Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Economic Rationality
Principal behavioral assumption decision maker chooses its most preferred
alternative from those available
o Model decision-makers preferences
o Available choice constitute the choice set
Theory of Preferences
Self-interest individual maximizes over a set of preferences subject to constraints
o They do their best given the circumstances
Theory based on
1. Individuals have consistent preferences
2. Individuals seek to maximize their preference ranking
3. Individuals are willing to make tradeoffs between different goods
preference statements:
o ability to say you like a bundle better
o ability to say you like both equally (indifferent)
preference ordering:
o using preference statements
o if 2 conditions are satisfied:
1. always able to make preference statements
2. preference statements are consistent
Preference Relations
Comparing 2 consumption bundles
o X (has x1 of good 1 and x2 of good 2)
o Y (has y1 of good 1, y2 of good 2)
Strict preference: x is more preferred than y
o
o x y x preferred strictly to bundle y
Weak preference: x is liked as much as y (at least as
o
o x y x preferred at least as much as y
Indifference: x is exactly liked as much as y
o ~
o x ~ y x & y equally preferred
x y and y x x ~ y
x y and (not y x) x y
preferred)
x
Complete
Relationship (R) is complete for any pair of elements x,y
o xRy ; yRx
o at least one is true
relationship complete:
o relation is F (fits) example triangle fitting in a circle ; another triangle fitting
in a circle
o not relation when the triangle dont fit into each other
NOT complete
Completeness: any 2 bundle x and y its always possible to make:
o x y (x liked as much as y)
o y x (y liked as much as x)
never unable to rank them (indifferent)
Reflectivity
any bundle x is at least as preferred as itself
o x x
not every relation is reflexive
o A perpendicular to B
o B perpendicular to A
o A is not perpendicular to itself
Transitivity
Is x is at least as preferred as y
& y at least as preferred as z
then x is at least as preferred as z
o x y and y z x z
no every relation is transitive
o A perpendicular to B
o B perpendicular to C
o A is not perpendicular to C = parallel
Non-Transitive Preferences
Alberts preferences
o A B, B C, C A
o Has bundle A offer C in exchange for A and $1
o Then offer B in exchange for C + $1
o Offer A in exchange for B + $1
o In the end has what he started with - $3
Binary Relationship Properties
Preference relation is
o Complete
All bundles of gods ranked
o Reflexive
A is liked as much as itself
o Transitive
x liked at least as much as y & y liked at least as much as z x liked
alam as z)
Indifference Curves
bundle x
shows bundles consumers think are indifferent not ones that are better and worse
indifference curves cannot cross (transivity assumption)
carver farther from the origin are more preferred
set of all bundles equally preferred to x is the indifference curve containing x
o the set of all bundle y ~ x
not always a curve
indifference set
Extreme
Indifference Curves
Perfect
Substitutes
if consumer thinks of the units of commodities 1 & 2 are equivalent
o perfect subs
Bads
commodity consumer doesnt like
example likes peperoni doesnt like anchovies (tradeoff)
o give extra peperoni to compensate for the anchovies
o anchovies vertical (bad); pep on horizontal (good)
Neutrals
consumer doesnt care about it one way or the other
o cares about amount of pepperoni he has, nothing about
anchovies
Preferences Exhibiting Station
Bundle strictly preferred is a satiation point (bliss
point)
Overall best bundle
Indifference curves:
Indifference Curves With a Discrete Good
Commodity infinitely divisible if it can be acquired in any quantity
(water/cheese)
Commodity discrete: comes in unit integers (1,2,)
(cars/comps)
Example:
Commodity 2 = infinitely divisible (gas)
Commodity 1 = discrete (cars)
rate
Well-Behaved preference
Well-behaved: if it is monotonic & convex
Monotonicity: more of any good is always preferred
o no satiation, every commodity is a good
o negative slope
o more of both bundles is better
Convexity: mixture of bundles (atleast weakly) preferred to
bundles themselves
Example:
50-50 mixture of x & y z = (0.5)x + (0.5)y z at least as preferred as x or y
Strict Convexity
Non-Convex Preferences I
Slopes
of Indifference
Non-Convex Preference II
Curves