Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Organic Electronics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/orgel
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 16 June 2014
Received in revised form 3 September 2014
Accepted 15 September 2014
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Titanium (Ti) wires
TCO-less
Coil type cylindrical dye-sensitized solar
cells (C-DSSCs)
TiO2
H2O2 treatment
a b s t r a c t
This paper reports a comparative study of the photovoltaic characteristics of titanium (Ti)
metal wires with different diameter and surface treatments towards their utilization as
photoanodes for coil-based dye-sensitized solar cells. The surface property of the Ti wire,
especially oxidized overlayer and surface treatments have been found to greatly inuence
the adhesion as well as optimum electrical contact between coated nanoporous titanium
oxide (TiO2) and Ti-wires. Implication of adhesion of nanoporous TiO2 on the titanium wire
and its inuence on photovoltaic performance was analyzed using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Results of X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy reveals the formation of anatase TiO2 nanosheets after the H2O2
surface treatment on the titanium wire resulting into enhancement in the extent of dye
loading leading to enhanced photoconversion efciency of 4.71% under simulated solar
irradiation.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Ever increasing world population, standard of human
life and depleting precious fossil fuel reserves compel us
to look for immense solar energy harvesting to meet with
the huge future energy demands. Solar cells are one of
the potential means to harness this solar energy directly
into usable electrical energy. Major part of current solar
cell industry depends mainly on solid-state devices prepared from silicon and compound semiconductors. However, due to the reasons such as high cost of fabrication
and high purity requirement limited its growth as compared to fossil fuels. Next generation solar cells based on
mesoscopic titanium oxide (TiO2) due to its high chemical
stability, nontoxicity, low cost and corrosion resistance is
one of the attractive alternatives to silicon photovoltaic
Corresponding authors.
E-mail addresses: gauravkapil.ece@gmail.com (G. Kapil), hayase@life.
kyutech.ac.jp (S. Hayase).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.09.023
1566-1199/ 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: G. Kapil et al., Titanium wire engineering and its effect on the performance of coil type cylindrical dye
sensitized solar cells, Org. Electron. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.09.023
Please cite this article in press as: G. Kapil et al., Titanium wire engineering and its effect on the performance of coil type cylindrical dye
sensitized solar cells, Org. Electron. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.09.023
Ti Wire/ Nanoporous
TiO2 / Dye
e-
e-
IGlass Tube
Ti/Pt
I3 -
Glass mesh
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram for the fabrication and electron transport in TCO-less C-DSSC.
Please cite this article in press as: G. Kapil et al., Titanium wire engineering and its effect on the performance of coil type cylindrical dye
sensitized solar cells, Org. Electron. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.09.023
Fig. 2. SEM images for Ti wires (a) as-received (b and c) after mechanical polishing and (d) after H2O2 surface treatment.
circuit current density (Jsc) of 3.82 mA/cm2 and open circuit voltage (Voc) of (0.60 V) leading to lowest photoconversion efciency. This might be associated with the
surface impurities which are present on the wire surface
(as TiOx) seen through different SEM images obtained after
polishing the surface in Fig. 2(a) and (b). The surface impurity leads to poor adhesion and improper contact (necking)
between coated nanoporous TiO2 on the wire surface hindering the electron transport and enhancing the charge
recombination.
To explain the different Jsc values observed for cylindrical photoanodes based on Ti-wires with varying diameters,
photocurrent action spectra (IPCE as function of wavelength) was also measured. The change in value of Jsc for
these different photoanodes are in accordance with
observed IPCE as shown in Fig. 4(b). The maximum value
of IPCE was observed at the wavelength about 550 nm
(absorption maximum for N-719 on TiO2) demonstrating
that the observed photocurrent is the result of photoexcited electron injection from the dye N-719 to the conduction
band of TiO2 followed by the electron transport. The differential behavior of observed Jsc for different photoanodes
could be either due to different extent of recombination
or contribution from extent of dye molecules attached on
the nanoporous TiO2 coated on the Ti-wire surfaces. To
clarify these aspects, estimation of dye loading was performed, which indicates almost similar amount of dye
adsorption for all of the four photoanodes as summarized
in Table 1. Therefore, the differences in recombination
could be one plausible explanation for the observed Jsc values as a function of wire diameter. A careful analysis of
Table 1 indicates that observed performance of solar cells
are mainly controlled by ll factor (FF), which is directly
affecting the solar cell efciency. The reason for better ll
factor of Ti_100 than Ti_57 could be due to decrease in
resistance of Ti_100, which is contributed from increased
Please cite this article in press as: G. Kapil et al., Titanium wire engineering and its effect on the performance of coil type cylindrical dye
sensitized solar cells, Org. Electron. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.09.023
Fig. 4. (a) Photo and dark currentvoltage characteristics and (b) photocurrent action spectra for C-DSSCs based on photoanodes with Ti-wires of varying
diameters.
Table 1
Photovoltaic and EIS parameters for C-DSSCs based on cylindrical photoanodes fabricated using Ti-wires of different diameters.
Eff (%)
FF
Voc (V)
Jsc (mA/cm2)
Dye loading (nmol/cm2)
R1 (X)
R2 (X)
R3 (X)
Ti_57NT
Ti_57
Ti_100
Ti_150
1.03
0.45
0.6
3.82
322.66
25.97
56.43
2433
3.06
0.59
0.62
8.39
319.4
24.94
42.99
105.5
4.04
0.64
0.65
9.74
321.74
14.48
15.89
71.82
1.93
0.47
0.57
7.13
332.83
12.48
50.18
128.5
Fig. 5. EIS spectra for C-DSSCs measured at AM 1.5 and constant Jsc of
1 mA cm2.
Please cite this article in press as: G. Kapil et al., Titanium wire engineering and its effect on the performance of coil type cylindrical dye
sensitized solar cells, Org. Electron. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.09.023
Efciency (%)
FF
Voc (V)
Jsc (mA/cm2)
Dye loading (nmol/cm2)
Fig. 6. Schematic representation for implication of TiOx surface impurities on Ti wire surface resistance and electron transport with large (a) and
small (b) TiOx layer.
of (0 0 2) peak for Ti_150 clearly indicates for the availability of largest amount of TiOx when compared with Ti_57
and Ti_100, hence less pure Ti surface. Therefore, results
pertaining to the differences in intensity of main (0 0 2)
peak of pure sputtered Ti (hexagonal closed packed phase)
[20] relative to (1 0 1) peak conclude for differential
amount of surface oxidized impurities or TiOx on wire surface. Similar kind of observations has been made by Rajesh
Ti_57HP
Ti_100HP
Ti_150HP
3.35
0.51
0.61
10.87
356.88
4.71
0.58
0.65
12.58
365
3.05
0.65
0.65
7.23
372.09
Fig. 8. High-resolution XPS spectra of the Ti 2p peaks for Ti_100, Ti_150 and Ti_100HP.
Please cite this article in press as: G. Kapil et al., Titanium wire engineering and its effect on the performance of coil type cylindrical dye
sensitized solar cells, Org. Electron. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.09.023
Fig. 9. (a) Photovoltaic characteristics and (b) photocurrent action spectra for C-DSSC fabricated using 100 lm Ti-wire before and after the H2O2 surface
treatment.
diameter or surface area of wire the effect is more prominent and surprisingly most effective for 150 lm (58.03%
increase in efciency). However, due to large surface area
and formation of relatively larger extent of TiOx could be
attributed to hinder towards the attainment of best solar
cell efciency using Ti_150HP as compared to Ti_57HP
and Ti_100HP.
Fig. 9 exhibits the comparative photovoltaic characteristics for 100 lm Ti wire (Ti_100) based C-DSSC before
and after the H2O2 treatment (Ti_100HP) for which we
have the best photovoltaic performance. Fig. 9(a), clearly
corroborates that Jsc is the main contributing factor for
increased photoconversion efciency of 4.71% from 4.04%
since Voc and FF are not being affected appreciably. To
explain the enhanced Jsc value observed for cylindrical coil
based TCO-less photoanodes utilizing 100 lm Ti-wire
before and after the H2O2 surface treatment, photocurrent
action spectra was also measured as shown in Fig. 9(b). It
can be seen that peak IPCE value have increased from
around 55% to 65% at about 550 nm wavelength and is
attributed to the enhanced Jsc of H2O2 treated Ti-wire.
One of the possible reason for the enhanced Jsc could be
due to enhanced dye loading since wire surface area was
found to be increased by anatase TiO2 nanosheet like
microstructures which is in direct contact with the nanoporous TiO2 layer utilized for the dye adsorption [24]. To
conrm this assumption, extent of dye adsorbed was also
estimated and shown in Table 2. Increase in the dye loading from 321 (Ti_100) to 365 (Ti_100HP) nmol/cm2 upon
H2O2 surface treatment veries the increase in Jsc and IPCE
values.
4. Conclusion
In summary, it has been shown that surface properties
of the Ti wires play an important role in controlling the
performance of C-DSSCs. Investigations pertaining to the
EIS revealed that extent of TiOx surface impurities varies
with the diameter of the wire which is responsible for
the variable adhesion of coated nanoporous TiO2 and Ti
wires. This variable amount of TiOx as function of wire
diameter was further probed by XRD and XPS investigations also. Solar cell performance rst increased from
57 lm Ti wire to 100 lm and then decreased with further
increase in diameter to 150 lm. C-DSSCs fabricated with
photoanode utilizing mechanically polished Ti wire exhibited a considerable enhancement in solar cell efciency
from 1.03% to 3.06%. H2O2 surface treatment further
improved the photoconversion efciency from 4.04% to
4.71%, which is due to the formation of anatase (A-101)
nanosheet like structures enhancing surface area and good
contact assisting the enhanced dye loading and facile
charge transport, respectively.
References
[1] N. Vlachopoulos, P. Liska, J. Augustynski, M. Gratzel, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 110 (1988) 12161220.
[2] S. Ito, T.N. Murakami, P. Comte, P. Liska, C. Gratzel, M.K. Nazeeruddin,
M. Gratzel, Thin Solid Films 516 (2008) 46134619.
[3] Y. Kashiwa, Y. Yoshida, S. Hayase, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (2008) 033308.
[4] X. Fan, Z. Chu, F. Wang, C. Zhang, L. Chen, Y. Tang, D. Zou, Adv. Mater.
20 (2008) 592595.
[5] Z. Lv, Y. Fu, S. Hou, D. Wang, H. Wu, C. Zhang, Z. Chu, D. Zou, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 (2011) 1007610083.
[6] Y. Liu, H. Wang, H. Shen, W. Chen, Appl. Energy 87 (2010) 436441.
[7] K. Onoda, S. Ngamsinlapasathian, T. Fujieda, S. Yoshikawa, Sol.
Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 91 (2007) 1176.
[8] J. Usagawa, S.S. Pandey, Y. Ogomi, S. Noguchi, Y. Yamaguchi, S.
Hayase, Prog. Photovoltaics: Res. Appl. 21 (2013) 517.
[9] G. Kapil, J. Ohara, Y. Ogomi, S.S. Pandey, T. Ma, S. Hayase, RSC Adv. 4
(2014) 22959.
[10] H.G. Yun, Y. Jun, J. Kim, B.S. Bae, M.G. Kang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93
(2008) 133311.
[11] Z. Lv, J. Yu, H. Wu, J. Shang, D. Wang, S. Hou, Y. Fu, K. Wu, D. Zou,
Nanoscale 4 (2012) 1248.
[12] J. Yu, D. Wang, Y. Huang, X. Fan, X. Tang, C. Gao, J. Li, D. Zou, K. Wu,
Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6 (2011) 94.
[13] T.-Y. Tsai, C.-M. Chen, S.-J. Cherng, S.-Y. Suen, Prog. Photovoltaics:
Res. Appl. 21 (2013) 226231.
[14] C.H. Lee, W.H. Chiu, K.M. Lee, W.F. Hsieh, J.M. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. 21
(2011) 51145119.
[15] J. An, W. Guo, T. Ma, Small 8 (2012) 34273431.
[16] Y.C. Lim, Z. Zainal, W.T. Tan, M.Z. Hussein, Int. J. Photo. 2012 (2011)
638017.
[17] K. Thamaphat, P. Limsuwan, B. Ngotawornchai, Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.)
42 (2008) 357361.
[18] H. Choi, C. Nahm, J. Kim, J. Moon, S. Nam, D.R. Jung, B. Park, Curr.
Appl. Phys. 12 (2012) 737.
[19] M. Kim, I.K. You, K.W. Lee, I.H. Lee, H.G. Yun, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102
(2013) 183904.
[20] N. Arshi, J. Lu, C.G. Lee, J.H. Yoon, B.H. Koo, F. Ahmed, Bull. Mater. Sci.
36 (2013) 807812.
[21] D. Rajesh, C.S. Sunandana, Indian J. Phys. 86 (2012) 681686.
[22] B. Erdem, R.A. Hunsicker, G.W. Simmons, E.D. Sudol, V.L. Dimonie,
M.S. El-Aasser, Langmuir 17 (2001) 26642669.
[23] P.M. Kumar, S. Badrinarayanan, M. Sastry, Thin Solid Films 358
(2000) 122130.
[24] S. Ushiroda, N. Ruzycki, Y. Lu, M.T. Spitler, B.A. Parkinson, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 51585168.
Please cite this article in press as: G. Kapil et al., Titanium wire engineering and its effect on the performance of coil type cylindrical dye
sensitized solar cells, Org. Electron. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.09.023