Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
March 2014
www.ijsret.org
Assistant Professor,
1,2,3
ABSTRACT
II.
I.
MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF DC
MOTOR
INTRODUCTION
G (s)
kT
( S )
Ea ( S ) ( Las Ra )( Js B ) kbkT
Where
Ra : armature resistance ()
La : armature inductance (H)
Ia : armature current (A)
Ea : input voltage (V)
eb : back electromotive force (V)
Tm: motor torque (Nm)
: angular velocity of rotor (rad/s)
J : rotor inertia (kgm2)
B: friction constant (Nms/rad)
Kb: EMF constant (Vs/rad)
KT: torque constant (Nm/A)
Because the back EMF eb is proportional to speed
directly, hence
eb(t) = Kb
d (t ) K (t)
= b
dt
dia (t )
dt
+ eb(t)
IJSRET @ 2014
March 2014
(KDs2 K p s KI )KT
d 2 (t )
d
Tm(t) = J
+B
= KTia(t)
2
dt
dt
www.ijsret.org
KT
( s )
=
E a ( s ) ( La s Ra )( Js B) K b K T
( )dt + KD
de(t )
dt
KI
U (s)
KDs
s
E (s)
III.
MATLAB
IV.
ADVANTAGES
It allows quick and easy coding in a very highlevel language.
Rich data types: Complex number, Three
dimensional matrix, structure, cell array, etc
March 2014
V.
www.ijsret.org
REFERENCES
[1]Ramu Krishnan, Electric motor drives:
modelling, analysis, and Control, Prentice Hall,
London, 2001.
[2] Brian R Copeland, The Design of PID Controllers
using Ziegler Nichols Tuning, (March 2008)
[3] PID Control of Continuous Processes by John W.
Webb Ronald A. Reis.
[4] K.P Ramachandran Control EngineeringWiley
Precise Textbook, 2011.
[5] PID Example: DC Motor Speed Control
SIMULATION RESULTS
COMPARISION OF MPC WITH PID
CONTROLLER:
1.2
1
S
0.8
P
E 0.6
E 0.4
D
0.2
MPC
COHENCOON
0
0
CONTROLLER
50
TIME
100
150
PID
RISE
TIME
59
OVER
SHOOT
0.12
SETTLING
TIME
75
MPC
59
VI.
CONCLUSION
IJSRET @ 2014