100%(2)Il 100% ha trovato utile questo documento (2 voti)
1K visualizzazioni41 pagine
The Supreme Court is reviewing a decision by the Court of Appeals regarding a dispute over whether the developer of a subdivision from 1966 is required to provide an open space area. The Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board to determine a specific land area for open space. The petitioner claims the Court of Appeals erred in several ways, including assuming jurisdiction when it belonged to the Office of the President, not finding the homeowners association lacked legal personality, and ruling that Presidential Decree 957 requiring open spaces applies retroactively when no such retroactive provision exists.
The Supreme Court is reviewing a decision by the Court of Appeals regarding a dispute over whether the developer of a subdivision from 1966 is required to provide an open space area. The Cou…