Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Isps
Isp and enterprise
Extended acl:
Access-list
[ name/num ]
[ permit/deny/remark ]
[ tcp/udp/protocol/protocol no]
[ any/source/host/ipadd/object group ]
[ destination host/ipadd/object group/any ]
ebgp-multihop 5 means that neighbor 131.108.10.2 can be only five hops away from R1, and the Time To
Live (TTL) field in the IP header is set to 5.
update-source Loopback0 means that all BGP updates are sourced from the Loopback 0 address of R1. R2
uses 131.108.10.1 as the next-hop address for all routes learned through R1.
Bgp backdoor:
> When a router learns a prefix via two paths, one via eBGP and the other via IGP, the eBGP route based on the
AD(20) will be chosen as the best.
> This might not always be the required best route.
> The AD of that one route could be changed or the BGP backdoor feature could be used, which makes the IGP
route the preferred route.
Route dampening:
Designed to reduce router processing load caused by unstable routes.
- Each time an eBGP route flaps, it gets 1000 penalty points (this cannot be configured or changed).
- iBGP routes are not dampened.
- Benefits of using Peer-Groups
> Reduce the amount of system resources (CPU and memory) necessary in the update generation.
> Mostly used to simplify large repeating BGP configurations.
The main purpose of route reflectors and confederations is not to prevent loops but to avoid the need to
have all iBGP routers fully meshed (fully peered in BGP).
The route reflector design is usually preferred to confederations. It is a relatively lightweight solution that
scales nicely. Confederations are usable only for huge autonomous systems where you can afford to split
them into several sub-ASes. Note that each sub-AS in a confederation needs to have its internal iBGP
peers either fully meshed, or use route reflection internally, returning back to the route reflector concept. As
you can see, the confederations are not much of an advantage for small ASes having a few BGP routers.