Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Different phases of the policy process require different data collection methodologies - Legal and policy
input indicators may just require desk-based analysis of documents. Key tools for assessing policy
implementation characteristics and outputs include administrative data, surveys of expert opinion, surveys of
users, and participatory evaluation and action research. Large sample surveys can be relevant for some
outputs such as possession of tenure documentation. Outcomes and impacts, by contrast, can usually only be
assessed though methods that gather information from affected people: censuses, household surveys and
small surveys, crowd-sourcing and action-research.
Different monitoring contexts require a focus on different policy phases - Inputs and outputs (in so far as
administrative data can be used) may thus be relatively easy to assess. Assessing outcomes can be more
expensive. But for a national policy evaluation process it can be essential to assess outcomes to determine if
policy itself is appropriate. For global contexts such as the MDGs, it can be essential to assess whether policy
goals (outcomes, impacts) are being achieved. However, it is also essential for national policy processes to
monitor whether policy is being implemented as intended, by assessing implementation process
characteristics and outputs.
Page 1
2 Categorical framework
Dimension 2: Different land governance processes
The land governance process involves different governance services and programmes. It can also be seen as
including activities of community-level institutions such as customary institutions, and also household-level
decision-making (something that is very important from a gender perspective). Different indicators are often
appropriate to different elements of land governance. Figure 1 illustrates the concept of different land
governance processes, drawing closely from the VGGT on categories of government services and transfers.
The list of main indicator topics is given in Table 2 below.
Figure 1: Land governance phases and processes
Page 2
2 Categorical framework
Dimension 3: Different parameters for evaluating land governance
characteristics and outputs
Process characteristics There are a wide range of parameters that can be used to describe how land
policy is being implemented, of what any land governance process is like. In relation to policy implementation,
many key characteristics can be summarized in terms of constraints faced by users or by those charged with
implementation. These include:
- Cost constraints fees (formal and informal), legal and survey costs, time, travel, budget requirements.
- Procedural and cultural barriers required evidence of tenure, procedures for joint registration, cultural
acceptance of women as tenure holders.
- Capacity constraints requirements in terms of literacy, language, understanding of rights and procedures.
- Information constraints accessibility of government records, notification of changes, information for
effective participation.
- Accountability influence of vested interests, means of complaint and redress, participation in decisionmaking.
Very many indicators also address whether best practice in different contexts is followed in order to counter
these constraints. For example: Is a clear schedule of fees for different services publicly accessible (LGAF
19i)? Is legal aid provided to potential evictees (LIFI 3.2)?
Process outputs Key outputs include tenure records created, tenure documents conferred, planning
decisions made and enforced, building permits issued, disputes resolved, large-scale leasehold contracts
negotiated and enforced, land consolidated, readjusted, restituted or redistributed, land expropriated,
compensation paid and households resettled. In evaluating these outputs there are a number of key crosscutting considerations:
- Coverage by land area, by population, and thereof by gender, ethnicity, income group, etc..
- Bias in adjudication, planning decisions and land allocation, by gender, ethnicity, income group, etc..
- Accuracy of tenure records, maps, valuations.
- Adequacy of compensation, of land restituted or distributed, of spatial development plans
Page 3
2 Categorical framework
Indicator topics, relationship to VGGT and F&G
In this publication, indicators have been categorized first by policy phase, then by main indicator topic. Under
inputs, outcomes and impacts, main topics and sub-topics have been selected based on the focus of the
indicators catalogued. Potential topics and sub-topics not found to be represented by any indicators have been
excluded. Under processes, main topics have been selected based on Chapters 12 to 21 of the VGGT, with
reference also to LGAF thematic areas. Process sub-topics have then been selected based on the focus of
the indicators catalogued. Many process characteristic and output parameters are represented under these
process subtopics. However, potential sub-topics have only been included where they are represented by
indicators.
Table 2 lists the main indicator topics used. Indicative references from important corresponding parts of the
VGGT and F&G are also given.
Table 2: Main indicator topics, relationship to VGGT and F&G
Page 4
3 Data sources
Land
governance
indicators
database
DRAFT
10 years
Enumeration of
entire national
population
Basic
demographic,
social and
economic and
housing
indicators.
Page 1
Methodology
Comments
Reference
3 Data sources
FAO/National World
Census of
statistics
Agriculture
agencies
WCA
140 countries
(2010 round)
10 years
Enumeration/sampl
ing of all
agricultural holding
in a country
Basic indicators
on land tenure,
use, tenure,
crops, livestock,
etc..
Page 2
http://www.fao.org/econ
omic/ess/ess-wca/en/;
http://www.fao.org/econ
omic/the-statisticsdivision-ess/worldcensus-ofagriculture/worldprogramme-for-thecensus-of-agriculture2010/en/
3 Data sources
National-level
sample
surveys
World Bank
Living
LSMS
Standards
Measureme
nt Surveys
(incl.
Integrated
Surveys on
Agriculture)
29 countries
(1995-2011)
Page 3
http://econ.worldbank.or
g/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/
EXTDEC/EXTRESEAR
CH/EXTLSMS/0,,menu
PK:3359053~pagePK:6
4168427~piPK:641684
35~theSitePK:3358997,
00.html;
http://web.worldbank.or
g/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/
EXTDEC/EXTRESEAR
CH/EXTLSMS/EXTSUR
AGRI/0,,menuPK:7420
268~pagePK:64168427
~piPK:64168435~theSit
ePK:7420261,00.html
3 Data sources
UNICEF
Multiple
Indicator
Cluster
Survey
USAID
Demographi DHS
c and
Health
Surveys
MICS
52 countries
(MICS4)
3 years
(prev. 5)
34 countries
(DHS VI)
5 years
(now 3?)
Page 4
http://www.measuredhs.
com/What-WeDo/SurveyTypes/DHS.cfm;
http://www.measuredhs.
com/publications/public
ation-cr6-comparativereports.cfm
3 Data sources
National
statistics
agencies
National
household
and
agriculture
surveys
National household
surveys
implemented
outside the scope
of LSMS, DHS and
MICS.
Often closely
comparable to
LSMS or
DHS/MICS
surveys.
Page 5
3 Data sources
UN-HABITAT Urban
Iniquities
Survey
Landesa,
Renmin Uni.,
Michigan St.
Uni.
UIS
Piloted in
several cities
n/a
City-wide
household survey
containing
household, women
and community
questionnaires.
Includes
questions on
tenure
documentation
and perception of
tenure security.
An independent
Land governance
household survey. outputs,
outcomes and
impacts.
Page 6
http://www.landesa.org/
our-research-countriesand-regions/china/;
http://www.landesa.org/
wpcontent/uploads/2011/0
1/2007_01_NYU17ProvSurvey.pdf
3 Data sources
Global
surveys
World
Bank/IFC
Doing
Business
DB
185 countries
Annual
Global expert
survey ease of
doing business.
Transparency Global
International Corruption
Barometer
GCB
107 countries
(2013)
Annual or
biannual
Global opinion
survey
WEF
EOS
Global
Annual
Business opinion
survey
Executive
Opinion
Survey
The registering
property
indicators
focuses on the
costs faced by a
domestic firms is
registering a
commercial real
estate transfer.
Corruption in
different sectors.
One indicator on
property rights,
including over
financial assets.
Page 7
http://www.doingbusine
ss.org/
http://www.transparency
.org/research/gcb/
https://wefsurvey.org/in
dex.php?sid=28226&int
ro=0
3 Data sources
Crowdsourcing
initiatives
CDE, CIRAD, Land Matrix Land Matrix Global
GIGA, GIZ,
ILC
n/a
An initiative to
gather and verify
information on
large-scale land
acquisitions,
including through
crown-sourcing.
Large-scale land
acquisitions
Page 8
http://www.landmatrix.or
g/;
http://www.tandfonline.c
om/doi/pdf/10.1080/030
66150.2013.803071
3 Data sources
Expert
assessment
frameworks
(may also
include use of
secondary
data and key
informant
interviews)
LGAF
World Bank
Land
Governance
Assessment
Framework
OECD
Social
SIGI
Institutions
and Gender
Index
17 completed, No regular
18 in process or schedule,
but some
starting
assessment
s being
repeated
after 3-4
years
A framework for
national level,
comprehensive
policy evaluation
100+ countries
Includes
indicators on
inheritance (not
just land) and
land ownership
rights.
http://genderindex.org/
Expert legal assessment, referring A source of data of legal gender
to traditional and religious law as discrimination and a methodology that
could inform other legal analysis
well as formal law.
indicators.
3 years
(2009,
2012)
Page 9
3 Data sources
Legal and LIFI
UN
HABITAT/GLT Institutional
Framework
N
Index
Piloted in
several cities
No fixed
schedule
An qualitative
evaluation
framework
Legal and
Expert legal analysis and
institutional
evaluation of institutional factors.
issues connected
with tenure
security
IFAD
Performanc PBAS
e-Based
Allocation
System
Global
Annual
An expert
evaluation system
that is used for
fund allocation.
One section of
secure access to
land focuses on
legal protections,
documentation,
land markets and
common property
regulation.
http://www.ifad.org/oper
ations/pbas/;
http://www.gaportal.org/
resources/detail/ifadland-tenure-indicators;
http://www.ifad.org/even
ts/legal/doc/scoring.pdf
World Bank
Country
CPIA
Policy
Institutional
Assessment
s
Global
Annual
A scoring system
used for fund
allocation.
Habitat for
Humanity
Global
Housing
Indicators
GHI
No fixed
Results
published for 19 schedule
cities
Page 10
3 Data sources
CIPE/IRPF
Internationa IPMS
l Property
Markets
Scorecard
No fixed
Results
published for 15 schedule
countries
A rapid expert
assessment tool
with a broadly antiregulatory
approach
CEPII
Institutional IPD
Profiles
Database
Bertelsman BTI
n
Transformat
ion Index
143 countries
3 years
Wide-ranging
One indicator on
governance index. property rights.
128 countries
2 years
Wide-ranging
One indicator on
governance index. property rights.
Economist
Intelligence
Unit
Democracy EIU
Index
Global
Annual
Wide-ranging
One indicator on
governance index. property rights.
Heritage
Foundation
Index of
Economic
Freedon
Global
Annual
A governance
One indicator on
index
property rights.
predominantly
based on other
reporting initiatives
Bertelsmann
Stiftung
IEF
One section on
property rights
and protection
thereof. Mostly
relevant for
formal sector
businesses.
Page 11
http://worldcitizenconsul
ting.net/images/Scorec
ard_Methodology_Chap
ter_1.pdf;
http://www.irpf.org/reso
urce/score-cardreports2
http://www.cepii.fr/instit
utions/EN/ipd.asp
http://www.btiproject.org/index/metho
de/
http://www.economist.c
om/media/pdf/DEMOC
RACY_INDEX_2007_v
3.pdf
http://www.heritage.org/i
Hard to interpret because the
indicator covers different issues. Data ndex/property-rights
only as good as the sources it is
based on.
3 Data sources
Project
monitoring
frameworks
MCC
Common
Indicators
MCC
MMC projects
Project
limited
Harmonized
indicators for use
in the evaluation of
MCC projects.
http://www.mcc.gov/doc
uments/guidance/guida
nce-2012001109601common-indicators.pdf
World Bank
Harmonized
indicators for use
in the evaluation of
World Bank land
administration
projects.
IFAD
Global (IFAD
programmes)
A system of
standard indicators
for evaluating the
impact of IFAD
projects.
Annual
Page 12
3 Data sources
Participatory
assessment
frameworks
(may also
include use of
secondary
data and key
informant
interviews)
GLTN
Gender
Evaluation
Criteria
GEC
Sub-national
use in several
countries
No fixed
schedule
Page 13
http://www.gltn.net/inde
x.php/resources/publica
tions/publicationslist/finish/3-gltndocuments/31-genderevaluation-criteria-forlarge-scale-land-toolsbrief-eng-2012
4 Other frameworks
Land governance indicators database DRAFT
Initiative
Abbr. used
ILC members
Land Watch
Asia Land
Reform
Monitoring
Indicators
LWA
Piloted?
Short
description
Focus
Methodology
Comments
Reference
Tenure security
not collected in
global
implementation
Indicators devised
by UN-HABITAT
Global Urban
Observatory to
monitor the
Habitat Agenda
and MDG7,
Target 11. Tenure
security indicators
were devised but
not used to
calculate slum
population.
Includes indicators
on property rights,
protections
against eviction
and rates of
eviction.
The suggested
methodology includes
legal anaysis, expert
opinion (land
professionals, NGOs
working of shelter) and
secondary data from
different stakeholders.
http://www.un
habitat.org/do
wnloads/docs
/Urban_Indic
ators.pdf
Piloted in 7
countries
A framework for
assessing the
outcomes of (or
need for) land
reforms.
Tenure-related
conflicts and land
ownership
distribution.
http://www.la
ndcoalition.or
g/publications
/cso-landreformmonitoringasia
Page 1
4 Other frameworks
GCIF
Global City
Indicators
Facility
GCIF
Landesa
Landesa
Practical
Guides
Landesa PG
FAO
Governing
land for
women and
men
technical
guide
TGG
Initiative that
allows member
cities to share
data on a
standard set of
indicators
Detailed
frameworks for
the analysis of
tenure and
inheritance rights
from a gender
perspective.
Includes shelter
indicators.
Land property
rights and
inheritance rights
under statutory
and customary
regimes.
Page 2
http://www.fa
o.org/docrep/
017/i3114e/i3
114e.pdf
4 Other frameworks
Indicator proposals
UN
Proposed
HABITAT/GLTN system for
monitoring
security of
tenure
GLTN2011
Largely piloted
through LIFI
and UIS
Page 3
See Bazogu
et al. 2011,
Monitoring
Security of
Tenure in
Cities:
People, Land
and Policies,
UNHABITAT,
http://www.un
habitat.org/p
mss/listItemD
etails.aspx?p
ublicationID=
3262
4 Other frameworks
All the indicators should
be measurable using
administrative data,
where available.
Two indicators
focus on gender
disaggregated
ownership of land
and dwellings.
Access to justice,
right to legal
identity, right to
information and
resource rights.
The suggested
methodologies are legal
analysis (namati1),
surveys for perception
questions and
administrative data, 3rd
party monitoring for the
others.
World Bank
WB prop.
Indicators
suggested for
reg.
monitoring
Land governance
Indicators
outputs
proposed for
regular monitoring
by LGAF
coordinators.
UN Women
A
UN Women
transformativ
e stand-alone
goal on
achieving
gender
equality,
women's
rights and
women's
empowermen
t
Proposal on a
goal, targets and
indicators on
gender for the
post-2015
agenda.
Namati
Proposal on legal
empowerment
indicators for the
post-2015
agenda.
Page 4
http://www.un
women.org/e
n/news/storie
s/2013/6/unwomenlaunchesglobal-call-foratransformativ
e-agenda-tomake-genderequality-areality/
http://www.na
mati.org/cons
ultations/;
http://www.na
mati.org/wpcontent/uploa
ds/2013/06/J
ustice-2015Annex-I.pdf
5 Indicators analysis
Land governance indicators database DRAFT
Main topic
Inputs
Policy
development
process
Sub-topic
Definitional issues
Possible applications
Page 1
5 Indicators analysis
Legal and
policy
frameworks
Legal
protection of all
legitimate land
rights and uses
LGAF 1i-iv,
LSLA10. UI 1.4
(2,6), 1.5 (1-2).
LIFI 2, 3.1, 4.1-2,
5.4, 6.71. PBAS
A. GHI P1.4.
Namati. Landesa
PG3. GEC 1112. ILC
Page 2
An indicator on legal
recognition or legal protection
from forced eviction is a strong
candidate for a core global
indicator, and should also be
seen as an important element
of any national-level
comprehensive evaluation,
such as currently through
LGAF. The human rightsbased approach has particular
methodological merit in
avoiding key definitional
problems, although there is
also merit in emphasizing the
need to legally recognize
customary tenure or the
concept of a continuum of
tenure rights.
5 Indicators analysis
Discrimination UI 1.4.5, 1.5.6.
in property
LIFI 5.1-2, 5.4.
rights (general) PBAS B. SIGI.
GHI P1.1, 1.3,
1.5. Landesa
PG3. GEC 8.
TGG.
Discrimination
in property
rights
(inheritance)
Statutory
regulation of
common an
customary
properties
UI 1.4.6. LIFI
5.3. SIGI.
Landesa PG2.
TGG.
LGAF 1v, 2v.
PBAS E.
Page 3
5 Indicators analysis
Resources
Adequacy of
budget
allocation
Institutions
Clarity of
institutional
mandates
Expert assessment.
Page 4
5 Indicators analysis
Process Recording
tenure rights
es
Other barriers
to tenure
registration
Page 5
5 Indicators analysis
Quality of
tenure records
Accessibility of LGAF 5iv, 16 i-vi, The ability of the public to access land
tenure records LSLA3. IPMS
registry information (records), and the
1.2.1, 1.2.3.
constraints involved in doing so.
Institutional
capacity and
efficiency
Page 6
5 Indicators analysis
Recorded
tenure rights by
land area/#
properties
LGAF 2i-iii,
LSLA1. WB
CSI2-3. PBAS C.
GHI P2.2-3.
MCC L-5.
Recorded
tenure rights by
population
(gender)
Page 7
The
recordation/documentation of
tenure rights is a key indicator
in any national or sub-national
context in which tenure rights
formalization is an important
policy objective. This often the
case but not always. Their is
also widespread recognition
that extensive formalization is
not always cost effective, and
that alternative approaches
based on strengthening the
security provided by a
continuum of tenure rights
may be more cost effective in
many contexts. In such
contexts, other indicators may
be more relevant. Nonetheless
this can be seen as a key
national-level and project
indicator.
5 Indicators analysis
Land valuation
Accuracy and
accessibility of
valuation
records
LGAF 10i-ii
Land taxation
Scope,
consistency
and efficiency
of taxation
Page 8
5 Indicators analysis
Extent/Appropri LGAF 4i-ii, IPMS Justifiability of land use restrictions.
ateness of land 1.1.3, 1.3.1. GHI Another potentially important issue
use regulations R5.6.
included here is whether alternative
tenure documents can be used to obtain
building permits.
Costs of
planning
permissions
Dispute
resolution
Clarity/nonLGAF 20ii-iii.
overlap of
Landesa PG3.
responsibilities
Gender
Landesa PG3.
sensitivity
GEC 10. TGG.
(excluding
general access
issues)
Users costs (e.g. formal fees, time and Comparable issues as for costs of
number of procedures are covered by
tenure administration.
indicators) involved in obtaining a
building permit.
Whether efforts are made to enforce
spatial planning regulations. Two LGAF
indicators refer to enforcement, but a
larger number cover the effectiveness of
spatial planning. The latter are
addressed under Outcomes Land
use.
The critical issue here is the prevention
of forum-shopping by making sure that
responsibilities are clearly defined, nonoverlapping, with the hierarchy of
instances clear. The formal allocation of
a role to customary and alternative
dispute resolutions institutions is part of
this.
Cultural, cost, capacity, information and
accountability constraints on the use of
dispute resolution/judicial services by all
land users.
Page 9
5 Indicators analysis
Efficiency of
dispute
resolution
LGAF 21 ii-iii.
MCC L-4. LWA.
LSMS. TGG.
Public land
Appropriatenes LGAF 12i
management
s of public land
and
designations
management of
LSLA
Page 10
5 Indicators analysis
Assessment of LGAF LSLA 14.
potential
impacts of
public land
disposal/LSLA
Page 11
5 Indicators analysis
Land reforms
Eligibility and
(Readjustment, rights of
restitution,
beneficiaries
redistribution)
Expropriation
and eviction
Landesa PG3
Readjustment
outputs
Landesa CS.
LSMS.
Household surveys
Treatment of
affected land
users, by
tenure status
Provision of
compensation
and other
procedures
Page 12
5 Indicators analysis
Provision of
means of
redress
LGAF 14iv-v. UI
1.5., 1.5.5. LIFI
3.2, 6.7.2.
GLTN2011
City2. Landesa
CS.
Extent of
expropriation
WB prop 5
Page 13
5 Indicators analysis
Community/
indigenous
tenure
administration
Household
decisionmaking
Justifiability of
expropriation,
eviction
LGAF 13i-ii.
Standards on the avoidance of forced
Namati. Landesa eviction require that expropriation only
CS.
take place for a legitimate public interest
(and not, for example, as a way of
providing cheap land for private actors).
These indicators thus test another
aspect of preventing forced evictions
whether expropriated land is in fact used
for private purposes.
Allocation and
transfers
Landesa PG3,
PG2. TGG.
Dispute
resolution
LGAF 20ii.
Landesa PG3,
PG2.
See: above.
See: above.
See: above.
Household
decisionmaking
Landesa PG2.
LSMS.
Page 14
In-depth evaluation.
5 Indicators analysis
Cross-cutting
characteristics
Page 15
5 Indicators analysis
Perceptions of UIS
tenure security 12.GLTN2011
HH2, ext1.3.
Namati3.
Landesa CS.
LSMS.
History of
possession
GLTN2011ext
2.2, 3. LSMS.
Page 16
A potentially useful
supplementary indicator to
include in household surveys.
5 Indicators analysis
Perceptions of
accountability
Perceptions of
rights
GLTN2011ext
4.1-4. Landesa
CS. LSMS.
Accountability
of local land
decisionmaking
Namati
Page 17
Surveys.
An outcome indicator,
principally on the spatial
planning aspect of responsible
land governance, that
potentially has relevance
across urban and rural,
developed and developing
contexts. However, this is not
a central policy focus at the
moment.
5 Indicators analysis
Access to land
Page 18
5 Indicators analysis
Access to land GCIF. MICS
(housing)
HC10. UIS 1.
LSMS. PHCensus.
Land
ownership by
gender
GHI P1.2. UN
Women. LSMS.
PH-Census.
WCA.
Page 19
5 Indicators analysis
Transfers
Rates of
inheritance by
gender
Market
functionality
PBAS D.
Landesa CS.
Page 20
5 Indicators analysis
Extent and
Matrix
nature of LSLA
Land use
Conformity of
land use with
decisions/
regulations
Page 21
5 Indicators analysis
Impacts
Investment
Unclassif Unclassified
ied
Investments
made by
farmers
Landesa CS.
LSMS.
Unclassified
Page 22
Topic
Sub-topic
Inputs
Participation in land
Policy
developm policy development
process
ent
process
Abbr.
Indicator/question
LGAF 6i
A comprehensive policy exists or can be inferred by the existing legislation. Land policy decisions that
affect sections of the community are based on consultation with those affected, and their feedback on
the resulting policy is sought and incorporated in the resulting policy
LIFI 1
GEC 2
Multi-stakeholder involvement
Is the decision making process in developing the tool, and within the tool itself, transparent and
inclusive for both women and men?
% of women and men members of formal land policy-making institutions and structures.
TGG
TGG
TGG
TGG
TGG
TGG
TGG
TGG
TGG
TGG
% of formal land policy-making meetings and fora that include participation from grassroots groups
representing both women and men.
% of government officials directly involved in the land policy-making process who have been trained
and sensitized on gender issues.
% of women and men among government officials participating in land policy-making structures and
institutions.
% of women and men among civil society representatives participating in land policy-making structures
and institutions.
% of women and men among private sector representatives participating in land policy-making
structures and institutions.
% of women and men members of land law reform commissions.
% of women and men members of legal drafting teams working on land-related subsidiary laws,
regulations and procedures.
Presence of participatory and consultative legal drafting processes involving women and men from the
grassroots.
% of womens groups proposals taken into account and integrated in the adopted legal instruments.
Page 1
LGAF 6ii
Land policies incorporate equity objectives that are regularly and meaningfully monitored, and their
impact on equity issues is compared to that of other policy instruments
LGAF 6iv Land institutions report on land policy implementation in a regular, meaningful, and comprehensive
way, with reports being publicly accessible.
GEC 3
Does the tool rely on and provide sex-disaggregated data?
GEC 7
Does the tool provide mechanisms for assessment and evaluation (at numerous levels) by female and
male stakeholders?
Legal and Legal protection of all LGAF 1i
policy
legitimate land rights
framework and uses
s
LGAF 1ii
Existing legal framework recognizes rights held by most of the rural population, either through
customary or statutory tenure regimes.
Existing legal framework recognizes rights held by most of the urban population, either through
customary or statutory tenure regimes.
LGAF 1iii The tenure of most groups in rural areas is formally recognized, and clear regulations exist regarding
groups internal organization and legal representation.
LGAF 1iv Group tenure in informal urban areas is formally recognized, and clear regulations exist regarding the
internal organization and legal representation of groups.
LGAF 3ii
Legislation exists to formally recognize long-term, unchallenged possession and applies to both public
and private land, although different rules may apply.
LGAF
LSLA10
Contractual provisions regarding acquisition of land from communities or the public are required by law
to explicitly mention the way in which benefits and risks will be shared
UI 1.4
Achievements of the right to adequate housing in the Constitution or National law for all citizens
UI 1.4.2
a) Does the Constitution or national law promote the full and progressive realisation of the right to
adequate housing? b) If yes, is this right mentioned as one to which everybody is entitled? c) If yes, is
this right mentioned for particular groups?
Page 2
Level at which secure tenure is ensured for households and individuals as measured by the questions
(below) on the legal framework related to eviction
UI 1.5.1
UI 1.5.2
LIFI 2
LIFI 3.1
LIFI 4.1
LIFI 4.2
LIFI 5.4
Renters have tenure security according to clear regulations and rent is regulated
LIFI 6.7.1 Individuals have legal entitlement to access information and consultation about decisions that might
violate their right to adequate housing
PBAS A Access to land for rural poor households - The law guarantees secure, equal and enforceable land
rights to all
GHI P1.4 Does the law recognize the customary or tribal land rights of indigenous people?
Namati
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
GEC 11
GEC 12
The number of countries that legally recognize customary land tenure and/or community land and
resource rights
What rights to land does the State retain? (State owns all land; State owns natural resources but not
urban or agricultural land; State has the right to take private land for public purpose, etc.)
Does the law recognize private property rights?
Are communal rights to land recognized by law? If so, what is the nature and scope of those rights?
Are customary rights to land recognized by law? If so, what is the nature and scope of those rights?
Does the tool promote the principle of a bundle of rights?
Does the tool provide different tenure options, recognizing a continuum of rights?
Page 3
UI 1.4.5
a) Are there impediments to women owning land? b) Are there impediments to particular groups
owning land?
UI 1.5.6
Are spouses living in the same dwelling as the owner automatically recognised as co-owners in the
law?
Laws of property inheritance and property registration are non-discriminatory.
LIFI 5.1
LIFI 5.2
PBAS B
SIGI
GHI P1.1
GHI P1.3
GHI P1.5
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Women have the same legal rights as men to own and access land
Can women legally own or inherit land?
Can land be jointly owned by husband and wife?
Are immigrants, refugees and non-citizens allowed to own land?
Does the law recognize womens rights to property?
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Does the law limit the category of land women can own (vs. men)? For example, there are often
restrictions on women owning ancestral land.
Does a womans marital status have an impact on her right to own land? If yes, which land? In what
way?
Does the law permit common ownership (co-ownership) of land between individuals? (This may be in
the law on property rights, land laws, or personal laws or elsewhere.)
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Does the law restrict who may be a common owner? Does the law restrict what category of land can be
co-owned?
Does the law presume joint property rights for married couples? (Do married couples by law have joint
property rights unless they contract out of their rights?)
Landesa
PG3
Does the law provide for division of property between spouses in the event of disappearance or
abandonment? What does the law say about abandonment? What does the law say about out
migration of husbands?
If the law recognizes custom as a source of law, how does it handle conflicts between the statutory law
and customs, particularly when it comes to land rights for women? Which law is dispositive?
Page 4
Discrimination in
property rights
(inheritance)
Landesa
PG3
What does the law say about compensation for compulsory acquisition and/or the state taking land?
How is compensation determined? Who is compensation paid to? Who has the right to compensation
for the loss of rights?
GEC 8
Is the tool based on the principle of gender equality and does it protect womens land/ tenure rights?
TGG
UI 1.4.6
a) Are there impediments to women inheriting land and housing? b) Are there impediments to particular
groups inheriting land and housing?
LIFI 5.3
SIGI
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
Is a surviving wife an heir under the law? What are the wife's rights? Are they the same in nature and
scope as those of other heirs?
Does the law recognize cohabitation/consensual unions/couples who put themselves forward as
married? If so, what are the inheritance rights for women in those relationships?
Landesa
PG2
What is the nature and scope of the right to inherit as a wife? Is the right that is inherited limited in time
or by some event (e.g. until she remarries or until her children are of the age of majority)? Is it an
ownership right? Or is it ownership like (e.g. long-term, secure use rights)? Can she transfer the rights
gained by inheritance, sale, bequest, gift, or otherwise? Do wives have a right to a lifetime use right to
any or all of the land (house, household garden, etc.)? Is land specifically mentioned? How/who
decides which land? What are the requirements? Are different use rights (e.g. the right to collect herbs
or graze animals) accounted for?
Landesa
PG2
Is there a right of survivorship (one spouse automatically inherits the whole of the land they hold
in common ownership or joint tenure)? If yes, does it only apply to married couples or to all people who
have joint rights to land? If it only applies to married couples, what proof of marriage is required? If
there is not a right of survivorship, how is inheritance of jointly held property handled? Are there limits to
physical partition of property in this or any other law?
Page 5
What do the intestate inheritance provisions say about wives inheritance? If wives inherit, what land is
included? What is not? Is the family home included? What percentage of a husbands property do
wives inherit if she has children? What percentage of a husbands property do wives inherit if she has
no children?
Landesa
PG2
Are there any procedures which must be followed to ensure inheritance provisions apply? For example,
must the death be registered and death certificate received?
Landesa
PG2
Are the intestate provisions for spouses triggered only when there is a formal marriage? If yes: What
constitutes a formal (statutory) marriage? What documents are required for proof of marriage? What
documents are required to register a marriage (birth certificates, residency certificates, etc.)? If no:
What other types of marriages trigger the intestate law (e.g. customary or religious)? What is required
for proof of these marriages?
Landesa
PG2
Can a wife be disinherited completely by will? If no, what is the mandatory set aside for wives? If yes,
are there any other protections for her (e.g. use of family home until she dies or remarries)?
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
Is polygamy legal? If yes, how is land (or other property) divided between the wives? Are there
provisions related to the children of more than one wife? If yes, how is land (or other property) divided
between the children?
Are daughters and sons both considered heirs by law? Are they heirs of the same order? If yes, do
daughters and sons have an equal right to inherit property? Does this apply to movable and immovable
property? Do the intestate provisions specifically mention a daughters right to inherit land? Are a
daughters rights to inherit affected by her marital status or a by a change in her marital status? What
are the rights to inherit of a daughter from a subsequent wife in a polygamous relationship?
Is there any type of land a daughter cannot inherit (e.g. ancestral land)?
Page 6
What does the law say about distribution of resources, and rights to those resources, if land cannot be
physically partitioned? Can children (either males or females) be completely disinherited by will or by
law (intestate)? If yes, are there specific grounds? Is there a mandatory set aside for children (meaning
that they cannot be fully disinherited by will)? If yes, what portion of the inheritance must be set aside?
TGG
existence of inheritance laws coherent with and supportive of tenure reforms and gender-equitable
governance of land tenure.
The law provides opportunities for those holding land under customary, group, or collective tenure to
fully or partially individualize land ownership and use. Procedures for doing so are affordable, clearly
specified, safeguarded, and followed in practice.
Common property under condominiums is recognized, and there are clear provisions in the law to
establish arrangements for the management and maintenance of this common property
PBAS E
Regulation for the allocation and management of common property resources - Clear and equitable
Landesa
PG3
Are the communal/customary governance rules codified or otherwise written? By law, who determines
what these rights are? Are they subject to legal review? Who (which body?) has authority to govern
land held under communal/customary tenure?
Landesa
PG3
Does the formal law recognize any rights for women within that customary group? If so, what rights do
women have to communal/customary land? Do women have the right to own land, use land, control
land, use land for specific purpose, use land at a specific time?
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Which forums have statutory authority to hear property rights cases involving communal or customary
land?
Which forums have statutory authority to hear cases of division of marital property for those married
under customary rules?
Does the law recognize or require any pre-steps before taking a case to court (e.g. compulsory
mediation, alternative dispute resolution, traditional courts, etc.)? If so, are the findings of those
hearings used in the formal court?
Page 7
Which individuals have rights to the communally/customarily held land? Is the right based on
membership in a household, village, clan, tribe, group? How are those rights different for men and
women? What is the nature and scope of rights for men and women who are members of or affiliated
with the group?
Landesa
PG3
Are there circumstances in which women lose their rights to communal/customary land? If so, what are
these circumstances (divorce, death of spouse, abandonment, etc.)? Are the rules different for
communal or customary land than they are for individual or household land?
Landesa
PG3
Does the customary land governance system recognize womens rights to own land? Under what
circumstances? (What if a woman is married, single, divorced, widowed, remarried, has children out of
wedlock or children from another marriage?) What is the nature and scope of this right? Is it different
from the rights of similarly situated men?
Landesa
PG3
Does the customary land governance system recognize womens rights to control land? Under what
circumstances? (What if a woman is married, single, divorced, widowed?) What is the nature and
scope of this right? Is it different from the rights of similarly situated men?
Landesa
PG3
Does the customary land governance system recognize womens rights to use land? Under what
circumstances? (What if a woman is married, single, divorced, widowed?) What is the nature and
scope of this right? Is it different from the rights of similarly situated men?
Landesa
PG3
Does the customary land governance system recognize womens rights to exercise decisions over land
and income from the land? Under what circumstances? (What if a woman is married, single, divorced,
widowed?) What is the nature and scope of this right? Is it different from the rights of similarly situated
men?
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
If land is owned communally but is allocated to individual households for their use, what is the nature
and scope of the rights for the individual household? Can those rights be transferred by inheritance (or
otherwise)?
Are there different rights for people within the household? I.e. is the male household head presumed to
be the manager of the land?
Page 8
Landesa
PG2
Is brideprice or dowry exchanged at the time of marriage? If yes, is this considered a daughters premortem inheritance? If yes, who receives the marital gift? (Possible recipients include: daughter, son,
parents of daughter, or parents of son.) If yes, who has control over the marital gift once it is received?
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
If yes, does the family ever sell land to provide this marriage gift?
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
If polygamy is legal, how are the land and house(s) divided among the wives?
Landesa
PG2
Do unmarried women (single, divorced, or widowed) inherit land from their fathers if they are living at
home?
Do widows remain on their deceased husbands land/ house? If yes, are there any limitations to this
(e.g. widows can only remain on the land/house until the time she remarries or until her children are of
the age of majority or are married)?
LGAF 6iii. Cost of implementation of land policy is estimated, expected benefits are identified and compared to
cost, and there are sufficient budget, resources, and institutional capacity for implementation
LGAF 18iii There is significant investment in capital in the system to record rights in land so that the system is
sustainable but still accessible by the poor.
GEC 5
Are financial resources explicitly allocated for capacity building of both women and men to benefit from
the tool?
LGAF12iv There are adequate budgets and human resources that ensure responsible management of public
lands.
Page 9
There is a clear separation in the roles of policy formulation, implementation of policy through land
management and administration, and the arbitration of any disputes that may arise as a result of
implementation of policy.
The mandated responsibilities exercised by the authorities dealing with land administration issues are
clearly defined and nonoverlapping with those of other land sector agencies.
LGAF 5iii Assignment of land-related responsibilities between the different levels of government is clear and
nonoverlapping.
LGAF12iii The management responsibility for different types of public land is unambiguously assigned.
LGAF 3iii The costs for first-time sporadic registration for a typical urban property is low compared to the property
value.
LGAF 3iv There are no informal fees that need to be paid to effect first registration.
LGAF 3v The requirements for formalizing housing in urban areas are clear, straightforward, affordable, and
implemented consistently in a transparent manner.
LGAF 18i The cost for registering a property transfer is minimal compared to the property value.
WB CSI4 Average number of days to complete the recordation of a purchase/sale of a property in the land
administration system (days, by rural/urban)
DB
Procedures to legally transfer title (between two local companies) on immovable property in country's
Registerin largest business city (number)
g property
DB
Cost to legally transfer title (between two local companies) on immovable property in country's largest
Registerin business city (% property value)
g property
DB
Time to legally transfer title (between two local companies) on immovable property in country's largest
Registerin business city (days)
g property
Page 10
Other barriers to
tenure registration
MCC L-7
Percentage change in time for property transactions - The average percentage change in number of
days for an individual or company to conduct a property transaction within the formal system ((A) First
time registration/Transfers; (B) Commercial/Non-commercial)
MCC L-8
Percentage change in cost for property transactions - The average percentage change in US Dollars of
out of pocket cost for an individual or company to conduct a property transaction within the formal
system ((A) First time registration/Transfers; (B) Commercial/Non-commercial)
LSMS
LSMS
LGAF 3i
LGAF 3v
LGAF 3vi There is a clear, practical process for the formal recognition of possession, and this process is
implemented effectively, consistently, and transparently.
GHI P2.1 Is there an operating program to register titles or incremental tenure documents?
GHI P3.1 Is there a policy or program that supports the regularization of titles or alternative documents in
established informal settlements?
GHI P3.4 Is there a process or program to recognize occupancy of public land? For example, certificates of
occupancy, street addressing or other official documents are given to informal settlers.
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Does the state/national government provide any incentives for registering land in womens names?
What documents are required to register land jointly?
Page 11
Quality of tenure
records
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG2
What documents are required to prove eligibility for presumed joint ownership or compulsory joint
ownership?
In the context of documentation of land rights, what are the rules around polygamy and co-owned land?
Landesa
PG2
How is a transfer of land rights by inheritance documented? Are transfers of land rights by inheritance
registered? If so, where? Is this different for intestate and testate inheritance?
If land is distributed (or formalized) to households, by law, whose name must be listed on the title?
Whose name(s) has to be registered?
What process is required to legally recognize the transfer of land rights that occur via inheritance? Are
any documents such as a land title, deed or certificate required? Is a death certificate required?
Landesa What is the process required to formalize an inherited right to land?where do people go, what is
PG2
required for proof, etc.?
LGAF 5iv Information related to rights in land is available to other institutions that need this information at
reasonable cost and is readily accessible, largely because land information is maintained in a uniform
way.
LGAF 16i Most records for privately held land registered in the registry are readily identifiable in maps in the
registry or cadastre.
LGAF 16ii Relevant private encumbrances are recorded consistently and in a reliable fashion and can be verified
at low cost by any interested party.
LGAF 16iii Relevant public restrictions or charges are recorded consistently and in a reliable fashion and can be
verified at a low cost by any interested party.
LGAF 17ii There are meaningful published service standards, and the registry actively monitors its performance
against these standards.
LGAF 17i Most ownership information in the registry or cadastre is up to date.
IPMS
Cadastral information Is zoning/permitted use information included and are regulations respoected
1.2.1
and enforced?
IPMS
Cadastral information Are GIS/GPS used to create and update the registry?
1.2.1
LIFI 6.1
Basic land registration / recording systems are in place and operational. HHs with informal tenure are
included in the information systems
GLTN201 Informal settlements are included within the land information systems
1 City1
Page 12
% of respondents who report paying bribes, by sector (includes Registry and permit services, Land
services (in 2009 survey))
Page 13
LGAF 18ii The total fees collected by the registry exceed the total registry operating costs.
LIFI 6.2
LIFI 6.3
LIFI 6.4
MCC L-2
Land administration offices established or upgraded - The number of land administration and service
offices or other related facilities that the project physically establishes or upgrades (Urban/Rural)
LGAF 2i
Tenure
documentation/registr
ation by land area/#
properties
LGAF 2ii
LGAF 2iii
LGAF
LSLA 1
WB CSI2
Most communal lands have boundaries demarcated and surveyed or mapped and communal rights
registered.
WB CSI3 Target land area with use or ownership rights recorded as a result of the project (ha)
WB prop
2
WB prop
4
PBAS C
No. of land transfers of different types (sales, mortgages, gifts, inheritances, etc.) registered
Share of privately owned and state land area mapped
Land tenure - Secure and enforceable land rights. The majority of land holdings are titled or registered
GHI P2.2 Estimated percent of all the properties in the greater municipality that have their title properly
registered. (%)
GHI P2.3 Are titles updated regularly when property is transferred?
Page 14
Parcels corrected or incorporated in land system - The number of parcels with relevant parcel
information corrected or newly incorporated into an official land information system (whether a system
for the property registry, cadastre or an integrated system)
LGAF 2iv A high percentage of land registered to physical persons is registered in the name of women, either
Tenure
individually or jointly.
documentation/registr
ation by population
(incl. Gender)
WB CSI1 Target population with use or ownership rights recorded as a result of the project (number)
WB prop
1
UIS 2
UIS 3
UIS 4
UIS 5
UIS 6
UIS 7
UIS 8
UIS 9
UIS 10
GLTN201
1 HH1
GLTN201
1ext 2.1
GCIF
RIMS
(If owner) Do you have one of the below documents as evidence of your rights over this dwelling?
% families which hold: Titles; Certificate of occupation; Purchase agreement/receipt; Property tax
receipts; Utility bills; No documents
No. of households without registered legal titles
Number of HHs provided with long-term security of tenure of natural resources, including land and
water
GHI P3.2b Number of households living in informal settlements in the greater municipality who have titles provided
by a regularization program.
Page 15
Land
valuation
Accuracy and
accessibility of
valuation records
MCC L-6
Household land rights formalized - The number of households receiving formal recognition of
ownership and/or use rights through certificates, titles, leases, or other recorded documentation by
government institutions or traditional authorities at national or local levels ((A) Urban/Rural; (B)
Community/Male(only)/Female (only) /Joint male and female/Joint male/Joint female (Note that the
disaggregations in B should be mutually exclusive and not include multiple selections.))
Landesa
CS
Landesa
CS
Landesa
CS
Landesa
CS
LWA
LSMS
LSMS
LSMS
LSMS
LSMS
Number of households with recognized land tenure documentation (land contract or land certificate)
LSMS
LSMS
LGAF 10i The assessment of land and property values for tax purposes is based on market prices with minimal
differences between recorded values and market prices across different uses and types of users, and
valuation rolls are regularly updated.
LGAF 10ii There is a policy that valuation rolls be publicly accessible, and this policy is effective for all properties
that are considered for taxation.
Land
taxation
Scope, consistency
and efficiency of
taxation
LGAF 7iii Mechanisms to allow the public to capture a significant share of the gains from changing land use are
regularly used and applied transparently based on clear regulation.
Page 16
LGAF 7ii
Extent/appropriatene LGAF 4i
ss of land use
regulations
LGAF 4ii
In urban areas, public input is sought in preparing and amending changes in land use plans, and the
public responses are explicitly referenced in the report prepared by the public body responsible for
preparing the new public plans. This report is publicly accessible.
In rural areas, public input is sought in preparing and amending changes in land use plans, and the
public responses are explicitly referenced in the report prepared by the public body responsible for
preparing the new public plans. This report is publicly accessible.
There is a series of regulations regarding urban land use, ownership, and transferability that are for the
most part justified on the basis of overall public interest and that are enforced.
There is a series of regulations regarding rural land use, ownership, and transferability that are for the
most part justified on the basis of overall public interest and that are enforced.
IPMS
Bundle of rights (extent of restrictions imposed on property rights)
1.1.3
IPMS
Land What is the status of land ownership? (extent of restrictions imposed on property rights)
1.3.1
GHI R5.6 Can alternative documents be used in place of official property title to obtain construction permits?
Costs of planning
permissions
LGAF 9i
Requirements to obtain a building permit are technically justified, affordable, and clearly disseminated.
Page 17
There is a series of regulations regarding urban land use, ownership, and transferability that are for the
most part justified on the basis of overall public interest and that are enforced.
There is a series of regulations regarding rural land use, ownership, and transferability that are for the
most part justified on the basis of overall public interest and that are enforced.
Accessibility of
dispute resolution
Landesa If there are multiple legal systems that deal with marital property, what is the process for determining
PG3
which law and adjudicative body applies?
LGAF 20i Institutions for providing a first instance of conflict resolution are accessible at the local level in the
majority of communities.
LGAF 20iv A process and mechanism exist to appeal rulings on land cases at reasonable cost, with disputes
resolved in a timely manner.
Landesa For division of property upon divorce, are there any requirements for getting into court? Are there any
PG3
up-front payments?
Landesa Are there barriers to accessing the formal system of adjudication? I.e. fees, assumption of literacy
PG3
(does something need to be written), identification documents, etc.
Page 18
Gender sensitivity
(excluding general
access issues)
Efficiency of dispute
resolution
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
TGG
TGG
TGG
% of women and men receiving advocacy and legal literacy training focusing on land.
Landesa
PG3
What forums have statutory jurisdiction to hear property or land rights related cases? (E.g. formal
courts, courts of special jurisdiction, traditional dispute resolution actors recognized for certain cases,
etc.) Do those forums have female representation?
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
GEC 10
TGG
What forums have statutory jurisdiction to hear marital property cases? Do those forums have female
representation?
Do women and men have the same right to decide which law or adjudicative body applies?
What are the barriers that women face in resolving disputes? Possible barriers include: costs
associated with dispute resolution, location and hours of dispute resolution or enforcement bodies,
comfort dealing with these systems, social barriers, complexity of paperwork requirements, etc.
Page 19
Public
Appropriateness of
land
public land
managem designations
ent and
managem
ent of
LSLA
Accessibility of
information on pubic
lands
LGAF 12i Public land ownership is justified by the provision of public goods at the appropriate level of
government, and such land is managed in a transparent and effective way.
LGAF 12ii The majority of public land is clearly identified on the ground or on maps.
LGAF 12v All the information in the public land inventory is accessible to the public.
LGAF 12vi Key information for land concessions is recorded and publicly accessible.
Assessment of
potential impacts of
public land
disposal/LSLA
Efficiency of public
land disposal/LSLA
decisions
Transparency of
public land
disposal/LSLA
LGAF
LSLA14
For transfers of public/community lands, public institutions have procedures in place to identify and
select economically, environmentally, and socially beneficial investments and implement these
effectively
LGAF
LSLA11
The procedure to obtain approval for a project where it is required is reasonably short
LGAF 15i Most public land disposed of in the past 3 years is through sale or lease through public auction or open
tender process.
LGAF 15iii All types of public land are generally divested at market prices in a transparent process irrespective of
the investors status (for example, domestic or foreign).
Page 20
Monitoring and
contract enforcement
of LSLA
LGAF
LSLA4
LGAF
LSLA5
LGAF
LSLA6
Public institutions involved in land acquisition operate in a clear and consistent manner
LGAF
LSLA7
LGAF
LSLA8
LGAF
LSLA9
LGAF 15ii
There are direct and transparent negotiations between right holders and investors
LGAF
LSLA12
LGAF
LSLA13
LGAF
LSLA14
LGAF
LSLA15
LGAF
LSLA16
Social requirements for large scale investments in agriculture are clearly defined and implemented
Environmental requirements for large scale investments in agriculture are clearly defined and
implemented
For transfers of public/community lands, public institutions have procedures in place to identify and
select economically, environmentally, and socially beneficial investments and implement these
effectively
Compliance with safeguards related to investment in agriculture is checked
There are avenues to lodge complaints if agricultural investors do not comply with requirements
Page 21
Readjustment
outputs
If the Government has a land distribution program, who is eligible for land? Who is prioritized? What
documents are required? Do both women and men have access to the documents required for
eligibility? Are both women and mens names on the documents required for eligibility?
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Are women and men treated equally in the program? If not, in what ways?
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
CS
Landesa
CS
Landesa
CS
LSMS
What does the law say about household members who leave the household after distribution? (divorce,
married out, etc.)?
Frequency of village level land readjustments/re-contracting/
If land is distributed (or formalized) to households, by law, whose name must be listed on the title?
Whose name(s) has to be registered?
What are the rules for transfer of state land once it has been distributed to households? Are there
restrictions on sale, lease, or inheritance? Can the land be partitioned?
Expropriat Treatment of affected LGAF 2vi When loss of rights occurs as a result of land use change not involving expropriation, compensation in
land users, by tenure
cash or in kind is paid such that these people have comparable assets and can continue to maintain
ion and
status
prior social and economic status.
eviction
Provision of
compensation and
other procedures
LGAF 14ii Fair compensation, in kind or in cash, is paid to all those with rights expropriated regardless of the
registration status.
LGAF 14i Where property is expropriated, fair compensation, in kind or in cash, is paid so that the displaced
households have comparable assets and can continue to maintain prior social and economic status.
Page 22
Are the followings steps undertaken during eviction? a) Consultation (the future evictees are consulted
through formal meetings); b) Notification (the future evictees are formally notified in writing about the
date and process of eviction); c) Recording (the eviction case is formally recorded by the police, local
authority or any government institution); d) Compensation (compensation is provided to the evictee in
the form of property or funds); e) Relocation (the evictee is relocated in a new safe accommodation)
GHI P4.1a Did the eviction follow established legal guidelines for evictions?
GHI P4.1b How long in advance of the actual eviction were people first informed? (months)
GHI P4.1d The percentage of people who were resettled or given compensation roughly equivalent to the value of
their homes. (%)
Landesa Payment of compensation in cases of expropriation
CS
Landesa Farmer satisfaction with compensation payments
CS
Landesa Provision of advance notification
CS
Landesa Prior consultation on the amount of compensation
CS
LSMS
Receipt of compensation for readjustment/expropriation
LSMS
Compensation received for readjustment and reallocations in community
Provision of means of LGAF 14iv Independent avenues to lodge a complaint against expropriation exist and are easily accessible.
redress
LGAF 14v A first-instance decision has been reached for the majority of complaints about expropriation lodged
during the past 3 years.
UI 1.5.4
Is there legal aid support to evicted people?
UI 1.5.5
Is there legal aid support to family-related evictions (result of domestic violence, eviction by family
members, etc)?
LIFI 3.2
Legal aid to potential evictees - Legal provisions are practiced
LIFI 6.7.2 Institutions are accessible at local level and provide information and assistance
Page 23
Extent of
expropriation
Justifiability of
expropriation, eviction
GLTN201
1 City2
Landesa
CS
Landesa
CS
WB prop
5
LGAF 13i
LGAF 13ii The majority of land that has been expropriated in the past 3 years has been transferred to its destined
use.
Namati
Reduction in amount/proportion of communal land expropriated per year for private purposes, or
through compulsory state acquisition
Landesa Use of expropriated land
CS
Communit Allocation and
y/indigeno transfers
us tenure
administra
tion
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Who is responsible for the allocation of communal/customary land? What criteria are used for
allocation? What are the terms of use for communal/customary land?
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Page 24
Who decides when and whom a person should marry? Is there dowry or brideprice? Who receives it?
Does it ever include land? Who determines the amount?
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Do men bring land and/or housing to a new marriage? Are men allocated land by their families upon
marriage?
How are land rights allocated within marriage? When a couple marries, do they keep separate control
over the land they brought to the marriage? If new land is purchased during marriage, who does it
belong to?
What happens when a woman separates from or divorces her husband? Can she return to her parents
home? Does it matter whether or not she has children? Does it matter whether the children are girls or
boys? If she has to return home, is land allocated to her? By whom?
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG3
Do women who leave their husbands receive any land from his family? Do they receive any other
property or assets? Who decides this (e.g. husband, judge, tribal leader, etc.)? Is this decision
appealable?
What is the process a woman has to go through to receive land if she leaves her husband? What about
with other property/assets?
What happens when a woman separates from or divorces her husband? Can she return to her parents
home? Does it matter whether or not she has children? Does it matter whether the children are girls or
boys? If she has to return home, is land allocated to her? By whom?
Landesa
PG3
Landesa
PG2
Landesa
PG2
TGG
TGG
TGG
% number of customary land institutions and other land-related local institutions trained and sensitized
on gender and land issues.
If land is held communally, who is ultimately responsible for land distribution? Are women in that group?
Who is usually responsible for taking care of widows? If a specific child is responsible for taking care of
a widow or widows, what does that child usually inherit?
Page 25
Househol
d decisionmaking
Gender-related
Crosscutting
characteri
stics
LGAF 20ii There is an informal or community-based system that resolves disputes in an equitable manner, and
decisions made by this system have some recognition in the formal judicial or administrative dispute
resolution system.
Landesa Are women represented among those who resolve disputes?
PG3
Landesa Who is responsible for enforcing traditional court decisions?
PG3
Landesa Can women access the dispute resolution body on their own, or is there a required intermediary?
PG3
Landesa Is there any recourse to a higher authority/right to appeal? If so, who?
PG3
Landesa How are inheritance disputes resolved by custom?
PG2
Landesa Do both women and men bring inheritance complaints?
PG2
Landesa Are there any customary barriers to women going to court, government offices, or informal dispute
resolution bodies?
PG2
Landesa
PG2
Who makes decisions about how the land is allocated, managed, or used in the household? In the
community?
LSMS
GEC 6
Is the information clear to, and does it empower, both women and men to utilize the tool and know their
rights related to this tool?
GEC 7
Does the tool provide mechanisms for assessment and evaluation (at numerous levels) by female and
male stakeholders?
Does the tool acknowledge conflict of interests and the different gender impacts this may have?
GEC 9
GEC 13
Does the tool take into consideration statutory and customary laws and practices affecting womens
land rights?
Page 26
GEC 19
GEC 20
GEC 22
Does the tool demand positive results for women particularly in the context of traditional land
structures?
Does the tool encourage a market that is accessible to women and provides equity for women and
men?
Can the tool be implemented at city or national level?
Can the tool be implemented consistently (rather than ad-hoc)?
Is there formal engagement between communities and local/national governments?
TGG
TGG
TGG
TGG
number of gender-sensitive advocacy and legal literacy training sessions focusing on land.
TGG
TGG
number of communication tools and media used to get the message across on gender-equitable land
tenure governance.
% of women and men in central land administration and management institutions.
TGG
TGG
TGG
% of women and men working in the technical professions of land administration (surveying, valuation,
geodetics, GPS, etc.).
GEC 17
Outcome Tenure
security
s
Prevalence/severity
of disputes/evictions
LGAF 21i Land disputes in the formal court system are low compared to the total number of court cases.
LGAF
LSLA2
UI 1.7
Land acquisition generates few conflicts and these are addressed expeditiously and transparently
Average annual number of men-headed and women-headed households evicted from their dwellings
during the past five years
UIS 11
Have you heard of any forceful evictions in the city (yes/no)
GLTN201 Number of households evicted in the last five years per 10,000
1ext 1.1
Page 27
Page 28
Landesa
CS
LSMS
LSMS
History of possession GLTN201
1ext 2.2
GLTN201
1ext 3
LSMS
LSMS
LSMS
Perceptions of rights GLTN201
1ext 4.1
GLTN201
1ext 4.2
GLTN201
1ext 4.3
GLTN201
1ext 4.4
Landesa
CS
LSMS
Confidence in tenure security: The proportion of households who believe that household and
community land will not be confiscated or wrongfully acquired
Farmers' confidence in tenure security (perceived likelihood of further land readjustments)
Perception of tenure security
Reason for perception of tenure security
% families acquiring land by: Formal finance sources (public or private); Direct purchase from private
individuals/developers; Self-arranged building (direct labouring or via a developer)
% households residing at current dwelling for 10+ years (proxy indicator for adverse possession). The
same formula also holds for workplaces
Duration of occupation of dwelling
Mode of acquisition of agricultural land
Duration of possession/use of agricultural land
% families believing they have the right to prevent others from entering
% families believing they have the right to develop their dwelling
% families believing they have the right to sell
% families believing they have the right to inherit
Farmer's understanding of key provisions of national land laws and policies
Right to sell/use as collateral agricultural land
Proportion of households who believe they have a fair say in decisions about local land and natural
resources
Amount of land (ha) for which a) local communities possess rights to own, use, and conserve, and b)
decisions about land and natural resource use are taken through a process of local democratic
governance
Land ownership distribution by size (Gini coefficient)
Namati
LWA
Page 29
WCA
WCA
Access to land
(housing)
Number of sharecroppers
Number and percentage of landless persons among rural population
Household ownership of agricultural land
Household ownership of agricultural land (hectares)
Household ownership of agricultural land
Household ownership of agricultural land (hectares)
Tenure status of agricultural land (ownership, rental, sharecropping, squatted, other)
Area of agricultural land owned/rented/used
Value of agricultural land owned (also rental value)
Rent paid for agricultural land
Legal owner of land where land occupied without consent
Income from real estate sales
Income from real estate rent
Number of landless labourers in community
Own-account agriculture production (Supplementary topic, see UN 2007: 2.389-90)
Legal status of agricultural holder (Core topic, An individual; two or more individuals; juridical person
(the latter may be further sub-divided: public, corporation, religious institution, etc.) (Core topic, see
FAO 2005: 11.710)
Total area of holding (Core topic, see FAO 2005: 11.4045).
Land tenure types on the holding (Legal ownership or legal owner-like possession; non-legal ownership
or non-legal owner-like possession; rented from someone else; other types of land tenure) (Core topic,
see FAO 2005: 11.4652)
WCA
WCA
WCA
Terms of rental (for rented parcels) (For an agreed amount of money and/or produce; for a share of
produce; in exchange for services; under other rental arrangements) (Supplementary module topic, see
FAO 2005: 11.59).
No. of homeless people per 100,000 population
GCIF
Page 30
Land ownership by
gender
Market functionality
WCA
Sex of agricultural holder (Core topic, see FAO 2005: 11.1113)
GHI P1.2 In practice, do women own or inherit land?
LSMS
PBAS D
Landesa
CS
Landesa
CS
Page 31
Landesa
CS
Matrix
In the largest city in the country, urban development is controlled effectively by a hierarchy of regional
and detailed land use plans that are kept up to date.
LGAF 8ii
In the four major cities, urban development is controlled effectively by a hierarchy of regional and
detailed land use plans that are kept up to date.
LGAF 8iii In the largest city in the country, the urban planning process or authority is able to cope with the
increasing demand for serviced units and land as evidenced by the fact that almost all new dwellings
are formal.
LGAF 8iv Existing requirements for residential plot sizes are met in most plots.
LGAF 8v The share of land set aside for specific use that is used for a nonspecified purpose in contravention of
existing regulations is low.
UI 1.6
Percentage of the total housing stock in compliance with current land and building regulations
GLTN201 Proportion of informal occupants using public land that is not planned for infrastructure or other
1 Settservices within total city population
Com
Impacts
IEF
Number of instances of mid- to long-term investment made per farmer per year
Agricultural investments (type and value)
Property Rights Private property is guaranteed by the government. The court system enforces
contracts efficiently and quickly. The justice system punishes those who unlawfully confiscate private
property. There is no corruption or expropriation
Page 32
Extent to which private property rights protected and private business is free from undue government
influence
To what extent do government authorities ensure well-defined rights of private property and regulate
the acquisition, benefits, use and sale of property?
Page 33
7 LSMS surveys
Land governance indicators database DRAFT
Survey
Most recent completion of implementation
Years elapsed
Dwellings
Agricultural land
Loss of land
Documentation or legal status of communal land
Prevalence of tenure types and documentation in community
Reasons for (lack of) progress in documentation
Land adjustment and reallocations
Compensation received for readjustment and reallocations
Inheritance of property by men/women
Number of landless labourers in community
Page 1
7 LSMS surveys
1
Albania
LSMS
2
Armenia
Household
Budget
Survey
3
Azerbaijan
Survey of
Living
Conditions
4
Living in
BosniaHerzegovina
Survey
5
Brazil Survey
of Living
Conditions
6
7
Bulgaria Multi- China-Heibei
topic
and Liaoning
household
Living
survey
Standards
Survey
2005
8
1
1
1
1
1996
17
1
1
1995
18
1
1
1995
18
1
2007
6
1
1
2005
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1997
16
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Page 2
7 LSMS surveys
8
EcuadorEncuesta
Condiciones
de Vida
9
EthiopiaRural
socioeconomi
c survey
10
Ghana living
standards
survey
11
Guatemala
ENCOVI
survey
12
India - Uttar
Pradesh and
Bihar Survey
of Living
Conditions
13
Iraq
Household
SocioEconomic
Survey
14
Jamaica
Survey of
Living
Conditions
1998
15
1
2011
2
1
1998
15
1
2000
13
1
1998
15
1
2007
6
1
1
1
1997
16
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Page 3
7 LSMS surveys
15
16
Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan
Living
Standards
Measurement
Survey
17
Malawi Third
Integrated
Household
Survey
18
Nepal Living
Standards
Survey
1996
17
1
1
2011
2
1
2011
2
1
1
1
1
1998
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
19
NicaraguaEncuesta
Nacional de
Hogares
sobre
Medicin de
Nivel
2005 de Vida
8
1
20
Nigerl'Enqute
Nationale sur
les
Conditions de
Vie des
Mnages
et
2011
2
1
1
1
1
1
21
Nigeria GHSpanel
2011
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Page 4
7 LSMS surveys
22
Panama
Living
Standards
Survey
23
Papua New
Guinea
Household
Survey
24
Serbia Living
Standards
Measurement
Survey
25
Tajikistan
Living
Standards
Measurement
Survey
26
Tanzania
National
Panel Survey
27
Timor Leste
Survey of
Living
Standards
28
Uganda
National
Panel Survey
2008
5
1
1
1
1
1996
17
2007
6
1
1
2009
4
2011
2
1
2007
6
1
2011
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Page 5
1
1
7 LSMS surveys
29
Viet Nam
Household
Living
Standards
Survey
2004
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Total
27
13
15
21
4
10
4
3
1
27
26
16
12
11
3
9
14
3
9
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
4
4
12
17
7
3
2
1
4
Mean
Comments
Often this is a
Often it is
asked which
For example,
Ownership
and rental
This
Respondent
In cash or in
How the
Often this is a
Whether
Often it is
asked which
Very different
i.e. the nature
This includes
a wide range
The Niger
It is not
This may be
This may be
This is
Many surveys
i.e. whether
Surveys often
1
2
1
1
1
Page 6
8 WCA 2010
Land governance indicators database DRAFT
Mozambique Niger
1
1
1
1
Rwanda
Tanzania
1
1
1
1
1
1
El Salvador
Guatemala
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Page 1
India
Lao PDR
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nicaragua
10
8
4
3
10
7
3
3
1
4
3
1 Contents
DRAFT
Contents
This publication contains the following sheets:
1 Contents
2 Categorical Framework
3 Data sources
4 Other frameworks
- Describes published evaluation frameworks which may not have been used
for primary data collection, and indicator proposals made in relation to the
post-2015 development agenda - the other source of the indicators
catalogued in this publication.
- Information is given on piloting, focus, methodology, web-available reference,
and the abbreviation used in the tables.
- Relevance to different monitoring contexts is commented.
5 Indicators analysis
- For each indicator topic, indicators in the main table are listed by
abbreviation.
- Comments discuss the relevance of the topics to different monitoring
contexts, highlight possible key indicators and discuss methodological
issues.
7 LSMS surveys
8 WCA 2010
Page 1
1 Contents
Notes
- Whilst an effort has been made to provide comprehensive coverage of
relevant initiatives and proposals, no guarantee can be made that all relevant
data collection initiatives and indicator proposals are represented. This
publication may be revised in the future to take account of changes and new
information.
- This publication assumes a very broad definition of indicator in order to
encompass usage across a wide range of initiatives. Many maybe properly
regarded as data items or variables. In some cases, evaluation questions
have been listed alongside indicators.
- Whilst an effort has been made to be comprehensive, some indicators from
some initiatives have been left out where they appeared to be beyond the
scope of this publication.
Page 2