Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
by:
Kate O'Connor
This essay offers a very basic introduction to feminist literary theory, and a compendium of
Great Writers Inspire resources that can be approached from a feminist perspective. It provides
suggestions for how material on the Great Writers Inspire site can be used as a starting point for
exploration of or classroom discussion about feminist approaches to literature. Questions for
reflection or discussion are highlighted in the text. Links in the text point to resources in the
Great Writers Inspire site. The resources can also be found via the ' Feminist Approaches to
Literature' start page . Further material can be found via our library and via the various authors
and theme pages.
The 'Feminine' Phase - in the feminine phase, female writers tried to adhere to
male values, writing as men, and usually did not enter into debate regarding women's place in
society. Female writers often employed male pseudonyms during this period.
2.
The 'Feminist' Phase - in the feminist phase, the central theme of works by female
writers was the criticism of the role of women in society and the oppression of women.
3.
The 'Female' Phase - during the 'female' phase, women writers were no longer
trying to prove the legitimacy of a woman's perspective. Rather, it was assumed that the
works of a women writer were authentic and valid. The female phase lacked the anger and
combative consciousness of the feminist phase.
Do you agree with Showalter's 'phases'? How does your favourite female writer fit into these
phases?
French Feminism
French Feminism, led by critics such as Julia Kristeva, Hlne Cixousx, and Luce Irigaray, relies
heavily on Freudian psychology and the theory of penis envy
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penis_envy ). French feminists postulate the existence of a
separate language belonging to women that consists of loose, digressive sentences written
without use of the ego.
How does Jane Austen fit into French Feminism? She uses very concise language, yet speaks
from a woman's perspective with confidence. Can she be placed in Showalter's phases of
women's writing?
Dr. Simon Swift of the University of Leeds gives a podcast titled 'How Words, Form, and Structure
Create Meaning: Women and Writing' that uses the works of Virginia Woolf and Silvia Plath to
analyse the form and structural aspects of texts to ask whether or not women writers have a
voice inherently different from that of men (podcast part 1 and part 2).
In Professor Deborah Cameron's podcast English and Gender , Cameron discusses the differences
and similarities in use of the English language between men and women.
In another of Professor Paul Fry's podcasts, Queer Theory and Gender Performativity , Fry
discusses sexuality, the nature of performing gender (14:53), and gendered reading (46:20).
How do more modern A-level set texts, like those of Margaret Atwood, Zora Neale Hurston, or
Maya Angelou, fit into any of these traditions of criticism?
What are the different problems faced by a wealthy character like Austen's Emma, as opposed to
a poor character like Bront's Jane Eyre ?
FEMINISM IN LITERATURE
Overview
Feminism has gradually become more far-ranging and subtle in its attacks on male-dominated society.
Many injustices still need to be corrected, but equally necessary is a more down-to-earth, tolerant and
compassionate view of fellow human beings.
Introduction
Many feminists dislike theory. Sharp intellectual categories, argumentation, seeming objectivity, and
the whole tradition they grow out of are just what feminists are seeking to escape. And if their
reasoning seems unsystematic they can draw support from the psychoanalysis ofLacan and Julia
Kristeva, from Derrida's deconstruction, and from Rorty's view that philosophy should model itself on an
edifying conversation seeking rapprochement rather than no-holds-barred gladiatorial combat. {1}
Androgynist Poetics
Critics, being generally male, had not generally concerned themselves with gender issues. Most of the
world's great literature had been written by men. Sappho, Austen, the Bronts and Emily Dickinson
apart, it was difficult to think women really had it in them to write at the highest level. Literature was
literature, and critics saw no need to distinguish a specifically feminine way of writing or responding to
a text.
Virginia Woolf was herself a refutation of that thesis, though her mental breakdown was perhaps
brought on by the strain of balancing male self-realization with female abnegation. But in her
essay Professions for Women, Woolf complained only that women's social obligations hindered a writing
career. Their lives gave them a different perspective, but women were not fundamentally different
from men in their psychological needs and outlooks.
Gynocriticism
The gathering feminist movement very much disagreed, and argued that women's writing expressed a
distinctive female consciousness, which was more discursive and conjunctive than its male
counterpart. Such consciousness was radically different, and had been adversely treated. Simone de
Beauvoir in The Second Sex documented the ways "Legislators, priests, philosophers, writers and
scientists have striven to show that the subordinate position of women is willed in heaven and
advantageous on earth." Women had been made to feel that they were inferior by nature and, though
men paid lip-service to equality, they would resist its implementation. Some men might be sympathetic
to women's issues, but only women themselves knew what they felt and wanted. {2}
And perhaps they always knew. The essays collected in Susan Cornillon's 1972 anthology Images of
Women in Fiction all suggested that nineteenth and twentieth century fiction was simply untrue to
women's experience. Rather than search for the essentially feminine, critics now turned to the social
context of women's writing, to the ways a male-orientated society had formed or deformed individual
novels, plays and poems written by women. Adventure and romance, whoever written for, seemed to
stress the male competitive element, and even the submissive partner of gay literature only imitated
the female stereotype.
Not all agreed, of course. Norman Mailer's The Prisoner of Sex: disliked the blanket criticism of Kate
Millet's Sexual Politics, arguing its examples were too selective chosen. {3}
Gynesis
Nonetheless, by the early eighties, feminists had advanced to a much more confrontational attack on
male hegemony, advocating a complete overthrow of the biased (male) canon of literature. French
feminists argued that women should write with a greater consciousness of their bodies, which would
create a more honest and appropriate style of openness, fragmentation and non-linearity. Parallel
studies in the visual arts stressed a feminine sensibility of soft fluid colours, an emphasis on the
personal and decorative, and on forms that evoked the female genitalia.
And the problem lay deeper still, in the language itself. Words had been coined to express a male point
of view, and that was indeed misogynist. Some 220 words exist in English for the sexually promiscuous
woman, but only 22 for promiscuous men. And in the sexual matters that really concerned them, the
vocabulary was hopelessly restricted. {4} Discourse was power, said Foucault, and psychoanalysts
likeLacan and Kristeva stressed the liberating role that literature should play, particularly to allow the
semiotic flux of the unconscious in early childhood, i.e. before the symbolic world of public discourse
imposed its male-favouring rules. Poets worked on the boundaries of the two realms, and Kristeva
urged them to engender political and feminist revolutions by dissolving the conventions of normal
discourse.{5}
Gender Theory
Five years later the debate had moved on, from exclusively feminine concerns to the wider issues of
gender in social and cultural contexts. Patriarchy and capitalism should be examined more closely,
perhaps as Althusser had attempted, and sophisticated models built to integrate the larger web of
economics, education, division of labour, biological constraints and cultural assumptions.
Michle Barrett demanded facts, research. How does gender stereotyping arise in various social
contexts? How are the canons of literary excellence actually established? What is the practical effect
on literature? Shouldn't we remember that attitudes are struck within a fictional framework, and can't
be simply pulled out and convicted by a kangaroo court of feminist morals? {6}
Critique
Literature will often reflect the cultural assumptions and attitudes of its period, and that of course
includes attitudes towards women: their status, their roles, their expectations. But a literature
doctored of male-orientated views would be failing in its first requirement, to present a realistic or
convincing picture of the world. Moralizing, which includes political correctness, has its dangers.
Feminists have argued for positive discrimination as the only way to correct centuries of bias.
Nonetheless, the consensus emerging among black Americans is that positive discrimination is counterproductive. Disadvantaged minorities desperately need the odds levelled, but not patronizingly tilted
in their favour. {7}
Psychoanalysis has little scientific standing, and Lacanian theory is further disputed within the
psychoanalytical community itself. Feminism does itself few favours by relying on these supports.
A more damaging criticism is the concept of the feminine itself. Does it really exist? There are very real
differences in the psychological make-up between the sexes, {8} but testing also indicates what
anthropologists have long accepted: the expression of those differences is more determined by cultural
factors than sexuality per se. Feminists who argue for a more understanding, fluid, and delicate
attitude are not so much advocating qualities native to women but for attitudes still repressed by
society. That in turn suggests society itself needs exploring rather than sex differences per se, which is
indeed a view more recognized in contemporary feminist studies. {9}
References
1. Chapter 6 of Raman Selden's A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory (1985,
1989),Feminist Criticism entry in David Cooper's (Ed.) A Companion to Aesthetics (1995).
2. Cooper 1995, and Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex (1974).
3. Kate Millet's Sexual Politics (1977), Gayle Green and Susan Gubar's The Madwoman in the Attic: The
Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination (1979).
4. pp. 376-384 in Jessie Bernard's The Female World (1981).
5. Toril Moi's Sexual/Textural Politics: Feminist Literary Theory (1985), Helene Cixous's The Laugh of
the Medusa (1976), and Dale Spender's Man-Made Language. For psychoanalytical aspects see Juliet
Mitchell's Psychoanalysis and Feminism (1975), Elizabeth Wright's (Ed.) Feminism and
Psychoanalysis(1992) and Toril Moi's The Kristeva Reader (1986).
6. Michele Barrett's Women's Oppression Today: Problems in Marxist Feminist Analysis (1980), Judith
Newman and Deborah Rosenfelt's (Eds.) Feminist Criticism and Social Change: Sex, Class and Race in
Literature and Culture (1985), Elaine Showalter's (Ed.) The New Feminist Criticism: Essays of Women,
Literature and Theory (1985), Hester Eisenstein's Contemporary Feminist Thought (1984), Christine
Battersby's Gender and Genius: Towards a Feminist Aesthetics (1989, 1994), and Ann Garry and Marilyn
Pearsall's Women, Knowledge and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy (1989).
7. Bernard 1981, and Janet Radcliffe Richards's The Sceptical Feminist: A Philosophical Enquiry (1980).
8. Donald Symmons's The Evolution of Human Sexuality (1979).
9. Miriam Lewin's (Ed.) In the Shadow of the Past: Psychology Portrays the Sexes (1984) and Janet
Spence and Robert Helmreich's Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates,
and Antecedents (1978), Sarah Dunant's The War of the Words: The Political Correctness Debate (1994)
and Miln Mac an Ghaill's Understanding Masculinity (1996).
Internet Resources
1. Feminist Theory An Overview. Elizabeth Lee.
1997.http://www.victorianweb.org/gender/femtheory.html. Short article in The Victorian Web.
2. Feminism and Canons. Cynthia Freeland. Jan. 1999.http://www.uh.edu/
%7Ecfreelan/courses/femcan.html. A survey of the movement through topic headings.
3. How Feminism Is Re-writing the Philosophical Canon. Charlotte Witt.
1996.http://www.uh.edu/~cfreelan/SWIP/Witt.html. Essay outline outlining implications.
4. Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797). Garth Kemerling. Aug.
2002.http://www.philosophypages.com/ph/woll.htm. Short article, references and links.
5. Julia Kristeva. May 2003. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Kristeva. Wikipedia entry, with links.
6. Hlne Cixous. Mary Jane Parrine. 1998. http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/cixous/index.html.
Lectures, articles, bibliography and links.
7. Feminisms and Gender Studies. http://www.eng.fju.edu.tw/
Literary_Criticism/feminism/index.html. Notes and listings relating to feminism and literature.
8. Topics in Feminism. Sally Haslanger and Nancy Tuana. Feb.
2003.http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-topics/. Detailed article with excellent bibliography
and listings.
9. Feminism and Women's Studies. http://eserver.org/feminism/index.html. Slow site but extensive
resources, including online texts.
10. Women's Studies Resources. Karla Tonella. Jan. 2003. http://bailiwick.lib.uiowa.edu/