Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A Project Stage I on
C E RT I FI CAT E
This is to certify that Mr. Adil Faqi Momin, has successfully completed the Project StageI Entitled Experimental analysis of Domestic refrigerator compatible with phase change
material, using R290 and R600 blend as refrigerant under my supervision, in the Partial
fulfillment of Master of Engineering Mechanical Engineering (Heat Power Engineering)
of University of Pune.
Date :
Place :
Pune
Prof. M. H. Attal
Guide
External Examiner
CONTENTS
Serial No
Description
Page No
Acknowledgment
List of Figure
ii
List of Table
ii
Nomenclature
iii
ABSTRACT
iv
INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
12
Due to Refrigerant
1.6
13
LITERATURE REVIEW
15
20
METHODOLOGY
21
4.1
Experimental setup
21
4.2
Simulation
21
22
GANTT CHART
23
REFERENCES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I take this opportunity to express my thanks to my guide Prof. M. H. Attal for his
inspiration and timely guidance in the completion of my work successfully. I would also
like to express my sincere thanks to our respected Coordinator Prof. V. N. Kapatkar, Head
of PG studies Prof. Dr. Y. P. Reddy and Principal Prof. Dr. S. D. Lokhande for giving
their vital instructions, necessary directives and valuable advice in the various phases of
this seminar work.
Date
/ 2015
Place : Pune
List of Figure
Figure No
Figure Name
Page No
10
11
21
Gang Chart
23
List of Table
Table No
1
Table Name
Month wise plan of work
Page No
22
NOMENCLATURE
Symbol
Atm
CFCs
COP
GWP
h
hfg
HCFCs
HCs
HFCs
ODP
P
PI
Pr
RE
SVFR
T
VRC
VCC
W
Meaning
atmosphere
chlorofluorocarbons
coefficient of performance
global warming potential
enthalpy, kg kJ-1
latent heat of condensation, kJ kg-1
hydro chlorofluorocarbons
hydrocarbons
hydro fluorocarbons
ozone depletion potential
pressure, MPa
Power input (kW)
Pressure ratio
refrigerating effect, kJ kg-1
suction vapour flow per kW of refrigeration, L s-1
temperature, C or K
volumetric refrigerating capacity, kJ m-3
Volumetric cooling capacity(kJ/m3)
isentropic compression work, kNm kg-1
ABSTRACT
In developing countries like India there exists a widespread general problem of frequent
power cuts, which gives rise to spoilage of perishable items such as medicine and food
stuff due to lack of a passive cold retention system.. Moreover, there exists the pressing
need of the hour to incorporate ecofriendly practices from the grass root level, while at
the same time conserving energy and increasing efficiency.
The aim of the project is to tackle this problem by developing a domestic refrigerator
system capable of maintaining the cooling effect for more than 15 hours without use of
electrical power and being compact as well as cost-effective. Second objective is to
reduce
the
global
warming
potential
caused
by
HFC
refrigerant,
R134a
1. INTRODUCTION
In nature, heat transfer occurs from the region of higher temperature to lower temperature
without requiring any external devices. The reverse process cannot occur by itself. The
transfer of heat from lower temperature to higher temperature requires special devices
called refrigerators. Refrigerator works on Vapour compression refrigeration Cycle.
Vapour compression refrigeration system is a system which is used to transfer heat from
low temperature energy reservoir to the high temperature reservoir by the use of working
fluid known as a refrigerant. It is a system which uses the high grade energy results in the
increase of coefficient of performance. Vapour compression refrigeration system which
consists of certain parts such as Compressor, Evaporator, and Condenser and Expansion
svalve. It has smaller size for the given capacity of refrigeration. This refrigeration
system can be employed Over a large range of temperature and the coefficient of
performance of this refrigeration system is quite high. To further increase the coefficient
of performance, the PCM (Phase change material) can be used in the evaporator and to
get the lowest temperature of evaporator the PCM can also be used. It has the main
advantage that it has the less running cost.
1.1 Introduction to Vapour Compression Refrigeration System
Vapour compression refrigeration system is the most commonly used among all
refrigeration systems. In this system, the working fluid is mentioned in the state of liquid
and vapour. It must readily evaporate and condense or change alternately between the
vapour and liquid phase without leaving the system. Figure 1 illustrates the main
components of the vapour compression refrigeration system namely compressor,
condenser, expansion device, and evaporator. The refrigerant vapour at low temperature
and low pressure enters the compressor (state 1) where it is compressed isentropically to
high temperature and high pressure. The high temperature refrigerant vapour then enters
the condenser (state 2) where it is condensed to high pressure liquid.
options for PCMs as well as over view of modeling methods and applications. Previous
research has been performed hybridizing VCC systems for building applications. This
research has utilized passive latent TES units which peak shave high demand periods by
charging a large PCM tank during periods of low energy demand, active sensible TES
units which actively manage a large tank of chilled fluid during a duty cycle, or active
latent TES charged by a dedicated chiller in conjunction with passive building
capacitance TES. Simple models are used to describe these systems which use either a
single lumped capacitance approach or a stratified approach, which separates a large TES
tank into two temperature regions with a very large gradient in between. Limited research
has been performed hybridizing refrigerated transportation systems, although it has been
identified as a promising choice for reducing energy consumption in such systems. One
study explored cooling a cargo space experimentally utilizing a large onboard passive
TES tank that is charged while the vehicle is at rest. While novel, It would be possible to
reduce the size of this unit by including the refrigeration system onboard powered by the
main engine Lo actively manage the state or charge. Additionally, there is very little
mention modeling in this or any refrigerated transport work. In order to better aid the
design of both standalone TES units and hybridized VCC systems, the current work
focuses on developing generalizable and detailed thermal model of a hybrid VCC system
with an active TES unit. This work focuses primarily on applications to systems with
highly transient loadings. A prime example of such an application is refrigerated
transport; however the strategies and models can be applied to hybridize any VCC
system.
1.3 Phase Change Material
Any type of materials to be used for PCM in TES systems should have high latent heat
and high thermal conductivity. They should have a melting/freezing temperature lying in
the practical range of operation, melt/freeze congruently within minimum sub cooling
and be chemically stable, non-toxic, less costly and non-corrosive.[5]
1.3.1 Working of PCM:
The external heat supplied to a PCM is used up in breaking the internal bonds of lattice
and thereby it absorbs a large amount of latent heat at phase changing temperature. Now,
when the PCM cools down, temperature goes below phase change temperature (known as
sub-cooling or under-cooling) to overcome the energy barrier required for nucleation of
second phase. Once phase reversal starts, temperature of PCM rises (due to release of
latent heat) and subsequent phase reversal takes place at phase change temperature by
releasing back the latent heat to environment. Requirement of sub-cooling or undercooling for phase reversal is an significant property of PCM governing its applicability in
particular application. Latent heat of PCM is many orders higher than the specific heat of
materials. Therefore PCM can store 2-3 times more heat or cold per mass or by volume
than heat can be stored as sensible heat in water. As heat exchange takes place in narrow
temperature range the phenomenon can also be used for temperature smoothening.
1.3.2 PCM Classification
Figure 2 shows the varieties of phase change heat storage materials: divided as organic
and inorganic materials. Organic materials are further classified as paraffin and
nonparaffins. (fatty acids, eutectics, and mixtures). Experiments (melting and freezing
cycles) using these materials showed that they crystallize with little or no sub cooling and
are usually non-corrosive and very stable.
Metallic includes the low melting metals and metal eutectics. Because of its larger
weight, metallics are not of prime importance However, when volume is a consideration,
they are likely candidates because of the high heat of fusion per unit volume. They have
high thermal conductivities. A major difference between the metallic and other PCMs is
their high thermal conductivity. Some of the features of these materials are low heat of
fusion per unit weight, high heat of fusion per unit volume, high thermal conductivity,
low specific heat and relatively low vapor pressure.
A eutectic is a minimum-melting composition of two or more components, each of which
melts and freeze congruently forming a mixture of the component crystals during
crystallization. Eutectic always melts and freezes without segregation since they freeze to
an intimate mixture of crystals, leaving little opportunity for the components to separate.
On melting both components liquefy simultaneously, again with separation unlikely.
Organic materials are categorized as paraffin and non-paraffin materials. These materials
include congruent melting; means melt and freeze repeatedly without phase segregation
and consequent degradation of their latent heat of fusion.
Paraffin are chemically known as hydrocarbons which are generally found to be as wax at
room temperature whereas non-paraffin encompasses fatty acids, glycols, esters and
alcohols etc. Paraffin consists of a mixture of mostly straight chain n-alkanes CH3
(CH2)CH3. The crystallization of the (CH3) - chain release a large amount of latent
heat. Both, the melting point and latent heat of fusion, increase with chain length.
Paraffin qualifies as heat of fusion storage materials due to their availability in a large
temperature range. System-using paraffin usually has very long freezemelt cycle. Apart
from some several favorable characteristic of paraffin, such as congruent melting and
good nucleating properties, they show some undesirable properties such as low thermal
conductivity, non- compatible with the plastic container and moderately flammable. All
these undesirable effects can be partly eliminated by slightly modifying the wax and the
storage unit. Non-paraffin materials are flammable and should not be exposed to
excessively high temperature, flames or oxidizing agents.
Some of the features of these organic materials are high heat of fusion, inflammability,
low thermal conductivity, low flash points, varying level of toxicity, and instability at
high temperatures.
Fatty acids have high heat of fusion values comparable to that of paraffins. Fatty acids
also show reproducible melting and freezing behavior and freeze with no supercooling.
The general formula describing all the fatty acid is given by CH3(CH2)2n COOH Their
major drawback, however, is their cost, which are 22.5 times greater than that of
technical grade paraffins. They are also mild corrosive. Some fatty acids are of interest
to low temperature latent heat thermal energy storage applications.
By far the best-known PCM is water. It has been used for cold storage for more than 2000
years. Today, cold storage with ice is state of the art and even cooling with natural ice and
snow is used again. For temperatures below 0 C, usually water-salt solutions with a
eutectic composition are used.
Fig.3. Classes of materials that can be used as PCM and their typical range of melting
temperature and melting enthalpy [10]
Several material classes cover the temperature range from -100 C to about 130 C.
Paraffins, fatty acids, and sugar alcohols are organic materials. Salt hydrates are salts
with a large and defined amount of crystal water. Clathrates are crystalline structures in
which molecules of one type are enclosed in the crystal lattice of another. Clathrate is
also recognized as a gas hydrate when the enclosed molecule is from a gas and the
surrounding crystal structure is water. They cover a temperature range from about 0 C to
30 C. At temperatures above 150 C, different salts and their mixtures can be applied.
Eutectic water-salt solutions have melting temperatures below 0 C, because the adding
up of the salt decreases the melting temperature, and usually good storage density.
Eutectic compositions solidify simultaneously out of the liquid at the freezing point.
Therefore, none of the phases can be separated and sink down due to density difference.
Also the eutectic compositions show a melting temperature and good storage density. The
thermal conductivity of eutectic water-salt solutions is similar to that of water and they
can subcool like water. Ethylene glycol and propylene glycol resists freezing. When
dissolved in water glycols disrupt hydrogen bonding when dissolved in water. Pure
glycols freeze at about 12 C but when mixed with water molecules they form a solid
crystal structure and therefore the freezing point of the mixture is depressed considerably.
The minimum freezing point is observed when the ethylene glycol percent in water is
about 60%.
1.3.3 Desirable Properties of PCM
The desirable properties of PCM for its application in refrigeration systems are as
follows.
1. High latent heat of fusion per unit volume so that a lesser amount of material
stores a given amount of energy.
2. High specific heat that provides additional sensible heat storage effect and also
avoid sub-cooling.
3. High thermal conductivity so that the temperature gradient required for charging
the storage material is small.
4. High density so that a smaller container volume holds the material.
5. A melting point is desired operating temperature range.
6. The PCM should be non-poisonous, non-flammable and non-explosive
7. Reproducible phase change, also called cycling stability to use the storage
material as many times for storage and release of heat as required by an
application.
8. No corrosiveness.
9. Also, it should be economically viable to make the system cost effective.
1.4 Refrigerant, Air Conditioner, Heat Pump and Effect on Ozone Layer Depletion
Refrigeration, air conditioning and heat pump applications represent the sector which is
the largest consumer of refrigerant chemicals. Estimates are difficult to give but as an
average for the developed countries share in electricity use is thought to be between 1020%.the economic impact of refrigeration technology is much more significant than
generally believed; 300 million tones or goods are continuously refrigerated. While the
yearly consumption of electricity may be huge, and where the investment in machinery
and equipment may approach 100000 million dollar. The value of the products treated by
refrigeration either alone will be four times this amount. This is one of the reasons that
economic impacts of the phase-out of refrigerant chemicals (such as CFCs in the past and
HCFCs in the foreseeable future) have been and still are difficult to estimate.
Refrigeration and air conditioning applications vary enormously in size and temperature
level. A domestic refrigerator has an electrical input between 60-140W and contains less
than 100-150 g of refrigerant, whereas industrial refrigeration and cold storage is
characterized by temperatures between -10 0 C and -40 C, with electrical inputs up to
several MW and refrigerant contents of many hundred kilograms. Air conditioning and
heat pumps may show evaporation temperatures between 0 C and 10 C, significantly
different from refrigeration applications and vary enormously in size and input.
It is clear that, to date, any technology using CFCs is globally out of date; however,
investment in HCFC technology is still subject to strategic considerations on the
availability of HCFCs, on the availability of replacement chemicals, on considerations on
greenhouse gas emissions from replacements, and above all, on economic aspects of
investments in certain equipment and on aspects of equipment operation. It is obvious;
however, that one will observe differences between developed and developing countries.
It is therefore may be not surprising to note that in the USA, the majority of the CFC
chillers has not been retrofitted and is still in operation, using recycled or may be
stockpiled CFC material. The process of selecting a refrigerant for the vapour
compression cycle is rather complex, since a large number of parameters need to be
investigated concerning their suitability for certain designs, including:
Temperature ranges,
Compressor requirements,
medium and low temperature refrigeration. Hydrocarbons are however, found extremely
inflammable
di-chloromethane
(CH2Cl2),
dichloroethylene
(C2H2C12)
and
Fig. 5 Breakdown of blowing agent use by type and country type [18]
At the point of discovery of the ozone hole in the early 1980s, virtually all of the
applications and product types listed above used CFCs as either a primary blowing agent
(rigid foams) or auxiliary blowing agent ( flexible foams). The total consumption of
CFCs by the foam sector in 1986 was approximately 250 ktonnes (165 ktonnes rigid; 85
ktonnes flexible). Blowing-agent use overall grew by a further 30% over the next 15
years, despite improved blowing efficiencies and reduced losses. In the meantime,
however, a variety of alternative blowing-agents have been evaluated and adopted. These
include HCFCs (as transitional substances), hydrocarbons, HFCs, methylene chloride (for
flexible foams) and various forms of CO2.
friendly refrigerant blend R-410A. The most intriguing challenge the refrigeration, air
conditioning and heat pump industry now facing is to ensure an easy transition from the
ozone depleting working fluids such as R-11, R-12, R12B, R-113, and R-114 to
environmentally friendly working fluids.
1.5 Global Warming Facts, Causes & Effect on Environment Due To Refrigerant
Global Warming is the increase of Earth's average surface temperature due to effect of
greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels or from
deforestation, which trap heat that would otherwise escape from Earth. This is a type of
greenhouse effect.
The most significant greenhouse gas is actually water vapor, not something produced
directly by humankind in significant amounts. However. Even slight increases in
atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide (C02) can cause a substantial increase in
temperature.
Ammonia was the first refrigerant to be used on a large scale. It is efficient, but it is also
very toxic and flammable. That is why safer substitutes have often been preferred and
ammonia is now generally restricted to use with supervision by skilled personnel (for
example, cold stores, dairies. and breweries). However the systems to ensure safety
involve a 30% to 40% cost premium compared to using less dangerous fluids.
HCFCs were developed in parallel with CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) and, together, they
provided the spectacular social development of safe, cheap and effective refrigeration.
HCFCs have a small effect on the ozone layer. They were labelled transitional
substances in 1990 and their production and use will be phased out. In 1990 their
contribution to greenhouse gas emissions was only 0. 5% of the total that year.
HFCs arc practically non-toxic and nonflammable, They can be used in a large number of
applications and equipment can he serviced and maintained by the large existing trained
base of installers. HFC present minimum risk, even in the case of an accidental leak.
They also offer very good energy performance. However, whilst they have no effect on
stratospheric or tropospheric ozone. They are greenhouse gases.
Hydrocarbons (LPG) are also efficient refrigeration fluids. However they are very
flammable, potentially explosive. And thus dangerous. In some countries, their use is
restricted or banned in public places and tall buildings. Hydrocarbons also contribute to
urban pollution as they trigger the generation of tropospheric ozone in the lower
atmosphere. Their global warming potential is low but safety requirements can increase
energy consumption and C02 emissions.
1. 6 Montreal Protocol & Kyoto Protocol
The Montreal Protocol, which was originally established in 1987, was created as a result
of the finding of the ozone hole over Antarctica by Rowland and Molina. They
discovered that chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were the culprit of the ozone depletion. The
Montreal Protocol was to end the production of substances that deplete ozone, which
included the phasing out of CFCs. In 1990 almost all developed and developing countries
came together to join the global treaty of the Montreal Protocol, known formally as the
London Amendment to the Montreal Protocol.
This treaty has been very effective especially due to the fact that it has instated a
ten year phase out of CFCs by developing countries, made possible through the
Multilateral Fund by the developed countries with insufficient funds for transitions. The
Montreal Protocol is also trying to phase out and curb more chemicals that are depleting
the ozone layer of our atmosphere. Due to all of these enforcements of the Montreal
Protocol, and the fact that it was agreed to by so many countries around the world, by
2009 CFC emissions were almost zero. CFCs and HFCs, though they deplete the ozone,
are also heat trapping pollutants. The phasing out of these chemicals has led to a greater
slowing of climate change.
On the other hand we have the Kyoto Protocol. While the Montreal Protocol was
established to phase out substances that deplete ozone, the Kyoto Protocol was set in
place to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases, with the exception to ozone depleting
substances. The Kyoto Protocol. Established later than the Montreal Protocols for the
global reduction of carbon dioxide (C02) emissions, which has been heightened greatly
by car exhaust throughout the years. The reduction of C02 has been significantly smaller
per year in comparison to how quickly CFCs were phased out. There have been more
controversies between countries, developed and developing, that has slowed the reduction
of greenhouse gases.
2. LITRATURE REVIEW
Dalkilic and Wongwises [1] studied an ideal vapour compression refrigeration system
was used for the performance analysis of alternative new refrigerant mixtures as
substitutes for CFC12, HFC134a, and CFC22. Considering the comparison of
performance coefficients (COP) and pressure ratios of the tested refrigerants and also the
main environmental impacts of ozone layer depletion and global warming, refrigerant
blends of HC290/HC600a (40/60 by wt.%) and HC290/HC1270 (20/80 by wt.%) were
found to be the most suitable alternatives among refrigerants tested for R12 and R22
respectively. The refrigeration efficiency, the performance coefficient (COP) of the
system, increases with increasing evaporating temperature for a constant condensing
temperature in the analysis. Better performance coefficient values (COP) than those of
the nonsuperheating /subcooling case were obtained as a result of this optimization.
P.Thangavel, at al [2] analysed the Compression Refrigeration Cycle with Different
Refrigerants. In this analysis, the performance of compression cycle is assessed
theoretically with
different
refrigerants. In
compression
refrigeration
system,
refrigerants investigated in the analysis RE-170,R-152a and R-600a have a slightly higher
COP than R-134a for the Condensation temperature 50o C and Evaporating temperature
ranging between -30oC to 10oC. They also found that all of the investigated refrigerants
have much higher Refrigerating effect and isentropic compression work than R-134a.
M. Mohanraj, S. Jayraj, C. Muraleedharan, P. Chandrasekar [4] did experimental
investigation of R-290/R-600a mixture as an alternative to R-134a in domestic
refrigerator of 200 L capacity. They were used mixture R-290 /R-600a in weight
proportion of 45.2% /54.8%.They performed Continuous running test under different
ambient temperatures of 240C, 280C, 320C,380C and 430C.Their overall performance
has proved that the above hydrocarbon refrigerant mixture could be the best long term
alternative to phase out R-134a.
Azzouz K et al [5]. carried out experimental investigation to investigate the performance
of a household refrigerator using a phase change material (PCM). The PCM is located on
the back side of the evaporator in order to improve its efficiency and to provide a storage
capacity allowing several hours of refrigeration without power supply. The system has
been tested with water and with a eutectic mixture (freezing point 3 C) and for a range
of operating conditions (PCM thickness, ambient temperature, thermal load). The
analysis or the results shows a significant improvement of the performance compared to a
conventional system with a 10 to 30% increase in COP depending On thermal load and
type or PCM used.
D. Ledueq et al [6]. published a research document which provides an overview of the
efforts of the FRISBEE project in Europe which aims to use thermal energy storage in the
form of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) to bring about innovation and improvement in
the cold chain industry. An advanced controller taking into account the quality, energy
use and environmental impacts is developed. Based on the generic principle of predictive
controller, this controller determines an optimal control strategy on a daily period taking
advantage of the thermal energy storage capacity. The researchers build upon the results
of Azzouz et al. and conclude that by using a predictive control approach and phase
change material in refrigeration systems, previous experiments show significant
performance of the refrigerator with a horizontal PCM. The experimental results obtained
for a prototype refrigerator will be presented and discussed.
4. METHODOLOGY
4.1 Experimental Setup
Experimental setup to carry out investigation on refrigerator performance will be as
follows,
Period of Work
Proposed Work
15 July 15 Aug
16 Aug 15 Oct
16 Oct 15 Nov
20Dec 15 Jan
16 Jan 15 Feb
16 Feb 15 April
16 April
May
15
6. GANTT CHART
REFERENCES
1] A.S. Dalkilic, S. Wongwises ,A performance comparison of vapour-compression
refrigeration system using various alternative refrigerants International Communications
in Heat and Mass Transfer 37 (2010) pp. 13401349
2] P.Thangavel, Dr.P.Somasundaram, T.Sivakumar, C.Selva Kumar, G.Vetriselvan,
Simulation Analysis of Compression Refrigeration Cycle with Different Refrigerants,
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2 Issue
10, April 2013, pp. 127-131.
pp 212.
Engineering,
Available:
http://www.et.web.mek.dtu.dk/Coolpack/UK/download.html .
[11] Danfoss (2009). RS+3 Compressor and Condensing unit selection tool, Available:
http://www.danfoss.com/BusinessAreas/RefrigerationAndAirConditioning/Product+Selec
tion+Tools+Details/RSplus3.htm.
[12] B.O. Bolaji, Experimental study of R152a and R32 to replace R134a in a domestic
refrigerator, Energy 35 (2010) pp. 3793-3798
[13] M. Mohanraj & S. Jayaraj & C. Muraleedharan, Comparative assessment of
environment-friendly alternatives to R134a in domestic refrigerators, Energy Efficiency
(2008) pp.189198.
[14] M.A. Hammad, M.A. Alsaad, The use of hydrocarbon mixtures as refrigerants in
domestic refrigerators, Applied Thermal Engineering (1999) pp. 1181-1189
[14] B.O. Bolaji , M.A. Akintunde , and T.O. Falade, Comparative Analysis of
Performance of Three Ozone-Friends HFC Refrigerants in a Vapour Compression
Refrigerator, Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment 2 (2011) pp. 61-64
[15] Thangavel P, Somasundaram P. Part load performance of analysis of vapour
compression refrigeration system with hydrocarbons refrigerants. J Sci Ind Res 2013;
72: pp.454-60.
[16] Y.S. Chang, M.S. Kim, S.T. Ro, Performance and heat transfer characteristics of
hydrocarbon refrigerants in a heat pump system. International Journal of Refrigeration
23 (2000) pp. 232-242.