A Generation

Adrift
The case for speech, language and
communication to take a central
role in schools policy and practice

A Generation
Adrift

The case for speech, language and

communication to take a central
role in schools policy and practice

Introduction.............................................................................................. 5
The good news ........................................................................................ 6
The context .............................................................................................. 9
So, whats the problem? .....................................................................10
Falling behind matters ........................................................................12
Missed, misinterpreted, misunderstood .........................................14
Whats going wrong? ...........................................................................16
Whats needed? ....................................................................................18
Making it happen ..................................................................................26
References ..............................................................................................28

Introduction

Communication is at the core of what

we do in business, education and
socially. Never before in our history
have we been able to communicate
as quickly and widely as we can
today. Theres no doubt we know
good communication when we see
it; individuals who can articulate their
thoughts and ideas, can use their
language to explain new concepts
or describe their experiences. They
can really listen and understand
other perspectives and can hold an
audience, regardless of who and how
many.
At the foundation of all
communication is language words,
which are made up of sounds,
constructed and combined into
sentences with meaning and used
to interact with those around us. This
is the same whether we are talking,
listening, writing, reading, texting,
e-mailing or sharing information
on Twitter or Facebook. In essence,
communication is being able to listen
and talk to each other in order to
connect; to structure our thoughts
and transform them into a medium
that allows them to be shared. The
foundation of all communication is
human language and although its
easily taken for granted, its the most
complex skill we will ever learn.
Bearing in mind the importance of
communication in todays society,
surely we want our young people
to develop the stongest language
and communication skills they are
capable of?

The foundation of all communication

is human language and although its
easily taken for granted, its the most
complex skill we will ever learn.
The sad reality is this isnt happening.
According to employers, even our
graduates lack the communication
skills needed for the workplace
and at the other end of the scale
too many children are struggling
to develop basic language and
communication as they progress
through their educational journey.
These children have speech, language
and communication needs (SLCN).
Currently they arent being identified
early or well enough and arent
being supported to develop their
communication skills - impacting on
progress and prospects.
The long term impact of SLCN
is well documented; impact on
attainment, progression and wider
social, behavioural and emotional
outcomes. We know for example,
children with SLCN are at higher risk
of exclusion from school1 and that
60-90% of young people in the youth
justice system have SLCN, many
of which arent identified before
offending.2 3
Language is complex; multifaceted
and multilayered and children can be
very good at hiding their language
difficulties, showing other symptoms
that are more tangible, recognisable
or easier to understand poor
literacy, poor behaviour, low self
esteem and few friendships.

Supporting language and knowing

when children are struggling is not
hugely difficult; often its a tweak
to good practice, meshed with basic
knowledge of language development.
Its the questions we ask ourselves
about why children are struggling
combined with the reflective practice
common to all good practitioners.
We need to understand the language
we can expect at different ages and
stages and we need to know how
we can adapt our own language to
ensure children and young people
are understanding whats being
said, to show them how to use their
language for learning and to ensure
we are identifying and supporting all
those children who are struggling.
This paper aims to bring together
the evidence around why we must
focus on speech, language and
communication skills, which are
important in their own right and as a
vehicle for learning, social interaction,
inclusion and independence, for
all children and young people and
particularly for those who have SLCN.
It also highlights the fact that these
skills can be supported and aims to
provide a call to action to achieve this
with practical, evidenced solutions.

A Generation Adrift

The good news

talk at home, in school, among peers is education at its most elemental and
potent. It is the aspect of teaching which has arguably the greatest influence on
learning. Cambridge Primary Review, 2009

In many schools, the majority

of children (around 90%) come
into school with well developed
language and communication
skills. Before starting school, they
have experienced good quality
and quantity of talk from the
adults around them. Theyve had
opportunities for lots of practice to
talk, listen and understand, to hone
their language and communication
skills.
These children usually have clear
speech, a good vocabulary, age
appropriate grammar and narrative
skills. They can have conversations
and are able to listen well and
understand whats said to them
by both peers and teachers. They
can interact both to socialise and
to facilitate and develop their own
learning and can communicate what
they know and dont know. They can
use their language to think and can
express their ideas clearly, confidently
and courteously.
In some UK classrooms, teachers
capitalise on these skills. They use
good quality and quantity of talk in a
way that models more sophisticated
language for learning and scaffolds
childrens language (building on
childrens language from their
starting point). They weave talking
and listening opportunities into
the fabric of their lessons, they ask
why and shift their language to
accommodate the most and least
able children in the class.

A Generation Adrift

In these classrooms, children

with speech, language and
communication needs (SLCN) can
access learning at their level, the
language used by the teacher acts
as a route to learning, rather than
a barrier. Teachers who take this
approach know the language level at
which their pupils are functioning and
take responsibility for ensuring they
understand what they are taught.
These teachers have clear
expectations of what they want
children to learn. They teach children
how to listen, attend and focus on
key information; they consistently
highlight and revisit key vocabulary
and ensure children understand; they
create a learning environment where
seeking clarification is valued and
celebrated. They give clear structures
for spoken language contributions;
they model what it looks like to think
and to reason in order to learn; to
use language for solving problems; to
interact in groups; they make thought
processes explicit to the children
and show how conclusions can be
reached. They are aware of their
pupils levels of language and adapt
their own language accordingly.

All children and young people

would benefit from talk being an
integral element occupying a prime
position in teaching and learning
across subjects and throughout
the curriculum. A focus on talk in
the classroom can significantly
enhance the way all children respond
to schooling, in all subjects.4 Talk
is the vehicle for all learning and
the gateway to literacy skills if
children cant say a sentence or
explain a concept, they will struggle
to understand or express it through
reading or writing.
We also know much about what
supports children who are struggling
and the barriers that prevent them
getting that support. The recent
landmark Better Communication
Research Programme (BCRP) was
able to highlight interventions and
approaches that are effective for
children and young people with SLCN.5
Adults in educational settings play a
key role in supporting spoken language
and the development of a classroom
learning environment which fosters
language for thinking and learning.6
Strong and knowledgeable school
leaders can make a real difference
to children as they progress through
school.

A focus on talk in the classroom can

significantly enhance the way all
children respond to schooling, in all
subjects.

A Generation Adrift

The context
It is a skill which has to be taught, honed and nurtured. Yet childrens ability to
communicate, to speak and understand [is] taken for granted
Bercow Report, 20087

There have been some positive

changes since John Bercow MP carried
out his review in 2008 which found a
fundamental lack of understanding of
communication, alongside a national
inequity of provision and support for
children with speech, language and
communication needs (SLCN).
Communication has a growing
presence in national policy,
particularly in education policy:

D Language and communication is

now one of the three core strands

of the early years foundation
stage8

D Recommendations made by

the Nutbrown Review of early

years education, highlighted
the importance of a qualified
workforce in the early years who
understand how to develop
young childrens language skills9

D Both the Allen Review of Early

Intervention10 and the Fields

Review of the Foundation Years11
made made clear that language
and communication development
at age 3 was one of the major
National Life Chances Indicators
for children

D Communication has a strong

position in the new Ofsted

inspection framework, both in
relation to teaching and learning
and with a focus on those children
who dont attain well

D The Education Select Committee

on Behaviour and Discipline in

Schools made very powerful
recommendations around the link
between SLCN and behaviour

D The Primary National Curriculum

Expert Panel concluded that

spoken language should be
a strong feature of any new
National Curriculum and
dedicated a chapter of their report
to it

D The secondary curriculum

now includes elements of

communication within specific
subject areas, as well as English

D There is a focus on language in

the Department of Health Healthy

Child Programme and 2 year
check

However, there continues to be a way

to go to ensure policy reflects other
necessary changes:

D Systematic initial and continued

professional development for

teachers to support knowledge
and skills of speech, language and
communication and SLCN

D Continued need for a graduated

response to support all

childrens speech, language and
communication

D Accurate profiling and careful

monitoring of progression for
children with SLCN in schools

D Integrated service provision of

speech and language therapy
services

Through Hello, the national year

of communication (2011),12 there
has been a shift in awareness
of communication. The national
campaign, with support from
more than 200 local co-ordinators,
supported parents, teachers and
other professionals to gain a greater
understanding of the issue. The Hello
evaluation demonstrated positive
changes in the understanding of the
issue, though there remains a long
way to go.13
There remains a need to translate
the positive changes seen in national
policy to equal shifts in local practice
as currently there is a very large gap
between the two. Both research
and anecdotal feedback from grass
roots professionals stress the huge
challenges that remain in ensuring
children with SLCN are identified
and supported through local service
provision.

 ommunication
C
has a strong
position in the
new Ofsted
inspection
framework.

D Real joined up policy for children

with SLCN / Special Educational

Needs as outlined in the
forthcoming Children and Families
Bill

A Generation Adrift

So, whats the problem?

Communication disorders will be a major public health concern for the 21st
century because, untreated, they adversely affect the economic well-being of a
communication-age society. Ruber, 200014

In some areas of
deprivation, more than
50% of children start
school with SLCN.
There are shockingly large numbers
of children in the UK struggling to
acquire language. Many of these
children arent being accurately
identified or supported. Identification
is key across all phases of education.
These children can be difficult to
identify and may have complex
needs, so an ongoing focus is
absolutely imperative. The impact of
SLCN cuts across the whole of their
development; learning, attainment,
behaviour, self esteem, inclusion,
independence and long term life
prospects.

10

A Generation Adrift

10% of all children have

long-term SLCN.

We know from national figures that

by the time they reach five years
of age, (the end of the Early Years
Foundation Stage) more than a third
of children are not working securely
in communication, language and
literacy. In deprived areas, this
number rises to more than four in
ten.15

We know that 50%16 of children in

areas of social disadvantage start
school with poor language, with
language that isnt adequate for the
next stage of learning, for thinking,
reasoning and communicating
effectively with adults and peers.
For example, children from low
income families lag behind by
nearly one year in vocabulary at
school entry, with gaps in language
much larger than gaps inother
cognitive skills.17 These children
are at a disadvantage from the
start and without the right support
dont catch up with their peers.18 A
recent CBI report highlighted that
children who are failing to achieve
adequate standards in primary
education come disproportionately
from disadvantaged backgrounds. 19
Children need language to learn.

7% of all children have

a specific language
impairment.
Theres a significant group of children
who have a rich communication
experience, with lots of support
from parents, though despite
this will have a specific language
impairment.20 7% of all children have
a specific language impairment;
its the most prevalent childhood
disability, but a condition that
is much misunderstood. These
children also start school without
the language they need in order to
learn and are disadvantaged from
the start. Children within this group
have differing needs, dependent
on the nature and severity of their
difficulties. They need specialist
support in order to learn and
communicate to the very best of their
ability.

1% of all children have

severe and complex
SLCN.

At least 3% of all children have

SLCN linked with other impairments,
including those with hearing
impairment, autistic spectrum
disorders, specific learning difficulties,
such as dyslexia and general learning
needs. In fact, the majority of
children with SEN have some degree
of SLCN. They too need support in
order to learn and to communicate to
the very best of their ability.

So, the problem is the scale of the

issue, both in quantity of children and
the impact of SLCN; most children
with SEN have SLCN, some children
have specific language imapairments
and around half of the children in
areas of social disadvantage can have
SLCN. Language difficulties impact
across all areas of development and
on longer term prospects. Children
need language to learn, socialise, to
manage their behaviour and develop
emotionally.

A Generation Adrift

11

Falling behind matters

Language has critical importance for

learning and wider development,21
however, many children are starting
school already behind, with evidence
to suggest that without the right
support, they dont catch up. Falling
behind really does matter; it can
affect self-esteem, behaviour and
engagement with education.22
Good spoken language skills are
strong predictors of later academic
success. Children with poor language
and literacy development at 5
years are at substantial risk of
low achievement at 7 years23 and
beyond.24 Good spoken language
predicates reading and writing,25 26
with literacy gaps often widening as
children progress through school. 27

Research tells us that early

vocabulary and concept development
is especially critical for children
from low and moderate income
homes,28 with vocabulary at age 5 a
strong predictor of the qualifications
achieved at school leaving age and
beyond.29 Major recent research
shows language impairment as
a risk factor for low achievement,
with language difficulties important
factors for predicting attainment
on Key Stage 1 and 2 English and
Maths national curriculum tests.30
Research has also shown older pupils
experiencing greater levels of need
than those identified at younger
ages.31 At the end of Key Stage
4, the attainment gap between
children with speech, language and
communication needs (SLCN) and
their peers is marked. Just 15% of
young people with SLCN achieve 5
GCSE A*- C or equivalent compared
to 57% of all young people.32 As the
most prevalent childhood disability,
this adds up to a lot of children.

Falling behind really does matter; it

can affect self-esteem, behaviour
and engagement with education.

However, language plays more than

just an underpinning role for the
acquisition of literacy and academic
attainment. Its also important for
the wider outcomes we want for
our young people. Talk and social
interaction play a key role in all
childrens social development.33
Language is the vehicle for organising,
problem-solving, managing and
evaluating experiences, influencing
and informing; all crucial skills for the
classroom and beyond.34
Language ability can also impact
massively on behavioural and
emotional development;35 even in
early development, language levels
directly impact on self-regulation
skills of children and therefore on
their behaviour.36 We know many
children with SLCN have significant
behavioural difficulties, some of
which mask underlying impairments
in language.37 Others are withdrawn,
which means theyre less likely to
start conversations, are more likely
to play alone and research suggests
theyre less liked by others in their
class. These social, emotional and
behavioural components can impact
massively on children and young
people, meaning poorer long term
social outcomes.38
The good news is that we know many
approaches that work in supporting
children with SLCN, mitigating
against the long term impact of not
understanding or being understood.
We know from evidenced approaches
and interventions what can make a
difference. However, there remains
some way to go in translating this
knowledge into every day practice.

12

A Generation Adrift

A Generation Adrift 13

Missed, misinterpreted,
misunderstood
Missed
Although numbers of children and young people identified in schools
with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN) as their
primary need has increased by around 70% over the last 6 years,
there remain true challenges.39 Despite internationally accepted
prevalence figures of 7%, only 3% of the school population is ever
identified as having SLCN.40 Children are being missed.
Identification of SLCN still challenges professionals, with continued
variability in age and process of identification continuing
throughout the school years.41 Research found parent concern
alone or even in combination with professional screening
insufficiently reliable as an indicator of need.42 43 Exacerbating this
issue is the fact that the terminology used to describe, diagnose or
categorise children is often used inconsistently across disciplines
and services and there remains a lack of clarity about whats
meant by SLCN.
Despite committed and experienced staff, current policy and
practice isnt enabling consistent identification of all children with
SLCN, far from it. In The Communication Trusts Talk of the Town
programme, an average of around 40% of children were not being
identified; most difficult to spot were older students, students who
had difficulties with vocabulary (45% not identified), those who
struggled with formulating sentences (52% not identified) and
children with difficulties understanding (29% not identified). 48%
in Key Stage 3 were not identified. This, despite a highly committed
staff team.44

Misinterpreted
Children and young people with SLCN often have academic,
emotional and behavioural difficulties that pose a challenge
to the professionals working with them.45 SLCN can be difficult
to spot and the nature of the difficulties can change over time,
often becoming more complex.46
Ofsted have also reported examples of childrens SLCN being
misinterpreted; some children and young people were allocated
support for their behaviour when, in fact, they had specific
communication needs.47

14

A Generation Adrift

Case study
James was referred to speech and
language therapy when he was 10
years old. The school believed he
was either dyslexic or had learning
difficulties. He was a quiet, hard
working member of the class; he
could read fluently and accurately, but
couldnt understand what he had read.
His language assessment showed
his understanding of vocabulary and
grammar to be on the first percentile;
his understanding of language was
extremely poor. James was extremely
bright and had become adept at hiding
his significant language impairment.

Misunderstood
The Better Communication Research Programme (BCRP) research
indicates strongly that national curriculum data and/or establishing
a pupils primary need provides insufficient information to plan
services and differentiate the curriculum. The research highlights
the fundamental importance of profiling and monitoring childrens
needs, rather than providing support by diagnosis or category,
which can result in challenges of identification and issues regarding
meeting the changing nature of children and young peoples
needs.48 49

The best people, they understand

the nature of my condition - Id
say that was the most important
thing.
A Generation Adrift

15

Whats going wrong?

there is grossly inadequate recognition across society of the importance of
communication development, let alone the active steps needed to facilitate it.
Bercow Report, 200850

High quality classroom talk is a key

factor in improving pupil engagement
and outcomes.51 We know that
just the way in which teachers
talk to children and young people
can influence learning, memory,
understanding and the motivation
to learn.52 Research has shown that
the quality of spoken dialogue in
primary classrooms can significantly
improve childrens educational
attainment, from increasing SAT
scores in Maths and Science, to
improving reading comprehension,
writing and reasoning skills.53
Despite this strong raft of evidence,
high quality classroom talk is not
the norm. A criticism in the recent
Crossroads report is that talk is rarely
planned and developed explicitly in
classrooms.54 Language continues to
have a low profile in our schools and
education policy. Why is this?
Language isnt immediately tangible.
Its the least taught and trained for,
yet is the most used skill. Although
a truly cross curricular vehicle for
learning, spoken language currently
sits predominantly in the Literacy
curriculum, though is given less focus
than the written word, both within
the curriculum and with the training
and development of teachers and
other professionals. A recent report
by the Centre for Social Justice
recommended a key performance
indicator should be introduced for
communication competency in
primary schools.55

16

A Generation Adrift

Terminology
The term speech, language and
communication needs (SLCN) is
defined and used in different ways
by different people; i.e. schools plasc
data use SLCN to refer to children
with primary speech, language
and communication needs those
with specific language impairment.
Conversely, The Bercow Review
uses SLCN as an umbrella term to
include all and any children with
SLCN, including children with other
impairments or learning needs. In
practice, specialist and generalist
practitioners use the terms in
different ways.
There can be miscommunication
and inconsistency of services as
a result; currently services tend
to be diagnosis led, which raises
challenges when diagnostic labels
are misunderstood and inconsistently
used.
In current policy, varied terms
are used that relate to speech,
language and communication skills;
for example, articulacy,56 oracy57
and communication skills.58 Whilst
they may be essentially referring
to the same skills, these different
terms are open to a wide range of
interpretation, which could lead to
inconsistency and confusion and
dilute the potential for transforming
the way that pupils communication
skills are developed in schools.

High quality
classroom talk
is a key factor in
improving pupil
engagement and
outcomes.

Workforce development
Children with SLCN need support at
all levels, in the classroom as well as
by specialists. Children are very clear
about what works for them other
peoples behaviour and understanding
is paramount.59 However, theres a
need for workforce development,
both in initial training and as continual
professional development (CPD) as
children with SLCN can and do fall
through the gaps in professional
knowledge and in the system.
There remain huge challenges for
teachers and other practitioners in
effectively identifying and supporting
children and young people with SLCN.
Particular challenges for teachers
are in changing classroom practice,
with research showing the need for
systematic professional development.
Teachers themselves express a lack
of confidence in knowing how to
support children and young people
with SLCN.60
Often, lessons are dominated by
teacher talk which rarely improves
spoken language or enhances
learning.61 Four decades ago, the
Bullock Report62 calculated that
pupils had on average a 20 second
window to each contribute verbally in
a 45-minute lesson. Recent research
suggests things have not greatly
improved. One survey of secondary
schools in an inner city identified
adults talking for up to 90% of the
time63 and more recent research
put the average length of a pupils
contribution to class discussion at just
four words.64 Research has indicated
that variations in the quality and
quantity of the language that children

experience in their homes65 and

educational environments66 strongly
influence individual differences in the
rate of childrens language growth
and later language outcomes.
In a recent report, Ofsted found
new teachers didnt have a solid
knowledge of language development
and struggled to adapt their own
language for those children with
poor language skills. The need for
high quality training during initial
teacher education in these areas was
highlighted as important in order to
support teachers to do this.67

Case study
The Communication Trust has
developed Lets Talk About
It, an information booklet
available to all initial teacher
trainees, available from www.
thecommunicationtrust.
org.uk/resources. The Trust
has worked with a group of
universities to embed speech
and language information into
initial teacher training and is
currently working on a project
with a university and a primary
school within a co-operative
learning trust, using a targeted
intervention programme to
embed changes in practice of
initial teacher trainees.

Services and support

Children and young people with
SLCN not only fall through the gaps
in professional expertise but also in
how support is paid for and delivered.
Prevention and early identification
need as much consideration as
specialist services for those children
and young people with identified
SLCN. Health and education need
to work together to design and
commission needs-led local services
considering universal as well as
targeted and specialist approaches.
However, there remain challenges
in joint planning locally for children
and young people with SLCN due to
increasing evidence of significant cuts
to front line speech and language
therapy services68 and to the
specialist advisory teaching services.69

A Generation Adrift

17

Whats needed?
Schools which turn the dial on language and communication are able to turn the
dial on a number of key school improvement priorities, from raising attainment to
narrowing the gap and improving behaviour.
Jean Gross, Communication Champion, 201170

We know that communication is

paramount for our children, we
know that there is much room for
improvement, but we also know
what we need and have examples of
excellence in practice.

School leadership
Time and time again, evidence shows
the impact having top level support
has for any programme running in
schools, in particular the backing
of the headteacher and senior
leadership team.71 The importance
of leadership in spearheading
language policy across a school is
shown in recent Ofsted reports. The
reports have identified the role of the
headteacher and the establishment
of a whole school approach as key
principles for success.72
Effective practice in speaking
and listening has regularly been
highlighted as a key feature of
outstanding schools in a number of
national reports:A common feature
of the most successful schools in the
survey was the attention they gave to
developing speaking and listening.73

Case study
Peacehaven Community
School is a specialist science,
maths and training school
for pupils aged 11-16. The
senior management team has
prioritised speech, language
and communication in the
School Improvement Plan.
They won the Shine A Light
award for Secondary School of
the Year in 2012.

Workforce development
The Expert Panel for the National
Curriculum Review acknowledges
the need for professional
development in order to ensure
effective implementation of oracy
in the classroom 74 with teachers
themselves acknowledging the
same for children with speech,
language and communication needs
(SLCN).75 Research also points to the
need for more training in order for
teachers to support language, given
the wide range of SLCN issues that
they typically face in mainstream
schools.76 In addition, there needs
to be careful consideration of the
professional development of teaching
assistants who are four times more
likely to support speech and language
therapists in delivering interventions
than to teachers.77
There are a number of initiatives
available to schools that support
teaching staff to develop their
pupils speech, language and
communication skills and better
identify and support pupils with SLCN;

18

A Generation Adrift

staff can identify their professional

strengths and needs and be
signposted to appropriate continued
professional development.78

Case study
The Trusts Speech, Language
and Communication
Framework (SLCF) is a tool
designed for the childrens
workforce. Teachers and other
practitioners can complete
an audit of their knowledge
and skills. Theyre then given
a profile of their strengths
and areas they may want
to develop, with practical
solutions. Many of The Trusts
Consortium members offer
short and accredited courses
and consultation services to
support schools.79
More than 10,000 people have
used the SLCF, almost 8,000 of
which were universal staff. For
more information please go to
www.talkingpoint.org.uk/slcf

Ensuring high quality language

teaching and learning should
reduce the numbers of children
and young people who require
specialist language support. Where
individual children fail to respond
to systematic and regular exposure
to evidence based oral language
interactions, additional assessments
of individual children may be needed
and interventions, if appropriate,
embedded within the educational
context to meet the childs needs.80

Conversations between adults and

children that are characterised
by high quality language learning
interactions should be the core of the
classroom.

20

A Generation Adrift

Language in the curriculum

Classroom environment

Experts have long argued that

language is so fundamental to
learning that it deserves a higher
profile across the whole curriculum
rather than being marooned in
the English curriculum,81 as the
poor relation to written language.
The Expert Panel for the National
Curriculum Review devotes a
whole chapter to the issue of Oral
Language and its Development
within the National Curriculum
noting the connection between oral
development, cognitive development
and educational attainment. 82

Effective talk in the classroom has

reported positive effects on subject
learning, attainment, understanding,
students control over their own
learning, emotional development,
confidence and self-esteem.84 Social
interaction and class-based activities
such as working to achieve joint
goals, explaining thinking, discussing
different points of view and forging
consensus, promote both learning
and understanding.85 Conversations
between adults and children
characterised by high quality language
learning interactions should be the
core of the classroom. A classroom
may have an exemplary physical
environment and a deliberate provision
of daily language activities; however,
without adult-child interactions of
sufficiently high quality and sensitivity,
these efforts are unlikely to result in
the desired child outcomes. A number
of studies suggest these language
learning interactions occur less
frequently than is needed. 86 87

Speaking and listening can often be

seen as less formal and therefore a
less important element of childrens
learning. However research suggests
the opposite, reading difficulties can
be compounded if children are taught
written language before their spoken
language skills are developed enough
to access this teaching.83

Case study
The Trusts Talk of the Town
programme aims to embed
language in the curriculum for
all children, through building
on current practice. The
project was piloted in a school
federation in Wythenshawe
where whole class strategies
have been embedded to
support teachers.
This included daily activities to
promote talk, including talk
boxes in every primary
classroom and the
development of communication
notice boards for the secondary
school. In addition, a range of
interventions were used to
support those children who
were falling behind. For more
information please go to
www.thecommunicationtrust.
org.uk/talkofthetown

Case study
There are a range of tools
available to support schools
to identify strengths and
areas for progress. Different
approaches to supporting
changes in policy and practice
are available, through
systematic approaches,
workforce development and a
graduated approach through
interventions and support.
Many of The Trusts Consortium
members offer ways to audit
current practice and to build
communication into the
whole school environment.
For more information about
what services and resources
members provide for schools
please go to
www.thecommunicationtrust.
org.uk/consortiumcatalogue

The Better Communication Research

Programme (BCRP) have developed
a tool to support communication in
the classroom.88 Activities to scaffold
language development need to be
provided in a regular and deliberate
manner. These should include the
language learning interactions that
have been shown to develop oral
language, including grammatical
skills, vocabulary and narrative. For
example, vocabulary instructions
integrated into classroom routines89
and building working vocabularies
and conceptual development
through social interactions.90 All
school staff should fully understand,
appreciate and develop quality use
of a full range of language learning
interaction techniques.91
Effective talk needs to be properly
planned and designed by teachers,
with students supported and
facilitated and the teachers modeling
how to interact in group discussions.92
93
However the BCRP research has
shown changing classroom pedagogy
to support speech, language and
communication is challenging for
teachers.94
A Generation Adrift

21

Recent research
concludes
that teachers
would benefit
from more
knowledge of
childrens speech,
language and
communication
development, as
well as training
in how to assess
and measure
these skills in
young children
appropriately.

Early intervention/prevention
Knowledge of typical development
and the component elements of
language is crucial. Recent research
concludes that teachers would
benefit from more knowledge of
childrens speech, language and
communication development, as
well as training in how to assess
and measure these skills in young
children appropriately.95 The BCRP
has identified a number of factors
to consider in supporting early
identification. The Communication
Trust has also produced a number
of resources to support early
identification for use in schools96,
which have been evidenced as
being effective in reducing underidentification.97

Case study
Wallands County Primary
School is a Shine a Light award
winner with a dedicated
speech and language unit. The
unit supports teachers to learn
how to identify and support
children with SLCN. Reception
class children are assessed
on entry, which highlights
children who need further
investigation by a speech and
language therapist. Within the
school, children with SLCN are
prioritised for early intervention
and specific programmes of
support are given by dedicated
specialist teaching assistants.

Universal, targeted and

specialist
A graduated response is seen as
being important to support children
with SLCN; one which encompasses
universal quality teaching, catchup programmes of support for
children with delayed language,
and more specialist support for
those with more severe difficulties.
For the best outcomes, this model
would sit within a communication
friendly environment and with the
elements of leadership, workforce
and parents embedded throughout.
We have examples of models used
to implement this approach98 and
through BCRP evidence of what
interventions are most effective for
children with SLCN across all levels of
this graduated model.99

Case study
The What Works website
gives examples of a range
of interventions that work
across universal, targeted and
specialist levels. A systematic
framework for embedding
these approaches alongside
workforce development and
strategic leadership, such as
used in The Trusts Talk of the
Town programme, is key. For
more information please go to
www.thecommunicationtrust.
org.uk/whatworks

The importance of
interventions
There is a growing number of
evidenced interventions available to
support childrens speech, language
and communication. Interventions
at all levels are absolutely essential
to support children who can catch
up to do so and those with longer
term difficulties to communicate
to the very best of their ability. The
BCRP highlights the importance
of a personalised approach to
teaching and learning, reflecting an
understanding of a pupils language
learning and literacy needs, social
and communication difficulties and
academic progression.100 101

22

A Generation Adrift

Case study
Evidenced interventions are
available in the What Works
website to support a whole
range of SLCN. For example,
phonological awareness skills
essential for reading, programmes
demonstrating significant language

improvement in those children who

are delayed and programmes to
support language in those children
with the most complex needs. For
more information please go to
www.thecommunicationtrust.org.
uk/whatworks

Profiling
The BCRP strongly recommended
profiling and monitoring childrens
needs, in order to support effective
identification and support.102 103 The
Trust has tested ways of profiling
childrens needs through simple
tools and techniques within schools,
which have enabled identification of
children and the ability to signpost
different approaches of support,
dependent on the childs profile.104

Tools
Progression
Progression tools have been
developed to support
identification and profiling of
childrens language and
communication. Used in The
Trusts Talk of the Town
programme, alongside
Universally Speaking booklets
and training for staff, they
contributed to identification of
children with SLCN and
enabled staff to ensure
appropriate approaches and
monitoring of progress.
Talk of the Town 2012
Levels of under identification
pre-Talk of the Town
Nursery

50% under identified

Primary

31% under identified

Levels of under identification

post-Talk of the Town
Nursery

Fell to 15%

Primary

D Fell to between 5% and 10%

Specialist support services

Speech and language therapists
(SLTs) have a crucial role to play in
supporting children and young people
with SLCN. Collaborative working
between education and health
is advocated as best practice for
children with SLCN.105 106 The recent
BCRP recommends SLT support for
children with SLCN to be in schools.

Case study
One example of such practice
is another Shine a Light award
winner; Preston Manor School.
Their speech and language
base teamed up with the
English Department to deliver
a curriculum project to a
target group of Year 7 pupils.
Their goal was to create an
opportunity to develop a
more inclusive approach to
delivering the curriculum while
promoting effective speaking
and listening skills. Pupils were
given a lesson exploring what
it means to have a voice. They
created speech bubbles, which
were displayed on the board,
for example, one pupil said My
voice is my identity and thats
proof of my existence.

Parents
The evidence base regarding
the role of parents in supporting
and developing early language,
thinking and emotional skills is well
documented.107 108 109
Parents of children with SLCN face
additional challenges as often their
childs needs arent completely
understood by the professionals
around them. Parents often reported
challenges in knowing where to go for
information, both at the point of their
first concerns and then throughout
their childs development.
Parents have a crucial role to play
in supporting their child with SLCN.
They know their child best and
understand how they communicate

and their areas of interest, often key

to facilitating positive outcomes.
Research has also shown that parents
play a prominent role in supporting
SLTs to deliver interventions to their
children110 and can act as advocates
for their children in school.
Parents of children with SLCN
report wanting key people
surrounding their child to become
more knowledgeable, tolerant
and supportive of their needs.111
Parents valued outcomes related
to attainment, though this in
itself this was not enough. More
importantly they recognised the need
for increasing independence and
inclusion of their children and the
vital role that communication skills
play in the achievement of these
outcomes.112

Case study
Watercliffe Meadow School
in Sheffield, a Shine a Light
award winner, has a strategic
vision which emphasises
getting things right from
the start. Engaging parents
and carers is a high priority
with over 75% of new
parents attending workshops
including guidance about early
language development and
the importance of developing
language skills through play.
At the workshop the parents
work alongside their child on
practical activities to support
their learning. Then they take
home a piece of learning to do
together which feeds into the
next session.

Children and young people

Children and young people value
communication skills in their own
right and for the opportunities good
communication brings. Children and
young people with SLCN reported that
what made the biggest difference to
them was when people understood
the nature of their condition. They
wanted teachers to understand
pupils and what helps them.113
More recently, the BCRP gathered
extensive views from children
with SLCN. They found they were
particularly vulnerable to social
acceptance and with emotional
well-being. Children and young
people valued the help they received
to support their language needs but
felt the targets highlighted for them
at school werent reflective of their
areas of interest.114 In response to a
question about what aspects of other
peoples behaviour that they would
like to see change, interrupting,
shouting and teasing were the most
frequently mentioned. Children and
young people were very clear about
the importance of other peoples
understanding and behaviour
towards them and the difference it
makes.

Case study
Jack, 17, spent years avoiding
situations where he would
have to speak to people
because his stammer made
communication difficult. He
suffered from low self-esteem
and was bullied as a result of
his difficulty with speaking. In
2009, he attended a residential
course, which enabled him to
learn skills for controlling his
stammer and communicating
effectively. Jack now mentors
other young people who have
similar difficulties; he makes a
big difference to them as they
see him as someone who really
understands their experiences
and communication needs.

A Generation Adrift

25

Making it happen
We believe that communication skills should be at
the heart of schools policy in order that every child
can achieve their potential academically, socially,
emotionally and in their future career.

If we want all our young people to

be able to communicate to the best
of their ability, there needs to be a
continued shift in policy and practice
to support the way we are using
and developing communication in
the classroom. This also includes
how we are currently identifying
and supporting children who are
struggling with these skills.
The Communication Trust works to
ensure that every child and young
person is enabled to communicate
to the very best of their ability.
We recognise the centrality of
schools in delivering this vision
and are committed to working
with Government, local areas and
schools themselves in order to
achieve this.

26

A Generation Adrift

D N ational policy

D Local policy and practice

We will work with Government

and national agencies to ensure
that policy reflects the specific
needs of children and young
people with SLCN and supports the
communication needs of all young
people. We work collaboratively
with our partners to offer expert,
evidenced solutions. Our website
contains updates on our latest
policy work115 and our newsletter
gives updates on the latest
developments116.

We will ensure that speech,

language and communication
and SLCN are issues that those
who develop local policy and
service frameworks understand
and address in their policies and
services. Within the changing
landscape, we will provide practical
tools to support local authorities,
health commissioners and others
to ensure that children and young
people with SLCN receive the best
local services possible.
In order to achieve this were asking
schools to take our Communication
Commitment.

The Communication Commitment

We will provide individual schools,

federations and academy chains
with a user-friendly route to the
Communication Commitment, to
enable them to develop a whole
school approach to communication.
This approach will take schools
through a number of steps,
assessing their needs in relation to
communication and SLCN, helping
them to prioritise what they should
address to ensure the best possible
teaching and learning, and then
sign posting them to suitable and
effective resources and approaches
from the Trust and our Consortium.

This will focus on five areas:

1. School leadership
2. Staff development
3. Communication friendly schools
4. Identifying evidence-based
interventions to support children
and young people with SLCN
5. Engagement with parents,
families and employers

Making these necessary changes

in practise will enable schools to
make a commitment to address
communication and will support
them on their journey to create a
generation of great communicators.
To find out about this resource as
soon as it is launched, please email
enquiries@thecommunicationtrust.
org.uk

A Generation Adrift

27

References
 legg, J. (2004) Language and Behaviour: an
C
exploratory study of pupils in an exclusion unit.
Proceedings of the British Psychological Society
Developmental Section Annual Conference,
Leeds, September.
2
Bryan, K., Freer, J., and Furlong, C. (2007)
Language and communication difficulties in
juvenile offenders. International Journal of
Language & Communication Disorders, Vol. 42,
No. 5, Pages 505-520).
3
Davies, K. et al (2004) An Evaluation of the
Literacy Demands of General Offending
Behaviour Programmes. Home Office Findings
233.
4
Mercer, N. and Littleton, K. (2007) Dialogue
and the Development of Childrens Thinking.
London: Routledge.
5
Roulstone, S., Wren, Y., Bakopoulou, I. and
Lindsay, G. (2012) Exploring interventions
for children and young people with speech,
language and communication needs: A study
of practice. Better Communication Research
Programme, Department for Education.
6
Dockrell, J., Bakopoulou, I., Law J., Spencer,
S. and Lindsay, G. (2012) Developing a
communication supporting classrooms
observation tool. Better Communication
Research Programme, Department for
Education.
7
Bercow, J. (2008) The Bercow Report: A Review
of Services for Children and Young People (019)
with Speech, Language and Communication
Needs, Department for Education.
8
Tickell, C. (2011) The Early Years: Foundations
for life, health and learning. An Independent
Report on the Early Years Foundation Stage to
Her Majestys Government.
9
Nutbrown, C. (2012) Foundations for quality The independent review of early education and
childcare qualifications.
10
Allen, G. (2011) Early intervention: the next
steps An Independent Report to Her
Majestys Government.
11 
Field, F. (2010) The foundation years:
preventing poor children becoming poor adults.
The report of the Independent Review on
Poverty and Life Chances.
12
The Communication Trust (2012) Goodbye,
Hello http://www.thecommunicationtrust.org.
uk/media/27944/helloevaluationreport_-_
final.pdf
13
ibid
14
Ruben R. J., Redefining the survival of the
fittest: Communication Disorders in the 21st
Century, 2000.
15
Ofsted (2012) The report of Her Majestys Chief
Inspector of Education, Childrens Services and
Skills: Schools.
16
Locke, E., Ginsborg, J., and Peers, I. (2002)
Development and Disadvantage: implications
for early years. International Journal of
Language & Communication Disorders. 27 (1).
P.3 -15.
17
Waldfogel, J. and Washbrook, E. (2010) Low
income and early cognitive development in the
1

28

A Generation Adrift

U.K. London: Sutton Trust.

 regory, S. (2012) Investing in their future: how
G
do we ensure our children get the good quality
early years provision they need if they and the
country are to succeed in the future? Ofsted
Early Years Annual Lecture.
19
CBI (2012) First Steps: A new approach for our
schools CBI. http://www.cbi.org.uk/campaigns/
education-campaign-ambition-for-all/newapproach-for-schools-infographic
20
Specific language impairment (SLI) is a
developmental disorder where language
difficulties are out of line with a childs
other abilities and with no obvious cause or
impairment.
21
Goswami, U., and Bryant, P. (2007) Childrens
Cognitive Development and Learning (Primary
Review Research Survey 2/1a) Cambridge:
University of Cambridge Faculty of Education
and literacy.
22
Eastman, A. (2011) No excuses: A review of
educational exclusion. Centre for Social Justice.
23
Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., Bailey, A. M.,
Stothard, S. and Lindsay, G. (2011) Language
and Literacy Attainment of Pupils during
Early Years and through KS2: Does teacher
assessment at five provide a valid measure
of childrens current and future educational
attainments? Better Communication Research
Programme. Department for Education.
24
Gross, J. (2011) The contribution of oral
language skills to school improvement and
outcomes for children and young people.
Office of the Communication Champion.
25
Snowling, M., and Stackhouse, J. (2006)
Dyslexia, Speech and Language: A Practitioners
Handbook. Dyslexia Series. Chichister: Whurr
Publishers Ltd.
26
Hartshorne, M. (2006) Speech, Language and
Communication Needs and Literacy Difficulties.
I CAN Talk Series, Issue 1.
27
Hirsch (1996) The Effects of Weaknesses in
Oral Language on Reading Comprehension
Growth. cited in Torgesen, J. (2004) Current
issues in assessment and intervention for
younger and older students. Paper presented
at NASP Workshop.
28
Snow, C. E. (1999) Why the home is so
important in learning to read. Paper presented
at the George Graham Lecture in Reading,
Charlottesville, VA.
29
Feinstein, L., and Duckworth, K. (2006)
Development in the early years: Its importance
for school performance and adult outcomes
(20) London: Centre for Research on the Wider
Benefits of Learning.
30
Dockrell, J., Ricketts, J., Palikara, O., Charman,
T., and Lindsay, G., (2012) Profiles of need
and provision for children with language
impairments and autism spectrum disorders
in mainstream schools: A prospective study.
Better Communication Research Programme.
31
Better Communication Research Programme.
32
ibid
33
Howe, C. and Mercer, N. (2007) Childrens
18

Social Development, Peer Interaction and

Classroom Learning. Primary Review Research
Survey 2/1b. Cambridge: University of
Cambridge Faculty of Education.
34
Durkin, K. (1995) Developmental Social
Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
35
St Clair, M., Pickles, A., Durkin, K., and ContiRamsden, G. (2011) A longitudinal study of
behavioral, emotional and social difficulties in
individuals with a history of specific language
impairment (SLI). Journal of Communication
Disorders. 44 (2). p. 186199.
36
Vallotton, C., and Ayoub, C. (2011) Use
your words: The role of language in the
development of toddlers self-regulation.
Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 26 (2). p.
169181.
37
Clegg, J. (2004) Language and behaviour: an
explanatory study of pupils in an exclusion unit.
British Psychological Society Development
Section Annual Conference, Leeds.
38
Arnold, D. H., Kupersmidt, J. B., Voegler-Lee, M.
E., and Marshall, N. A. (2012) The association
between preschool childrens social
functioning and their emergent academic
skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 27
(3). p. 376386.
39
Strand and Lindsay (2012)
40
Meschi, E., Micklewright J., Vignoles, A
and Lindsay, G. (2012) The transitions
between categories of special educational
needs of pupils with Speech, Language and
Communication Needs (SLCN) and Autism
Spectrum Disorder (ASD) as they progress
through the education system. Better
Communication Research Programme.
41
Better Communication Research Programme.
42
Klee, T. (2007) Screening 3-year-olds for
language delay using selected parent-report
measures: the jury is still out., EvidenceBased Communication Assessment and
Intervention. 1(2). p. 58-59.
43
Laing, G. J., Law, J., Levin, A., and Logan,
S. (2002) Evaluation of a structured test
and a parent led method for screening for
speech and language problems: Prospective
population based study. British Medical
Journal. p. 325 (1152).
44
Lee, W. (2013) Talk of the Town evaluation
report. The Communication Trust.
45
Dockrell, J., Ricketts, J., Palikara, O., Charman,
T., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 30 for
the full reference.
46
Conti-Ramsden, G., Simkin, Z., and Botting,
N. (2006) The prevalence of autistic spectrum
disorders in adolescents with a history of
specific language impairment. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry. 47 (6).
47
Ofsted, (2010) A statement is not enough The special educational needs and disability
review.
48
McLaughlin, M. J., Dyson, A., Nagle, K.,
Thurlow, M., Rouse, M., Hardman, M., Norwich,
B., Burke. P. J., and Perlin, M. (2006) Crosscultural perspectives on the classification of

children with disabilities: Part II Implementing

classification systems in schools. Journal of
Special Education. 40 (1). P. 46-58.
49
Dockrell, J., Ricketts, J., Palikara, O., Charman,
T., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 30 for
the full reference.
50
Bercow, J. (2008) See endnote 7 for the full
reference.
51
Ofsted Annual report 2009/2010
52
Goswami, U., and Bryant, P. (2007) See
endnote 21 for the full reference.
53
Mercer, N. and Littleton, K. (2007) See endnote
4 for the full reference.
54
Ofsted (2009) English at the Crossroads: An
Evaluation of English in primary and secondary
schools 2005/8.
55
Eastman, A. (2011) See endnote 22 for the full
reference.
56
https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/
eOrderingDownload/teachers%20standards.
pdf
57
The Framework for the National Curriculum - A
report by the Expert Panel for the National
Curriculum review (2011) https://www.
education.gov.uk/publications/standard/
publicationDetail/Page1/DFE-00135-2011
58
Ofsted, (2012) The framework for school
inspection http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/
resources/framework-for-school-inspection
59
Roulstone, S., and Lindsay, G. (2010) The
perspectives of children and young people who
have speech, language and communication
needs, and their parents. Department for
Education
60
YouGov/The Communication Trust survey,
June 2007.
61
Ofsted (2009) See endnote 54 for the full
reference.
62
The Bullock Report (1975) A language for life.
Report of the Committee of Enquiry appointed
by the Secretary of State for Education and
Science under the Chairmanship of Sir Alan
Bullock FBA http://www.educationengland.
org.uk/documents/bullock/bullock01.html
63
Sage, R. (2005) Communicating with students
who have learning and behaviour difficulties:
A continuing professional development
programme. Emotional and Behavioural
Difficulties. 10 (4) cited in I CAN Talk secondary
paper.
64
National Literacy Trust, 2011
65
Baumwell, Tamis-LeMonda & Bornstein, 1997;
Hoff, 2003; Landry, Miller-Loncar, Smith &
Swank, 1997
66
Girolametto & Weitzman, 2002
67
Ofsted (2012) From training to teaching early
language and literacy: The effectiveness of
training to teach language and literacy in
primary schools.
68
RCSLT survey 2013.
69
Gross, J. (2011) Two Years On: final report of
the Communication Champion for children.
Office of the Communication Champion.
70
Gross, J. (2011) See endnote 24 for the full
reference.
71
Stackhouse J., and Wright J. A. (2011)
Introduction: Childrens Language and
Communication Needs: Evaluating Intervention
and Service Provision in Schools. Child

Language Teaching and Learning. 27 (2).

ibid.
73
Ofsted (2010) See endnote 70 for the full
reference.
74
Department for Education (2011) The
Framework for the National Curriculum. A
report by the Expert Panel for the National
Curriculum review. London: Department for
Education.
75
Ayre, A., and Roulstone, S. (2009) Transition
to secondary school: supporting pupils with
speech, language and communication needs.
Report to The Communication Trust.
76
Stackhouse J., Wright J. A. (2011) See endnote
71 for the full reference.
78
Lindsay, G., Wren, Y., Bakapoulou, I., Goodlad,
S., and Roulstone, S. (2012) Interventions
for Children with Speech, Language And
Communication Needs (SLCN) in England: A
Survey Of Speech And Language Therapists.
Better Communication Research Programme:
2nd interim report. Department for Education.
79
The Communication Trusts Consortium
Catalogue, www.thecommunicationtrust.org.
uk/consortiumcatalogue.
80
Dockrell, J. E., Bakopoulou, I., Law, J., Spencer,
S., and Lindsay, G. (2012) Developing a
communication supporting classrooms
observation tool. London: Department for
Education.
81
This view has been proposed historically by
many, from The Bullock Report (1975) through
to the most recent National Curriculum Expert
Group.
82
Department for Education (2011) See endnote
74 for the full reference.
83
Locke, E., Ginsborg, J., and Peers, I. (2002)
Development and Disadvantage: implications
for early years. International Journal of
Language & Communication Disorders. 27 (1).
P.3 -15.
84
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority
(2008) Curriculum Evidence Probe 2 Report
Dialogue and Curriculum Development.
85
Howe, C. and Mercer, N. (2007) See endnote
33 for the full reference.
86
(Girolametto, Hoaken, Weitzman, & van
Leishout, 2000)
87
Dockrell, J. E., Bakopoulou, I., Law, J., Spencer,
S., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 80 for
the full reference.
88
Dockrell, J. E., Bakopoulou, I., Law, J., Spencer,
S., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 80 for
the full reference.
89
Xue, Y., and Meisels, S. J. (2004) Early literacy
instruction and learning in kindergarten.
American Educational Research Journal. 41
(1). p. 191-229.
90
Winters, R. (2004) Vocabulary anchors: Building
conceptual connections with young readers.
Reading instruction: Putting the National
Reading Pane Report into Practice. 130.
91
Dockrell, J. E., Bakopoulou, I., Law, J., Spencer,
S., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 78 for
the full reference.
92
Howe, C. and Mercer, N. (2007) See endnote
33 for the full reference.
93
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority
(2008) See endnote 84 for the full reference.
72

Better Communication Research Programme.

Hutchinson J., and Clegg J. (2011) Education
practitioner-led intervention to facilitate
language learning in young children: An
effectiveness study. Child Language Teaching
and Learning. 27 (2). p. 151 164.
96
Lee. W, (2011) Universally Speaking series. The
Communication Trust
97
Lee, W. (2013) Talk of the Town evaluation
report. The Communication Trust
98
Lee, W. (2013) Talk of the Town evaluation
report. The Communication Trust
99
www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk/
whatworks
100
Dockrell, J., Ricketts, J., Palikara, O., Charman,
T., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 30 for
the full reference.
101
www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk
102
McLaughlin, M.J., Dyson, A., Nagle, K.,
Thurlow, M., Rouse, M., Hardman, M., Norwich,
B., Burke. P.J., and Perlin, M. (2006) Crosscultural perspectives on the classification of
children with disabilities: Part II Implementing
classification systems in schools. Journal of
Special Education. 40 (1), p. 46-58.
103
Dockrell, J., Ricketts, J., Palikara, O., Charman,
T., and Lindsay, G., (2012) See endnote 30 for
the full reference.
104
Lee, W. (2012) Speech, language and
communication progression tools. The
Communication Trust
105
Gascoigne, M. (2006) Supporting Children with
Speech, Language and Communication needs
within integrated childrens services. RCSLT
Position Paper. London: RCSLT.
106
Stackhouse J., Wright J. A. (2011) See
endnote 71 for the full reference.
107
Hart, B., and Risley, T. (2003) The early
catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by 3.
American Educator. 27 (1). p. 4-9.
108
Blanden, J. (2006) Bucking the trend: what
enables those who are disadvantaged in
childhood to succeed later in life? Department
for Work and Pensions.
109
OECD (2011) What can parents do to help
their children succeed in school? PISA IN
FOCUS OECD.
110
Lindsay, G., Wren, Y., Bakapoulou, I., Goodlad,
S., and Roulstone, S. (2012) See endnote 78
for the full reference.
111
Roulstone, S., Coad, J., Hambly, H., and
Ayre, A., (2010) Preferred outcomes. Better
Communication Research Group: 1st Interim
Report. Department for Education.
112
Roulstone, S., and Lindsay, G. (2010) see
endnote 59 for full reference.
113
Lee, W. (2009) What do children and young
people think about speech, language and
communication skills? The Communication
Trust.
114
Roulstone, S., and Lindsay, G. (2010) See
endnote 59 for the full reference.
115
Visit The Communication Trust Policy Pages
at www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk/policy
116
Sign up to The Communication Trust
newsletter at our website www.
thecommunicationtrust.org.uk
94
95

A Generation Adrift

29

Recent research concludes that teachers would benefit

from more knowledge of childrens speech, language
and communication development, as well as training
in how to assess and measure these skills in young
children appropriately.

The Communication Trust is a coalition of nearly 50 voluntary and community

organisations with expertise in speech, language and communication. We
harness our collective expertise to support the childrens workforce and
commissioners to support all children and young peoples communication
skills, particularly those with speech, language and communication needs
(SLCN).
We do this by raising awareness, providing information and workforce
development opportunities, influencing policy, promoting best practice among
the childrens workforce and commissioning work from our members.
The Trust was founded in 2007 by childrens charities Afasic and I CAN
together with BT and the Council for Disabled Children.
www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk
This paper was written by Wendy Lee, Professional Director at
The Communication Trust
Published January 2013
Design and photography: deborahripley.com

The Communication Trust

8 Wakley Street,
London EC1V 7QE
020 7843 2526
www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk