Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Contents
Acknowledgements
Dedications
About the authors
Preface
How to use this book
Introduction
The Vision
Overview
vii
viii
ix
x
xii
1
3
7
7
14
14
20
30
Project initiation
40
43
43
50
51
69
85
95
139
142
142
143
144
145
147
147
149
149
Tools
152
152
153
155
156
156
157
159
Case studies
Appendix A
171
171
Templates
Appendix B
References and useful sources of information
vi
163
163
166
187
187
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the following people for their help in
the writing of this book:
vii
Dedications
viii
ix
Preface
Dave reached the office shortly after 9.00 a.m. Bleary-eyed through
having been up most of the night trying to resolve an issue with a
server that turned out to have no maintenance contract and no
backups, he sat down heavily at his desk, the resulting gust of wind
scattering the various post-it notes that had been left there,
informing him of things that needed to be done, things that werent
working and people to call so they could tell him that things werent
working and needed to be done.
He looked across the crowded office to the help desk, where a
number of earnest-looking and very busy twenty-somethings sat,
frantically taking call after call whilst their harassed supervisor
pleaded over the general hullaballoo, Did anyone change anything
last night? Anything? Anyone?
A stack of new PCs engulfed the desk next to him, the latest in a
long line of deliveries intended for hurried installation by an
over-stretched team of desk-side engineers. 9Maybe we should have
planned a bit better before we installed the latest version of Office
on everyones machine three months ago9, he reflected. The resulting
flood of slow-PC complaints had kept the first-line, second-line and
procurement teams busy ever since.
User service had suffered heavily as a result of the need to divert
resources to the installations and Dave glanced down the
ever-increasing list of overdue calls and sighed. Its probably a good
job we never meet with user management, he thought. And lucky
we dont have an SLA they can hang us by too.
Dave sat back in his chair and took a deep breath. 9Another fun day
at the office9, he whispered wearily.
Of course, things may not be as bad as this within your company. The
fact is that many small IT teams get by pretty well a lot of the time
without having any formal IT service management in place. They deliver
the required projects on time and are generally well thought of by the
people they support. So whats all the fuss about? What is wrong with
the way we do things now?
Well, one of the issues is that the current level of service usually comes at
a price; in terms of staff effort and goodwill; in terms of cost and in
x
Preface
terms of consistency. The service is good despite the lack of proactivity,
not because of it. It is common to find that an IT team that is not using
formal processes is harassed, fed up and making more use of temporary
staff than may be necessary. There is often general agreement amongst
the team that the same mistakes are being made time and time again,
with no one taking ownership of fixing them once and for all. This leads
to a lot of frustration which may be reflected in higher than average
staff turnover or absence and world-weary negative attitudes.
Communication within the team and between teams is often poor, giving
rise to mistrust and suspicion over the causes of problems and accusations
that one team or individual has to constantly clean up after another.
Reactivity is king, often driven by users who give very little notice of
requests such as office moves or new starters, partly (but often not
completely) because they have never been told what notice is actually
required or what their request involves.
The services delivered are those that the IT team assume the users want,
in the way that they assume the users want them. Meanwhile, the users
may have local workarounds to cope with the perceived inadequacies of
IT, but no one has the time to sit down and talk about how they might
be changed. Major incidents such as systems failing or sites being down
can be an almost daily occurrence, with the same actions being taken to
resolve them every time, often without a clear idea of why it just
works
In a small team, the techie can wield a disproportionate amount of
control and often lives by the mantra that knowledge is power,
declining to communicate or document unless forced to do so. Testing is
often thought unnecessary because, he declares, I know what Im doing,
and the big-bang approach is the standard implementation method for
the same reason, with sometimes catastrophic results.
A reactive IT team is constantly surprised, whether its by a server disk
filling up or an office closing down. It may still deliver good service, but
its often by the skin of its teeth every time. But one of the best ways to
tell whether implementing good practice will help you as an IT team is to
talk to other teams that have already done it. Ask them whether they
would go back to doing things the way they used to and we are
confident that you will not find a single one that would. OK, they may
admit that sometimes they reminisce about the days when they could just
go ahead and change something or fix an issue without logging it, but
would they abandon the control and stability they have experienced
since they started doing it? We think not.
xi
You just turn the pages, right? Well, yes, but we want you to get much
more out of this book than just a theoretical appreciation of what IT
service management is about. We want you to be able to take the ideas
set out in these pages and really apply them to your small IT team. We
know its not easy; we know there are a lot of different areas covered,
and we also know youre busy.
Thats why we have tried to summarize the various approaches and
sources of information about IT service management in short, hopefully
easy-to-read chapters, ending with a concise summary and some pointers
as to what to do next to move things forward in your organization. Its a
big subject and inevitably there are some things we have left out either
because we dont think they will be that useful to you or because they
are more advanced concepts inappropriate for an introductory book such
as this. You should also be aware that there are different ways of looking
at some of the concepts of IT service management and in some areas the
industry experts disagree with each other; we have tried to tread a
middle ground based on our experience and put usefulness to a small IT
team first in deciding what to cover.
We have also ordered the chapters in what we believe to be a logical
sequence for someone attempting to implement the ideas as they go
along. So we start with some typical reasons why organizations like yours
make use of good practice and then go on to how to create a business
case to convince your senior management that it is a good idea, before
planning a service improvement project in detail.
But let us also point out that there is an alternative approach which the
book will also support. Many organizations that have used these concepts
never created a business case, did not secure any extra funding nor did
they plan it as a project. They just took the ideas and started to apply
them in small ways in the day-to-day management of their services. No
grand plan, just improvement little by little. If things get busy they have
a break from introducing improvements and when its a bit quieter they
spend more time on them. So this does not have to be a big deal within
your team with pressured deadlines and high management expectations.
Just start to do things differently, gradually.
Although we set out as full a list as we can of the current frameworks,
standards and methods prevailing in IT service management at the
xii
xiii
Introduction
Introduction
All of these factors can mean that the implementation timescale for new
IT service management processes in a small IT team can be significantly
shorter than that for a larger organization, and the benefits of following
good practice can be felt more quickly. This means that users and IT staff
can reap the rewards of better service in a timeframe that most large
organizations could only dream of.
It also helps to address a number of issues often faced by a typical small
IT team including:
The Vision
The Vision
So IT service management good practice can help a small IT team in all of
the areas that have just been listed. But if we had to summarize the real
contribution that it can potentially make to your teams standing in your
organization, it would be using Figure 1.
All too many small IT teams are viewed by their parent organization as
an expense which they would rather not have. Senior management
realize that IT is a necessary part of a modern business but have little
Introduction
The Vision
Summary
Previously ITIL and ISO/IEC 20000 have not absolutely correlated as there
were processes specified in ITIL which did not exist in ISO/IEC 20000
(event management, for example), but the principles set out in
ISO/IEC 20000 could still be used to fill the gaps for those missing
processes. The ISO/IEC 20000 standard is constantly being reviewed and is
revised every five or so years to keep it in line with good practice
thinking. A revised version of Part 1 (the Requirements) of the
Overview
ISO/IEC 20000 standard was published in 2011; one of the objectives of
this new version is to realign the standard with ITIL V3 more fully.
To summarize and draw an academic parallel, it could broadly be said
that IT service management is the subject, ITIL is the set of knowledge
that forms the content and ISO/IEC 20000 is the exam that you can
choose to take at the end to prove your organizations proficiency in the
subject.
A bit of history
There are a few things about ITIL that deserve a quick mention. It began
life in the 1980s as the IT Infrastructure Library, a collection of 34 books
covering aspects of managing IT operations. Titles ranged from the
familiar Change Management, to guidance on Local Area Network wiring
and Setting up a Machine Room. The intention was to improve IT service
quality in central and local government, and nationalized utilities. This
was Version 1.
ITIL Version 2 was developed mainly in the late 1990s. It had a narrower
focus, on the more familiar set of seven books and the associated topics
(although most of the attention was typically put on the first two of
these, known as the Red and Blue Books):
ITIL started to spread worldwide and leap across the divide between
public and private sector, the Netherlands having an especially prominent
and active role. By around 2000, it had become the de facto standard for
IT service management. The project to create ITIL Version 3, originally
labelled as the ITIL Refresh, was announced in 2005 and it was
published in May 2007. This consolidated the V2 guidance into a set of
five books, one for each stage of a life cycle, consisting of:
1.
2.
3.
Service strategy
Service design
Service transition
4.
5.
Service operation
Continual Service Improvement.
10
Overview
supports and assists management in the governance of IT by providing a
comprehensive description of a series of control objectives for all IT
processes and by providing a mechanism for monitoring, measuring and
assessing the ongoing maturity of the processes.
ISO/IEC 38500 is an international standard describing a framework for
the governance of the use of IT by an organization. This is subtly
different from (but closely linked to) COBIT in that COBIT is a model for
the governance of processes within IT whereas ISO/IEC 38500 is a model
for how senior management (the board of directors or similar) should
govern and set strategic direction for IT across the organization.
Lean is a continual improvement method, often described as a mindset,
the core idea of which is to maximize customer value while minimizing
waste. Lean simply means creating more value for customers with fewer
resources. Within IT Lean has been a relatively recent entrant to the
discussion, although it has been around in other industries, particularly
manufacturing, for some time.
SixSigma was originally developed in the mid-1980s by Motorola, as a
way to measure and reduce the amount of variation or inconsistency in a
process. It provides a quantitative methodology for continual
improvement and lowering costs by reducing the amount of variation in
process outcomes to a level suitable for the given organization.
Others
There are also several other frameworks, models and international
standards which support various parts of IT service management, such as:
Decisions, decisions
Although this book focuses quite heavily on the processes associated with
IT service management, it is worth pointing out at an early stage that the
actual aim of all of this is to deliver to the business the support that it
IT Service Management for Small IT Teams
This is a sample chapter from IT Service Management for Small IT Teams.
To read more and buy, visit http://shop.bsigroup.com/BIP0129
BSI British Standards Institution
11
requires. That doesnt just mean fixing PCs when needed; it involves
providing the business with the means to deliver its goods or services to
its customers in the most effective way. IT can be a huge enabler of this
but only if the mindset is right. Theres an oft-cited adage that people do
not want quarter-inch drill bits, they want quarter-inch holes. We would
contend that they actually want a place to keep their books which is
reliant on having a shelf, which is reliant on brackets, which need
quarter-inch holes for the screws to support the brackets. In reality, the
customers perception of the value delivered by IT will be measured by
how easy it is to perform its tasks. Please keep this in mind even when
we are deep into the detail of a particular process.
So which of these various options should a manager of a small IT team
use to help further his/her IT service management ambitions? Inevitably
this is a difficult question. All of the frameworks, standards and methods
outlined above have been created over a period of time by very clever
people and, used correctly, will all help to improve the way in which you
deliver IT services to your organization. One answer would be that you
should try to take the best from each of the above options, but for a
busy IT manager we recognize that this would be a very time-consuming
approach and probably lead to a great deal of confusion for you and
your staff.
So our recommendation is that you choose a single standard or
framework as your main source of knowledge and run with it, using
other sources if you wish as backup information to fill in the occasional
gap or expand upon specific areas. This is the approach we have taken in
writing this book and so we have had to come down on the side of one
or two of the above methods in order to keep the subject logical and
consistent.
For the record, then, the advice given within these pages is largely based
upon the ISO/IEC 20000 standard, with further expansion supplied from
the ITIL V3 framework. We could have used COBIT or MOF (or even ITIL
V2) and so can you if you choose to. But, as we have already admitted,
our combined experience leans towards ISO/IEC 20000 and ITIL V3 so we
feel we can do a better job of explaining the ideas with these as a guide.
That said, lets start making some progress.
12
Overview
Summary
Next step
13