Sei sulla pagina 1di 47

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ILONA ELY GRENADIER HECKMAN
DAVID M. GRENADIER
PLAINTIFFS

Case No.

V.

CASE NO City of Alexandria VA: CL 15 - 003661

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER


WELLS FARGO BANK
GJJV PARTNERSHIP
JAMES WARBASSE
PADRIC KELLY OBRIEN
ARMY NAVY COUNTRY CLUB
DEFENDANTS
COUNTER CLAIM / CROSS COMPLAINT
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
DEFENDANT
V.
ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER HECKMAN ( Ilona)
GREANDIER ANDERSON STARACE DUFFETT & KIESER (Grenadier Law et al)
DAVID MARK GRENADIER (David)
MICHEAL WIESER ESQ (M. WIESER)
DIMUROGINSBERG
BEN DIMURO (BEN)
ANDERA MOSLEY
STATE OF VIRGINIA
BWW LAW GROUP (BWW LAW)
TROUTMAN SANDERS AKA MAYS AND VALENTINE
WELLS FARGO BANK
Plaintiffs AS PUBLIC SERVANTS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL
CAPACITY AS AN OFFICER OF THE COURT WHERE APPLICABLE
ANSWER BY DEFENDANT JANICE WOLK GRENADIER TO COMPLAINT FOR JUDGEMENT
CREDITORS SALE OF REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 15 WEST SPRING STREET,
ALEXANDIRA, VIRGINIA
COUNTER CLAIM AND CROSS COMPLAINT AGAINST PLAINTIFFS LISTED ABOVE
DEMAND FOR A TRIAL BY JURY
CAMERAS TO BE ALLOWED IN THE COURT ROOM
COMES NOW Defendant JANICE WOLK GRENADIER - PRO SE residing at and sole owner in the
home at 15 West Spring Street, Alexandria, VA 22301 reserves the right to amend COUNTER CLAIM AND
CROSS COMPLAINT AGAINST PLAINTIFFS, as well as add additional Parties per FRCP Rule 15 and
1

Virginia Rule as That Defendant Janice Denies all allocations and disingenuous statements made by Plaintiffs
and complains against the captioned Plaintiffs under Counter Claim and Cross Complaint as follows: to seek
relief for the violation of Federal and Constitutional rights under Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983, Title 18
U.S. Code 241 & 242 and under the Bill of Rights the Four Basic Freedoms are being Violated:
1. Freedom of Speech
3. Freedom of Want
2. Freedom of Worship
4. Freedom of Fear
5. In 1967, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas posed the following inquiry: What
about the judge who conspires with local law enforcement officers to railroad a dissenter? What about
the judge who knowingly turns a trial into a kangaroo court? Or one who knowingly flouts the
Constitution in order to obtain a conviction? [Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 566-67 (1967)].
Those very issues raised by Justice Douglas over 40 years ago are now surfacing by way of this lawsuit,
exposing the two original Plaintiffs and others such actors while serving as an example to others who
might be intentionally abusing the protected rights of self-represented litigants.
6.
7. That Janice will show Lawyers and Judges colluded illegally to prevent the TRUTH being exposed of the
actions of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman and all the time bullying, and denying due
process to ProSe Litigant Janice Wolk Grenadier. That Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier, Erika Ely
Grenadier Lewis and David Mark Grenadier has stolen from Janice Wolk Grenadier roughly $20,000,000.
(Twenty Million Dollars) without damages, that this court has denied Janice Wolk Grenadier Due Process going to
the extreme to silence her by illegally jailing her for two purposes:
1. Prevent the TRUTH and all the criminal acts and actions of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier
Heckman and others in the Old Boys Network of Virginia and Washington DC being exposed.
2. That Senator Mark Warner may not had been re-elected if e-mails between his office and Janice in regard to the
corruption of the Judiciary after his exposure of PAY TO PLAY by the Washington Post with other Virginia
Officials to trade a Federal Judgeship to a Virginia Legislatures daughter. That Janice went to him desperate for
help to only find herself Jailed and his mocking her at a BiPartison Event on October 6, 2015 with the comment
Having just been re-elected, knowing Janice was just a few feet away from him and she had been jailed to
prevent those e-mails from being released, shows the arrogance.

8.
9. That the appearance is the hope was while Janice was in jail and with the warfare like torture she would come out
and commit suicide. That the evidence will show that on September 2007, the slippery slope of the corruption to
prevent the TRUTH began with Lawyer Ilona lying in court to Judge Kloch. That what would follow would be
Judge Donald Haddock bringing in his friends / Judges (Judge Hoss refused, Judge Fortkort, Judge J.Howe Brown,
Judge James McGrath, Judge Nolan Dawkins, Judge James Clark, Judge OBrien (PWC) and Judge Weimer of Prince
William County) all ignoring Va Rule 17.105 (b) with the support and help of the entire Virginia Judiciary Appeals
Court, Supreme Court, Virginia State Bar and the JIRC) to rule in favor of Lawyer Ilona for his (Judge Donald
Haddock) personal and others personal LOVE he claimed to have. The documents if allowed a fair trial with a
jury will show that the TRUTH is the COVER UP includes the appearance of attempted MURDER FOR HIRE by
Divorce Lawyer Ilona and David.
10.

11. That Lawyer Ilona is guilty of: Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud
on the Court, Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office
for great personal gain over $20 Million in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, joint and several liability,
malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Gang like activity mirror image to the Klu

Klux Klan, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest related to the practice of law, violating
code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, Social, United state
Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Violating RULES OF
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US Code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under
color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et
seq., was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC 912. With her Intention to 18 USC
1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on the
Court, 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, 18.2-172 - Judicial Misconduct; Criminal Misconduct; Mail
Fraud; Honest Serves Fraud; Extortion; Harassment; Gang activity; Racketeering; Retaliation; Discrimination; et al.
not limited to: decisions made in bad faith for a corrupt purpose, deliberately and intentionally failing to follow the law;
Extrinsic fraud; Egregious legal errors; Violation of Procedural Rules; Violation of Due Process; uttering, etc., other
writings et al. All of above charges will and can be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who

have also been harmed by the actions of Lawyer Ilona. Many of the above charges are criminal and
have jail sentences.
12.
13. That Janice will show the Plaintiffs Ilona and David have since December of 1986 stolen everything she has with
the support of a Judiciary that will go to extreme lengths to protect one of their own no matter how corrupt that
lawyer is and reminds this court :"Pro se Janice is poor unable to hire an attorney and is unfamiliar with the
formalities of pleading requirements. Recognizing this, the Supreme Court has instructed the district courts to
construe pro se complaints liberally and to apply a more flexible standard in determining the sufficiency of a pro
se complaint than they would in reviewing a pleading submitted by counsel. See e.g., Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S.
5, 9-10, 101 S.Ct. 173, 175-76, 66 L.Ed.2d 163 (1980) (per curiam); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92
S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972) (per curiam); see also Elliott v. Bronson, 872 F.2d 20, 21 (2d Cir.1989)
(per curiam). In order to justify the dismissal of a pro se complaint, it must be " 'beyond doubt that the plaintiff
can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.' " Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S.
at 521, 92 S.Ct. at 594 (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)).
14. Further Janice reminds this court she does not have the financial means of Ilona and David that she has
everything stolen from her by them and that she has no intention of backing down and allowing these criminal
acts of now trying to steal her home to protect not only Lawyer Ilonas criminal acts but the criminal acts of the
attorneys that have supported Lawyer Ilonas criminal acts.
15.
16. That all of this could have been prevented if the FBI, the City of Alexandria Police, the Judiicay, the
Government and Elected Officials had done there job. If the Judges had ruled by law and not Friendships,
using Orders to slander Janice, disallow her any defense only to protect one of there own.
17.
18. Further Claims are outlined in this answer and Counter Complaint.
19. DEMAND FOR A TRIAL BY JURY, CAMERA IN THE COURT ROOM
20.

21.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

1. Janice incorporates by reference the allegations of paragraphs above


2. This court has original jurisdiction of federal questions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 1332. The court has
supplemental jurisdiction of state claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367. Venue is proper in this court pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2). That Plaintiffs Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman resides in the District of Columbia
and has since on or around 1990 or earlier, that David Mark Grenadier resides in Silver Spring, Maryland
since on or around 2006. That Wells Fargo Corporation is licensed to do Business in the District of Columbia
and have active Bank Branches and ATMs in the District of Columbia. BWW Law Group transacts business
in Maryland, Virginia, District of Columbia and surrounding states making this a multi-jurisdictional matter
which this court has jurisdiction and authority. Defendants have intentionally interfered with Plaintiffs rights

under the Interstate Commerce Act which rights are protected under Title 15 U.S.C. This court has
jurisdiction under FRCP Rule 1, 2, & 3 and 28 U.S.C. 45.

22.
3. Further this court has Jurisdiction per: 28 U.S.C. 1343(a)(3) (1993) provides as follows:
23. (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by
any person: . . . (3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any
Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States.
24. 28 U.S.C. 1331 (1993) provides that district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising
under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States
25.
26. a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by
any person: (1) To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any
right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracy mentioned in
section 1985 of Title 42; (2) To recover damages from any person who fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any
wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent;
27. (3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of
any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress
providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States; (4) To recover
damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress providing for the protection of civil
rights, including the right to vote.
28. Any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the
District of Columbia.

29.
4. That the District of Columbia is the right Venue for HATE CRIMES that this is a hate crime with Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman using her money and Perceived POWER to pull in any and all favors
from the Judiciary, the Government and Elected officials in a Mafia / Racketeering type fashion for her hate
of Janice for many reasons but, the predominant one being Catholic.

30.

31.

PARTIES

32. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of paragraphs through 4 above


5. ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER HECKMAN ( Ilona) Divorce Lawyer that has lied in court,
lied in all court documents summited in all cases. Lawyer Ilona is guilty of: Perjury, Obstruction of Justice,
Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from
the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million in Real
Estate now worth much more, Theft of Herman Grenadier, joint and several liability, malpractice, Bribery,
Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Gang like activity mirror image to the Klue Klux Klan,
Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest related to the practice of law, violating
code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, Social, United state
Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Violating RULES OF
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US Code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights
under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42
U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC 912. With her
Intention to 18 USC 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious
behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations prohibited, 18.2-172 - Judicial
Misconduct; Criminal Misconduct; Mail Fraud; Honest Serves Fraud; Extortion; Harassment; Gang activity;
Racketeering; Retaliation; Discrimination; et al. not limited to: decisions made in bad faith for a corrupt
purpose, deliberately and intentionally failing to follow the law; Extrinsic fraud; Egregious legal errors;
Violation of Procedural Rules; Violation of Due Process; uttering, etc., other writings et al . All of above

charges will and can be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the
actions of Plaintiff. That many of her criminal actions have jail time associated with them.

33.
5

34. That Ilona Grenadier Heckman orchestrated and executed since February 14, 1986 the knowledgeable
manipulation of Janice and others. That the corruption in the Judicial System is deliberate and with knowledge
intend, in planning to harm Janice.
35.
36. February 14, 1986 Started the lies, the manipulation the following article shows she knows what she is doing:
37.
November 30, 2007 Lawyer Ilona Described as the Big Guns Washingtons top 800 Lawyers article
38.
Letter dated February 8, 2008 from Ilona to Janice riddled with lies 3rd page goes into David sleeping
with his sister, and which shows her collusion in the Gun being pulled by David on Janice While her girls were
in the home November of 1998
39.
September 18, 2008 Tax record to prove Grenadier still owned Southway Terrace 2 nd page of letter
February 8, 2008 Ilona implies Southway has been sold. Lie which it was also lied about in court by David
and ignored by Judge McGrath as every lie has been by David and Ilona
40.
February 27, 2008 Ilonas Counter Claim and Cross-Complaint full of lies filed in the court as a
Lawyer
41.
May 21, 2008 Letter from Ilona to Janice denying her lies, and further lies on Bellefonte file
42.
E-mails from July 24 July 26, 2008 riddled with Ilona lies.
43.
February 2009 Washingtonian top 25 Divorce attorneys includes Ilona and is referred to as A tough
cookie for cases that might not be amicable, she can mix it up in a state where the old-boy network is strong
Again referencing her connection to the Old Boy Network of VA and DC.
44.
March 2009 Alexandria Bar Thanks Ilona law firm for their generosity in table sponsors after VSB
complaint is denied
45.
November 2011 OYEZ Alexandria Bar Thank-you to Portrait fund for Judge Haddock includes Ilona
and her attorney Ben DiMuros law firm * In October of 2011 Judge Haddock blocked Plaintiff from going in
front of grand jury against him and Ilona.
46.
November 2011 OYEZ Thank you for a party that looks like a cost of over $100,000. For most of
above the Defendants
47.
48.
May 13, 2012 Letter from Janice to Ilona severing her client relationship has worked as Defendants
lawyer since March of 1990 forward demanding her to not higher another attorney Which Defendant did not
do, until later and hid Ilonas secrets of stealing over $95,000 from the Sonia Grenadier Trust
49.
Manta - showing David Grenadier working out of Grenadier et al law firm, using same number for
Mt. Vernon Bookkeeping Services
50.
51. Owed to Janice by Ilona Grenadier Heckman / GIC et al BY RIGHT and BY Law: all numbers estimated
and approximate as the co-mingling of funds for other Real Estate through other Trusts et al will only up the
numbers.
52.
53. Note Sonia Grenadier Trust $ 30,000.00 /10% Interest

$ 307,576.00

i. Prevented Lawyer Ilona from losing her Law License and going to
ii. Jail as Jim Arthur did.
54. Clients which Defendant loss due to the Note(10% int)
$3,471,940.78
55. Lawyer Ilona demanded acting as Janice lawyer that she had to give up her client the very min cost to that was the listings
for the new homes
56.
57. Real Estate
a. Bellefonte Ave Personal ownership 50% (10% int)
$ 504,003.25
58. GIC Properties at least 24.5%
$10,000.000.00
b. (accounting of sales, rents, depreciation etc needed)
59. Southway / SouthHampton Terrace at least 24.5 %
60.
$4,000,000.00

61.
63.
64.
65.

c. ( an accounting for rents, depreciation, income etc needed)


d. The apartments appear to have Rental income of approx.
$87.000.00 monthly
Monroe Ave at least 24.5% right tax losses et al
$ 1,500,000.00
e. (accounting for rents income needed , etc)
62.
Bankruptcy That Janice would not have been in so is owed legal fees and expenses
Legal Fees
$ 319,613.81
Expenses / Damages
$ TBD

66.
67. Damages for actions that were and still are willful acts that are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton
and grossly reckless in collusion with others. Damages that go back to the first known Lie / Fraud to Defendant
February 14, 1986 and is continuing criminal act with this law suit.
68.
69. By all appearance Ilona Grenadier is bringing in around by apperance $150,000, a month in rent from
properties most likely more. Majority of this rental income is from properties acquired by stealing money from
the Sonia Grenadier Trust and Janice Wolk Grenadier. That Defendant by right owns at least 24.5% of all
properties BY RIGHT & VIRGINIA LAW. That Defendant is not sure and with discovery how much of
her money has been co-mingled in other partnerships and business ventures with Erika Lewis.
70.
71. That on September 4, 2013 Ilona Grenadier Heckman intervened into the re-opening of Janices divorce.
That Janice at that point started looking closely at the facts and everyone that was involved with the Divorce,
GIC, Bellefonte, Bankruptcy Court. The truth that Janice was unaware of came out.
72.
73. Ilona Grenadier Heckman from February 14, 1986 had manipulated, lied to, and stolen from the Sonia Grenadier
Trust and Janice Wolk Grenadier to create a Real Estate Empire. That Ilona Grenadier Heckman is a Gang
Leader of Racketeering, Discrimination and Corruption in the Virginia Judicial System.

74.
6. GREANDIER ANDERSON STARACE DUFFETT & KIESER (Grenadier Law et al)- That the Law firm
and its Lawyers have represented Ilona and are aware of her criminal activities and all lawyers in the firm
have broken the law of the Professional Code of Ethics in a self policing profession. That lawyer Heather
Jenquine - Grenadier Law et al - is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,

Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klu
Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to
prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the
Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court,
TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws
75.
76. Represented Ilona Grenadier Heckman in documents and court.Lawyer at Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffitt
and Keisler. Aware of Criminal actions of all and have ignored them
77. President of the Alexandria Bar Chapter
78.
79. February 13, 2008 Orders by Judge Brown represented by Heather Jenquine counsel for Ilona Grenadier.
August 27, 2008 Defendant Ilona Grenadiers Exhibit and Witness List filed by Heather Jenquine counsel for
Ilona.
May 2012 Last Presidents Letter for OYEZ President of Alexandria Bar
80.
7. DAVID MARK GRENADIER (David) The ex-husband and in collusion with Ilona, Erika to steal from
February 14, 1983 anything and everything he could with doing as much physical, mental harm as he could.
By all appearance involved in hiring a hit man and others to harm Janice, et al Ilonas right hand man for
corruption.

81.
8. ERIKA ELY GRENADIER LEWIS (Erika) Daughter to Ilona, on signed an agreement taking 1%
ownership of GIC a partnership that Janice had rightful ownership in as wife of David Grenadier and comingling of funds. Lawyer Ilona, David and Erika used a lawyer that was not licensed in Virginia to collude
and steal from Janice.

82.
9. TIMBERLAKE LEWIS (Timberlake) Husband of Erika Ely Grenadier Lewis - That the appearance is
Real Estate Partnerships between Timberlake, Erika and Ilona in California could have come from profits of
GIC which Janices rightful ownership was stolen by Erika, Ilona and David with a lawyer not licensed in
Virginia, from a Virginia Partnerships called GIC.

83.
84.
10. MICHEAL WIESER ESQ (M. WIESER) David Grenadiers attorney who promoted and lied in court,
court documents to harm Janice, and have Janice Illegally Jailed by his bestie Judge James Clark, whom he
helped to get elected to become a Circuit Court Judge. That on November 12, 2015 was Janice was released
early from Jail as it was illegal to jail her Judge Clark commented to him:
85.
86. I am so sorry I was unable to collect your legal fees, You will have to come back for a Judgment
he never has and Ilona is going after a sale of the home on Illegal Orders with no standing and no judgments.
Is guilty of Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch,
Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klu Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape,
Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of
the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18
U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Bribery, perjury, Fraud on the Court, conspiracy/collusion to
obstruct due process, Miscarriage of Justice, Appearance of Justice, conflict of interest, conflict of interest recusal,
Breach of Fiduciary duties, ignoring his Oath of Office, Conspiracy against rights, and other violations of the VSB
duties of an officer of the court. and other laws

87.
88. Lied in Court documents to the Bankruptcy Court, Lied in Court documents to the Supreme Court of
Virginia, In affidavit showed more phone calls to Judges Chambers then to his own client, Other situations
show he was in collusion with the Judges to prevent Due Process
89.
90. July 26, 2010 Michael Weiser filed with the COA Circuit Court an Opposition to Motion at 4.54 seconds before
5pm with never reaching out to JWG that there was an issue with the date or could be an issue with the date of
July 28, 2011 for Motion to be heard.
91. July 30, 2010 Ilona Grenadier files her opposition 92. Question: Michael Weiser, Ilona Grenadier and the Judges were in collusion to once again prevent due process, in
a reasonable time. Justice delayed is Justice denied.

93. February 3, 2011 Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal with Supreme Court of Virginia
Mr. Weiser is Disingenuous with the Supreme Court when he states:
94.

95.
96.
September 26, 2014 Affidavit of legal fees more calls to Judges chambers then to his client,
is in collusion with Ben DiMuro / DiMuroGinsberg

97.
11. DIMUROGINSBERG Several of there lawyers Judge James Tran, Hillary Collyer, Ben DiMuro and
Andrea Mosley worked illegally in collusion with Ilona, David, M. Wieser to harm Janice. The collusion
included Obstruction of Justice, Lying in court, in court documents, in court documents to the Supreme Court
of Virginia. Hillary J. Collyer - DiMuro Ginsberg / Lasher et al is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal
Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the
Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to
prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme
courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18
U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Bribery, perjury, Fraud on the Court,
conspiracy/collusion to obstruct due process, Miscarriage of Justice, Appearance of Justice, conflict of
interest, conflict of interest recusal, Breach of Fiduciary duties, ignoring his Oath of Office, Conspiracy
against rights, and other violations of the VSB duties of an officer of the court.and other laws

98.
99. John Tran, Hillary Collyer, and Andrea Mosley ccd each other regularly on documents submitted with the Court,
letters, e-mails sent to JWG. Making an action of one an action of all Four - DiMuroGinsberg Law firm. Hillary
Collyer has left DiMuroGinsberg so Lasher et al will be included in this suit.
100.
101.
Judge John Tran - DiMuro Ginsberg / Fairfax County Judgeis guilty of: Judicial Misconduct,
Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to
the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent
Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts,
Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241
& 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Bribery, perjury, Fraud on the Court, conspiracy/collusion to obstruct
due process, Miscarriage of Justice, Appearance of Justice, conflict of interest, conflict of interest recusal, Breach
of Fiduciary duties, ignoring his Oath of Office, Conspiracy against rights, and other violations of the VSB duties
of an officer of the court. and other laws
04/05/2013 - McLeans John Tran named first Asian-American
judge in Virginia history, to join Fairfax benchBy Tom JackmanU.S. District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee tried
cases against Tran in private practice in Alexandria, then supervised his cases as a judge. Its a great day for the
Commonwealth of Virginia, said Lee, who was a Fairfax circuit judge for six years before immigrating to the fed
bench in 1998. Johns an excellent lawyer whos given much of his time to our community, in the bar association
and in pro bono work. Today is a huge step forward for our judiciary and for fairness. John Tran was involved in
the collusion of Plaintiff and her girls to be harmed, lying in documents to the Supreme Court, ex-parte
communications et al, John Tran & Hillary Collyer, and Andrea Mosley ccd each other regularly on documents

submitted with the Court, letters, e-mails sent to JWG. Making an action of one an action of all Four DiMuroGinsberg Law firm.

102.
12. Andrea Mosley - DiMruoGinsbergis guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct,
Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klu Klux Klan,
Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process,
Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of
the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 &
242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Bribery, perjury, Fraud on the Court, conspiracy/collusion to obstruct
due process, Miscarriage of Justice, Appearance of Justice, conflict of interest, conflict of interest recusal,
Breach of Fiduciary duties, ignoring his Oath of Office, Conspiracy against rights, and other violations of the
VSB duties of an officer of the court.and other laws

103.
104.
Andrea Mosley lied in court misleading the court to have Janice illegally jailed for the legal fees that
Ilona not the attorneys that were awarded the fees are going after, Janices home. Andrea Mosley has no sign of
ethical behavior that for a pay check she will lie in court, in court documents et al
105.
13. BEN DIMURO (BEN) Principle of DimuroGinsberg had met with Janice and David on other occasions
and he represented them along with Ilona, Jerry Heckman Ilonas 3 rd husband, 1st cousin to her second
husband Judge Albert Grenadier, in the fire for 404 East Monroe Ave, Alexandria Va. Under the Professional
Code of Ethics and past President of the Virginia State Bar he should have known the law, even though it was
pointed out to him several occasions that he had a conflict he continued to act as above the law and lie in
documents, represent Lawyer Ilona etc. DiMuroGinsberg is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal
Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the
Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape, Slander of Plaintiff to
prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme
courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18
U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other lawsBribery, perjury, Fraud on the Court,
conspiracy/collusion to obstruct due process, Miscarriage of Justice, Appearance of Justice, conflict of
interest, conflict of interest recusal, Breach of Fiduciary duties, ignoring his Oath of Office, Conspiracy
against rights, and other violations of the VSB duties of an officer of the court.
106.
107.
Ben Past President of the Virginia State Bar, which he helps support through the interest of his Escrow
Account? Has designated 10% of his and his wife Sandys estate to the Virginia Law Foundation.Partner to
DiMuroGinsburg law firm, which also John Tran & Hillary Collyer, Andrea Mosley of DiMuroGinsburg for their
actions are Defendants in this suit.

108.
109.
April of 1989 twice met with Janice and her then husband David to discuss a fire that he was representing
GIC/Monroe Ave partnership for the overage on the insurance. David was 49% owner of GIC at the time.
110.
111. New Evidence shows on or around April 17, 2009 Wrote threatening letter that Janice was trying to Extort money from
Lawyer Ilona - Money that Ilona owed Janice from malicious manipulation, and stealing it from Janice. Through misc
attached letters supports the lies of Ilona Grenadier even after given the evidence. Janice was completely cleared of all
Extortion charges as it was clear she was telling the Truth and the money was owed her.
112.
113.April 2009 it is also known at this time Ben DiMuro was representing Howard Bierman of BWW Law group for criminal acts
that were brought against him by the Virginia State Bar. This is important because in the Statement of Facts the collusion of
Ben DiMuro, Howard Bierman and Ilona and the acts of the 3 of them to make me homeless began a long time ago.
114.
115.July 2009 to this date is involved with e-mails from the Grenadiers, Loretta Lax Miller aka Muggy Cat to myself in the
collusion of their racist bigot attitude to the fact I raised by girls Catholic. Calling the Pope a wanker. To harass and
intimidate Plaintiff and her girls

10

116.
117.October of 2009 with the collusion of Randy Sengel - Commonwealth Attorney of the City of Alexandria, using bullying and
scare tactics to get JWG charged with the Extortion game he had come up with in April of 2009 when hired by Ilona
Grenadier and her law firm, to use whatever illegal and unprofessional tactics it took to dispose of exposer to her criminal
activities. The Extortion issue with Randy Sengel bringing in the City of Alexandria Police Charles Pak to try and intimidate
JWG.
118.
119.Feb 2, 2011 Lied in Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal Dated Feb 2, 2011 in the Supreme Court of
Virginia on Page 2 Paragraph 2 - Here, Petitioner has failed to ensure that the record contains either transcripts or a written
statement of facts. This was a false statement to mislead the Supreme Court of Virginia.
120.
121.August of 2011 involved in ex-parte communications for the delay of the Motion for Reconsideration to be heard in August
of 2011.
122.
123.October of 2011 publically thanked for the generous donation to Judge Haddocks Portrait Fund Thank you for helping me
with my client Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman which continued in October of 2011 when Judge Haddock denied
Janice in front of a Grand Jury. Judge Haddock to date has had his hand prints all over this for the LOVE he has for
Lawyer Ilona.
124.
125. Ben DiMuro and his law firm has worked in collusion with the actions of the City of Alexandria, Judges, Commonwealth
Attorney, Clerk of Court, VSB, JIRC, Courts of Justice, the Democratic party, Virginia Legislators, Supreme Court of
Virginia has acted intentionally, willfully, wantonly, and maliciously in their collusion to protect Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckman founding partner to the law firm Grenadier, Anderson, Stracae, Duffett&Kiesler, the late wife of Judge
Albert Grenadier, from being held responsible for her and her law firms criminal activity. Ben DiMuros blatant abusive
actions in regard to the United States of America Constitution, Virginia Constitution, Civil Rights, religious rights of a
citizen.
126.
127.Ben DiMuro and his firm have worked in collusion to Intimidate, Maliciously Manipulate Janice Wolk Grenadier using
Scare Tactics, the Alexandria Police, and the Courts of Virginia, motivated by financial interests and cronyism. Causing
Janice Wolk Grenadier to suffer mentally and financially as well has her children innocent victims from his and their actions.
The acts of Mr. DiMuro are egregious and vicious against Janice a pro se, single mom with her 2 girls because they are
Catholic and are x communicated from the Old Boy Network
128.
129.That on April 4, 2014 Ben DiMuroLied in court in Prince William County and Lied in documents submitted to the courts.
130.That on July 16, 2014 Ex Parte communications with Judge Clark
131.
132.That on July 23, 2014 Ben DiMuro hopes to again to manipulate the Judicial System to protect his Client Ilona Grenadier
Heckman from being accountable for her actions
133.
134.Ben DiMuro is being paid by Alps Insurance according to an e-mail from Alps Insurance Co.
135.
136.That Ben DiMuro, John Tran & Hillary Collyer, and Andrea Mosley ccd each other regularly on documents submitted with
the Court, letters, e-mails sent to JWG. Making an action of one an action of all Four- DiMuroGinsberg Law firm.
137.

14. STATE OF VIRGINIA ACTORS: JUDGE JAMES CLARK (JUDGE CLARK) guilty of:
Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang
Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Attempt to harm Plaintiff and her Girls through Drugs & Rape,
Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the
Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court,
TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b)and
other laws, illegal jailing and torture of Janice Ignoring the Professional Code of Ethics

138.
139.
Judge Clark in collusion with Randy Sengel, Judge Potter, Chief Justice Supreme Court of
Virginia to prevent Janice in front of Grand Jury as Demanded in Order by Chief Justice of the
Supreme court of Virginia. Who knowingly chose Judge Potter from Prince William County who did not
have jurisdiction and would work with the other Judges in kidnapping Janice and her witnesss in
another court room Preventing Janice asking for a Special Grand Jury to look into the corruption and
11

the Criminal Actions of Ilona Grenadier which James Clark is aware of as well as Chief Justice Cynthia
Kinser and Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel Bryan Porter
140.
141.
January 18, 2012 Janice Filed Motion for
sanctions against Randy Sengel commonwealth attorney for letter to Judge Potter
142.
January 18, 2012 Janice Filed a Praecipe to be
heard on January 25, 2012
143.
January 25, 2012 Judge Clark refuses to hear
claims not on his docket Confirms he has not recused himself from hearing anything from Janice 144.
February 1, 2012 Janice files Motion filed to
demand Ed Semonian Clerk of Court answer simple questions about Grand Jury - Since Alexandria has shown in the
past not to follow the rules of the courts It was reasonable for Janice to ask basic questions which he refused to
answer. Most likely he doesnt know the basic rules.
145.
Parecipe filed on Feb 1, 2012 Janice files for
Motion to be heard on February 8, 2012 by the new Judge - Judge Clark who had not recused himself from hearing
this case. Yet refused to hear Motion against Randy Sengel.
146.
February 2, 2012 Letter Circuit Court of
Alexandria Motion Sanctions against Ed Semonian to be heard at 9am February 13, 2012 by Judge Potter. The
procedures have again been manipulated in the Court.
147.
February 7, 2012 Letter to Circuit Court Judges
& Ed Semonian Janice planed on being in court on February 8, 2012 that Judge Clark had not recused himself.
148.
February 8, 2012 Judge Clark in court confirms
he has not recused himself from the matter and that it isnt on his docket. Yet Judge Clark then turns to a Lawyer and
says yes I am going to hear this even though it is not on my docket.
149.
September 26, 2012 Order awarding Sections to Ben DiMuro / John Tran, Michael Weiser
Affidavit shows more phone calls to Judges chambers then to their own clients refused Janice to call Ilona
Grenadier Heckman as a witness to protect her
150.
October 12, 2012 Mailed back evidence entered into court on September 26, 2014 Mail fraud,
Tampering with evidence, Obstruction of Justice - Collusion of Judicial Misconduct etc
151.
152.
Actions by Judge Clark are and continue to be irrational and without cause, his actions show his
collusion with other Defendants to physically and emotionally to harm Janice.
153.
154.
December 2013 Requested of Ilona to have Janice harmed by Mark / Michael Stuart by drugging Janice
and getting inappropriate sexual photos of Janice or to rape one of her girls or plant drugs on one of the girls or in
the home. That Janice was informed and believes it to be true the Order came from Judge Clark.
155.
156.
July 16,2014 Obvious Ex Parte Communications with a special Order demanding Janice to COA Court
on July 23, 2014 which he does not have Jurisdiction. That all his Orders are VOID
157.
158.
July 23, 2014 Janice by all appearance with the collusion of Ben DiMuro is to be in Court in the City of
Alexandria Va so Ben DiMuro can further confuse two cases so he can try and have it clarified so it will not show
the appearance that he LIED IN Prince William Court in April of 2014. Judge Clark has received a letter
saying he should recuse himself and this suit is going to be filed. That lawyer Ben DiMuro will not work with
Janice who needs at a minimum 6 hours to call 9 witnesss to present her side of the case. The Judges in PWC in
collusion with Judge Clark deny Janice any type of defense. That they call her defense Frivolous is slanders and
libel as there is nothing FRIVOLUS of Judges and Lawyers committing Treason, ignoring the laws, the rules and
the Constitution of the United States of America.
159.

12

160.
That Judge Clark on October 22, 2014 illegally had Janice jailed. That Judge Clark on November 12,
2014 released Janice after Janice had snuck out documents. That Judge Clark refused a court reporter or any
recording device to be used. That Judge Clark refused Janice to read her statement and Judge Clark turned to
attorney Michael Wieser and stated I am so sorry I can not collect your legal fees for you, you will have to
come back and get a Judgment which Michael Wieser never did and Ilona Grenadier is now using Orders
that are VOID by Judges that did not have jurisdiction to try and steal Janices home.
161.
162.
That October 22, 2014 Janice was Jailed 22 days / 14 days Solitary Confinement by the City of
Alexandria, Virginia illegal for legal fees that the lawyers had lied in court, lied in court documents, used bribery,
ex-parte communications as documented in affidavits for legal fees, e-mail from Alps insurance saying they were
paying the legal fees Janice was released early after sneaking documents out
163.

While in Jail Janice was tortured by Sheriffs et al with the following:

14 days Solitaire Confinement till 5pm on election day to prevent disclosure of e-mails between Plaintiff and
Senator Mark Warner
2 Denied phone calls till 10 pm on 1st day and most days by being in Solitaire Confinement and phone control
3 Woken up every 2 hours at night
4 Not allowed out of cell till 2 or 3 am for by required 1 hour
5 Sat down and told I had less rights than someone who murdered someone
6 No Advocate
7 Denied mail returned to sender saying I was not there
8 Denied copy of any type of order denying my mail or having it opened prior to my receipt of it
9 Stripped searched patted down men watching me shower
10 Warned by Magistrate if I continued my quest for Justice it would only get worse for me and my girls

164.
15. STATE OF VIRGINIA ACTORS: JUDGE CARROLL A. WEIMER JR. (JUDGE WEIMER)
Inforcing the Order of Chief Judge Mary Grace OBrien (PWC) is guilty of: Judicial Misconduct,
Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior
Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail
Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction
of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983
Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b)and other laws

165.
166.
December 27, 1990 Judge Percy Thornton Jr., Judge H. Selwyn Smith, Judge Herman A. Whisenant Jr.,
Judge Frank A. Hoss, Jr., Judge William D. Hamblen, filed the following Order to the Supreme Court of Virginia:
(Plaintiff found this by chance on or around April 11, 2014 New Evidence - ignored)
167.
Order
168.
169.
Ilona Ely Grenadier, one of the Defendants in the above-styled Chancery No. 30211, is a member of the local Bar
170.
November
2007
Judge
refused
to do the
of of
rulling
on case against
Ilona
Grenadier
who regularly
practicesof
law
before
thisHoss
Court.
Therefore,
the favor
Judges
the Thirty-First
Judicial
Circuit
deemasit a
favor
for
Judge
Haddock.
Which
shows
in
September
of
2007
when
the
Slippery
Slope
started
the
Judges
improper
any one of them to preside in this case, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is requested to knew
designate
circuit
court
judge to preside over this case.
exactlyanother
what they
were
doing.
171.
Entered 27thApril
Day of
172.
4, December,
2014 Chief1990
Judge Mary Grace OBrien supported and allowed Ben DiMuro lawyer for Ilona
Signed
by:Judge
Thornton
Judge
H. Selwyn
Smith,
Judge
Herman
A. Whisenant
Jr., Judge
Frank
Grenadier Heckman to LiePercy
in Court,
Lie inJr.,
Court
documents
and
awarded
him
over $12,000.00
in legal
fees. Judge
A. Hoss, Jr., Judge William D. Hamblen
OBrien did not have Jurisdiction, and the decision had been decided prior to court. Judge OBrien would not allow
Plaintiff to call her witnesss
16. BWW LAW GROUP aka Bierman, Geezling, (BWW LAW) Janice will SHOW MOTIVE OF BWW
LAW GROUP TO CLAIM OWNERSHIP OF ALLEGED LOAN AND TO IGNORE THE

13

FORECLOSURE DATE OF OCWEN That Janice found to add additional information that has just been
released on the internet in regard to Defendant Howard Bierman / BWW Law Group / Equity Trustees being
held accountable and admonition by the Virginia State Bar in 2009 represented by Lawyer Ben DiMuro:

173.
174.

This is important new evidence as it ties in and shows the participation of the lawyers Troutman
Saunders aka Mays & Valentine and the BWW Law Group/ Equity Trustees and Howard Biermans
participation in the scheme of having me jailed (Tortured). Janice further will show the events and order
of events why Howard Bierman would claim ownership of the alleged loan and tell OCWEN they were
Foreclosing even though they did not have that authority according to the Rules of the Harp, the
Government, OCWEN and attorney Robert Michael who works at BWW Law Group/ Equity Trustees
with Howard Bierman and is representing them as council wanted to be sure that Janice knew they did
not own the alleged loan nor did they ever own any loans.
175.
17. TROUTMAN SANDERS aka MAYS & VALENTINE (TROUTMAN SANDERS) That for
Troutman Saunders in the accountability to Defendant and others for the theft of funds from Trust
Accounts from the purchase of Mays and Valentine. That a property that settled in April of 2014
made the thefts a continuing crime from November 1983 and voided all Statue of Limitations as the
acts and actors acted to scheme and further cover up thefts that Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman
used a forged Trust Agreement, that Lawyer Jim Arthur and others were or should have been aware
of and manipulated $30,000. along with a great loss of business of Plaintiff. That Troutman
Sanders / Mays and Valentine have been put on notice of their involvement of such criminal acts, but
are still representing OCWEN and Wells Fargo in the Federal Court over a Foreclosure attempt by
BWW Law group who was and is in collusion with Lawyer Ilona, and Ben, DiMuroGinsburg, Parker
Simon & Kokolis, LLC
176.
18. WELLS FARGO BANK Claims ownership of a loan at 15 W. Spring Street. Documents show at one time
such loan was on the same balance sheet as LaSalle Bank / Bank of America. That Equitee Trustees owned
by BWW Law Group / Howard Bierman also at one time claimed ownership of such loan. Not any entity as
shown true ownership without forged signatures of Lawyer Howard Bierman et al others on instruments that
are filed in the courts or went through the mail to Janice. Making several actions of these lawyers criminal
with the Banks consent.

177.
178.
That the above Plaintiffs in the Complaint and Counter Complaint have all worked in collusion to
Discriminate and have Schemed to steal Real Property known as 15 West Spring Street, Alexandria, Virginia
22301, and other property. That Janice the ORDERS will show was never allowed a defense, that all court
hearings were Kangaroo type court hearings. That all are guilty of different and some the same criminal and

14

civil acts as described through out this complaint. That Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman has stolen, lied to,
maliciously with intend to harm emotionally and physically from Plaintiff since February 14, 1986.
179.

180.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

181.

Janice incorporates by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 18 above


182.
19. It should be noted on May 7, 2015 Chief Judge Craig D. Johnston of Prince William County, Stood Up
and did the right thing. In his court room Janice witnessed him after 25 years giving Joseph Richard Perry
Jr. back his life. He ruled and was very clear in his Order that when a Judge does not have Jurisdiction
the Order is VOID. That Judge Hoss did an affidavit for Mr. Perry. Case No. 14-18136, 07023762 In
the Circuit Court of Prince William County. That no Judge can rule in Favoritism and Cronyism but, must rule
by the law and rules and recuse himself when necessary. What has happened to Mr. Perry, to Chris Mackney
who Judge Bellows pushed with the help of Pete Scamado to commit Suicide in Fairfax VA and many others
is, no different than what is happening to Janice Wolk Grenadier and the apparent hope she also would
commit suicide is the obvious plan of Judge Clark et al and others.
183.
20. That the same Judge Judge Hoss on or around December 27, 1990 with all the Judges in Prince William
County recusing themselves in Case Chancery No. 30211 Stating the following with Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman:

184.
185.
Order
186.
187.
Ilona Ely Grenadier, one of the Defendants in the above-styled Chancery No 30211, is a member of the
local188.
Bar who regularly practices law before this court. Therefore, the Judges of the Thirty-First Judicial
189.
Circuit deem it improper for any one of them to preside in this case, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme
Court is 190.
requested to designate another circuit court judge to preside over this case.
21. That Judge Hoss when requested by Judge Donald Haddock to participate in his Scheme for a
to 1990
LOVE Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman Judge Hoss recused
Entered this women
27th dayhe
of claimed
December,
himself a second time further shows the Deliberate and Knowledgably willful acts were and
Signed by: are
Percy
Thorntonviolent,
Jr. Judge
malicious,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless against Janice Wolk
A Selwyn
Smithby Judge
Grenadier
Judge Donald Haddock and others.
Herman
A
Whisenant,
Jr Judge
191.
Frank A.More
Hossbackground
Jr. Judge as to why:
192.
William
D.
Hamblen
Judge
193.
194.
This Order on its own set precedence to prevent any type of perceived conflict of interest.
195.
22. On or around November 30, 1983 Lawyer Ilona was involved in the FORGING of the Sonia Grenadier
TRUST ADDENDUM Trust giving Lawyer Ilona Power of Attorney should anything happen to Albert
Grenadier. This act and action has been ignored by the City, the State and all Law enforcement even though
it is a continuing crime in April of 2014 when she signed as owner and sold the property - she stole out of
the Sonia Grenadier Trust trough Stonewall Title and once again the Title Company looked the other way.
196.
23. In March of 1985 Judge Albert Grenadier dies.
197.
24. On or around May 20, 1985 Jim Arthur informs Sonia Grenadier about the Trust and her will
198.
25. On or around July 23, 1985 GIC (to purchase Real Estate) is established between Ilona (51%) and David
Grenadier(49%)

15

199.
26. Soon after July 23, 1985 by all appearance and evidence the Stealing of funds from the Sonia Grenadier Trust
begin by Ilona or David at the Grenadier et al law firm for the personal benefit of Ilona and David
200.
27. On or around December 9, 1985 a letter with the Grenadier et al letter head is written for the benefit of Sonia
Grenadier establishing the relationship between the Grenadier et al law firm
201.
28. On or around December 6, 1985 Official letter written to Lawyer Ilona from Jim Arthur that the Addendum is
forged and not enforceable with the collusion of Jim Arthur, Lawyer Ilona and her law firm continues to
control Sonia Grenadier Trust
202.
29. On or around February 14, 1986 (new evidence recently learned) Lawyer Ilona took a property called Bristow
Road and put it in Lawyer Ilonas name along with Alberts sister Ruth Subitzkys name. Claiming Lawyer
Ilona put Ruths name on such property out of the goodness of Lawyer Ilonas heart. Which reviewing the
title and documents in Prince William County it is in conflict with the evidence that this property was ever
taken legally out of the Trust that was established after the death of Herman Grenadier. By all appearance
Lawyer Ilona knowingly used the forged Trust addendum to transact this theft of by appearance and
documents from land records That an accounting needs to be done to established where funds that were by
appearance received in 1986 went for a part of the sale of this land. If more money was stolen at this time by
Ilona and or Grenadier et al law firm. By appearance this started out as 500+ acres with disbursement of sale
at 3 different times
203.
1. August 1983 of $81,000
204.
2. October 4, 1984 of $200,000.
205.
3. February 1986 of $521,063.50. Money that by all appearance illegally went to Ilona
Grenadier Heckman Leaving the approx. 193 acres that are being sold in April 2014. The property with illegal
signatures sold on or around April of 2014. Making this an on going crime and as the Judges not having
Jurisdiction opens these criminal acts.
206.
30. On or around March 18, 1986 Ilona an attorney knowing the Addendum is forged by all appearance
donates Herman Grenadiers Garden at King David and by all appearance steals Herman Grenadiers body
and moves it to a Garden Ilona claims to own. Ilona told Janic that Ilona used the Garden donated on her tax
return as a donation. (this is all new evidence that came out around July of 2011) Ilona wrote to the children
of Ruth Subitzky who is buried with her brother, father, and mother that a stranger was in her garden that
Ilona claims to have never given permission to be buried. Not only did Ilona an attorney steal Ruths father
from his resting place, Iloa an attorney stole his Garden donating it and by appearance taking it as a personal
tax deduction. King David show Ilonas signature and claims Ilona used a Trust agreement to sign for and for
the actions above. Ilona then went on to file a false report with the State of Virginia on or around January or
February of 2012 after knowing that she had signed the appropriate documents for Ruth Subitzky her sisterin-law to be buried with her family. Ilonas relationship with Ruth was also as a client and Ruth paid for
Ilonas services. By all appearance Ilona met with Ruths children in or around April of 2011 and hinted to an
issue, but waited till the statute of limitations of 3 years to turn over any files that Ilona had on Ruth to the
family could be enforced. These acts and other actions of Ilona have been willful acts that were and are
ongoing malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless

207.
31. On or around December of 1986 with Janice not being aware of the manipulative personality of Ilona and
David gets into a partnership called 28 E. Bellefonte Ave. Janice is deceived in loaning GIC $3,600. (aka
David Grenadier). Which with the money by all appearance received from the manipulation and sale of part
of the Bristow Rd. property in February of 1986 this loan and the extra funds in renovation Janice paid should
be considered Fraud by the Ilona and David. Ilona was well aware Janice was receiving a $30.000.
Settlement check at this time. Lawyer Ilona and David manipulated as much of that money as they could to
their benefit is now clear with this new evidence.
208.

16

32. On or around August 24, 2987 Jim Arthur at the request of Ilona sends letter to Sonia Grenadier to start
selling off property that she owns by all appearance this would give Lawyer Ilona and or her law firm
more funds to steal from.
209.
33. On or around the fall of 1989 Sonia Grenadier starts requesting an accounting of her funds.
210.
34. On or around October 30, 1989 Lawyer Ilona / GIC purchased a property called Southway Terrace in Triangle
Va for approx. $2.9 million dollars (approx. 80 condo units). This was purchased with no money down and
Lawyer Ilona/ GIC walking away with approx. $40,000 after settlement costs. The property at the time
appraised for $3.2 million. The Lawyer Ilona / GIC was offered $100,000 to flip the contracts and declined.
Lawyer Ilona / GIC (David) were present at all walk thrus and inspections. In 2007 Tax assessments
Southway was valued at $8,537,200. Today Market Value is easily over $12 Million as the properties value is
as Condos and each one can be sold off separate.
211.
35. On or around March 2, 1990 Jim Arthur sends letter to David Grenadier / Grenadier Investment Co. revoking
authority to act as agent in matters for the Sonia Grenadier Trust. This is included Lawyer Ilona and her Law
Firm.
212.
36. The manipulation and the intimidation and willful acts that were and are ongoing malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless against Janice go into full force by Lawyer Ilona. Lawyer
Ilona is aware and knows more than Janice is able to manipulate Janice knowing Janice is pregnant and is
emotionally still scared by a miscarriage at 5 months in April of 1989. That Janice was raped in college and
understands Justice after sitting through a trial by Jury with him going to jail for 6 years. That Janice was
sensitive to the word rape and the outcome of it. Lawyer Ilona would say to Janice if you dont do this
you could be visiting your husband and taking your children to see him the day after he had been
raped Lawyer Ilona knew how to control Janice, and manipulate Janice, because of Janices strong family
values.
213.
37. That Lawyer Ilona was upset about the letter written on or around December 9, 1985 to a car dealer ship on
Ilonas law firm stationary establishing the relationship of Ilona and her law firm with the Sonia Grenadier
Trust. Yet Ilona would use her letter head throughout the negotiations with Jim Author claiming she was
acting as attorney for David, Janice and herself.
214.
38. That Lawyer Ilona sent Janice by all appearance to represent her law firm in the accounting of funds stolen
through her law firm to Jim Arthur at Fagelson et al law firm.
215.
39. That Janice at this time found $54,000 approx. possible $65,000 missing yet Lawyer Ilona tells Jim Arthur
around much less more like $30,000 to 40,000..
216.
40. That Janice on or around July 5, 1990 went into labor delivering her fist little girl at 4.45 pm on July 6, 1990
in an emergency C-section with a room full of Children heart specialist from Georgetown. That Janice was
dealing with the life of her first child after losing one at 5 months in April of 1989. Lawyer Ilona calls Janice
at approx. 9.00 am on the morning of July 7, 1990 prior to Janice knowing the outcome of her daughters
heart issue and her daughter still in intensive care unit. Tells Janice I have come up with a solution to the
theft of funds Janice will need to sign over $30,000. Commission and in return David will sign a Note to
JWG for 10% interest and due in 30 Years again If you do not agree to this and I am not able to negotiate
this deal than you and A will be visiting him in jail as that is where Robin wants to see him, you will be
visiting him most likely after he had been raped the night before Janice agreed. Lawyer Ilona never asked
how A was. Lawyer Ilona at this point and many other points established a Client relationship with Janice,
that has now been reviled with all the new evidence since May of 2008 was to protect Lawyer Ilona and her
law firm.
217.
41. On or around November 14, 1990 Lawyer Ilona informs Janice and David is working out a settlement of
$40,000 stolen - $8,000 in interest to be paid back to the Sonia Grenadier Trust. (Lawyer Ilona from Janices

17

accounting at this point is aware that much more was stolen from the Sonia Grenadier Trust new evidence
shows from Lawyer Ilonas accounting and Yoav Katz Lawyer Ilonas CPA accounting most likely $95.000
or more was stolen out of the Sonia Grenadier Trust by Ilona an attorney through her law firm.) That this will
be paid back by David $30,000. (with a note in return which Lawyer Ilona will do, and the Janice must give
up client of land due to privacy of this matter needed) That David Grenadier will then sign a note for $18,000.
To the Sonia Grenadier trust The Truth now know and as the facts have exposed themselves these acts by
Lawyer Ilona with deliberate and manipulative willful acts that were and are ongoing malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless.
218.
42. On or around November of 1991 the property called Holland Road went to settlement with the $30,000
commission being assigned to Jim Arthur / Mays & Valentine for Sonia Grenadier Trust. Negotiated by
Lawyer Ilona acting as Janices attorney Lawyer Ilona creating the note for the $30,000. Insisting on
keeping all copies for the safety of it. Janice losing a client that Janice needed. These acts by Ilona as an
attorney were deliberate and manipulative willful acts that were and are ongoing malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless.
219.
43. On November 6, 1991 Janice had her second C-section and delivered her second little girl M. with no let
up on of the manipulation by Ilona as an attorney whose actions were deliberate and manipulative willful acts
that were and are ongoing malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless to protect
herself and only her.
220.
44. Shortly after the birth of M Janice takes girls ( A is approximately 19 months and M is about 2 months)
to visit Sonia Grenadier great grandmother. During visit Sonia trips on a toy Janice is told by Lawyer Ilona
that Robin is accusing Janice of trying to kill Sonia and she is no longer allowed by the family to have any
type of relationship with Sonia Sonia Grenadier died never seeing her great grand daughters again. Janice
believes this was partially a lie by Lawyer Ilona to protect Lawyer Ilona from the whole Truth coming out.
221.
45. On or around January 23, 1992 a letter from Jim Arthur now with Mays and Valentine (now Troutman
Sanders) outlines the negotiated settlement to prevent legal action. This settlement was 100% negotiated by
Ilona as an attorney for David Grenadier in reality the evidence now shows Lawyer Ilona was acting in only
Lawyer Ilonas self-interest.
222.
46. On or around October 21, 1992 in a refinance funds from 28 E. Bellefonte were taken from Janice to pay
down a loan for Southway Terrace that benefitted only Lawyer Ilona. David Elsberg attorney for the
settlement had Janice write a letter detailing where the funds were going and that it was a loan to GIC.
223.
47. On or around October 20, 1993 Jim Arthur goes to jail for what Lawyer Ilona has done for 5 years. These
crimes on going today were and are being covered up by Troutman Sanders aka Mays & Valentine
224.
48. On or around May 25, 1994 James Korman of Bean, Kinney & Korman negotiates a new settlement with
Lawyer Ilona acting as Davids attorney. In letter mentioning the $30,000. Paid by Janice
225.
49. Janice Then on or around September 3rd of 1997 that on an unexpected cab ride to the airport as Janices xhusband David Grenadier (son of the late Judge Albert Grenadier and step-son of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely
Freedman Grenadier Heckman of Greanadier Anderson Starace Duffett and Kieser) as he was suppose to take
Janice to the airport and was late, Janice was outside waiting and not in her home. Janices x-hsuband as
Janice had called him to find out where he was started yelling at her and saying a cab was on the way.
Janice can persume now his disappointment the money it appears he and Ilona spent to have Janice killed has
come back to haunt them. When Janice got in the cab and the driver could hear David yelling he said to
Janice hang up the phone, hang up the phone if you dont hang up the phone I will pull over and hang it up
for you. Janice hung up the phone, the driver than said we can take care of that for $5,000.00 you dont
have it then $2,000 we can work it out. Janice was handed a phone number, Janice tossed it in the trash can
thinking it had been a set up Janice now believes with out question it was to be a hit and today she was to be
dead. Janice has never been questioned by the City of Alexandria Police or the FBI even though she has

18

reached out several times with her information.through Commonwealth Attorney Brian Porter & Sheriiff
Lawhorene (who had her tourtured in jail)That in February / March of 1998 Nancy Dunning who would open
her front door in 2003 came to Janice on different occations to check on her safty. The question know arrises
was she aware of the outcome that was meant for Janice in September of 1997.
226.
50. In the fall of November 1997 Lawyer Ilona in a letter dated May 2008 shows collusion in a rumor that was
being spread that David Grenadier was sleeping with his sister Andrea. Due to this David pulled a gun in
Janices home with young daughters in the home.
227.
51. On or around November 17, 1997 Divorce Lawyer Ilona using an attorney not licensed to do business in
Virginia does a Liquidation Agreement for GIC. Ilona a divorce attorney is well aware of the fact that Janice
has co-mingled more funds than her husband David Grenadier had personally put into the partnership.
Lawyer Ilona again through manipulation and lies knowing divorce is looming that her son is about to leave
Janice has David sign such agreement. Partnership Liquidation Agreement did not hold up to the law when
28 E. Bellefonte Ave was sold. Lawyer Ilona actions again were for personal gain and willful acts.
228.
52. In the fall of November 1998 Lawyer Ilona in a letter dated May 2008 shows collusion in a rumor that was
being spread that David Grenadier was sleeping with his sister Andrea. Due to this David pulled a gun in
Janices home with young daughters in the home.
229.
53. In or around 2001/2002 Lawyer Ilona manipulate Federal Bankruptcy by lying again about the money
that was borrowed by Lawyer Ilona / GIC to purchase Southway Terrace in the refinance of property 28 E.
Bellefonte. Again actions that were deliberate and manipulative willful acts that were and are ongoing
malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless to protect herself and only her. Which
now constitutes the reopening of Janice divorce the Fraud that has been since 1986 against Janice by
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckma that with the new evidence is obvious to a lay
person.
230.
54. April 1989 - attorney Ben DiMuro met with Janice and David her husband on or around April of 1989
they met in his law office to discuss a fire that he was representing GIC/Monroe Ave partnership for the
coverage on the insurance from a fire. Which at the time it was told to JWG he was representing JWG and
her husband (GIC) for the portion of the overage that they were being sued for. Conflict of interest to now
represent Ilona against Janice? But, continues representation.
55. September 5, 2007 - Filed with the Alexandria Circuit Court a Motion for Reinstatement of the Bill of
Complaint of 28 E Bellefonte Ave Partnership. The notification to the parties to be served through the
Sheriffs office. The court date for the Motion was on September 12, 2007.
56. September 12, 2007 - Motions Day Judge Kloch hears the case. This resulted in the Filing of the Motion
for Default filed on September 21, 2007. As the Motion for Default goes into more detail Mrs. Grenadier was
disingenuous in court claiming she hadnt been served. But, she couldnt have known of the court date unless
she was served. She admitted in court to Judge Kloch that David Grenadiers attorney Mr. Michael Weiser
was aware of the court date because she had faxed the information to him. Judge Kloch kept passing it over
to give Mr. Weiser the chance to show up. He then sent a clerk down to the Sheriffs office who then came
back and according to Judge Kloch said that Ms. Ilona Grenadier nor Mr. Weiser had been served according
to their (the Sheriffs) records. Janice explained to the Judge the only way Mrs. Grenadier could be there was
if she was served. Mrs. Ilona Grenadier admitted to having the information and faxing it to Mr. Weiser. At
which point he dismissed everything to be re-heard. Mrs. Grenadier a lawyer had not been telling the
truth when she said she hadnt been served. The Slippery Slope begins for a fight for Judge with
Jurisdiction that is not ruling on Favoritism and Cronyism.
57. After Court Janice went down to the Sheriffs office. Janice was given a copy of Mrs. Grenadiers service.
Mr. Weisers papers were not in the box, and as his office is basically the same building they couldnt say
whether he had been served or not. To this day the papers are missing and have never been returned to JWG.

19

It should be noted that Mr. Weisers office is in the same building as the Court House and Sheriffs, who claim
to not have served him.`
58. September 21, 2007 - Janice filed for the Motion for Default, and The Motion to Reinstate (just in case) for
October 10, 2007. - Motion for Default filed (written by federal Judge in DC)
59. October 10, 2007 All the Alexandria Judges have recused themselves from hearing it and they need to bring
in an impartial Judge. This is the start of shopping for Judges that would rule in favor of Lawyer Ilona .
Even when Ilona would brag afterwards about her relationship with the Judge and how he had called her
when he was practicing law and she would help him out
60. October 17, 2007 Letter from Diane Fiske After informing Janice that the Judges had recuse
themselves she would be finding Judges to hear the case. Judge Frank A. Hoss was available for November
28, 2007 at 10.00 am. At the time of this letter the Judges were:
1 Judge Donald M. Haddock We learned in the Spring of 2008 he had recused himself from hearing the case, yet
continued to choose the Judges after declaring his LOVE for Ilona.
2 Judge John E. Kloch Ilona had lied to him in court on September 5, 2007 He could have heard the Motion for
Default as he knew the truth Recused himself with letter of apology and Statement Appellant deserved a fair
hearing and that The appearance of Justice was just as important as Justice itself
3 Judge Lisa Bondareff Kemler Her Father was our pediatrician for Janices girls, David had gone to Hebrew
School with her, His father and her father were good friends, Janice had shown her and her husband Real Estate.
231.
61. November 15, 2007 Letter from Diane Fiske that the Motions Date had been changed to Wednesday,
December 5, 2007 @ 10.00 am - this had been filed on September 21, 2007 Is now being heard on
December 5, 2007. Where most Motions are heard 7 days later this took 2.1/2 months to be heard. By all
appearance due to the need of shopping for a Judge.
62. The three (3) attached letters from Diane Fiske court administrator shows the City of Alexandria Circuit Court
did not make a mistake. The actions of the City of Alexandria Circuit Court were knowingly and
malicious to shop for Judges that would Rule in favor of attorney Ilona Grenadier Heckman. That
Judge Hoss from Prince William County had in 1990 recused himself from hearing any cases that involved
Ilona Grenadier Heckman. By all appearance he knew it was inappropriate for him to hear this case. In the
Motion to Re-Open due to the Fraud on the Court is signed by Judge Hoss of Prince William County.
That once Judge Hoss by all appearance recused himself a 2nd time. The Judges in the Circuit Court
cannot say any longer a mistake was made. The Judges in the Circuit Court of Alexandria knew exactly what
they were doing. That they knew of the Supreme Court rule Supreme Court Rule 17.1-105(B) and chose
not to follow the rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. Attached find Letters:
Dated: October 17, 2007, November 15, 2007 That pertain to Judge Frank Hoss who had recused himself
back in 1990 and by all appearance recuses himself again.
Dated: May 13, 2008 sent just a few days after Chief Judge Haddock explains to Appellant You will never get a
fair Trial WE LOVE ILONA These letters expose the collusion of the Circuit Court Judges in the State of
Virginia FRAUD ON THE COURT TREASON on the Court. This by all appearance shows the disingenuous
behavior of the Supreme Court of Virginia in ignoring their own Rules and Laws to protect one of their own.
63. December 5, 2007 - Judge Thomas A. Fortkort. Denied Janices Motion for Default. It should be noted the
Motion for Default was a suggestion & outlined by a Federal Judge from DC.
64. December 2007 - Janice Asked Diane Fiske Several times about a Fair Judge she informs Janice the
only way anyone else (Supreme Court choses Judge) Is if they cant find one. Which is incorrect the rule is
the complete opposite
232.
in accordance with 17.1-105(B): Learn of June of 2010
If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal, pending in their court
as to render it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or proceeding is removed,
as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the

20

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge of
any such court to preside at the trial of such case.
65. February 8, 2008 - JWG receives a Letter From Ilona Grenadier (on her law firm stationary) to Janice Wolk
Grenadier, Ilona Grenadier asserts ownership of 75% of a property Known as 28 East Bellefonte Ave,
Alexandria, VA 22305. JWG also felt threatened by the letter which is full of misleading and deceitful
statements.
66. February 13,2008 Judge Brown hears Motions * Ilona is not in court Heather Jenquien represented her.
Motions to compel 67. February 26, 2008 Filed with Clerk of Courts following letter: Because keep in mind all Judges had
recuse themselves and all Motions had to go through Diane Fiske as she needed to shop for a judge or it had
to be on a day they had a visiting Judge that would rule in collusion with Judge Haddocks LOVE for Ilona.
The letter asks Ilona for dates to get back to Diane Fiske to file a Motion as no Motions could be filed
without everyones ageing on the date before Diane found a Judge.
68. February 27, 2008 - Ilona Grenadier filed on February 27, 2008 with the Circuit Court of The City of
Alexandria an Answer to The Amended Bill of Complaint claiming 75% ownership of the property at 28 East
Bellefonte Ave., Alexandria, VA 22305 which is a documented lie. Most of Ilona Grenadiers statements in the
Answer to The Amended Bill of Complaint were disingenuous which Plaintiff has supplied documentation to
VSB for the purpose of establishing the truth. The following are the lies Ilona Grenadier Filed with the
Circuit Court of Alexandria
1 75% ownership
2 That plaintiff has provided no proof of actual payment for expenses - provided 3 times to defendants
3 Plaintiffs Bankruptcy caused by Bellefonte as Plaintiff in & out - Which now Plaintiff realizes she would
never had been in and out if it wasnt for the manipulation and lies of Ilona Grenadier
4 4 times Ilona - Defendant, Ilona Ely Grenadier, denies that Plaintiff owns or owned 50%of East Bellefonte.
233.
69. The document on February 27, 2008 by Ilona Ely Grenadier a lawyer was riddled with Lies - The VSB - The
Judges in Alexandria and her good friend - Judge Brown had no problem with that. This can be backed up
with information/documentation from Admission statements from Ilona Grenadier which had several
conflicting statements. The amount of money Ilona Grenadier put into the property can be established by an
accounting done by Ilona Grenadier. The Accounting shows the 25% down payment that was contributed in
the purchase of the Bellefonte Property. The documents that were filed with the Motion for Default in the
Circuit Court of Alexandria can be used to verify the amount of ownership Ilona Grenadier had. Ilona
Grenadier had in her possession the documents which showed her ownership at the time she filed the
pleadings. Those pleadings were disingenuous and misleading when filed with The Circuit Court of
Alexandria.
70. March 5, 2008 File 2nd Motion for Default to be heard March 12, 2008 for the following reasons:
1 For all the reasons as stated in Motion for Default Dated September 21, 2007
2

For all the untruths told in the Answer to Bill of Complaint by defendant and Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint
filed on February 27, 2008.

For the letters Lawyer Ilona sent bulling, threatening attached to the February Response to Ilona Ely
Grenadier/GIC Motion to Quash Janices Amended Complaint / February 8, 2008.

For the non response to letters to try and set a new date for depositions or to set a trial date.
71. March 5, 2008 Filed Motion to Change Date for: Notice of Deposition and to Set Date for Trial As
Lawyer Ilona would not respond to any correspondence.
72. March 11, 2008 Plaintiff files Praecipe - remove Motions for March 12, 2008 no visiting Judges. As
ordered by Judges Chambers.

21

1
2
3
4
5

Clerk of the Court will please remove from the docket on March 12, 2008 Janice Wolk Grenadiers Motion to
Compel as there isnt a visiting judge available to hear it.
2 This again shows that the Circuit Court Judges had recused themselves. That Janice though out the case voiced
her concern on getting a fair Trial. To the deaf ears of the Circuit Court of Alexandria who took the arrogant
view of doing whatever they wanted to do.
234.
73. April 30, 2008 Parcipe re-file to have Motion for Default heard as Diane Fiske has found a date that works
for the Judges of Alexandria to find a Judge of there choice for May 7, 2008
74. May 7, 2008 Motions heard by Judge Brown Ilona after court informs me after he has ruled in her favor
allowing her to file false papers as an attorney in the Alexandria Circuit Court of law What good friends she
and Judge Brown are and how he called her all the time for legal advice.
75. On or around May 7, 2008 After Court ~
Lawyer Iloan Grenadier again brags about her relationship with the Judges - That she has in the past & continues to
give Free legal advice to Judge Brown.
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier explains to Janice why no one has anything do to with Janices children is because Janice
raised them Catholic. In 19 years she has seen the girls once by her choice.
Lawyer Ilona states: That Janice should be grateful to her for the listing on Holland Road. So Lawyer Ilona could steal
the commission
That Ilona doesnt believe David Stole the money from Sonia Grenadiers Trust - which only left Ilona Grenadier and
her law firm to steal the most likely over $95,000.00
Janice introducers herself to Judge Haddock after he speaks with Ilona he explains to Janice I could never get a
fair trial as they all Love Ilona I turn to Diane Fiske shocked by the statement and express Janice cant believe he
just said that to me.
Again Janice ask Diane Fiske about getting Judges that arent friends of Lawyer Ilonas.
235.
76. May 13, 2008 Letter from Diane P Fiske that the case would be heard by Judge John J. McGrath. This
letter shows the following Judges in the letter head:
1 Donald M. Haddock
2 John E. Kloch (Retired) which means at the time Judge McGrath was chosen Judge Kloch and Judge McGrath
were working together.
3 Lisa Bondareff Kemler
236.
77. June 18, 2008 Plaintiff Files:
1 Motion for Default - Ilona has lied in the Admissions
A For Ilona lying in court to Judge Kloch on September 12, 2007 - Motion for Default
B For Motion for Default filed in February for Lying in the Answer to Bill of Complaint by Lawyer Ilona and
Counter claim and Cross Complaint
C For lies in Admissions by Lawyer Ilona
D For the letters Lawyer Ilona sent Bulling & Threatening Janice if Janice didnt drop suit.
237.
2 Motion for Trial by Jury Due to comments made by Judge Haddock & Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
A Judge Haddock telling Janice she could never get a fair trial as they all LOVE Ilona
B Lawyer Ilona informing Janice all the Judges were friends of hers & Lawyer Ilona gave them free legal advice
when they called her
238.
78. July 2, 2008 Motion to be heard July 9, 2008 to include:
1 Motion for Trial by Jury
2 Motion to Compel
3 Motion for Default

22

1
2
3

1
2
3

239.
79. July 28,2008 1st Complaint - Virginia Bar Complaint Outline / Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman
VSB Docket # 09-NAT-076104
That Lawyer Ilona lied in court on September 12, 2007 All facts can be found in the Motion for Default Dated
September 21, 2009 Which a copy was sent in with the complaint
Letter from Mrs. Ilona Grenadier suggesting Janice had better drop the suit Dated February 8, 2008
Ilona presented false statements in her Counter Claim and Cross Complaint which can be proven through her
own documentation. These false statements were filed and are in Court Record.
240.
80. July 9, 2008 Judge Howe Brown (as Lawyer Ilona calls him a very good friend she often gives free legal
advice to) rules :
Denies motion for Default
Denies motion for Trial by Jury
And makes both sides work on responses in the Motion to Compel- Even though Janice had 110% Answered
241.
81. Spring of 2008 Diane Fiske again advices Janice the only way anyone else would choose a Judge was if
they couldnt find one then it would go to the Supreme Court and they would then choose the Judge. Which
was incorrect / deliberate misleading, Obstruction of Justice. The minute in September of 2007 when the
Judges had recuse themselves is when the Supreme Court should have been choosing the Judges not the
Judges themselves or Diane Fiske should have been choosing the Judge. The Head Judge - Judge Haddock
was talking and hugging Ilona while I was talking with Diane Fiske about Fair Judges that were arms length.
When Ilona left I turned to Judge Haddock and introduced myself which he then went onto inform me I
(Janice) wouldnt get a fair trial because they all Loved Ilona . Judge Haddock is the Head Judge at the
Alexandria Circuit Court. I then turned to Diane Fiske in shock and said I cant believe Judge Haddock
just told me I would never get a Fair Trial because they loved Ilona.
82. August 4, 2008 Janice received a letter from Mr. James C. Bodie saying they would not be taking action
against Ilona. Janice then did pursue it and asked them to review it again after sending in more information.
Janice was also turned down on the review. I was basically told because Ilona wished for a different outcome
her behavior was acceptable to the Virginia Bar, Lying in court, Lying in court documents.
83. September 11, 2008 Thursday Judge John McGrath (chosen by Judge Donald Haddock and working
with Judge Kloch) Court Date - As Justice Douglas would call it Kangaroo Court
A Conference in Judges Chambers Only Ilona & Janice didnt include David Janice in retrospect was told by
another member of the Old Boys Network that she would loose and now realizes how this and other actions
had been discussed and decided to protect one of their own.
B Judge Kloch hanging outside the door during the conference and the trial. Who if he didn
C Sonia Grenadier Trust brought up in opening By Ilona & David and Janice was questioned about it by Ilona
Janice was denied entering evidence or bring it up
D Judge McGrath Wont let Janice bring up Sonia Grenadier Trust & Doesnt understand it wont take time
to understand
E Judge Warns Janice on how Janice can question Ilona
F David Grenadier lies under oath move on per Judge McGrath perjury by David or Ilona was/is acceptable
by the courts
G Judge McGrath & Judge Kloch had a very friendly Lunch at Jackson 20 to discuss how to show appearance
of being fair but, to SCREW Janice, as she is no longer one of the Old Boys Network.
242.
84. Janice is sure something is off and contacts Randy Sengel Commonwealths Attorney Informs me that
Judge McGrath has done a lot of work in Alexandria Circuit Court
85. Janice Calls JIRC Commission Donald Curry good friend to Judge McGrath was raised in Arlington

23

86. Alexandria Circuit Court Yes McGrath is from Harrisonburg But, has several ties to Alexandria & is
working w/ Judge Kloch guess they just didnt think that was important
87. Janice Files complaints w/JIRK Commission of course I didnt have all the information and Donald Curry
who makes decision is friends w/ everyone
88. September 22, 2008 Monday - File Motion for Reconsideration With new evidence that had been dropped
off at Appellants house - A letter that David Ellsberg the Settlement attorney for Bellefonte had me write him
that showed I was loaning the money to Ilona / David / GIC
89. September 24, 2008 - Diane hears back from Judge McGrath doesnt want to see new evidence or any
Exhibits Faxed to him never seeing Exhibits immediately Denies
243.
90. October 21, 2008 Janice Mailed from Alexandria Virginia a complaint against Judge John McGrath to his
good friend Donald Curry w/ the JIRC Commission, after a phone conversations with Mr. Curry, where Mr.
Curry informed Janice sending a complaint would be a waste of time as Judge McGrath was a good friend of
his.
91. October 23, 2008 Donald R Curry Counsel for JIRC sends Janice the following( after telling Janice on the
phone not to bother with a complaint :
244.
This is in response to your complaint dated October 21, 2008. Based upon what you have submitted and
alleged, we have found no basis for a conclusion that there has been a violation of the Canons. A mere belief
that an ex parte communication occurred, without more, does not provide a sufficient basis for Commission
action. Please be advised, moreover, that the judge about whom you complaint is a retired judge from the 26 th
Circuit.
92. October 27, 2008 Janice Fax to Randy Sengel with copy of Complaint and response to JIRC Commission.
How out rages it was. Randy suggestion was Janice address members directly.
93. November 12, 2008 Janice Reached out to each member of the Courts of Justice by Phone or Fax
1 Judge Larry D. Willis
2 Honorable Virginia L. Cochran
3 James F. Fisher Esq
4 William I Fitzgerald
5 Judge Cleo E. Powell
6 Olivia A. Welsh
7 Kenneth Motero 804-786-6634 - Boss to Donald Curry
8 Tim Kaine - Governors office 804-786-2211
9 Bob McDonnel - Attorney General 804-786-2071
10 Donald Curry General Assembly
11 Department of Human Resources Mgt 804-225-2131
245.
Carol Supreme court - HR
246.
Virginia House of Delegates Courts of Justice
247.
1. Dave Albo Chair
248.
2. Pamela Burham
249.
Virginia Senate
1 Henry L. Marsh III Chair Contact Comm operations (804) 698-7450
250.
Delegate - Alexandria
1 David Englin 804-698-1045 703-549-3203
251.
Senator
1 Patsy Ticer 804-698-7530 703-549-5770 Spoke with detail to Peggy Fax# 703-739-6761 - Gave me Mr Henry
Marshs number - information
252.
Congress

24

James Moran
94. November 12, 2008 Fax to Henry Marsh Jackie Parker copy of complaint
95. November 12, 2008 Fax to Dave Albo after horrid conversation. Dave Albo supports the corruption by all
appearance and actions of the Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials.
96. November 12, 2008 Fax: Donald Curry adding letter date May 8, 2008 that Ilona had written to Janice, that
Judge McGrath had used in making his decision on this little meeting prior to court. Which in 45 minutes he
would never had found in a file that was about 8 10 inches in paper work.
97. November 13, 2008 Letter from Donald Curry that the letter I had sent didnt change his mind that there
should be an inquiry into Judge John McGrath.
98. November 13, 2008 letter from Henry L. Marsh lll - He referred me to The Chief Justice of the Virginia
Supreme Court as he was in charge of Substitute Judges. Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell, Sr. 100
North Ninth Street, Richmond, VA 23219.
99. December 8, 2008 - Fax info to Donald Curry he is of no help
100.
December 8, 2008 Calls to Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell Sr. requesting a meeting spoke with
Chief Deputy Clerk Leslie David to put complaint in writing.
101.
December 10, 2008 Letter from Donald Curry they are not looking at my complaint
102.
December 18, 2008 Reach out to John McGrath to get him to do the right thing no word back From
the letter Pleading with him to do the right thing and reconsider the Motion for Reconsideration or at least
be respectful and look at the new evidence. Sent him several e-mails giving him more evidence and do to the
right thing.
103.
December 18, 2008 I learn from the internet that Judge John Kloch is now working with Judge john
McGrath Jr. with a firm called Judicial Solutions PC *In Letter from Judge John Kloch Which even makes
this more of a conflict of interest. Not an arms length situation. If it isnt enough to have the
Commonwealths Attorney tell you Judge John McGrath has done a lot of work in the Alexandria Courts.
253.
104.
April 29, 2009 ~ Virginia Bar Complaint #2
254.
With the first Complaint Ilona had broken the Ethics rule on Knowingly Filing false information with the
courts, making false statements in Court, recording documents along with Admissions statements that were
disingenuous, and lying in Court. She now had broken the Ethics Rule 1.16 (d) and (e) by refusing to give me the
NOTE that she as my lawyer had written and had insisted on being the only one to hold on to it.
255.
I attached much evidence on this complaint of Ilona being very disingenuous. With all her statements she
made and how she mislead all the other attorneys with the truth of the amount of funds that were stolen from the
Sonia Grenadier Trust. I have also shown how she personally financially benefited from all of these actions, my
millions of dollars in Real Estate.
256.
*** These complaints by my understanding from Mr. Edward L. Davis have been combined and looked at
together.
257.
***Appellant feels from his letter he doesnt even understand the complaints nor is he looking at the
evidence that has been provided to show that Ilona is lying.
258.
*** An attorney who teaches Ethics for the VSB helped Appellant to write complaint
105.
In the later part of 2008 2009 Janice reached out to Karen, Andrea, Robin Grenadier and the family
of Ruth Grenadier to apologize and inform them of the TRUTH of what Ilona an attorney had stolen from
the Sonia Grenadier Trust. Through the Grenadier et al law firm. After Ilona informed JWG that JWG should
be grateful to Lawyer Ilona for Lawyer Ilona giving Janice the listing on the property called Holland Road it
started to became clear to Janice the manipulation and the lies and collusion of Lawyer Ilona and x-husband
David Grenadier to steal, lie, cheat and that the collusion now is clear that it started back in October of 1986
and has continued through this case. That Lawyer Ilona will be able to show through pay stubs, through
financial statements and accountings done by Janice that it was with her knowledge this money was stolen out
of her law firm. That trying to silence Janice is about the TRUTH of the Money, Real Estate and other
things stolen from the Sonia Grenadier Trust -

25

106.
The facts The accountings cannot be changed. Ilona Grenadier / Lawyer / has been misleading and
manipulating family members, lawyers, judges since the death of Judge Albert Grenadier.
107.
On or around February 9, 2009 an e-mail from Andrea Grenadier:
259. Thanks, Janice!
260. Interesting point about only inheriting a few thousand from dad. Ilona had re-written dad's will, as you know,
after she had promised him that she would "take care of" his children. Of course, we all found out what "take care
of"
261. meant to her! The several thousand dollars we inherited wasn't actually that much -- it was from an insurance
policy that dad had, and it was about $1,200. She was incredibly pissed when she found out that she had missed
that, because she wanted everything. Dad's former secretary, Agnes Wilkes, knew that there was an earlier will,
and so did Jack Duvall. Ilona said they were both lying.
262. My grandfather's mistake was in trusting too much, and not putting his property in a bypass trust. But when he
died, my parents were splitting up, and there was no reason to believe that dad would marry someone like Ilona.
My grandfather would have been highly distressed to know that someone stole his grandchildren's inheritance,
but this doesn't seem to bother Ilona, who has constantly lied to me, and told me there wasn't anything.
263. Love,
264.
108.
On or around April 16, 2009 Threatening Letter from Ben DiMuro charging Defendant with acts
of Extortion. The Slippery Sloop of the Corruption in the Old Boys Network goes into full force
109.
July 2009 _ Letter Chief Justice Supreme Court of Virginia - ignored
110.
June 21, 2010 - Letter to Patricia L. Harrington Supreme Court Clerk - ignored
111.
August 2010 Virginia Attorney Calls Diane Fiske she confirms all the Judges in The Alexandria
Circuit Court had recuse themselves in September of 2007
112.
July 2010 Janice Confirms the Rule 17.105 (b) with the Supreme Court
113.
July 12, 2010 e-mail to Lawyer Ilona that Janice was filing Motion for Default to be heard on
September 21, 2010 which was originally to be heard on July 28, 2010
114.
July 13, 2010 File Motion
115.
July 26, 2010 w/ 4 min left Michael Wieser files he cant be there in collusion with Judges by all
appearance and ex-parte communications
116.
On or around July 28, 2010 Ilona files Opposition werent we supposed to be in court on the
th
28 ? when she knew
117.
August 4, 2010 After being reprimanded by the Circuit Court about contacting everyone being
treated rudely now every time Janice calls the Alexandria Circuit Court Janice files Motion to be heard on
August 11, 2010
118.
August 11, 2010 Judge Kloch visiting Judge
119.
August 11, 2010 Janice is informed my The Circuit Court they will not take her phone calls or any
messages from her
120.
August 12, 2010 Janice receives an e-mail - Judge Kloch Decides to recluse himself works with
Judge McGrath
121.
Quote from Judge Klochs letter I believe strongly that the appearance of justice is equally
important as justice itself
122.
January 20, 2011 - Janice Appeal to Supreme Court - Record # 110156
123.
February 2, 2011 Lawyer Ilona -Letter Ben Dimuro Giving notice file dismiss of Petition for
Appeal
124.
February 3, 2011 IEG By Lawyers Ben Dimuro / Michael Wieser Joint Motion to Dismiss
Petition for Appeal
125.
February 8, 2011 Janice Petitioners Response to Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition:
For Appeal - Petitioners Response to Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition For Appeal on Page 2
Respondents state Petitioners state Petitioner failed to ensure that the record contains either a transcript or a
written statement of facts necessary to permit resolution of appellate issues is fatal to her appeal.

26

Accordingly, the Petition should be dismissed for Petitioners non-compliance with rule 5:11 Petitioner filed
Court Statement of Facts for October 13, 2010 & October 20, 2010 Order o Made a part of Record in
accordance to Supreme Court Rule 5:11 (c) (1) and (2).
126.
February of 2011 after many phone calls starting on around November 3, 2008 with assistant to Patsy
Ticer a meeting is had even though I live walking distance in Alexandria to have meeting I had to go down
to Richmond which she was still toooo busy to meet with me and set me up with an older women who
claimed ot be her assistant I would find out later that was a LIE Instead: set me up with Martha Kent
x-wife of Judge Kent. I will not be spineless like Martha Kent and Patsy Ticer and allow a bunch of
overgrown BULLIES to control me as they have them. After listening to my story she said to me
265.
o Do you know who I am? no
o I am the x wife of Judge Donald Kent Martha Kent
o I have walked in your shoes you cant win this
o Me and My family cant get a fair trial either
o You are no longer one of them
266.
267.
That is when a few more pieces of the puzzle as to who was the King of the Old Boys Network
started falling into place Who was behind this - it is and was her x-husband Judge Donald Kent best
friend to Judge Donald Haddock on the bench at the same time as Judge Grenadier. Judge Haddock
chose all my Judges and stated to me You will never win this WE LOVE ILONA - Judge Haddock
and Judge Kent by all appearance have done everything they could for there LOVE Judge Donald Kent
was a Judge when Judge Albert Grenadier was in the City of Alexandria by all appearance, and supports
the LOVE Judge Haddock has for Lawyer Ilona.
268.
127.
February 10, 2011
IEG Joint Brief in Opposition to Petition for Appeal
128.
March of 2011 City of Alexandria police, Fire and Ambulance come to the home of Janice Wolk
Grenadier while she is on travel she is supposedly DEAD in the home? There is no record of this in the
City of Alexandria. Two neighbors have confirmed this with Janice and the one who convinced the police to
not hack down her door but to allow him to open it with the key he had. It was not till June of 2011 when
Janices neighbor shared this with her she became aware of it. When researched thier is no record yet two
other neighbors have confirmed this.
269.
129.
May 4, 2011 Supreme Court of Va Letter to Janice May 24, 2011 Oral Argument
130.
May 24, 2011 Janice does: Oral Argument in Richmond
131.
June 20, 2011 Supreme Court Deny Petition Ruling against their own LAW Va. Code
17.105(b) to protect one of their own, for the LOVE of Judge Donald Haddock.
132.
June 27, 2011 Janice Petition for Rehearing
133.
September 20 , 2011 Supreme Court Deny Petition for Rehearing
134.
September 21, 2011
Janice Letters to Judges Brown - McGrath - Fortkort - Dawkins Haddock - That Janice planed on suing them
135.
September 27, 2011 Janice Letter Sengel & Haddock for Grand Jury
136.
September 29, 2011 Sengel Letter to Janice no Grand Jury
270.
137.
October 11, 2011 Janice Files Praecipe to be heard in front of Regular Grand Jury
138.
October 5, 2011 Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel Letter to Janice no not going to let me in
front of Regular Grand Jury
139.
October 6, 2011
Janice letter to Sengel October 6, 2011 - Janice - letter to Ed Semonian
Clerk of Court of the City of Alexandria
140.
October 7, 2011
Sengel e-mail receipt of letter and sent Ed Semonian his letter

27

141.
October 11, 2011 Refused Grand Jury - Grand Jury Case # M01101482 October 2011 Denied access to the Grand Jury and kidnapped with witness into another court room. Even with a Demand
from the Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser to Be allowed into the Grand Jury to request a Special Grand
Jury to review the Corruption
142.
October 14, 2011 Janice Letter to Judge Haddock
143.
October 14 , 2011 Sengel
Letter Judge Haddock retires end of December 31, 2011
144.
October 20, 2011 Janice files in the Eastern District Court of Virginia
271.
Complaint-Conspiracy to interfere with the Civil
Rights 18 USC 241 & 42 USC 1983 Illegal Actions to Deny Access to Grand Jury. Trial by Jury. & More
Emergency Motion for injunctive Relief
272.
145.
October 31, 2011 Janice Letter to Judge Lee
exposing the Corruption
146.
November 9, 2011 Fed Court Order:
a. Deny Request for in forma Paupers due to claim is Frivolous- which is and still is libel and slander to
a ProSe Litigant. Denial of Due Process to someone for Being Poor.
147.
November 16, 2011
Letter from the Circuit
Court of Alexandria that the Supreme Court had conflicts with the date of December 12, 2011 due to schedule
conflicts. The Circuit Court of Alexandria had not filed documents in timely manner
148.
273.
November 21, 2011
Supreme Court Letter
Judge Potter to sit on Grand Jury of February 13, 2012 - Supreme Court Letter - Judge Potter from
Prince William County to sit on Grand Jury of February 13, 2011 There is one matter, In Re: Grand Jury
Request of Janice Wolk Grenadier, scheduled that the Judges have recused themselves from hearing. Order
from the Supreme Court for Judge Potter to assist Alexandria Circuit Court
149.
274.
November 23, 2011 Janice Files with Fed Court:
i. Petition for Reconsideration of the Frivolous Order of 9 November 2011 Complaint Conspiracy to Interfere with the Civil Rights 18 USC 241 & 42 ISC 1983 Illegal Actions to
Deny Access to Grand Jury Trial By Jury
150.
** Janice - Learns about the Magistrate can
also bring charges - Calls City of Alexandria Magistrate to learn that he requires a Police Report - Janice
then calls Detective Pak to ask for Police Report #
151.
In the month of November of 2011 Janice Police
Calls Records in Alexandria to learn - There is no Police report # for the Extortion investigation brought
on by Randy Sengel commonwealths attorney which there is a letter from Ben DiMuro April 16, 2009
charging Plaintiff with acts of Extortion. Janice believes their to be obvious Collusion between Randy
Sengel, Ben DiMuro to assist Lawyer Ilona in intimidation of Janice.
152.
December 20, 2011
Ms. Slaughter Federal
Judge Bruce Lees Secretary lies to Janice
153.
December 21, 2011 File Motion to be heard in
Federal Court January 6, 2012 - denied as Judge Lee is out of town?
154.
December 22, 2011 File in the Supreme Court
of Virginia - Petition for Writ of Error Coram Vobis - Alexandria Court Illegal Actions to Deny Citizen Right
to Trial by Jury and Grand Jury
155.
January 4, 2012
Letter Randy Sengel
Commonwealth Attorney to Judge Potter informing him to refuse Janice in front of the Grand Jury as Janice is
not one of his witnesss
156.
Janice contacts Supreme Court regarding letter
and informed anyone can write to a Judge from
157.
January 4, 2012
Letter from City Attorney
Meghan S. Roberts threatening Janice with legal action over $200. For infractions of code a gutter & RV
parked in my driveway. Collusion with Randy Sengel in attempt to Scare Janice and try to distract and cause

28

more harm. Spring Street Gutters / RV Case # GV 12 3028 - Question should be: How often does an
attorney write a threatening letter over $200. to a homeowner?
275.
158.
January 4, 2012 Letter from Meghan S. Roberts threatening Plaintiff with legal action over $200. For
infractions of code a gutter & RV parked in my driveway. Collusion with Randy Sengel in attempt to
scare/intimidate Plaintiff.
159.
Megan S. Roberts attorney for the City of Alexandria, abusive actions towards JWG are
RETRIBUTION and RETALIATORY ACTIONS for JWG exposing corruption by several taxpayer paid
employees of the Courts of the City of Alexandria. RETALIATORY actions are not legal. Megan S. Roberts
in collusion with The actions of the City of Alexandria, Judges, Commonwealth Attorney, Clerk of Court,
VSB, JIRC, Courts of Justice, the Democratic party, Supreme Court of Virginia has acted intentionally,
willfully, wantonly, and maliciously in their collusion to protect Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman
founding partner to the law firm Grenadier, Anderson, Stracae, Duffett & Kiesler, the late wife of Judge
Albert Grenadier, from being held responsible for her and her law firms criminal activity.
276.
160.
A few days prior to Thanksgiving 2011 (right after receiving documents in the Mail from Judge Clark) a
Code Inspector showed up at JWG home asking how she was coming with getting the gutter re-attached and
the RV moved. JWG explained her financial difficulties and that she would in the next few weeks have the
RV moved and the gutter fixed. He informed her not to worry and call him when it was completed. That with
a moratorium on City workers working on Saturday The Saturday after Thanksgiving they come back to the
home and add additional fees.
277.
These fines came after JWG contacted the Virginia Supreme Court after being blocked from exercising
her RIGHT to speak to the Regular Grand Jury, blocked by both the Presiding Chief Judge Donald M. Haddock of the
City of Alexandria Circuit Court, and by the City of Alexandria Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel.
278.
161.
That the actions of Megan S. Roberts coincide with the actions of other Government employees (Judges,
Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel, Clerk of Court Ed Semonian, etc.) to maliciously intimidate JWG,
this is just one of the many scare tactics they are using, to try and scare JWG from following through with
suits
279.
against other Government employees and complaints against them with other state agencies.
280.
162.
January 7, 2012
Letter Janice to Meghan
S.Roberts that Janice has no intention of paying and reason why
281.
163.
January 18, 2012 Motion for sanctions against
Randy Sengel commonwealth attorney for letter to Judge Potter - ignored
282.
164.
January 18, 2012 Pracipe to be heard on January
25, 2012
283.
165.
January 20, 2012 Letter from Law Clerk Circuit
Court of Alexandria that my Motion for Sanctions against Mr. Sengel would be heard by Judge Potter
284.
166.
February 2012 Filed:
285.
Motion filed to demand Ed Semonian Clerk of
Court answer simple questions about Grand Jury - Since Alexandria has shown in the past not to follow the
rules of the courts It was reasonable for Janice to ask basic questions which he refused to answer. Most likely
he doesnt know the basic rule
286.
167.
Parecipe filed on Feb 1 for Motion to be heard
on February 8, 2012 by the new Judge - Judge Clark who had not recused himself from hearing this case.
287.

29

168.
February 2, 2012 Letter Circuit Court of
Alexandria Motion Sanctions against Ed Semonian to be heard at 9am February 13, 2012
169.
February 13, 2012 The kidnapping of Janice in
court room 4 from the Grand Jury Final Order by Judge Richard Potter - Denied in front of the Grand Jury
he and Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney are now the Gate Keepers of the Grand Jury Treason of our
Constitution by Judge Richard Potter and Randy Sengel
288.
170.
On or around March 9, 2012 Rick @ Neal R. Gross & Co., Inc informs Janice she cant get access to
transcripts without permission from Clerk of Court Lucy S. Janice then has to Fax Neal R Gross copy of
Appeal.
289.
171.
City of Alexandria in collusion to intimidate Janice, files suit against Janice again to take focus off the
issue of the criminal actions of Ilona an attorney.
290.
172.
On the morning of May 14, 2012 JWG delivers letter to Ms. Roberts she is on the list to be sued
with other Government employees and lawyers that have prevented JWG from due process her
United States Constitutional Rights, her Virginia State Constitutional and her Civil Rights.
291.
173.
May 14, 2012 Ms. Roberts has the Code Enforcement Lawmaster do a statement and in turn
files suit against JWG. Mailing out a letter with the suit documents saying Janice had not responded
to the $450. the City ALLEGES the JWG owed. JWG never received a letter from Ms. Roberts in
regard to the $450.00. Ms. Roberts actions in November and May are abusive and RETALIATORY
against Janice for her exposing Alexandria Corruption to Virginias Chief Justice. Janice filed a
Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint. Which was denied by Judge from Arlington who lied in court?
Just one more day of Kangaroo Court to try and intimated Janice.
292.
174.
On or around September 26, 2012 Ilona and Ilonas attorneys show Orders by a Judge that did not have
Jurisdiction and this can be proven by attorneys own affidavits that show more phone calls to Judges
chambers than to clients. This is Michael Weiser and John Tran. Lawyer Ilona and Ilonas attorneys once
again wish to cover up the truth and mislead the courts.
293.
294.
175.
October 2012 Janices documents submitted into the record are mailed back to her by Judges Kemler,
Dawkins and Clark. The box about 4 thick has been x-rayed and shows the documents but, never opened
295.
176.
In the December / January time frame of 2012 & 2013 Lawyer Ilona in collusion with others as a favor
or hired a gentleman that goes by the name of Mark Stuart who informs Janice he was to drug JWG and get
sexual inappropriate pictures of JWG or to rape one of JWGs daughters or to plant drugs on JWGs daughter
or in home to give Circuit Court Judges information to make Janice incompetent to file any other documents.
Mr. Stuart said the Lawyer Ilona will go to any length to harm JWG or JWGs daughters. That Lawyer Ilona
will continue to do what she can to distract Janice from becoming successful and moving on with Janices life.
That Lawyer Ilona is greedy. That all Lawyer Ilonas actions are deliberate to cause harm to JWG. When the
Alexandria Police were called they informed JWG they were instructed by Commonwealth Attorney
Randy Sengel to not take any reports of issue.
296.
177.
On or around May 16, 2013 Janice requested a car that she had purchased and was in the name of Janices
daughter returned or the right to pick it up. Lawyer Ilona in collusion with David Grenadier tried to
intimidate and dare Janice to report them to the police for by all appearance forging documents with the
DMV to get a title and sell the car.
297.
178.
On or around July 16, 2013 Lawyer Ilona in collusion with Andrea and Robin/Racheal Grenadier the day
after Defendants father dies again attacks Defendant in e-mails which re-enforces the hate of Catholics
that Ilona her and family have. Lawyer Ilona again trying to distract from Lawyer Ilonas criminal actions.
This is most likely in regard to the fact that the law by an attorney was pointed out to Janice that she owns

30

24.5% of all properties GIC has as funds were co-mingled and Lawyer Ilona used an attorney not licensed in
Virginia for the Liquidation Agreement and JWG never signed off.
298.
179.
On or around July 12, 2013 after learning of the conflicts and disingenuous behavior of Lawyer Ilona in
Janices Forced Bankruptcy. Defendant revisited all the evidence and filed to re-open her Divorce as no
property settlement had been done. That Ilona an attorney had written one that was not signed that was only a
benefit to Lawyer Ilona. As an attorney Ilona acted again willfully to protect herself and for personal
financial gain.
299.
180.
The law leaves little question that Fraud in procuring a settlement agreement can justify setting aside the
agreement and judgment. Which there was none. E.g., In re Marriage of Modnick, 33 Cal. 3d 897, 191 Cal.
Rptr. 629 (1983); Compton v. Compton, 101 Idaho 328, 612 P.2d 1175 (1980); Anderson v. Anderson, 399
N.E.2d 391 (Ind. Ct. App. 1979); Daffin v. Daffin, 567 S.W.2d 672 (Mo. 1978).
300.
Fraud in procuring a settlement can also be the basis for an independent tort action. Hall v. Hall, 455 So.
2d 813 (Ala. 1984); In re Benge, 151 Ariz. 219, 726 P.2d 1088 (Ct. App. 1986); Dale v. Dale, 66 Cal. App. 4th
1172, 78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 513 (1998); Den v. Den, 222 A.2d 647 (D.C. 1966); Oehme v. Oehme, 10 Kan. App. 2d 73,
691 P.2d 1325 (1984); Burris v. Burris, 904 S.W.2d 564 (Mo. 1995); Carney v. Wohl, 785 S.W.2d 630 (Mo. Ct.
App. 1990); Hess v. Hess, 397 Pa. Super. 395, 580 A.2d 357 (1990). See also Vickery v. Vickery, 1996 WL 255755
(Tex. Ct. App., December 5, 1996) (wife awarded $9 million against husband for fraudulently procuring divorce
and marital settlement agreement, and $450,000 against husbands attorney), affirmed over dissent in light of
Schleuter v. Schleuter, 975 S.W.2d 584 (Tex. 1998), Vickery v. Vickery, 999 S.W.2d 342 (Tex. 1999). See
generally, Robert G. Spector, Marital Torts: The Current Legal Landscape, 33 Fam. L. Q. 745, 757 (1999); Cary
L. Cheifetz, The Future of Matrimonial Torts: The Unmapped Landscape, 15 Fair$hare 4 (August 1995). The
courts are especially harsh with spouses that commit fraud who are attorneys. Anderson v. Anderson, 399 N.E.2d
391 (Ind. Ct. App. 1979); Scholler v. Scholler, 10 Ohio St. 2d 98, 462 N.E.2d 158 (1984); Webb v. Webb, 16 Va.
App. 486, 431 S.E.2d 55 (1993).
181.
Lawyer Ilona in all actions has made herself a party to this divorce Thus, where a spouse and another
person act in concert for the common purpose of defrauding the other spouse, an action for conspiracy will
lie.
301.
Conspiracy was also accepted in Dale v. Dale, 66 Cal. App. 4th 1172, 78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 513 (1998), where
the wife sued for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, constructive fraud, intentional and negligent misrepresentation,
conversion, conspiracy, fraudulent conveyance, constructive trust, and declaratory relief. In this case, the wife
claimed that after the husband was served with divorce papers, he and his bookkeeper withhold from billing
patients, withheld monies received as payments to the accounts receivable, falsified ledgers, financial statements,
and income tax returns, and otherwise acted in concert to artificially reduce the value of the husbands medical
practice. The California appellate court upheld the wifes claims. Accord Liles v. Liles, 289 Ark. 159, 711 S.W.2d
447 (1986) (wife awarded damages for husbands attorneys fraud and misrepresentation in wifes suit to set aside
property settlement agreement); Carney v. Wohl, 785 S.W.2d 630 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990) (upholding wifes claim of
fraudulent misrepresentation against husband and husbands father); Vickery v. Vickery, 1996 WL 255755 (Tex.
Ct. App., December 5, 1996) (wife awarded $9 million against husband for fraudulently procuring divorce and
marital settlement agreement, and $450,000 against husbands attorney), affirmed over dissent, Vickery v. Vickery,
999 S.W.2d 342 (Tex. 1999).
182.
Another possible avenue for recovery against a spouse and a third party for economic fraud is the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. 1961-64 (Supp. 1999). Claims
under RICO in the divorce context are also scarce, but not unheard of.
302.
The strongest RICO case is Perlberger v. Perlberger, 1998 WL 76310, 1998.EPA.1313 (E.D. Pa.
February 24, 1998). In this case, a woman filed a civil RICO claim against her ex-husband, his law practice
associates, and his accountants for allegedly participating in a fraudulent scheme to conceal his true income

31

during the divorce action. According to the wife, the fraudulent scheme began in 1986 when the husband decided
to divorce the wife. He devised a scheme whereby he would initiate an extra-marital affair for the purpose of
shielding his assets and income from scrutiny during divorce. The husband, an attorney, began an affair with a
client, and purchased a home in her name. He then left his law firm and instead of using his own assets (a capital
account the former firm owed him), he used his girlfriends assets to establish a credit line for a new firm. He was
then able to argue that his new firm was not a marital asset. He also paid his girlfriend an inflated salary, and had
another attorney, Rothenberg, hold all the assets to the new firm. The court stated:
303.
Here, Plaintiffs RICO claim is based on Defendants alleged mail and wire fraud. Although the alleged
fraudulent scheme perpetrated by the Defendants may be accurately described as garden variety fraud, such a
characterization is not fatal to Plaintiffs RICO claim under the current state of the law.
304.
Defendants next argue that they have not found any cases in Pennsylvania in which civil RICO has been
used to attack a divorce decree, child support order, or alimony award. (Accountant Defs. Mot. at 3.) Although
the Court also has not found any such Pennsylvania cases, the Court has found a number of Federal cases where
courts have entertained civil RICO claims relating to family law matters. E.g., Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 506
(9th Cir. 1996); Calcasieu Marine Nat. Bank v. Grant, 943 F.2d 1453 (5th Cir. 1991). With Tabas as guidance and
with the decisions of other courts in mind, the Court will not dismiss Plaintiffs RICO claim on policy grounds.
305.
Perlberger represents a small but growing handful of cases where a spouse asserts civil RICO in the
divorce context. See Smith v. Johnson, 173 F.3d 430 (6th Cir. 1999) (unpublished table decision); DeMauro v.
DeMauro, 115 F.3d 94 (1st Cir. 1997); Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 506 (9th Cir. 1996); Calcasieu Marine National
Bank v. Grant, 943 F.2d 1453 (5th Cir. 1991); Evans v. Dale, 896 F.2d 975 (5th Cir. 1990); DuBroff v. DuBroff, 833
F.2d 557 (5th Cir. 1987); Dibbs v. Gonsalves, 921 F. Supp. 44 (D.P.R. 1996); Reynolds v. Condon, 908 F. Supp.
1494 (N.D. Iowa 1995); Streck v. Peters, 855 F. Supp. 1156 (D. Haw. 1994); Hibbard v. Benjamin, No. 90-1-361WF, 1992 WL 300838 (D. Mass. Sept. 21, 1992); Capasso v. Cigna Insurance Co., 765 F. Supp. 839 (S.D.N.Y.
1991).
183.
On or around September 4, 2013 Lawyer Ilona filed a Motion to Intervene into Janices divorce again for
willful acts that were and malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless for personal
protection from the illegal actions to date of Lawyer Ilona.
306.
184.
On or around September 11, 2013 Janice responds to Lawyer Ilonas Motion to Intervene.
307.
185.
The Divorce is never given an open hearing in the open court instead Judge Clark rules from
Chambers as all Federal Judges have. That the appeal was denied and the Supreme Court denied extra
time for a response as I was jailed and unable to respond.
308.
186.
That Les Pendens were filed on the Real Estate still owned to protect Janices interest as Ilona had sold
off many parcels illegally.
309.
187.
On or around December 24, 2013 Lawyer Ilona and Loretta Miller aka (Leah Lax Miller, Muggy Cat and
Billy Sullivan) in collusion attack Janice for being Catholic. The following is just one of many e-mails and a
blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com (by all appearance taken down while JWG was illegally jailed) which is
riddled with lies again to harm Janice and Janices children and distract Janice and all from the
TURTH. Again when Police are called they are not to take any reports I should just ignore the threats on
me and my children.

32

310.

311.
188.
The false and illegal legal fees fined against me so Ilona and the Old Boys Network could further
harm me, by attorneys who have lied in court, lied in court documents, lied to the Supreme Court of
Virginia, ex-parte communications, City of Alexandria Police Report: ignoring the law - with the help of
the Commonwealths attorney's office took the report
312.
189.
That Lawyer Ilona filed Cases in The City of Alexandria and Prince William County to have the
Lis Pendens removed using Ben DiMuro and Andrea Mosley both that would continue to lie in court
and in court documents to mislead the courts from the TRUTH using their influence on the Judges
to illegally threaten jail as shown in the Orders from both Judges and to illegally jail me for legal fees
by Judge Clark.

313.
190.
Divorce Lis Pendens Case # 1400 2193 Just a miscarriage of further Justice where the Affidavit of
Legal fees has more calls to Judges chambers than to their own client. Illegal ex-parte communications.
314.
191. Prince William County - Divorce Lis Pendens Case # 14-2185 and 14-2185 1 I was allowed by the
Judge to record the court hearing. The sheriffs on the end of the tape can be heard saying to erase it.
None of the Judges who heard this case allowed witnesss to speak nor did they have Jurisdiction due to
Bias all Orders were and are VOID even with the Judgments the lawyers were given Legal Collection
agencies have refused to enforce when they have seen the evidence of corruption.
192. A police report with the help of the Commonwealths attorney was done: and tampered with to
prevent DUE PROCESS Police Report in the City of Alexandria by JW Grenadier October 10, 2014
Notes - Case No. 14 - 142420

315.
193.
On Friday October 10, 2014 Janice Wolk Grenadier went to the court house to file a motion to have a
court appointed attorney.
316.
194.
Janice went to the court house to file my Motion for an emergency hearing - The Clerk politely
explained I needed to call Judge's chambers to set it up. I am actually by their Order of October 12, 2014
forbidden to call Judges Chambers, write to Judges Chambers etc. This is just one case where they are
allowing outrages legal fees and trying to put me in jail no on October 22, 2014.
317.
195.
I went to the Commonwealths attorneys office which even though they are attorneys they don't look into
anything that does not come to them though the police. I have called the police several times to report the
corruption and the man they had hired to harm me, along with the Leah Lax bullying. The police would come
to my house and say well we aren't allowed to write a report. That Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney

33

had ordered no one was to write a report on my complaints. So I called the police right there at the Court
House and had them come there and take the report.
318.
196.
Officer M, Vaccaro #2371 and P. Taylor #1979 his supervisor / training officer was with him. The crime
was headlined as "Criminal Corruption in the Courthouse is what you are claiming" me "YES" this report
was taken in the Clerks office. I gave them the pictures of my evidence that was stolen out of my file and the
Order that came with it, The attached documents and since my files were in the court house right there I asked
if they would like to go through them. They were not interested in doing that. Replied "This will be turned
over the to the White Collar Crime division, that this was above their job" the Case No is 14 - 142420
319.
197.
After the report they wanted me out of the Court House, They said that I did not have to leave but, it was
best for me. They insinuated I had done something to be removed that the Commonwealth Attorney's office
did not want me in the building. When I asked why and what was said they refused real comment and
admitted I had done nothing wrong.
320.
198.
The Commonwealth attorneys office has said several times they would not put me in front of the Grand
Jury to ask for a Special Grand Jury that I had to go through the Police as is in my attached documents about
the Corruption in Northern Virginia- yet it has always been the Commonwealth Attorney who blocked me
from a police report in regard to the corruption.
321.
199.
I gave them copies of documents showing criminal intend for the officers to open the case. The document
with the Box of Evidence and the Order from Judge Clark, Kemler & Dawkins is modified by the Notes that
were filed in my Statement of Facts in November of 2012

322.
watched by the FBI or that is the appearance -

Virginia is being closely

323.
Other Links:
324.
Virginia Rated 47th and 49th in Corruption - Daily Beast rated Virginia second
most Corrupt State http://www.loudountimes.com/index.php/news/article/region_survey_finds_virginia_sec
ond_most_corrupt_state987/ 325.
326.
State Integrity Gave them an F - 47th most corrupt States http://www.stateintegrity.org/virginia

327.
328.
200.
The FOIA request was completely redacted by the City Attorneys - This was in collusion with the
Commonwealth's Attorney whose suggestion it was to call the police.
329.
201.
That a Judge with Jurisdiction has never been had in this case. All Judges were improperly chosen
with or by Judge Haddock
202.
Jailing me on the pretense of legal fees that Alps Insurance said they were paying, for lawyers who had
lied in almost if not all documents submitted to the court, the affidavit of legal fees showing more calls to

34

Judges chambers than to their own clients. Most importantly we do not have debtors prisons in the
United States of America Janice was jailed illegaly on October 22, 2014 After sneaking out documents
was released early on November 14, 2015 Janice stated the Following:
330.

331.

That your actions have turned back time. Giving me less rights then a slave. Taking someone

under Title 42 US Code 1994 and Title 18 US Code 1581(a): Whoever holds or returns any person to a
condition of PEONAGE, shall be fined under this title for imprisoned not more than 20 years or both.
That on October 22, 2014 I was placed in jail for failure to pay legal fees in 30 days which is a violation
of my Thirteenth Amendment "Neither Slavery not involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a
crime where of the party shall have duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any subject to
their Jurisdiction". Furthermore the right by placing me "under" a state Peonage / Involuntary
Servitude violating the Fourth Amendment right by malicious prosecution, false imprisonment and
unconstitutional arrest. This violation of my Eight Amendment Right as to Excessive Bail which in this
case constitutes "Restitution Bail" which further shows the knowledgeable malicious intent to silence me
till the election was over on November 4th. 2014. Bias, Retaliation and Retribution to further line the
Lawyers pockets by Judge Clark.

203.

JAILING AND USING WARFARE TYPE TOUTURE October 22 Nov 12, 2015

14 days Solitaire Confinement till around 5pm on election day which is Torture

332.
What is Solitary Confinement?
In the early nineteenth century, the U.S. led the world in a
new practice of imprisoning people in solitary cells, without access to any human contact or stimulation, as a
method of rehabilitation. The results were disastrous, as prisoners suffered severe psychological harm. The
practice was all but abandoned. Over a century later, it has made an unfortunate comeback. Instead of
torturing prisoners with solitary confinement in dark and dirty underground holes, prisoners are now
subjected to solitary confinement in well-lit, sterile boxes. The psychological repercussions are similar
333.
334.
CCRs Challenges to Solitary Confinement In May 2012, the Center for Constitutional
Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit against the state of California for its use of prolonged solitary confinement in the
infamous Pelican Bay prison. Ashker, et al. v. Governor, et al., is a federal class action challenging prolonged
solitary confinement and deprivation of due process, based on the rights guaranteed under the Eighth and
Fourteenth Amendments, at Pelican Bay
In Wilkinson v. Austin, the U.S. Supreme Court
unanimously ruled in support of CCRs claims that prison officials cannot confine prisoners in
long-term solitary confinement in a super maximum prison without first giving them the opportunity to
challenge their placement.
335.
336.
Solitary Confinement is Torture The devastating psychological and physical effects of
prolonged solitary confinement are well documented by social scientists: prolonged solitary confinement causes
prisoners significant mental harm and places them at grave risk of even more devastating future psychological
harm and at times, these harms were found to be permanent or persist even after one was released from
solitary. Researchers have demonstrated that prolonged solitary confinement causes a persistent and
heightened state of anxiety and nervousness, headaches, insomnia, lethargy or chronic tiredness, nightmares,
heart palpitations, fear of impending nervous breakdowns and higher rates of hypertension and early
morbidity. Other documented effects include obsessive ruminations, confused thought processes, an
oversensitivity to stimuli, irrational anger, social withdrawal, hallucinations, violent fantasies, emotional
flatness, mood swings, chronic depression, feelings of overall deterioration, as well as suicidal ideation.
337.
338.
Exposure to such life-shattering conditions clearly constitutes cruel and unusual
punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Further, the brutal
use of solitary has been condemned as torture by the international community. Juan Mendez,

35

the United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment, concluded that even 15 days in solitary confinement constitutes torture or
cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and 15 days is the limit after which irreversible harmful
psychological effects can occur. Other independent human rights bodies at the UN have also expressed concern
about Pelican Bay prison and the overall use of solitary in U.S. prisons. However, many prisoners in the United
States have been isolated for far longer than just 15 days I was only a few hours short of 15 days

339.

Denied phone calls till 10 pm on 1st day


Woken up every 2 hours at night
Not allowed out of cell till 2 or 3 am for one hour, left in cell for over 24 hours limit.
When tried to make phone calls the calls through system did not work and could not get
help
Sat down and told I had less rights than someone who murdered someone by City
employee Jonathan Teumer and Lt Rea for sneaking out the documents that got me
out of jail early. The actions were deliberate and evil to intimidate me further. That
Mayor Euille was given such documents as well as all other State officials
Denied access to Priest and when I did see him and asked for my cross or rosary He
explained he had been told by Lt. Rea it would have to be if she deemed it appropriate
for me to have. He did not understand or had never seen such a situation where it went
through a Sheriff like Lt. Rea. This action was pure evil.
No Advocate
Denied mail returned to sender saying I was not there my mail I did received had
been opened I requested a copy of the court order and was denied
Denied phone calls to lawyers
Stripped searched patted down men watching me shower
I was lied to consistently by the Sheriffs especially Lt Rea and Capt. Williams
Moved around to try and disorient me and show control they had
The Magistrate when finally I was allowed in front of him warned me If I did not stop this
it would only get worse for me? Which I took as a personal threat on my life and on my
childrens lives Which I took as a personal threat on my life and on my childrens
lives Especially with the knowledge of at least 5 known hits in the City of Alexandria
and the Supreme Court Justice Cynthia Kinser being forced to retire early Gift to the
Democrats letting Fund Raiser Michael Gardner out of jail who had by DNA results
found guilty of molesting young girls in McLean only to turn around and try to hire one
of those hit men to kill the girls Do it the Virginia Way as Senator Mark Warner would
say in his Campaign
Denied appropriate forms for filing of complaints and requests
All Avery v. Johnson rights denied
Denied my documents on my day of court, prior to going to court.
Judge Clark in Court stated Ms. Grenadier I have no choice but to release you and then
turned to Lawyer Michael Weiser and stated I am sooooo very sorry I can not collect
your legal fees for you you will need to do a judgment against her for collection As
Lawyer Ben DiMuro et al were no shows after lying in court, lying in court documents et
al.
The head Sheriff assured me I would be released within 2 hours of getting back to the
jail I was not released till after 8 pm over 8 hours from getting back from the Court.
The apparent reason was to further try to intimidate me and further the mental anguish
of false imprisonment and to try and enforce the EVIL POWER they believe they have in
controlling a single mom who told the TRUTH, and did not spinelessly walk away from
the Old Boys Network.

36

340.
204. That the Plaintiffs Orders they claim to be judgments are VOID that not one Judge from
September of 2007 or before have had Jurisdiction and ruled by the law. That Janice a poor person
has been denied even her basic rights to Due Process. That the collusion and the harm that the
Plaintiffs have caused was done willfully with knowledgably intend to harm Janice and her girls for
being Catholic and no longer party to the Old Boys Network as she was told many occasions and
listed here in this Counter Complaint Cross Complaint. That the State and Federal law , the
Professional Code of Ethics is very clear on Judicial Misconduct and when a Judge Does Not have
Jurisdiction, that is Treason on the Courts, Fraud on the Courts what the Judges have done since
on or around September of 2007.
341.

342.

CLAIMS

343.
Claim 1
344. Breach of Contract Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Breach of
Contractual Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
205. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through
206 of this Complaint
206. By virtue of the facts stated above, Plaintiffs have violated their contractual duty of good faith
and fair dealing. Janice in the past has paid fees to these courts and not received Due Process.
207. The above Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs representatives breached their contractual duty of good faith
and fair dealing when Judges ruled in Favoritism and Cronyism. When Judges did not have
Jurisdiction and chose friends/other Judges who would not follow the rules but would rules as told.
208. That the above Plaintiffs Breach of Contract includes not limited to their involvement being
disingenuous / Lying in documents filed with the courts and Orders. The documents will speak for
themselves that Plaintiffs was aware of these breaches as lawyers and Judges.
209. Janice through implied covenant of good faith and Fair Dealing continued to follow the Rules of
the Courts.
210. The Plaintiffs flagrantly violated their Fiduciary responsibility to the Judicial System and
Janice to deal in Good Faith while Janice continued to deal in Good Faith. The actions will be
proven factually by Orders, Letters, Documents filed in the court and other. That the constitutional
Right of Due Process has been denied time and time again.
345.
346.
Claim 2
347. Violation Title 42 1983 Civil Rights Statue
348. Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245
211. Janice incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through
211 of this Complaint
212. Defendants used unfair/unconscionable means to try and intimated and scare Janice and her girls
They have acted as the Klu Klux Klan fashion under the name Old Boys Network would have in
the past. Janice is aware that Janice must show that Janice can prove each element of alleged facts in
her claims. That to seek relief for the violation of a persons Federal and Constitution rights under
Title 42 1983 it allows Janice to her rights contained in the United States Constitution as defined
by Federal Law.
213. Janice has been discriminated against for being Catholic That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted
18 USC 245 prevents discrimination due to Religion That this is a Hate Crime and Hate crime laws
37

are colorblind Fact the case which the Supreme Court upheld hate crimes of the First amendment
attach, Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476(1993) involved a white victim.
214. Janice has been discriminated against for being black balled by the Old Boys Network / Judicial
Community due to her x-husband being the son of the late Judge Albert Grenadier whom was the
Husband to Ilona a lawyer who has also intervened into Janices Divorce. That the discrimination
and segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is considered
by others inferior to the other.
349.
Claim 3
350.
Consumer Protection Act, Mail Fraud
215. Janice incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
351.
Paragraphs 1 through 214 of this Complaint.
216.
The State of Virginia was paid for serves in the Court that were denied Janice because she was
Catholic. That the discrimination and segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a
member of one that is considered by others inferior to the other.
217. That when documents that were properly put into the record and Judges Kemler, Clark and
Dawkins removed them from the record they used the United States Mail service for Fraud on the
Court.
352.
Claim 4
353.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
354.
Unjust Enrichment/Constructive Trust
218. Janice incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
355.
Paragraphs 1 through 217 of this Complaint
219. That the State of Virginia and the Federal Government had a Fiduciary Duty to insure the rights
and safety of Janice in the and through the Court system. Janice has for ever been harmed by the
false statements which are considered defamatory that Plaintiff has THE TRUTH which is
an absolute defense . That the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect
Freedom of the press. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan radically changed the nature
of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you needed to prove that the information was wholly and
patently false or that it was published with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not
220. That Lawyer Ilona has with the Help of the Judiciary, the Government and Elected Officials
reaped in millions of illegal Real Estate and other funds, by the thefts through her law firm and
acting as an attorney for Janice Wolk Grenadier and Sonia Grenadier Trust.
356.
Claim 5
357.
Injunctive / Declaratory Relief
221. Janice incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
358.
Paragraphs 1 through 220 of this Complaint
222. That Janice now needs to pray this court grants temporary or permanent injunctive relief as
Janice reputation has been harmed for life. That Janice as anyone else in the United States should
have easy and fair access to the courts. That no one should be denied access and fair treatment due
to race, age, sexual orientation.
223. To warrant preliminary injunctive relief, the moving party must show

38

A. Substantial likelihood of success on the merits Janice believes she has provided this court
with the information needed to outline the actions of both Plaintiffs and the Criminal actions of
all the Plaintiffs along with documentation that should without doubt assure this court
B. That she would suffer irreparable injury if the injunction were not granted Janice has a
child friendly product that has been for ever harmed by the loss of Social Media, the blog
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com the e-mails that were created by or from the hacking of Janices
computer that state the following AGAIN JANICE HAS NEVER SAID THIS! Janice WILL
PROVE These e-mails to BE THE FRIVOLOUS imaginative of Plaintiffs to permanently harm
Janice. Just the name of the blog itself is offensive and violates Janices Constitutional
rights and is libel and deformation of character of Janice jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com
359.
Thursday, January 9, 2014
360.
Janice Wolk Grenadier wishes death on Loretta Lax Miller's son who is going in for
surgery
361.
If you want to read what sick piece of garbage Janice Wolk Grenadier aka Granny Panties is, you
should read the newest email sent to us by her.
-----Original Message----From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234< leahlax1234@aol.com>
Sent: Wed , Jan 8, 2014 1:40 pm
Subject: I hope your son DIES
I hope your son dies during his surgery tomorrow! It will be one less JEW BOY out there. He should
have died at childbirth. You can bury your son and then die after!
One of the many e-mails through hacking of
Janices computer by all appearance Ilona and
others or her gang created

Warmly,
JW Grenadier

What kind of sick piece of garbage does that? What kind of sick, evil, and sadistic person would tell a
mother that they hope her kid dies during surgery? This shows what kind of sick, sadistic evil piece of
filth that Janice Wolk Grenadier is and should be put away for her sick actions. Who would wish a
person death? Janice Wolk Grenadier would.
We here at Muggy Cat want to wish your son a healthy recovery on his surgery Ms. Lax Miller. We are
so sorry you are being harassed by that sick woman.
362. Posted by muggy cat at 11:21 AM
363. Monday, January 6, 2014
364.
This explains it's self
365.
-----Original Message----From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>
Sent: Tue , Jan 7, 2014 12:15 am
Subject: Re: Had it with you!
366.
Look you Jew Bastard I had it with you and now you are going to pay.
39

367.
Warmly,
368.
JW Grenadier
369.

Sunday, January 5, 2014

370.
Is this the writing of a crazy woman
371.
-----Original Message----From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234 <leahlax1234@aol.com>
Sent: Sun , Jan 5, 2014 9:45 pm
Subject: YOU FUCKING JEWS
You refuse to take my side. I wrote to you about my problems and you called me names
"Me and My family had nothing to do with your girls because you raised them Catholic" by - Jewish
attorney Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman - of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet & Kiesler
Israel wants the United States of America to defend them - yet some of the most powerful Jews in the
Washington DC area - are discriminating against Catholics, Corrupting the Judicial System, and
Cheating the IRS. - My personal opinion is we need to be friends with Israel - But, they have to have the
same respect for other religions - and for the Laws and the Rules of the Supreme Courts and the United
States of America's Constitution - Very powerful Jews in the DC area Ilona Ely Freedman Heckman and
Yoav Katz are using their money and power to buy their war around the Judicial System and cheat the
IRS! you can read more at www.valaw2010.blogspot.com
Now you tell Ilona to give me my money.
No one is going to believe you. They will believe me because I tell the TRUTH! and you Jews all lie.
Jews like you belong in your graves. I deserve that money!
I have a gun and I know how to use it!
When Hillary gets into office, I am going to make sure all of you FUCKING JEWS are put into
concentration camps to die. I support Hillary and she hates you FUCKING JEWS!
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
372.
This letter came to us here at Muggy Cat at 9:45 PM EST. Doesn't this show the kind of
obsession that Janice Wolk Grenadier has against anyone that doesn't agree with her. What is next? Is
she going to go after our families? However she went after her family or should we say ex-family who
disowned her. We have posted previous letters that Janice Wolk Grenadier had sent to her family in
previous blog posts.
Now here is something really funny and intersting about Janice Wolk Grenadier. Well actually a few
funny things. Today she was seen naked in her back yard building an ice alter to her Dark Lord Satan.
She was doing this in the freezing rain. The scary part was she had icicles hanging from her oversized
nipples and from her pubic hair. She then took a large icicle and began to masterbate with it until it
melted.
A neighbor had seen Janice Wolk Grenadier walking out of a sex shop Friday night with a large bag
filled with sex toys and two very large women who looked like Amazons. They were seen driving to a
gay bar in which Janice and the two women frequent and have pajama parties afterwards. She left
Saturday morning with her hair disarray and a smile on her face. A dog collar could be seen around her
neck and welts on her arms and legs. We don't think she is the dominant one in this relationship. Family
services should have taken her kids away from her years ago. She neglected them for her sexual
pleasures and alcohol addiction.
40

Janice Wolk Grenadier adores her Fuher Adolf Hitler who was also bi-sexual. Janice Wolk Grenadier has
been seen wearing a painted on mustache just like her idol and walking around wearing a Swasticka on

her rare selfie of Janice Wolk Grenadier


373.
This classless woman should be put away in a padded cell so she can't hurt anyone else.
Someone please call the authorities to have her institutionalized for her safety and for the safety of
others. Remember she carries a gun!
374.

Sunday, January 5, 2014

375.

Janice Wolk Grenadier supports the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton

376.
Not only is Janice Wolk Grenadier a traitor to the American people by being a card carrying
Commie Pinko but she is also supporting the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton. Yes we said it
here, Anti Christs meaning plural. Why is Janice doing this? Because they are not only going to let her
keep her hairy vag but they are going to give her the chance to grow a penis as well. Well penises. Yes,
Janice Wolk Grenadier will have 6 penises all over her body including one over her vagina. The other 5
will be as so: one in the palm of each hand, one on the bootom of each foot and one right where a tramp
stamp would be on her back. That way when Janice Wolk Grenadier dies, she can go to Allah's heaven
and have her 72 virgins. These 72 virgins will be a mix of males and females that she can rape with all
of her penises and then the next morning at sun up they become virgins again. We have figured it out
that the fetal body of little Joshua that Janice keeps in the basement of her home is going to be the vessel
for the Dark Lord Satan himself to resurrect in a human body to carry out the apocolypse. That way,
Janie Wolk Grenadier is guaranteed her 6 penises.
Proof she supports the Anti Christ is in her letters she has posted and her other posts of Hillary's and
Obama's support defending both on everything Loretta Lax Miller fought against including the
ObamaCare and Islamic Terrorism which Obama and Hillary support. Janice is for the destruction of the
Catholic Church's values of having Nuns despense birthcontroll pills. Janice supports this by supporting
Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Husein Obama. Everything Obama stands for is to destroy
American Family Values and Janice has no values and worships Satan.
We at Muggy Cat take the religious stand that Janice is the Anti Christ and does not beleive in God and
the wonders God has done on this Earth. Maybe Janice should move to sin city Las Vegas and sell her
soul as well as her fugly body on the strip since she is whoring for Satan.
-----Original Message----From: JWG <jwgrenadier3@aol.com>
To: muggycatscreams <muggycatscreams@aol.com>; leahlax1234 <leahlax1234@aol.com>
Sent: Wed , Jan 1, 2014 10:45 am
Subject: Re: i agree with you
You FUCKEN JEWS!!!!!! ALL OF YOU . DICK FARREL JOSH COHEN, LEAH LAX AKA
41

LORETTA LAX MILLER AND THE REST OF YOU FUCKEN 30 JEWS. Hitler was right! Ya'll
deserve to die! YOU SHOULD BE PLACED IN A BIG OVEN.
Warmly,
JW Grenadier
We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to
protest her anti-American pro-Satan values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk
Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't forget to bring Holy Water from your
church to purify and sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of the vessel of
Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her lack of soul but do not look her straight in the eyes
or you will be turned to stone.
377.
Posted by muggy cat at 8:48 AM
378.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook Labels: CIA, FBI, Hillary Rodman
Clinton, Janice Wolk Grenadier, KGB, leah lax, MI5, MI6, My Pillow Pack, Obama, virginia law 2010
379.
That the above is just 3 pages out of almost 200 printed out pages of slander and Libel of
Janice by Plaintiffs. Janice felt the e-mails that bear her name THAT JANICE DID NOT WRITE
should hold a lot of wait in what Janice will be able to prove.
C. That an injunction would not substantially injure other interested parties and This blog has
hurt no one but Janice and her ability to market and advertise a Child Friendly product. This
blog and other actions were deliberate willful acts that are and were malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless. That the hacking and killing of Janices
computers was malicious and has also prevented Janice the right to market her product.
D. That the public interest would be furthered by the injunction the HATE CRIME OF THIS
is sinful and that this court cannot see that becomes questionable to the rational of fairness. That
the sexual and in appropriate photos of Hillary Clinton and Michele Obama in there blogs The
racist and religious overtures of HATE BY DEFENDENTS is so obvious that to have to go any
further would show Bias by this court and any one of normal moral value. . Fairness of course
requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of law has always
endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136
(1955) Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil rights decision of the United
States Supreme Court against discrimination. Which includes being discriminated because the
Judges, lawyers, elected officials and government employees have decided you are not a part of
or one of them.
380.

Claim 6
381.

382.
224.
383.

Common Law Fraud12 U.S.C 1972


Janice incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 223 of this Complaint.
42

225. On several occasions Janice asked the courts to review and asked for a Special Grand Jury to
look into the allocations of misconduct. Janice was to go in front of the Grand Jury with her
witnesss But, instead was kidnapped in a different Court Room and Grand Jury was dismissed
prior to Janice and her witnesss being allowed into ask for the Special Grand Jury..
226. That Janice Submitted documents into this Court and the Virginia Circuit Court of the City of
Alexandria properly and by law to have the documents mailed back so this court and the Circuit
Court of City of Alexandria could ignore the criminal acts and actions of Lawyer Ilona Grenadier.
384.
Claim 7
385.
386.
Negligence the negligent infliction of emotional distress; the intentional infliction of
emotional distress Violations of Code of Professional Conduct & the Judicial Cannons
227. Janice incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
387.
Paragraphs 1 through 226 of this Complaint
228. The Plaintiffs had a legal duty to use reasonable care in statements posted on the internet about
Janice. They did not do this. They have posted several lies about Janice and others. They have
done this willfully and with knowledgeable intend to ruin Janices reputation and should be held
financially and legally responsible for their actions.
229. The Plaintiffs malicious actions caused great emotional distress to Janice. By the
Commonwealth Attorneys orders of the City of Alexandria police to never take a complaint from
Janice? Janice has been harmed by the false statements which are considered defamatory that
Janice has THE TRUTH which is an absolute defense . That the First Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution was designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v.
Sullivan radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you needed to prove
that the information was wholly and patently false or that it was published with reckless disregard
of whether it was false or not. Janice has been put into an unfair and dangerous position with little
ability to protect herself and her girls.
388.
230. The actions of the actors to cause this emotional distress were malicious, violent, oppressive,
fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless.
389.
390.
231. When the Judges and Lawyers Self Policing did not in any way stop or correct their errors
they committed Fraud on the court. Violating That all ORDERS ARE VOID Due to the Judges lack of
Jurisdiction. VA Code 17.105 (b) and VA Code 8.01-428. Setting aside default judgments; clerical mistakes;
independent actions to relieve party from judgment or proceedings; grounds and time limitations.
391.
A. Default judgments and decrees pro confesso; summary procedure. - Upon
motion of the plaintiff or judgment debtor and after reasonable notice to the
opposite party, his attorney of record or other agent, the court may set aside a
judgment by default or a decree pro confesso upon the following grounds: (i)
fraud on the court, (ii) a void judgment, (iii) on proof of an accord and
satisfaction, or (iv) on proof that the defendant was, at the time of service of
process or entry of judgment, a person in the military service of the United
States for purposes of 50 U.S.C. app. 502. Such motion on the ground of fraud
on the court shall be made within two years from the date of the judgment or
decr

392.

Claim 8
43

393.

Constructive Fraud

232.
394.

Janice incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in


Paragraphs 1 through 231 of this Complaint
233.
The Plaintiffs were deceptive of material misrepresentations of past and existing facts
and remained silent when a duty to speak existed.
234.
The Plaintiffs actions were Arbitrary and Capricious absence of a rational connection
between the facts found and the choices made, made choices that were not in accordance with
the law.
395.

Claim 9

396.

Civil Conspiracy
235.

Janice incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in


397.
Paragraphs 1 through 234 of this Complaint
236.
The Collusion of the Plaintiffs actions show collusion to harm Janice and her girls from
and was done with malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless
intentions.
237.
Plaintiffs Civil Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations
abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress,
238.
Civil conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood with jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com that
Janice has a protected characteristic which will be proven as to why Janice was sought out by
Plaintiff and that factor is why Janice was targeted by Plaintiffs
239.
Plaintiffs were in collusion of civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict emotional distress.
398.
399. Claim 10
400. The Four Basic Freedoms Guaranteed by the Bill of Rights
240.
Janice incorporates herein by reference all of the allegations contained in
401.
Paragraphs 1 through 238 of this Complaint
241.
Janice will prove a violation of Plaintiffs Bill of Rights the Four Basic freedoms are
being Violated
402.
The Four Freedoms
403.
1. Freedom of
405.
3. Freedom
speech
from want
404.
2.
406.
4.
Freedom of worship
Freedom from fear

44

407.
408.
Janice will show the actions of the Plaintiffs were actions that were willful acts were malicious,
violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless That the plaintiffs were acting under the
color of State and Federal law. That the Constitutional Rights of due process are factual allegations that
will be proven through documents, letters, e-mails and actions of plaintiffs.
242.

That when Janice was illegally jailed and warfare torture used all of her Constitutional
rights under Avery vs. Johnson were violated. October 22, 2014 November 12, 2014

243. Janice is poor and is unrepresented. Janice Notices this Court of Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106,
1110 (10th Cir. 1991), where the Court stated that;

409. A Pro Se litigants pleading are to be construed liberally and to a less stringent standard
than formal pleadings drafted by lawyersIf a Court can reasonably read the pleadings to state
a valid claim on which Plaintiff could prevail, it should do so despite the Plaintiffs failure to
site proper legal authority, his confusion of various legal theories, his poor syntax and sentence
construction or his unfamiliarity with pleading requirements (Citation Omitted). See also
Riley v. Greene, 149 F. Supp. 2d 1256 (D. Colo. 2001)
244.

Pleadings filed by unrepresented litigants shall not be held to the same standard as
lawyers and/or attorneys at law (distinct definitions); and whose motions, pleadings and all
papers may only be judged by their substance and not their form. See: Haines v. Kerner;
Platsky v. CIA; Anastasoff v. United States (emphasis in bold):

410. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519-421. Unrepresented litigants are held to less stringent
pleading standards than admitted or licensed bar attorneys. Regardless of the deficiencies in
their pleadings, unrepresented litigants are entitled to the opportunity to submit evidence in
support of their claims.
411.
412.
Platsky v. C.I.A., 953 f.2d. 25. Court errs if court dismisses the unrepresented litigant
without instruction of how pleadings are deficient and how to repair pleadings.
413.
414.
Anastasoff v. United States, 223 F.3d 898 (8th Cir. 2000). Litigants' [substantive]
constitutional [guaranteed] rights [not confused with privileges] are violated when courts depart
from precedent where parties are similarly situated.
415.
245.
Janice Notices this court of Article IV Sec 1 of the National Constitution.
416. Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and
judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe
the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect
thereof.
417.
CONCLUSION

246.
418.

Janice incorporates by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 245 above

WHEREFORE Defendant Janice Wolk Grenadier in her Counter Claim and Cross Complaint

demands $100,000,000.00 (One Hundred Million Dollars) and any other this court finds appropriate or
the Jury for the Libel, Slander loss of wages and patent. That Janice demands that a Special Grand Jury

be put into place to investigate all Criminal Acts and Actors of the Judiciary, the Government and
Elected Officials. That Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadiers and David Grenadiers Complaint be
dismissed and the suit of the Counter Claim be allowed to move forward with a Trial by Jury for the
cases as stated from the City of Alexandria Court and the Prince William County Court. That Janice has
given the Evidence that shows the Judges did not have Jurisdictions due to Fraud on the Court, that
all Judges in the Circuit Court was doing favor to either Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman, Ben
DiMuro, or Judge Donald Kent or Judge Donald Haddock who chose all the Judges in the Circuit Court
of Alexandria before and after in 2008 declaring that Janice Wolk Grenadier would never get a fair trial
and that he and others LOVED ILONA.
247.

That Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman


believes she can get away with the above. Then bring to this court asking for a right to sell
Janices home is to help in the cover up by all the others. That making Janice homeless is what
she wants to do. That Ilona and David believe because of being the son of the late Judge Albert
Grenadier and Ilona believes being his widow they are above the law, which the acts and actions
of the Judges you can presume that they are. That so many have worked in collusion these
ORDERS were done and Janice jailed in a Self Policing Profession shows arrogance beyond
no other. Where the attempted Murder for Hire, or trying to push Janice into Suicide has failed

they try to further the illegal acts and actions through the courts.
248.
Where we go back to is where we started in this Cross Complaint: In 1967, Supreme
Court Justice William O. Douglas posed the following inquiry: What about the judge who
conspires with local law enforcement officers to railroad a dissenter? What about the judge
who knowingly turns a trial into a kangaroo court? Or one who knowingly flouts the
Constitution in order to obtain a conviction? [Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 566-67
(1967)].

Those very issues raised by Justice Douglas over 40 years ago are now surfacing by

way of this lawsuit, exposing the two original Plaintiffs and others such actors while serving as
an example to others who might be intentionally abusing the protected rights of self-represented
litigants.
249.
The Basic Liberty of Due Process has been violated. The basic liberty that our Flag
stands for and here is where the standard of Liberty is set for the rest of the World. It is under
the Oath that each Judge has taken that this heavy burden lies on your shoulders to protect the
Rights of each and every American Citizen. That the Appearance of Justice is just as
important as Justice itself.
250.
Janice is going to be requesting a Special Grand Jury to be immediately put into action to
investigate the appearance of these and other criminal. The Special Grand Jury is due to the
peculiar nature and lack of federal and state oversight. The appearance is the Judiciary, the
Government and Elected Officials in policing themselves has given them virtually unlimited
authority, discretion, and few reviewable questions of law for appeal. There is little to no
federal oversight through civil rights actions. Many federal courts have abstained from

accepting even when they assert violations of federal civil rights laws, and state actors regularly
assert immunities under the Eleventh Amendment or personal immunities for judicial or quasijudicial activities. That the entire industry has set its own best practices to incorporate fraud
and extortion as relevant standard of care. The industry regards itself as untouchable by its
own vulnerable client base.
251.
The result of this unusual absence of checks and balances has become a perfect storm
of unchecked power, absence of meaningful oversight, and financially-motivated professionals
who operate the systemlawyers, city/ county-level bureaucrats, none of whom are open to
input from litigants. Litigants encounter the system as a revolving door process with short term
goals. There is no longer term litigant-side input to protect the legal and ethical integrity of
the processes which deployed and policed by the system operators themselves. The resulting
exploitation ruins the American Citizen and there families while enriching attorneys,
governments, elected officials and judges who administer the processes they, and they alone,
created.
252.
That the acts and actions were knowledgeable, willful acts malicious, violent, oppressive,
fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless were done with an evil attempt to silence me first from
collecting money and property (Real Estate) that is and was rightfully mine, from Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman active member of the Old Boys Network, then
to silence me from exposing what was being done to me so that Senator Mark Warner could and
would be re-elected. The acts and actions began on February 14, 1986, and became obvious to
the inclusion of those below in September of 2007 and continue today. That I Janice have a
claim for these criminal and civil acts damages due me are Exemplary / Punitive,
Compensatory, Consequential, Normal, Treble, Liquidated and Special Damages.
419.

That a strong message needs to be sent to these Lawyers, Judges that they will be held

accountable for their actions.


420.
Jury Trial
421.
Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of paragraphs 3 through 252 above
422.
Defendant demands a Jury Trial, pursuant to the Seventh Amendment to the United States
Constitution. Along with the hearing to be filmed by a Camera man of the choosing of Defendant
Janice.
423.
424.
I, Janice Wolk Grenadier, am the Defendant in this action. I personally set forth the
allegations of fact in this Answer and Counter Claim Cross Complaint, and I hereby declare under
penalty of perjury that each of said allegations is true and correct.
425.
426.
Date: October 12, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
427.
/S/_____________________________
428.
Janice Wolk Grenadier
429.
15 West Spring Street
430.
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
431.
Telephone (202) 368-7178
432.
Email jwgrenadier@gmail.com
433.
434.
Attached List of Exhibits & Certificate of Service