Ron Olin & Marietta Parkers Superseding

Indictment Is a Vindictive Corruption Cover-Up In

The Yellow House Case.

FEDERAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENTS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT IS A VINDICTIVE

CORRUPTION COVER UP IN YELLOW HOUSE CASE LAWRENCE KANSAS
This latest superseding indictment is an obvious attempt by the prosecutor for more cover-ups. What is most sad is
what kind of injustice the witnesses only listed by initials on the Yellow House indictment the Government claims
are known to the Grand Jury have had to endure since 2005.
How much intimidation and harassment has been forced upon them to bring them to the point we are at now?
These people who as the indictment indicates are known to the Grand Jury should in reality be listed as victims of
the Government.These individuals who the Government are using as pawns in this case have been harassed at their
work place, intimidated, searched, followed, pulled over without being ticketed, illegally taken into custody to be
interrogated about the Yellow House, lied to, had their families thrown to the floor and concussion grenades
thrown into their homes by Lawrence Police officers, scared to death then been given plea deals and even released
from prison early in exchange for their perjured non credible testimony.
Several customers victimized during the investigation of this business have filed formal complaints, and one
customer is in the litigation process of a huge lawsuit against the city of Lawrence Kansas and its Police
department for the harassment that was endured because of this corrupt investigation. The question is where is the
evidence of a crime? Where are the police reports? Where is the evidence that the owners of the Yellow House
business ever participated in any property crimes, thefts, or fencing schemes when hearsay evidence is not
admissible in federal court?Why has not one thief or booster been arrested in connection with the Yellow House
business or the investigation that has spanned over nearly three years?How can the Government continue to put lis
pendens and Forfeitures against the defendants property when there are no convictions?Because someone scared
out their wits that has been harassed and intimidated by the police and Government officials over a period of
nearly three years are known to the Grand Jury to have sold something to the business because the Government
saw their name on a check the business wrote them, does not constitute a Federal crime or a money laundering
scheme.This new superseding indictment, which is now the fourth indictment based upon one original indictment
from 2005 with no new incidents of wrong doing is a disgrace to the Justice System. The indictment calls for a
forfeiture of property listed as a substitute asset. This is clearly not admissible in the 10th circuit court. There are
no fruits of any crime here because there is no crime that has been proven to have been committed; only hearsay
evidence has been presented by people with questionable credibility, and there have been no convictions in this
case.
It makes no sense that the Government would charge defendants with no criminal history of being unlawful users
with a firearm, and then dismiss the charges.Then bring back the same charges with added enhancements execute a
second arrest without new incidents on the same charges. Then file yet another indictment of money laundering
and mail fraud based on circumstantial evidence, false written statements and perjury. Then 5 months later, file a
vindictive superseding indictment on top of the original questionable indictment two days after the defendants file
a motion to dismiss an illegal forfeiture allegation on their property.How many times between 2005 and 2008 can
a couple of pissed off Federal prosecutors9Terra D Morehead & Marietta N. Parker #77807 charge and arrest the
same defendants on the same charges in a corrupt vindictive prosecution?
Here is # 5 of Marietta's indictment and it clearly states upon conviction, and any property traceable to such
offense, Parker has No conviction and has NOT proved any property has been traced to the crimes she has charged
the yellow house business owners , What is wrong with you Parker !
Your supervisor should make you sit down and shut up!
You are NOT the Judge or the Jury!
Here is the section of the law from her Vindictive Indictment, Note the" words convicted of offense" and "alleged
to be traceable to"
Sounds like Parker has the Business owners guilty and convicted before the trial ( if there ever is one)
For example, 18 U.S.C. § 982 (a)(1) provides, “The court, inimposing sentence on a person convicted of an
offense in violation of section 1956 . . .shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property, real or
personal,involved in such offense, or any property traceable to such offense.” In this case, theAndover property is
alleged to be traceable to the offense of money laundering.
Is this case really being prosecuted by impartial prosecutors?
If you would like to help the Yellow business Owners please call Parkers Office and ask why these charges have
not been dropped, also would you like to know just how many millions of dollars of tax payers money have been
wasted on this stupid vindictive prosecution.
Marietta Parker, # 77807 marietta.parker@usdoj.gov
Assistant United States Attorney
Case 2:07-cr-20124-CM Document 43 Filed 03/04/2008
1-913-551-6674 or 1-913-551-6730 or call 1-913-390-5023 or 1-913-551-6732
Or call the Cell phone at 1-913-961-2539
FBI Public Corruption at 1-816-221-6100
Topeka FBI ask for Scott Gentine 1-785-235-3811 or 1-785-368-1555
Maybe you could call the Kansas Human Right Commission about our case
at toll free 1-888-793-6874
Please do not forget to contact Dan Winter at the ACLU for us at 1-816-756-3113
or email the aclu at staff@aclukswmo.org
Thanks for all of your helping us fight Parkers Corruption.
Labels: 10th circuit court lis penden, money laundering mail fraud vexaious prosecution, perjury
indictment, vindictive prosecution