MEGAT AMIRUL AZRIN BIN MEGAT ZULKAFLI

2014222852

DISCUSSION
Comparison for graph for y versus ( u/U ) at 0.05 m
Based on the graph by reffering the value for smooth plate, the maximum value at 2.75
for 0.578907 u/U. From this graph, we can see that the constant value for smooth plate at
0.578907 u/U from 2.00 until 2.75. For the minimum value is 0.457666 u/U at 0 point of y.
This value can be accepted because the value has repeat parameters at five times with
continously. In the smooth plate, we can see the pattern of result continously increasing.
Another graph is rough plate. Based on this graph we can analysis the maximum value
is 0.569789 u/U at 2.75. Other than that, the minimum value is 0.457666 u/U at point 0 of y.
Then, from this graph we also can know the value of rough surface smaller than smooth
surface for the maximum value and same minimum value. This value can be accepted because
the value has repeat parameters at five times continously. In the rough plate, we can see the
pattern of result also continously increasing.

Comparison for graph for y versus ( u/U ) at 0.2 m

Based on the graph by reffering the value for smooth plate, the maximum value at
2.75 for 0.620662 u/U. From this graph, we can see that the constant value for smooth plate
at 0.620662 u/U from 1.75 until 2.75. For the minimum value is 0.485193 u/U at 0 point of y.
This value can be accepted because the value has repeat parameters at five times with
continously. In the smooth plate, we can see the pattern of result continously increasing.
Another graph is rough plate. Based on this graph we can analysis the maximum value
is 0566584 u/U at 2.75. Other than that, the minimum value is 0.485193 u/U at point 0 of y.
Then, from this graph we also can know the value of rough surface smaller than smooth
surface for maximum and same value for minimum. This value can be accepted because the
value has repeat parameters at five times continously. In the rough plate, we can see the
pattern of result also continously increasing.

MEGAT AMIRUL AZRIN BIN MEGAT ZULKAFLI

2014222852

Comparison for graph for y versus ( u/U ) (1-u/U) at 0.05 m

Based on the graph by reffering the value for smooth plate, the maximum value at 0
for 0.248208 (u/U)(1-u/U). From this graph, we can see that the constant value for smooth
plate at 0.248208 (u/U)(1-u/U) from 1.75 until 2.75. For the minimum value is 0.243774
( u/U)(1-u/U) at 2.75 point of y. This value can be accepted because the value has repeat
parameters at five times with continously. In the smooth plate, we can see the pattern of result
continously decreasing.
Another graph is rough plate. Based on this graph we can analysis the maximum value
is 0.249863 (u/U)(1-u/U) at 0.75. Other than that, the minimum value is 0.245129 (u/U)(1u/U) at point 2.75 of y. Then, from this graph we also can know the value of rough surface
slightly bigger than smooth surface for minimum and maximum value. This value can be
accepted because the value has repeat parameters at five times continously. In the rough plate,
we can see the pattern of result also continously decreasing.

Comparison for graph for y versus ( u/U ) (1-u/U) at 0.2 m

Based on the graph by reffering the value for smooth plate, the maximum value at
0.25 for 0.249954 (u/U)(1-u/U). From this graph, we can see that the constant value for
smooth plate at 0.235441 (u/U)(1-u/U) from 1.75 until 2.75. For the minimum value is
0.235441 (u/U)(1-u/U) at 2.75 point of y. This value can be accepted because the value has
repeat parameters at five times with continously. In the smooth plate, we can see the pattern of
result continously decreasing.
Another graph is rough plate. Based on this graph we can analysis the maximum value
is 0.249985 (u/U)(1-u/U) at 0.75. Other than that, the minimum value is 0.245567 (u/U)(1u/U) at point 2.75 of y. Then, from this graph we also can know the value of rough surface
bigger than smooth surface when maximum and minimum value. This value can be accepted
because the value has repeat parameters at five times continously. In the rough plate, we can
see the pattern of result also continously decreasing.

MEGAT AMIRUL AZRIN BIN MEGAT ZULKAFLI

2014222852

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we can conclude that we can see the pattern for graph y versus u/U
between smooth plate and rough plate is always increase. Beside that, from graph y versus
(u/U)(1-u/U) we also can analyze the parameter of (u/U)(1-u/U) is always decrease. From this
graph we can define the boundary layer of flat plat in laminar or turbulent flow. Moreover,
some errors might be occured during the experiment. As the error prevention methods, data
measured problem can be prevented by ensuring that the eye must be in line or perpendicular
to the scale to get an accurate reading. Moreover, the apparatus should undergo maintenance
time by time to provide the best result. From the discussion, we know the experiment can
achieved objective or not. Lastly, the experiment the objective totally succesfully achieved
and the experiment can be acceptable.