Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Spending in Pakistan
Submitted To:
Batch:
MBA (E8&E9)
Submission Date:
Submitted By:
Wajid Ali
Rana Tassadaq
Maryam Asghar
Naila Khaild
Managerial Economics
Page 1
3335
3316
3284
3288
ABSTRACT
This research work has been carried out to measure the tendency of government spending on
health in Pakistan at provincial level i.e., both rural and urban using the primitive data of the
Pakistan Social Standard Living Measures Survey, 2013-14, and by exercising the three-step
Benefit Incidence Approach (BIA) methodology. The study examines the national policies
stressing health services as well as the direction in access to and public sector spending on
health care facilities in Pakistan. The study investigates the disparities in resource allotment
and service terms against the government health outlays. The rural areas of Pakistan are the
more deprived in terms of the health care facilities. The outlays in health areas are as a whole
are backwards in rural Pakistan as well as at provincial and regional levels. Mothers & Child
subhead is retrogressive in Punjab and General Hospitals and Clinics are retrogressive in all
provinces. Only the Hygienic Measures and health facilities sub-sector is advanced in
Pakistan. Public health outlays are pro-rich in Pakistan.
Page 2
questionable. The epidemic ailments are still a threat and the statistics unveil that the nutrition
and reproductive health dilemmas in epidemic ailments are still answerable for the 58% of
the BOD in Pakistan. Non-infectious ailments caused by sedentary life style, environmental
pollutions, delicate dietary habits, smoking etc. account for almost 10% of the BOD in
Pakistan. Social Policy Development Centre expresses that out of every 1,000 kids who
endure infancy, 123 expire before attaining the age of five. A huge size of those who
surviving suffers from malnutrition leading, to diseased immunity and higher insecurity to
infections. Malnutrition is big problem in Pakistan. Human Conditions Report (2013) clearly
points out that about 40 percent kids under 5 years of age are malnutrited. Nearly 50% of
deaths of kids under 5 year old kids are because of malnutrition.
LITERATURE REVIEW
An ample review of the literature, researched facts & figures, papers and evaluation
narrations is performed to weigh the existing condition and policy contest. This consists of
documents and reports accessible from World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations
Childrens Fund (UNICEF), Asian Development Bank (ADB), and Centre for Poverty
Reduction & Income Distribution (CRPRID), Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) and
Ministry of Health (Islamabad).
A huge number of the studies have exercised the Benefit Incidence Approach (BIA) on
household data for their examinations. Findings unveil that public sector outlays are either
progressive or regressive and the share of the different income group differs depending upon
the delivery of the gains of the public outlays across region, caste, religions, gender etc.
Few points require further consideration; the first point about the impact of the level of public
outlays on human proficiencies is a debated point, as not all studies have found a hypothetical
link between the two. The relation between richly addressing poverty issues and spending is
not first and foremost a function of the percent of GDP that is promised to total spending on
health and, but depends on the intra-sectorial allocation to health spending. Evidence reveals
that infant and child mortality rates become minimal in countries with high shares of health
care spending assigned to primitive (preventive) health care facilities. Second, the fiscal
policy-makers address head-on the nature and consequences of fiscal tendency. The policy
choices obligate the understanding about which groups are tend to pay for and which groups
are predicted to gain more from public sector outlay. Policy-developers have many questions
regarding how to relive the load of taxation for the poor and about how to multiply the
efficiency and validity of the public sector spending on health? How to mark public spending
for the purpose of improving the circumstances of the poor? The directions of analysis
provide little critical information to favor policy-makers concerning balanced distribution of
income and betterment of efficiency and validity of the public policy.
Enough literature is accessible to understand the questions concerning the nature of tendency
of the public sector expenditures in developing and developed nations. Much of the
researches have been carried out on previous data-sets gathered from household surveys that
have not been revised or updated. These studies are inadequate in contrast of tendency among
the cross countries on one side & in-comparability of the cross country outcomes on the other
side. Likewise, the impact on different groups such as sex and region has not been taken into
account in the case of Pakistan. Furthermore, the literature regarding the tendency of the
public sector expenditures and its distribution in Pakistan is hardly accessible.
Managerial Economics
Page 3
The present study is being initiated to explore the nature of tendency of public sector outlays
in Pakistan on health sector by using the primitive data of the Pakistan Social & Living
Standards Measurement Survey, gathered and published by the Federal Bureau of Statistics,
Pakistan. By using existing data, the prevailing researches highlights the current story line of
tendency of the public spending on health and circuitously provide the guideline to what limit
health policy targets have been victoriously accomplished, who gain how much, which type
of disparities exist in distribution of gains of government expenditures on health, region and
income wise.
Managerial Economics
Page 4
The total public sector expenditures as percentage of GDP expresses that the public spending
on health sector has improved to 0.40 percent in 2013-14 from 0.35 percent of the GDP in
2010-2011; in last some years, i.e. after being a signatory to the United Nations Millennium
Declaration in the year 2000, the progress was just 0.30 percent of GDP. Excitingly, there was
only a change of 0.23 percent of GDP between 2010-11 and 2012-13. Furthermore, the public
sector development expenditures as percentage of GDP reveals worst picture over the same
period of time; improvement of 0.05 percentage points. These percentages are far less and
below those recommended by the WHO.
According to a report by WHO Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, USD 34 per
capita is required for a package of fundamental health services in Pakistan. Nevertheless, the
overall expenditures on health in Pakistan are USD 18 per capita out of which the total
government health expenditure is USD 4 per capita. This makes clear how much the
government is committed to invest in the health sector, particularly for the deprived that do
not bear private consultation.
The percentage distribution of the government health expenditures by sector reveals that of
the total public sector budgetary expenditures in 2013-14 on health, 65.32 percent was spent
on general hospitals and clinics, 30.37 percent on health facilities and preventive measures,
and only 4.31 percent on mother and child health care facilities. Although, the percentage
share of mother and child health care became more than doubled since 2010-11, but it is still
insignificant believing the medical facilities needed particularly for unserved population
living in urban slums and rural areas.
Pakistans health care system is insufficient, inefficient, and much expensive; and involves an
underfunded and incompetent public sector along with a combined, expensive and
unregulated private health sector. These bad conditions in the health sector may be referred to
a number of reasons like poverty, malnutrition, uneven access to health facilities, inadequate
grant for health, and high population growth & infant mortality. For fairness, efficacy and
effectiveness of the health sector, inputs from both the public and private sector would be
essential.
Conclusion
Managerial Economics
Page 5
(1) Pakistans health care system is insufficient, inefficient, and much expensive; and
involves an underfunded and incompetent public sector along with a combined, expensive
and unregulated private health sector. These bad conditions in the health sector may be
referred to a number of reasons like poverty, malnutrition, uneven access to health facilities,
inadequate grant for health, and high population growth & infant mortality. For fairness,
efficacy and effectiveness of the health sector, inputs from both the public and private sector
would be essential.
(2) The outlays in health sectors are overall progressive in Pakistan while it is regressive in
some sub-head outlays of health at provincial and regional levels.
(3) The assumption that spending on health is on-going at provincial and regional level is
thrown away as the results found great disparities and unevenness across regions.
(4) Third assumption that there exist large disparities in the shares of the different quintiles in
health outlays cannot be thrown away or rejected.
(5) As a whole, the public sector spending on health sector is to some extent progressive in
Pakistan.
(6) Public sector outlays in Preventive Measures and Health Facilities sub-sector are
progressive at provincial and regional level, excluding overall rural Pakistan. It means the
public sector spending on Preventive Measures and Health Facilities are more justly
distributed as compared to the income distribution. Expenditures on Preventive Measures and
Health Facilities are highly subsidized by the federal government in Pakistan through its
vertical programs.
(7) The poor in Pakistan is not only deprived of financial means but also lack reach to
secondary and tertiary health care services. Public outlays in General Hospitals and Clinics
sub-sector of health are retrogressive in most of the regions in Pakistan.
(8) Health outlays on Mother and Child sub-sector is on-going in Sindh, KPK and in overall
Pakistan; that refers that poor are getting more gains from these outlays as compared to the
rich. But in-kind subsidies are regressive in Punjab. The Mother and Child are the most
disadvantages and neglected sub-sector of health.
(9) The rural urban disparities are deeper. The rural areas are more derivate zones underlining
the health care facilities. In health sector more disparities prevails in the share of the lower
and upper quintiles in government outlays on health care facilities.
(10) In the terms of health care services the private sector plays a key role. According to the
PSLM (2012-13) survey, 77% households consult the private sector against only 23% to the
public sector.
Managerial Economics
Page 6