Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
4, 2003
secretion of neurotransmitters, thus maintaining the normal functions of the human body and providing
comfort. However, there has been little research-based evidence to support the positive effects of
acupressure in the area of obstetric nursing. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of LI4
and BL67 acupressure on labor pain and uterine contractions during the first stage of labor. An
experimental study with a pretest and posttest control group design was utilized. A total of 127
parturient women were randomly assigned to three groups. Each group received only one of the
following treatments, LI4 and BL67 acupressure, light skin stroking, or no treatment/conversation
only. Data collected from the VAS and external fetal monitoring strips were used for analysis. Findings
indicated that there was a significant difference in decreased labor pain during the active phase of the
first stage of labor among the three groups. There was no significant difference in effectiveness of
uterine contractions during the first stage of labor among the three groups. Results of the study
confirmed the effect of LI4 and BL67 acupressure in lessening labor pain during the active phase of the
first stage of labor. There were no verified effects on uterine contractions.
Key Words: acupressure, labor pain, uterine contractions, meridian theory.
Introduction
Pain is a subjective and intricate experience resulting
from the interaction of the physiological and psychosocial
aspects of the body. Pain experienced during labor is unique
and highly individualized. Recent research on labor pain has
emphasized the importance of non-pharmacological paincoping strategies, but the effectiveness of these strategies
when used in labor has not been directly examined.
Acupressure, a noninvasive technique of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has been reported to be useful to both
induce labor and manage labor pain (Jimenez, 1995;
Stephens, 1997). Regrettably, a lack of controlled clinical trials to validate its effectiveness has limited its dispersion in
education and in practice. Therefore, the primary aim of this
study is to evaluate the effectiveness of acupressure on labor
pain and uterine contractions during the first stage of labor.
RN, EdD, Professor & President, National Taipei College of Nursing; *RN, MS, Head Nurse, National Taipei College of Nursing Hospital;
** RN, PhD, Associate Professor, Graduate Institute of Nurse-Midwifery, National Taipei College of Nursing; ***MD, MS, Deputy
President, National Taipei College of Nursing Hospital.
Received: March 4, 2003 Revised: August 14, 2003 Accepted: September 12, 2003
Address correspondence to: Su-Chen Kuo, No. 365, Ming-Te Rd., Peitou, Taipei 112, Taiwan, ROC.
Tel: 886(2)2822-7101 ext. 3262; Fax: 886(2)2826-3974; E-mail: suchen@mail1.ntcn.edu.tw
251
Methods
Design and Sampling
A pretest/posttest control group design was used to
minimize the effect of extraneous variables on the dependent variable of the study. Based on the experimental design
adopted, a two-step selection process was used to insure a
completely randomized sample and distribution using blind
drawings (Burns & Grove, 1999; Montgomery, 1976). The
first drawing determined the sequence of the three groups:
acupressure, effleurage and control group. The second
drawing determined the distribution of numbers between the
three groups using an arbitrary range of one to 150. Subjects
were assigned numbers based upon the admission sequence
of parturient women who met the criteria for selection. The
sampling criteria were: (1) an estimated gestational age of
the fetus between 37 and 42 weeks, (2) no high-risk pregnancy conditions, (3) mothers carrying one fetus, and (4)
able to interact verbally in Chinese. All parturient women
who received medications during labor such as induction
with oxytocin or an epidural block, or who had cesarean sections, were excluded from the study.
Instruments
252
Procedures
The study encompassed two phases, preparation and
execution.
The Preparation Phase
1. Five nurse-midwives participating in the study were thoroughly trained and educated in providing acupressure and
effleurage, and were trained in the data collection procedure.
2. In order to maintain the validity and reliability of acupressure performance, three steps were taken to assure
the validity and reliability of the acupressure treatment
(Betts, 2001; Chen, Lin, Wu, & Lin, 1999; Perinatal
Education Associates, 2001):
(1) An acupressure protocol was established based on a
relevant literature review and consultation with licensed traditional Chinese physicians who had graduated from medical
schools in Taiwan and had practiced acupuncture for more
than 15 years. The protocol contains a selection of the
acupoints, the manual techniques of acupressure and time
duration of intervention. Three acupoints, LI6, BL67, and
SP6 (Spleen 6) were originally chosen. SP6 was eliminated
after pilot testing due to a high rejection rate by subjects
because of the intolerable pain brought on by stimulation of
that acupoint (see Figure 2). Accurate location of the
accupoint was confirmed if the subjects felt soreness, numbness, heaviness, distention, and/or warmth. The time of inter-
253
4. Within one to two hours after delivery, with the permission of the subjects, one-on-one interviews were conducted to understand the subjects feelings and opinions
about the care received. An interview guide which was
reviewed by a panel of experts and pilot tested on three
postpartum clients was used. Open questions like Tell
me about your labor experience and Describe the care
you received were used to explore subjects feelings
about the care. With the permission of the subjects, a tape
recorder was used during interviews, and the recordings
were transcribed verbatim and then analyzed. The qualitative data collected was used to help clarify the results
revealed by analysis of the quantitative data.
5. The data were collected by the investigator and four
midwives from September 2000 to March 2001.
Table 1.
Procedure and Performance of Acupressure and Effleurage
Acupressure
Sites and duration
Left LI4
Right LI4
Right BL67
Left BL67
Manual techniques
254
5 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
Effleurage
Left upper-outer arm 10 minutes.
Right upper-outer arm 10 minutes.
Ethical Considerations
In order to minimize the Hawthorne and novelty
effect, two stages of consent for participation were
adopted. Consent to participate was obtained from subjects
upon admission and only by telling them that this was a
hospital study; no specific information was given. Assurances were provided that whether or not they decided to be
involved in the study, it would not make any difference to
their medical care and all information collected would be
treated confidentially and used only for the research. Candidates also had the right to withdraw at any time during
the study. During the initial consent stage, no subjects
declined. The second stage of consent was obtained after
the final interview when the purpose and the procedure of
the study were explained to the subjects. The subjects were
again asked for their consent to the use of their information
in the final data analysis. If the subjects declined to partici-
pate in the study at this point, the data collected from them
would be discarded. No participants declined. During the
study, a total of 23 subjects withdrew from the study either
to opt for cesarean sections or pain medications, seven subjects from the acupressure group and eight from each of the
other two groups.
Results
Characteristics of Subjects
There were a total of 127 subjects who both met the
sampling criteria and consented to participate in the
study. The attrition rate and reasons for attrition were
about the same across the three groups. The major reason
for attrition was the subjects deciding to receive pain
medication and/or labor induction. The demographic
characteristics of the subjects (as shown in Table 2) were
Table 2.
Comparison of Demographic Characteristics Among Three Groups (N = 127)
Variables
Acupressure Group
(n1 = 43)
Frequency
%
Effleurage Group
(n2 = 42)
Frequency
%
Control Group
(n3 = 42)
Frequency
%
c2
p value
Age
15 - 30
31 - 42
29
14
32.2
37.8
28
14
31.1
37.8
33
9
36.7
24.3
1.939
.379
Religion
Yes
None
33
10
44.0
19.2
19
23
25.3
44.2
23
19
30.7
36.5
9.201
.10
Education
Junior high or below
Senior high
College or above
9
19
15
32.1
27.9
48.4
11
23
8
39.3
33.8
25.8
8
26
8
28.6
38.2
25.8
4.708
.319
Occupation
Employed
Housewife
24
19
43.6
26.4
17
25
30.9
34.7
14
28
25.5
38.9
4.578
.101
11
26
6
20.8
40.6
60.0
21
18
3
39.6
28.1
30.0
21
20
1
39.6
31.3
10.0
9.123
.058
Dysmenorrhea
None
Yes
17
26
33.3
34.2
16
26
31.4
34.2
18
24
35.3
31.6
0.209
.901
30
13
34.9
31.7
29
13
33.7
31.7
27
15
31.4
36.6
0.343
.842
Note. % of married women was 41/43, 39/42, 39/42, almost identical for three groups. n1: number of subjects in the acupressure
group; n2: number of subjects in the effleurage group; n3: number of subjects in the control group. N = n1 + n2 + n3.
255
Table 3.
Comparison of Obstetric Characteristics Among Three Groups (N = 27)
Variables
Parity
Primiparous
Multiparous
Acupressure Group
(n1 = 43)
Frequency
%
Effleurage Group
(n2 = 42)
Frequency
%
Control Group
(n3 = 42)
Frequency
%
c2
p value
20
23
29.9
38.3
21
21
31.3
35.0
26
16
38.8
26.7
2.211
.331
9
4
34.6
33.7
12
30
46.2
29.7
5
37
19.2
36.6
3.591
.166
29
14
36.3
29.8
24
18
30.0
38.3
27
15
33.8
31.9
1.012
.603
35
8
34.0
33.3
34
8
33.0
33.3
34
8
33.0
33.3
0.004
.998
23
20
35.9
31.7
20
22
31.3
34.9
21
21
32.8
33.3
0.297
.862
15
9
19
38.5
23.7
38.0
11
16
15
28.2
42.1
30.0
13
13
16
33.3
34.2
32.0
0.682
.711
Gestational Weeks
37 - 40
41 - 42
Sex of Newborn
Male
Female
256
Table 4.
Comparison of Mean Scores of VAS Difference Among Three Groups
Acupressure Group
Phases of labor
Effleurage Group
Control Group
Frequency
SD
Frequency
SD
Frequency
SD
c2
p value
37
37
8a
-0.01
0.17
0.19
1.04
1.32
1.33
32
34
13
0.45
0.66
0.28
1.16
1.36
1.01
29
39
20
0.55
0.81
0.05
0.89
1.23
0.42
5.9554
6.3592
1.4680
.051
.041*
.480
Latent
Active
Transitional
Note. c2 of Kruskal-Wallis Test. aThe decreased number of subjects in the transitional group was due to some subjects (1) having
short transitional phases (less than one hour) and (2) not wanting to be assessed during this difficult period. *p < .05.
Other Findings
For a more in-depth analysis of the data, the duration
of the first stage of labor was examined for the three
groups. From Table 6, the results indicate that there was a
significant difference in the duration of the first stage of
labor among the three groups (F = 4.055, p = .019). Using
Table 5.
Comparison of the Mean of Montevideo Units Difference Among Three Groups
Acupressure Group
Phases of labor
Latent
Active
Transitional
Effleurage Group
Control Group
Frequency
SD
Frequency
SD
Frequency
SD
c2
p value
35
34
5
20.05
30.51
46.10
56.66
82.69
44.85
33
33
12
15.71
33.98
20.31
50.02
75.38
59.56
29
36
14
5.63
22.12
38.39
59.31
67.08
64.88
1.3594
0.8223
0.5550
.506
.662
.757
Frequency
43
SD
6.33 2.55
Effleurage Group
Frequency
42
SD
7.13 3.14
Control Group
Frequency
42
SD
Bonferroni
test
AEC
A < C**
Note. A: population mean of acupressure group; E: population mean of effleurage group; C: population mean of control group; AE:
accept Ho: A = E; EC: accept Ho: E = C; A < C: accept H1:A < C. *p < .05; **p < .01.
257
tracted their attention away from their labor pain. The psychological benefits of light stroking demonstrated by subjects did not seem to be reflected by the dependent variables of the study.
Discussion
The Effect of Acupressure on Labor Pain Relief
The findings of the study suggest that there was a significant difference in decreased labor pain among the
three groups in the active phase of the first stage of labor.
The acupressure group experienced the most labor pain
relief out of the three groups. Therefore, the results of the
study support the hypothesis that the acupressure group
experienced a greater decrease in labor pain than those in
the effleurage and control groups during the active phase
of the first stage of labor. Much of the empirical data indicated that acupressure of LI4 and BL67 provided pain
relief during labor (Beal, 1992; Betts, 1999; Brown,
Douglas, & Flood, 2001; Simkin, 1995), however, none of
the information specifies the particular time during the
labor process at which acupressure would be most beneficial. The results of the study fail to support the hypothesis
that the acupressure group experienced a greater decrease
in labor pain than those in the effleurage and control
groups during the latent and transitional phases of the first
stage of labor.
Since the p value for the difference in decreased
labor pain among the three groups in the latent phase is
.051, very close to 0.05, it is promising that with an
increased number of subjects, the acupressure group
would present some degree of effectiveness in labor pain
relief in the latent phase. This phenomenon is worth further investigation. As for the reason why there was no significant difference in labor pain relief among the three
groups in the transitional phase, it could be that the labor
pain was too intense to manage. When the pain was overwhelmingly strong, none of the measures seemed to make
much difference. The acupressure probably worked the
best in terms of pain relief when the pain was moderate (in
the active phase) or even when the pain was mild (in the
latent phase).
258
uterine contractions than those in the effleurage and control groups during the latent, active and transitional
phases of the first stage of labor. Information offered from
external fetal monitoring might not be as accurate as the
information obtained from internal fetal monitoring. The
record from external fetal monitoring may be influenced
by the position in which the woman in labor lies and by
her pushing. In order to fit this study to the reality of
actual practice of Taiwan, information was only collected
from external fetal monitoring. It is recommended that
similar studies should be replicated in the future, perhaps
in other countries, by using information from internal
fetal monitoring. In the literature it is speculated that the
effects of labor induction or augmentation by acupressure
was a result of increased secretion of oxytocin in the
body. Therefore, further investigations should be conducted to determine the relationship between acupressure
and oxytocin level.
Other Findings
The data suggest that the acupressure group had a
shorter duration of the first stage of labor than the control
group, even though the acupressure did not produce more
effective uterine contractions. Labor is a very complex process and is affected by many intertwined factors. Further
investigation regarding these phenomena is warranted.
The qualitative data collected from the study were
similar to the results found by Brown et al. (2001) and Wu
(2003). Positive feelings were usually aroused and voiced
by patients when nurses applied acupressure or effleurage
to alleviate labor pain. Clearly, this study has further corroborated the findings of previous empirical studies with
regard to the effectiveness and utility of such non-invasive
care.
Many acupoints are said to have benefits in labor
pain relief and labor induction (Betts, 1999; Perinatal
Education Associates, 2001). LI4 and BL67 are the
acupoint sets most frequently mentioned in the literature
by perinatal practitioners. Different sets or combinations
of acupoints should be experimented with in the future to
identify the most useful regimen for clients in labor. In
addition to the indicators employed in the study,
endorphine and oxytocin levels in serum should also be
used as objective indicators to further validate the results
of the study. Unfortunately, quantitative analysis was limited by a relatively small sample size because of the difficulties in collecting data during the transitional phase of
the first stage of labor. As a corrective, a much larger sample size should be utilized to test the null hypothesis during the related transitional period.
References
Beal, M. W. (1992). Acupuncture and related treatment
modalities: Applications to antepartal and intrapartal care
Part 2. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 37(4), 260-268.
Betts, D. (1999). Acupressure analgesia: Providing
pain relief during labor. Pacific Journal of Oriental Medicine, 13, 6-8.
Betts, D. (2001). Acupressure techniques for use during
labor. Available http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/ debra_betts/
Brown, S. T., Douglas C., & Flood, L. P. (2001).
Womens evaluation of intrapartum nonpharmacological
pain relief methods used during labor. Journal of Perinatal
Education, 10(3), 1-8.
Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (1999). Understanding
nursing research. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
Chang, H. J. (2002). Statistics (3rd ed.). Taipei: Watai
Publishing.
Chen, M. L., Lin, L. C., Wu, S. C., & Lin, J. G. (1999).
The effectiveness of acupressure in improving the quality
of sleep of institutionalized residents. Journal of Gerontology, 54A(8), M389-M394.
Clark, A. L., Affonso, D. D., & Harris, T. H. (1979).
Childbearing: A nursing perspective (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
Coggins, M., & Freels, D. L. (2000). Acupressure: An
alternative therapy in the childbearing cycle. Mother Baby
Journal, 5(3), 11-15.
Cook, A., & Wilcox, G. (1997). Pressuring pain:
Alternative therapies for labor pain management. AWHONN
Lifelines, 1(2), 36-41.
Harrison, A. (1991). Childbirth in Kuwait: The experiences of three groups of Arab mothers. Journal of Pain &
Symptom Management, 6(8), 466-475.
259
* **
***
127
VAS
* **
***
92 3 4
92 8 14 92 9 12
112 365
260