Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CHAPTER 1
Page 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Brief description about study stretch
Bangalore is the largest city in the state of Karnataka. It is also the capital city of Karnataka.
Bangalore boasts of being one of the highly developed countries in India. The city of Bangalore
is connected through more than 3000 km of road network.
Outer Ring Road is a road that runs around most of the perimeter of Bangalore. This road was
developed by Bangalore Development Authority and different sections were opened
progressively between 1996 to 2002. The 62 km long Outer Ring Road connects all the major
highways around the city of Bangalore. It includes Tumkur Road (NH 4), Bellary Road (NH 7),
Old Madras Road (NH 4), Hosur Road (NH 7), Bannerghatta Road, Kanakapura Road (NH 209),
Mysore Road (SH-17) and Magadi Road.
Also it passes through major neighborhoods and sub-urbans such as Hebbal(NH7), Banaswadi,
Krishnarajapuram(NH4), Marathahalli, Madiwala(NH7), BTM Layout, JP Nagar, Banashankari,
Kengeri, Bangalore University, Nagarbhavi, Nandini Layout and Gokula.
Tumkur Road to the West of Bangalore and Old Madras Road to the East connects the city to the
National Highway 4 & Bellary road to the North and Hosur Road to the South of the city
connects the city to the National Highway 7.
HosurRoad provides connectivity to Mysore from Bangalore. These are majorly used roads of
the city and are sights of traffic jams on various occasions.The Ring Road also gives access to
the city of Coimbatore which is the second largest city in the state of Tamil Nadu.
This project is intended to implement Pavement Management System for whole Bangalore city
roads. But because of time constraints we have selected Outer Ring Road of Bangalore city from
Goragunte playa to Hebbala.
The reason for selecting this Outer Ring Road is that it connects major roads like National
Highways, State Highways and also passes through citys major roads. This Outer Ring Road
also carries major traffic and the IT, BT companies were concentrated more besides this road.
Page 2
The incorporation of both agency costs and road user costs in a life-cycle cost analysis.
The use of calibration parameters for broad-based applicability in diverse climates and
conditions.
The use as an appropriate design tool for pavements, if properly calibrated, especially for
developing countries, while borrowing design standards directly from the design
specifications of industrialized countries.
The data required for the HDM-4 analysis are listed in the table1. HDM-4 supports flexible
options for data analysis and results. Users can make printed or electronic reports. They can also
export data and results to standard database for other users. HDM-4 can produce the following
three types of output, which can assist road managers to make informed decisions.
Strategic road maintenance and development plans, produced from long-term predictions
Description
This file contains road network data such as basic road details,
geometrics, pavement history, pavement condition etc., This file
Page 3
Vehicle fleet
Road Works
HDM configuration
analysis.
To reflect the actual traffic flow pattern, speed flow on the road
and climatic conditions of the study area, the actual data
obtained from field studies has to be used.
Page 4
CHAPTER 2
METHODOLOGY
The main objective of the study is to develop the PMMS by using HDM-4 for the network to
produce planning and programming the maintenance works for the existing Arterial ring road.
These data collection plan was made according to the requirements of input for HDM-4.
Page 5
such
as
Hebbal(NH7),
Banaswadi,
Krishnarajapuram(NH4),
Marathahalli,
Page 7
The thickness of the GSB layer provided for overall Outer Ring Road is 200mm.
The thickness of the WMM layer is 250mm for Main road of the ORR and it varies from
100 to 275 in case of service roads.
The thickness of DBM layer is 80mm and in some stretches overlay has been carried out
having the thickness 80mm.
The actual thickness of the BC layer is 40mm. But this layer is overlayed in all locations
of ORR by the thickness of 40mm.
Page 8
In most of the locations BC layer is overlaid for three times after the original construction
of this BC layer.
BBD of standard make complying with equipment specification as given in IRC 81:1997
was used for the study.
A standard truck with 10500kg fitted with dual tyre inflated to a pressure and load was
checked at-least twice in a days work.
Before starting the survey, BBD was calibrated to ensure proper working of dial gauges
as per procedure stated in cl 4.3.4 of IRC 81:1997.
Page 9
Deflection measurements was taken in accordance with CGRA procedure and relevant
data entered in accordance with format provided in IRC 81:1997.
The measurement points in the longitudinal direction (i.e., along traffic direction) was
taken at 50m interval on the wheel path for left wheel path (LWP), middle wheel
path(MWP) and right wheel path(RWP).
The measurement covered both carriageway left wheel path middle wheel path and right
wheel path for three lane road.
The measurement points was taken at 60cm from pavement edge excluding paved
shoulder.
Before commencement of survey, the points was marked on the road with paint for easy
identification. The dual wheels of the truck was centred, the BBD probe inserted
between the dual tyres on the test point. The dial gauge leg was adjusted so that the beam
was levelled using the spirit level.
The locking pin was removed from the beam and the legs adjusted so that the plunger of
the beam was in contact with the stem of dial gauge. The beam pivot arms was checked
for free movement and initial dial gauge reading noted.
The truck was moved slowly and stopped at a distance of 270cm and intermediate dial
gauge reading was recorded when the rate of recovery is less that 0.025mm per minute.
The truck moved further 9m away and the final gauge reading was recorded.
The pavement temperature was recorded at least once every hour inserting thermometer
in standard hole and filling with glycerol as per Cl4.4 of IRC 81:1997.
Plasticity Index, moisture content and soil type of subgrade was determined by preparing
a test pit at the shoulder and collecting subgrade soil sample and testing in accordance
with IS:2720
Motorised traffic
Two wheeler
Three wheeler
Tractor
Cars
Light commercial vehicles
Bus/ truck/ road rollers
Heavy trucks (3 to 6 axles)
Oversized vehicles (>7 axles)
Page 11
3.6 Roughness
Deviations of surface from true planar surface with characteristic dimensions that affect vehicle
dynamics, ride quality, dynamic of loads and drainage, expressed inthe International Roughness
Page 12
Road Network data, Pavement Condition data, Vehicle fleet data and Traffic Volume data.
Method of analysis.
iii) Specify maintenance and improvement standards to be analyzed for each selected road
section. Set-up and run the analysis.
iv)Generate the reports and print the required outputs.
Page 13
NPV/cost ratio
The maximum value will shows the best alternative to keep the road in good condition. And also
it shows the economical option for maintenance of road about 10years period. Then the obtained
results are to be compared with actually required funds and Govt. Funding amount for M&R
works.
CHAPTER 3
e
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Soil type
Field MC
OMC
MDD
CBR values
SW
SW
SW
CL
CL
SW
SW
10.52
12.31
14.26
16.12
16.95
10.46
6.09
9.7
8.8
8.9
11.8
11.0
9.8
10.9
1.81
1.83
1.79
1.6
1.52
1.69
1.68
6.8
9.7
5.3
4.0
3.8
4.9
5.0
Page 15
12.9
1.51
4.7
Table 4.2.b Benkelman Beam Deflection details- From Goragunte playa to Hebbal Junction
I
Chainag
Deflectio
Pavemen
Temp
Moisture
Correc
t temp
correctio
correctio
t mean v
deflect
0.33
0.40
0.31
0.07
0.09
0.04
deflect
0.47
0.59
0.39
0.35
0.35
0.39
0.40
0.35
0.13
0.13
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.62
0.60
0.61
0.61
0.56
1
0
0.32
29
2
1
0.20
29
3
2
0.32
29
4
3
5
3.3
0.12
29
6
4
0.24
29
7
5
0.24
29
8
6
0.20
28
9
7
0.12
28
(Source: STUP consultants Pvt. Ltd.)
n
-0.06
-0.06
-0.06
-0.06
-0.06
-0.06
-0.07
-0.08
n factor
1.01
1.01
1.01
Under pass
1.08
1.06
1.01
1.08
1.03
Stdde
Correc
char
Based on the obtained deflection values we can design the overlay thickness to the section from
Goragunte playa to Hebbala junction.
Table 4.2.c Roughness value details- From Goragunte playa to Hebbala junction
ID
Chainag
Avg
Avg IRI
e
UI(mm)
1
0 to 1
2219
3.08
2
1 to 2
3405
4.51
3
2 to 3
2969
3.99
4
3 to 4
2910
3.92
5
4 to 5
2207
3.06
6
5 to 6
2428
3.33
7
6 to 7
1883
2.66
(Source: STUP consultants Pvt. Ltd.)
Landmark
Remark
Goragunte playa
Rail track, more value
BEL circle
Kuvempu circle
Hebbala junction
Page 16
Chainage
Avg
0 to 1.1
1.1 to 2.3
2.3 to 3.6
3.6 to 4.2
4.2 to 5.4
5.4 to 6.7
(%)
0.57
0.07
1.91
0.47
0.47
1.67
0.10
0.12
0.12
0.02
0.02
0.00
Ravel
7.2
8.2
0
0
1.5
1.5
Rut
10
15
14
18
12
16
Landmar
k
GGPalya
MES stop
BEL stop
Hebbal
Page 17
Lanes
Width(m)
Length(km)
Drainage type
Speed limit(kmph)
Super elevation(%)
Hor curve(deg/km)
No. of rise+fall/km
Rise+fall(m/km)
AADT year
NMT traffic
MT traffic
Shoulder width(m)
Pavement type
Climatic zone
Road class
AR
OR
Tr
1.0
3750
42
2014
10
15
40
Li
AR
OR
Tr
1.0
3426
45
2014
10
15
40
Li
AR
OR
Tr
1.5
3850
56
2014
10
15
40
Li
9.8
AR
OR
Tr
1.5
3950
55
2014
10
15
40
Li
9.8
AR
OR
Tr
1.5
5032
55
2014
10
15
40
Li
9.8
AR
OR
Tr
1.5
5151
49
2014
10
15
40
Li
9.8
AR
OR
Tr
1.5
6023
25
2014
10
15
40
Li
9.8
Table 4.4.1.b Road condition and inventory details of some typical sections
Last rehab year
Base thickess(mm)
0.04
AC
40
80
2002
1996
2010
2012
150
15
4
201
3.06
0.46
15
15
AC
40
80
2002
1996
2010
2012
150
15
4
201
3.92
0.47
10
15
AC
40
80
2002
1996
2010
2012
150
15
4
201
3.99
1.91
15
0.5
10
AC
40
80
2002
1996
2010
2012
150
15
4
201
2.66
1.61
15
15
AC
40
80
2002
1996
2010
2012
150
15
Page 18
thickness(mm)
Material type
Resil. Mod(GPa)
0.57
Currentsurface
3.08
Drainage condition
Texture depth(mm)
201
Rut depth(mm)
Edge break(m2/km)
Potholes(no./km)
Ravelled area(%)
Road history
Roughness(m/km)
201
3.33
0.47
15
15
AC
40
80
2002
1996
2010
2012
150
15
4
201
4.51
0.07
0.5
10
AC
40
80
2002
1996
2010
2012
150
15
Motor
Car
Car
LCV
BUS
Heavy
RTV
Tractor
Auto
Base type
cycle
Motor
NT
Small
OT
Large
Light
Medium
truck
Arti-
Light
Light
Motor
cycle
car
car
goods
bus
culated
bus
goods
cycle
PCSE
No. of wheels
No. of axles
Tyre type
0.5
2
2
Bias
1
4
2
Radial
1
4
2
Radial
1.5
4
2
Bias
1.5
4
2
Bias ply
trucks
1.5
8
5
Bias ply
2
4
2
Bias
1
8
4
Bias
1.5
3
2
Bias
Tyre base
ply
1.3
ply
1.3
ply
1.3
ply
1.3
1.3
1.3
ply
1.3
ply
1.3
ply
1.3
recaps
Tyre
15
15
15
12
20
25
15
15
15
retreadcost(%)
Annual km
Annual
work
10,787
300
32,077
1200
32,011
1200
41,831
1800
90,000
2250
99000
2200
60,000
2000
15,000
2000
45,000
2000
hours
Avg life(years)
Private use(%)
Passengers
10
100
1
10
100
2
10
100
3
9
0
0
8
0
40
10
0
0
9
0
20
8
0
0
6
0
3
Page 19
related
75
75
75
75
100
75
75
trips(%)
ESALF
Oper. Weight in
0
0.2
0
1.35
0
1.59
0.02
7
0.78
9.2
6.77
32
0.02
7
0.02
7
0
0.6
tonnes
Base type
Wheel
Wheels
Cycle
Bicycle
type
Pneumatic
Cart
Cart
Wooden
Rick
Rickshaw
Pneumatic
Dia
Oper. Wt
Play
Avg
Work
Annual
Passen
0.7
100
load(kg)
35
life
10
hours
150
km
2500
gers
1
1.0
1200
900
1300
4000
0.7
300
235
500
7200
Base type
Motor
Car NT
Car
LCV
Bus
Heavy
RTV
Tract
Auto
cycle
Motor
Small
OT
Large
Light
Medium
truck
Articulate
Ligh
or
Light
Motor cycle
cycle
car
car
Goods
Bus
Truck
t Bus
good
s
New
25226
313582
2609
383386
623899
756460
3000
2000
78470
377
1315
95
1312
2332
5440
6632
00
2332
00
2332
377
tyre
Fuel
18
18
15
12
12
12
12
12
15
Lubr. Oil
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
Mainten.
15
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
25
labour
Crew
27
105
54
67
27
wages/hr
Annual
Interest
Passenger
19
39
30
24
24
24
10
vehicle
Replace
Work
Time/hr
Passenger
Non-work
time/hr
Page 20
20
holding/hr
Cycle
Cart
Rickshaw
Base type
Purchase
Crew
Passenger
Cargo
Energy
Annual
Bicycle
Animal cart
Rickshaw
cost
1200
25000
4000
wages/hr
0
15
1
time/hr
0
0
15
holding
0
0
0
(per MJ)
0
0
0
Int(%)
9
9
9
Time
8.00 to 13.00
13.00 to 17.00
17.00 to 22.00
22.00 to 8.00
% of AADT
29.88
19.78
27.54
22.78
semi arid
-40
0.33
90
Tropical
above 18deg C
5deg C
45
Page 21
0
0
30
Road type
Ultimate
capacity(PCSE/lane/h)
Free flow capacity
Normal capacity
Jam speed(km/hr)
Accident Rate(in number per 100 million veh Fatal
Injury
km)
Damage
annaxr
Speed related
Desired speed multification
factor
Calib factor
2L & 3L
2400
0.2
0.8
25
10
40
10
0.7m/s2
1
1
Page 22
Intervention criteria
Work item
Treatment
2
OR improvement
activity
Routine maintenance
Rs/m area
Potholes>=4 No.s
Crack area>= 3%
Every year
IRI>=6.0
Patch work
Crack repair
Drainage cleaning
Microsurfacing
Thin overlay
Thick overlay
Strengthening and
IRI>=6.0
IRI>=6.0
IRI>=6.0
12kg/m2
30mm BC
40mm BC
75mm BC
rehabilitation
Lane addition
Volume/capacity >=0.8
Preventive maintenance
width
Type of maintenance
Work item
OR improvement
Base Alternative
activity
Routine maintenance
Patch work
Crack repair
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Alternative 4
Alternative 5
Preventive maintenance
Drainage cleaning
Microsurfacing @
Thin overlay
Thick overlay
Strengthen & overlay
Lane Addition
12kg/m2
30mm BC
40mm BC
75mm BC
3.0m wide lane,
Volume/capacity >=0.8
CHAPTER 5
Page 23
125
110
140
80
140
150
250
cost
Segment
Pothole
(No./km)
1
0 to 1.1
0.57
5.50
0.10
2
1.1 to 2.3 0.07
0.00
0.12
3
2.3 to 3.6 1.91
0.33
0.12
4
3.6 to 4.2 0.47
0.42
0.02
5
4.2 to 5.4 0.47
0.42
0.02
6
5.4 to 6.7 1.67
0.00
0.00
The above table shows the various types of distresses on
Ravel %
Rut in Landmark
mm
7.2
10
8.2
15
0
14
0
18
1.5
12
1.5
16
the flexible pavement
GGPalya
MES stop
BEL stop
Hebbal
in terms of
percentage of cracks out of total area of the pavement section, rutting in terms of average mm per
km. And ravelling in terms of area of weared surface out of total area of the pavement section.
Page 24
Low Density
M Medium Density
H-
High Density
Patching
Severity
L - Low Severity= Patch is in good condition and satisfactory. Ride quality is rated as low
severity or better
M Medium Severity= Patching is moderately deteriorated, or ride quality is rated as medium
severity, or both
H - High Severity= Patching is badly deteriorated, or ride quality is rated as high severity, or
both, needs replacement soon.
Rut Depth
SeverityL - Low Severity= Rut Depth between 6mm to 13mm
Severity= Rut Depth between 13mm to 25mm
between >25mm
Density
L - Low Density= Percentage of Area between 0-10%
M Medium Density= Percentage of Area between 10-20%
Page 25
H-
M - Medium
High Severity= Rut Depth
Chainage
0 to 1.1
1.1 to 2.3
2.3 to 3.6
3.6 to 4.2
4.2 to 5.4
5.4 to 6.7
Avgcrack(%)
M
L
H
L
L
H
Avgpatch(%) Pothole
H
L
M
M
M
L
M
M
M
L
L
L
Page 26
Ravel
H
H
L
L
M
M
Rut(mm)
L
M
L
H
L
H
Landmar
k
GGPalya
MES stop
BEL stop
Hebbal
Segment
0 to 1.1
1.1 to 2.3
2.3 to 3.6
3.6 to 4.2
4.2 to 5.4
5.4 to 6.7
Crack DV
16
6
38
6
6
33
Patch D V
38
4
7
7
8
3
Total D V
54
10
45
13
14
36
Page 27
Corrected D V
36
10
30
11
12
20
PCI
64
90
70
89
88
80
8000
AADT (vehicles/day)
7500
GGP TO RAIL
HEBLB TO HEBLJ
KVM TO HEBLB
MSR TO KVMP
NURS T JNCTN
NURS TO LAKE
RAIL TO MSR
7000
6500
6000
5500
5000
4500
4000
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
3000
2014
3500
Year
From the above graphs we can observe that no effect on the motor vehicles growth rate. This is
because there is a normal growth rate of motor vehicles. And from the graph we can see that
there is a rapid growth rate of motor vehicles near the Hebbal Junction. This is due to the passing
of NH-7(Bellary-Hyderabad). And also the presence of various IT, BT companies and Airport
road will connect through this junction. So from these observations we can predict that there may
be rapid increase in traffic growth rate near the Hebbal junction. And the any alternative
maintenance activities will not affect the traffic growth rate from GGPalya to Hebala junction.
4600
AADT (v ehicles/day)
4500
Alternativ e 1
Alternativ e 2
Alternativ e 3
Alternativ e 4
Alternativ e 5
Base Alternativ e
4400
4300
4200
4100
4000
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
3800
2014
3900
Year
From the AADT year by section we can say that there is no or very less effect on the traffic
growth for the any section considered for the matter of traffic growth is considered. Here from
Page 30
Altenative 2
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
Alternative 4
Alternative 5
Base Alternative
14
IRIav (m /k m )
12
10
8
6
4
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2016
2015
2014
2017
Year
From the above graph we can observe that alternative 4 is the best maintenance strategy which
will serve for long time without need of any other alternative maintenance treatment. Other than
that alternative maintenance treatment is that Base alternative which includes crack repairs, patch
works and drainage cleaning every year is the suitable alternative measure compared to
alternative 1,2,3 and 5.
Alternativ e-1
Alternativ e-2
Alternativ e-3
Alternativ e-4
Alternativ e-5
Base Alternativ ee
6
5
4
3
Year
Page 31
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
@Total Area of
Cracking
(ACRA)
% Cracking
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
10
Year
The graph is plotted by taking year on X-axis and crack percentage on Y-axis. The above graphs
shows the progress of percentage of crack area. All the alternatives except 4 and base alternative
have the same effect on the progress of crack value over a period of time. So this should be
avoided by adding some other suitable alternatives.
Alternative 4
Page 32
@Total Area of
Cracking
(ACRA)
80
% Cracking
70
60
50
40
30
20
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
10
Year
Above graph shows that alternative 4 will reduces all the percentage of cracks for a long period
of time. Actually there is a less percentage of crack is there in the pavement sections. But it will
increases over a period of time. In order to avoid this progress we have to apply some alternative
maintenance strategy that is strengthening and rehabilitation work.
Base alternative
Progression of Cracking over time
(after works values)
100
90
@Total Area of
Cracking
(ACRA)
80
% Cracking
70
60
50
40
30
20
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
10
Year
Here in the above graph alternative 4 is the best option to keep the crack projection at minimum
level. And also we can see that both alternative and base alternative are to be implemented as a
maintenance activity. So that we can manage the pavement for long period of time. Also we can
say that both base alternative and any one of the above alternative is to be considered for the
Page 33
90
@Total Area of
Cracking (ACRAaw)
@Area of Potholing
(APOTaw)
@Area of Edge Break
(AVEBaw)
@Area of Ravelling
(ARVaw)
@Total Damaged
Surface Area (ADA...
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
10
Year
The above graph represents the percentage of surface damage for a given period of time about 10
years. Even after the alternative work carried. From the above graph we can say that all the
alternative except alternative 4 and Base alternative have same surface damage percentages.
Alternative 4
Progression of Damaged Surface Area over time
(after works v alues)
100
90
@Total Area of
Cracking (ACRAaw)
@Area of Potholing
(APOTaw)
@Area of Edge Break
(AVEBaw)
@Area of Ravelling
(ARVaw)
@Total Damaged
Surface Area (ADA...
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
10
Year
This is one of the suitable alternative among all other alternative maintenance strategies. By
applying the alternative 4 that is strengthening and rehabilitation work. We can achieve better life
of the pavement section. This will reduces all the distresses rapidly and keeps minimum distress
over a period of time. This alternative is to be provided along with the base alternative. Then
Page 34
90
@Total Area of
Cracking (ACRAaw)
@Area of Potholing
(APOTaw)
@Area of Edge Break
(AVEBaw)
@Area of Ravelling
(ARVaw)
@Total Damaged
Surface Area (ADA...
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
10
Year
This graph is also same as that of above showing the variation in the surface damage percentage
value. But the ravelling area is more for the various sections. It should be avoided by applying
only the alternative 4 along with the base alternative.
Page 35
Roughness (m /km )
4.5
LN_01
LN_02
LN_03
LN_04
LN_05
LN_06
LN_07
4
3.5
3
2.5
Year
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
1.5
2014
he above graph shows the roughness value for the various sections of the pavement. The graph is
drawn by considering roughness value versus year for the various link Ids. But for the link 1
there is increase in roughness value. Because for this section we have not given the alternative
maintenance strategy. So the roughness value has increased from origin value to the maximum
extent.
Page 36
CHAPTER 6
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
6.1 Program level analysis
The program level analysis selects a combination of treatments for sections by optimizing an
objective function under budget constraints. It generates the same type of reports as project level
analysis, such as traffic reports, pavement distress conditions, works effects, road-user effects,
and costs. Furthermore, it compares outputs by different categories under constrained budgets or
optimized conditions. The reports generated in program level analysis are (Kerali, 2000a):
optimum section alternatives for varying levels of budgets
a pavement surface condition summary by link ID (state route number) or road class (interstate,
major collector, minor arterial, or principal arterial)
average roughness (weighted by section length) by link ID, pavement surface, or road class
average speed by link ID, pavement surface, or road class
volume/capacity ratio by link ID, pavement surface, or road class
Page 37
Details
NPV
1
Section 1
ORR4,5,6
Section 2
RM
ORRRM
1, 3
Section 3
ORR-2
RM
Micro
Thin
surface
Overlay
Micro
Thin
Strengthen&
surface
overlay
rehabilitation
Micro
Thin
surface
overlay
5
1.34
Lane addition
Widening
2.65
S&R
1.2
Project Alternatives
Section
Section 1
RM
Section 2
RM
Section 3
RM
Proj NPV
Micro
Thin
surface
overlay
Micro
Thin
Strengthen
surface
overlay
Rehabilitation
Micro
Thin
Strengthen
surface
overlay
Rehabilitation
2.85
3.08
4.72
&
&
Widening
Lane Addition
3.85
Initial
Alternative
Avg IRI
AADT
0 to 1
4583
Base Alternative
3.32
0.00
0.00
6 to 7
5435
Alternative 4
1.80
5.68
1.47
3 to 4
4440
Alternative 4
1.98
5.68
2.13
2 to 3
4321
Alternative 4
2.00
5.68
1.20
5 to 6
7016
Alternative 4
1.71
5.68
1.33
Page 39
5786
Alternative 4
1.85
5.68
1.24
1 to 2
3751
Alternative 4
2.09
4.06
3.17
2.11
32.46
10.54
Optimum section alternative means for a particular section suitable maintenance activity is to be
selected based on economic analysis. Also NPV will shows which section will gives maximum
benefit among various pavement sections considered.
Page 40
CHAPTER 7
CONCLUSION
1) Maintenance strategy can be best judged based on economic analysis.
2) HDM-4 is used for developing the PMS.
3) The study demonstrated, that use of HDM-4 will provide required management information if
carefully adopted.
4) Use of HDM-4 showed better result than PCI rating scale.
5) For the present section, Strengthening and rehabilitation is better choice compared to other
alternatives.
Page 41
Page 42
References
1) SanjivAgarwal, Prof.S.S.Jain and Dr.M.Parida(2004) Development of pavement management
system for Indian national highway network IRC publication, paper 502,pp 271-326.
2) R.Sudhakar(2009) Pavement maintenance management system for urban roads using HDM4 IGS Chennai Chapter, student paper competition 2009.
3) GeethuSaji, Sreelatha T and B.G Sreedevi(2013) A study on pavement performance and
overlay design using HDM-4 IJIRSET, Vol. 2, Issue 8, August 2013.
4) S.S.Naidu, Dr.P.K.Nanda et al.,(2003) Pavement maintenance management system for urban
roads using software HDM-4 a case study Indian Road Congress, Vol.66.3, pp 641-669.
5) Kunal Jain, Sukhvir Singh Jain et al.,(2013) Selection of optimum maintenance and
rehabilitation strategy for multilane highways IJTTE, 2013.
6) Maher Abdel Fatah Al-Hallaq (2004) Development of a Pavement Maintenance Management
System for Gaza City thesis report, Jan 2006.
7) Indian Road Congress(1993) Manual on economic evaluation of highway projects in India,
IRC:SP 30, New Delhi.
Page 43
Acknowledgement
Thanks to my Guide Prof.T.G.Sitharam, Dr.Venkat Chilukuri , and
Dr.Krishnamurthy.
Also I am grateful to Dr.Gururaja for providing video camera with GPS and
B.D.A. members for providing the data required for the project work
prepared by the STUP consultants.
Page 44