E
Public Entry
Private Entry
CONS:
- Multiple parcels
NORTH
50
Level 3, 4
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
Divi
sion
St. N
37,500 SF
37,500 SF
100
200
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Section
January 21, 2016
SITE 1
Bell
evu
City owned property

(windows to west)
e St
. SE
Address:
500-696 Commercial St. SE
SE
Site
Depression
/
Riparian
Zone
PROS:
+ Central location
mer
cial
St.
Vacate Oak St.

& Alley
101,479 SF (2.33 Acres)

Zoning Designation: CR, CO
Com
CONS:
- Small site
- Public Access
Oak
St. S
NORTH
50

100
200

Site Boundaries
Views
January 15, 2016
SITE 1
Bell
evu
Vacate Oak St.

& Alley
City owned property

(windows to west)
e St
. SE
Dn
Address:
101,479 SF (2.33 Acres)
Basement Level
76,000 SF
SE

(225 Spaces)
mer
cial
St.
PROS:
+ Central location
Com
CONS:
- Small site
- Public Access
Oak
St. S
NORTH
50
42,000 SF
Oak St.
Public Parking
(50 Spaces)
Level 4
42,000 SF
Level 3
42,000 SF
24,000 SF
Level 2
Bellevue St.

On Site:
Off Site: 0
E
E
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry
Level 1
Basement Level
January 15, 2016
Up
SITE 1
Bell
evu
City owned property

(windows to west)
e St
. SE
Sally Port
Dn
Evidence
Address:
Level 1
24,000 SF
Vacate Oak St.

& Alley
101,479 SF (2.33 Acres)

E
52,000 SF
SE

(160 Spaces)
mer
cial
St.
PROS:
+ Central location
Com
CONS:
- Small site
- Public Access
OakDn
St. S
NORTH
50
42,000 SF
Oak St.
Public Parking
(50 Spaces)
Level 4
42,000 SF
Level 3
42,000 SF
24,000 SF
Level 2
Bellevue St.

On Site:
Off Site: 0
E
E
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry
Level 1
Basement Level
January 15, 2016
SITE 1
Bell
evu
City owned property

(windows to west)
e St
. SE
Address:
Level 2
42,000 SF
SE
St.
17,000 SF
Staff Parking
(10 Spaces)
Up
PROS:
+ Central location
cial
Public Parking
(40 Spaces)
OakDn
St. S
mer
Public Plaza
CONS:
- Small site
- Public Access
Com
Vacate Oak St.

& Alley
101,479 SF (2.33 Acres)

Up
NORTH
50
42,000 SF
Oak St.
Public Parking
(50 Spaces)
Level 4
42,000 SF
Level 3
42,000 SF
24,000 SF
Level 2
Bellevue St.

On Site:
Off Site: 0
E
E
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry
Level 1
Basement Level
January 15, 2016
SITE 1
Bell
evu
City owned property

(windows to west)
e St
. SE
Address:
101,479 SF (2.33 Acres)
Level 3 & 4
42,000 SF
SE
Vacate Oak St.

& Alley
mer
cial
St.
PROS:
+ Central location
Com
CONS:
- Small site
- Public Access
Oak
St. S
NORTH
50
42,000 SF
Oak St.
Public Parking
(50 Spaces)
Level 4
42,000 SF
Level 3
42,000 SF
24,000 SF
Level 2
Bellevue St.

On Site:
Off Site: 0
E
E
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry
Level 1
Basement Level
January 15, 2016
B ro
adw
ay
St.
N
SITE 15
Potential
Setback
Liberty & High

(DT Storage)
Address:
985 Broadway St. NE
245,687 SF (5.4 Acres)
Zoning Designation: RH
PROS:
+ Large site
ty
r
e
E
N
.
CONS:
- Community visibility
- Majority of Site in Flood Plain
St
b
Li
NORTH
50

100
200

Site Boundaries
Views
January 21, 2016
Lam
ar
Av
e. A
cce
ss
St.
N
SITE 15
Potential
Setback
B ro
adw
ay
Sally Port
Level 0
(200 Spaces)
Liberty & High

(DT Storage)
Address:
985 Broadway St. NE
245,687 SF (5.4 Acres)
PROS:
+ Large site
CONS:
Up
ty
r
e
E
N
.
St
b
Li
NORTH
50
37,000 SF
Level 4
37,000 SF
Level 3
37,500 SF
Level 2
Parking
(255 Spaces)
Parking
(200 Spaces)
Level 1
Level 0
Section
37,500 SF

On Site:
Off Site: 0
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry
Broadway St.
January 21, 2016
Potential
Setback
(215 Spaces)
Level 1
37,500 SF
B ro
adw
ay
St.
N
SITE 15
Address:
985 Broadway St. NE
245,687 SF (5.4 Acres)
PROS:
+ Large site
Public Parking
(40 Spaces)
ty
r
e
Liberty & High

(DT Storage)
CONS:
E
N
.
St
b
Li
NORTH
50
37,000 SF
Level 4
37,000 SF
Level 3
37,500 SF
Level 2
Parking
(255 Spaces)
Parking
(200 Spaces)
Level 1
Level 0
Section
37,500 SF

On Site:
Off Site: 0
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry
Broadway St.
January 21, 2016
Level 2-4
37,500 SF
Potential
Setback
B ro
adw
ay
St.
N
SITE 15
Liberty & High
(DT Storage)
Address:
985 Broadway St. NE
245,687 SF (5.4 Acres)
PROS:
+ Large site
ty
r
e
CONS:
E
N
.
St
b
Li
NORTH
50
37,000 SF
Level 4
37,000 SF
Level 3
37,500 SF
Level 2
Parking
(255 Spaces)
Parking
(200 Spaces)
Level 1
Level 0
Section
37,500 SF

On Site:
Off Site: 0
100
200
Public Entry
Private Entry
Broadway St.
January 21, 2016

Police Facility Work Session

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Police Facility Work Session

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Salem Police Facility

Preliminary Findings Study

January 21, 2016

Salem Police Facility

Officer/1000 Residents Served

NATIONAL CAPITOL CITY EXAMPLES

Population based on US Census Bureau Data

534 SWORN OFFICERS

376 SWORN OFFICERS

January 21, 2016

668 SWORN OFFICERS

750 SWORN OFFICERS

467 SWORN OFFICERS

355 SWORN OFFICERS

Salem Police Facility

190 SWORN OFFICERS

103 SWORN OFFICERS

137 SWORN OFFICERS

Officer/1000 Residents Served

January 21, 2016

102 SWORN OFFICERS

187 SWORN OFFICERS

260 SWORN OFFICERS

Population based on US Census Bureau Data

Salem Police Facility

(Remodel of existing facility)

January 21, 2016

Salem Police Facility

Chief/Administration Staff, Command Staff,

Fleet Vehicles, Planning & Research, Personnel &

Criminal, Street Crimes, Youth Services,

General Patrol, Downtown Bicycle, Traffic,

Information Technology, Willamette Valley

Locker Rooms, Toilet & Showers, Exercise

Ancillary, Site, Public Space

January 21, 2016

- Hours of operations observation and patrol

Salem Police Facility

January 21, 2016

based on in-depth review (DLR Group)

- DLR GROUP RECOMMENDED PROGRAM

BLUE RIBBON TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS

OPTIONS FOR REDUCING BUILDING SIZE

- Unilateral reduction of square footage based on percentage

Totals in Building Gross Square Footage Based on 30 Year

Salem Police Facility

January 21, 2016

Conduct Site Evaluation (IACP)

Salem Police Facility

January 21, 2016

IACP SITE EVALUATION CRITERIA

RECOMMENDED SALEM SITE CATEGORIES

Cost of site development

Size and shape of site

Topography / geotechnical / soils

Proximity to other governmental functions

Travel and mileage issues

Former use of identified land

Response to citizens needs and concerns a neighborhood context

Possible ground contamination

Potential for multiple uses

Visibility and views

Public access to site (vehicular and pedestrian)