Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
In our first book, Type Talk, we offered comprehensive profiles of the sixteen
personality types, detailing their behavior throughout their lives- as children, parents,
mates, even as senior citizens. The profiles that follow focus primarily on the
relationships and situations of the workplace.
Be careful: The danger in creating typological profiles is that they are usually
viewed as rigid boxes encompassing an unvarying and static set of characteristics. That
can make them more confining than liberating, ironically defeating the whole point of
Typewatching, which is to allow room for you to be yourself and for others to be
themselves. We do not intend these profiles to be the final statements; rather they are
intended as pints of reference for insight into yourself and others. Remember the Third
Commandment of Type watching: It is only a theory; it takes real life to validate it.
There are several ways to validate your profile. First and foremost is to highlight
those pats with which you agree and note the parts with which you disagree. Next, you
might consider soliciting feedback about your profile from those who know you well-
your mate, your staff, your co-workers, perhaps even your kids. These individuals will
confirm or counter what you saw about yourself in the profile; where they disagree with
you will provide the basis for a highly insightful discussion about others’ perceptions of
you. Furthermore, you might want to read the profile of your four-letter opposite – the
ENFJ profile, for example, if you are an ISTP. Such a reading should provide a sharp
contrast you your own preferences, helping to put your own profile into perspective.
Typological profiles have been accused from time to time of being like
astrological horoscopes: general statements broad enough to encompass everyone. That’s
simply not true. These profiles are based on sound theory and empirical observation of
human behavior.
Most typological profiles previously written have been more positive than
negative. This concurred with the affirming nature of Typewatching in general: I is a
psychological model based on oriented profiles n the following pages break that trend.
Because the workplace, with its stresses and demands, often engenders a variety of
behaviors that are not all positive, and because people often get tripped up by the
negative side of a boss describing the various weaknesses that can plague each type. We
believe it is important to know the potential stumbling pints if you are to be well
equipped to deal with the demands of the workplace.
Still, there are many strengths to be found in each profile. The more we can
integrate those strengths and recognize the shortfalls, the more we can live with-and even
prosper from- each other’s differences.