1

The three fundamental changes necessary for a more

perfect union:

1. Redesigning education, changing its purpose and basic

function from preparation for the world of work to
preparation for life, and a general understanding of
reality.
a. Rather than the standard approach of forced
memorization, the practice of education would
consist of various methods of gradual memory
consolidation. Such methods would improve
memory, and in effect improve intelligence and
understanding on the whole.
b. Putting education on its head, focusing on
education at the kindergarten through fifth grade
level, with as much information given, and
applied as purposefully as possible, focusing on
the increase of intelligence and smartness; the
later years of middle and high school would be
the years preparing the young people for life:
vocational, technical, general.
c. The standard teacher at the k-5 level would be
that of a professor of whatever chosen field they
profess, and it would be the responsibility of the
administration to hire those capable of this task.
d. The pay rate of educators and school workers
would be justly increased due to their vital role in
society, but so would expectations. (However,
such recalibrations of pay rates would be
 2

expressed throughout the economy of human

potential.)
2. Abolishing the banking systems and other monetary
institutions of the country wherein this system is
accepted, replacing them with a governmentally run
system of exchange.
a. The use of government issued currency, and the
disuse of bankrolled-fiat currency would ensure a
return to times of sound monetary exchange—if
there ever were such times.
b. In combination, the use of electronic currency
independent from the value structure of material
goods, is potentially unlimited to its possessor
(Joe Citizen); without debt, taxation, interest, or
usury attached whatsoever to currency or
entitlements will drastically improve the
economic climate, and pacify the chaotic cycle of
booms and busts that fractional reserve currency
ensures in economies based solely on material
value structures. Such electronic currency would
be entitlements exclusive to citizenship as an act
of societal reciprocation. (In other words,
something like debit cards that refill regularly as
a reward for benefiting society with labor.)
c. Changing the pay structure such that time is no
longer the primary factor, superficial values are
replaced basically by quality; working relative to
one and other keeps competition, but takes away
the appeal of slacking off.
d. An office to formally, and independently qualify
product and overall business quality (along the
 3

lines of how beneficial the product is to

everyone, how difficult it is to make, and demand
for the product) would be established, essentially
changing nothing about the way we look at how
things should be priced, only its incentive is to
progressively heighten quality and shorten cost.
3. Improving the checks and balances concept of the
United States Constitution by adding a fourth branch.
a. Much like the Judicial Branch, offices of this
council will exist at county, state, and federal
levels.
b. Each office will be populated by nine voices of
wisdom, to be both elected by the people and
selected by the existing members of that office.
c. Said branch will act as oligarchic advisor, its
purpose to instill wisdom in the character of
society through education, acting as the founder
and supervisor of the newly proposed education
system.
d. Given the power to thwart foolishness in
government, business, and public matters, and
ensure wisdom in society, this branch is given
great power. However, this branch is also
stripped of its power; the law regarding assault
and battery does not protect the heads of this
office—meaning that they are absolutely subject
to the people’s unrest—putting the people at the
head of the governments’ systemic totem pole,
where they belong.
 4

In other words, the three elements needed to

improve government and our lives are:

1. The fundamental change in practice and

concept of education, as well as the structure of
government.
2. Revising the present currency standard and
principle of profit motive.
3. Wisdom.

Ultimately the goals of this form of development

would be to facilitate:

1. The eventual elimination of the necessity of the

pursuance of abstract object wealth (society without
want) while heightening the standards of basic-and-
up living and productivity.
2. The continuous increase of overall and individual
freedom, while at the same time redefining it to
incorporate more liberty and duty to each person’s
lives—so as to make them Happy and well lived in
their own way—working towards the first goal.
3. Gradual progression towards planetary
consciousness on an individual, indivisible basis.

Setting the goals high, even small victories are

milestones compared to the stagnant development of today,
caused in part by the present institutions of business and
government. This is the wisdom of the future; what this
proposes is the denial of stagnation, and an end to the
nonsense of the past.
 5

These and other such improvements, at the people’s

discretion, will vastly change society towards a more
perfect union. For instance, redefining Citizenship into a
privilege to be earned by work and participation in society,
not something one is born with, would improve the general
welfare of society and civilization. Under this precept, the
rights that go along with citizenship are: food, clothing,
shelter, transportation, and information—yet incentives are
kept in tact by providing entitlements similar to the cash
based money system of today, but the buyer is open to a
global market.
Upon considering utopian ideals, or the prospect of a
more perfect union regarding the present, one considers
what is different from now, as compared to the failures or
imperfections of theory and practice in the past. What is
most different from now as compared to then? Lets agree
upon the obvious answers: the difference is the
technological climate we live in today, and the resulting
interconnectedness of humanity with itself as never before
(and that potential for greater connectedness mounts with
every passing year if applied correctly), and the difference
is a necessity to transcend the powers that be as never
before—to pass the threshold of governments and power
structures based on antiquated and self serving premises,
which have themselves evolved from premises and power
structures of times long past.
And like the terms liberal and conservative are used to
divide the people, republican and democrat are parties used
to provoke conflict over basic ideologies—prescribed to the
public through the partner media, counting on the
confusion inherent in our culture to manipulate public
 6

opinion. As with most any noun that rests at the discretion

of a culture that is purely and blindly man made (as
opposed to the axioms or maxims, which are derived
through observation of the environment) the system of
government, as it presently exists, has slowly deteriorated
to fit the desires of those who truly control it, guide it, and
consider it theirs. Those who I speak of are the people
themselves, and the corporations and political minds that
the people have willingly given their sovereignty to.
Slowly, as history and experience has shown, the
people gradually relinquish their freedom and prosperity
for supposed security, which is actually convenience and
false security because present governments and
corporations can only provide superficial solutions to deep
seeded problems that they themselves created (the buck
stops here for them), leading to the opposite of the people’s
desires in the first place, causing them to demand more
solutions from the government or corporations, leading to a
greater loss of freedom, prosperity, and health. And as the
generations unfold, they do not know what the previous
generations had to begin with, and what was natural for
them, and therefore feel their general lack of freedom and
prosperity and health is normal, and are more willing to
give up what their forefathers lived and died for.
Therefore replenishment, repossession, or re-evolution
of our concept of what it means to live now, as free people,
is necessary ever so often. Whatever the factors are that
contribute to the injustices of the world, their existence acts
presently, that is undeniable if you believe they exist at all,
yet whenever someone gives the society a proposal for
really solving these problems addressed, the reply, the
 7

excuse for inaction where action is due is always, “the way

the world is now is the way the world is, and you can’t
change that.” This is circular logic that gets everyone
nowhere fast. We must forget how the world works now,
not to cut it open to change it so that it is unrecognizable,
but so that the frame of mind needed to make it better,
more perfect than it was before, can come into being within
society so that improvements can be made.
Is now a constant state of existence that does not
change, or is now an ever changing, ever growing state of
existence that has only that one constant of change, which
builds upon the choices that everyone makes day to day? If
you are inclined to believe the latter, then the way things
are now means nothing to you—and nothing means
potentially infinite possibilities—and you are willing to go
through harmless although frustrating insecurity and
confusion to get it, to see subtle and slow improvements
made, because that is what real change looks like.
Culturally, Americans think this kind of amendment is
terrifying, and culturally conspiracies have become
something of a sin to believe in (laughable considering that
the conspiracy perspective of history was the perspective of
choice only a hundred years ago), but culture is only an
aggregate of catchy fads that may lasts longer than one
generation; anything cultural is without substance or real
importance to our lives. Science is not a fad, religion is not
a fad, philosophy is not a fad, and government is not a fad;
these things are tools for our well being, but they are not
stagnant, not naturally, as nature is not stagnant. Watch one
of them become stagnant and you are witnessing its
 8

decline; watch some or all go stagnate and you are

witnessing our decline.
Has our government become stagnant, without
observable improvement, and society with it; have
freedoms flourished, economies flowed, our technologies
grown in a meaningful and productive way, or have they
been directed at entertainment and other causes of mental
stagnancy—driving society further into isolation? Would
you say we are watching the decline of western civilization
or the rise? The question is how much progress has been
made in the 21st century really?
No world can exist without progress; no being can call
itself alive without improvement. But when it’s all about
the image, the superficial, insignificant points matter more
than the real ones, or they appear to matter more because
it’s all in the image of what is presented. Providing the
people with a distinguished media, one that is not
corruptible by the government body itself, or by other big
interests is essential to improving society and civilization.
The truth and the honest perspective must be brought to the
people by a comprehensive reporting service, using
television and Internet for a way to convey raw data in a
way that stimulates the mind, and creates a state of critical,
intense thought towards global consciousness.
The citizens, enlightened and intelligent, would
require self sufficiency in this matter; administering their
own media, absent advertising and corporate greed, to
crush up the false truths and to properly digest reality on
their own. A return to progress must be made, and these
ideas are but stepping-stones in that direction. Do with
them what you will.