Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
What is a Project?
An individual or collaborative enterprise that is
carefully planned and designed to achieve a
particular aim
EXAMPLES:
constructing a new road
building a ship
designing and marketing a new product
moving to a new office block
installation of a computer system.
Due Date!
Meet the
Deadline--schedule
Stay within
the budget
Meet the
specifications
Management of Projects
Planning - goal setting, defining the project, team
organization
Scheduling - relates people, money, and supplies to
specific activities and activities to each other
Controlling - monitors resources, costs, quality, and
budgets; revises plans and shifts resources to meet
time and cost demands
Scheduling
Objectives
Project activities
Resources
Work break-down
schedule
Network
Organization
Controlling
Monitor, compare, revise, action
Project Planning
Establishing objectives
Defining project
Creating work breakdown
structure
Determining
resources
Forming organization
Project Organization
Often temporary structure
Uses specialists from entire company
Permanent
structure called
matrix organization
A Sample Project
Organization
President
Human
Resources
Marketing
Project 1
Project 2
Finance
Design
Quality
Mgt
Production
Mechanical
Engineer
Test
Engineer
Technician
Electrical
Engineer
Computer
Engineer
Technician
Project
Manager
Project
Manager
The Role of
the Project Manager
Highly visible
Responsible for making sure that:
All necessary activities are finished in order and on
time
The project comes in within budget
The project meets quality goals
The people assigned to the project receive
motivation, direction, and information
Concept
Planning
Execution
Closure
Management
Feasibility
Project Scheduling
Identifying precedence relationships
Sequencing activities
Determining activity times & costs
Estimating material and worker
requirements
Gantt Charts
Shown as a bar charts
Do not show precedence relations
Visual & easy to understand
Network Methods
Shown as a graphs or networks
Show precedence relations
More complex, difficult to understand and costly
than Gantt charts
Developed in 1950s
CPM by DuPont for chemical plants (1957)
PERT by Booz, Allen & Hamilton with the
U.S. Navy, for Polaris missile (1958)
6.
Constant-Time Networks
Activity times are assumed to be constant
Activities are represented by Arcs in the network
Nodes show the events
Notations used in calculating start and finish times:
ES(a) = Early Start of activity a
EF(a) = Early Finish of activity a
LS(a) = Late Start of activity a
LF(a) = Late Finish of activity a
(a)
A
(b)
Activity
Meaning
C
B
A comes before B,
which comes
before C
Activity on
Arrow (AOA)
B
(c)
A
C
B and C cannot
begin until A is
completed
B
A
C
Rules
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Prerequisites
Dig hole
Position tree
Fill in hole
EET1 = 0
EETj = max{EETi + dij}
(i,j)A
j=2,,n
i=n-1,,1
Slack = LS ES
or
Slack = LF EF
Example
Precedence and times for Opening a New Office
Activity
A
Description
Lease the site
Immediate
Predecessors
D, E
F, G
A, B
Description
Lease the site
Hire the workers
Arrange for the furnishings
Install the furnishings
Arrange for the phones
Install the phones
Move into the office
Inspect and test
Total Time (weeks)
Time (weeks)
2
3
2
4
4
3
5
2
25
C
(Arrange for
the
furnishings)
Dummy
Activity
D
(Install the
furnishings)
H
(Inspect/
Test)
Earliest
Start
Latest
Start
A
ES
EF
LS
LF
Earliest
Finish
Latest
Finish
Activity Duration
EF = ES + Activity time
EF of A =
ES
ES of A + 2
of A
A
0
0
2
2
0
Start
13
2
8
13
15
2
0
Start
10
7
13
E
LF = Min(LS
of following
4
8
activity)
13
13
LS = LF
D Activity time
3
15
15
13
LF = EF
of Project
Slack = LS ES
or
Slack = LF EF
Earliest
Start
ES
0
0
2
3
4
4
8
13
Earliest
Finish
EF
Latest
Start
LS
Latest
Finish
LF
Slack
LS ES
2
3
4
7
8
7
13
15
0
1
2
4
4
10
8
13
2
4
4
8
8
13
13
15
0
1
0
1
0
6
0
0
On
Critical
Path
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
0
0
Start
10
0
1
7
13
13
13
13
13
15
15
ES EF Gantt Chart
for Opening a New Office
1
10
11 12 13 14
C
D
E
F
G
H
15 16
Pessimistic time
Time required under worst conditions
Probabilistic Estimates
Beta Distribution
to
Activity
start
Optimistic
time
tm
te
Most likely
time (mode)
tp
Pessimistic
time
Expected Time
te
t
+
4t
+t
o
m
p
=
6
te = expected time
to = optimistic time
tm = most likely time
tp = pessimistic time
Variance
2
2
(t
t
)
= p o
36
2 = variance
to = optimistic time
tp = pessimistic time
Optimistic
time
Pessimistic
time
Most likely
time
1-2-3
(C)
Dummy
Activity
2-4-6
(D)
1-2-3
(H)
Computing Variance
Optimistic
Most
Likely
Pessimistic
Expected
Time
Variance
Activity
t = (a + 4m + b)/6
[(b a)/6]2
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
2
1
2
1
1
3
1
2
3
2
4
4
2
4
2
3
4
3
6
7
9
11
3
2
3
2
4
4
3
5
2
.11
.11
.11
.44
1.00
1.78
1.78
.11
Probability of Project
Completion
Project variance is computed by
summing the variances of critical
activities
s2p = Project variance
= (variances of activities
on critical path)
Probability of Project
Completion
Project variance is computed by summing
the variances of critical activities
Project variance
2p = .11 + .11 + 1.00 + 1.78 + .11 = 3.11
Project standard deviation
p =
=
Project variance
3.11 = 1.76 weeks
Probability of Project
Completion
Standard deviation = 1.76 weeks
15 Weeks
(Expected Completion Time)
Probability of Project
Completion
What is the probability this project can be
completed on or before the 16 week
deadline?
Z=
due
date
expected date
of completion
/p
Probability of Project
Completion
From Appendix I
.5
.6
expected date
Z=
date .69497
of completion
.69146
.71566 /s
.71904
p
.72575
.72907
.74857
.75175
Probability of Project
Completion
Probability
(T 16 weeks)
is 71.57%
15
Weeks
16
Weeks
Time
Advantages of PERT/CPM
1. Especially useful when scheduling and controlling large
projects
2. Straightforward concept and not mathematically complex
3. Graphical networks help highlight relationships among
project activities
4. Critical path and slack time analyses help pinpoint
activities that need to be closely watched
5. Project documentation and graphics point out who is
responsible for various activities
6. Applicable to a wide variety of projects
7. Useful in monitoring not only schedules but costs as well
4.
2
3
2
4
4
3
5
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
Cost ($)
Normal
Crash
22,000
30,000
26,000
48,000
56,000
30,000
80,000
16,000
22,750
34,000
27,000
49,000
58,000
30,500
84,500
19,000
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Crash
$34,000
Crash
Cost
Crash Cost/Wk =
$33,000
$34,000 $30,000
31
$4,000
=
= $2,000/Wk
2 Wks
=
$32,000
$31,000
$30,000
Normal
Cost
Figure 3.16
Normal
|
1
Crash Time
|
2
|
3
Normal Time
Time (Weeks)