Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Document(1)
1.
Narrowed by
Court: Colorado
| About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright 2015 | LexisNexis.
Julianna Wade
| Positive
Campbell v. Meyer
Court of Appeals of Colorado, Division Two
September 22, 1994, Decided
No. 93CA1565
Reporter
883 P.2d 617; 1994 Colo. App. LEXIS 288; 18 BTR 1608
Core Terms
ballot title, moot, voters, election, issues, fiscal year,
cross-appeal, summary judgment, violates, general
election, appellate court, capital letters, ballot measure,
legal effect, trial court, first full, plaintiffs', defeated,
grounds, printed, subsidy, tourism, dollar
Case Summary
Procedural Posture
Plaintiff taxpayers appealed an order of the District
Court of the City and County of Denver (Colorado),
which granted summary judgment to defendants, state
and secretary of state, on the taxpayers' suit alleging
that the ballot title for Colo. House Bill 93-1330 was
improper and that Colo. House Bill 93-1330 was
unconstitutional. The state cross-appealed a summary
judgment for plaintiff requiring the entire ballot to be
capitalized.
LexisNexis Headnotes
Civil Procedure > ... > Justiciability > Mootness > General
Overview
Constitutional Law > ... > Case or Controversy >
Mootness > General Overview
Overview
Colo. Const. art. X, 20, known as the Taxpayer's Bill of
Rights (TABOR), was approved by the state's voters.
Julianna Wade
Page 2 of 3
883 P.2d 617, *617; 1994 Colo. App. LEXIS 288, **1
become moot because of subsequent events. A case is
moot when a judgment, if rendered, would have no
practical legal effect upon an existing controversy.
Civil Procedure > ... > Justiciability > Mootness > General
Overview
Opinion
[*618] In this action for declaratory relief and permanent
Julianna Wade
Page 3 of 3
883 P.2d 617, *618; 1994 Colo. App. LEXIS 288, **3
- the first on grounds that it did not have jurisdiction, and
the second on grounds that the substance of the ballot
title did not violate TABOR. Plaintiffs prevailed on their
third claim and the trial court ordered the ballot title to be
printed in capital letters. The voters subsequently
defeated the measure at the November 2, 1993, general
election.
Defendants contend that because the voters defeated
the measure, the case is moot. We agree.
HN1 Appellate courts will not render opinions on the
merits of appeals when issues presented in litigation
become moot because of subsequent events. A case is
moot when a judgment, if rendered, would have no
practical legal effect upon an existing controversy.
American Drug Store, Inc. v. Denver, 831 P.2d 465
(Colo. 1992).
Julianna Wade