Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Module 2
Models of HRM
2.1 Defining Characteristics of HRM Models
2 Model Types
Matching - HARD - Prescriptive - Unitarist - Fombrun (1984)
Harvard - Soft - Analytical - Pluralist - Beer (1984)
1. Operational & implementation issue weighted
1. Strategic considerations
2. Prescriptive - tell mgrs "best way to do things"
2. Underlying structures and processes emphasis
3. Hard approach
3. Soft approach
4. Responsibility 4 line mgrs
4. Responsibility 4 line mgrs
5. Not far a departure from traditional PM practice
5. More departure from traditional PM practice
6. Unitarist approach-top mgmt sets strategy (only stakeholders)
6. Pluralist approach-many stakeholders
Unitarist Approach assumes only a small number of individuals or groups have a legitimate interest in the fate of the org.
Extreme Unitarist advocate only top mgmt responsible for devising strategy & its priority is to satisfy shareholders.
Pluralist Approach assumes a wide range of stakeholders who should account for the process of strategy formulation.
Political
Forces
Rewards
Cultural
Economic
Forces
Forces
Mission
&
Strategy
Org.
Structure
Selection
Performance
Appraisal
Development
Firm
Human Resource Cycle
HRM
Advantages
1. HR activities integrated in pursuit of business strategy.
2. Links HR strategy to business strategy
1
Debora Cooper
Process Stages
1. Mkt orientation determine optimal
competitive strategy.
2. Employee performance goals set
a. select new employees
b. appraise employees/performance goals
c. base rewards on performance goals
d. correct deficiencies
Disadvantages
1. account of employee needs
2. #of stakeholders
3. No trade unions or society
4. 1way relation = Business strategyHRM Strategy
Performance Requirements
(Employee Role Behavior)
creative behavior
Long focus
level operative interdependent behavior
HRM Strategy
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Boxall's Criticisms
No systematic research - only field studies
Unitarists assumptions "done to" not "with"
Strategy formulation not realistic as suggested
Validity assumptions misplaced since criticized
restrictive - ignores attitudes & behavior variables
2close fit of HR & Business strategiesinflexibility, inadaptability 2 change
Shareholders
Mgrs
Employee Groups
Government
Unions
Community
Situational Factors
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Business strategy
Workplace nature
Labor mkt
Laws
Social values
Reward system nature
Work system type
Employee decision influence
influence
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Conclusion
1. Business strategy role dominant
2. Analytical not prescriptive
3. Closely related to performance mgmt
4. pluralistic - many stakeholders
2
Debora Cooper
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Cost effectiveness
Performance req. met
commitment
Adapt 2 change easy
Adapt 2 opps & threats
Self motivated employee
Mutual commitment
" goals
" respect
" responsibility
satisfaction
well being
social benefit
HR Outcomes
Org Outcomes
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
High
Strategic information
Commitment
Flexibility, adaptability
Quality of workforce,
mgmt, product, job
performance, reputation,
customer, HR policies
influenced by
Low
1. Job performance
2. Problem solving
3. Change
4. Innovation
5. Cost effectiveness
1. Turnover
2. Absences
3. Grievances
Leadership/Culture/Strategy
2.3.3 The Pettigrew Approach (1990)-Hendry & Pettigrew were more interested in understanding of the
structures and processes that influence strategy making then in "armchair
exercise of matching strategy to HR process."
Outer Context
Socio-Ecnomic
Technical
Politcal -Legal
Competition
Inner Context
Culture
Structure
Politics/Leadership
Task-Technology
Business Outputs
Business Strategy
Content
Objectives
Product-Mkts
Strategy, Tactics
HRM Context
2way relationship
Role
Definition
Organization
HR Outputs
HRM Content
HR Flows
Work Systems
Reward Systems
Employee Relations
1.
2.
3.
4.
3
Debora Cooper
Boxall's Criticisms
1. realism of assumptions & practical application
2. Does commitmentperformance
3. commitment - how
4. Change culture - how
5. Common interests sustainable?
6. Principle/agent problem -conflict of interests
Political
Forces
Rewards
Cultural
Economic
Forces
Forces
Mission
&
Strategy
Org.
Structure
Selection
Performance
Appraisal
Development
Firm
Human Resource Cycle
HRM
Advantages
1. HR activities integrated in pursuit of business strategy
2. Links HR strategy to business strategy
Disadvantages
1. account of employee needs
2. #of stakeholders
3. No trade unions or society
4. 1way relation = Business strategyHRM Strategy
Boxall's Criticisms
1. No systematic research
2. Unitarists assumptions "done to" not "with"
3. Strategy formulation not realistic as suggested
4. Validity assumptions misplaced since criticized
5. restrictive - ignores attitudes & behavior variables
6. 2close fit of HR & Business strategiesinflexibility, inadaptability 2 change
4
Debora Cooper