Sei sulla pagina 1di 110

PERSONAL PROJECT

Assessment of Futsal
Development in Europe

BORUT KUKOVEC

Lausanne
October, 2009
Assessment of Futsal Development in Europe
Borut Kukovec

ABSTRACT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Futsal has started to grow significantly all around the globe in the last two decades. Growth of this
sport was also noticed in European countries where many Futsal national leagues were launched
and respective clubs and national teams are competing in European competitions organized by
UEFA. The purpose of this study was to assess the current situation in European Futsal in order to
help UEFA with their future Futsal development strategies. In order to achieve the objective survey
was conducted among all the UEFA affiliated member federations. Survey has been sent over the e-
mail to the representative of Futsal in the country. It was a great challenge to get replies from all the
countries but with persistency and hard work this target was achieved. Research has confirmed that
Futsal has established itself as sport discipline in Europe. First of all, 50 out 53 countries are
playing FIFA official version of Futsal. Furthermore, there are approximately 500.000 registered
and 11 million unregistered players in Europe. In 45 countries they have organized national leagues
where average budget of clubs is between 10.000 – 50.000 EUR. Futsal is most popular among
youth (16-25 years old) and adults (26-40 years) that represent the majority of players and fans. On
the other side, lack of financial resources, dominant position of football and lack of hall availability
were recognized as the key obstacles that prevent Futsal to grow (even) more. Main
recommendations that Futsal shall follow in future is to commercialize the sport to a higher extent
(use creative approaches to attract sponsors and media), promote it in educational institutions and
give special attention to development of women’s, youth and senior’s Futsal.

SUPERVISOR: Daniel, Oyon, professor

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 2/110 Borut Kukovec


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
ABSTRACT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................2 

1. Table of figures/images....................................................................................................................6 

2. List of abbreviations.........................................................................................................................7 

3. Introduction......................................................................................................................................8 

4. Literature review ............................................................................................................................10 

5. Research methodology...................................................................................................................12 

6. European Futsal survey results ......................................................................................................14 

6.1 Highlights & Key figures.........................................................................................................15 

6.2 FIFA official version................................................................................................................16 

6.3 Leisure sport.............................................................................................................................16 

6.4 Competitive sport.....................................................................................................................16 

6.5 Influential factors for development of Futsal...........................................................................17 

6.6 Futsal/Football players registration..........................................................................................17 

6.7 Number of registered Futsal players ........................................................................................18 

6.8 Number of unregistered players...............................................................................................18 

6.9 Restrictive rules Futsal/football rules ......................................................................................19 

6.10 Youth national teams competition .........................................................................................20 

6.11 Women’s Futsal .....................................................................................................................20 

6.12 Governance of Futsal .............................................................................................................22 

6.13 Futsal administration..............................................................................................................23 

6.14 National Futsal league............................................................................................................24 

6.14.1 League levels & number of clubs per level.....................................................................25 

6.14.2 Average and highest attendance in top division..............................................................25 

6.14.3 Average and the highest budget – top division club .......................................................26 

6.14.4 TV coverage....................................................................................................................27 

6.14.5 Media & national Futsal league ......................................................................................29 

6.15. Evolution of Futsal media coverage in the last 5 years.........................................................30 

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 3/110 Borut Kukovec


6.16 Futsal growth obstacles..........................................................................................................30 

6.17 Futsal stakeholders interest ....................................................................................................32 

6.17.1 Futsal & different age groups..........................................................................................32 

6.17.2 Futsal and sponsors .........................................................................................................35 

6.18 European Futsal perspective ..................................................................................................37 

6.19 Liechtenstein, Faroe Islands & Luxemburg...........................................................................38 

6.20 Comments & suggestions ......................................................................................................38 

7. Futsal best practices .......................................................................................................................40 

8. Conclusion .....................................................................................................................................45 

9. References......................................................................................................................................47 

10. Appendices...................................................................................................................................49 

Appendix 1: Survey Questionnaire ................................................................................................49 

Appendix 2: Respondents profile...................................................................................................58 

Appendix 3: FIFA Futsal version...................................................................................................59 

Appendix 4: Leisure Futsal emergence..........................................................................................60 

Appendix 5: Competitive Futsal emergence..................................................................................61 

Appendix 6: Futsal/football players license differentiation...........................................................63 

Appendix 7: Restrictive rules for Futsal/football players ..............................................................64 

Appendix 8: Youth competitions interest ......................................................................................65 

Appendix 9: Women’s Futsal ........................................................................................................66 

Appendix 10: National governance of Futsal ................................................................................68 

Appendix 11: Governing body administration (full-time, part-time) ............................................69 

Appendix 12: National Futsal league establishment......................................................................71 

Appendix 13: Number of national league levels............................................................................73 

Appendix 14: Number of clubs per division..................................................................................74 

Appendix 15: League levels – indoors or outdoors .......................................................................80 

Appendix 16: Average budget of a top division club ....................................................................81 

Appendix 17: Regional TV coverage (number of hours/season, form of coverage) .....................82 

Appendix 18: National TV coverage (number of hours/season, form of coverage)......................84 

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 4/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 19: National Futsal league & Media categories ............................................................86 

Appendix 20: Evolution of the media coverage in the last 5 years................................................88 

Appendix 21: European Futsal growth obstacles...........................................................................89 

Appendix 22: Level of interest to play Futsal among different age groups...................................93 

Appendix 23: Level of interest to watch and follow Futsal among different age groups..............95 

Appendix 24: Level of interest of sponsors to support Futsal .......................................................97 

Appendix 25: Do youngsters play Futsal in educational institutions?...........................................98 

Appendix 26: Level of interest of educational institutions to support Futsal ..............................100 

Appendix 27: European Futsal KPI table ....................................................................................103 

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 5/110 Borut Kukovec


1. Table of figures/images

TABLE OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Importance of different media categories for national league............................................29 


Figure 2: European Futsal growth obstacles ......................................................................................31 
Figure 3: Level of interest to play Futsal among different age groups ..............................................33 
Figure 4: Level of interest to watch and follow Futsal among different age groups .........................34 
Figure 5: Level of interest of sponsors to support Futsal...................................................................35 
Figure 6: Level of interest of educational institutions to support Futsal ..........................................36 

TABLE OF IMAGES

Picture 1: Women’s Futsal in 2009 ...................................................................................................21 


Picture 2: Women’s Futsal in the future ...........................................................................................22 
Picture 3: National Futsal leagues .....................................................................................................24 

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 6/110 Borut Kukovec


2. List of abbreviations

UEFA – Union of European Football Associations

FIFA - Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Futsal EURO - European Fusal Championship for national teams

Futsal U-21 EURO - European Fusal Championship for national teams under 21 years old

KPI – Futsal key performance indicators table

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 7/110 Borut Kukovec


3. Introduction

"Futsal will always be my first love." - Ronaldo

What do the former and current football superstars, like Pele, Ronaldo, Kaka, and Messi, have in
common? They all played Futsal when they were young! By playing this dynamic and attractive
sport they have improved their football skills. Improved technique, confidence with the ball, passing
abilities and creativity are only few examples of a positive contribution that Futsal brings to football
players.

"In Futsal you need to think quick and play quick so it's easier for you
when you move to normal football (outdoor soccer)." - Pele

However, Futsal is not only the sport that is playing supportive role to football. With all its beauty
and excitement that it can offer, Futsal has started to grow significantly all around the globe in the
last two decades. Growth of this sport was also noticed in European countries where many Futsal
national leagues were launched and respective clubs and national teams are competing in European
competitions organized by UEFA (Union of European Football Associations). In the season
2009/10 domestic champions from 47 countries were competing in the Futsal Cup which is the
Futsal version of “football Champions League”. Furthermore, 39 national teams were competing to
qualify for the Futsal EURO (European Championship for national teams) which will take place in
Hungary in 2010. Excellent achievement for the future development of the sport was also
introduction of Futsal U-21 EURO (European Fusal Championship for national teams under 21
years old) in 2008. Youth national teams from 28 countries were competing in the qualifying
round1.

"Futsal has had a top-down development in the past, and there was a need to create a competition
allowing this discipline to develop at youth level to secure the future of the sport. With the
introduction of this new competition, the national associations will now be inspired to work also at
youth level2." (Laurent Morel, UEFA Competition Manager Futsal)

1
“New tournament begins“, UEFA.com (2008)
2
“Futsal for a new generation”, UEFA.com (2007)

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 8/110 Borut Kukovec


All described facts are confirming that European Futsal recently made a big step forward in terms of
development. However, to really understand how Futsal has developed on a national level in
different European countries a comprehensive research needs to be done. The purpose of this study
is to explore the current situation about Futsal among all 53 European countries that are UEFA
members. Assessment of the situation will be made by choosing several key indicators (Futsal
organization, structure, popularity, prospects, etc.) that will give a good overview how Futsal is
developed in each of the countries. This study will therefore help UEFA to understand the stage of
development of European Futsal and will serve them as a basis for the future steps when working
on the promotion of this attractive sport.

The project has the following objectives:

• To assess the current situation in European Futsal in order to help UEFA with their future
development strategies,
• To make a comprehensive survey which will include all the European countries that are
members of UEFA,
• To provide UEFA with the results of this survey that will include information about
popularity, organization and structure of Futsal in each of the countries and in Europe in
general,
• To provide UEFA with the KPI (key performance indicators) table that will serve as the
comparison when the next (similar) survey will be launched in future to measure the Futsal
progress,
• To provide UEFA with indicators that are characteristic for all more developed Futsal
countries and can serve as Futsal best practices for development.

In order to achieve these objectives survey questionnaire will be prepared and distributed to UEFA
member countries. Received replies will be analysed precisely and presented in a comprehensive
way. All the important findings will be highlighted and explained in details.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 9/110 Borut Kukovec


4. Literature review

There was possible to identify several interesting findings when reviewing literature about emerging
sport, particularly about the process of measuring and evaluating the development progress of a
sports discipline.

According to Hylton (2008, p.236-37), many sports development professionals seem to mistrust
sports evaluation research, perhaps because it is seen to be conducted by “outsiders”. That is the
reason why also insiders should be informed and competent enough to be able to evaluate their
sport by themselves. The first important step is to identify what you need or what is the aim of your
research. The crucial thing is to plan these carefully in order to identify the research challenges and
identify what needs to be done. Planning should ensure that you don’t jump into the research
without proper preparation.

There are some important principles that one should follow when preparing the research (Hylton,
2008, p.237):

1. Define key terms. It is important to be precise about the investigated subject. You have to fully
aware what are you investigating in order to avoid any confusion from your side or respondents in
future steps.

2. Narrow the focus. The important thing is to focus on the specific areas, otherwise the research is
too broad and it doesn’t bring enough specific knowledge.

3. Decide what evidence you will need. It is important to identify what would be the best way to get
necessary answers. Is it better to make a quantity or qualitative research? Who should we interview?
What kind of questions should we ask?

4. Question the (potential) findings. Even before starting the research think about the potential
findings and try to value their reliability. Is there any way that you could avoid potential
unreliability? If not, it is important to make sure that the results are interpreted in a proper way.

According to De Vaus (2002), survey questionnaire is undoubtedly a useful tool if well constructed
and administered but unfortunately it is commonly misused. It is often said that any fool can design

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 10/110 Borut Kukovec


a questionnaire. But the basic skills about the surveys should be acquired prior creation of your own
if one wants it to be useful and bring some important (reliable) findings.

Research methodology that is becoming popular in terms of adaptation and utilization is the Internet
or Web Site survey. The most attractive factors for use of this instrument are not only simplified
designing and more structured results but also an absence of cost and staff time. There are also other
benefits of web based surveys (Mullin, 2007, p.121-22):

• They can be completed within a given time parameter at the discretion of respondents,
• They are inexpensive because no paper, printing, data entry costs are involved,
• Large amounts of data can be collected in a short period of time,
• Received data are already collected in a usable format.

Mullin (2007, p.125) presented some useful tips that one should follow when conducting a survey:

• The researcher should know what kind of answers does he expects to get and what he will
do with each answer,
• Simple and objective questions are easier to interpret than open-ended questions,
• Similar and related questions should be grouped together on the basis of topic areas. They
should have a logical sequence and flow from general to specific.
• The questions should be free of ambiguities,
• Each question should have a distinct purpose and questions may be interrelated and initiated
from the responses of previous questions,
• Survey is a way of communication and it is often good practice to offer a respondent a final
open-ended question to the organization directing the research. This ensures that
communication process is two-way and respondent has an opportunity to express his opinion
about the survey or add any relevant information, propose a question to researcher.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 11/110 Borut Kukovec


5. Research methodology

After the mutual understanding and agreement with the UEFA staff and my supervisor in terms of
the objective and scope of the project, extensive study was carried out in the following ways:

1. Literature about Futsal

Futsal is an emerging sport and there was not a lot of scientific literature available. However, it was
possible to find number of articles on different web pages: UEFA.com, FIFA.com, etc. These
articles with the main Futsal stakeholders (players, coaches, administrators, fans, etc.) helped to
understand the phenomenon of Futsal better and provided s lot of important information for survey
questions.

2. Literature related to sport development evaluation

Specific literature was reviewed on the subject of sport development. It was especially useful to
review the literature regarding research and evaluation of sports development. In the end it had a
significant impact on the way that survey questionnaire was structured and how precisely the
objectives were set.

3. Survey

In order to achieve the research objectives survey was conducted among all the national federations
affiliated to UEFA. Survey has been sent over the e-mail to the representative of Futsal in the
country. More specifically, either to the football federations (if Futsal is governed within football
federation) or separate Futsal governing body (if they have an agreement with national football
federation to govern Futsal in this particular way).

Survey questionnaire (Appendix 1) is composed out of 57 heterogeneous questions3. Most of the


questions were closed ended questions (49), the other 8 questions were open ended. Questionnaire
might seem a bit long but none of the respondents had to answer all the questions because
contingency questions were used. Internet software Questback was used as a platform for the
survey. Since Questback is a professional survey tool it was very convenient for the responders to

3
As you will notice in Appendix 1 questionairre had 62 questions but 5 five of them were introduction questions

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 12/110 Borut Kukovec


use and it also displayed the results in a well-organized and structured way so it was easier make
analyses.

Aim of the survey was to answer the following questions:

• How developed is Futsal on a global European level?


• How popular is Futsal in each of the respective European countries?
• How is Futsal structured and governed?
• When has Futsal started and what were the main triggers for development of Futsal in
different countries?
• What is level of media interest for Futsal in respective countries?
• What is the financial status of clubs in different countries?
• What are the obstacles that are preventing Futsal to grow (even) more in different countries?
• How will the countries promote Futsal in future?
• What are the common indicators among different countries that allow Futsal to grow faster
in one and slower in another country?

After collecting all information, statistical analyses of the results have been made in order to make a
general assessment of the current situation of Futsal in Europe and to identify what are the key
indicators that enable Futsal to grow more in some of the countries.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 13/110 Borut Kukovec


6. European Futsal survey results

In order to reach research goals and make a general assessment about European Futsal, an extensive
survey was conducted. It has been sent to all 53 European Futsal governing bodies (or football
governing bodies if Futsal is under their umbrella). Contacts of people responsible for Futsal in each
of the countries were provided by UEFA Futsal competition Manager, Mr. Morel. The survey has
been launched on September 10 and finished on October 23. It was a great challenge to get replies
from all the countries but with persistency and hard work this target was achieved. A lot of
respondents found the survey interesting and made a special request to be informed about the final
results.

In Appendix 1 you can find the survey questionnaire, while the profile (occupation with Futsal: full-
time, part-time, volunteer) of the respondents can be find in Appendix 2. Questions in the survey
were related to the different indicators and results will be insightfully analysed in this chapter.

Luxemburg, Liechtenstein, Faroe Islands had to answer only few questions because FIFA version of
Futsal is not played in their countries yet. Their current problems and future plans about Futsal will
be explained in the end.

KPI table has been created to present the results of the survey from country to country. Indicators
that were selected are measurable and KPI table shall serve as a platform for the future comparisons
when similar survey will be launched in future. Table can be found in the Appendix 27.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 14/110 Borut Kukovec


6.1 Highlights & Key figures

• Official version of FIFA Futsal is played in 50 European countries (UEFA members).

• There are more than 10.000 registered players per country on average.

• There are approximately 11 million recreational players in Europe.

• Women’s Futsal is played and managed in 17 European countries.

• In 66% of the countries Futsal is governed by a Futsal section or department (not an


independent federation) that is contained within the national football association.

• In national Futsal governing bodies averagely from 1-2 people are working full-time and
another 2-3 people are working part time.

• 45 countries have established a national Futsal league.

• 45% of the countries have at least 3 different league levels.

• Average attendance of top division league matches (season 2008/09) in European countries
was approximately 450 spectators.

• Average budget of a top division club in European national leagues is between 10.000 –
50.000 EUR.

• In 52% of the countries league matches are shown on TV (live, replay, highlights)

• Internet & New Media was identified as the primary Futsal media.

• Lack of financial resources and dominant position of football are the most influential
factors that are preventing Futsal to grow (even) more in European countries.

• Higher on the educational institutions pyramid you progress more is Futsal played,

• Among different age groups Youth (16-25 years old) and Adult (26 – 40 years old) are the
biggest Futsal stakeholders (players and fans).

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 15/110 Borut Kukovec


6.2 FIFA official version

FIFA official version of Futsal is the one that completely complies with the FIFA rules 4 about the
size of the pitch, type of the ball used, number of players, duration of the match, etc.
Results have shown that FIFA Futsal is played almost in all European countries, except in
Liechtenstein, Luxemburg and Faroe Islands. Therefore Futsal as a sports discipline practically
completed its diffusion around the European continent and has confirmed its enormous potential for
the future development.

For more detailed information see Apendix 3.

6.3 Leisure sport

In rare countries (3) Futsal has been played as a leisure sport already before 1960. In the 1960’s
Futsal has managed to diffuse to eight other countries. In the 1970’s this growth has stopped before
in the 1980’s again reached the same growth rate of development as in 1960’s. Period from 1991-95
was the period of the biggest growth of leisure Futsal in the history of this sport. In the period of 5
years Futsal got its amateur players in 9 European countries. Similar growth has happened in the
first five years of this century when last European countries were convinced by excitement and
attractiveness of Futsal. After 2005 the expansion of leisure Futsal has finished and it’s now played
almost over the whole Europe.

For more detailed information see Appendix 4.

6.4 Competitive sport

Before 1990, Futsal has been played competitively only in few European countries. However, after
this year its growth has started before reaching its peak in 1997 when official national club
competition was established in five countries. This was followed by the period of slow growth (1-2
countries per year established official national club competitions) before another highlight has
happened in 2006 when another six countries has decided to introduce national competitions. After

4
Source: Futsal Laws of the game 2008, FIFA.com (2008)

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 16/110 Borut Kukovec


that year the growth has decreased as a logical consequence of the fact that Futsal is now played
competitively in a big majority of European countries.

For more detailed information see Appendix 5.

6.5 Influential factors for development of Futsal

Sometimes it is useful to look back to the history to better understand the process of development of
a sport, in our case Futsal. Therefore specific triggers for development can be identified and best
practices can be shared among countries. The most interesting answers provided by the respondents
will be presented in the following points:

• Hosting UEFA Futsal Tournaments and launch of the National Futsal League and Regional
Futsal Competitions,
• Weather conditions during winter time,
• Number of regional non – professional tournaments,
• Popularity as the leisure sport for people from 10 – 60 years old,
• Group of Futsal enthusiasts who worked hard to develop the sport,
• Cooperation and integration in the Football association – they were keen to explore if Futsal
is beneficial as a football skill development tool,
• Support from the football clubs to have their own Futsal team,
• Significant number of sport halls was built,
• Lack of football fields,
• Good results of top clubs and a national team on international level,
• Bad financial situation or financial crisis.

6.6 Futsal/Football players registration

Analyses have shown that in 70% of the European countries (35) they give different licenses to the
Futsal and football players. This indicator is very important for the future development of Futsal
because having separate registration system for Futsal players will help countries to monitor
development of this sport more accurately (growth rates of registered players).

For more detailed information see Appendix 6.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 17/110 Borut Kukovec


6.7 Number of registered Futsal players

Before starting to analyse this indicator it needs to be clarified that some numbers provided by
Futsal governing bodies, especially from the countries that don’t have a separate Futsal player’s
registration system, might be less reliable and accurate. Futsal is a very young sport in some of the
countries and it was possible to predict these kinds of difficulties. However, in the end it was still
possible to determine the extent of the European Futsal family in terms of registered players.

“There are approximately 500.000 registered Futsal players in Europe.”

Looking at this figure it needs to be stressed out that 20 % of the countries bring more than 90% of
total registered players in European countries. As an example, Spain as itself has 110.000 registered
players, closely followed by Sweden, Italy and Netherlands who all have more than 65.000
registered players. According to this data it is possible to make inferences that number of registered
players Futsal players in Europe is enviable but it is concentrated in few European countries. On the
other hand it shows that future of Futsal can be promising if countries with less registered players
will manage to follow the leading ones.

6.8 Number of unregistered players

It was hard for the Futsal governing bodies to estimate the number of unregistered (occasional,
amateur) players because it is extremely hard to measure this category. Anyway, from the received
estimations it was possible to get an approximate number.

“There are approximately 11 million unregistered Futsal players in Europe.”

According to the FIFA Big count research in 20065, there were 61 million unregistered football
players in Europe. Considering this data, having 11 million of Futsal players is a great achievement
and is confirming that popularity of Futsal in Europe is considerable.

5
Source: Big count 2006, FIFA.com (2007)

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 18/110 Borut Kukovec


6.9 Restrictive rules Futsal/football rules

In big majority of countries Futsal is in close relation to football. In many of them they have players
who have decided to play Futsal instead of football or the opposite, or players who are playing both
Futsal and football. In some of the countries, Futsal or football governing body has decided to
implement certain restrictions in order to prevent high profile football players to play Futsal or the
opposite. Aim of this question was to examine how many countries have implemented these kinds
of restrictions in order to make a theoretical conclusion about which option is better for
development of Futsal.

Analyses of the results have shown that European Futsal nations are incredible equally divided into
two parts. 50% of the countries have restrictions for players who want to participate in both sports
and 50% don’t have restrictions.

For more detailed information see Appendix 7.

In the following points you can find examples of restrictions:

• If you are a registered football player playing in football top division you are not allowed to
play Futsal in first two divisions,
• A registered football player playing in football top three divisions (1st, 2nd and 3rd) is not
allowed to play Futsal in first two top divisions (1st and 2nd league),
• You need a written permission from your football club to be allowed to play Futsal,
• They can play both sports, but only for the same club. They cannot play football in one club
and Futsal in another club,
• Player can register only for one sport: Futsal or football,
• From the first division club only one player can play Futsal and from second division club
three players can play Futsal.

All things considered, it is hard to judge which of the two options is better. Even among the most
successful European Futsal nations there are those, who do not have restrictions (Spain, Russia,
Belarus, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Netherlands, etc.) and the ones with restrictions (Italy, Portugal,
Ukraine, Serbia, Romania, Slovenia). However, some views about this indicator will be presented
later in a Chapter 7 about more developed Futsal nations and best practices.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 19/110 Borut Kukovec


6.10 Youth national teams competition

In the introduction part of this research was mentioned that in 2008 first European Futsal
U-21 championship was organized. 28 countries was involved in the qualifying round and they
were fighting for seven places on the final tournament in Russia (their team was qualified directly
as they were host). Since the tournament has been later removed from the UEFA competition
schedule, the aim of this question was to explore how many countries would take part in a similar
competition if it would have been re-launched. Countries also had an opportunity to choose the age
category in which they would prefer to compete in (U-17, U-19 and U-21).

The results have shown that 32 European countries would participate in the European competition
for youth national teams, if the one would be organized. It might be also interesting to know that
only 3 countries had answered that they wouldn’t compete while other 15 countries don’t know at
the moment and would take that decision later.

27 out of 32 countries that are interested to take part in potential youth competition would prefer to
compete in age group of U-21 (under 21 years old)., 3 countries U-17 and other 2 countries U-19.

For more detailed information see Appendix 8.

Moreover, there is definitely a great interest from the countries to have a European competition for
youth national teams, ideally in U-21 age category. Having youth players involved is essential for
the future development of the every single sport and it also gives more negotiation power to the
national Futsal governing bodies when they try to convince the football association (this example is
given because in big majority of the countries Futsal is under the football association umbrella) that
it is important to support and promote Futsal among youth.

6.11 Women’s Futsal

Women’s football increased popularity in recent years brings curiosity if the same trend (is) has
been (will be) followed in Futsal. The goal of this indicator about women’s Futsal was not only to
identify in how many of the countries is women’s Futsal organized but also in how many of them is
managed on a national or/and regional level.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 20/110 Borut Kukovec


Analyses of the results have shown that women’s Futsal is organized (played in an organized way)
in 20 countries, in 17 of them is also managed on a national or regional level.

Picture 1: Women’s Futsal in 2009 (green colour – organized, red colour – unorganized)

From 30 countries which answered that women’s Futsal is not organized in their country, 19 of
them plans to start it in future. On the following picture it is possible to see how the future
European map of women’s Futsal is expected to look like.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 21/110 Borut Kukovec


Picture 2: Women’s Futsal in the future (green colour – organized, red colour – unorganized)

According to the results, women’s Futsal has already established itself in almost half of the
European countries. As another half is expected to join them soon there is definitely enormous
potential to develop the female part of the sport as well.

For more detailed information see Appendix 9.

6.12 Governance of Futsal

Effective governance is one of the key factors for development of every sport. That is the reason
why it is important to know how European Futsal is governed on a national level. Analyses of the
results have shown that in 66% of the countries (33) Futsal is governed within a national football
association (FA) as a Futsal section or department. In 20% of the cases (10 countries) Futsal is
governed by an independent Futsal federation integrated within the FA, while in three of the
countries Futsal is governed outside the FA but they there is a contractual agreement between the
two bodies. Other types of governance are very rare.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 22/110 Borut Kukovec


These results are certainly displaying the trend of Futsal governance among different countries.
However, it is difficult to decide which type of governance is the most effective one. But one thing
is almost certain – Futsal needs assistance (financial and technical support) from football
association to develop itself.

For more detailed information see Appendix 10.

6.13 Futsal administration

Goal of this indicator was to identify how many members of the staff national governing body
employs for Futsal administration. Results have shown that on average there are 1-2 people (1,70)
employed full-time and 2-3 people (2,42) part-time.

On the one hand it may be interesting to know that 26% of the countries have no one employed full-
time, but on the other hand 42% of the countries have 2 or more full-time employees. Five countries
even have 6 or more people employed for Futsal administration. Results about part-time employees
are quite identical. 29% of the countries don’t have part-time Futsal administration employees,
while 56% of the countries have 2 or more people employed. 10 countries have 6 or more people
part-time Futsal administration employees.

In total, there are around 90 full-time and 130 part-time employees working in European countries
on Futsal administration.

For more detailed information see Appendix 11.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 23/110 Borut Kukovec


6.14 National Futsal league

National Futsal leagues are organized in 45 European countries6. Furthermore, three out of eight
nations that don’t have a national Futsal league yet, will establish a league in between the next 5
years period.

Picture 3: National Futsal leagues ( green colour – league, red colour – no league)

Most of the national leagues have been established in 1990’s, only few countries had their
respective leagues earlier. It might be interesting to know that until 1996 there were “only” 16
national leagues organized in Europe and than in 1997 seven additional countries decided to follow
them. It is possible to say that 1997 was really a breakthrough year for Futsal because after that
almost every year from 2-3 new national leagues were created.
For more detailed information see Appendix 12.

6
According to results 44 countries stated that they have a national league. Ukraine was additionally added to this group
of countries because they have a tournament (high division) that can be called league and winner represents Ukraine in
Futsal Cup. That is also the reason why all the analyses were made with 44 countries and not 45.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 24/110 Borut Kukovec


6.14.1 League levels & number of clubs per level

Out of the countries with a national Futsal league, 10 of them has only one league level, 14 of them
has two league levels, while other 20 countries has three or more league levels. These statistics are
definitely proving that there is a lot of demand to play Futsal in European countries, especially in
the countries with Futsal tradition. It is expected that most of the other countries will follow them in
future.

For more detailed information see Appendix 13.

On average, there are approximately 12 clubs are competing in the first division. Having 12 clubs in
elite division is also the most often used format followed by the ones with 10 and 8 clubs. In second
division there are on average approximately 16 clubs competing, although it needs to be
emphasized that in 1/3 of the countries that have second division they have 21 or more clubs
competing in it ( in some of them even more than 30). In half of the European countries with Futsal
third division they have more than 30 clubs competing in it. However, average number of clubs in a
third division is 20. Fourth, fifth and sixth division are only played in few European countries and
there are on average approximately 18 clubs competing in it.

For more detailed information see Appendix 14.

All things considered, is it possible to make assumptions what kind of league format is the best? It
seems that the best Futsal countries with a lot of registered players (Spain, Russia, Portugal, and
Italy) prefer to make first division with 12-16 clubs competing and second division with up to 30
clubs competing. On lower league levels there are more than 30 clubs competing. They have an
interesting league system in Netherlands and Czech Republic where on all league levels 12 clubs
are competing.

In 84% of the countries all league levels are played indoors. In countries where some league levels
are played outdoors, usually this is the case with lower league levels (from third division down).

For more detailed information see Appendix 15.

6.14.2 Average and highest attendance in top division

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 25/110 Borut Kukovec


In some of the countries where Futsal leagues have just been launched they had some problems
providing data about the average and highest attendance in their top division. Either they didn’t
have this information or there is practically no spectators present in their country because Futsal has
just started to develop. There were also other more developed Futsal countries that had some
problems defining the figures about number of spectators on their national league matches. It has to
be stressed out that having spectators is crucial for development of every sport so it is important to
measure and evaluate this numbers on regular basis.

Analyses have shown that European average is 460 spectators on a national league match.
However, it needs to be emphasized that gap between the countries is tremendous. On the one hand
there are countries like Spain, Russia, Romania and Italy with high attendance (from 1500 – 3000
spectators/match) but on the other hand we have a group of countries with very low attendance –
less than 50 (Scotland, England, Albania, Georgia, etc.). Majority of the countries has an average
attendance close to the total average of countries mentioned above.

Regarding the highest attendance it might be interesting to know that if we make a sum up of all the
highest attendances in different countries we would have 68.000 Futsal spectators in 43 national
leagues. This would mean that on average around 1.600 people would see a top division match
which is definitely a decent number for an indoor sport. Again the gap between the countries needs
to be emphasized but most of the countries are close to the average.

6.14.3 Average and the highest budget – top division club

Analyses of the results have shown that in 42% of countries their top division clubs have a budget
of less than 10.000 EUR. Furthermore, in 72% of the countries the average budget is lower than
50.000 EUR and in only 14% of the countries the average budget is higher than 100.000 EUR.
Russia, Italy and Kazakhstan are the countries with the highest average budget of over 500.000
EUR.

Average budget of a top division club in European national leagues is in a range between 10.000 –
50.000 EUR.

For more detailed information see Appendix 16.

Allocation of the countries is similar when it comes to the highest budget of a top division club.
However, differences between countries are even more significant. Again countries like Russia,

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 26/110 Borut Kukovec


Italy and Kazakhstan are dominating the figures and they are the only countries in which clubs
budgets exceed 1 million EUR, in Russia it is even possible to speak about few million EUR. In
most of the other countries the highest budget is bellow 100.000 EUR and rarely up to 300.000
EUR.

Average of the highest budgets of a top division club in European national leagues is approximately
380.000 EUR.

6.14.4 TV coverage

For some sports TV revenues are one of the main sources of incomes. Unfortunately, it is still too
early to expect that Futsal would be able to attract major TV coverage. However, this is certainly
something that countries should aim for in future. Futsal is a TV sport and it is crucial for future
development that it becomes visible to the wider audience.

According to the results, Futsal league matches are shown on TV in 52% of the countries with a
national Futsal league. In most of them matches are shown on regional and national TV channels.
According to the results, it is possible to say that Futsal receives most TV coverage in Italy,
Romania, Russia, Czech Republic and Spain.

Regional TV channel coverage

In 65% of the countries with TV coverage, national league matches are shown on regional TV.
Majority of these countries had great difficulties defining details about broadcasters’ potential
audience, accumulated number of viewers, average and highest number of viewers per match.
Either they didn’t have the information to answer this question or the answer was incomplete.
Considering this fact is hard to make any conclusions about broadcasters profile and number of
viewers. It would be important for representatives of the national Futsal governing bodies to have
this information available in future, especially when trying to sell Futsal as a product to the
sponsors.

According to the results, regional TV channels are showing national league on average around 30
hours per season. However, there are also some countries where national league is shown more than
100 hours/season (Italy, Czech Republic). Live coverage, replays and highlights are the forms of

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 27/110 Borut Kukovec


coverage that are on average equally represented. It was encouraging to recognize that replays of
Futsal matches are also attractive for the broadcasters (TV viewers).

For more detailed information see Appendix 17.

National TV channel coverage

In 70% of the countries with TV coverage, top division matches are shown on national TV. Most of
the respondents had problems to define the broadcasters profile and number of viewers. However, it
was possible to get some figures from specific countries. In Italy average number of viewers is
50.000 and the highest number was 700.000. In Spain there are on average 350.000 viewers per
match and in Russia there are 3-4% of total audience (TV rating) Futsal top division matches.

Results about hours of coverage per year are similar to the ones from the regional TV channels
(approximately 30 hours/season). National league matches are frequently showed live or as a replay
(both 62,5%), highlights are shown in 38% of the countries with national TV channel coverage.

For more detailed information see Appendix 18.

All things considered, Futsal has shown its growth also in terms of penetration to the different TV
channels. It is nice to become aware that domestic league matches are shown on national (also
regional) TV channels in many European countries. But there is certainly a feeling that much more
could be done regarding this matter. However, it might be also possible that Internet and New
Media will diminish the development of Futsal on TV but it is crucial for development of this sport
that it gets as much visibility as it can.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 28/110 Borut Kukovec


6.14.5 Media & national Futsal league

Figure 1: Importance of different media categories for national league

According to the results, the most important media category for a national league is Internet & New
Media. It is also important to emphasize that this media category was rated as very important by 23
countries, while 11 countries rated it as important. These results are showing that Internet is already
serving as a great promotion tool for Futsal. Countries that didn’t yet recognize the importance of
this media category shall definitely take advantage of it in future.

Internet & New Media are closely followed by Written press media category (newspapers,
magazines, etc.). For someone it might be a surprise but 34 countries rated this media category as
important or very important for their national league. It seems that Futsal is still mostly relying on
traditional media like newspapers and magazines but with the increasing importance of Internet &
New Media this trend will most likely change in future.

The third most important media category is TV. When analysing this result it needs to be
emphasized that there were two groups of countries answering this question. In the first group were
the countries that have TV coverage of their national league and in the second group were the
countries that don’t have it. Countries with the TV coverage obviously rated this category very high
because being present TV is a very powerful promotion tool (21 countries rated it as very
important). While for the ones that don’t have TV coverage obviously this category doesn’t have
the importance (18 countries rated it as less or not important). And that is most likely the reason
why on average TV is on the third place, behind Internet & New Media and Written press.
MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 29/110 Borut Kukovec
Not surprisingly, Radio was rated as the least important media category. On the one hand there were
15 countries who rated this media category as not important and 11 of them as less important but on
the other hand there were 18 countries who rated it as important or even very important. These
results are showing that Radio has completely lost importance in some countries but in some other
has still kept its position as an important media category for Futsal.

For more detailed information see Appendix 19.

6.15. Evolution of Futsal media coverage in the last 5 years

Goal of this question was to identify a global trend about Futsal media coverage in European
countries in the last 5 years. After reviewing the results it was possible to recognize (on average)
slow growing interest from the media for Futsal. Interestingly, in most of the countries the evolution
of media coverage was average growing interest but because there are 12 countries with no general
interest for Futsal the average is lower. The gap between countries was again noticeable but this is
again consequence of the fact that in some of the countries Futsal is a very young sport while in
others it has a longer tradition.

All things considered, interest of media to report and offer coverage to Futsal is not on the level as
one would want it to be. However, interest is slowly increasing and should increase even more if
Futsal administrators will continue to work hard to get more media exposure. It is crucial that the
administrators seriously consider how they will make their Futsal events more attractive for the
media, sponsors, spectators, etc.

For more detailed information see Appendix 20.

6.16 Futsal growth obstacles

Up to this stage this report has shown that Futsal has achieved a decent growth in recent years all
around the Europe. However, the goal of this question was to recognize the main obstacles
(influential factors) that are preventing Futsal to grow (even) more in European countries.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 30/110 Borut Kukovec


Figure 2: European Futsal growth obstacles

The most influential factor that is preventing Futsal to grow is a lack of financial resources. Low
involvements of the media and low attendance (with exception of few countries) are not attracting
sufficient sponsorship funds that would enable Futsal to progress even more. Some of the countries,
especially the ones without Futsal tradition, have found themselves in a vicious circle (low quality
product, low attendance, low media interest, lack of sponsors, low incomes – not enough money to
invest to improve the product).
90% of the countries have rated this factor as the important or very important one.

The second most important factor that is preventing Futsal to grow is dominant position of football.
In most of the countries where Futsal is played, football already has a long tradition and is very
popular. Therefore it receives a lot of media coverage, sponsorship funds, number of spectators,
etc., and it is very hard for Futsal to compete with football for all these stakeholders.
88% of the countries rated this factor as the important or very important one.

Hall availability is the third most important factor that is preventing Futsal to grow. In some of the
countries there is a general lack of halls while in others countries they have number of halls but they
are already occupied with other sports. Futsal is an indoor sport and not having enough halls
available certainly represents a limitation to the further development of this sport.
70% of the countries rated this factor as the important or very important one.

European countries have rated limited interested from the media as the fourth biggest obstacle for
development of Futsal. As expected, bigger differences between the answers were noticed here.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 31/110 Borut Kukovec


Countries where Futsal has been well established rated this factor much lower than the ones in
which Futsal has just started and wasn’t able to attract a lot of media interest yet. In those countries
this might be even the biggest obstacle because it is closely related (and leads) to the lack of
financial resources.
66% of the countries rated this factor as the important or very important one.

Lack of the professional management of the clubs is the next influential factor that is preventing
Futsal to grow. Limited financial resources in many of the countries are not allowing clubs to hire
professional staff that would run the clubs in a way that it would be attracting for the fans, sponsors,
media, etc. This factor is undoubtedly slowing down the development process of Futsal.
66% of the countries rated this factor as the important or very important one.

Competition from other indoor sports, lack of support from the football governing body and a lack
of Futsal tradition are the last three factors on the ranking. However, there were on average still
rated in between of somewhat important and important so they shouldn’t be underestimated. A bit
surprisingly, European countries see the lack of the Futsal tradition as the least important obstacle
that is preventing this sport to grow.

For more detailed information see Appendix 21.

6.17 Futsal stakeholders interest

6.17.1 Futsal & different age groups

In order to identify how the people of different age are interested in playing, watching and
following Futsal, population was divided into four different age groups: Children (5-15), Youth (16-
25), Adult (26-40) and Senior (above 40). All the countries had to select one of the four levels of
interest (1-no interest, 2-low, 3-medium, 4-high) for each age group.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 32/110 Borut Kukovec


Futsal players

Figure 3: Level of interest to play Futsal among different age groups

Analyses of the results have shown that the highest level of interest comes from Youth and Adult
age group. On the average their level of interest is between medium and high (closer to medium).
There were some anecdotes before, that especially Children (up to 15 years old) are interested in
playing Futsal. However, according to results their level of interest is about the same than the one
from Seniors (between low and medium) and much lower than the one from Youth and Adult. If the
results about Children’s interest might be a negative surprise it is just the opposite with Seniors. It is
very promising to know that this part of population is showing decent level of interest to play Futsal
as well because one of the biggest strengths of Futsal is that can be played by people of all different
ages, even the ones who are in less good physical shape.

For more detailed information see Appendix 22.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 33/110 Borut Kukovec


Futsal fans

Figure 4: Level of interest to watch and follow Futsal among different age groups

Adult age group is the most interested in watching and following Futsal. On average they have a
medium level of interest. They are closely followed by Youth, while Seniors came third
(low/medium interest). Not surprisingly, Children age group is the one that is least interest in
watching and following Futsal. They are not yet financially independent and they don’t follow
media in such an extent.

For more detailed information see Appendix 23.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 34/110 Borut Kukovec


6.17.2 Futsal and sponsors

Figure 5: Level of interest of sponsors to support Futsal

Goal of this indicator was to identify the level of interest (1-no interest, 2-low, 3-medium, 4-high)
of companies and public entities (municipalities, regional authorities, state) to financially support
Futsal. Unfortunately the results have shown that interest of all these institutions is low. However,
this means that there is some interest and these results are the consequence of the fact that in most
of the countries Futsal doesn’t yet attract high level of media interest and great number of
spectators. Considering this fact one could say that these results are not so bad and should only
improve in future (especially for companies).

For more detailed information see Appendix 24.

6.17.3 Futsal and educational institutions

Respondents were asked if FIFA Futsal is played on different levels of educational institutions
(obligatory/primary school, obligatory/secondary/high school, college/university) in their countries
and what is the level of interest to support (no interest, low, medium, high) Futsal of these
institutions.

The results have shown that higher on the educational pyramid we move, the more is Futsal played.
For example, Futsal is played in obligatory/primary schools in 16 countries, in
MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 35/110 Borut Kukovec
obligatory/secondary/high schools in 24 countries and on colleges/universities in 32 countries (out
of 50 European countries that play Futsal at the moment). Especially in the obligatory/primary
schools (but also on other educational levels) they play football variations that are close to FIFA
Futsal but there are some differences like playing with walls, playing 5+1, without Futsal ball, no
time-stopping, etc. Changing these small differences (providing educational institutions with Futsal
balls or educate them about the rules of the game) might have an important impact future
development of Futsal in some countries. Similar promotions were already successfully
implemented in Germany7.

For more detailed information see Appendix 25.

Unsurprisingly, when measuring level of interest to support Futsal by educational institutions the
results were quite similar to the ones about playing Futsal. Highest level of interest is shown by
colleges/universities (low/medium) and it is closely followed by secondary/high schools
(low/medium) while primary schools are the ones that show least interest (low).

Figure 6: Level of interest of educational institutions to support Futsal (1-no interest, 2-low, 3-medium, 4–high)

Moreover, it is possible to make a conclusion that Futsal is mainly supported and mostly played in
Colleges/Universities. However, this trend could definitely change in future especially considering
the fact that many of expertise emphasize positive elements that Futsal can have on the
development of young football players. Not only that, Futsal is also a sport that is much faster than

7
“DFB Futsal Cup makes successful debut”, FIFA.com

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 36/110 Borut Kukovec


normal football and a lot more goals are scored, as a player you can have more ball possession and
that is the reason why it could be sometimes even more attractive than association football to
children. And Futsal should recognize and use this potential and strength.

6.18 European Futsal perspective

How bright is the European Futsal future? In order to find the answer on this question each of the
countries was asked to predict the Futsal development and what will be their actions to promote the
sport. According to their answers Futsal has a bright future in big majority of the European
countries. They expect that number of players (professional and amateur), clubs and competitions
will increase and in many of the countries long-term Futsal development plans were created.

It is also important to emphasize that some successful football nations ( England, Germany), in
which Futsal is less established at the moment due a long tradition of other variations of football
played, have serious plans to promote Futsal in future and make it popular in their country. Great
potential and willingness to promote Futsal was also recognized in Scandinavian and South Eastern
European countries if they manage to finance prepared programmes and in some of them, solve the
problem of halls availability.

In the following points it is possible find the most interesting planned activities that should enable
the growth of European Futsal:

• Promotion among youth population (establishment of U-21, U-19 or/and U-17 leagues,
creation Futsal schools/centres),
• Promotion among women’s (creation of national league and a national team),
• Increase the media coverage of national league (education of journalists about Futsal,
finding a media partner, assure TV or internet coverage of the first division league matches,
employ media officer ),
• Attract sponsors for a national league (offer them special packages and visibility),
• Improve Futsal facilities (support building of Futsal halls, cooperation with private
companies),
• Increase popularity of Futsal in educational institutions (free distribution of Futsal balls,
creation of school/university leagues),
• Promotion on a regional level (organization of many amateur regional tournaments),

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 37/110 Borut Kukovec


• Increase number of international matches played (more national team friendly games,
compete in European Futsal competitions),
• Organization of major international competitions (Futsal Cup tournaments, Futsal EURO,
Futsal World Cup, etc.),
• Educational courses for coaches (over the internet and through seminars),
• Increase number of league levels and/or teams playing in one division,
• Promotion over the internet web pages and special Futsal magazines,
• Improve cooperation with football clubs (integrate Futsal in established football clubs youth
academies),
• Improve structure and organization of a national league (implementation of licensing for
clubs – similar to football, improve marketing of the league).

Countries are fully aware of the Futsal potential and have already identified tools how to promote
the sport in future. However, some of them have raised some concerns especially regarding the
current financial situation that could potentially delay the process of development. This problem
was also emphasized by some of the most developed Futsal countries. Nevertheless, this is not only
a problem of Futsal at the moment – whole sport industry is facing this problem and the situation
will definitely change in the future.

6.19 Liechtenstein, Faroe Islands & Luxemburg

As already mentioned before, Liechtenstein, Faroe Islands and Luxemburg are the only UEFA
member countries that don’t play FIFA version of Futsal yet. In Faroe Island and Liechtenstein
unfortunately don’t have any plans to start with Futsal in the near future. Main reasons for this
decision two: lack of players and playing grounds. On the other hand, Luxemburg is planning to
join European Futsal family very soon. They plan to create a national team in 2010 and launch a
national league in 2-3 years time. This means that number of European countries that play FIFA
Futsal will soon increase to 51.

6.20 Comments & suggestions

In the last question of the survey respondents had an opportunity to express their opinion about the
survey or any other issue regarding European Futsal. They were also welcomed to give their own
suggestions about future development of Futsal.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 38/110 Borut Kukovec


Here some of the most interesting and/or frequent answers:

» We would particularly like for UEFA to begin a promotional campaign featuring quotations from
high profile footballers speaking about how Futsal helped develop their skills as a child. I believe
this is hugely important to help develop grassroots Futsal and has been influential in getting media
to take notice of the game. »

» We wish that UEFA would re-launch the U-21 Futsal competition in order to secure the Futsal
future. »

»It would be great if UEFA would organize more educational seminars for coaches, referees and
administrators . »

» Having been involved with the sport for many years and been fortunate to have met many new
friends and enthusiasts through the game I personally find it very difficult to maintain the
motivation to keep up the battle against a national association which has many other important
issues. Funding for Futsal is not the only aspect of sport which is finding the recession difficult. The
national game of football is also falling on hard time so it is understandable that the governing body
is unable to financially support Futsal. Unfortunately it seems that any funding which goes from
UEFA/FIFA to the FA does not necessarily find its way to the Futsal organisers. I believe UEFA
have created an excellent tournament in the UEFA Futsal Cup and should be commended in this
regard. »

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 39/110 Borut Kukovec


7. Futsal best practices

Is there anything to learn from experiences of more developed Futsal countries?

In Europe we can divide Futsal countries in three different groups: (1) developed, (2) developing
and (3) undeveloped. Undeveloped Futsal countries are those in which Futsal has started only
recently. For them it might be important to know how is Futsal organized and structured in more
developed Futsal countries from the first and to some extend also from the second group. All the
8
European countries that are among the top 20 countries in the world on the ELO-based ranking
were taken as a sample. They were analyzed through the different indicators and here are the
results:

Tradition

From the survey results is evident that Futsal tradition is playing a big role in the development of
Futsal. Most of the developed Futsal countries have started to play Futsal as a leisure sport already
in 60’s or at least in 80’s/early 90’s. Therefore Futsal has already been played for one or two
decades before they have started to play it on a competitive level. By now only one country that
started with Futsal after 2000 (Romania) is among top European Futsal nations.

Development factors

In some of the most successful countries like Spain and Russia, Futsal has developed through small
regional tournaments. For these two countries we can say that Futsal has started to grow from the
bottom of the pyramid – first as a leisure sport and then as competitive. In other countries (Portugal)
there was a “push” from football clubs to promote the sport in order to still have presence of
“variation of football” during the break time of the football season. It is also not possible to develop
Futsal if you don’t have enough halls available. Futsal is an indoor sport and having enough halls
available was a vital factor in some countries for the development of the sport.

8
As of September 21, 2009 the top 20 teams according to the ELO-based rankings are: Spain, Italy, Portugal, Russia,
Ukraine, Serbia, Belarus, Romania, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Belgium and Netherlands ( Futsal world
ranking on 21.09.2009)

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 40/110 Borut Kukovec


Registrations of the players

Big majority of the most successful Futsal countries distinguishes between the registrations of
Futsal and football players in terms of a license. This helps them to develop and monitor the
progress of the Futsal more efficiently and it is definitely an indicator that other Futsal countries
shall (should) follow.

Restrictive rules: Futsal /football players

According to the survey results it is hard to assert that having restrictive rules for Futsal players
(they are not allowed to play football and the opposite) helps countries to develop Futsal. Some of
the best Futsal nations like Spain and Russia for example don’t have any restrictive rules but on the
other hand you have countries like Serbia, Romania and Slovenia who have restrictive rules and
have made a significant progress in recent years. It might be possible to assume that if Futsal has
only started to develop in a country than these kinds restrictive rules help Futsal in terms of quality
because this system encourages emergence of Futsal specialists (players).

Governance of Futsal

From the survey results it is possible to assert that having a Futsal section or department (not an
independent federation) that is contained within the national football association (FA) or an
independent Futsal federation integrated within the FA are the best options for the governance of
Futsal. However, it is hard to judge which one is better both options bring success to different
countries.

Futsal governing body administration staff

Top European Futsal governing bodies are on average run by 3 full-time and 3 part-time working
staff. There is only one exception (Portugal) whose governing body employs only 1 full-time staff
even if they are one of the best Futsal nations.

National Futsal league

Not surprisingly, all the European leading Futsal nations (except Ukraine) have a national league.
Most of them were established in early 90’s. On average they have 3-4 league levels (all levels are
played indoors) and 12-16 clubs are competing in a top division. Average attendance on top

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 41/110 Borut Kukovec


division matches is around 1000 spectators, with the highest numbers in Spain and Russia (2500).
Maybe it is a coincidence but it was possible to see the correlation between the World Futsal
rankings and average attendance in league matches (more spectators, higher on the rankings). Clubs
that are competing in a top division leagues have between 50.000 – 100.000 EUR of budget. On
average clubs have the highest budget in Russia, Spain and Romania.

National Futsal top division on TV

With rare exceptions, all the leading European Futsal nations have TV coverage of national Futsal
top division. Matches are usually shown on national and regional TV channels on average between
31 – 50 hours per season. There is a lot of live coverage which is followed by highlights and
replays. Countries where Futsal gets the most TV coverage are Russia, Romania and Czech
Republic. According to the survey results it is possible to make a conclusion that is hard to be one
of best Futsal nations in Europe and develop Futsal without being present on TV.

Futsal and different media’s

TV is the most important media, closely followed by Internet & New Media and written press.
Unsurprisingly, Radio is convincingly the least important media. During the last five years, most of
the top European Futsal nations have noticed average growing interest of media.

What is preventing Futsal to grow (even more)?

Lack of financial resources and dominant position of football are the most influential factors that
are preventing Futsal to grow faster. One of the biggest problems for the development of the Futsal
is also limited hall availability in some of the countries and lack of professional management of the
clubs.

Futsal in educational institutions

Elite European Futsal countries (Spain, Portugal, Russia) have Futsal present in all different levels
of educational institutions (Obligatory/primary schools, secondary/high schools,
College/University). Considering these information it is possible to make assumption that Futsal
needs to be played in these institutions if you want to develop it to the highest level. Most of the
other countries youngsters play Futsal only in Universities/Colleges. Interestingly, in some of the

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 42/110 Borut Kukovec


countries Futsal is not played in any of the educational institutions because youngsters don’t play
according to the FIFA Futsal rules.

Furthermore, Futsal is played among youth in those countries, where educational institutions are
ready to support it. Unfortunately this is not the case in many of the top European Futsal countries,
which is definitely slowing down development progress of Futsal.

Level of interest to PLAY Futsal

Considering the top European Futsal nations, most of the people that are interested to play Futsal
are from 16-40 years old. Only some of the nations have a high level of interest from children
(Portugal, Russia, Serbia and Netherlands) and seniors (Slovakia, Slovenia). However, it is again
possible to notice that the top 6 European countries on Futsal world ranking have medium or high
level of interest of children (5-15 years old).

Futsal fans

In most of the countries Futsal fans are from 16 – 40 years old. It is possible to make a conclusion
that people play Futsal (most of them on recreational basis) are also following Futsal. Only
interesting exception are elite Futsal nations ( Spain and Portugal) have a high level of interest to
follow Futsal from seniors ( above 40 years old), even if these people are not very much interested
in playing Futsal.

Futsal and financial support

Willingness of companies to financially support Futsal is, with rare exceptions, low. It seems that a
lot more financial support is coming from public funding who is more willing to support Futsal. It
might be interesting to know that even the highest ranked European Futsal country (Spain) struggles
to get a financial support from companies or public funding.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 43/110 Borut Kukovec


Lessons to learn for undeveloped Futsal countries:

• Tradition of Futsal is playing an important role when you evaluate why Futsal has progress
more in a certain country. In the most successful countries Futsal is played at least a decade,
usually even more,
• Good way to start to promote Futsal in a country is to organize a lot of small regional
tournaments,
• In order to develop Futsal you need to assure that you have enough halls available,
• It is recommended to distinguish between the registration of Futsal and football players in
terms of a license,
• Restrictive rules on Futsal/football players might be useful when you want to increase
quality of Futsal (result - Futsal specialists)
• Having Futsal section or department (not an independent federation) that is contained within
the national football association (FA) or an independent Futsal federation integrated within
the FA are most frequently used options for the governance of Futsal,
• To assure development of Futsal in a country you need at least 1 full-time (on average 3)
and some (on average 3) part-time working staff in your Futsal governing body,
• Futsal national league is a MUST and more developed Futsal countries have 3-4 league
levels,
• Presence on regional or national TV channels is very important for development of Futsal in
a country,
• Dominant position of football and lack of financial resources are biggest challenges that
Futsal is facing in more developed Futsal countries,
• Futsal needs to be present (played) in educational institutions if country wants to develop it
to the highest level,
• Futsal is played mostly played and followed by people from 16 - 25 and 26 - 40 years old,
• General financial support for Futsal is low, in most of the countries public funding is more
interested to support Futsal than companies.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 44/110 Borut Kukovec


8. Conclusion

Main objective of this research was to assess current situation in European Futsal in order to help
UEFA with their future Futsal development strategies. A comprehensive survey that was conducted
among all the UEFA affiliated members has certainly given some important indications about the
challenges that Futsal is currently facing. Nevertheless, there were primarily many positive
findings. Findings that have confirmed that Futsal certainly has its place on the European sport
market. Furthermore, its potential for future development is enormous but the results can be only
achieved with the corporation of all Futsal stakeholders.

FIFA official version of Futsal is played in 50 UEFA affiliated members with approximately of half
a million registered players. Furthermore, there are approximately 11 million unregistered players
all over the Europe. Considering the fact that Futsal was played in only few European countries two
decades ago, these statistical findings are definitely proving that it has made a significant step
forward in terms of development. However, it is important to emphasize that there are great
differences between the countries. The biggest Futsal countries have high number of registered
players, greater financial resources, higher level of interest from the media, etc., while some others
are struggling regarding these aspects. Nevertheless, these kinds of problems are a logical
consequence of the fact that Futsal has been just introduced in some of the countries and the gap
should eventually decrease. Great boost for the future development of Futsal is the fact that some of
the leading European football nations (England, Germany) decided to intensively promote Futsal
despite having other variations of football with strong tradition present in the country.

Research has identified three main areas that should enable the growth of European Futsal in future:
media, sponsors and educational institutions. All these areas are closely related to the current
biggest obstacles for growth. First of all, lack of financial resources is present due the lack of media
interest and spectators. Therefore many of the clubs are not interested for sponsors investments.
Furthermore, here is also a problem of the management of clubs who don’t have time and/or
knowledge to attract sponsors. Dominant position of football could be challenged by starting
introducing Futsal intensively into educational institutions. Therefore, new generations of Futsal
fans/players would emerge. If there is an obstacle for future development than this is the lack of
playing halls in some of the countries because big financial investments are needed to build these
kinds of facilities. However, some of the countries have already identified ways to overcome this
problem.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 45/110 Borut Kukovec


Many of the countries have already identified the importance that Internet & New Media can have
on Futsal. This media category can certainly help Futsal to accelerate its growth because it allows
effective communication. According to the UEFA competition manager, Mr. Morel, it can also
serve as substitute to the lack of TV coverage in some of the countries because the Futsal matches
can be played over the Internet at low production costs. A lot of Futsal related web pages has
already been created and information about international competitions and many of the national
leagues are easily accessible. Countries that are not using this increasingly important media for
promotion of Futsal yet are certainly advised to take advantage of it in future.

Things that should certainly be considered in future are development of women’s and youth and
seniors Futsal. There is one big advantage that Futsal has compared to football - Futsal is not
physically exhausting as football. Smaller playing ground and unlimited number of substitutions are
making this game easier to play even for less well physically prepared players. Futsal should
definitely consider this fact and attract senior players, as it is already the case in some of the
countries. Considering the answers from national governing bodies there is also nice future ahead of
women’s Futsal, which is already organized in many of the countries while big majority of others
are planning to start it. Currently the biggest Futsal stakeholders (fans, players) are the age group of
people from 16-25 years old. That is probably one of the reasons why many of the nations will
establish national youth competitions and they are also appealing to UEFA to re-launch the U-21
Futsal European Championship.

All things considered, Futsal certainly has a bright future. Hopefully, this research will give its
contribution to development of this wonderful sport in future years. It is important that Futsal
administrators believe in progression of Futsal and perhaps, one day we will watch it on the
Olympic Games.

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 46/110 Borut Kukovec


9. References

Books

De Vaus, D. (2002), Surveys In Social Research, 5th edition, Routledge/Taylor & Francis, London.

Hylton, K. and Branham, P. (2008), Sports development: policy, process, practice, New York:
Routledge.

Mullin B.J., Hardy S. and Sutton A.W. (2007), Sport Marketing, 3rd edition, Champaign: Human
Kinetics.

Internet Sources

“DFB Futsal Cup makes successful debut”, FIFA official web page,
http://www.fifa.com/tournaments/archive/tournament=106/edition=8251/news/newsid=103785.htm
l (accessed 4/10/2009)

“FIFA Big count 2006: 270 million active in Football”, FIFA official web page,
http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/fifafacts/bcoffsurv/bigcount.statspackage_7024.pdf (accessed
15/10/2009)

“Festival of Futsal”, English FA official web page,


http://www.thefa.com/GetIntoFootball/NewsAndFeatures/2008/futsal_youth_festical.aspx#
(accessed 08/10/2009)

“Futsal World Ranking (21.09.2009)”, Fut5al world ranking web page,


http://www.futsalworldranking.be/ (accessed 02/10/2009)

“Futsal Laws of the game 2008”, FIFA official web page,


http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/fifafacts/bcoffsurv/bigcount.statspackage_7024.pdf
(accessed 10/10/2009)

“Futsal gears up in Germany”, FIFA official web page,


http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/developing/futsal/news/newsid=100891.html (accessed 4/10/2009)

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 47/110 Borut Kukovec


“New tournament begins”, UEFA official web page,
http://www.uefa.com/competitions/futsal21/news/kind=1/newsid=680692.html (accessed
8/10/2009)

“Futsal for a new generation”, UEFA official web page,


http://www.uefa.com/competitions/futsal21/news/kind=1/newsid=647466.html (accessed
29/09/2009)

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 48/110 Borut Kukovec


10. Appendices

Appendix 1: Survey Questionnaire

1. Please write-down your name, surname and the name of the Futsal country that you represent?

2. What is your position in Futsal in your country?

3. What is your occupation with Futsal in your country?

Full-time Part-time Volunteer Don't work in Futsal

4. How much of your work-time is dedicated to Futsal? (If part-time)

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

5. How many hours per week do you dedicate to Futsal? (If volunteer)

1-5 hours/week 6-10 hours/week 11-15 hours/week 16-20 hours/week


21-25 hours/week 26-30 hours/week more than 30 hours/week

6. Is the FIFA official version of Futsal played in your country?

Yes No

7. Since when has it been played as a leisure sport (without official national competitions) in your
country? (please select one answer)

Before 1960 1960-1965 1966-1970 1971-1975 1976-1980 1981-1985


1986-1990 1991-1995 1996-2000 2001-2005 After 2005 Don't know

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 49/110 Borut Kukovec


8. Since when has it been played as a competitive sport (with official national club competitions) in
your country? (please define a year)

9. Were there any particular factors that led to the development of Futsal in your country?

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 50/110 Borut Kukovec


10. Does your country distinguish between the registrations of Futsal and football players in terms
of a license?

Yes No

11. How many Futsal players are registered? (numbers only); (If answer on question 10. is No)

12. What is the estimated number of registered Futsal players in your country? (numbers only); (If
answer on question 10. is Yes)

13. How many people are approximately playing Futsal as a hobby (non-registered players) in your
country? (numbers only)

14. Is there any restrictive rule applying for a registered Futsal player to participate in domestic
football top leagues or vice versa?

Yes No

15. What kind of restrictions do they have? (example: If you are a register football player playing in
football top three divisions you are not allowed to play Futsal in first two divisions); (If answer on
question 14. is Yes)

16. In the educational institutions listed below, do youngsters play FIFA Futsal (i.e. using Futsal
ball)?

Obligatory/Primary school (6-12 years old) Yes No Don't play Futsal


Obligatory/Secondary/High school (12-18) Yes No Don't play Futsal
College/University (over 18) Yes No Don't play Futsal

17. If they don't play according to the FIFA rules, please briefly describe below which version of
indoor football is generally played (walls, normal football, etc.)?

18. If there would be a European competition for youth national teams, would your country
participate in it?

Yes No

19. In which age category would you participate with your national team? (please select one
answer)

U-17 U-19 U21

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 51/110 Borut Kukovec


20. Is women's Futsal organized in your country?

Yes No
21. Is women's Futsal managed on a national or/and regional level?

Yes No

22. Are there any future plans to start women's Futsal?

Yes No

23. How is Futsal governed on a national level? (please select one answer)

A Futsal section or department ( not an independent federation) that is contained within the
national football association (FA)

An independent Futsal federation integrated within the FA

An independent Futsal federation that is outside of the FA, but with a contractual agreement
between the two bodies

Futsal is played at a lower level (local or regional), but there is contact with the FA

An independent Futsal federation that has only minor connections with the main FA

24. If Futsal is governed outside the football association (FA), does a Futsal representative holds a
position within FA (member of the board, commission, etc.)?

Yes No

25. What kind of position does he holds? (If answer on question 24. is Yes)

26. How many members of the staff does your Futsal governing body employs for Futsal
administration (within or outside the FA)?

Full-time Part-time

27. Do you have a national Futsal league?

Yes No

28. Do you plan to launch a national Futsal league? (If answer on question 27. is Yes)

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 52/110 Borut Kukovec


Yes No

29. When will domestic league be launched? (please select one answer) (If answer on question 28.
is Yes)

in 2010 in 2-3 years in 4-5 years in more than 5 years

30. In which year has the league been established? (please define a year)

31. How many league levels do you have?

1 2 3 4 5 6 or more

32. How many clubs does compete in each of the league levels?

First division 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 21-30 more than 30


Second division 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 21-30 more than 30
Third division 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 21-30 more than 30
Fourth division 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 21-30 more than 30
Fifth division 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 21-30 more than 30
Sixth division 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 21-30 more than 30

33. Are all league levels played indoors?

Yes No

34. Which league levels are played outdoors? (If answer on question 33. is No)

35. What was the average season attendance in top division league matches last season? (numbers
only)

36. What was the highest attendance in a top division league match last season? (numbers only)

37. What is the estimated average budget of a top division club? (please select one answer)

less than 10,000 EUR


10,000 - 50,000 EUR
50,000 - 100,000 EUR
100,000 - 500,000 EUR
500,000 EUR or more

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 53/110 Borut Kukovec


38. What is approximate budget of the wealthiest top division club? (please answer in EUR -
numbers only)

39. Are Futsal league matches shown on TV?

Yes No

40. Are matches shown on regional TV channel(s)? (If answer on question 39. is Yes)

Yes No

41. If possible please define (for each regional TV channel) broadcaster(s) potential audience,
accumulated number of viewers, average and the highest number of viewers per match?

42. How often are league matches shown on regional TV channel?

1-10 hours/season 11-30 hours/season 31-50 hours/season 51-100 hours/season


more than 100 hours/season

43. What kind of TV coverage do Futsal matches get on regional TV channel? (it is possible to
select more answers)

Live
Replay
Only highlights

44. Are matches shown on national TV channel(s)? (If answer on question 39. is Yes)

Yes No

45. If possible please define (for each national TV channel) broadcaster(s) potential audience,
accumulated number of viewers, average and the highest number of viewers per match?

46. How often are league matches shown on national TV channel?

1-10 hours/season 11-30 hours/season 31-50 hours/season 51-100 hours/season


more than 100 hours/season

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 54/110 Borut Kukovec


47. What kind of coverage do Futsal matches get on national TV channel? (it is possible to select
more answers)

Live
Replay
Only highlights

48. Please evaluate importance of different media categories for the national Futsal league?
(evaluate them from 1-4: 1 - not important, 2 - somewhat important, 3 - important, 4 - very
important)

TV
Radio
Written press (newspaper, magazine, etc,)
Internet and new media

49. What was the evolution of the media coverage of Futsal in your country during the last 5 years?
(please select the most suitable answer)

No general interest Decreased interest Interest remained unchanged


Slow growing interest Average growing interest Substantial growing interest

50. Please identify the most influential factors that are preventing Futsal to grow (even) more in
your country. Rate each of the them according to the importance from 1-4 (1 - not important, 2 -
somewhat important, 3 - important, 4 - very important).

Competition from other indoor sports


Hall availability
Lack of financial resources
Lack of support from the football governing body
Lack of professional management of the clubs
Lack of Futsal tradition
Limited interest from the media
Dominant postion of football

51. What is the level of interest to PLAY Futsal among different age groups?
(1 - no interest, 2 - low, 3 - medium, 4 - high)

Children (5-15) Youth (16-25) Adult ( 26-40) Senior (above 40)

52. What is the level of interest to WATCH and FOLLOW Futsal among different age groups?
(1-no interest, 2-low, 3-medium, 4-high)

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 55/110 Borut Kukovec


Children (5-15) Youth (16-25) Adult ( 26-40) Senior (above 40)

53. What is the level of interest of sponsors to SUPPORT Futsal? (1-no interest, 2-low, 3-medium,
4-high)

Companies
Public funding (municipalities, regional, state)

54. What is the level of interest of educational institutions to SUPPORT Futsal? (1-no interest, 2-
low, 3-medium, 4-high)

Primary schools Secondary/High schools Colleges/Universities

55. Please give us a brief comment on the Futsal perspective in your country for the forthcoming 5
years and how do you intend to promote the sport?

56. What are the main reasons that your association did not started with Futsal yet. Please rate each
of them from 1-4 (1 - not important, 2 - somewhat important, 3 - important, 4 - very important).

There is another version of indoor football played


Lack of players
Lack of playing grounds (indoor and outdoor)
Lack of knowledge of Futsal rules
Lack of financial resources

57. Do you foresee any kind of development of Futsal in your country in future years?

58. Do you plan to launch a domestic Futsal league?

Yes No

59. When will domestic league be launched? (please select one answer); (If answer on question 58.
is Yes)

in 2010 in 2-3 years in 4-5 years in more than 5 years

60. Do you plan to create a national Futsal team?

Yes No

61. When will the national team be created?

in 2010 in 2-3 years in 4-5 years in more than 5 years

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 56/110 Borut Kukovec


62. Do you have any request, comment or suggestion with regards to Futsal or this survey in
particular?

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 57/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 2: Respondents profile

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Full-time 49,1 % 26
2 Part-time 22,6 % 12
3 Volunteer 18,9 % 10
4 Don't work in Futsal 9,4 % 5
Total 53

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 58/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 3: FIFA Futsal version

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 94,3 % 50
2 No 5,7 % 3
Total 53

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 59/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 4: Leisure Futsal emergence

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Before 1960 6,0 % 3
2 1960-1965 6,0 % 3
3 1966-1970 10,0 % 5
4 1971-1975 2,0 % 1
5 1976-1980 4,0 % 2
6 1981-1985 8,0 % 4
7 1986-1990 8,0 % 4
8 1991-1995 16,0 % 8
9 1996-2000 12,0 % 6
10 2001-2005 18,0 % 9
11 After 2005 10,0 % 5
12 Don't know 0,0 % 0
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 60/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 5: Competitive Futsal emergence

Alternatives Percent Value


1 before 1960 2,0 % 1
2 1961 0,0 % 0
3 1962 0,0 % 0
4 1963 0,0 % 0
5 1964 0,0 % 0
6 1965 0,0 % 0
7 1966 0,0 % 0
8 1967 0,0 % 0
9 1968 0,0 % 0
10 1969 0,0 % 0
11 1970 0,0 % 0
12 1971 0,0 % 0
13 1972 0,0 % 0
14 1973 0,0 % 0
15 1974 0,0 % 0
16 1975 0,0 % 0
17 1976 0,0 % 0
18 1977 0,0 % 0
19 1978 0,0 % 0
20 1979 0,0 % 0
21 1980 4,0 % 2
22 1981 0,0 % 0
23 1982 0,0 % 0
24 1983 2,0 % 1
25 1984 2,0 % 1
26 1985 2,0 % 1
27 1986 2,0 % 1
28 1987 0,0 % 0

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 61/110 Borut Kukovec


29 1988 0,0 % 0
30 1989 0,0 % 0
31 1990 4,0 % 2
32 1991 4,0 % 2
33 1992 2,0 % 1
34 1993 6,0 % 3
35 1994 4,0 % 2
36 1995 6,0 % 3
37 1996 2,0 % 1
38 1997 10,0 % 5
39 1998 2,0 % 1
40 1999 4,0 % 2
41 2000 4,0 % 2
42 2001 2,0 % 1
43 2002 2,0 % 1
44 2003 4,0 % 2
45 2004 0,0 % 0
46 2005 4,0 % 2
47 2006 12,0 % 6
48 2007 6,0 % 3
49 2008 2,0 % 1
50 2009 6,0 % 3
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 62/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 6: Futsal/football players license differentiation

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 70,0 % 35
2 No 30,0 % 15
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 63/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 7: Restrictive rules for Futsal/football players

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 50,0 % 25
2 No 50,0 % 25
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 64/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 8: Youth competitions interest

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 64,0 % 32
2 No 6,0 % 3
3 Don't know 30,0 % 15
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 U-17 9,4 % 3
2 U-19 6,3 % 2
3 U-21 84,4 % 27
Total 32

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 65/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 9: Women’s Futsal

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 40,0 % 20
2 No 60,0 % 30
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 85,0 % 17
2 No 15,0 % 3
Total 20

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 66/110 Borut Kukovec


Alternatives Percent Value
1 Yes 63,3 % 19
2 No 36,7 % 11
Total 30

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 67/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 10: National governance of Futsal

Alternatives Percent Value


1 A Futsal section or department ( not an 66,0 % 33
independent federation) that is contained within
the national football association (FA)
2 An independent Futsal federation integrated 20,0 % 10
within the FA
3 An independent Futsal federation that is 0,0 % 0
outside of the FA, but with a contractual
agreement between the two bodies
4 Futsal is played at a lower level (local or 6,0 % 3
regional), but there is contact with the FA
5 An independent Futsal federation that has only 2,0 % 1
minor connections with the main FA
6 Other, please specify 6,0 % 3
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 40,0 % 2
2 No 60,0 % 3
Total 5

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 68/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 11: Governing body administration (full-time, part-time)

26.1 How many members of the staff does your Futsal governing body employs for Futsal administration (within or
outside the FA)? - Full-time

Alternatives Percent Value


1 0 26,0 % 13
2 1 32,0 % 16
3 2 18,0 % 9
4 3 14,0 % 7
5 4 0,0 % 0
6 5 0,0 % 0
7 6 or more 10,0 % 5
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 69/110 Borut Kukovec


26.2 How many members of the staff does your Futsal governing body employs for Futsal administration (within or
outside the FA)? - Part-time

Alternatives Percent Value


1 0 30,0 % 15
2 1 14,0 % 7
3 2 10,0 % 5
4 3 16,0 % 8
5 4 10,0 % 5
6 5 0,0 % 0
7 6 or more 20,0 % 10
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 70/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 12: National Futsal league establishment

Alternatives Percent Value


1 before 1960 2,3 % 1
2 1961 0,0 % 0
3 1962 0,0 % 0
4 1963 0,0 % 0
5 1964 0,0 % 0
6 1965 0,0 % 0
7 1966 0,0 % 0
8 1967 0,0 % 0
9 1968 0,0 % 0
10 1969 0,0 % 0
11 1970 0,0 % 0
12 1971 0,0 % 0
13 1972 0,0 % 0
14 1973 0,0 % 0
15 1974 0,0 % 0
16 1975 0,0 % 0
17 1976 0,0 % 0
18 1977 0,0 % 0
19 1978 0,0 % 0
20 1979 0,0 % 0
21 1980 2,3 % 1
22 1981 0,0 % 0
23 1982 0,0 % 0
24 1983 2,3 % 1
25 1984 0,0 % 0
26 1985 0,0 % 0
27 1986 0,0 % 0
28 1987 0,0 % 0

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 71/110 Borut Kukovec


29 1988 0,0 % 0
30 1989 0,0 % 0
31 1990 2,3 % 1
32 1991 9,1 % 4
33 1992 4,5 % 2
34 1993 4,5 % 2
35 1994 6,8 % 3
36 1995 2,3 % 1
37 1996 0,0 % 0
38 1997 15,9 % 7
39 1998 2,3 % 1
40 1999 6,8 % 3
41 2000 2,3 % 1
42 2001 4,5 % 2
43 2002 4,5 % 2
44 2003 2,3 % 1
45 2004 0,0 % 0
46 2005 4,5 % 2
47 2006 4,5 % 2
48 2007 4,5 % 2
49 2008 6,8 % 3
50 2009 4,5 % 2
Total 44

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 72/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 13: Number of national league levels

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1 22,7 % 10
2 2 31,8 % 14
3 3 25,0 % 11
4 4 15,9 % 7
5 5 0,0 % 0
6 6 or more 4,5 % 2
Total 44

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 73/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 14: Number of clubs per division

32.1 How many clubs does compete in each of the league levels?

Alternatives Percent Value


1 4 4,5 % 2
2 6 4,5 % 2
3 8 18,2 % 8
4 10 15,9 % 7
5 12 27,3 % 12
6 14 11,4 % 5
7 16 11,4 % 5
8 18 0,0 % 0
9 20 0,0 % 0
10 21-30 4,5 % 2
11 more than 30 2,3 % 1
Total 44

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 74/110 Borut Kukovec


32.2 How many clubs does compete in each of the league levels? - Second division

Alternatives Percent Value


1 4 0,0 % 0
2 6 5,9 % 2
3 8 11,8 % 4
4 10 8,8 % 3
5 12 11,8 % 4
6 14 5,9 % 2
7 16 11,8 % 4
8 18 5,9 % 2
9 20 5,9 % 2
10 21-30 14,7 % 5
11 more than 30 17,6 % 6
Total 34

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 75/110 Borut Kukovec


32.3 How many clubs does compete in each of the league levels? - Third division

Alternatives Percent Value


1 4 0,0 % 0
2 6 4,8 % 1
3 8 0,0 % 0
4 10 4,8 % 1
5 12 14,3 % 3
6 14 9,5 % 2
7 16 4,8 % 1
8 18 0,0 % 0
9 20 4,8 % 1
10 21-30 9,5 % 2
11 more than 30 47,6 % 10
Total 21

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 76/110 Borut Kukovec


32.4 How many clubs does compete in each of the league levels? - Fourth division

Alternatives Percent Value


1 4 0,0 % 0
2 6 0,0 % 0
3 8 11,1 % 1
4 10 0,0 % 0
5 12 22,2 % 2
6 14 0,0 % 0
7 16 11,1 % 1
8 18 0,0 % 0
9 20 0,0 % 0
10 21-30 0,0 % 0
11 more than 30 55,6 % 5
Total 9

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 77/110 Borut Kukovec


32.5 How many clubs does compete in each of the league levels? - Fifth division

Alternatives Percent Value


1 4 0,0 % 0
2 6 0,0 % 0
3 8 0,0 % 0
4 10 0,0 % 0
5 12 50,0 % 1
6 14 0,0 % 0
7 16 0,0 % 0
8 18 0,0 % 0
9 20 0,0 % 0
10 21-30 0,0 % 0
11 more than 30 50,0 % 1
Total 2

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 78/110 Borut Kukovec


32.6 How many clubs does compete in each of the league levels? - Sixth division

Alternatives Percent Value


1 4 0,0 % 0
2 6 0,0 % 0
3 8 0,0 % 0
4 10 0,0 % 0
5 12 50,0 % 1
6 14 0,0 % 0
7 16 0,0 % 0
8 18 0,0 % 0
9 20 0,0 % 0
10 21-30 0,0 % 0
11 more than 30 50,0 % 1
Total 2

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 79/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 15: League levels – indoors or outdoors

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 84,1 % 37
2 No 15,9 % 7
Total 44

Alternatives Percent Value


1 First division 42,9 % 3
2 Second division 42,9 % 3
3 Third division 14,3 % 1
4 Fourth division 14,3 % 1
5 Fifth division 14,3 % 1
6 Sixth division 14,3 % 1
Total 7

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 80/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 16: Average budget of a top division club

Alternatives Percent Value


1 less than 10,000 EUR 41,9 % 18
2 10,000 - 50,000 EUR 30,2 % 13
3 50,000 - 100,000 EUR 14,0 % 6
4 100,000 - 500,000 EUR 7,0 % 3
5 500,000 EUR or more 7,0 % 3
Total 43

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 81/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 17: Regional TV coverage (number of hours/season, form of coverage)

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 65,2 % 15
2 No 34,8 % 8
Total 23

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1-10 hours/season 35,7 % 5
2 11-30 hours/season 21,4 % 3
3 31-50 hours/season 21,4 % 3
4 51-100 hours/season 7,1 % 1
5 more than 100 hours/season 14,3 % 2
Total 14

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 82/110 Borut Kukovec


Alternatives Percent Value
1 Live 46,7 % 7
2 Replay 53,3 % 8
3 Only highlights 53,3 % 8
4 Other, please specify 6,7 % 1
Total 15

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 83/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 18: National TV coverage (number of hours/season, form of coverage)

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 69,6 % 16
2 No 30,4 % 7
Total 23

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1-10 hours/season 33,3 % 5
2 11-30 hours/season 26,7 % 4
3 31-50 hours/season 20,0 % 3
4 51-100 hours/season 13,3 % 2
5 more than 100 hours/season 6,7 % 1
Total 15

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 84/110 Borut Kukovec


Alternatives Percent Value
1 Live 62,5 % 10
2 Replay 62,5 % 10
3 Only highlights 37,5 % 6
4 Other, please specify 18,8 % 3
Total 16

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 85/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 19: National Futsal league & Media categories

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1 20,5 % 9
2 2 20,5 % 9
3 3 11,4 % 5
4 4 47,7 % 21
Total 44

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1 34,1 % 15
2 2 25,0 % 11
3 3 29,5 % 13
4 4 11,4 % 5
Total 44

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 86/110 Borut Kukovec


Alternatives Percent Value
1 1 6,8 % 3
2 2 15,9 % 7
3 3 38,6 % 17
4 4 38,6 % 17
Total 44

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1 11,4 % 5
2 2 11,4 % 5
3 3 25,0 % 11
4 4 52,3 % 23
Total 44

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 87/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 20: Evolution of the media coverage in the last 5 years

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No general interest 24,0 % 12
2 Decreased interest 4,0 % 2
3 Interest remained unchanged 4,0 % 2
4 Slow growing interest 28,0 % 14
5 Average growing interest 34,0 % 17
6 Substantial growing interest 6,0 % 3
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 88/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 21: European Futsal growth obstacles

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1 16,0 % 8
2 2 32,0 % 16
3 3 36,0 % 18
4 4 16,0 % 8
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1 4,0 % 2
2 2 26,0 % 13
3 3 32,0 % 16
4 4 38,0 % 19
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 89/110 Borut Kukovec


Alternatives Percent Value
1 1 2,0 % 1
2 2 8,0 % 4
3 3 42,0 % 21
4 4 48,0 % 24
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1 24,0 % 12
2 2 32,0 % 16
3 3 28,0 % 14
4 4 16,0 % 8
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 90/110 Borut Kukovec


Alternatives Percent Value
1 1 6,0 % 3
2 2 28,0 % 14
3 3 38,0 % 19
4 4 28,0 % 14
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1 32,0 % 16
2 2 24,0 % 12
3 3 24,0 % 12
4 4 20,0 % 10
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 91/110 Borut Kukovec


Alternatives Percent Value
1 1 4,0 % 2
2 2 30,0 % 15
3 3 34,0 % 17
4 4 32,0 % 16
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 1 4,0 % 2
2 2 8,0 % 4
3 3 42,0 % 21
4 4 46,0 % 23
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 92/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 22: Level of interest to play Futsal – different age groups

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 12,0 % 6
2 Low 36,0 % 18
3 Medium 26,0 % 13
4 High 26,0 % 13
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 0,0 % 0
2 Low 14,0 % 7
3 Medium 48,0 % 24
4 High 38,0 % 19
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 93/110 Borut Kukovec


Alternatives Percent Value
1 No interest 4,0 % 2
2 Low 10,0 % 5
3 Medium 42,0 % 21
4 High 44,0 % 22
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 12,0 % 6
2 Low 36,0 % 18
3 Medium 26,0 % 13
4 High 26,0 % 13
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 94/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 23: Level of interest to watch and follow Futsal among different age groups

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 16,0 % 8
2 Low 46,0 % 23
3 Medium 26,0 % 13
4 High 12,0 % 6
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 6,0 % 3
2 Low 26,0 % 13
3 Medium 42,0 % 21
4 High 26,0 % 13
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 95/110 Borut Kukovec


Alternatives Percent Value
1 No interest 4,0 % 2
2 Low 16,0 % 8
3 Medium 48,0 % 24
4 High 32,0 % 16
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 12,0 % 6
2 Low 34,0 % 17
3 Medium 42,0 % 21
4 High 12,0 % 6
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 96/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 24: Level of interest to support Futsal – companies and public entities

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 10,0 % 5
2 Low 62,0 % 31
3 Medium 26,0 % 13
4 High 2,0 % 1
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 18,0 % 9
2 Low 50,0 % 25
3 Medium 28,0 % 14
4 High 4,0 % 2
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 97/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 25: Do youngsters play Futsal in educational institutions?

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 32,0 % 16
2 No 42,0 % 21
3 Don't play Futsal 26,0 % 13
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 Yes 48,0 % 24
2 No 38,0 % 19
3 Don't play Futsal 14,0 % 7
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 98/110 Borut Kukovec


Alternatives Percent Value
1 Yes 64,0 % 32
2 No 28,0 % 14
3 Don't play Futsal 8,0 % 4
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 99/110 Borut Kukovec


Appendix 26: Level of interest of educational institutions to support Futsal

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 30,0 % 15
2 Low 34,0 % 17
3 Medium 30,0 % 15
4 High 6,0 % 3
Total 50

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 18,0 % 9
2 Low 32,0 % 16
3 Medium 38,0 % 19
4 High 12,0 % 6
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 100/110 Borut Kukovec


54.3 What is the level of interest of educational institutions to SUPPORT Futsal? - Colleges/Universities

Alternatives Percent Value


1 No interest 14,0 % 7
2 Low 36,0 % 18
3 Medium 36,0 % 18
4 High 14,0 % 7
Total 50

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 101/110 Borut Kukovec


MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 102/110 Borut Kukovec
Appendix 27: European Futsal KPI table
National 
All  Highest 
governing body 
Differentiation  Youth  Number  league  Average  attendance in 
Futsal/Football  Number of  European  of  levels  attendance in  top division 
FIFA Futsal  players ‐  Registered  competition  Women's  Full‐ Part‐ National futsal  league  played  top division  matches 
COUNTRY  version  license  players  participation  futsal  time  time  league  levels  indoors  matches 08/09  08/09 
Albania  Yes  Yes  240  Yes  No  2  1  Yes  1  No  n/a  2.500 
Andorra  Yes  Yes  1.296  Don't know  No  2  3  Yes  2  Yes  75  350 
Armenia  Yes  Yes  272  Yes  Yes  1  6+  Yes  2  Yes  500  2.000 
Austria  Yes  Yes  914  Don't know  Yes  0  0  Yes  2  Yes  50  100 
Azerbaijan  Yes  Yes  500  Yes  No  0  4  Yes  2  Yes  200  1.500 
Belgium  Yes  Yes  16.526  Yes  No  6 +  2  Yes  3  Yes  800  1.000 
Bosnia‐Herzegovina Yes  No  2.000  Don't know  No  1  0  Yes  2  Yes  500  10.000 
Belarus  Yes  No  3.800  Yes  No  3  3  Yes  3  Yes  300  1.500 
Bulgaria  Yes  Yes  300  Yes  No  1  4  Yes  2  Yes  50  1.500 
Croatia  Yes  Yes  2.105  Yes  No  0  1  Yes  3  Yes  350  2.000 
Cyprus  Yes  Yes  1.000  Yes  No  1  0  Yes  3  No  300  2.000 
Czech Republic  Yes  Yes  45.000  Yes  Yes  3  3  Yes  6  No  700  2.500 
Denmark  Yes  No  n/a  No  Yes  0  1  Yes  1  Yes  n/a  n/a 
England  Yes  No  1.000  Don't know  Yes  2  0  Yes  1  Yes  20  500 
Estonia  Yes  No  400  Don't know  No  0  3  Yes  2  Yes  50  150 
Faroe Islands  No                                  
Finland  Yes  No  20.000  Yes  Yes  1  1  Yes  2  Yes  110  250 
France  Yes  Yes  14.000  Yes  No  2  3  Yes  1  Yes  300  500 
Georgia  Yes  Yes  100  Yes  No  3  4  Yes  1  Yes  n/a  200 
Germany  Yes  Yes  5.000  Don't know  No  1  0  No             
Greece  Yes  Yes  2.521  Yes  No  2  6+  Yes  2  No  80  300 
Hungary  Yes  Yes  1.200  Yes  Yes  6+  0  Yes  2  Yes  200  800 
Republic of Ireland  Yes  Yes  300  Yes  No  1  0  Yes  1  Yes  100  400 
Interest to PLAY
 

Highest  Children 
Average  budget of a  TV  Regional 
budget of a  top  coverage  TV  National TV 
top division  division  of league  coverage/  Form of  coverage/ 
COUNTRY  club (EUR)  club (EUR)  matches  season  coverage  season  Form of coverage  Youth   Adult   Senior 
Albania  less than 10K   5.000  Yes  1‐10 hours  Replay  1‐10 hours  Replay  No interest High  Medium  High 
Andorra  less than 10K   20.000  No              High   Medium Medium  Low 
Armenia  10‐50K  100.000  Yes  11‐30 hours Live, replay  11‐30 hours  Live, repl.  Medium  High  High  High 
Austria  less than 10K   20.000  No              Low  Medium High  Low 
Azerbaijan  less than 10K   n/a  Yes  31‐50 hours Live  31‐50 hours  Live  No interest High  No interest  High 
Belgium  n/a  n/a  Yes  n/a  Highlights, replay n/a  Highlights  Medium  Medium Medium  Medium 
Bosnia‐Herzegovina less than 10K   15.000  No              Low  Medium High  High 
Belarus  10‐50K   150.000  Yes  1‐10 hours  Highlights, replay 1‐10 hours  Highlights,repl.  Medium   High  High   Medium 
Bulgaria  10‐50K   40.000  No              No interest Low  Medium  Low 
Croatia  50‐100K  250.000  Yes  11‐30 hours Highlights        Low  Medium High  Medium 
Cyprus  100‐500K  120.000  Yes              Low  High  High  Medium 
Czech Republic  50‐100K  300.000  Yes  100 + hours Highlights, replay 31‐50 hours  Live, replay, highlights Low  High  High  Medium 
Denmark  less than 10K   n/a  No              Medium  Medium No interest  No interest 
England  less than 10K   5.000  No              Medium  Medium Low  No interest 
Estonia  less than 10K   8.000  No              Low  Low  Medium  Low 
Faroe Islands                                  
Finland  10‐50K  60.000  No              Medium  High  Medium  Medium 
France  10‐50K  50.000  No              Low  High  Medium  No interest 
Georgia  less than 10K   n/a  No              Low  High  High  No interest 
Germany                       Medium  High  Medium  Low 
Greece  10‐50K  70.000  Yes        11‐30 hours  Live, replay  High  Medium Medium  Low 
Hungary  10‐50K  200.000  Yes  31‐50 hours Highlights        Medium  Medium Medium  Medium 
Republic of Ireland  less than 10K   n/a  No              High  Low  Medium  Low 

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 104/110 Borut Kukovec


Interest to FOLLOW Interest to SUPPORT 
   from sponsors  
Futsal in educational  Interest to SUPPORT ‐
institutions  educational institutions 

Obligator Obligatory/ Youth   Companies 


y/primary  Secondar Colleges/ Primary  Secondary/
schools  y/high  Universiti schools  high  Colleges/Uni Public 
COUNTRY  schools  es  schools  versities  Children  Adult   Senior  Funding 
Albania  Yes  Yes  Yes  High  High  High  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium 
Andorra  Don't play Don't play  Don't play No interest  No interest  No interest  Low  Low  Medium  Medium  Low  Medium 
Armenia  Yes  Yes  Yes  Medium  Medium  Medium  Low  Medium  Medium  High  Low  Low 
Austria  Yes  Yes  Yes  Low  Medium  Low  Low  Low  Medium  Medium  Low  Medium 
Azerbaijan  Don't play Yes  Yes  No interest  Low  Low  No interest  High  High  High  Low  Low 
Belgium  Don't play Don't play  Don't play Low  Low  Low  Low  Medium  Medium  Medium  Low  Low 
Bosnia‐Herz.  No  Yes  Yes  Low  Low  Low  No interest  No interest  Low  Low  No interest  No interest 
Belarus  No  No  Yes  Low   Low   High  Medium  High  High  Medium  Low  Medium 
Bulgaria  No  No  No  No interest  No interest  No interest  Low  Medium  Medium  Low  Low  No interest 
Croatia  No  No  No  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  Medium  Medium  Medium  Low 
Cyprus  Don't play Don't play  Yes  No interest  No interest  Medium  Low  Medium  High  Medium  Medium  Low 
Czech Republic  Yes  Yes  Yes  Medium  High  Medium  Low  Low  High  Low  Medium  Medium 
Denmark  No  No  No  Low  No interest  No interest  Medium  Medium  No interest  No interest Low  Low 
England  Yes  Yes  Yes  Medium  High  Medium  Low  Medium  Low  No interest Medium  Medium 
Estonia  Don't play Don't play  Don't play No interest  No interest  No interest  No interest  Low  Low  Low  Low  No interest 
Faroe Islands                                     
Finland  Yes  Yes  Yes  Low  Medium  Medium  Low  High  Medium  Low  Low  Low 
France  No  Yes  Yes  No interest  Medium  Medium  No interest  Medium  Medium  No interest Medium  Medium 
Georgia  Yes  Yes  Yes  Low  Low  Low  Low  High  High  No interest Low  Low 
Germany  Yes  Yes  Yes  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Low  Low 
Greece  No  No  Yes  No interest  No interest  Low  Medium  High  Medium  Medium  No interest  No interest 
Hungary  Yes  Yes  Yes  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Low  Low 
Republic of 
Ireland  Yes  Yes  Yes  Medium  Medium  Medium  Low  Low  Low  Low  Medium  Medium 

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 105/110 Borut Kukovec


National governing 
body employes 

Differentiation  Youth  Women's  All league  Average  Highest 


Futsal/Football  Number of  European  futsal  National  Number  levels  attendance in  attendance in 
FIFA Futsal  players ‐  Registered  competition  Full‐ Part‐ futsal  of league  played  top division  top division 
COUNTRY  version  license  players  participation  time  time  league  levels  indoors  matches 08/09 matches 08/09 
Iceland  Yes  No  n/a  Don't know  Yes  0  1  Yes  1  Yes  n/a  n/a 
Israel  Yes  Yes  250  Yes  No  1  4  Yes  1  Yes  150‐200  850 
Italy  Yes  No  70.000  Yes  Yes  6+  6+  Yes  6  No  1.500  3.000 
Kazakhstan  Yes  Yes  200  Yes  No  2  1  Yes  3  Yes  n/a  n/a 
Liechtenstein  No                                  
Lithuania  Yes  No  750  Don't know  No  3  0  Yes  3  Yes  350  1.100 
Luxemburg  No                                  
Latvia  Yes  Yes  2.000  Don't know  No  1  3  Yes  4  Yes  75  500 
Moldova  Yes  Yes  969  Yes  Yes  3  2  Yes  4  Yes  250  1.500 
FYR Macedonia  Yes  Yes  562  Yes  No  1  3  Yes  1  Yes  500  3.500 
Malta  Yes  No  1.000  No  No  1  2  Yes  4  No  100  400 
Montenegro  Yes  No  120  Don't know  No  1  2  Yes  2  No  100  1500 
Netherlands  Yes  Yes  65.000  Yes  Yes  3  2  Yes  4  Yes  300  1500 
Northern Ireland  Yes  No  n/a  Don't know  No  0  1  No             
Norway  Yes  Yes  1.100  No  Yes  0  6+  Yes  3  Yes  50  400 
Poland  Yes  Yes  3.500  Yes  Yes  1  0  Yes  4  Yes  800  1.400 
Portugal  Yes  Yes  30.000  Yes  Yes  1  /  Yes  3  Yes  300  3000 
Romania  Yes  Yes  400  Yes  No  2  0  Yes  2  Yes  2008  3000 
Russia  Yes  No  10.774  Yes  Yes  6 +  6+  Yes  4  Yes  2000‐3000  4700 
Scotland  Yes  No  400  Don't know  No  0  0  Yes  3  Yes  0  0 
San Marino  Yes  Yes  206  Don't know  No  0  0  No             
Serbia  Yes  Yes  1.479  Yes  No  1  6+  Yes  3  Yes  800‐1000  2000 
Spain  Yes  Yes  110.099  Yes  Yes  6 +  /  Yes  4  Yes  2.500  6.500 
Switzerland  Yes  Yes  1.200  Yes  No  0  3  Yes  3  Yes  200  1.200 
Slovakia  Yes  Yes  16.000  Yes  No  1  6+  Yes  2  Yes  400  1500 
Slovenia  Yes  Yes  2.000  Yes  Yes  2  6+  Yes  3  Yes  500  1500 
Sweden  Yes  Yes  87.500  Don't know  Yes  0  4  No             
Turkey  Yes  Yes  1.280  Yes  Yes  2  6+  Yes  1  Yes  125  1.000 
Ukraine  Yes  Yes  820  Yes  Yes  3  6+  Yes             

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 106/110 Borut Kukovec


Interest to PLAY
 

Wales  Yes  No  100  Don't know  No  0  0  No             


Average  Highest  TV  Children 
budget of a  budget of a  coverage  Regional TV  National TV 
top division  top division  of league  coverage/  Form of  coverage/  Form of 
COUNTRY  club (EUR)  club (EUR)  matches  season  coverage  season  coverage  Youth   Adult   Senior 
Iceland  less than 10K   n/a  No              High  Medium  Low  Low 
Israel  10‐50K  70.000  Yes              High  Medium  High  High 
Italy  500K +  1.200.000  Yes  100 + hours  Live, replay  100 + hours  Live, replay  Medium  Medium  High  Medium 
Kazakhstan  500K +  2.000.000  Yes        1‐10 hours  Replay, H.  No interest  Low  Medium  High 
Liechtenstein                                  
Lithuania  10‐50K  n/a  No              High  Medium  High  High 
Luxemburg                                  
Latvia  less than 10K   n/a  No              Low  Medium  High  Medium 
Moldova  10‐50K  70.000  No              Low  High  High  Medium 
FYR Macedonia  10‐50K  30.000  Yes  11‐30 hours  Live, R., H.  11‐30 hours  Live, R., H.  High  Medium  Medium  High 
Malta  less than 10K   n/a  No              Low   Low  High  High 
Montenegro  less than 10K   15.000  Yes              High  Medium  Medium  Low 
Netherlands  50‐100K  100.000  No              High   High  Medium  Low 
Northern Ireland                       Medium  Medium  Low  No interest 
Norway  less than 10K   20.000  Yes  1‐10 hours  Live        Low  Medium  High  Low 
Poland  10‐50K  100.000  No              Low  High  High  High 
Portugal  50‐100K  800.000  Yes              High   High  High  Medium 
Romania  100‐500K   250.000  Yes  51‐100 hours  Live, H.  51‐100 hours  Live, highlights  Low  High  High  Medium 
Russia  500K +  8.000.000  Yes  31‐50 hours  Live, Replay 51‐100 hours   Live, replay  High   High  Medium  Low 
Scotland  less than 10K   0  No              Low  Medium  Medium  Low 
San Marino                       No interest  Low  Medium  High 
Serbia  less than 10K   50.000  No              High   Medium  Medium  Low 
Spain  100‐500K  2.000.000  Yes  1 – 10 hours  Live, H.  31‐50 hours  Live, highlights  Medium  Medium  Medium  Low 
Switzerland  less than 10K   30.000  No              Low  Medium  Medium  Low 
Slovakia  10‐50K  70.000  Yes  1‐10 hours  Highlights  11‐30 hours  Live, replay  Low  High  High  High 
Slovenia  50‐100K  250.000  No              Medium  High  High  High 
Sweden                       High  Medium  Low  No interest 
Turkey  less than 10K   5.000  Yes        1‐10 hours  Live  Low  High  High  Low 
Ukraine                       Medium  Medium  High  Medium 

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 107/110 Borut Kukovec


Interest to FOLLOW Interest to SUPPORT 
   from sponsors  
Futsal in educational  Interest to SUPPORT ‐
institutions  educational institutions 
Wales                       No interest  Low  Low  Low 
Obligator Obligatory/ Youth   Companies 
y/primary  Secondar Colleges/ Primary  Secondary/
schools  y/high  Universiti schools  high  Colleges/Uni Public 
COUNTRY  schools  es  schools  versities  Children  Adult   Senior  Funding 
Iceland  No  No  No  Low  Medium  Medium  Low  Low  Low  Low  No interest  Low 
Israel  No  No  Yes  Medium  Medium  High  Medium  Low  High  High  Medium  High 
Italy  No  No  No  Low  Low  Low  Medium  Medium  High  Medium  Medium  Low 
Kazakhstan  Don't play  No  Yes  No interest  Low  Medium  High  High  High  High  Low  No interest 
Liechtenstein                                     
Lithuania  Yes  Yes  Yes  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Low  Low 
Luxemburg                                     
Latvia  No  No  No  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  High  Medium  Low  Low 
Moldova  Don't play No  Yes  No interest  Low  Medium  Low  High  Medium  Low  Low  Low 
FYR Macedonia  No  No  No  High  High  Low  High  Medium  Medium  Medium  Low  Low 
Malta  No  No  No  Medium  Medium  Low  No interest  No interest  Medium  Medium  Low  Low 
Montenegro  Don't play Yes  Yes  Medium  Medium  Medium  High  Medium  Medium  Medium  Low  Low 
Netherlands  No  No  No  High  High  Low  High  High  Medium  Low  Low  Low 
Northern Ireland  Don't play Don't play  Yes  No interest  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  No interest No interest  No interest 
Norway  No  No  No  No interest  No interest  No interest  No interest  Medium  Medium  Low  Low  No interest 
Poland  Don't play No  Yes  No interest  Medium  High  Medium  Low  High  Medium  High  Low 
Portugal  Yes  Yes  Yes  Medium  Medium  Medium  High  High  High  High  Medium  Low 
Romania  No  No  No  No interest  Medium  Low  Low  Medium  High  Medium  Low  Medium 
Russia  Yes  Yes  Yes  Medium  High  High  High  High  Medium  Low  Medium  Medium 
Scotland  Don't play Don't play  No  No interest  No interest  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  No interest 
San Marino  Yes  Yes  Yes  Low  Low  Medium  No interest  Low  Medium  Medium  Low  Low 
Serbia  No  No  Yes  Low  Low  Low  Low  Medium  Medium  Low  Low  Medium 
Spain  Yes  Yes  Yes  Medium  Medium  Low  Low   Medium  High  High  Low  Low 
Switzerland  Yes  Yes  Yes  Low  Low  High  Low  Medium  Medium  Low  Low  Low 
Slovakia  No  Yes  Yes  Low  Medium  Low  Low  High  High  Medium  Low  Medium 
Slovenia  No  No  No  Low  Low  Medium  Medium  High  Medium  Low  Medium  Medium 
Sweden  No  No  No  Medium  Low  No interest  Medium  Medium  Low  Low  Low  Low 
Turkey  Don't play Yes  Yes  Low  Medium  High  Low  High  High  Low  Medium  High 
Ukraine  No  Yes  Yes  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  Medium  High  Medium  Low  Medium 

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 108/110 Borut Kukovec


Wales  Don't play Don't play  Don't play No interest  No interest  No interest  No interest  No interest  No interest  No interest No interest  No interest 

MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 109/110 Borut Kukovec


MSA 2009 – AISTS - Personal Project Page 110/110 Borut Kukovec

Potrebbero piacerti anche