PREPARING THE INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

MFO (Major Final Output)- goods or services provided to external clients to achieve a common outcome.
In DepEd, What outputs are we providing to external clients/ stakeholders to achieve our mandate?
(Organizational outcomes)
Our organizational outcomes are reflected in our VMVGO. (Vision, Mission, Values, Goals Objectives)
MFOs should .. simply describe goods and services to be delivered (avoid using adjectives)
measurable, manageable, auditable
within dept./agency control
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIs)are the measures that are used to judge success in achieving outcomes or in
delivering the outputs.
PIs characterize performance in terms of Quantity (volume or output), Quality (how well output is
delivered),
Timeliness (rate at which output is delivered to clients) and Cost (amount or budget allocation
used to produce an output).
SAMPLE TEMPLATE:
Examples: MFO- Public Secondary Education Services
MFO
Objectives
Public
Second
ary
Educati
on
Service
s

Attained the required GSA for the

grade level and learning areas.

Performance Indicators
Quantity: Total No. of Sec. Students
Quality: Participation Rate
Completion rate
MPS in NAT
Filipino
English.
MPS in
NCAE

GSA in
Tech-Vocational Aptitude
Non-Verbal Ability

Actual
Results
45 students

78.01%

79.79%

Entrepreneurial Skills
Timeliness: End of the School Year
Cost:
Mvavanzado/063014

RPMS-INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

(For Teaching Personnel)
Name of Employee: __________________
Name of Rater:__________________
Position:_________________
Position:__________________
Review Period:June October 2015
Date of Review:October 20, 2015
Bureau/ Center/Service/ Division: Dept. of Education, Division of Negros Oriental
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs

Basic
1.
Secondar
y
Educatio
n
Services

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

Teachi A.Prepared lesson plans

and daily log of
ngactivities with
Learni
corresponding/appropr
ng
iate, adequate and
Proces
updated instructional
s
materials.

TIMELINE

Weigh
t
per
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

June
to
Octob
er
2015

15%

June
to
Octob
er
2015

10%

-Daily plans with complete

parts
-Each part with full description/
examples of what to do
-With SMART objectives
-Develop HOTS
-Attained the desired learning
competencies
-Budget of Work is
implemented for the rating
period
-IMs used are appropriate,
adequate and updated.
Learning goals are aligned with
K to 12 curriculum/ RBEC

(40%)

H.

I.

Facilitated learning in
Grade ___through
functional lesson
plans, daily logs and
innovative teaching
strategies.
Guided students on
the observance of

June
to

Teaching methods and

strategies provide for a wide
range of activities and
classroom interaction daily.
5%

Students observe classroom

rules and guidelines

RATING

ACTUAL RESULTS
Q
Ave.

___x.15

___x.10

SCORE

classroom rules

Octob
er
2015

Students are well-disciplined

inside and outside the
classroom.

D.Monitored safe and

motivating
environment,
cleanliness/orderliness

June
10%
to
Octob
er
2015
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

MFOs

Basic
Secondar
y
Educatio
n
Services

KRAs

2.Stud
ent
Outco
mes
A.
(20%)

OBJECTIVES

A. Maintained an
updated students
school records
Monitored and
evaluated students
progress through
different assessment
tools

TIMELINE

Weigh
t
per
KRA

June to
October
2015
Daily
Weekly
Quarterl
y

10%

10%

___x.05

Classroom is clean, safe and

conducive to learning.

___x.10

RATING For KRA 1

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency ,
Timeliness)

-School Records are intact

and updated periodically
-Assessment tools are
planned and varied to match
needs and styles of students
-Class records reflect bases
for grading/rating students
-____% of students with
portfolio projects
-Quarterly Exams are
prepared with Table of
Specifications (TOS)
-Content and skills are
congruent in the TOS
-Test questions are logically
sequenced
-Pretest and Post test are
administered in all subject
areas.

ACTUAL RESULTS
Q

E
Ave.

RATIN
G

___x.1
0
___x.1
0

SCORE

H. Conducted
remediation and
enrichment programs
and activities to
improve:
a. Reading
comprehension skills
of non-readers and
frustration level
readers
b. performance
indicators
4. Attained the
required GSA for
grade level and
learning areas

JulyOctober
2015

5%

-Remediation activities/
enrichment programs are
conducted
(No. of Pupils needing
remediation/ % of results)

___x.0
5

-% Dropout Rate_____
-%Failure Rate _____
- %Promotion Rate _____

July-Oct
2015

5%

Attained 75% mastery level

in _____________________
( subject )

___x.0
5

RATING FOR KRA 2

MFOs

Basic
Secondar
y
Educatio
n
Services

KRAs

3.Commu
nity
Involvem
ent
(10%)

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

1. Conducted
regular/quarterly
PTA meetings/
conferences

June
-October
2015

2. Visited/ called
parents for a
conference of
students needing
academic
monitoring/follow
-up within the

JuneOctober
2015

Weig
ht
per
KRA

3%

2%

PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency ,
Timeliness)

No. of PTA meetings

conducted

-No. of pupils needing

followup/monitoring(twice)
-No. of visits to parents/
conferences with parents
of students needing
follow-up within the rating

ACTUAL RESULTS
Q

E
Ave.

RATIN
G

___x.0
3

___x.0
2

SCORE

rating period

period

(SARDO)/less
performing pupils

-status/progress of
students being followedup
- ____ No. of saved
SARDO
-____% saved SARDO

3. Undertook/Initiat
ed projects
events/activities
with external
funding/sponsor
ship.

June to
October
2015

5%

-Two types of
projects/activities
undertaken w/ external
stakeholder funding/
sponsorship with full
documentation and report
on completion

___x.0
5

RATING FOR KRA 3

*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

MFOs

Basic
Secondar
y
Educatio
n
Services

KRAs

4.Professio 1.
nal
Growth and
Developme
nt
2.
(20%)

TIMELINE

Weig
ht
per
KRA

PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency ,
Timeliness)

Conducted
classroom-based
Action Research

JulyOctober
2015

5%

One Action Researches

done with
documentation on
completion of
intervention

___x.0
5

Initiated/Participate
d in cocurricular/curricular
activities within the
rating period.

JuneOctober
2015

5%

Two titles of curricular

and co-curricular
activities
initiated/participated.

___x.0
5

OBJECTIVES

ACTUAL RESULTS
Q
Ave.

RATIN
G

SCORE

3. Produced
publications/create
d work for school
paper

JuneOctober
2015

5%

Produce one
publications/created
work for school paper
within the rating period

4. Received special
awards/citation/
recognition for
exemplary
performance

JuneOctober
2015

5%

_____ ( no.) and level of

awards/recognition
received

___x.0
5

___x.0
5

RATING FOR KRA 4

Plus Factor

RATING FOR PLUS

FACTOR

COMMENTS/ SUGGESTIONS:
SUMMARY OF RATING
KRA 1
KRA 2

KRA 3
KRA 4
Plus Factor
OVERALL RATING

*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

SHIELA R. KLODZINSKI

____________________________
Ratee

EPIFANIA Q.

______________________________
CUEVAS
Rater

(Range) Numerical Rating Adjectival Rating

4.500 - 5.000
Outstanding
3.500 - 4.499
Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.490
Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499
Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499
Poor

Based: Deped Order No.2, s 2015

LELANIE T. CABRERA

________________________________
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority