NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

Making a complaint against the

police, a Police and Crime
Commissioner or the Mayors
Office for Policing and Crime
IPCC Office Use Only

Completing the form

Please use BLOCK CAPITALS when completing this form. If you have any difficulties in filling
out this form, and would like to discuss it please call 101. If you would like someone to act on
your behalf (perhaps a friend or relative) please provide their details and your written
permission for them to act on your behalf and submit this with your form.

Your details (complainant)

Title: e.g. Mr, Miss, Mrs, Ms
Surname:

(Mr)

Claus

Address:

First name:

Santa

Date of birth:

45/13/3001

273 C St. Nicholas Drive

90 degrees North latitude
North Pole

Work telephone

Postcode: AK 99705

N/A

Mobile telephone number:

Home telephone number

N/A

N/A

Email: electaddofsantac@aol.com

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

Who are you complaining about?

Please give the details of who you are complaining about for example the police force /
Police and Crime Commissioner or the Mayors Office for Policing and Crime.
Police force
For complaints against the police please give us any details you might have about the
officer(s) you would like to make a complaint against:
Name, rank, ID and any other identifier: Police Constable Thomas Blake 1131
Name, rank, ID and any other identifier:
If you know the police station that the officer/s work from, please give details:
Grimsby police station (Assume)

What is your complaint about?

Please describe the circumstances that have led to your complaint? Include details of:

Who was involved?

What was said and done
Where the incident took place
When the incident took place
If there was any damage or injury
Any other people who witnessed the incident
Details of any witness

At this stage we only require a summary of your complaint, but you may attach additional
information if necessary. Please use the space provided on the last page of this form.

On 27.8.15 (afternoon) on public grounds in front of Humberside Police station Grimsby a

witness (whom I accuse of perjury) mistook my observing a tree in the vicinity, to be that of
taking a piss against its trunk. Shortly after, PC Blake turned up and walked over to the trees
location, accompanied by the witness who had initially sounded the alerted.
Both appeared to be examining the tree and area for signs of evidence to prove that the false
allegations were true. It was obvious to the officer that I had not been urinating as falsely
accused, but used the fact that there was no evidence that I had been urinating to change the
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

accusation from one of urinating in a public place to indecent exposure, presumably because
of the lesser burden of proof required for a conviction.
The witness who went on to make a complaint had said to me he would not be doing so
before accompanying the officer to the spot where I had been accused of urinating. He stated
at the time (when I believe PC Blake was present) that he had seen me zipping/unzipping my
fly. However, I was wearing denim jeans which had no zip the fly operated with buttons,
therefore, if I had been taking a piss or indecently exposing myself, he would not have
witnessed the zipping or unzipping of my fly.
Note: By 1 September 2015 when the second witness produced her statement, the reference
to my fly had been changed from zip to buttons.
When this was highlighted to PC Blake he appeared not to consider it relevant and focussed
on bringing a charge for public indecency regardless of there being no evidence. The sudden
decision change by the witness from stating that a complaint would not be made to actually
pursuing a complaint leads me to suspect that PC Blake had incited him to commit perjury as
he has produced a witness statement which he knows to be false.
Ongoing dispute with Humberside police
I have been embroiled in a dispute that has been ongoing for a number of years with
Humberside police relating to matters for which the force is complicit in substantial fraud (on a
national scale) committed by private bailiffs working on behalf of local authorities which those
councils also endorse. My concerns are that because of my allegations of complicity that the
force may be motivated to fabricate evidence, as has happened in this case, for the purpose
of pay-back.
The arresting officer had no good cause to suspect that the charges brought were warranted
and the subsequent arrest and imprisonment was unlawful for which Humberside Police
should be held accountable.
My complaint specifically relates to
i) Suspicion that PC Blake incited a witness to commit perjury.
ii) Wrongful arrest by PC Blake, leading to false imprisonment.
The key witnesses of whom there are four Im aware of are:
1) A J
2) T J
3) Steven Warriner
4) Thomas Blake
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

Im in possession of the papers relating to the prosecution and all of the above have
submitted witness statements. As a consequence I wish to formally report crimes in the
matter of perjury with regards to the witness statements produced by A and T J as they
contain evidence that both witnesses intend to pervert the course of justice by means of false
and corrupt statements. Both state without reservation that they had seen my willy on the
afternoon of 27 August 2015. That, I know to be a fabrication because at no point in time did
any act take place which would have required the exposure of my penis.
With regard to PC Blakes witness statement, it was inaccurate particularly where the text had
been emphasised with capital letters. One such obviously contrivance was evident by the way
he reported something he had alleged Id said:
I asked him what he was doing and he replied I WASNT HAVING A PISS, I WASNT
DOING ANYTHING, I HAVE A KEEN INTEREST and then stopped himself.
Of course, it doesnt take much intelligence to conclude that his creative input to omit what
was actually said, i.e., I have a keen interest in trees was to allow an opening for the police
to imply that the keen interest might be something for which it could secure a trumped-up
charge which became evident in the interrogation conducted at 23:17 on 27 August 2015.

Signature and date

The details of this complaint will be sent to the appropriate authority responsible for
considering your complaint. Please sign and date to confirm the information you have
provided is correct:

Signature

Date 8 November 2015

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

Ethnic group
So that we can ensure that we are providing all sections of society with the best possible
service, we would ask you to give us a few details about your ethnicity. Any information given
in this section will be treated in the strictest confidence and will in no way have any effect on
the way your comment is treated.
WHITE
British
Irish
Any other White background

MIXED
White and Black Caribbean
White and Black African
White and Asian
Any other mixed background

ASIAN OR ASIAN BRITISH

Indian
Pakistani
Bangladeshi
Any other Asian background

BLACK OR BLACK BRITISH

Caribbean
African
Any other Black background

CHINESE OR OTHER ETHNIC GROUP

Chinese
Any other ethnic group

NOT STATED

Where to send this form

For your complaint to be dealt with more quickly please send this form directly to:
Professional Standards Branch
Humberside Police
Police Headquarters
Priory Road
Hull HU5 5SF
Or via email to: ProfessionalStandards@humberside.pnn.police.uk

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

Additional notes
Concerns I wish to raise surrounding arrest and imprisonment
After around 10 minutes into being handcuffed I requested they be loosened as they were
unnecessarily tight and causing pain. After a quick check the officer responded by stating that
there was plenty of room and suggested I try moving my elbows closer together (my hands
were behind my back) in an attempt to lessen the pressure.
I was falsely imprisoned for around 8 hours. After a while in the cell I still sensed soreness
from the handcuffs and noticed the marks remained visible, so called for someone to have
them photographed. A woman spoke through the cells spy hole and stated that someone
would come and deal with the matter. However, nobody ever did come and the marks which
in fact remained visible for some days afterwards were never photographed.

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED