Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
GLASGOW 2011
British Academy
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
XIV th INTERNATIONAL NUMISMATIC CONGRESS
GLASGOW 2009
I
CONTENTS
Preface
Editors note
18
19
Inaugural lecture
A foreigners view of the coinage of Scotland, by Nicholas MAYHEW
23
Antiquity: Greek
I Delfini (distribuzione, associazioni, valenza simbolica), by Pasquale APOLITO
35
42
48
Up-to-date survey of the silver coinage of the Nabatean king Aretas IV, by Rachel
BARKAY
52
58
67
Not only art! The period of the signing masters and historical iconography,
by Maria CACCAMO CALTABIANO
73
81
89
97
105
114
123
CONTENTS
131
The coinage of the Scythian kings in the West Pontic area: iconography, by
Dimitar DRAGANOV
140
The royal archer and Apollo in the East: Greco-Persian iconography in the
Seleukid Empire, by Kyle ERICKSON & Nicholas L. WRIGHT
163
170
178
184
189
199
203
213
Archaic Greek coins east of the Tigris: evidence for circulation?, by J. KAGAN
230
237
246
251
The coinage of Chios during the Hellenistic and early Roman periods, by
Constantine LAGOS
259
265
CONTENTS
269
280
285
293
Some remarks concerning the gold coins with the legend , by Lucian
MUNTEANU
304
310
The coinage of the Paeonian kings Leon and Dropion, by Eftimija PAVLOVSKA
319
Le trsor des monnaies perses dor trouv Argamum / Orgam (Jurilovca, dp.
de Tulcea, Roumanie), by E. PETAC, G. TALMACHI & V. IONI
331
337
350
357
365
The coin finds from Hellenistic and Roman Berytas (fourth century BC third
century AD, by Ziad SAWAYA
376
382
Uso della moneta presso gli indigeni della Sicilia centro-meridionale, by Lavinia
SOLE
393
405
CONTENTS
417
427
436
Zur Datierung und Deutung der Beizeichen auf Stateren von Grtyn, by
Burkhard TRAEGER
441
447
461
473
487
The civic bronze coins of the Eleans: some preliminary remarks, by Franck
WOJAN
497
500
Antiquity: Roman
The coinage of Diva Faustina I, by Martin BECKMANN
509
514
The key to the Varus defeat: the Roman coin finds from Kalkriese, by Frank
BERGER
527
Monetary circulation in the Bosporan Kingdom in the Roman period c. first fourth century AD, by Line BJERG
533
The Roman coin hoards of the second century AD found on the territory of
present-day Serbia: the reasons for their burial, by Bojana BORI-BREKOVI
538
CONTENTS
Die Mnzprgung des Thessalischen Bundes von Marcus Aurelius bis Gallienus
(161-268 n. Chr.), by Friedrich BURRER
545
557
569
576
580
592
Analytical evidence for the organization of the Alexandrian mint during the
Tetrarchy (III-IV centuries AD), by J.M.COMPANA, L. LEN-REINA, F.J.
FORTES, L.M. CABALN, J.J. LASERNA, & M.A.G. ARANDA
595
605
613
621
629
635
Monuments on the move: architectural coin types and audience targeting in the
Flavian and Trajanic periods, by Nathan T. ELKINS
645
657
662
CONTENTS
668
New coins of pre- and denarial system minted outside Italy, by Paz GARCABELLIDO
676
686
696
709
Mars and Venus on Roman imperial coinage in the time of Marcus Aurelius:
iconological considerations with special reference to the emperors
correspondence with Marcus Cornelius Fronto, by Jrgen HAMER
715
The silver coins of Aegeae in the light of Hadrians eastern silver coinages, by F.
HAYMANN
720
726
732
742
749
757
765
772
The Nome coins: some remarks on the state of research, by Katarzyna LACH
780
785
CONTENTS
794
800
809
816
822
828
839
846
856
864
Die Sammlung von Lokalmythen griechischer Stdte des Ostens: ein Projekt der
Kommission fr alte Geschichte und Epigraphik, by Johannes NOLL
872
878
888
893
901
Could the unofficial mint called Atelier II be identified with the officinae of
Chteaubleau (France)?, by Fabien PILON
906
CONTENTS
911
916
926
933
941
A stone thesaurus with a votive coin deposit found in the sanctuary of Campo
della Fiera, Orvieto (Volsinii), by Samuele RANUCCI
954
964
973
Numismatics and archaeology in Rome: the finds from the Basilica Hilariana,
by Alessia ROVELLI
983
991
999
1004
1013
1019
1020
1025
CONTENTS
1037
The iconography of two groups of struck lead from Central Italy and Baetica in
the second and first centuries BC, by Clive STANNARD
1045
1056
Personalized victory on coins: the Year of the Four Emperors Greek imperial
issues, by Yannis STOYAS
1067
1073
1082
Gold and silver first tetrarchic issues from the mint of Alexandria, by D. Scott
VANHORN
1092
Note sulla circolazione monetaria in Etruria meridionale nel III secolo a.C., by
Daniela WILLIAMS
1103
Roman coins from the western part of West Balt territory, by Anna ZAPOLSKA
1115
Antiquity: Celtic
La moneda ibrica del nordeste de la Hispania Citerior: consideraciones sobre
su cronologa y funcin, by Marta CAMPO
1135
1142
1148
1155
Trading with silver bullion during the third century BC: the hoard of Armua de
Tajua, by Manuel GOZALBES, Gonzalo CORES & Pere Pau RIPOLLS
1165
1173
10
CONTENTS
1182
1191
1198
New coin finds from the two late Iron Age settlements of Altenburg (Germany)
and Rheinau (Switzerland) a military coin series on the German-Swiss border?,
by Michael NICK
1207
1218
Antiquity: general
La moneda en el mundo funerario-ritual de Gadir-Gades, by A. ARVALO
GONZLEZ
1231
Neues Licht auf eine alte Frage? Die Verwandschaft von Mnzen und Gemmen,
by Angela BERTHOLD
1240
Tipi del cane e del lupo sulle monete del Mediterraneo antico, by Alessandra
BOTTARI
1247
Not all these things are easy to read, much less to understand: new approaches to
reading images on ancient coins, by Geraldine CHIMIRRI-RUSSELL
1254
1261
Preliminary notes on Phoenician and Punic coins kept in the Pushkin Museum,
by S. KOVALENKO & L.I. MANFREDI
1266
Greek coins from the National Historical Museum of Rio de Janeiro: SNG
project, by Marici Martins MAGALHES
1278
1292
The sacred life of coins: cult fees, sacred law and numismatic evidence, by
Isabelle A. PAFFORD
1303
Anton Prokesch-Osten and the Greek coins of the coin collection at the
Universalmuseum Joanneum in Graz, Austria, by Karl PEITLER
1310
CONTENTS
11
1323
1334
Greek and Roman coins in the collection of the orum Museum, by D. zlem
YALCIN
1344
1355
1360
1372
1382
1392
1401
1408
1411
Norwegian bracteates during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, by Linn EIKJE
1418
1426
1431
1436
1441
12
CONTENTS
1452
1458
1464
Among farmers and city people: coin use in early medieval Denmark, c. 10001250, by Gitte Tarnow INGVARDSON
1470
1477
1492
Byzantine coins from the area of Belarus, by Krystyna LAVYSH & Marcin
WOOSZYN
1500
Die frheste Darstellung des Richters auf einer mittelalterlicher Mnze?, by Ivar
LEIMUS
1509
Coinage and money in the years of insecurity: the case of late Byzantine
Chalkidiki (thirteenth - fourteenth century), by Vangelis MALADAKIS
1517
1535
The money of the First Crusade: the evidence of a new parcel and its
implications, by Michael MATZKE
1542
1552
1557
1564
1570
CONTENTS
13
1580
1591
The discovery of a hoard of coins dated to the fifth and sixth centuries in
Klapavice in the hinterland of ancient Salona, by Tomislav EPAROVI
1597
1605
1614
1620
1625
1633
1640
1649
1664
1671
1679
The money box system for savings in Amsterdam, 1907-1935, by G.N. BORST
1687
1693
14
CONTENTS
1704
1713
1719
1725
1734
1744
1748
Representaciones del caf en el acervo de numismtica del Museu Paulista USP, by Angela Maria Gianeze RIBEIRO
1752
Freiburg im echtland und die Mnzreformen der franzsischen Knige (16891726), by Nicole SCHACHER
1758
1765
1774
The political context of the origin and the exportation of thaler-coins from
Jchymov (Joachimsthal) in the first half of the sixteenth century, by Petr
VOREL
1778
The late sixteenth-century Russian forged kopecks, which were ascribed to the
English Muscovy Company, by Serguei ZVEREV
1783
1789
1796
CONTENTS
15
1807
1813
1821
1826
Numismatic research in Japan today: coins, paper monies and patterns of usage.
Paper money in early modern Japan: economic and folkloristic aspects, by
Keiichiro KATO
1832
1841
A study of medieval Chinese coins from Karur and Madurai in Tamil Nadu, by
KRISHNAMURTHY RAMASUBBAIYER
1847
1852
Silver fragments of unique Byid and amdnid coins and their role in the Kel
hoard (Czech Republic), by Vlastimil NOVK
1862
Numismatic evidence for the location of Saray, the capital of the Golden Horde,
by A.V. PACHKALOV
1869
Le regard des voyageurs sur les monnaies africaines du XVIe au XIXe sicles, by
Josette RIVALLAIN
1874
Les imitations des dirhems carrs almohades: apport des analyses lmentaires,
by A. TEBOULBI, M. BOMPAIRE & M. BLET-LEMARQUAND
1884
1890
Glass jetons from Sicily: new find evidence from the excavations at Monte Iato,
by Christian WEISS
1897
Medals
Joseph Kowarzik (1860-1911): ein Medailleur der Jahrhundertwende, by
Kathleen ADLER
1907
16
CONTENTS
1920
1931
1937
1945
The rediscovery of the oldest private medal collection of the Netherlands, by Jan
PELSDONK
1959
1965
Shines with unblemished honour: some thoughts on an early nineteenthcentury medal, by Tuukka TALVIO
1978
General numismatics
Dalliconografia delle monete antiche allideologia della nazione future.
Proiezioni della numismatica grecista di DAnnunzio sulla nuova monetazione
Sabauda, by Giuseppe ALONZO
1985
1993
The Count of Caylus (1692-1765) and the study of ancient coins, by Franois de
CALLATA
1999
2004
2012
2017
A prosopography of the mint officials: the Eligivs database and its evolution, by
Luca GIANAZZA
2022
2027
CONTENTS
17
2036
2044
Foundation of the Hellenic World. A new private collection open to the public,
by Eleni PAPAEFTHYMIOU
2046
2047
2058
2072
2082
2089
2100
From the electrum to the Euro: a journey into the history of coins. A multimedia
presentation by the Bank of Cyprus Cultural Foundation, by Eleni ZAPITI
2102
Highlights from the Museum of the George and Nefeli Giabra Pierides
Collection, donated by Clio and Solon Triantafyllides: coins and artefacts, by
Eleni ZAPITI & Evangeline MARKOU
2112
Index of Contributors
2118
RPC I, 1463*.
RPC I, 1458*.
10
RRC 541/2.
11
RPC I, 2569*.
12
E.g. RRC 492/2; 495/2a; 517/1a.
13
RRC 488/2.
14
RRC 490/2.
15
RRC 506/1.
MARIANGELA PUGLISI
legitimate filiation from Caesar (Pl. I, 8),16 to show his governing style, which was also founded
on the presence of a substitute, someone who could take over in case of necessity, and to state his
expectations of dynastic perpetuation.
The transposition of Augustuss intentions towards his son-in-law Agrippa to coin typologies seems systematic in various issues of precious metals struck in a short timespan, as a kind of
publicity campaign aimed at showing the functions shared by the two companions with analogous
or complementary roles. On the denarii of Platorinus (Pl. I, 9),17 Augustus and Agrippa are both
seated on a subsellium, a low seat used by the tribuni plebis, that seems to veil a peer power. The
relationship between them is reflected in Tacituss Annales, 18 where Agrippa is mentioned as socius eius potestatis, while the role of the appointed successor is recalled by Flavio Giuseppe who
defines him diadochos Kaisari.19
We can find a close parallel in a contemporaneous issue with their portraits respectively on the
Obv. and the Rev. with similar features.20 A similar depiction shows them in their official capacity
(Pl. I, 10):21 the former with a corona laurea, the latter with a rostral crown, showing a differentiation
of roles: peers, but distinct, wielding civil and military power. Also in another issue (Pl. I, 11),22 with
a reference to their censoria potestas (28 BC), a pendant with the tribunicia potestas expressed by
the typology of the subsellium, Agrippa and Augustus adopt the same standing position and clothing.
It remains to be established whether the aim of these similar representations was to evoke the
Castores and their alternating government, as it would be for the other heirs designated by Augustus, Gaius and Lucius Caesares,23 or to strengthen an idea of a putative filiation achieved thanks to
their family relationship, if we believe Augustus wished to present Agrippa as the one with whom
he would share his power and to whom he would entrust it after his own death.
In the year of Agrippas death his exaltation turns into commemoration.24 Agrippas celebration is conspicuous especially in the Roman Provincial coinage (Pl. I, 12)25 through his portrait
conjoined with the figure of Augustus in a sort of duality of power, which harks back to the double
office of the Republican consules.
A formal respect for Republican institutions, even if with some typological innovations, is
seen in the representation of the heirs chosen by Augustus, Agrippas sons Gaius and Lucius, often
depicted in the same ways as we saw Augustus and Agrippa earlier. An official presentation of the
heirs seems to be represented in the issue of 13 BC (Pl. I, 13);26 opposite Augustuss head they
flank the portrait of their mother Julia, the source, as Augustuss daughter, of legitimisation for her
husband Agrippa who, although absent from this coin, is implicitly evoked as the bearer of political power from Augustus to his still young children, the one who can ensure legitimate continuity
and act as a guarantee of stability. The two young Caesares, almost always seen as a couple (Pl.
I, 14),27 sometimes combined with Augustuss head on the Obv. (Pl. II, 15),28 are named consules
designati, as also Agrippa earlier,29 or as principes iuventutis (2-1 BC - AD 11) (Pl. II, 16).30
When Augustus is compelled to choose Tiberius as his Caesar, due to the death of all the other
designated heirs, his position is made official on coins mainly with his portrait opposed to that
16
Back-to-back portrait: RPC I, 515; confronted heads: RRC 534/2*;
statues: RPC I, 1650.
17
RIC I Augustus 406-407*. Puglisi forthcoming I.
18
Ann. 3,56,2.
19
Ant. Iud. 15,350.
20
RIC I, Augustus 408.
21
RIC I, Augustus 409; 414*.
22
RIC I, Augustus 400*.
23
Cass. Dio 55,9,9-10; Tac. Ann. 1,3.
24
Equestrian statue: RIC I, Augustus 412; Augustus crowning a statue of
Agrippa: 415 (Fraschetti 1990, p. 299-312: Agrippa, not Divus Iulius).
25
RPC I, 522-526*; 533; 942; 976; 2008; 2011; 2260.
26
RIC I, Augustus 404*.
27
RPC I ,212; 2118; 2428; 2564*; 2696.
28
RPC I, 107; 779; 1136; 2010A*.
29
RRC 234/2.
30
RIC I, Augustus 207*.
of Augustus,31 as the previous Caesares and in the same way as Agrippa Postumus,32 last son of
Agrippa, when he was appointed Caesar. The same scheme reproduces the immediate relationship between the figure of Tiberius once he had become Augustus, and his direct predecessor,
the Divus Augustus,33 renewing the tradition introduced by Antonius and Octavianus towards the
Divus Iulius.
Tiberius uses Augustan schemes to present his heirs, also in this case a couple, ready to take
his place in case of need. Some new typologies appear, such as the two Caesares standing with
spears (Pl. II, 17),34 a more or less veiled reference to the Dioscuri, the inspiration for an idea of
diarchic power. We find also the first appearance of the two Caesars seated on sellae curules as
peers, being both consules, the emblematic magistracy of Republican regime symbolised in fact
by the presence of the curule chair (Pl. II, 18).35
A sort of programmatic declaration of succession characterises one of the first issues struck by
Vespasianus: he appears on the Obv., while on the Rev. we can see his two sons Titus and Domitianus seated side by side on sellae curules, mentioned in the legend as CAESARES PRINcipes
IVVENtutis,36 to ratify their role as designated heirs.
Common under the Flavians is the adoption of numerous Augustean iconographic schemes or
those derived from Tiberiuss coinage (Pl. II, 19, 20),37 often with a hierarchical differentiation
between the two brothers, which reflects a difference of age and perhaps of roles.
If Hadrian was not in time to depict Antoninus Pius with him on his issues, unlike the first
designated Caesar, Aelius,38 Antoninus Pius abundantly used the opportunity offered by the coins
to show, insistently, the choice of the adoption of Marcus Aurelius.39
A peer relationship is expressed by the numerous joint issues in the names of Marcus Aurelius
and Lucius Verus: their double-representation and interchangeability reflects their double governing role of co-Augusti (Pl. II, 21);40 in a scene of liberalitas both the Emperors are represented
identically on sellae curules, 41 unlike the scene with Antoninus and his hierarchically differentiated Caesar. The dynastic intentions of Marcus Aurelius focused on Commodus42 once a dual
succession became impossible owing to the death of Commoduss twin and then of their younger
brother Annius Verus.43
Even clearer is the programmatic message of succession conveyed by Severan issues through
various schemes, sometimes derived from the past, in other cases without any forerunners (Pl.
II, 22, 23).44
During the third century various Emperors continue to depict themselves with these codified
schemes as in the scene of liberalitas associating the Augustus with the co-governor or the Caesar
or Caesars of different proportions to express their different hierarchical roles.45 On the other hand
the two Emperors Diocletianus and Maximianus Herculius, seated on sellae curules or standing
RIC I, Augustus 226.
RPC I, 1141.
33
RIC I, Tiberius 23.
34
RPC I, 68*.
35
RPC I, 342*; Puglisi 2004.
36
RIC II, Vespasian 23; on sellae curules: BMCRE II, pl 31.9.
37
Portraits: RIC II, Vespasian 283*; jugate: RPC II, 992; togati: RIC II,
Vespasian 331; with spears: 413; horsemen: 292*.
38
RIC II, Hadrian 987.
39
E.g. portraits: RPC Online 5850 II; confronted heads: 2370; togati:
14846; portrait and horseman: 14911; on sellae curules: BMCRE IV, pl. 30.6.
40
E.g. portraits: SNG von Aulock 761; confronted heads: SNG Levante
846; clasping hands: RIC III, M. Aurelius 1282; portrait and horseman: 477.
31
32
MARIANGELA PUGLISI
and clasping hands (Pl. II, 24),46 hint at a peer role, as the absence of any differentiation between
them in their joint portraits confirms.
Intentionally conciliatory is the unofficial representation of the usurper Carausius, shown as
a peer jugate with Maximianus and Diocletianus (Pl. II, 25),47 the authorised holders of power.
This is a case of false propaganda, depicting a situation not corresponding to reality.
Constantinus uses his own portrait associated on the Rev. with his Caesars with an evident
hierarchic differentiation.48 The self-representation on the sella curulis, of Republican memory,
of the Emperor alone or accompanied by Caesars or co-Augusti, ceases with Constantinus, as the
Augustuss seat changes to become the royal throne (Pl. II, 26),49 once exclusive to deities, and
never used by a living person, since it smacked of autocratic power. This new iconography would
soon also be adopted to express a shared power with one or two heirs (Pl. II, 27).50
Thanks to our diachronic examination of the male couple on Roman coinage, we have identified some main iconic schemes, clear iconographical topoi, often with variants, but generally embodying different nuances of the Republican idea of duality, that begins with the representation on
the same coin of two portraits, of Antonius and Iulius Caesar or of Octavianus and Iulius Caesar,
also adopted by the triumvirs, two by two, and incisively by Augustus and Agrippa.
The use of the two portraits en pendant on the two sides of a coin soon became established,
representing a constant on Roman coins, especially in two cases: either to depict the Emperor and
the Caesar or Caesares, when a couple of successors had been designated, or to show a certain
legitimate descent or to show the Emperor and the Divus, often the progenitor Augustus, in a sort
of search of legitimisation from a historical popular character of the past, as the Diadochs did
with Alexanders portrait or the Ptolemies with the first of the dynasty.
Another type of parallel is set up with two jugate heads with a double profile, as in some Republican issues51 on the Ptolemaic model.52
More frequently we find two confronted heads facing each other, a very common type throughout the Empire, above all to represent the two Caesars, often conjoined with the Emperors head
on the other side of the coin.
The Augustan representation of two heads back to back, used both for Augustus and the Divus
Iulius and for Augustus and Agrippa, did not continue afterwards.
Even rarer is the presence of the male bifrons,53 limited, as far as concerns living characters, to
the single case of Octavianus and Antonius.
In the depiction of two characters on the same coin, the choice of a seat seems very important
in representing the idea of power. The prevailing scheme consists of the Caesars or the Emperor
with the heir or the heirs seated on sellae curules in their role as consules, preferably during celebrations of liberalitas, acts of generosity to the community, where the characters are depicted
as peers in the same position and with the same pose, to underline their similar role, symbolised
by the curule chairs, in the same manner as the subsellium of Augustus and Agrippa denoted the
equal dignity of their office of tribuni plebis, and as the solium represented the autocratic power
assumed by Constantinus for the first time, the throne that soon after would again be extended to
make room for the heirs.
The standing male couples are usually the two Caesars introduced to the public during public
E.g. portraits: RIC VI, pl. 3.146b; Emperors riding: pl. 6.1; on sellae
curules: RIC V.2, pl. XII.15*.
47
RIC V.2, pl. XVIII.12*.
48
RIC VII, pl. 24.70.
49
RIC VII, pl. XVIII.44*. Puglisi forthcoming II.
46
52
53
ceremonies, as in the case of Gaius and Lucius consules designati, following the example of Augustus and Agrippa togati as censores expressing the idea of duality.
In the codification of the majority of these coin images, a fundamental role was played by
Augustus who, deriving signs and symbols both from the Hellenistic world and from Republican
imagery, readapted them to the new reality of the Principatus, with the consequence that - as we
have ascertained - many of his typological choices became iconographical topoi.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BMCRE = Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum.
BMCRE II = Mattingly, H. (19662), II, London.
BMCRE IV.2 = Mattingly, H. (19682), IV.2, London.
BMCRE V.1 = Carson, R. Hill, P. (1950), V.1, London.
BMCRE VI = Carson, R. (1962), VI, London.
Fraschetti, A. (20052), Roma e il principe, Roma-Bari.
Puglisi, M. (2004), Origine e tradizione iconica di unimmagine monetale: proposta di strutturazione di un lemma. La sella curulis, in: Travaini, L. / Bolis, A. (eds.), Limmaginario e il potere
nelliconografia monetale, Milano, pp. 55-78.
Puglisi, M. (forthcoming I), Il seggio e lideologia diarchica. Da Augusto e Agrippa alla fine
dellImpero, in: Tyrannis, Basileia, Imperium, Giornate seminariali in onore di Sebastiana N.
Consolo Langher, Messina.
Puglisi, M. (forthcoming II), La semantica del trono. Let romana: dalla Repubblica al tardoImpero, in: Prea, R. (ed.), Atti del Secondo Incontro Internazionale di Studio del Lexicon Iconographicum Numismaticae, Genova.
RIC = Roman Imperial Coinage.
RIC I2 = Sutherland, C. (19842), I, London.
RIC II = Mattingly, H. / Sydenham, E. (1962), II, London.
RIC III2 = Mattingly, H. / Sydenham, E. (19972), III, London.
RIC IV.1 = Mattingly, H. / Sydenham, E. (1962), IV.1, London.
RIC IV.3 = Mattingly, H. / Sydenham, E. / C. Sutherland (1949), IV.3, London.
RIC V = Mattingly, H. / Sydenham, E. / Webb, P. (1962), V.1-2, London.
RIC VI = Sutherland, C. / Carson, R. (1967), VI, London.
RIC VII = Sutherland, C. / Carson, R. (1966), VII, London.
RIC VIII = Sutherland, C. / Carson, R. (1981), VIII, London.
MARIANGELA PUGLISI
PLATE I
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
10.
9.
11.
13.
12.
14.
NB. The bibliographical references to the illustrations appear marked by an asterisk in the footnotes.
The coins are not shown at their actual size, in order to highlight the iconographic details.
Plate II
15.
16.
17.
19.
18.
20.
22.
21.
24.
23.
25.
26.
27.
NB. The bibliographical references to the illustrations appear marked by an asterisk in the footnotes.
The coins are not shown at their actual size, in order to highlight the iconographic details.