Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Individual Assignment
Submitted To
Saripalli bhavani Shankar
For the partial fulfillment of the course
Submitted by
Barleen Kaur
2013PGP093
Contents
ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................................2
ANALYSIS OF THE GIVEN SITUATION..............................................................................2
PROFILE OF PARTICIPANTS.................................................................................................3
METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS.......................................................................................3
THEORIES TO GUIDE THE ANALYSIS................................................................................5
EXPECTATION FROM THE STUDY......................................................................................6
RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................7
REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................7
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the assignment is to examine the consumer perception and factors
that make up for the brand choice towards domestic and international brands.
Design/methodology/approach: In-depth interviews, Focus group discussions, shopping
trips are the three methods of inquiry in this research.
Research expectations: Mangers shall be cognizant of the consumer relationship with the
brand and thus shall be mindful of the strategies in future.
Profile of participants
Because few studies guide the consumer perception about domestic and international tablets
in India, a qualitative research oriented approach shall be suitable to solve the research
problem. To recruit the participants a snowball sampling technique can be used to recruit
the participants for FGD and interviews. For shop-along convenience technique will be best
suited. Among other factors such as social class, age and sexuality can also help provide
insights about the research. Therefore the informant pool can be restricted to men and women
of the age 20-40(major decision makers of purchase of tablets), who are avid purchaser of
technology products and decent knowledge about tablet computers. Another set of
participants can be of the same age group and different social class, but their knowledge
about tablets may not be given much of participants.
As three methods are being used the ranking of the criterion also form the basis summarized
in the table below. Using the constant comparison method (Glaser and Strauss, 1967), the
respondents shall be selected in such a way that there is maximum contrast between the
two. This would provide a richness of data and also the perspectives difference shall
provide rich insights. Furthermore, this technique shall ensure the contrasting perspectives
would provoke disconfirmation of theories and researches done earlier wherever possible.
Profile of the
participants
Decreasing order of
preference for the
Choice
In-Depth interview
Focus Groups
Shop-alongs
Personal
Characteristics
Location
Location
Personal
Characteristics
from the third. Subsequently, the respondent shall be asked which of the two groups of
mobile phones tablets shall be preferred and the reason for this choice. Kellys (1955)
personal construct theory and the use of laddering technique shall prove to be resourceful for
ascertaining the emotional reasons for preference of one brand over the other, and getting
past the more obvious cognitive ones (Neimeyer et al., 2001). By asking the respondent to
say which two mobile tablets and their brands were similar and which he or she preferred,
valuable insight could be found about the values of the respondent and how these were
reflected by the brand in the research. Some of the supportive questions that shall be helpful
during the picture comparison are as listed below:Q1. What similarity or difference you find between the images?
Q2. What other products of the same brand have you owned before? Or currently owning?
What was your experience with those gadgets?
Q3. Do you think its an international brand/domestic brand? What made you come to such
conclusion? You prefer to carry an international brand or Indian brand? What is the reson?
Does being seen with international brand carry any meaning in your life style? what could
that be, can you elaborate?
Q4. Why Dont use WHY in questioning do you think its an international/domestic brand?
Q5. How you did first came to know about the product / brand?
Q6. When you went to shop were you certain about the product choice? If not what / who
influenced your decision?
These questions can be laddered down to know the real answer from the respondent.
Approach during the focus group discussion: A similar approach is intended for the focus
group discussion but laddering shall not be done. In addition, ?? Picture shall be shown and
the participants shall be asked to make a comparison. At the end of the FGD the participants
shall be given a sheet with 8 tablet devices and their brands (4 domestic and 4 global(as per
the Nielsen definition)) and the participants shall be asked to rate those brands. This shall
help us to logically quantify our results. There will be two researchers in the focus group
discussion in order to ensure internal validity of the data of research.
During the shop-along the focus shall be to observe the actions of the participants. How the
stimuli is making an impact on the participant. Videography of the same can be made and
later the transcript can be studied to compare the results of the two No by shooting the
consumers shopping behaviour you will completely influence it, instead joining him for
the trip and finding out the reasons for the choices he made what he / she was thinking
when making that choice can be asked later.. Shop along may become necessary to
administer as the views of the shopper shall be administered without the purchase intent
being clearly depicted. At the point of sale, actions speak louder than wordsand the
discrepancy between preferences and purchases adds yet another level of complexity to the
attitudes toward brands.
This information thus obtained shall be collected and the interviews are recorded and
transcribed. The transcripts are prepared, coded, labelled and analyzed using the
method of constant comparison to find common patterns. The codes evolved inductively
as one transcript was compared to the next. The codes shall be re-evaluated and refined as the
cross analysis progresses. Rather than concerning the relevant ideas and themes to descriptive
level. Effort shall be made to extend them to a very abstract preference criteria (for instance
dealing with the image of the brand).
Also the ranking derived at the end of the focus group discussion can be used to judge
the coherence between the say and working of the participants. Frequency count of the
constructs can also be done to ascertain the significance and the impact of the constructs to
the respondents. As per a study by Fransella and Bannister,1987, the number of times a
construct is mentioned it depicts the relevance of the construct to the individual.
Another study by Julie Schoenfelder and Phil Harris,2004 the following transcript was
designed. Please see the bullet points are just examples. The author had tried to compare the
various relations and tried to build the theory of corporate brands.
Based on the response and the date obtained the three theories can be tested and the necessary
additions or deletions can be made from the same.
This part of the analysis shall be sufficient to give answer to question on determining the
factors determining the brand choice.
To the first research question in order to understand the perception of the consumers towards
the domestic and international brand there are not many frameworks available earlier. By the
keywords-in-context/construct count a better picture can be realized about the same.
Once you put all this literature from the papers, you are also supposed to finally say that you
are going to use some of these constructs for your research and how they will fit, which ones
you would like to drop for better understanding. Just by placing them here you are making
the reader to connect the dots..
Would the brands benefit from a chameleon strategy? How can the marketers position their
brand with respect to the competitors?
If a brand is perceived as local, how can consistency be ensured with their global positioning?
Are their any specific benefits of positioning the product as local brand or a marketing
resources?
Does the product as per the consumer perception meet their needs
Do consumers who consider us a local brand expect different things from our productssuch
as lower prices or particular flavors? Do we understand how to meet their needs?
Recommendations
In respect of the drafts designed above the recommendations to the marketeersmarketers and
other stakeholders related shall be as follows:Design of the point of sale artefacts as per the consumer perception
Consumers have a very complex pattern of making decision and choices, Brands and their
identity play an important role in guiding their decision. Marketers must understand the
components of the attitude and also their relation to the behavioural intentions.
Antecedents of attitudes, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control shall be exerted
based on the results derived. Good
References
[1] Maria Merino, ITAM Mexico, Silvia Gonzalez, ITESM Mexico(2010), Perception of
global brands in Latin America
[2] Foreign or local brands in China?, Boston Consulting Group
[3] Kelly, G.A. (1955), The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Norton, New York, NY.
[4] Fransella, F. and Bannister, D. (1987), A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique, Academic
Press, London.
[5] Neimeyer, R.A., Anderson, A. and Stockton, L. (2001), Snakes versus ladders: a
validation of laddering technique as a measure of hierarchical structure, Journal of
Constructivist Psychology, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 85-105.